ماهنامه مثلث شماره 17
ماهنامه مثلث شماره 17
ماهنامه مثلث شماره 17
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﯾﺎزدﻫﻢ 26 /ﻣﻬﺮ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
¯¨:½ZÌZ
Á]|Ë´]Á½Z»ZÌW
ﻭ
ﺻﺎ ﺩﻕ
ﺍﺯﺷﮑ ﺴﺘﮕﯽﺁﺧ ﺮ ﯾﻦ ﻣﻴ ﺮﺍﺙ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﮔ ﺰ ﺍﺭﺷﯽ ﻭﺭ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ،ﻋﺒﺎﺱﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺭﺳﺎﯾﯽ
ﺗﻮﻣﺎ ﻥ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ 1000 /
ﻭﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ 5 /ﻣﻬﺮ 148 /1 388
ﺳﺎﻝﺍ /
ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ
/
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺗ
§¾Ì·Z
®§¾Ì·Z
»®
»
]¨|Á
{½ Z¼ ¸Ì§|¿Y
½ZËY´·ÂY ËY
»µ|f
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺯﯾﺒﺎ ﮐﻼﻡ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﯽ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ
:ʫe Z|̼u
»ºÌfÌ¿ ª§Y» {Y¿É|¼uY Z] ZÅÁ { Z
ﻭﯾﮋﻩﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﯾﻨﯽ
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺟﻌﻠﯽ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﭘﻨﺠﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪیﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ
ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺮﻧﺞﻫﺎی ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺗﯽ
{ :|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻭﯾﮋﻩ
ﺳﺎﻝﻭﯾﮋﻩ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
8ﺳﺎﻝ
+48
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻬﻢ 12 /ﻣﻬﺮ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ دﻫﻢ 19 /ﻣﻬﺮ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
¯| ] Á{ ʸ¯Âe Á ÀÅZ] ¶j» Ê¿Z
{ |¿ÂÊ» dÌuÔ
½ZËY´·ÂY ¹YÁ|Ì»Y
]|¿Á] ¥Z^Ì·Z« ¶j» É{§ d¼ Ä
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
½{Y{ ÉY m ÉYÃZq ½ZËY´·ÂY
]|ÀfY|¿ {Y¿É|¼uY Ä
]ʸ § ÉZÅÁ Y Ì£ ÊËZÅÁ Z
dY ½ZËY´·ÂY ½M Y Ã|ÀËM
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻭﯾﮋﻩﻧﺎﻣﻪ
8ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
:¹Ô¯ Z^Ë ©{Z
|Ê» Z¼ d]¿ {Á ZË Ë{ !Ê«e ÉZ«M
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ 5 /ﻣﻬﺮ 148 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
:ʬWZ§|Ì
|ÀfÅ ½Z^¸ sÔY
dY{dÁ{ʼZÅÉZ«M
{{ÂÉÁZ»Ê]Y
: |Ì¿YÂy
|Ì¿YÂy
»Ê
¼Ê»ÃZ
ÃZ¼¾ËY
¾ËY
{{
»ÄËZ
{½YY
{
Á
Äq
»Ê
¯Z¿.|ÀÀ
Äf¨³
ÊËZÅ
Y
ÄÀ˳
cYÁ
{ZY
¿Z
¯º
¸Ê
É{Z]M
Á
»½ZÌ]Yv
Ä^WZ
\¸¬e
{
cZ]Zzf¿Y
½Zf¿Z¤§Y
µZnÀm
]
[Zzf¿Y
ÉYÁ
½
Ê]Ó
½YËÁ
]ÉY
ÉY
Y{Z¼fY
{d·Á
»ÉÂÂ
Ze
{d·Á
É|¼uY
¿{Y
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
¸Ê
»ÊËYÌ
»¾v
Ê»ÔY
-
×Y|
¿ÉÌ
»Z|¼v
¾Ìu
{ɸÅ
-
¸Ê
^ºZ¬·YÂ]YÂbZ
Ê¿Z¼u
-
»É|Æ
½Á|˧©{Z
-|¿ÂÀu
Z|̼u
¯½ZËÂeZ
{Z¼|Ì
-ÊÀÌu
´É
»É{ÁÂ
©{Z
Z^Ë
¯¹Ô
-
^
Z
ÂËY{ÊËZm
«-É^À
Z|̼u
§LÔ³{ÓÂ
»|¼v»Ì
Ê«{Z
-
ÊÌvË
µM
©ZvY
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Y
Äf¨Å½Z»Âe
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
/¹ZÆq
8
ÂËÆ
/1388
/Äv¨100
Êf«Á½Z»Âe1000
Ä¿Z
ÉZÅ
{d·Á
]ÊËZ¼À³
»Ê
¯|ÀÀ
1
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
»-h¸j
{
ÃZe
Y
dÌ «YÁ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
¾Ìu
ÊfËY|Å
-
¸Ê
ÉZ¿Y
»¾v
¿½Z¼Ë
-
»Z|¼v
¿ZÆm
»É|Æ
ʼZÅ
É°e
-
¿}Â
¨Ê Ì
É{ZÅ
»¬|Ê
-
»|¼v
»-ÊÅÔ
wÅZ
üu¾Ì»Y
\Ì°
-
c
×Y
½Z̨ÂË
ºZ¯|Ì
Ê»¯Y
-
{YÂm
¾ËM
»¾v»À
¯¾°ÅÂ
-
Z»Ô£
»^ÊuZ
»¬|¹
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
¿½Z
{
¯ÄÀÌ]Z
-
ÌW
|Ë|m
Á
Ä]Y
½YËY
Á
Z°Ë»M
-
Z¼Ì
{
»½Z
Y
{d·Á
¯Z
Ze
{d·Á
®Ë-d»|y
¿Ä»Z
ÄÌZua
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
ʬÀ̸:|Ì¿YÂy
-ʻZy
°
½Z¼Ìa{Y¿^¯Y
§-Á
|̼m
ÉZ¿Y
^ʸ Z
-Ê·Y
§{Z
»ÊÀ»Â
¸ZÌ
»-[Ânv
¾Ìv»Ô£
×Y¿¹ZÆ·Y
Ê]Ye
-
Ä·Ó
ÉZzf§Y
¶ÌZ¼Y
Ê»Y³
»¬|¹
-
»|¼v
¿ÂaÌ
»Z|¼v
ÊËZ
-
ÃÅ
½ZÌÆ·Y
»Ê^fn
ɯZ
-
»Z|¼v
Z^y
»|¼v
ÉY|¼f Ë
-
¸ZÌ
»¿|É
]Z
ÉZf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Y
Äf¨Å½Z»Âe
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
¹Â
µÁY/
ÂËÆ
/1388
/Äv¨100
ÊÅZ´¿½Z»Âe1000
]Ä
¿|ʳ
»Ê¨»Ì
Ê·Z
¿\
|d·Y
Âm
44Äv¨{»Ìa
{
|Ä¿Zzf·Y
§¥Â¸Ì
¨½Z{Ây88Äv
»¹fv
dY
¿
º¿Zy
Ê^m
]ÉY
§Ä¼Z
Äf¨Å:·ÂmM
[Ây
]Z
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
»h¸j
MOSALAS.IR
ʸ ÀÌu
µÔmÉZËÆ
ÊÌvË
Ã{Y
-
¸Ê
·|Ì
¸Ê
Ê¿Z¼u
-
Z
Ê¿Y{Ë
|¼v»Ì»Ô
Ê«{Z
×Y|Y
´É{ÓÁY
]¾¼Æ
¯ÁZ
-
¾Ìu
¸Ê¼Ì
Z|̼u
Ê«e
-
»ºË
]ÉÁÆ
ÊÌ
¯Éf¿Ô
-
¶ÌZ¼Y
¯ÉiÂ
^
Z
¸Ê¼Ì
¿¼¾Ì
©ZvY
d¨³ÉÌ´¿ZÆm
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¿¼Ê
|¿ÁM
4
5ZË
¿¨
ÌaÉY
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{¹Á
/
25
»{/1388{Y
/Äv¨100
½Z»Z½Z»Âe1000
Ã|¿ÁaÁ
ÉY
]ÉY
¼¸{°
ÉZ«M
¿¼Ã
¸Ê
-É{Z]M
¨4Äv
½Z»Z
¿¹Z
»d¨³Ê|ÀÆ
Á
³
]Z
¾ËYºË|ÌW
]Z
»ª§Â
^
Z
:É|¿ÂyM
¨Äv
ʻ8
»ºÌ¿Z
»fÀ
Ã|ÀËM
»|¼v
Äf¨Å:ʼZÅ
[Ây
]Z
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
»h¸j
{Â]MOSALAS.IR
Á
¿^{Â
¿{Â
]Ê
µZË
ÉZÅ
Ê¿Zf]Ze
Ê]½ÂË˸e
¯Ä»Z¿Z
½Z»Z
»Ìv
¼ÅdË
-¾ÌeÂa
ÂeYaY
¹Â
½YËY
.
cZ]Zzf¿Y
¿¹Z
»ÉÁÌaÊ|ÀÆ
»½Y|¬fÀ
{d·Á
{]Ê
ZÁY
ÊfÌÀ»Y
©Y
^Å
½Z^·Z
Ã|¿Áa½Zf¯Za
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»±
Y
É|¼uY
¿{Y
Zf¿Y
ÉZÅ
dY
½ZËY³
ÊfÀ
Ã|¿Áa
¶»Z e
»¸n
]Z
{d·Á
¿ºÆ
Á
{ºÅ
»Ê
{|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
®Ë
]µ{ZÃZ´fY{Z
§{ÊÁ
ʨ»Âa
ʼZÅ
^Z
{ÁÓ
¿Ê¨n
,
¸Ê
»¶ÌZ¼YÉÆ
¯,ÉiÂ
»|¼v
Ê]¬ Ë
|̼u
¯,½ZËÂeZ
|Y
×Y
]½ZÌr»Y{Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]Z
¯ËÆ
¹ZÆ]Y
ÉZÅ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎدﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭم/
8
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮیﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮی
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿t¸Y|ÀfÌ
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
-
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
-
ﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﮐﺎﺭ
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺧﺪﻣﺖ-ﯾﮏ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽ-
ﺷﮑﻮﺭ
ﺍﮐﺒﺮﻧﮋﺍﺩﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﺵ-
ﺟﻤﺸﻴﺪ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻌﻠﯽ
ﺯﺍﻟﯽ-
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ-
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ
ﺗﺮﺍﺑﯽ
-
ﻻﻟﻪ
ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭی
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮﭘﻮﺭ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺭﺿﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﺯﻫﺮﻩ
ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮیﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺧﺒﺎﺯ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭیﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺮﻧﺪی
]Z
ÉZf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺳﻮم
/ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐ
|d·Y
Âm
{»Ìaﺻﻔﺤﻪﺻﻔﺤﻪ4444
{
|Ä¿Zzf·Y
§¥Â¸Ì
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ½Z{Ây88
»¹fv
dY
¿
º¿Zy
Ê^m
]ÉY
§Ä¼Z
:·ÂmMﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﯽ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﺎﺭیﺟﻼﻝ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﯽ
ﻋﻼﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩی
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
-
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﻴﺴﯽ
ﮐﻼﻧﺘﺮی
-
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮیﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¿¼Ê
|¿ÁM
4
5ZË
¿¨
ÌaÉY
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
Ìa
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
§Ã|À^Ë
{|¿{Y
Ã|Á
ÉZÅ
دﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
دﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎدﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎدﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{:|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽ،
ﻧﻴﺮﻩ
ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﻃﺎﻫﺮﺧﺎﻧﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺟﺎﺭﯾﺎﻧﯽﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ،
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ،
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻗﻮﺍﻣﯽ
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺷﺸﻢ/
22
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺭﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ
ﺁﺧﺮﯾﻦ
ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
¯Ä¿ZyZ
¾ËyMÊ]Ô¬¿Y
§º¸Ì
§{Â
¯ÓÂaZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»«Áfe
Ȧj
É|¼uY
¿{Y
¼¶
»Ê
¯ÉÆ»|À
ºÅ
ÌW
ÂƼm
dnu{Â
¹ÔÓY
:ʼÌÅY]Y
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎدﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭم/
8
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮیﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮی
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿t¸Y|ÀfÌ
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎدﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭم/
8
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮیﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮی
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿t¸Y|ÀfÌ
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
-
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
-
ﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﮐﺎﺭ
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺧﺪﻣﺖ-ﯾﮏ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽ-
ﺷﮑﻮﺭ
ﺍﮐﺒﺮﻧﮋﺍﺩﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﺵ-
ﺟﻤﺸﻴﺪ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻌﻠﯽ
ﺯﺍﻟﯽ-
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ-
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ
ﺗﺮﺍﺑﯽ
-
ﻻﻟﻪ
ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭی
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮﭘﻮﺭ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺭﺿﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﺯﻫﺮﻩ
ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮیﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺧﺒﺎﺯ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭیﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺮﻧﺪی
]Z
ÉZf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺳﻮم
/ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐ
|d·Y
Âm
{»Ìaﺻﻔﺤﻪﺻﻔﺤﻪ4444
{
|Ä¿Zzf·Y
§¥Â¸Ì
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ½Z{Ây88
»¹fv
dY
¿
º¿Zy
Ê^m
]ÉY
§Ä¼Z
:·ÂmMﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﯽ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﺎﺭیﺟﻼﻝ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﯽ
ﻋﻼﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩی
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
-
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﻴﺴﯽ
ﮐﻼﻧﺘﺮی
-
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮیﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¿¼Ê
|¿ÁM
4
5ZË
¿¨
ÌaÉY
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
Ìa
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
§Ã|À^Ë
{|¿{Y
Ã|Á
ÉZÅ
دﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
دﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎدﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎدﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{:|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽ،
ﻧﻴﺮﻩ
ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﻃﺎﻫﺮﺧﺎﻧﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺟﺎﺭﯾﺎﻧﯽﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ،
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ،
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻗﻮﺍﻣﯽ
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺷﺸﻢ/
22
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺭﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ
ﺁﺧﺮﯾﻦ
ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
¯Ä¿ZyZ
¾ËyMÊ]Ô¬¿Y
§º¸Ì
§{Â
¯ÓÂaZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»«Áfe
Ȧj
É|¼uY
¿{Y
¼¶
»Ê
¯ÉÆ»|À
ºÅ
ÌW
ÂƼm
dnu{Â
¹ÔÓY
:ʼÌÅY]Y
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎدﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭم/
8
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮیﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮی
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿t¸Y|ÀfÌ
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ{YÂË
]Ö
Õ{Z¼fY
»½ZÌ
{d·Á
Á
ÀÅ
Y
[Yy
¯YÂË{|ÌÀ
]Ö
Õ{Z¼fY
»½ZÌ
{d·Á
Á
ÀÅ
Y
[Yy
¯]]]]]]]]]:Âa´:Âa´|ÌÀﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﻴﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭیﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﻴﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎﮐﻼﻡ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩی
ﺷﻤﺴﻰ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩی
ﺷﻤﺴﻰ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﻃﺒﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﻃﺒﺎ،
ﻟﻄﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﻧﺪﻩ،
ﻟﻄﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﻧﺪﻩ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ
ﻓﺮﺍﺗﯽ،
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ
ﻓﺮﺍﺗﯽ،
ﺟﻌﻔﺮ
ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﯽﺟﻌﻔﺮ
ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﯽﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻣﺴﺠﺪﺟﺎﻣﻌﯽﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻣﺴﺠﺪﺟﺎﻣﻌﯽ،
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﯽ،
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﯽ
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ
ﻃﻼﯾﯽﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ
ﻃﻼﯾﯽ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪی،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪیd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
{ÊZ¼¸bË
YÁa
{ÊZ¼¸bË
YÁa
da
Ã{a
da
Ã{a
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﭘﺎﯾﻴﺰیﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﭘﺎﯾﻴﺰیﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﯽ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ
ﺿﺮﺭ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﯽ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ
ﺿﺮﺭ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻏﺮﺑﺰﺩﮔﯽ
ﻭ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻣﺎ
ﻭ
ﻏﺮﺏﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻏﺮﺑﺰﺩﮔﯽ
ﻭ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻣﺎ
ﻭ
ﻏﺮﺏﻫﻤﻪ
ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﻫﺎی
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﻫﺎی
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﺎﯾﺖ
ﻫﺎی
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﺎﯾﺖ
ﻫﺎی
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{:|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﯽ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﺎﺭی
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی،
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﮐﺮﯾﻤﯽ
ﻓﻴﺮﻭﺯ
ﺟﺎﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻃﺒﻴﺒﻴﺎﻥﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻃﺒﻴﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺧﻮﺵ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺧﻮﺵ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ،
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽ
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Yﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﻫﻔﺘﻢ/
29
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ½YËY
Y
¿Ã|Ë{Z
]´{Ì
½YËY
Y
¿Ã|Ë{Z
]´{Ì
ÉYy
:
Z°Ë»M
¿¼Ê
|¿YÂe
]ÕY|°¿Z
»Z
Y
]|¿Â»ZÌ
]:ÖÀ¼Æ
Ö̸´¿Y
ZÅ
»Ê
|ÀÅYÂy
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|À^˧MOSALAS.IRISSN:
{|¿{Y
Ã|Á
ÉZÅ
دﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
دﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎدﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎدﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{:|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽ،
ﻧﻴﺮﻩ
ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﻃﺎﻫﺮﺧﺎﻧﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺟﺎﺭﯾﺎﻧﯽﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ،
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ،
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻗﻮﺍﻣﯽ
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺷﺸﻢ/
22
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺭﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ
ﺁﺧﺮﯾﻦ
ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
¯Ä¿ZyZ
¾ËyMÊ]Ô¬¿Y
§º¸Ì
§{Â
¯ÓÂaZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»«Áfe
Ȧj
É|¼uY
¿{Y
¼¶
»Ê
¯ÉÆ»|À
ºÅ
ÌW
ÂƼm
dnu{Â
¹ÔÓY
:ʼÌÅY]Y
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎدﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
§Ã|À^Ë
{|¿{Y
Ã|Á
ÉZÅ
دﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
دﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎدﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎدﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{:|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽ،
ﻧﻴﺮﻩ
ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﻃﺎﻫﺮﺧﺎﻧﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺟﺎﺭﯾﺎﻧﯽﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ،
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ،
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻗﻮﺍﻣﯽ
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺷﺸﻢ/
22
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺭﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ
ﺁﺧﺮﯾﻦ
ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
¯Ä¿ZyZ
¾ËyMÊ]Ô¬¿Y
§º¸Ì
§{Â
¯ÓÂaZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»«Áfe
Ȧj
É|¼uY
¿{Y
¼¶
»Ê
¯ÉÆ»|À
ºÅ
ÌW
ÂƼm
dnu{Â
¹ÔÓY
:ʼÌÅY]Y
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎدﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭم/
8
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮیﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮی
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿t¸Y|ÀfÌ
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ{YÂË
]Ö
Õ{Z¼fY
»½ZÌ
{d·Á
Á
ÀÅ
Y
[Yy
¯YÂË{|ÌÀ
]Ö
Õ{Z¼fY
»½ZÌ
{d·Á
Á
ÀÅ
Y
[Yy
¯]]]]]]]]]:Âa´:Âa´|ÌÀﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﻴﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭیﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﻴﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎﮐﻼﻡ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩی
ﺷﻤﺴﻰ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩی
ﺷﻤﺴﻰ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﻃﺒﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﻃﺒﺎ،
ﻟﻄﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﻧﺪﻩ،
ﻟﻄﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﻧﺪﻩ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ
ﻓﺮﺍﺗﯽ،
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ
ﻓﺮﺍﺗﯽ،
ﺟﻌﻔﺮ
ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﯽﺟﻌﻔﺮ
ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﯽﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻣﺴﺠﺪﺟﺎﻣﻌﯽﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻣﺴﺠﺪﺟﺎﻣﻌﯽ،
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﯽ،
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﯽ
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ
ﻃﻼﯾﯽﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ
ﻃﻼﯾﯽ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪی،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪیd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
{ÊZ¼¸bË
YÁa
{ÊZ¼¸bË
YÁa
da
Ã{a
da
Ã{a
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﭘﺎﯾﻴﺰیﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﭘﺎﯾﻴﺰیﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﯽ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ
ﺿﺮﺭ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﯽ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ
ﺿﺮﺭ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻏﺮﺑﺰﺩﮔﯽ
ﻭ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻣﺎ
ﻭ
ﻏﺮﺏﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻏﺮﺑﺰﺩﮔﯽ
ﻭ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻣﺎ
ﻭ
ﻏﺮﺏﻫﻤﻪ
ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﻫﺎی
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﻫﺎی
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﺎﯾﺖ
ﻫﺎی
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﺎﯾﺖ
ﻫﺎی
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{:|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﯽ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﺎﺭی
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی،
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﮐﺮﯾﻤﯽ
ﻓﻴﺮﻭﺯ
ﺟﺎﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻃﺒﻴﺒﻴﺎﻥﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻃﺒﻴﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺧﻮﺵ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺧﻮﺵ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ،
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽ
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Yﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﻫﻔﺘﻢ/
29
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ½YËY
Y
¿Ã|Ë{Z
]´{Ì
½YËY
Y
¿Ã|Ë{Z
]´{Ì
ÉYy
:
Z°Ë»M
¿¼Ê
|¿YÂe
]ÕY|°¿Z
»Z
Y
]|¿Â»ZÌ
]:ÖÀ¼Æ
Ö̸´¿Y
ZÅ
»Ê
|ÀÅYÂy
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|À^˧MOSALAS.IRISSN:
{|¿{Y
Ã|Á
ÉZÅ
دﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
دﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎدﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎدﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{:|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽ،
ﻧﻴﺮﻩ
ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﻃﺎﻫﺮﺧﺎﻧﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺟﺎﺭﯾﺎﻧﯽﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ،
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ،
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻗﻮﺍﻣﯽ
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺷﺸﻢ/
22
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺭﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ
ﺁﺧﺮﯾﻦ
ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
¯Ä¿ZyZ
¾ËyMÊ]Ô¬¿Y
§º¸Ì
§{Â
¯ÓÂaZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»«Áfe
Ȧj
É|¼uY
¿{Y
¼¶
»Ê
¯ÉÆ»|À
ºÅ
ÌW
ÂƼm
dnu{Â
¹ÔÓY
:ʼÌÅY]Y
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎدﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
ISSN: 2008-5281
:Ê» ¾Ìu
§ÉÁÌa É Ä] Y
Y e¹Â¸» ½ZËY´·ÂY
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍیﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﺮﯾﺎﻝ »ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ«
ﺪﯾﺸﻪ
ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﺸﻪ
ﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﺮﺳﻴﺪ
ﺍﻧﺪﯾ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩﺍﻧ
ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﺗﺎ ﻭﻧﻭﺁ
ﺍﻥ
ﺠﺎﻡ
ﺗﺎ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺍﯾﺮ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭی
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﯾﻤﻦﺮﺍﻧ
ﺑﻪﺳ
ﺍﯾﯽ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﻮﺍﯾﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺎﺣﺖ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺳﺎﺣﺖ
ﺩﺭ
ﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥﻘﻮ
ﻴﺎﻥ«ﺗﻘ
ﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﺗﻠﺦﺍﺯ«ﺗ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﺯﻌ
ﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺗﻠﺦ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﻴ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﭼﺎی
ﮐﺸﯽ
ﺍﺳﺖﺷ
ﮐﺸﯽ
ﭼﺎی
ﭼﻴﺰﺩﺭﻟﻮ
ﺍﺻ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﭼﻴﺰ
ﭼﭗﻭ
ﻞﻪ
ﭼﺮﺍ»
ﭼﭗﻭﺭ
ﻧﺴﻞ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺮﺍ»
ﭘﭼﻧﺴﻫﻤ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻤﺎﻋﯽIS SN: 20 08-528
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ
ﻣﺸﺎﯾﯽ 1
ﺍﺟﺘ MO
ﻣﺸﺎﯾﯽ
SALAS.IR
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺭﺣﻴﻢ
ﺑﺎﺭﻩﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺭﺣﻴﻢ
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻭ
ﺖﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺩ
ﺳﺎﺯی
ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯی
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﭘ ﺧﺒﺮ
ȃYmZ
ÉYm
{§Z»YY Z
{{Ì´]]Ã|Ë
´{Ì
¿Ã|Ë{Z¿Z
Y
Y½YËY
½YËY
¯|ÌÀ
[Yy
[Y yYYÀÅ
ÀÅ
{Ád·Á
»Ád·Á{½ZÌ
½ZÌ»Õ{Z¼fY
Õ{Z¼fY
]Ö]Ö
{YÂË
{YÂË
]:Z
:Z] ÊË
ÊËZųÁ
ZųÁd¨³
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ|:
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
Ì¿YÂy
Ì¿YÂy
ﺩﺭ
ﻴﺎﺳﯽ ﺩﺭ
»Ê
ﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ
»Ê
¼ÃZ
¼ÃZ
ﻫﺎیﺳﺳﻭ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻫﺎی
ﻫﺎی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺳﺎﯾﺖ
ﺳﺎﯾﺖ
ﺑﻄﻪ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
¾ËY
ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺭﺍ
ﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
¾ËY
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
{
{ ﭘﭘﺮ
{|Á ¨ ] ½ Z ¼ ¸Ì§|¿Y{Y
{Y
{
]]|¿Â »ZYÌ]Z» ÕY| °¿Z
´: Âa
´Âa
¿¼Á MZÅ°¨ ÀÁÊ°
{: Ã
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴ ﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ؛
]:Y ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
]½ÂÌZÌÄ
¿^Ä]|ËZ
¿^|ËZ
ﻃﺒﻴﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻴﺒ ﻴ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﯾﻴﺰی ﻃﺒ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻏﺮﺏ
ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺎﯾﻴﺰی
ﻼﻣﯽ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﻫﻤﻪﻪ
ﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥﻤ
ﻣﺎﻭ
ﺿﺮﺭﭘﺎﻫﻭ
ﻣﺎ
ﺟﺎﯾﯽ،
ﺿﺮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻄﻪﺳ ﭘ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺎﺷ ﺍ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ
ﻓﻴﺮﻭﺯﺍ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ
ﻏﺮﺑﺰﺩﮔﯽﻭﻤﺭﺍﺭ
ﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺮﺑﺰﺩﮔﯽﻭﺗ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺮﯾﻤﯽ
ﺧﻮﺵ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺧﻮﺵ
ﺩﺍﻧ
ﺩﺭﺩﺍﻧﺍ
ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻠﯽ
ﻤﺪﮐﻏ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﯽ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻄﻴ
ﻤﻪﺤ
ﻫﺗﻌﻣﭘ
|¿YÂe ʼ¿ Z° Ë » M: ÉYy
]|ÀÅY yÊ»ZÅ Ö̸ ´¿YÖÀ¼Æ
:
]
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴ ﺖ
ﻭﺍﻗ ﻌﻴ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯﺍﺯ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠ؛ﺚ؛
ﻣﺜﻠ ﺚ
ﺮﺿﺎ Sﺳ
ﺼﻴﺮی،ﻋ. IRﻠﻴ
ﺳﻌﺪﻧﺍﷲ
ISSN : 200-528
ﻤﯽ 8
MOﻠﻴ 1
ALAS
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﺎﺭی
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﯽ
ﺷﻴﺪی
ﺪی
ﺤﺎﻧﯽ
ﻧﯽ
ﻮﻓﻴﻘﯽ
ﻓﻴﻘﯽ
ﺮﻭﺯﻧﺪﻩ
ﺪﻩ
ﺷﻤﺴﻰ
ﻤﺴﻰﻡ
ﺎﮐﻼﻡ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭی
ﺩﺭی
ﻭﺯﻧﺎﻼ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎﮐ
ﺤ
ﺳﺒﺎﻴ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺪ
ﺯﯾﺒ
ﺳﺒ
ﻮﺭﻮﺮﻗ
ﺷﺗ
ﺎﺩﻕﻓﺗﻤﻓ
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﺟﻌﻔﺮ
ﺟﻌﻔﺮ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩی
ﺩی
ﺩﻕ
ﻒﻣﺤﺧ
ﻟﻄﻒﺪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎ
ﻭﻭ
ﺻ
ﮕﯽ،ﻤ
ﺍﺗﯽ،ﻄ
ﻓﺮﺍﺗﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﻴﮕﯽ،
ﻞﺩﻟ ﺍﺣ
ﻃﺒﺎﺍ،
ﻣﻌﯽ،
ﻃﺒﺎ،
ﺎﻣﻌﯽ
ﺑﻴ ،
ﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﺎﻋﻴ
ﻼﯾﯽﺮ
ﻃﻼﯾﯽ
ﻤﺪﻓ
ﺴﺠﺪﺟﺎ
ﯽﺟﻤ
ﺏ
ﺎﺏ
ﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺍﺳ
ﺤ
ﻫﺎﻃﺪﺳ
ﺮﺗﻀﯽﻤ
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻮﻫﺍﻣ
ﻣﺴﺠ
ﺪﺭﺿﻮﺎﺷ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻫﺎﻫ
ﺤﻤﺪﺪﺍ ﻟﻣ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻋﺒﻣ
ﺤﻤﻤ
ﻣ ﻣﺍﺤﺣ
ﺻﻔ ﺤﻪ 1000 /ﺗ ﻮﻣﺎ ﻥ
ﺷ ﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺸﺘ ﻢ 5/ﻣ ﻬ ﺮ 148 / 1388
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺗ ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /
ﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩ
ﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩ
ﻘﻴﻤﯽ
ﻴﻤﯽ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽ
ﻼﻣﺘﯽ
ﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﻻﺳﻼﻡﻘﺮ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻗﺮﻣ
ﺳ
ﺧﺴﻣﻏ
ﺴﻴﻦ
ﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺍﯾﯽ،
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤ ﺍ
ﺣﺠﺖﺤ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺖ
ﺣﺠ ﺯ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﻟﮏ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻟﮏ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﯽ،
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﻒ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﮐﺮﻣ
ﻧﺠ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮ ﺭ،
ﺳﭙﻮﺭ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻴﻦ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻋﺒﺎ ﺍ
ﯽﺣﺴ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﻠ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣ ﺤﻤﺪ
¼Ê¿Zz
Ê
½Z
½Z¬Å
¼¿Zz
¯¬Å{{ʼË
¾Ìu
¸Ê
ʸ, É|Æ
¾Ìu
¥Z^Ì·Z
»É|Æ
«, ¥Z^Ì·Z
,ʸÌ
,ʸÌZ¼Y
,»Z¼Y
»,Z¼
»« «Z¼
Z]|¼v
¾v
]«Z
»Ê^m|¼v
Ê^m
»¾v
»»|Ì
»f¯{n
»|Ìn
{¯f
»:|Ì¿YÂyÊ
¼Ê»ÃZ
¼ÃZ
¾ËY¾ËY
{ {
ﻮﻻﺕ
ﻻﺕ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﮑﺎ
ﺁﻣﺗﺤﺮﻮ ﯾ
ﺍﻥﻥﻭ ﺗﺤ
ﻮﻥ
ﺍﯾﺮ ﺍﻮ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﯾﺍﻣﻣﺮ
ﺑﻄﻪﭘﻴﻪ ﺍﺮ
ﮔﻮﺑﻮﻄ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﺖﻭ ﺭﮔﺍﺭﺍ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻞﻭ ﻭ ﮔ ﻔ
ﻥ
1000ﻣﺎﻠ ﻴ
116 /13 88ﺻﻔﺤﻪ /ﺗﺗﺤﻮ
ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺳﺎ ﻝ ﺍ ﻭ/ﻝ ﺷ ﻤﺎﺭﻩﻫﻔﺘﻢ 29 /ﺷ ﻬ ﺮ ﯾ ﻮﺭ
/
ﺧﺒ ﺮﻱ ،ﺗ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ
§¾Ì·Z
¾
»® §Ì·Z
»®
]:YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
Ã{a da
Ã{a
YÁa
{ÊZ¼¸bË
»:|Ì¿YÂyÊ
¼Ê»ÃZ
¼ÃZ
¾ËY¾ËY
{ {
MOSALAS.IR
¹
¯{¹
¯{{
¯{
»¯ ¹Z
¹Z
¹
¹Z»Y
Z» [Zf¯ {YÁ ¾» Y
ÉY] É{ZËÉZÅÌq
ÅÌq
Å
ÅÌq
Ìq
{Y{{ÁkÁ½{Âycu
c
u
ÖÌ
ÖÌW
ﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﺤﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﻠﮑﻮﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﻮﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﻓﻴﺎﻥ
ﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ
W
Z
Z
ﻣﺤ
ﺭﺋﻮ
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﮑ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺼﻄﻔﯽﻣﻠÁﻣ
{É
ﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻧﯽÁ
ﺪﺩی،
ﺑﻮﺍﻟﺎ
ﻣﺪﺩی،
{É{°Å
ﺳﺒﺤ
{°Å
ﺧﻮﺷﺨﻮ،
ﺷﺨﻮ،
¸Êﻣﻣ ﺍ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻣ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮﺣﺴﻦ
ﻦ
ﺍﻭﻭﺩ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮﺣﺴ
¸Ê
ﺧﻮ
,ÊËÔ
ﻻﺩی،ﺩ
ﺯﯾﺎﻥ،
ﯾﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺯﯾﺎﻥ،
ﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩی،
ﺍﯾﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺷﺎﻟﻮﯾﯽ،
,ÊËÔ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮ
ﻦﺍﻭ
¾Ì
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﺭﺿﺎ
u
ﻋﺴ
ﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ
¾Ìu
ﺤﻤﻮﺩ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺪ
ﺣﻤﻴ
ﺍﻣﺍﺳﺪ
:Z] ÊËZųÁ
ÊËZųÁ d¨³
d¨³
¿¼Á MZÅ° ¨ ÀÁ Ê°
{: Ã
{Ã{Ã
{
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
Ì¿YÂy
»Êﺭ
»Êﺩﺩﺭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽﺎ
ﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﻣﺮﯾ ﮑ
¼ÃZ
¼ÃZ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥﻭﺁ
یﺳ
ﺖﻫﻪﺎی
ﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﺍﺑﻄﺖ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺳﺎﯾ
ﺳﺎﯾ
¾ËY
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺭﭼ
ﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
{
¾ËY
{
ﭘ
:Z]ÊËZųÁ
ÊËZųÁ d¨³
d¨³
ISSN: 2008-5281
:ÊZ§ ¾Ë|·YµÔm
cY]Zz» ¶¯Ë|» Z] ³ Á d¨³
{««Y´f»|y» d·Á
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭی ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﺷﺮﮐﺖ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
IS SN : 2008
ﻤﺎﻋﯽ - 52 8 1
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ
MOS
ﻣﺸﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﺸﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺟﺘ
ALAS
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺭﺣﻴﻢ
ﺭﺣﻴﻢ
ﺖﻭﻩﺗﺎ. IRﻣﻴﻦ
ﻴﺎﺳﺖﻭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭ
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳ
ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯی
ﺳﺎﺯی
ﻧﺪﻩ ﺳ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺧﺒﺮ
ﭘﺮﻭ
§ZË©Y
]©Y§ Z
»Ä¿Z
Ä¿Z»º£º£
]Z
ȃYmZ
ÉY
mZ»Y
{§Z
{ §Z
]|¿Â »Z Ì]Y Z » ÕY| °¿Z
]
ﻣﺸﮑﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺸ ﮑ ﺎﺗ
ﭘﺮﻭﯾﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﯾﺰ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﺯﻭﺍﺯ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠ ﺚ؛
ﻣﺜﻠ ﺚ ؛
: YÊËZÅZf¨³
]ÊËZÅZ f¨ ³Z
]Z
ﺍﻧﺪﯾﺸﻪ
ﺪﯾﺸﻪ
ﮑﺎ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪ
ﺮﺳﻴﺪ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾ ﺍﻧ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥﻭ
ﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﻧ
ﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺖ
ﺗﺎ
ﺳﺮﺍ
ﺳﺮ
ﺠﺎﺭی
ﺩﻭﻟ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭی
ﺳ
ﻦ
ﯾﻤﻦ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺑﻪﻪ
ﺘﻘﺪ
ﯾﻤﺑ
ﺍﺑﻂ
ﺳﺎﺣﺖ
ﻭﺍﺑﻂﺗ
ﺗﻘﻮﺍﯾﯽﺭ
ﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥﻣﻨﺩﺩﺭ
ﻘﻮﺍﯾﯽ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﺭﻭ
ﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺭﻩ ﺭ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﺗ«ﻩ
ﻣﻬﺮ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎ
ﺷﺎﯾﺎﻥﺯ
ﺖ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﺯ
ﺦ
ﺷﺎﯾﺎﻥ
ﺦ
ﺗﻠ ﺍﺷ
ﺍﺻﻮ
ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺗﻠ
ﺭﺍﺳ
ﮐﺸﯽ
ﭼﻴﺰ
ﭼﺎی
ﭼﺎی
ﻧﺪﻩﻭ
ﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﭼﭗﻪ
ﭗ
ﻧﺴﻞ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﭼﺮﺍ»
ﭘﺮﻭﻞﺍ
ﭼﺮ
ﻫﻤ
ﻧﺴ
ﻋﻠ
ﭼ
ﻋﻠ
»ºË{¯Ö
Ö»{Z¼fY
{Z¼fY
ﻃﺒﻴﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﻴﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﯾﻴﺰیﺒ
ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﭘﺎﯾﻴﺰی
ﻫﻤﻪﻃ
ﺤﻤﺪ
ﺍﺳ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﻼﻣﯽ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﭘﺎﻭ
ﺍﺳﻣ ﻭ
ﺍﺑﻄﻪﻣﺎ
ﺿﺮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﯽ،
ﮔﺮﺍﻥﺎ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺟﺎﯾ ﻣ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﺭ
ﻫﺎﻭ
ﺮﻩ
ﻬﺮﻩ
ﻓﻴﺮﻭﺯ
ﭼﻬ
ﯽﻩ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﺭ
ﺸﮕﺎﺍﺭﻩ
ﻧﺘﻈﺎ
ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎ
ﺰﺩﮔﭼ
ﺧﻮﺵﮔ
ﮐﺮﯾﻤﯽ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎ
ﺑﺰﺩ
ﺧﻮﺵ
ﺩﺭﺍﺩ ﺭ
ﭼﻴﺰ
ﭼﻴﺰﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧ
ﻏﺮ
ﻋﻠﯽﺩ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻠﯽ
ﻧﺪﻩ
ﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﻏ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﯽ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻫﻤﻪﻭ
ﻌﻄﻴ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﭘﺮ
ﺗﺳ
ﺪﯽﻩ
ﻰ
ﺒﺎﮐﻼﻡﻡ
ی
ﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭﻼ
ﺪ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪ
ﺒﺤﺎﻧ
ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘ
ﺷﻤﺴ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭ
ﺯﻧﺎ ﻧﻘ
ﺴ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯ
ﺤﻴﮐ
ﺷﻴ
ﺒﺎﻤ
ﺮﻭ
ﻗﺎ
ﻮﻓ
ﺯﯾ
ﺯﯾﺷﺒﺳ
ﺳ
ﻮﺭ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻓﺗ
ی
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩ ﺪ
ﻭﻭﺩﺧ
ﻕﻤ
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﺴﻦ
ﻔﺮﺮ
ﺍﷲ
ﷲ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﻌﻔﺤ
ﺟﻌﺍﺩ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻟﻄﻒ
ﯽ،
ﻤﺪ
ﻄﻒ
ﮕﯽ،
ﺻﺎﻣ
ﺣﺍ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞﮕﺩﺟ
ﻃﺒﺎ،ﻴﻟﺣﺑﻴﻞ،
ﻓﺮﺍﺗﯽ،
ﯽ،
ﯽ
ﻣﻌﯽ
ﻌﯽﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻃﺒﻋﺍﺗﺍ
ﻃﻼﯾﺪﺑ
ﻼﯾﺮﺎ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺷﻤﯽ
ﺟﺎﻣ
ﻣﺴﺠﺪﺟﺎﻤﻤ
ﻣﺤﻓ
ﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ
ﺍﺳﻃ
ﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎﺪﺎﺏ
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ
ﺮﺗﻀﯽ
ﻮﻫﺎ
ﺿﺠ
ﻣﺴ ﻫ
ﻋﺒﺪ
ﺪﺭ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺪﺍ ﻟ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻣﺤﺪ
ﺤﻤﻣ
ﺤﻤﻋﺒ
ﺍﻣ ﻣﺣﻤ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺱ
ﺿﺎﯾﯽ
ﯽ
ﻣﻘﺭﺿﺪﺎﯾ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﺤﺩ ﻓﺴﺎ ﻉ
ﻦ
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺳﺎﺑﺎﺎﻣﻝ
ﮔﻮ ﺑ
ﺖﻭیﻭ 8ﮔ ﻮ
ﻫﺎی
ﮔﻔﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻔ ﮔﺘ ﻔﻫ
ﻧﻧﺎﺎﺩﺭﮔ
| ÀÅYÂ y Ê» ZÅ
]Ö Ì¸ ´¿ Y : ÖÀ¼Æ
]
´: Âa
´ Âa
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﻠﻴﻤﯽISS N : 200 8 -528
1 MOS
ﺮﯾﺎﺭی
ﻌﻠﯽ
ﺣﺴ ﻴﻨ
ALASﺿﺎ ﺳ
ﻴﺮ
ﻴﺮی.،ﻠ
ﺷﻬ IRﻋ
ﻌﺪﺍﷲﻧﺼ
ﺳ
]´{Ì
|{ Ì´ Ã
]Ã|Ë{Z
Ë{Z¿Y Y¿½YËY
½ Y Ë Y |ÌÀ¯ [Y
[Y y
yYYÀÅ
ÀÅ
{Ád·Á
»Ád·Á{½ZÌ
½ZÌ»Õ{Z¼fY
¼Õ{Z
Ö]fY
]Ö
{YÂË
{YÂË
: ʼÌÅ Y]Y¹ÔÓ dnu
Y
ÉZÅÃ|Á
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺳﻼﻣﯽﻩ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟
ﮐﺮﺩ؟
ﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻮﺭﻫﺎی ﺍ
ﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥﺳ
ﺸ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻫﺎیﮐﺩﻧﺪ
ﺧﺎﻭﮐ
ﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﻫﺎی
ﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺑﺎﺯیﺧﻮﺭ
ﮔﺸﺖ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺮﮔﺸﺖﺭ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﭼﻪﺪﺍﻈﺎﺑﻪﻣ
ﭼﻪ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖﺍﻧ ﻧﺘ
ﺑﺮ
ﭘﻴ
ﮕﺮ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺸﻢ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺯﻧﯽ ﺑ
ﮐﻪ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷ
ﺩﺷﻪ
ﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞﮐﭼ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﺭ،
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺍﯾﯽ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،ﻧﺎ
ﺗﺠﺎ
ﻻ
ﺳﻮﮔﺮ
ﺳﻮ
ﻭﺯﺭ
ﻭ
:Z] ÊËZųÁ
ÊËZ ųÁd¨³
d¨ ³
{|¿{Y
§Ã|À^Ë
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺣ ﺴﻴﻨﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﯽ
ﺭﯾﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﻴﺪ
ﻃﺎﻫﺮ
ﺟﺎﺍﻥ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ،
ﺧﻮ
ﺎﺷﻤﯽﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﻬﺪی
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ،ﺍ
ﻴﻦﻣ ﻧﻴﺮﻩ
ﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،
ﻴﻌﯽ،
ﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﻌﻠﻢ
ﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌ ﻫ
ﺴ
ﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺭﻓﻣ
ﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﮐﻴﺩﮐ
ﻋ
« Áf»e à Z] { ÉY Ã| ¿Á a
¿¼| ¿YÂe Ê
Z° Ë »M ÉYy
:
MOSA LAS. IR
ISSN: 2 008
-528 1
Ó Âa Z {¯  §º ¸Ì§ ¾ Ë y M
{ ÂÀ¯ Ê
|
¼¶» Â
Ƽ m
{YÌW
|¿ É
ºÅ É
¼ uY
»Æ ¶j
»
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯﺍﺯﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺚ؛ ﺚ؛ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠ ﻣﺜﻠ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷﺎﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎی ﺩﺭﺱ ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩ ﻣﺪﺩی ،ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻣﺤﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﺁﯾﺖﺍﷲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻠﯽ
ﮐﻼﻡ ،ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺯﯾﺒﺎﮐﻼﻡ،
ﻧﺒﻮی ،ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻣﻠﮑﯽ ،ﻋﻠﯽ ﻣﻄﻬﺮی
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ ﻧﺒﻮی،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ ،ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ،ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﯽ
ﮐﻔﺎﺷﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻧﺠﻔﻘﻠﯽ ﺣﺒﻴﺒﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺧﺴﺮﻭیﻭﻓﺎ ،ﻋﻠﯽ ﮐﻔﺎﺷﻴﺎﻥ،
{¯Ê¿Zz¼ ʸ , ¥Z^Ì·Z« «Z] |¼v» f
{¯½Z¬Å{ ¾Ìu ,ʸÌZ¼Y ¾v» f
»Ê¼Ë¯É|Æ» , Z¼ »Ê^m |Ìn
ÖÌW Z Á É{°Å{ ʸ ,ÊËÔ ¾Ìu
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
+48
ZÅÊ]Ô¬¿Y
|¿|¿Z» ZÆÀe
¿{Ì´]]ÃÃ|Ë{Z
´{Ì
|Ë{Z ¿ Y
½Y
½YËY
YËY
MOSALAS.IR
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺍ ﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﻭﺭﺷﮑ ﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﺁﺧ ﺮﯾﻦ ﻣﻴ ﺮﺍﺙ ﺷ ﻬﻴﺪ
ﮔ ﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﯽ ﺍﺯ
ﺍ ﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﯾﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣ ﺮﯾ ﮑﺎ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄ ﺍﻪ ﻭ
ﻭ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
|¿YÂeʼ¿ Z°Ë»M: ÉYy
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩ
ﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﻼﻣﺘﯽ
ﻼﻣﺘﯽ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﺎﻥ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﺮﻭ ﯾ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻡ
ﺳ
ﻗﺮ
ﺧﺴ
ﺭﺿﺎ ﻏ
ﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،ﺍﻻ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺤﻤﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟ
ﻟﮏﻣ
ﮕﯽ،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﻟﮏ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﯽ،ﻋ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨ
ﻧﺠﻒﺮﻣ
ﮐﺮ،
ﺪﺭﺿﺎﺍ ﮐﻒ
ﺴﻴﻦ
ﻧﺠ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ
ﺳﭙﻮﺭ
ﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺳﻴ
ﺣ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺳ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
à Z^ » µZ
|
ISSN: 2008-5281
{ :|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
:
¯ Ê ]Ô ¬ ¿YÄ ¿Z y Z
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎدﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
دﮐﺘﺮ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ
ﺭﺍﻱﻭﺭﺍﻱ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪﺑﺎ
ﮔﻔﺖ
دﺭ ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺑ دﺭ
Ã{a
YÁa
YÁada
{ÊZ¼¸bË
ﻔﺤﻪ 1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎ ﻥ
116 /13 88ﺻ /
ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲﺳﺎﻝﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩﺷﺸﻢ 22 /ﺷ ﻬ ﺮ ﯾﻮ ﺭ
/
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥﺗ
ﺮﻱ ،
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺍﻩ
ﺧﻮ
ﺧﺒ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﻔﺘﻪ
ﺑﺮﻪ
ﻨﻪ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﺑﺮ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺁﻥ
ﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ ﺗﻫ
ﻴﺮﺭ
ﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻴﺮ
ﺗﺎﺛﺩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎیﻭﺛ
ﺳﺎی
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ ﺗﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﺭﻭ
ﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺑﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ
ﺕ
ﯾﮑﺎﺎ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻭﻭﺁﺤﻣ ﻮﺁﻣﺮﯾﻻﺮﮑ
ﻣﻮﻥ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﺮﻮﻥ
ﺍﻥ
ﺮﺍ ﯾﻣ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﻪ ﺍ
ﺑﻄﭘﻴ
ﺖ ﻭﺭ ﺍﮔﮔﻮﻮ
ﻞﻭ ﮔ ﻔﮔﻔﺖ
ﻴﻞ
ﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴ
1000ﺤ ﺗﻠ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ /ﺗ
ﻫﻔﺘﻢ29ﺷ ﻬ ﺮﯾﻮﺭ 116 /1 388
/
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺷ ﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﻫ ﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒ ﺮﻱ ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ /
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﯽ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝﺗﻘ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺍﻟ
ﺤﻤﺪ
ﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﺳﻼﻡ
ﺣﺠﺖ ﺍﺍﻻ ﻣ
ﺣﺠ ﺖ
MOSALAS.IR
¿^½ÂÌZÌÄ]Ä]|ËZ
¿^|ËZ
{|Á¨]½Z¼¸Ì§|¿Y
{{YY
{Y
ﻧﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎی 8ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺿﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩی ،ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ ﻣﻠﮑﻮﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﯾﻤﺎﻧﯽ ﺧﻮﺷﺨﻮ ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺷﺎﻟﻮﯾﯽ،ﺩﮐﺘﺮﺣﺴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﯽ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎﺷﺎﯾﺎﻥﻣﻬﺮ
¿^½ÂÌZÌ Ä] |ËZ
ºË{¯Ö» {Z¼fY
ﻧﺴﻞﮐﺸﯽ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﯾﻤﻦ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭی ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﭼﺮﺍ »ﭼﺎی ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺗﻘﻮﺍﯾﯽ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪ
ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺣﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﯾﺸﻪ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ
ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯی ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﻣﺸﺎﯾﯽ
]:Y ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
{ÁMZÅ°¨ÀÁ:Ê°¼¿Ã
{ÃÃ
{
ﻭﺭﺯﺵﺵ|:
Ì¿Ì¿YÂy
ﻴﺎﺳﯽﺩﺭÂyﻭﺭﺯY
»Ê
ﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﺩﺭ
¼ÃZﻭﺳﺳﻭ»Ê
¼ÃZ
ﻫﺎی
ﻫﺎی
ﺮﺍﻥ
ﻫﺎی
ﺍﻥ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﺳﺎﯾﺖﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮ
ﺳﺎﯾﺖ
ﺑﻄﻪ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﺍﺑﻄﯾ
¾ËYﺍ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺭﺭﺍ
ﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻭﻧﺪﻩ
¾ËY
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
{
{ ﭘﭘﺮ
: |Ì¿YÂy
»Ê
¼Ê»ÃZ
¼ÃZ
¾ËY
¾ËY
{ {
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
|¿Â »ZÌ]Y
]]Z» ÕY| °¿Z
:Z]ÊË
ÊËZųÁ
ZųÁ d¨³
ISSN: 2008-5281
ZË ©Y§ Z] Ä¿Z» º£
{§ÉYmZ» Y Z
»® §¾Ì·Z
ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﯾﺰ ﻣﺸﮑﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﻃﺒﻴﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺖ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﺍﺳ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺮﺏ
ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺎﯾﻴﺰی
ﯾﻴﺰی
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﻤﻪ
ﺮﺭ ﻏ
ﭘﺎ
ﺟﺎﯾﯽ،
ﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺎﻭ
ﺿﺮﺭ
ﺍﻥ
ﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺿ ﭘﻭﻫ
ﺑﻄﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮ
ﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎ
ﺮﻭﺯ
ﻬﺮﻩﺍ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﺭﺍﻋﺭ
ﻏﺮﺑﺰﺩﮔﯽﻭ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی،
ﺰﺩﮔﯽﻭﺍﻗ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﭼﻓﻴ
ﺮﯾﻤﯽ
ﺎﺭﻩ
ﺧﻮﺵ
ﺧﻮﺵ
ﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﺮﺑﺑﺍ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺭﺩ
ﻠﯽ
ﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﭼﻴﺰﻏ
ﺤﻤﺪ
ﺩﺭﮐ
ﺤﻤﺪ
ﭼﻴﺰ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻄﻴ
ﻤﻪﺳﻪ
ﻫﻤ
ﻫﻣﭘﺗﻌﻣ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪی
ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﯽ
ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﯽ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﻧﺪﻩ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﻧﺪﻩ
ﺷﻤﺴﻰ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎﮐﻼﻡ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭی
ﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﺟﻌﻔﺮ
ﺍﷲ
ﻭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﺟﻌﻔﺮ
ﺍﷲ
ﻭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻟﻄﻒ
ﻟﻄﻒ ﻣ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻴﮕﯽ،
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞﺩﺍ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﻴﮕﯽ،،
ﻓﺮﺍﺗﯽ،
ﺮﺍﺗﯽ،
ﺩﺍ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑ،
ﻣﺴﺠﺪﺟﺎﻣﻌﯽ،
ﻃﺒﺎ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻃﻼﯾﯽﻓ
ﻃﻼﯾﯽ
ﻮﻫﺎﺏ
ﺷﻤﯽ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺮﺗﻀﯽ
ﺗﻀﯽ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟ
ﺿﺎﻫﺎ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﺤﻤ
ﻣﺮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﻣ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ISS N : 200-58 28 1 MOS ALAS.
ﺮﯾﺎﺭی
ﺣﺴﻴ ﻨﻌﻠﯽ ﺷﻬ IR
»
¯|ÌÀ
[Yy
[YyY
Y ÀÅ
{ÀÅÁ d·Á
{:d·Á
´Âa
»½ZÌ
¼½ ZÌ»Õ{Z
Õ{Z¼fY
]fYÖ]Ö
{YÂË
{YÂË
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ 1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎ ﻥ
/
116/1 388
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﻩ ﺷﺸﻢ 22 /ﺷﻬ ﺮﯾﻮﺭ
ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲﺳﺎﻝﺍﻭ ﻝ /
/
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺮﻱ،ﺗ
ﺧﻮ ﺍﻩ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺧﺒ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺖ
ﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻗ
ﺑﺮﻴ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣ
ﺁﻥﻴﻨ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺁﻥ
ﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺗﺎﺑ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮐ
ﻧﺪﺍﺩﺭ
ﺩﺭ
ﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﺎی
ﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﻭﺳﺎﻧی
ﯽﻭ
ﺷﮕﺮ
ﺭﻭﯽ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﺭ
ﮔﺮﺩﻟﻮ
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﮕﺎﻩ
ﺍﺻ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﭼﺮﺍﺮﺍ
ﺑﺎﺷ
ﺑﭼ
» ZÀ¯{ : ½ZË n½Z³
«
ﺁﺑ ﺎدﻱ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ زﻧﻲ ﭘﻴﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﻥﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺗﻘﯽﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺍ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻡ
ﺍﻻﺳ ﻼ
ﺣﺠﺖ ﺍﻻ
ﺣﺠ ﺖ
´|ÌZ Â
] z ZaËZ « Á
{½]ºË Y
{Â]ZËÁ
Z|a
®Ë
»¦Ëv e ÉZm Ä:] Z Ì¿\nf À
|ÀÅY y Ê»ZÅ Ö̸ ´ ¿YÖ
] ] : À¼Æ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴ ﺖ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﺯﺍﺯ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠ؛ ﺚ؛
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
]:Y ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
]ÊËZ ÅZf¨³Z
ÉZÅÃ|Á
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟؟
ﮐﺮﺩ
ﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ ﺁ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻔﺮ ﺍ
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﻔﺮ
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺳﻪﺳ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧ
ﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪﺳ
ﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﺮﺍﻥ
ﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻫﺎی
ﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﻫﺎی
ﻣﺪﯾ
ﺧﻮ
ﮔﺸﺖﺑﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻭﻍ
ﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ
ﭼﻪ ﻣﺧ
ﺑﺮﺍیﺍﺮﺍﻓﺮ
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﻖ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﭼﺸﻢ
ی
ﺑﺮﺍ ﺑ
ﻌﻮﯾ
ﯽﻪ
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎﺯﻧﮐﮐﻪ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺍﯾﯽ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻞ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﻻﯾ ﺗ
ﻭﺯﺭ
ﻭﺩ
]:Z
: Z]ÊËZųÁ
ÊËZųÁd¨³
d¨³
{|¿{Y
§Ã|À^Ë
ﻃﺎﻫﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﯽ
ﺧﻮﺍﻥ
ﺎﺷﻤﯽﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ،ﻧﻴﺮﻩﺍ
ﯽ،
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ
ﻴﻌ ﻫ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌ
ﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻋﻠﯽﺭﻓ
ﮐﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺣ ﺴﻴﻨﯽ
ﺟﺎ ﺭ ﯾﺎﻧﯽ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ،
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻏﻼﻣ ﺤ ﺴﻴ ﻦ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
ﮐﻠﻲ
ﻤﺎدﺮﺗﻮ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎد
دﮐﺘ
دﮐﺘﺮ
ﺍﻋﺘ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ
ﺭﺍﻱﺑﺎ ﮔﻮ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭ
ﺳﻲﮔﻮ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖﺭﻭدﺭ
دﺭﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺑﺮ
Ã{a da
Ã{a
YÁa
{ÊZ¼¸bË
{ÊZ¼¸bË
ISSN : 2008-5 28 1 MOSALAS. IR
ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﻣﺜﻠ ﺚ؛
ﺻﻔ ﺤﻪ 1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺷﻬ ﺮ ﯾ ﻮﺭ 116 /1 388
ﺮﻱ ،ﺗ ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝﺍﻭﻝ ﺷ/ﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﭘﻨ ﺠﻢ15 /
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﺧﺒﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ
ﻮﻻﺕ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥﻮﻥ ﺗﺤ
ﯾﺮﺍﻥﺮﺍﻣ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻮﺍ ﭘﻴ
ﮔﻮ ﮔ
ﮔﻔﺖﮔ ﻔ ﺖﻭ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺗﺤ ﻠ ﻴ ﻞ ﻭ
1000ﻮﻣﺎﻥ
116 /1 388ﺻ ﻔﺤﻪ /ﺗ
29ﻬﺮ ﯾ ﻮﺭ
ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺳﺎ ﻝﺍﻭ /ﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩﻫﻔﺘﻢ /ﺷ
/
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺗ
]±] Ã|¿Z
: Z] ÊËZųÁd¨³
ﺷﺪﻥﺩﻫﻢ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﻭﻟﺖ
ﻴﺮ
ﺍﻟﺴ ﺩ
ﻟﺒﻪﻴﻎ
18
ﺳﺮﯾﻊﺗ
ﺭﻭی
ﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻣ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍی
14
ﺭ ﺍ
ﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽ
ﺮﻭﺯی
ﻘﯽ
ﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻌﻴﺪﻓﺎﺋ
ﻬﺪیﺩﺭﻓﺑﻬ
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﻴﺪ ﺳ
ﺑﺎﺩیﻭﻣ -
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
ﺠ
ﻓﺮﻣ -
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی ﺁ
ﻴﮋﻥ
ﺳﻼﻡ ﻠ
ﺤﻤﺪ
ﯽ ﺑ-ﻋ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﺮﻗ
ﺍﻻ
ﺣﺠﺖﻣ
ﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺖ
ﻮﻧﺪی -
ﺣﻤﻭﻴﺍﻗﻌﻴ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺁﺧ
ﺒﺎﺱ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠ ﺚ؛ ﻋ
ﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ
ﻫﺎیﺧ «
ﺑﺪﻧﯽ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭﻪ
ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺍﻥ
ISSN
ﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣ
ﺍی ﺮ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
: 20ﺍﯾ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝﻪﺭ
ﻫﺴ ﺘ
ﻫﺎی08
ﺘﺎﻧﻪ»
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
-528ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺎﺳ
ﺩﺭ
ﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ 1ﺳﺁ
ﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽﻩ
ﺭگ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
MO
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺸﮕﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ALAS.IRﺑﺰS
ﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﮔﻔﻧﺍ
ﻴﻞﮐﻴﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﻌﻮﺩ
ﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺤﻠ
ﺴﻪ
ﺁﻣﺮ
ﺧﺎﻧ
ﺳﻣﺗ
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦﺣ ﮑﻴﻢ -ﻋ ﺒﺎﺱﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ ﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫ ﺎﺷﻤ ﯽ -
MOSALAS.IR
{]É» Á ʼZÅ Ä]Y ÃZ
ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽﻧﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍی ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺑﻪ ﺭﻧﮓ ﺍﺭﻏﻮﺍﻥ«
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﮐﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﯽ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﯽ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺭﻓﻊﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ
ﺩﺳﺖﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎی ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﯽﮐﻴﺎ
ﮔﻮﺷﻪﺍی ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪﺭﻧﮓ ﺍﺭﻏﻮﺍﻥ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭘﺸﺖﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
]²¿ Ä
dZÌ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
،ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ ﻣ ﻮﻣﻨﯽ
،ﻓ ﺮﺷﺎﺩ ﻣ ﻮﻣﻨﯽ
»:Ê^Ì^u Ê^¿ |¼v
ºË{Y¿É|¼uY {ÂmÁ
¹Y|¿ µÂ^« Y
MOSALAS.IR
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻔﺪﻫﻢ 8/ﺁﺫﺭ 100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻲﻧﻴﺎ :ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ :ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ
ﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻳﻢ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ 3ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ 20ﺳﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﭘﺎﻧﺰدﻫﻢ 24/ﺁﺑﺎﻥ 100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻋﻠﯽ ﺧﺮﻡ ،ﻫﺎﺩیﻗﻮ ﺍﻣﯽ
،
،ﻋﻠﯽ ﺧﺮﻡ ،ﻫﺎﺩیﻗﻮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ ﻮﻣ ﻨﯽ
ﻣ
،
{Â
ÂƼ Ê
m¼ÌÅ
ÌW
Y]YºÅ
¹ÔÉÆ
ÓYdnu
»
Ó aZ¯{  §º¸Ì§ ¾Ëy M
»|À¯ Ê»¶¼ {Y¿ É|¼ uY¶j
Áfe à Z] {ÉYà |¿Á a
¯Ê ]Ô¬¿YÄ ¿Zy Z
{:|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
´Á Âa
3
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧـﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸـﻬﺮﻱ
ﺑـﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺣﻮﺍﺷـﻲ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣـﻮﻥ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ 24ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺷـﺪ ﺗﺎ ﮔﻼﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺒﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﺍﻧﺘﺸـﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﺸـﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﺟﺤﻴـﺖ ﭘﻴـﺪﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
48
51
62
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺷﺎﻡ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻫﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﻡ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ،ﭘﻨﺠﺸﻨﺒﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷـﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ
ﺩﻭﻫﻔﺘﻪﭘﻴﺶﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫﺷﺪ.ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﻧﺸﺴﺖﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻳﻰ،ﻛﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦﺍَﺷﺘﻮﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﺪ.
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺍﮔﺮﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺍﺛﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻃﻲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲ ﻳﺎﺑﺪﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ.ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ.
ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ 18.........................................................................................
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ،ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ20..........................................
ﻧﻤﺮﻩ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ 15ﺑﻮﺩ21...................................................
50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ 50ﺩﺻﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ22................................
ﻃﻠﻮﻉ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺯﺷﺮﻕ25..........................................................................
ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ27..........................................................
ﻫﻨﺪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ29.........................................................................................
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ30......................................................
ﭼﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ31.........................................................
ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ32............................................
ﺑﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ،ﺳﻔﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ32....................................................
ﻣﺮگ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ33...............................................................................
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ43......
ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺷﻮﺩﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ44.................
ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺣﺪﺍﺩﻋﺎﺩﻝ45 ...............................................
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺏ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺪ46................................................................
ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ47.....................
ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺳﻬﻮﻱ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ48.....................................
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ49............................................
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺳــﻨﺪﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ
ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻫﻠﻴﺖ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻲ62...................................................................
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ64..............................................................
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ65..........................................................
ﺩﻟﺒﺴﺘﮕﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺍﺳﺖ67............................
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ 70........................................................
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ71..................................................
ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﺭ ﺧﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻮﭼﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ72.......................................
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﻲ ﺯﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺻﻔﺖ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ،ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺩﻭ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
ﺍﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺑﻪﺷﻜﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺯﻩ ﻫﺮﻣﻲ34...............................................
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ 36....................................................
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺪﻋﻴﺎﻥ38...........................................................
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ40....................................
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ42.............................
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺗﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺣﻔﻆ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻋﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ
ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺑﺪﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﻥ 19ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺪﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ .
ﻭﺟﻪﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﻟﺤﻪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ -ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ؟52..................................................
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ 54..................................
ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ56...........................................................................
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻧﺎﺁﺷﻨﺎ57......................................................
ﺑﺪﻩﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ58...........................................................................
ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻫﮋﻣﻮﻧﻲ60..................................................................
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎپ ﻭ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻮﺷﻪ
ﻭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﺍﻋﻴﺎﺩ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭﻧﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ
ﺗﻮﺟــﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﭼﺸــﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﭘــﺎپ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃــﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺭﻭﻧﻖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ؟
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﭘﺎپ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ74.......................................................
ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ ﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻳﻢ76......................................................
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ
ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ :ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﺮ
ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺳﺮﺩﺑﻴﺮﻯ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮﻳﻪ:
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ :ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺷﻮﻗﻲ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﻴﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ:ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﺴﺮﻭﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ :ﺑﻬﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻬﺮﺟﻮ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ :ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﻧﺠﻲﭘﻮﺭ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ :ﺑﺎﺑﻚ ﻏﻔﻮﺭﻱﺁﺫﺭ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺷﻮﻗﻲ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ :ﺳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻮﺭﻭﺯﻱ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ :ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺷﺎﻛﺮ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻋﻜﺲ :ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮﻳﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ :ﺳﺠﺎﺩ ﺳﺎﻟﻚ -ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ -ﺁﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ -ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻩ ﺷﻔﻴﻌﻲ
ﺭﻭﺯﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﺪﺍﺭﻱ -ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺯﺍﺭﻉ -ﺍﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻰ -ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺍﻓﻀﻠﻲ -ﺯﻫﺮﺍ ﻛﻠﻬﺮﻱ
ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﭘﻮﺭ -ﻟﻴﻼ ﻟﻄﻔﻲ -ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﻳﻲ -ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻓﺘﺤﻲ -ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻃﺎﻫﺒﺎﺯ -ﺳﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻲ -ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻣﻮﻧﺎ ﻗﺎﺳﻤﻴﺎﻥ -ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ -ﻫﻮﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻱ -ﺁﺗﻮﺳﺎ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻴﺎﻥ -ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥ -ﺳﻴﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﻣﻴﺮﺧﻠﻴﻠﻲ
ﺁﺭﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺭﻭﺧﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ -ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺧﻠﻴﻔﻪ -ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺭﺑﻮﺷﻪ -ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺣﺴﻨﻰ
ﻓﻨﻲ:
ﮔﺮﺍﻓﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺻﻔﺤﻪﺁﺭﺍﻳﻲ :ﻧﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻠﻚﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ -ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻲ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ :ﻫﻮﻣﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻴﺎﻥ
ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ :ژﻳﻼ ﺷﺎﻛﺮﻱ
ﺣﺮﻭﻓﭽﻴﻨﻲ :ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺣﺸﻤﺘﻲ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ :ﺳﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﻣﻨﻲ -ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻗﻠﻲﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ :ﺑﻴﺘﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺎ
ﺑﺎﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﺯ :ﺍﻳﺮﺝ ﺭﺳﺘﮕﺎﺭ-ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺻﺎﻟﺢ-ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﻱ
73
10ﺳﺎﻝ ﺁﺭﻳﻦ
10ﺳﺎﻝﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﮔﺮﻭﻩﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯﻛﻪﺑﻪﺭﺍﺣﺘﻰﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥﺍﺯﻛﻨﺎﺭﺵﮔﺬﺷﺖ.ﻳﻚﺩﻫﻪ
ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥﮔﺮﻭﻩﺑﺎﻫﻤﺎﻥﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐﺍﺻﻠﻰﺍﺵ،ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺑﺎﻫﺮﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰﻳﻚﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻣﻬﻢﺍﺳﺖ.ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺭﺍ ﺛﺎﺑﺖﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪﻛﻪﻣﺎﻫﻢ ﮔﺎﻫﻰﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﻰ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺟﻤﻌﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ.
ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺷﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﻛﺴﺘﺮﻱ79......................................................................
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ؟80.....................................................................
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ81...................
ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ -ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ84.....................................
ﺟﺎﻩﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﺗﺎﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﻚ86......................................................
»ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ« ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺲ ،ﺩﺭﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ87..............
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤــﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺧﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺪﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺟﺴــﺘﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ.ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ
ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷــﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ
ﻣﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻲ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺣﺞ90........................................................................................
ﺳﻴﻄﺮﻩ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻜﻔﻮﺭﺕ91....................................
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻱِ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ92........................................................
ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻰ93.....................................................
ﺍﺯ ﻟﻄﻒ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺣﻖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ94.............................................
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ 96... ..........................................
ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ97..........................................................
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ
ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ
»ﻣﺜﻠﺚ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
30008312
SMSﻛﻨﻴﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺮﻉ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﺟﺰﻭﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ
ﺷﻮﻳﺪ
ﭼﺎپ
ﭼﺎپ :ﺭﻭﺍﻕ
ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ
ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ :ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻲ :ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻔﺖ ﺗﻴﺮ ،ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﺘﺢ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ،ﻧﺒﺶ ﻛﻮﭼﻪ ﻣﺒﻴﻨﻲ ،ﭘﻼﻙ ،121ﻭﺍﺣﺪ 11
ﺗﻠﻔﻦ88140544 :
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ 20ﺳﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ
ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻳﻦ ﺩﻫــﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺻﺪﺭﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻲ
ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﻟﻴﺒــﺮﺍﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﺳﻨﺘﻲ
ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ »ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﻛﺎﺭ« ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ »ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ« ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺒﺖ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰﮔﺮﺍ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺰﺑﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﺳﺎﺯ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺩ ،ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ،ﻓﻌﺎﻝﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﻜﺎﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺷﻬﺮ ،ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ؛ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ،ﻣﺤﻤــﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺷــﺪ .ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ
ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ
ﺷــﻜﺎﻑ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ
ﺭﻧــﮓ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻱ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﻣــﺰﺩ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎ ﺩﻱ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ،ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﻧﻮﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻧﺸــﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺎﻧﺶ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ 76ﺗﺎ 80
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻐﻔﻮﻝ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﺎﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻤﻨــﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ -ﻭ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻏﻨﻲ ﺩﺍﻣــﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ -ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ،ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺵ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ
ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺒﺖ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ،
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳــﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴــﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻓﺎﻫﻲ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ،
ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻖ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﻣﺘﻦ/ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺑﻜﺎﻫﺪ.
ﻃﻨﺰ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻳــﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ
ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱﺷــﺎﻥ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ،76ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻫﻢ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﺷــﻬﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺿﻌﻴــﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻴﺮﻣﺎﻩ ،1384ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ
ﺷﻜﺎﻑ 16ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺘﻦ /ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ
ﺁﻣﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻥ ﻃﺒﻘــﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﻪﺭﺥ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ .ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻲﺍﺵ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ 76ﺗﺎ 80ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ 16ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
6
ﭘﺮﻭﺳــﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻄﻲ ،ﻣﻨﺠﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﻏﻠﻴﻆ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﺍﻟــﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺿﻠﻊ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺿﻠﻊ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺬﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﺮﻭﺳﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺪﻝ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺷﻜﺎﻑﺯﺍ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ،ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻛﻪ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
) (1320 - 1380ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ 1320ﺗﺎ 1332ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺿﺎﺧﺎﻥ ،ﺁﻏــﺎﺯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ
ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻱ 28ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰﮔﺮﺍ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻟﻐﻮ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺗﻲ
ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﻭ ﺧﻠﻊ ﻳﺪ ﺭﻭﺳﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻫﺮ
ﺻﻨﻒ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﺖ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺩﺷــﻤﻨﻲ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺭژﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺧﺮﺩﻩﭘﺎ،
ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭘﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ؛ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ،ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺳــﻠﻄﻨﺖ .ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻩ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ 1332ﺗﺎ 1342ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴــﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳــﺘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﺭﺁﻣــﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻭ
ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﻱ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻗﺸــﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﺮﺩﻩﺑﻮﺭژﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺳﺮﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺋﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻴﺮﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺩﺭﻳﻎ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻦ/ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ
ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺯﻣﻴﻦﺩﺍﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻱ 28ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﺖ
ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝ - 1342ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻧﻬﻀﺖ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ -ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ -1357ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ -ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﺭﺿﻲ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻝ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺑﺮﺩ .ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺋﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ،ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﺘﺎﺋﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﺳﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺋﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫــﺎﻱ ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻨــﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ؛
ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻫﺎ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺷــﻬﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ.ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻗﺸــﺮﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺪﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ:
- 1ﻗﺸﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻻ :ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 1000
ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
- 2ﻗﺸﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺮﻓﻪ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺸﺮ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻐﺎﺯﻩﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
- 3ﻗﺸــﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﺣﻘﻮﻕﺑﮕﻴــﺮ :ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻗﺸــﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ،
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﮔﺎﺭﺍﻥ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻪ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
- 4ﻗﺸــﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺸــﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﭘﻨﺞ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔــﺮﻭﻩ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺷــﻬﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻭ
ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻭ
ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ
ﻭ ﭼﺸــﻴﺪﻥ ﻃﻌﻢ ﺑﻲﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺩﻳﻨــﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ
ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ،ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1357ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ -ﺳــﺎﻝ - 1368ﺭﺍ
ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﻲ ﭘﺮﻭﺳﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﻗﺸﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ
ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻗﺸــﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺭﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﻌــﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1368ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﺭﺍ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳــﻲ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱ
ﻓﺘﺮﺕ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺽ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﺎﻻ
ﺭﻓﺖ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ
ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﻫﻢ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ
ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﭘﻠﻮﺭﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ،
ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻜﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ
ﺷﻬﺮ/ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻧﺸــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷﻜﺎﻑﻫﺎ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺷﻜﺎﻑﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ،ﺷﻜﺎﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﺳــﻨﺖ /ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﺑــﻞ ﻫﻢ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧــﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ/
ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺷﻜﺎﻑ
ﺳــﻨﺖ /ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣــﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺗــﺎ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ /ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
ﺭﻓــﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈــﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻴﺰﻫﻮﺷــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺩﻫﻪ 80ﻭ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺶ ﻛــﺮﺩﻥ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻗﺸــﺎﺭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﺎﺗﻤــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺘﻲ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺳــﺎﺯﻱ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺒﺘﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴــﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻠﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴﺎ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻨﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻓﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻮﺭﭘﻮﺭﺍﺗﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﻧﺪﻳﻨﺎﻭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻝ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺵﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺭﻓﺘﻦ
ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ،ﺑﺮﺳــﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﺗﻜﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ /ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ /ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﻋﻤــﺮﺵ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻓﺎﻫﻲ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻓﺮﺻﺖ
ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ،ﻧﻬﺎﻟﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺿﻌﻴــﻒ ﺑــﻜﺎﺭﺩ .ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑــﺮ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺿﻌﻴــﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ،ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻣﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺷــﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻔﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎ ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛
ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ.
ﻣﺪﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴــﻚ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ
ﺑﺮ ﮔﺴــﻞ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ/ﻏﻨﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ،ﺭﺍﻩ
ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ،ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺜﻠــﺚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ -ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ -ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻭ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛
- 1ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﺵ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ
ﺁﻥ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ
- 2ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻓﺎﻫﻲ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰﮔﺮﺍ ،ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﺷــﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺩﺍﺩ .ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻏﻠﻈﺖ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﭼــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﺒﺎﺽ ﻭﺍﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ -ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ،ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ،
ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻓﻦﺳــﺎﻻﺭﺍﻥ -ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺑﺎﻻﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ .ﺑﺎ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ
ﻭ ﺍﻟﻴﮕﺎﺭﺷﻲ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺳﻄﻮ -ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺴــﻴﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣــﺖ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﺭﺍ »ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳــﻦ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ« ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧــﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﺍﺵ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣــﺖ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻤﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ
ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﻭ ﻛﺸــﻤﻜﺶ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﭘﻨــﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ؛
»ﭘﻮﻟﻴﺘﻲ« ) (Polityﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳــﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺐ
ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ .ﺳﺴــﺖ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ،
ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺰﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻡ
ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ/
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻍ ﺑﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺎﻫﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺗﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍﻧﺘﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻧﺴــﭙﺎﺭﺩ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺰﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺻﺪﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ 96ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ
ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﻜﺎﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﻏﻴﺮﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﻡﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ
ﻧﺒﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺗﻰ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ »ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻯ«» ،ﻧﻮﺳﺎﺯﻯ«» ،ﺗﻌﻤﻴﺮ«» ،ﺑﻨﺎﻛﺮﺩﻥ«،
»ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ« ﻭ »ﺁﺑﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ« ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺁﺑﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ،ﺯﺩﻭﺩﻥ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻃﺎﻏﻮﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ،ﺧﻮﺩﺳﺎﺯﻯ،
ﺗﻘﻮﺍ ﻭ ...ﻣﻴﺴــﺮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺁﺩﻣــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻭﺳــﻴﻌﺘﺮ ﻭ
ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﻓﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﺩﺭﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻯﺍﺧﻴﺮﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺭﺍﻋﻼﻭﻩﺑﺮﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ،
ﻻﻛﻦ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻝ ﻭ
ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﺷﺮﻋﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺭﺍﻱ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺗﻰ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﻰ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﻣﺰﺑﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ:
.1ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺖ .2ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ )ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠــﻰ( .3ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﻳﺎ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ .4ﻋﺪﺍﻟــﺖ .5ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭﺿﻊ
ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﺎﻥ.
-1ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺖ :ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺖ ،ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻫﺮ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻙ ﺑﺸﺮﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ
ﺑﺸﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻧﺎﻗﺺ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺘﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
»ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ«.
»ﺍﮔﺮ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺷﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ«.
»ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺪﺑﺨﺘﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺴﺘﻰ ﻳﻘﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
»ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺧﺪﺍ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺷــﺌﻮﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻣــﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺟﻬــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳــﺎﻧﻰ ﺣﻞ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ«.
-2ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ :ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝﻓﻜﺮﻯﻭﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺑﻬﺎﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ».ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦﻓﺎﺟﻌﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺮﺏ]ﺍﺳﺖ[ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ«.
»ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻌﻤﺖﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
»ﻣﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﺋﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﻣﻠﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ
ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
»ژﺍﭘﻦﻫﻤﻴﻦﻣﻌﻨﺎﺭﺍﻣﺒﺘﻼﺑﻮﺩﻭﺑﻌﺪﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭﺷﺪﻭﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩﻛﺮﺩﻭﺷﺪﻳﻚ
ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰﻛﻪﺍﻻﻥﺻﻨﻌﺖﺍﻭﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪﺑﺎﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ«.
»ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻧﮋﺍﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻏﻴﺮﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ«.
-3ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳـﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ )ﻣﻠـﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ(:
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﺗﺤــﺎﺩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨــﻰ ﺍﻳﺠــﺎﺩ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺑﻴــﻦ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ -ﺍﻻ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﻰ »ﻭﺍﻋﺘﺼﻤﻮﺍ ﺑﺤﺒﻞﺍﷲ ﺟﻤﻴﻌﺎ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﻮﺍ«ﺟﻤﻊ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺤﻜﻢ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ» .ﺑﺮ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﻠﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﻭﺍﺟﺐ
ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻜﺪﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻳﻜﺪﻝ ﻭ
ﻳﻚ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺮﺍﺏ«.
»ﻫﻤــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤــﺖ ﻭﺍﻻ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺧــﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺿﺎﻯ ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﺳﻼﻡﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﺮﺍﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ«.
»ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ،ﺯﺍﺭﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺯﺍﺭﻉ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ،ﺍﻫﻞ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ
ﺻﺎﻧﻊ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻗﺸــﺎﺭ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ،
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺳﺖﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﺮﺍﺑﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺵ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
-4ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ :ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻨﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
»ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﻭ ﺻﺮﺍﻁ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ«.
»ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ]ﺑﺮﺍﻯ[
ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ«.
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻛﺮﻳﻢ ﻗﺴﻂ ﻭ
ﻋﺪﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻞ ﻭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
»ﻟﻘﺪ ﺍﺭﺳــﻠﻨﺎ ﺭﺳــﻠﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺰﻟﻨﺎﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﺰﺍﻥ
ﻟﻴﻘﻮﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﺴﻂ«
-5ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﺎﻥ :ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻫﺪﻑ
ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
»ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
»ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺗﻰ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ«.
»ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺷﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻭﺻﻴﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﺕ ﺷــﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
»ﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴــﺘﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺭﻓﺎﻫﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ -ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ
ﺑﺮﺳﻨﺪ«.
»ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻧﻈﺮﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ«.
»ﺧﺪﺍ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻣﺎ ،ﭘﺸــﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﻜﺮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﻯ ﻛﺎﺥﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺿﺎﻯ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
7
8
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺠﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺴﻴﺠﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻣﺰ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ،ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻋﺰﺕ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻣﻮﻛﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ،ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺻﻮﻟﻲ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ،
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﺣﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ،ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﺼﻴﺮﺕ ،ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺠﻲ ،ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺖ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺﻫﺎﺳﺖ«.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ،ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﻫﺮ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻐﺸــﻮﺵ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖﺁﻟﻮﺩ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺪﺑﻴــﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺑﻪﺿﺮﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ «.ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻣﻨــﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻧﺪ» :ﻣﻦ ﺍﺻــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺁﺣﺎﺩ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺘﺤــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ «.ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺟﺪﺍﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻋﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻡ
ﺑــﺎ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ،ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ،ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻐﺸــﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳــﺮﺩﺭﮔﻢ ﻭ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻦ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ «.ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ،ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ،ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﻪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻧﺪ» :ﺑﻪﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺻﻮﻟﻲ ﺻﺮﻓﻨﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﻬﻤﺖﺯﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﻪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺿﺪ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻋﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻗﻮﻩﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻤﻊﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻡ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻇﻦ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ«.
9
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻋﻜﺲ:ﺁﺭﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺭﺯﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌﺎﻥ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ
ﺭﺯﻣﺎﻳــﺶ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌﺎﻥ ﺁﺳــﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ 2ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ .ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺳــﺮﻳﻊ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﻮﺷــﻚﻫﺎگ ﻭ
ﺗﻮپ 8ﻗﺒﻀﻪﺍﻱ 20ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻤﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺭﺯﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﺮ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺯﻣﺎﻳﺶ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﭘﺪﺍﻓﻨﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪﻫﻮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻨﻬﺪﻡ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﺩﺯﺍﻱ ﺟﺒﺎﺭ 9ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺭﺯﻣﺎﻳﺶ
ﺑﺎﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺷﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
10
11
ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ
ﻋﻜﺲ :ﭼﺎﻭﺵ ﻫﻤﺎﻭﻧﺪﻱ
ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﭗ 2009
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﭗ 2009ﺩﺭ 40ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺘﺮﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﻭ 10ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﺮﺍژ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ 20ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺘﺮﻣﺮﺑﻊ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣﭗ 2009ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ 15ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ 500 .ﺷﺮﻛﺖ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ 80ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ 14ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺷــﻮﺭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
15ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
12
13
ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎ
ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻘﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻯ ﺭﻯ ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺞ ،ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻡﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺍﻟﺤﺠﺎﺝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺎﻧﺶ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ .ﻭﻯ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺼﻴﺮﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ.
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺼﻴﺮﺕ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ -ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻲﺑﺼﻴﺮﺗﻲ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﺑﺼﻴﺮﺕ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺪﺍ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺕ،
ﻫﻤﺼﺪﺍ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻝ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻱ ﻣﺮگ
ﻛﺮﺩ؟ ...ﻭﺍﷲ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﺍﺿﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻛﺴﻲ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻜﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ
ﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﻳﺤﺎ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﭘﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻮﻓﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ( ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺣﺠﺎﺯ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮ)ﺹ( ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﺍﺋﻤﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺠﺰﺍﺕ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮ)ﺹ( ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ،ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺋﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻳﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﺳــﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺳﻲ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﺳﺨﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ،ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺲ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﻋﺼﻤﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺼﻴﺮﺕ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ
ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻭ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ؟«
14
ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻛﻴﺎﺭﺳﺘﻤﻲ
ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻛﻴﺎﺭﺳــﺘﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻛﻲ ﺑﺎ »ﭘﺮﻭﻳــﺰ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﻲ« ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﺑﻲ ﺑﻪﺳــﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ﻗﺒﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ،ﻃﺮﺡ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻻﺗﻲ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﺮﮔﺸﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻡ
ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﺮﮔﺸﺎﺩﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳﺖﺷﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻈــﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺎﺵ ﺻﺮﻳﺢﺗﺮ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ«.
ﻛﻴﺎﺭﺳــﺘﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺑﻪﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻗﺒﺎﺩﻱ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳــﺪ» :ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻗﺪﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗــﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ – ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺲ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ ﻫﺮ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧــﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻳﻢ؟ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ؟ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﻬﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺵ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻛﺴﻲ
ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻢ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﺍﻭﻻ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﻧﻪ ﺣﻜﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟«
ﺩﺭﻙ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﻴﺎﺭﺳﺘﻤﻲ ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻘﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﺮﺍﺩﻑ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻛﻴﺎﺭﺳﺘﻤﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺷﻤﺎ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺎﻭﺭﺍﺱ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺳﺮﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻳﺪ؟ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ؟«
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺒﺘﻼ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺨﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﻳﻮﻯ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺎﺭﺿﻪ
ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺳــﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﻮﺭﻯ ﻓﻮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩ.ﻧﺎﻡ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻛــﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻲ
ﺗﻘﻠﺒﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺑﺮﻛﻨــﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﻭﺯﻳــﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻀﺎﺡ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﮕﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻒ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺟﻌﻠﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻣــﺪﺭﻙ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﻯ ﻛــﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴــﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ:
»ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﻰ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻞ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻛﺴﻔﻮﺭﺩ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻔﻦ ﭘﺮﻳﻨﮕﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﻛﺴــﻔﻮﺭﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺧﺪﺷﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ «.ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﻋﺎﻗﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﻛﭙﻰ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻛﺴﻔﻮﺭﺩ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻔﻦ ﭘﺮﻳﻨﮕﻞ -ﻛﻪ ﻗﺒﻼ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ -ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺍﻣﻼﻳﻰ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﻓﺎﺣﺶ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻛﺴــﻔﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻨﻔﻰ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻛﺴﻔﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻗﺎﺿﻰ ﻓﻴﻠﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺳــﭙﺲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﻗﺘﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻰ ﻭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻏﺬﭘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﻃﺮﺡ
ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻀﺎﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺯﺍﻛﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺤﺺ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ،ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﮔﻢ ﺷﺪﻥ ﭘﻴﺎﭘﻰ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺳﻮﺍﻻﺕ ﻛﻨﻜﻮﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻋﻨﺼﺮﻯ ﻧﺎﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﺎﺟﻌﻪ
ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ ،ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺶ ﭘﺮ ﺭﻧﮓ ﺩﺍﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺯﺍﻛﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ» :ﻣﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻮﻱ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺷــﺎﻫﺮﻭﺩﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻮﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻱ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻮﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺩﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻦ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﻮ ﻛﻨﻢ
ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻑ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ«.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﻌﻴﺪ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺯﺍﻛﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻗﺼﺪ
ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺯﺍﻛﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﺶ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 23ﻗﺒﻼ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻛﺬﺏ ﻭ ﺑﻰﻣﻌﻨﺎﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻲ
ﺗﻮﻣﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻳﻠﻲﻛﻬﻦ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻋﻠﻰﺍﻛﺒﺮﻭﻻﻳﺘﻰ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪﺳﺎﺑﻖ،
ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ،ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ،ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸــﻰ
ﺩﻭ ﻗﺪﻡ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺒﺢ ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﮔﻔﺖﻭﺷﻨﻮﺩ
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺭﺿﺎ ﭘﻮﺭﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ،
ﻋﻠﻤــﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨــﻰ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧــﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳــﺶ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﭘﻮﺭﺣﺴﻴﻦ ،ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻧﺜﺮ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻯ ﺳﻌﺪﻯ
ـ ﻋﻠﻴﻪﺍﻟﺮﺣﻤــﻪ ـ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺜــﺮ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻘــﺶ ﻣﻜﺘﺐﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻯ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ
ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻦ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ،ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺜﺮ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻰ ﺑﺮ
ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺳﻌﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩﮔﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺴﻞ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺜﺮ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻣﻰﻳﺎﻓﺖ «.ﻭﻯ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ:
»ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺶﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﺭﻯ ﺟﺴﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﺜﺮ ﭘﺮﻏﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻰ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺳﻌﺪﻯ ﻋﺎﺟﺰﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺜﺮ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻰﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ «.ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻰ ،ﺳﻔﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻌﺪﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻧﺜﺮ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻯ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩﮔﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻚﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﭼﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﭼﻪ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺳﻌﺪﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻗﻠﻪ ﺭﻓﻴﻊ
ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻧﺜﺮ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻯ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻰ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ،ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻰﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻰ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻗﺴﻤﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﻦ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﺎﻥ ﻫﺨﺎﻣﻨﺸﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ،ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻰ
ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺖ.
»ﻣﻦ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺰﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻟﻤﺲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﻣﻌﺘﻘــﺪﻡ ﺻﻔﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣــﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﭼﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻧﺴﺒﻲﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺟﺎﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻡ ،ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻭ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺷــﻮﺩ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﺭﻓﺖﻭﺁﻣــﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑــﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ
ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﺎﻳﻠﻲﻛﻬﻦ ﻛﻪ 4ﺳﺎﻝ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﮔﻤﻨﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ 84ﺍﺯ ﻭﻱ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺮﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺪ
ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﻭ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ » :ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦﻣﻴﺎﻥﻣﺤﺴﻦﺻﻔﺎﻳﻲﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻲ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺳﺎﺑﻖﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝﺟﺰﻭﻧﻔﺮﺍﺗﻲﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.ﺑﻪﺗﻮﻣﺎﺭﻧﻮﻳﺴﻲﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡﺍﻣﺎﺍﮔﺮﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝﻣﻦﺭﺍﻗﺎﺑﻞﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪﺣﺎﺿﺮﻡﭘﻴﺸﻘﺪﻡﺷﻮﻡ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺮﺟﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﺮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻭ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺣﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺻﻔﺎﻳﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﻨﺸﺎء ﺍﺛﺮﺍﺕ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻡ «.ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺳﺎﻳﭙﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺵﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺗﻴﻢﻧﻴﺰﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺯﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕﺍﻭﺳﺖﺧﻴﻠﻲﻣﺸﺨﺺﻧﻴﺴﺖﭼﻪﺁﻧﻜﻪﺩﺭﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻴﻢﺑﺮﺳﺮﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱﺑﺎﻣﺎﻳﻠﻲﻛﻬﻦﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲﻭﺟﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﺩﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲﻛﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻳﭙﺎ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ.
15
16
16
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺍﮔﺮﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺍﺛﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻃﻲ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﻣﻲ ﻳﺎﺑﺪﻭﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ.ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ.
17
ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺷﺎﻛﺮ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑــﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺮﻥ ﭘﻴــﺶ ،ﭼﺎﺭﻟﻲﭼﺎﭘﻠﻴﻦ ﺑــﺎ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
»ﻋﺼــﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ« ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻃﻨﺰ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻭ ﺷــﻜﻮﻩ
ﮔﺸﻮﺩ .ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻭﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
»ﻋﺼﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ« ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻭ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﭼﺎﭘﻠﻴﻦ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺎﻡﺁﻭﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﭘﻴﭻ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺮﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﺑﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ .ﭼﺮﺥﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻋﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻓﺰﻭﻥ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻃﻲ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﺎ
ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ،ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ.
ﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻭ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ،ﺁﺭﺍﻡﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻠﻮﻙ ﻣﻤﺎﻟﻚ
ﻏﻴﺮﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺨﺪﻭﺵ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺷــﺮﻗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﻤﻮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻡ ژﺍﭘﻦ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺴــﻠﻴﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﮕﺮﺍﻥ ژﺍﭘﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺨﺘﻜﻮﺷﻲ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
»ﺁﻛﻴﻮ ﻣﻮﺭﻳﺘﺎ« ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﺳﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻳﻢ
18
ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ«.
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﻇﻬﻮﺭ
ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ،ﻛﺮﻩﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ،ﻣﻜﺰﻳﻚ ،ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ،ﺳــﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﻭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﮔﺮﭼﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﮔﻪ ﻣﻤﺎﻟﻚ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ
ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻧﺎﭘﻠﺌــﻮﻥ ﺑﻨﺎﭘﺎﺭﺕ ﺯﻣﺎﻧــﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻳــﻚ ﺍژﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻔﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍژﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﺑﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺘﺤﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﺎﭘﻠﺌﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﺏ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺳــﺮﻳﻊ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺘﺤﻴﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻴﻦ
ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﺴــﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺑﻪﺣﺴﺎﺏ
ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻫﻪ 1970ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﺷــﺪ ،ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖﺳــﺮ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻓﺮﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻲ ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﺭ
ﺑﺮ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﻤﻮﺩ .ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﻫﻨﺪ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﻭ
ﻋﻘﺐﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴــﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻲ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲﺑﺮ
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳــﭙﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺷﻜﻮﻓﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺳﻮﻕ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻤﻊ 10ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺻﺎﻑ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﺳﻒ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻃﻲ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺴــﺘﻤﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭ
ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺻﺪﻭﭘﻨﺠﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺎﻥﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱﻏﺮﺑﻲﺑﻪﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖﻭﺗﺮﻗﻲﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪﻧﺪ،
ﻧﺎﺻﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻩ ،ﺁﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻈﻔﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻩ ،ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻋﻜﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺳﻮﻏﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﻏﻢﺑﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﮔﺬﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦﺑﺎﺭ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻗﺎﺟــﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺩﺳــﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ،ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ،ﻗﻔﻘﺎﺯ ،ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ،ﻫﻨﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺼﻼﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳــﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺳــﻴﺎﺣﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺸــﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ
ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺴﺮﻳﻊ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ،ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺑﻨﺎﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﻨﺎﻳﻲ
ﺟﺒﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤــﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻬﻠــﻮﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺮﺳــﻴﺪ .ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺩﻫﻪ ﭼﻬﻞ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩ ﮔﺎﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺟﻨﮓ 8ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﺯﻳﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻘﺐ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺖ
ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﻫﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺯﻳﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻛﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻛﻨﺪﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ ،ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺳﻲ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﺎﻧﻮﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ،ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻣﻮﺷــﻜﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺳــﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪ
ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻘﺐﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣــﻲ ،ﻣﻮﺷــﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺑــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴــﻦ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻛﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻘﺐﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻴﭙﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ
)ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻴــﻼﺩﻱ( ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺗــﺮﻙ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﻭﺯﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﻧﻄﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻠﻲ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 2008ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺟﻬﺎﻧــﻰ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ )ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺖ ﺁﻥ
ﻧﻴﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺣﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ( ،ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ 795ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ 385ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻓﻖ ﺳــﺎﻝ ) 1404ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺳﻨﺪ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ 20ﺳﺎﻟﻪ( ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ،ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ،
ﻗﻔﻘــﺎﺯ ،ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻫﻤﺴــﺎﻳﮕﺎﻥ
ﺷﺮﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ
ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻧﻔﺖﺧﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻧﻔﺘــﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﺼــﺮﻑ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺸــﻜﻪ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2008ﺭﺍ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 70ﺩﻻﺭ
ﻣﺤﺎﺳــﺒﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺸــﻜﻪ ﻧﻔﺖﺧﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ ) 2/4ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺸــﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺎﻧﻴﻢ( ،ﺳــﺎﻻﻧﻪ 100ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ
ﻧﻔﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺟﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﺴﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ 285ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺴــﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺳــﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪﻗﺪﺭﺗﻰ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻰ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻤﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻭ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﺸــﻨﺞ ﭘﺮﺁﺷﻮﺏ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ،ﺑﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺖ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﺧﺎﻡ
ﻣﺘﻜﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﺧﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ،ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ،ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻜﻰ
ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺗﻮﺭﻳﺴــﻢ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﺏ
ﺯﻣﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ.
ﺍﻧﺒــﻮﻩ ﻛﺎﻻﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫــﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ -ﻣﺜﻼ -ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪ
ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓــﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻔــﻆ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ
ﻣﻮﻧﺘﺎژﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺷــﺘﻪ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺑﺸــﻮﻳﻢ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﻩﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ،ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻱ ،ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ...ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻳﻢ!
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ »ﻋﺼــﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ« ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺖ،
ﻣﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﭼﺎﭘﻠﻴﻦ.
19
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ،ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﺮﻙ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺳﺮﻳﻊﺍﻟﻘﻠﻢ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺑﻬﺸﺘﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ،ﺭﺷــﺪ
ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﮕﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﮔــﺮﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪ ﺛــﺮﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳــﻖ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺛﺮﻭﺕ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﻣﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ،ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ،ﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﻛﻮﺑﺎ ،ﻛﺮﻩﺷﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﻳﻚ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ،ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺍﻧﺪﻭﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ،ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻫﺮ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ،ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺸﺘﻘﺎﺕ
ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴــﻞ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ،ﺑﺎﻧﻜﺪﺍﺭﻱ ،ﺍﺷــﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﻄﺎ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻘﻴﺐ ﻭ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺳــﭙﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺧﺬ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ،ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻮﻉﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲﻭﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﻋﺼﺮﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ،ﻛﺮﻩﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﻱﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ
ﺗﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺜﺎﻝ 96 ،ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﺎﻏﻞ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ 90ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺍﺧﺬ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ،ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﭘﻚ ،ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷﺎﻏﻞ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻞ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ
ﻧﻔﺖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍﻧﺘﻴﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺭﺍﻧﺘﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺗﺤﺖﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﻉ ﻓﺮﺍﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺭﺷﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦﺣﺎﻝ ،ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ،ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻭ ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 1960ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻱ
ﻭ ﻛﺮﻩﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺒﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺮﻩﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ
20
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻏﻠﻈﺘﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪﺗﺮ ،ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻱ ،ﻛﺮﻩﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ
ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻛﻠﻲﺗﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻤﺪﻧﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺷــﺮﻳﻚ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺷــﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ
ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘــﺪﺍﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻴــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﺎﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺭﺍﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﻣﺴــﺘﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ
ﺁﻥ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﺸﺮﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ -ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ -ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖ
ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﻫﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ،
ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺍﺧﻴــﺮﺍ ﻣﺤﻘﻘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺁﻳــﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻣﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘــﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ »ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺟــﻲ« ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﺮ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﺮﺽ ﺑﺮﻣﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ژﺍﭘﻦ ،ﺳﻮﺋﺪ
ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮ
ﻋﻤﻴﻘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﺩﻏﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ،
ﻧﺰﺍﻉﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ،
ﺣﻞ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﻊﺍﻧﺪ .ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺑﺮﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﻩ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ،
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ،
ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﻭ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺷﻮﻙﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﻙ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ،ﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﻮﻛﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖ
ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺻﺪﻕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺨﺶ ﭼﭗ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺟﻲ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ
ﺑﺎﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺟﻲ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﻮﻙﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﭗ
ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻮﻣــﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﻳﻚﻃﺮﻓﻪ ،ﺍﺯ ﭼﭗ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺷﻮﻙﻫﺎ،
ﺧﻄﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲﻫﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﭘﻚ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺟﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻔﺖﺧﻴﺰ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ
ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﺍﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸــﻴﺐ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻧﺰﻭﺋﻼ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺯﻭﻧﺸﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺮﻭژ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺮﻭژ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻣﻼﻙ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻔﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻤﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﺯﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ
ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ،ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﮕﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺮﻩﺷﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺑﺎ ﭘﻮﻝ ،ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻮﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻮﺑﺎﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ
ﺣــﺪﻭﺩ ﺻﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺻــﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻣﻌﺎﺵ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻــﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻜﻠــﻒ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺷــﺄﻥ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻮ ﻃﺒﻊ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻴﺐ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ .ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺟﻲ
ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ،ﻓﻀــﺎﻱ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻭ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﻭ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﻩﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ،ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻱ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﺑﺎ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺛﺮﻭﺕﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺳﻤﺖ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺟﻲ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ،ﻳﻠﺘﺴﻴﻦ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻤﻲﻛﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻃﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﻴﺶﺭﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﺮﺝ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺝ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺳــﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ،ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ،ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺰﺑﻲ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﺮ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺪﺩﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ،ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﻮﻳﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ ،ﺳﻨﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ،ﭘﻮﻝ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻳﺖ ﺣﺰﺑﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ،
ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ،ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻮﮔﺴﻼﻭﻱ ،ﺗﻴﺘﻮ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﻴﻢ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻓــﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧــﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎ ،ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ،
ﺩﻧﮓ ﺷــﻴﺎﺋﻮﭘﻴﻨﮓ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺗﻴﺘﻮ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻳﻮﮔﺴﻼﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺷــﺪ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﺪ .ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻳﻮﮔﺴﻼﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺳﭙﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻭ ﺍﻗﻤﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﻕ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺩﻫﻴــﻢ «.ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺳﻔﺮ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺳﻨﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ )ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺭﻭﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﺷــﺮﻕ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ( ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺗﻴﺘﻮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ
ﺳﺎﺯﻭﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻳﻚﺳﻮﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻴﺘﻮ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2020ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲﺷﺮﻕ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢﺳــﻄﺢ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻭ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻃﻲ 15ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻮ ﻃﺒﻊ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻳﻮﮔﺴﻼﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ 120 ،ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﭼﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺗﻴﺘﻮ
ﻭ ﻧﺴﻞﻛﺸﻲ ﻏﻮﻃﻪﻭﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮگ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪﺷــﺮﻕ
ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻴﺐ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1980ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ
ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻫﻪ ،1980ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻮﮔﺴﻼﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ
ﻓﻜــﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻤﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﺭﻭﺳﻮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻤﻲ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻱ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑــﻪ ﺑﺸــﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬــﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﻥ
ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ .ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻑ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻛﻼﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺮﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ.
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑــﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸــﻤﻮﻝ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻭ
ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻴﺘــﻮ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺮگ ﺍﻭ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ،ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﻣﺴــﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﮕﻲ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﻛﻼﻥ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﺯ
ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻋﺎﻣﻪ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﮕﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﺪ .ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺷــﺪ
ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻃﺮﻑ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺟﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻃﻲ ﺑﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳــﺎﻝ ،ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺑــﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺑﻲ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ
ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻃﻲ ﺭﺑﻊ ﻗﺮﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ،ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﻄﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
21
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻓﺎﺧﺮﻱ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺳﻬﻴﻼ ﻃﺎﺋﻲ
ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﭘﺮﺳـﺮﻋﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﺳﻮﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻣﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ،
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺳﻮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺳـﻌﻪ ﺑﭙﻴﻮﻧﺪﺩ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺳـﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﺩﻭﻧﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻓﺎﺧﺮﻱ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ
ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻥ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻻ ،ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳـﻌﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﭼﻴـﻦ ،ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ،
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭘﻴﺸﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ G20ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﻚﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ -ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱﺷﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺸﻲ
ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻨﺪ ﻣﻼﻙﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﮕﻲ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ
ﺗﺨﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﺮﻱ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻜﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ 32ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺟﺰﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
22
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ 32ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 135ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺮﻩ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ 49 .ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ
ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻳﻚﺟﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺷﻤﺮﺩ .ﺳﺎﻳﺰ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ -ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻓﺎﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﻛﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﮓ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷـﺎﺧﺺ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺭﺷـﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ ،ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻴﻦ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﺍﻭﻳـﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ،
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴـﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﻳﺪ
ﻳــﻚ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬــﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ
ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ 4/5ﺗﺎ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﭘﻨﺞ
ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ 10ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ .ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺷﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻪﺭﻏــﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺛــﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ
ﺑــﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺣﻜﻤﻔﺮﻣﺎﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻗﺴــﻤﺖ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ 10ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﭘﻨﺞ
ﺗﺎ 10ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭼﻨﺪﺗﺎ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺷﻤﺮﺩ .ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻧﻘﺶ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭼﺸﻤﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﻭ
ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾﺁﻣﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ
ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ،ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻇﺮﻑ 30ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ،
ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﮕﺮﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ،ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﮕﺮﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲﺷــﺪﻥ ﺳــﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺸﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﻌﻨﻲﺍﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﭘﺮﻭﺳــﻪ ﻋﺎﺩﻻﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ .ﺟﻤﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳــﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﮔﺮﺍ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ 30ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺳﻨﺪ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻴﻠــﻲ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺩﻩﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻳﻚ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺣﺴﺎﺏﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ
ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻩ 145ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﭼﻨﺪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻓﺴــﺎﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ 180ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻩ 168ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺩﻩﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺍﻻﻥ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺑﺮﺩﻳﺪ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻼ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ
ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺠﻤﺎﻥ
ﻃــﻲ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴــﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺸــﺪ .ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻬﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ
ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺳــﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻲ
ﺳــﺎﻝ ،ﻳﻚﺳﻮﻡ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1356ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻭ
ﺗﺸﻮﻳﻖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣـﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺳـﻬﻢ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺳـﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺑﺮﺳـﺪ .ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ؟
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﻻﻳﻠﺶ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺠــﺎﺭﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﮔــﺮ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ
ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺳــﭙﺲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﻣﻘــﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﻫﻴﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻪ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻳﻚﺳﺮﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷــﻴﻢ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﺠﺎﺕ
ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻫﻤﻪﺷﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻛﺎﻫــﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺯﻣﺎﻧــﻲ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈــﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﺪﻱﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﺼﺪﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺷــﺘﻐﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﺍﺟــﺰﺍﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣــﻞ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻭ
ﺗﺸﻮﻳﻖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻧــﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺸــﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻤﻨﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳــﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺳــﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ 34ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ
ﺳﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺟﺰﻭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ
ﺳﻮﺋﻴﺲ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻠﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣﺤﻞ
ﻛﺴﺐ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﻟﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﺭﻳﺨﺖ،
ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﺭﻙ ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻲﺷــﺎﻥ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﺎﺭﻙ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﻫﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﺭﻙ ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻠﺰﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺍﺯ 600ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﻣﺎﺭﻙ ﻭ ﻳﻮﺭﻭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ
ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻼﻧﻲ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺳﻪ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻬﻢ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻬﻢ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺍﺳﺖ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ
ﺗﺎ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻴﻢ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﻧــﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﺷﻤﺎﻥ
ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳــﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﺸــﻮﻳﻢ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺸــﻢ ﻣﻬﺮ ،ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﻱ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻱﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻴﻦ 16ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ 15ﺳﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ
16ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﺮﺳــﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﭙﻴﻮﻧﺪﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻗﺶ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ،ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ
ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻗﺪﻡ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲﺗﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻛﺮﻩﺷـﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺑﺎ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺗﺼﺪﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻱ ﺷـﺒﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﺑﺒﺮﻳﻢ ،ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﻌﻠﻲﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﭼﻴﻦ
ﻭ ﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 10ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻦ
ﻓﻜــﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﻫﻢ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ
ﭘﺎﻧﺰﺩﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﻧﺰﺩﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺿﻤﻦ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨــﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﺣﻞ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ،ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺣﺴﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ
23
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺠﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﮕﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ .ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻭ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻇﺮﻑ ﺳﻪ ﻣﺎﻩ،
ﺷﺶ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻟﻮﻻ
ﺭﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﻻﺗﻴﻦ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩ
ﻛﺮﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺿﻤﻨﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺴﺖ
ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ
ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﺎﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ .ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭﺧﻴﻢ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ؟
ﻣــﻦ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻡ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﮕــﻮﻱ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱﻣﺎﻥ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﺮﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺰﺭگ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻳﻚ
ﻗﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺗﻖ ﻭ ﻓﺘﻖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻛﻨﻴــﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻐﻞ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﻭ ﺳﻨﺪ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﻗﺖ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺳــﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻭﻗﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺟﺎﻩﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻭﻗﺖﻫﺎ
ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﻭﺿﻊ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ،ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻢ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻨﺪ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻫﺸــﺖ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ .ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ
24
ﻟﺬﺍ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺍﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ.ﻳﻚ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ
ﺳﻨﺪ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻲﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺳﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻢ؛ ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻜﻮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﭘﻨﺠﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻜﻤﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺣﺸــﺘﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪ .ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻜﻮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻫﺪﻑ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺑــﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻬﺘﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻨﺪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﺣﺸﺘﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺎ 4/5ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭘﺎﺭﺳﺎﻝ 5/5ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻠﺶ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﻄﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻣﺎﻍ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺱ
6/5ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻳﻢ .ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﻧﮓﺷﻴﺎﺋﻮ ﭘﻨﮓ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴــﻦ ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﺴــﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﻫﺮﻡ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺭﺷﻜﺴــﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻳﻚ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ
ﻫﻤﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺰﻡ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﻲﻫﺎ،
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ
ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ
ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﺎﺋﻮﺋﻴﺴﻢ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ .ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻳﻲ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻫﻢ ﺣﺮﻓــﻲ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﻬــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﺁﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ
ﺷــﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺟﻨﺲ ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴــﻢ ﻫﻤﭽﻨــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳــﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ
ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻜﻮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺪﻫﻴــﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﻫﺪﺍﻳــﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ
ﻋﻬــﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘــﻲ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ )ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ
ﺑﺪﻫﻜﺎﺭﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻃﻠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻫﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ( ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﻟﻴﻌﻬﺪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﺧﺐ ﺍﻳﻦﺟﻮﺭﻱ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺩﺳﺘﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻟﻴﻌﻬﺪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷــﺎﻩ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ
ﺍﻻﻥ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺑﺪﻫﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻲ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ 44ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺪ ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻋﻀﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻃﻠﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺣﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺻﺮﻓﻨﻈﺮ
ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺪﻫــﻲ ﺧــﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨــﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﭙــﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺴــﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﺪﻫﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺟﻠﻮﺗﺮ
ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﮔــﺮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻤﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺟﻠﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ،ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺟﻠﻮﺗﺮﻧﺪ ،ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﺯﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ.
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﻠﻮﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﻛﺮﻩﺍﻱﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺯﺩﻡ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺑﺴـﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻢ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳــﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ .ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺮﻩﺍﻱﻫﺎ ﺧﻴﻠــﻲ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺧــﻮﺩﺭﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﻮﻧﺪﺍ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺠﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺠﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻴﻢ؟
ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ؟
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺰﻡ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ
ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺎﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ .ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﻧﮓﺷﻴﺎﺋﻮ ﭘﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻠﻮﻉ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﺍﺵ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮ ﺷﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﻋﺪﺍﻡ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻋﺎﺩﻩ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﺷﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﺸﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ.
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻭ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﻃﻠﻮﻉ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺯﺷﺮﻕ
ﭘﺮﻭﻓﺴﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﻘﻲﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺭﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱژﺍﭘﻦ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯﺍﻣﭙﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭژﺍﭘﻦ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ژﺍﭘﻦﺭﺍﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩﺟﻠﺐﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﺩﺭﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 100ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﻣﻮﺝ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﭘﺎﻥ )ژﺍﭘﻦ( ﻭ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﻄﻒ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻃﺮﺯ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸــﺎﺑﻪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﻧﺴــﺒﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ،
ﺗﺸــﺎﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﮕﻮﻥ
ﭘﻮﻟﻲ ،ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩﻱ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ.ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻳﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ژﺍﭘﻨﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ژﺍﭘﻨﻲ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻧﻴﺖ ،ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ،ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ژﺍﭘﻨﻲ )ﻛﻴﻜﻮﻛﻮ ﺯﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺗﺴﻜﻴﻦ ﺁﻻﻡ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ( ﻭ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ،ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻋﻘﺐﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳــﺒﻘﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻣﻴﺠﻲ
ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻤﻴﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ،
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋــﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻨﺜــﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑــﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺳــﻴﺮ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻠــﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ
ﻭ ﻧﺸــﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻧﻴــﺰ ،ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ
200ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺗــﻼﺵ ﻣﺴــﺘﻤﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺶ ﮔــﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ -ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺤﺺ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ،ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻲﻣﺜﺒﺖﺑﺎﺗﻤﺪﻥﻭﺻﻨﻌﺖ
ﻏــﺮﺏ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪﭼﻨــﮓ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ -
ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱﻛﻪﺑﺎﻟﻨﺪﮔﻲﻭﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻲﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ-ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱﺑﺎﺁﻥﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭼﺸﻤﮕﻴﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻇﺮﻑ 100ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻓﻜﺮﻱ-ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲژﺍﭘﻦﻛﻪﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱﺑﺨﺸﻲﺍﺯﺁﻥﺍﺳﺖ،
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ -ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ
25
ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ .ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ژﺍﭘﻨﻲ
ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ژﺍﭘﻨﻲ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ،ﻛﻤﺘﺮ
ﺑﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻴﺴﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﻭﺩﻩ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺑﻪﺷــﻜﻞ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱ
ﺗﻔﻜــﺮﺍﺕ ﭼﻴﻨﻲ ،ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻳــﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻬﺪ ﺑﺎﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻳﻜﻄﺮﻓﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺷــﺎﻋﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻏﺮﺑــﻲ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻴﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ژﺍﭘﻦ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺷــﻜﻮﻓﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ
ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺯ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻭ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻮﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ژﺍﭘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ :
ﺩﻳﺴﻴﭙﻠﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺩﻳﺴــﻴﭙﻠﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻤﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ) ﻣﺎﺩﻱ _ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ( ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ
ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻭ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭼﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ
ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸــﻤﻮﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﺴﻴﭙﻠﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺟﻮﻳﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻝ :ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﻳﺎ ﭘﺮﻭﺳﻪ ؟
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﺎﻣﺮﺋﻲ ) ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ( ﻭ ﻣﺮﺋﻲ ) ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺴﺎﺕ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ( ﺑﺴــﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫــﺎﻱ ﻋﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﻳــﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻮﺷﺪ.
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲﺍﻧﺪ
ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ -ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ
ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ،
ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﮕﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺪﺑﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻧﺪﻩ
ﺫﻭﺏ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻠﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﺵ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻦ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻫﻮﻳﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺧﻤﻴﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ
ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺷــﻲ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﺎﻋﻪ
ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲﻓﻜﺮﻱ-ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮﺑﺎﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻲ
26
ﻛﺮﺍﻣﺖﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺩﺭﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏﻧﻈﺎﻡﺑﻨﺪﻱﺣﻴﺎﺕ:ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻠﻲﻳﺎﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻴﻮﻝﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﭼﺸــﻤﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺗﻤﺪﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ -ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺝ
ﻋﺼﺮ ﺗﻮﻛﻮ ﮔﺎﻭﺍ )(1603-1867
ﻏﺮﺏﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ -ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻣﭙﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺯﻳﺮﻱ
250ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍﻱ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ،ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺯﻳﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻇﻦ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺑﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎ ،ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﻧــﻚ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ،ﺭﺍﻩﺁﻫﻦ ،ﺗﺤﺼﻴــﻼﺕ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﻣﻜﺘﺐﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ
ﺗﻴﻮﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ،ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ
ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺁﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ ...ﺑﻬﺮﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻴﻮﻥ
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﻴــﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨــﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺍﺳــﻂ ﻗــﺮﻥ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫــﻢ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺳﺮﻭﺻﺪﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ژﺍﭘﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭ
ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﺯ
ژﺍﭘﻨﻲﻫﺎ ﻳﺎﺩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﻃﻴﺮ ﺷﻴﻨﺘﻮ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻮﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ژﺍﭘﻨﻲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ.
ﻭﺍﺧﻼﻕﻛﻨﻔﺴﻴﻮﺳﻲﺑﺮﺍﻱﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪﻣﺜﺒﺖ
ﻋﺼﺮﺍﻣﭙﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱﺗﺎﻳﺸﻮ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
) (1912- 1926ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ
ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻮ ژﺍﭘﻨﻲﻫﺎ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺻﻨﻌﺘــﻲ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﺗﺸﻨﻪ ﻳﺎﺩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ
ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺳــﺒﻚ ﻭ ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺗﺠﺎﺭ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﻭﻃﻦﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺯﺍﻳﺒﺎﺗﺴﻮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ
ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﺳﻮﻕ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻮﻟﺪ ﺩﺭ
ژﺍﭘﻨﻲﻫﺎ ﻳﺎﺩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﺪﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ
ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮﻳﻦﻃﺒﻘﻪﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ژﺍﭘــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ
ﺗﻜﻠﻴــﻒ ) ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﺖﻛﺸــﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﺖﻛﺸــﻲ ﺁﺧﺮﺕﮔﺮﺍ(
ﻧﻘــﺶ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷــﺪ.
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻮﻟﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺳﺨﺘﻜﻮﺷﻲ ) ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﺶ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ( ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻧﻮﺑﻮ ﻫﻴﺮﻭ ﺳــﺎﺗﻮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻋﺼﺮ ﭘﺮﺗﻼﻃﻢ ﺷﻮﻭﺍ
ﺑﻪﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﮕﺮﻱ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻣﻴﺠﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺳﺎﺗﻮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺜﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻛﺸــﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ،ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﺗﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪﺍﺕ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ
ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻭ ﻭﻃﻦﭘﺮﺳﺘﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﺮﻕ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺳــﺘﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﻡ ﻭ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﻫﻴﺮﺍﺗﺎ ﺁﺗﺴﻮﺗﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻬﻀﺖ ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻳﻲ،
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺳﺎﺗﻮ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃــﺮ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﭽﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻠﻞ،
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻱ ،ﺍﺯ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ 15ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ) (1931 - 1945ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﻢ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺪﺍﻝﻫــﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ژﺍﭘﻦ )ﺟﻨﺎﺡ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺳــﺎﺗﻮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻮﺯﺍ :ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻲ -ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ
ﺳﺮﭘﻨﺎﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻇﻦ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺭﻭﻧﻮ :ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ
ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻮﻟﺪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ژﺍﭘﻦ( ،ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻃﻦﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﻮﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟــﻮژﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻭﻱ ﺗﺎ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﻣﻮﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙﻫﺎﻱ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ
ﺧﻠﻖ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ...
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﻭﻱ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺣﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺨﻔﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻘﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺷﺒﻪﺟﺰﻳﺮﻩ ﻛﺮﻩ ،ﭼﻴﻦ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ژﺍﭘﻨﻲ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻴﺠﻲ )(1868 -1912
ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺘﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺤﻲ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻻﻳــﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺍﺣﻞ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﻠﻴــﺖ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺳﻂ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺪﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸــﺎﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﺳــﺎﺯﻱ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺷﺪ
ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ؛ ﺳـﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻗﻬﻮﻩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪﺍﺯ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻱﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺴﻮﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺫﻫﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥﻭ
ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻜﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﻣﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪﻛﻪﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ»ﭘﻠﻪ«ﻧﻴﺰﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﺯﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱﻻﺗﻴﻦﺑﺎﻓﻘﺮ،ﻓﺴﺎﺩﻭﻓﺤﺸﺎﺩﺳﺖﻭﭘﻨﺠﻪﻧﺮﻡﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.ﺍﻣﺎﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﭼﻴﺰﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳﺖﻛﻪﺩﺭﺟﻤﻊ 10ﻛﺸﻮﺭﺑﺮﺗﺮﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱﺟﻬﺎﻥﺟﺎﻱﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﻭﭼﻨﺪﻱﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖﺩﺍﺋﻢﺩﺭﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻣﻠﻞﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﺳﺖ.ﺍﻳﻦﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﻢ
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥﺩﺭﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻣﻘﺘﺪﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦﻗﺪﺭﺕﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱﻻﺗﻴﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭﺁﻣﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺭﻣﺰ ﻧﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟ ﻭ ﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻣﻴﺮﻗﺎﺳﻢ ﻣﻮﻣﻨﻲ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻻﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺷﻤﺎﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﻻﺗﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺤﺚ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻭ ﻏﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻳﻮﺩﻭژﺍﻧﻴﺮﻭ ،ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ
ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻭ ﺛﺒــﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﺯﻭﺩﺑﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺗﺴــﻬﻴﻞﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ،ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﮔﻤﺮﻛﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺮﺷﺶ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﺵ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﺟــﺬﺏ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣــﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭﺳــﺎﺯﻱ،
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﺳﺎﺯﻱ ،ﻛﺸﺘﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻋﻠﺘﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ
30ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ 30ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺪﻫﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ 100ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺟﺰﻭ 20ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1985ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻭ
ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺷــﻌﺒﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﻤﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺗﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺁﻟﻮﺩﮔﻲ ﻫﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺍﻋــﺎﺕ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻟﻮﺩﮔﻲ ﺯﻳﺴــﺖ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺳﺨﺖﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﮔﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﻠﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﺖ
ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺑﻮﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ،
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻮﻱ ،ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲ ﻛﻠﻜﺴﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺑﻮﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺼﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻠﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ،
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺗﻤﻠﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺗﻤﻠﻚ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻳﻚ
ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺻﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪ ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ
ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻨﻘﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ،ﺁﭘﺎﺭﺗﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ
ﻭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣــﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ
ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻭ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺭﻳﻮﺩﻭژﺍﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥﺧﺮﺍﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﭼﻴﻦ ،ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺯﻳﺮﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻳﺮﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ
ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻄﺮﺣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ
ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ
ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮕﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻛﺎﻏﺬ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻛﺎﻏﺬ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺩﺭﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻛﻠﻜﺴﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭ
ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ :ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ
ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ
27
ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺖ ﺩﻭﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺗﺮﻏﻴﺐ ﻧﺸﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ؟
ﺭﻭﺍﺑــﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳــﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﻗــﺮﻥ ﻫﺠﺪﻫــﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭﻳﻪ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺖ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﻮﺡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﻴﺎﻓﻪ ﻭ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﻮﺥﻃﺒﻊ ،ﻣﻬﻤﺎﻥﻧﻮﺍﺯ
ﻭ ﺧﻮﻧﮕﺮﻡ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻳﻚ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻚﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻳﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﻏﻨﻲ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻣﻨﻌﻘﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻭ
ﻣﺸﺘﻘﺎﺕ ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻳﺎ ﻭ ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ
ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭼﻨﺪﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻠﻜﺴــﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻴﻦ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﻓﺮﻭﺷﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺷـﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺯﻳـﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣـﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺘﻌـﺪﺩﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ،
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱﻻﺗﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﻴﺎﻁ ﺧﻠﻮﺗﺸــﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ،ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻮﻟﻴﻮﻱ
ﻭ ﻭﻧﺰﻭﺋﻼ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ
ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ
28
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻌﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﭼﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺏ ﻣﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻤﺴﻮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻼﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻃﻠﺒﻴــﺪﻩ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ
ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳــﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ
ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴـﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺷﻤﺮﺩ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ! ﭼﻬﻞﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻖ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ
ﺷﺼﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺭﻧﺞ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﻭ ﺗﻚﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺶ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻘﺎﺭﺕ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺷﺼﺖ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻳﻚﺷﺒﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ
ﭼﻬﻞ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﻨﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺗﻚﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﻧﺴــﺨﻪﺍﻱ
ﺑﻨﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪ .ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺭﻭﺯ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﻲ ﻭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻏﺬﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻟﻮﻻ ،ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺷﻜﻮﻓﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺳــﻴﻠﻮﺍ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﮕﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺁﺩﻡ ﻣﻄﺮﺣﻲ
ﻫﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﺎﻳـﺪ ﭘﻴﺸـﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈـﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺴـﺖﻭﺟﻮﻱ
ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺳـﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﺗﺤﻘﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺴــﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻫﻢﻣﺮﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ .ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭﻳﺰﺍ ﻭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺗﻜﻨﺴﻴﻦﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺷـﻤﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺯﻳـﻞ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﻣـﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳـﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻳـﺪ ﻳﻚ
ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺳـﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ
)ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ( ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﺕ ﭼﭗ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺟﻨﺴـﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴـﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳـﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﻻﺗﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﺪﻳﻢﺍﻻﻳﺎﻡ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭﻟــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ
ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺳـﻲ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻴﻢ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ
ﻋﻘﺐ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻴﻢ؟
ﺑﺤﺜﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻢ ،ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺤﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ 8ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺷﻮﺧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﮔﺮﺟﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﮔﺮﺟﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻧﺸــﺪﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺷــﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﺩﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪ :ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺧﺴﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﭘﻮﻟﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭘﻮﻟﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﺩﻭﻡ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﻝﺁﻭﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻭﺩﺑﺎﺯﺩﻩ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻳﻚ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﺶ ﻣﺮﻫﻮﻥ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻭﺩﺑﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﺑﺸــﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺳﻪ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ .ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻭﺩﺑﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺳــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ
ﻫﻢ ﺳﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺍﻣـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺸـﻜﻞﺯﺍ ﺷـﺪ .ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺎﺛﻴــﺮ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺷﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﮕﻲ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻭﺩﺑﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ
ﺟﺪﻱ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻱ ﺗﺴــﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﭘﻮﻝ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﭘﻮﻝ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻭﺩﺑﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻳﻚﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪﺟﺰ ﻫﺸـﺖ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ،
ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴـﻪ ،ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ،ﭼﻴﻦ ،ژﺍﭘﻦ ،ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳـﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ،
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻫﻨﺪ -ﭼﻴﻦ -ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ،ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺩﺑﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺤﺚﺷﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﻮﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﻨﺪ -ﭼﻴﻦ -ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻓﻮﻻﺩ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻛﻨﻢ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻢ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻴﻦ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺩﻫﻠﻲﻧﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﻫﻨﺪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻴﺪﻱﭘﻮﺭ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪﻫﺮ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻨﺪ ﻭﺟﻬﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺭﻭﻥﺯﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺟﻮﺵ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﻧﻮﻳﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﺭﻳﺰﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ.
ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﻥﺯﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ
ﻳﺎ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺟﻬﺶ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﺤﻮﻝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻧﻤﻲﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺁﻥ
ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ
ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﻨﺪﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ
ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺷﺎﻛﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻱ
ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ
ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺁﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﻏﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻓﻼﻃﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻤﺖ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻓﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﺶ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺖ.
ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ
ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺐ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷــﺪ .ﻫﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺑﺴــﺰﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﻫﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑﺯﺍﺩﮔﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻟﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴــﻲﻫﺎ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻱ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻱ
ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺟﻨﺒﺸﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺿﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ
ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺷﻜﻮﻓﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻢﻋﺼﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻜﺮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺿﺪﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺳﻴﻮﻧﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻫﻨﺪﻱ
ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﺳﻴﻮﻧﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﻨﺪﻭ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴــﻲ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻲ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ
ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﮔﺎﻧﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺿﺪﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴــﻲ ﻭ ﺿﺪﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺼﺎﺩﻑ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺳــﺮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺿﺪﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻃﻼﻳﻲ ﺳــﻴﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻤﺖ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻧﺪﻱ ﻣﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﻭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﻧــﻮﺍﺩﻩﺍﺵ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﻫﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻟﺰﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺼﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺭﺍﻳﮕﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﻧﺘﺎژ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺤﺚ ﺫﻭﺏﺁﻫﻦ
ﻭ ﻓﻮﻻﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺷﺪ.ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ.
ﻟﺬﺍ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭼﭗ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻏﺮﺑﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﺸﺘﺎﺩ
ﻫﻨﺪ ﺟﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ،ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻲﻣﻴﻞ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﺸﺘﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﻫﻪ 80ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﻜﻮﻓﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻲﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻲ
ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﻧﻴــﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻳــﻚ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻫﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﭼﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ.
ﻳﻚ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻓﻘﺮﺷﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺷﺎﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺟﺮﻡ
ﻭ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻓﻘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺟﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﻫﻨﺪﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺪﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻼﺕ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳــﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻫﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺗﺴــﻠﻴﺤﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﻨﺪ ،ﭘﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺸــﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﭘﺮﺳــﺘﻴﮋ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ
ﻭ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻛــﻢ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻡ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ.
29
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻧﻮﺫﺭ ﺷﻔﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺭﺷـﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻣﻘـﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺳـﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺎﻡ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ
ﻫﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴـﺘﻘﻞ
ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻨﮕﻼﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺗﻮﺳـﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
»ﻫﻨﺪﻭ« ﺍﺳـﺖ؟ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻧﻮﺫﺭ ﺷﻔﻴﻌﻲ،
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﺒﻪﻗﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﭼﻪ ﻧﺴـﺒﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺷﻐﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨـﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻳـﺎ ﻋﻤﻮﻣـﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ 24ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻳﺎ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺷﺎﻏﻞ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ 39ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﻃﻮﺍﻳﻒ ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺛﻲ ﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻨﺪﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ
37ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ،ﻫﻨﺪﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ 30ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎ 35ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺸــﺎﻏﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺷــﺎﻏﻞ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺷـﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﺴـﺎﺕ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻲﻫـﺎﻱ ﻛﻮﭼـﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺘـﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻧﻴـﺰ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻬﻢ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺷﻐﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺴـﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺸـﺎﻏﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺘـﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
20ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺷــﺪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺷــﻐﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻐﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳﻤﻲ .ﺁﻣﺎﺭ
ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ 8ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ ﺑﺎ 21ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ
ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻃﻮﺍﻳﻒ ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺛﻲ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﻫﺎ
30
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ 18ﻭ 22ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻳـﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳـﺖ ﻣﺴـﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ
ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳـﻤﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨـﺪ .ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﺗـﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ
ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﻭ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺤﻞ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 12ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻣﺤﻞ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﻠﻲ )ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
8ﺩﺭﺻﺪ( ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 70ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻝﺷﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻟﻲ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻟﻲ ﻳﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻟﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺷــﻐﻞ
ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ 13ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺷﻐﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 25ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﻫﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺷﻐﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺸﺎﻏﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ،ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺎﻏﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﺸﺎﻏﻞ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 25ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺸــﺎﻏﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸــﺎﻏﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻮﺍﻳﻒ ﻫﻨﺪﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
40ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ،ﻫﻨﺪﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﺒــﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ 38ﺩﺭﺻﺪ،
ﻫﻨﺪﻭﻫــﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺣــﺪﻭﺩ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 45ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺷــﻐﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ 25ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻛﻤﺘــﺮ ﺍﺯ 40ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ 58ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ 52 .ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
74ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻧﺮﺥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺪﻱ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻧﺮﺥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ 11ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﻫﺎﺳــﺖ
ﻫﺮﭼﻨــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺪﻭ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺛﻲ ﻫﻨﺪﻭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺩﻩ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻫﻨﺪﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺷﻐﻠﻲ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟
ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺷﻐﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 73ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪﺑﺎﺩﻳﮕﺮﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲﻫﻨﺪﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦﻣﻴــﺰﺍﻥﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻣﺜﺎﻝﺑــﺮﺍﻱﻫﻨﺪﻭﻫــﺎﻱﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺑﺎﻻ 52ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻴــﻦﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲﻫﻨﺪﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩﺍﺧﺘﺼــﺎﺹﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.ﺣﺪﻭﺩ23
ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ 42ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻻ،
32ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﻫــﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ 35،ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻃﻮﺍﻳﻒﻭﻛﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱﻣﻮﺭﻭﺛﻲﻫﻨﺪﻭ 38ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱﻫﻨﺪﻱ.
ﻓﻘﺮ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳـﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ،ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻓﻘﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺁﻣــﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 2005ـ 27 ،2004ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ
ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺧﻂ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻃﻮﺍﻳﻒ ﻗﺒﺎﻳﻞ ﻫﻨﺪﻭ ﺑﺎ 35
ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺧﻂ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ
ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ 31ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺯﻳﺮﺧﻂ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻓﻘــﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺍﻥ ﻋﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ
8/7ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺪﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺯﻳﺮﺧﻂ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﺸــﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ 25ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﻮﺍﻳﻒ ﻫﻨﺪﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 40ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺧﻂ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻫﺮﻣﻴﺪﺍﺱ ﺑﺎﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻴﻨﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺎ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎ
ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻳﺎ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﺩﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﮔﺸـﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺸـﻴﻦ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﻨﺠﺎﻣﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴـﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺴـﺨﻴﺮ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺷـﺪ .ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﻭ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩ ﻫﺮﻣﻴﺪﺍﺱ ﺑﺎﻭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﺍﻛﺎﻭﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﻧﮓ ﺷﻴﺎﺋﻮ ﭘﻴﻨﮓ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺳـﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ
ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ
ﺑـﻪ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺷـﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑـﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴـﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؟
ﭼﻴﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﻨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ
ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﭼﺘﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ
ﺩﻓﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺮ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻐﻮﻟﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺟﺰﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻧﺸــﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺸﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻜﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺷﺪ.
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﻠﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻣﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﺒﻮﺝ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ.
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ؛ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺿﺮﺑﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺩﻧﮓ
ﺷــﻴﺎﺋﻮ ﭘﻴﻨﮓ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻮﻳﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻛﺴﻴﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻜﻦ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪﺳﻤﺖ ﻋﺎﺩﻱﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﮔﺎﻡ ﭘﻨﺠﺮﻩﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﮔﺸــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ 12ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻــﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﺸﻤﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻳﻜﻲ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ .ژﺍﭘﻦ
ﺩﺭ 40ﺍﻳﺎﻟﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﻗﺮﺿــﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﻝ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ژﺍﭘﻦ ،ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﻗﺮﺿﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﻝ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ.
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻫﺠﻮﻡ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﻴﺴــﺖ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﺸــﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺁﻳﺪ .ﭼﻴﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻜﻲ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺎﻡﺑﻪﮔﺎﻡ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ
ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ.
ﺩﻧﮓﺷﻴﺎﺋﻮﭘﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺖ
ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؟
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎﺋﻮ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﻮﺕ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺗﻠﺨﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻧﮓ ﺷﻴﺎﺋﻮﭘﻴﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﺗﻠﺨﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻓﺖ.
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﻟﻨﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ
ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳـﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓـﺎﺕ ﻗﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻗﺐ
ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸـﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧـﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﻪ
ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﭘﺎﺷﻨﻪ ﺁﺷــﻴﻞ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻦﻛﻴﺎﻧﮓ ﻭ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﻳﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻴﻦ
ﻋﻤﻼ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴــﺖ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﻮﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺷــﺼﺖ ﭼﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎ ﺳﻌﻲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﻋﻤــﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ
ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺒﺖ
ﻭ ﺳــﻴﻦﻛﻴﺎﻧﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸــﺮ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺗﻲ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﭘﺎﺷــﻨﻪ ﺁﺷــﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻨﺪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﮔﻮﻱ ﺳﺒﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺑﺎﻳﺪ؟
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ،ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﺵ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻮﻓﻖﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻭ ﻧﺴﺦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ.
ﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﻨــﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﺮ
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻤﺒﺌﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ.
ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺣﺴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
31
ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺧﺎﻧﻲ
ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﻢﺩﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺁﺳــﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﺩﺍﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ،ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﻢﺩﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ.
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺑﻪﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺣــﻞ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ،
ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻲ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻲ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺁﻣــﺎﺭﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺛﺮﺑﺨﺶ ،ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧــﻲ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻣﺎﺑﻴﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﺳــﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺁﺳــﻴﺐﻫﺎ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺍﻗﺺ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺻــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺪﻭﻳــﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻃﻲ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸــﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ
ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ
ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ )ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ(
ﺍﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻠﻔﻴــﻖ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
32
ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ،ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻭ ﻣﻤﻴﺰﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﺸﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ،ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ
ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺳــﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ.ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳــﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺼﺖﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﺎ
ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ 5ﻳﺎ 10ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﻭﺍﺭ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﺳــﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺤﻞ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻪﺳﻤﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﻳﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﺩﺍﻳﻢ )ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ( ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻛﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ .ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻠﻘﻴﺎﺕ
ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩﻣﺪﺕ
ﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﺎﻥﻣــﺪﺕ ،ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ
ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺠﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺼﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺣﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻠﻘﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ
ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ،ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋــﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ
ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺿﻤﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺟﻬﺖﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﺳﻮﻡ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻧﻲ
)ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ( ﻭ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ )ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ( ،ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻳﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ
ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺗﺤﺖﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﻉ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﻃﺮﺡ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ،ﻃــﺮﺡ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﺪﻡ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺕ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺎﻟﺲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴــﺠﺎﻡ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﭙﻮﺷﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻭ
ﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻼءﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺷﻚ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺤﺜﻲ
ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻃﻠﺒﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺷــﻲ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺤﺮﻙ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ
ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺘﻲ
ﺑﻪﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ،
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ.
www.mosalas.ir
SwIÃw
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﻲ ﺯﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺻﻔﺖ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ،ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺣﺎﻣﻲﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
33
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﻢ ،ﺣﻖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ .ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻣﺴــﺘﺜﻨﻰ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﭼﻪ ﻋﻴﺐ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺣﺮﻓﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﻣﮕــﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺸــﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﻫﺪﻓﻰ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻫﻢ ،ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺸﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ )ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ( ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻨﺶ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﺱ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻤﺴﻮﺗﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﻣﻮﻓﻖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺗﺮﺱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ،ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ -ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ -ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺘﻰ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻰﺣﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻣﺴﺘﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﺵ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﺎﺏ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺟﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﻳﻜﺪﺳــﺖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺪ .ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺣﺠﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ
ﻧﻤﻰﻧﻤﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻮﺩﺑﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻟﻪﺩﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ؛ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﺠﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻣﺘﺒﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ،ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﺍﻯ 4 ،3ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒــﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﭼﺸــﻤﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ
ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﻟﺤﻦ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻯ
ﺭﺍﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺮﺳــﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻗﻴﺒﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻯ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰﺍﺵ ﺍﺗﻜﺎ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﺵ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺑﺖ
ﻧﺴــﺒﻰ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ ﻧﺎﻳﺐﺭﺋﻴﺴــﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻨﺸــﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻓﺎﻗﺖ ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰﻭﺭﻭﺩﺭﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻰﻫﺎﻯﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰﺑﺎﺍﻭﻭﺗﺸﻜﻞﻣﺠﻤﻊﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻭﺟﻮﺩﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ،
ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ-ﻛﻪﺩﺭﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰﺍﺵﻫﻴﭻﻧﻘﻄﻪﺟﺬﺍﺑﻰﻭﺟﻮﺩﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ–ﺗﺎﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ .ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﺪﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ .ﻧﺨﺴﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﺰﺍﻉ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﺮﺩﺳﺘﻰ ،ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺞ ﺭﻳﻨﮓ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺸﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺶ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻧﻬﻢ،ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥﺭﺍﺣﻮﻝﻣﺤﻮﺭﺍﻭﮔﺮﺩﺁﻭﺭﺩ.ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺩﻟﻴﻞﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﻣﺠﻠﺲﻫﺸﺘﻢ،
ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 85ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ )ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻼ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺍﻳﺤﻪ ﺧﻮﺵﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ( ﺣﺘﻰ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻧﮕﺸــﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﺭﺳﺪ .ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺘﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﺍﻯ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺁﻗﺎﺗﻬﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﷲ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳﻢ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ – ﻭ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺷــﺨﺺ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ -ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ
ﺗﻜﻠﻴــﻒ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺧﻴﺰﻧﺪ .ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺭﺩ ﺗﻴﺘﺮ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺳﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺭﺩ.
ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝﻋﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻜﺸﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ،
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻳﺐﺭﺋﻴﺴﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻘﺶ ،ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﺰﺭگﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻄﻖ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ – ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ – ﺑﻪﺑﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻪﭼﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﻻ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﻫﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﻣﻬﻢ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﮔﺮ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻧــﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺮﻏﻴﺐ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﮔﺮﻳﺰﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻰﻋﻼﻗﮕﻰ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺷﻮﺭﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻫﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﺷﺪ ،ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺸﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
34
ﺍﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺑﻪﺷﻜﻞ
ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺯﻩ ﻫﺮﻣﻲ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻫﻴﺮﺍﺩﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻮﻝﭘﻴﻜﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﻮﻻﻱ ﻏﻮﻟﻨﺎﻛــﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﻗــﻮﻩ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﺁﺩﻣﻲ
ﻓﻀﺎﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺳــﺎﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑــﺎ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﺎﻛﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻓﺎﻫــﻲ ﻣﻤﺘﺎﺯ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ؛
ﺳﺎﺯﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﻃﻮﻝ ،ﻋﺮﺽ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺘﻘﺎﺭﻥ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﻭ ﺩﻟﻨﺸﻴﻦ
ﻛــﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﻛﺎﻏﺬ ﺗﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻫﻤﭽﻨــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺑﻲﺑﻬﺮﻩ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ .ﮔﻨﺠﻴﻨﻪ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﺎﻥ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻤﻠﻮ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﻨﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺻﻔﺤﻪﻛﺎﻏﺬ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳــﺎﻛﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻴﺮﺕ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺣﺴﺮﺕ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻨﺸــﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻛﻤﻲ ﺁﻧﻄﺮﻑﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦﺩﺍﺭ
ﺑﻬﺎﺭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻭﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ
ﻫﻤﻨﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺴﻴﻦﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺍﻫﺮﺍﻡ ﺛﻼﺛﻪ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺪﺍﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﺑﻨﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺜﻠﺜﻲﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻄﺢ
ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﻌﺎﺕ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ» :ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ« .ﺳﺎﺯﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻨﺲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻔﺖ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺤﺚﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺎﻧﻮﺋﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ،ﻓﻴﻠﺴــﻮﻑ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺲ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ» :ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ «.ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘﺶ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺎﺷﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺧــﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻀﺎ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺸــﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻋﻼﻗﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﻱ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳــﻢ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻓﻦ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻭ ﺭﺳﻢ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﺧﺸﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺍﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﻳﻚﺳﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺎﺯ ﻧﺎﻛﻮﻙ ﻧﺎﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﺯﺧﻤﻪ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺳــﻴﻊﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐﺗﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ،
ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺕ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻣﺎﺳــﻨﺞ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻨﺠﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺘﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﭘﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺳﻢ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺒﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻘﺶ
ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺒﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ
ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ،ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؛ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺮ ﮔﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛــﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﭙﺎﺭﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﺖ.
35
ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﺎﺟﺮﺍﺕ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺸــﺘﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻮﺍﻫﻲ
ﺑﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻴﺼﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﭼﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﺘﺮ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺸــﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ
ﻣﺠﻠﺴــﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻢﺗﻨﺶ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺗﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﻔﺖ ﻣﺒﻬﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ
ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺱﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ ﻭ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﻨﺪﺍﺯﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻪﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ »ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ«
ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺮﭼﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ 50ﻛﺮﺳــﻲ ﺍﺯ
270ﻛﺮﺳﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﭼﭗ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺍﺟﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
150ﻛﺮﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻛﻮﭘﻦ ،ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺷﻮﻳﺪ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﻭ ﻭﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺻﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻕ ﻛﻮﭘﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ
ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺳــﺘﺼﻮﺍﺑﻲ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫــﺎﻱ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﺑﻲﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷــﺖ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
36
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺑﻪﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 74ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻩﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﻧﻮﺭﺑﺨﺶ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻋﺎﺩﻟﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺗﺮﺱ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ
ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﻧﺪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻫﺮﺍﺱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻠﻪﺍﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸــﻴﺐﻫﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺍﻩ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ.
ﻋﻠﺖ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﻬﻨﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﺏ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ
ﭼﻨﺪﺳــﺎﻝ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﻯ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻭﺯﻧﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎ ﻏﺎﻳﺐ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﻭ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻭ
ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﮕﻰ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯ ﻛﻪ
ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﺑﻪﻛﻨﺎﻳــﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﺪﻫﻴﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ
ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪ.
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ .ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ
ﺷﺪ .ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻳﺪ،
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺸــﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﻧﺎﻗﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺘﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﭼﭗ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﺑﻪﺳــﺮ
ﻣﻰﺑﺮﺩ .ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺷــﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺷــﻜﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﭼﭗ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ.
ﻏﻔﻠﺖ
ﻧﻜﺘــﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﻮﺟــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭘﻨﺠــﻢ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﻻﻯ
ﻓﺎﺋﺰﻩﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ – ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ – ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؛ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻓﺎﺋﺰﻩ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳــﺮﻯ ﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﻳﻰ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﻳﻌﻨــﻰ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻏﺎﻓﻞ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻜﺴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﺭﺍﺳﺖﺑﻪﻣﺮﻭﺭﻭﺑﺎﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺷﺪﻥﺑﻪﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﻫﻔﺘﻢﺧﻮﺩﺭﺍﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ.ﺻﻒﺁﺭﺍﻳﻰﻫﺎﺩﺭﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﻫﻔﺘﻢﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖﺍﺯﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﺭﺍﺳﺖﺳﻨﺘﻰﺍﺯﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯﺍﺵ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻧﺎﻃﻖﻧﻮﺭﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﺴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺳﻬﻤﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪﺁﻧﻬﺎﺗﻌﻠﻖﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ
ﺭﻳﺨﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺟﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﻮﻫﺒﺘﻰﺩﻳﮕﺮﺑﺮﺍﻯﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﺭﺍﺳﺖﺑﻪﺍﺭﻣﻐﺎﻥﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺑﻮﺩ.ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣــﺰﺏ ﺁﻭﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻬﺖﮔﻴﺮﻯﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﺭﺍﺳﺖﺭﺍﻧﺸﺎﻥﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺮﺕ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺳﻨﮕﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺧﺎﺗﻤــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﺩ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﺭﻳﺨﺖ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﭼﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
20ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺑﻪﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻰ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻰﻃﻠﺒﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﺮﺕ ﻓﺮﻭﺭﻓﺖ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘــﺐ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓــﻞ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺷــﺪﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺗﻨﻰ ﻭ
ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺗــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨــﺖ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺍﻡﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﻳﻚ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ
ﻭ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺗﺠﻤﻌﺎﺕ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺩﻫﻤﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻓﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺎﻩﻃﻠﺒﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ
ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻝ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ
ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺑﻪﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ.
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺗﺸﺒﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﺍﻓﺘــﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭼﻴﺮﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﺒﻬﻢ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪ ،ﭘﺎﻙ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﻪﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻋﻠﻲﺍﻛﺒﺮ
ﻧﺎﻃﻖﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻫﻢﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ
ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕــﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺸﻢ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺮﺳﻲ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﻨﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺸﻢ ﺭﺍ
ﻗﺒﻀﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺳﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﻧﺸﻴﻨﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍﻱ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎ ﻧﻨﺸﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑــﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺑﻌﺪﻧﻴﺰﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲﺷﻜﺴﺖﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ
ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﺷﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﺷــﻨﺎﺱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳــﻴﺪﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺗﺎﺝﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﻭ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻣﻴــﻮﻩ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﭘﻴﺎﭘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﺮﺻــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﮔــﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻫﺎﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺕ
ﻧﺴــﺒﻲ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻳــﻚ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻬــﺮﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﮔــﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺗﻤــﺎﻡ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗــﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑــﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ
ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗــﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺋﺘــﻼﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ
ﺧﺪﻣﺖﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻲﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻈﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺑﺎ ﺯﺩﻭﺩﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤــﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘــﺪﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﻭﺍﻣﺪﺍﺭ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒــﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﺣﻮﻝ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺻﻒﺁﺭﺍﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ
ﻋﻤﻼ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤــﺎﺩ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺗﺸــﺪﻳﺪ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻲﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﺮﻭﺯ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺩﻳــﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺣــﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑــﻞ ﺍﻭ ﺻﻒ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺶ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻃﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﻴــﺮﺩ .ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺗﺸــﺪﻳﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻃــﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻳﻜﺪﺳﺖﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺭﻗﺒﺎ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺗﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻃﺮﻓــﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛــﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺗﻨﺶﺁﻣﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻲ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺷﺪ.
ﻋﺒﺮﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳــﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓــﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺗــﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻫــﻢ ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ.
ﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺷــﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ
ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﭘﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺣﺪﻳﺚﻫﺎ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻲﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ
ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﻳﻖ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺩﺭﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
37
ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﺎﺭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺁﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ
ﻣﺠﺎﻟﺲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻘﺎﺏﻫﺎ ،ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ،ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ،ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﺸﻤﻜﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ
ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻋﻴﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺪﻟﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺳـﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺣﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺪ.ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺸﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ،ﻗﻮﻩﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﻳﺎ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺤﻔﻠﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻳﻜﺪﺳﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﮔﺬﺷـﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺴﺒﻮﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﺨﺴـﺘﻴﻦ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻰ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺣﺴـﻦ ﺳـﺒﺤﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ ،ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ،ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻰ ،ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ...ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻧﻬﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳـﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗـﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻝ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳـﺘﺎﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛـﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﮔﺮﺍ ﻛﺎﺭﺳﺎﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻰﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻜﻨﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺷﺪ.
ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻧﺎﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 13ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻤﻜﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ
ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺮﺩ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺷﺖ
ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺎﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؛ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﭘﺎﺩﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺼﺮﺍﻑ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺒﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺷﺪ .ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺟﻨﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺷﻴﻄﻨﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮ
ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺘﻨﻪﮔﺮﻱﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻓﺪﺍﻳﻲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ» :ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ
ﺟﺰ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﺮﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﻋﺎﻣﻼﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ «.ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻳﻚﻣﺎﻩ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻓﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ:
»ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻀﺮﺍﺕ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺪﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﻖ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ »ﺩﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻰ« ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺸﺎﻯ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ
ﺍﺳﺎﻣﻰ ﺭﺍﻧﺖﺧﻮﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﻼﻫﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺧﺪﻣﺘﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺩﻳﺮ ﻃﺮﺡ
ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺑﺰﺭگ ،ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺪﻡﺗﺼﻮﻳﺒﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﺪﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ«.
ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻴﺮﺭﺱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸــﺘﻤﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺣﺬﻑ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻯﻫﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﺪﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﺮﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻗﺎﺋﻢﻣﻘﺎﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﭘﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ
ﻃﺎﻟﻘﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ
ﭘﻮﺭﻣﺤﻤﺪﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻰ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻯ ،ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺯﺍﻛﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﮋﻥ ﻧﻮﺑﺎﻭﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻼﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻛﺴــﻔﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻘﻠﺒﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻴﻀﺎﺡ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ 247ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ 188ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻀﺎﺡ ﻭﻯ ﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻧﺸــﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ
ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺻﺮﻳﺤﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ
ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻫﻨﮕﻔﺘﺶ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻧﺎﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﺯﻥ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺣﻴﻢﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺗﻘﻰ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﭘﺮﻭﭘﺎﻗﺮﺹ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻰﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺰﻝ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ ﺭﺣﻴﻢﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪﻛﻪ ﻧﺼﺎﻳﺢ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻐﺘﻨﻢ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ «.ﻭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ ﻭ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ ،ﺩﻭ ﺗﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻯ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﺯﻥ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﺪﻫﻨﺪ«.
38
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ
ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 23ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺝ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺯﻭﺝ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻣﻰﺷﻤﺮﺩ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺻﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 23ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ
ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻢ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺳﺎﻝ 53ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ
ﻣﻠﻐﻰ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ 53ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ «.ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ» :ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 23ﻛﻪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺝ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﺧﺸﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ
ﮔﻢ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﺩﻻﺭ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸــﻤﻜﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺷــﺪ .ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﺸﺪﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﮔﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻧﻔﺖ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻭ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﻔﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻭ ﺧﺰﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 85ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﻮﺭ ﺩﺭﻧﻤﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺰﺍﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﻳﺰ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﻭﻯ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪﺩﻗﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﮔﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﻰﻭﻗﻔﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻄﻖﻫﺎﻯ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺴــﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻳﻜﻪﺗﺎﺯﻯﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓــﺮﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﻟﻰ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻋﺒــﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﻓﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺒﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺑﺎﻫﻨــﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﺭﺩ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﺑﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻔﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻣــﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺍﺳــﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻯ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﺯﺍﺭﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻛﺮﻣﻰﺭﺍﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻫﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻣﺒﻨﻰﺑﺮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳــﺰﺵ ﺁﺭﺍﻯ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴــﺮﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻯ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ
ﻋﺪﻡ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﷲ ﺣﺴــﻴﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﻭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻜﺸــﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺷﻠﻴﻚﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﭘﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ.
ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﻫﺮﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤــﺎﺩ ﺑــﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﭼﻴﻨــﺶ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠــﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﻪﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﻣﺸــﺎﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﻮﺩ ﺟﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺧﺸﻢ ﻭ ﻏﻀﺐ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧــﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﮔﺰﻳﻨﺶ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﺯﻥ ﮔﻼﻳﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ،ﻧﺎﻳﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻃﻘﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴﺰﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻱﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴــﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﻄﻖ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺧﻂﻣﺸــﻲ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺷــﻔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻄﻖ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﺕ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﻱ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺩﻭﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺧﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺷــﻜﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻳﺎ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ «.ﻭﻱ ﺳــﭙﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻢ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺣﻖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺣﻖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ
290ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ
ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ «.ﻭﻱ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻚﺗﻚ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺳﻮﮔﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ «.ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺳــﻠﺐ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻀﺎﺡ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ
ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺰﻝ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﺎﻳﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺷﺪ» :ﺗﻌﻬﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺮﻁ ﺿﻤﻦ ﻋﻘﺪ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﮔﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ،ﺟﺪﺍﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻉ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺩﻏﺎﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ:
»ﻛﺸــﻤﻜﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﺳــﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ «.ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ
ﻧﺎﻣﺘﺠﺎﻧﺲ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺿﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺷــﻤﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻬﺞ ﺑﻲﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ
ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﻫﻢ ،ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎﺕ
ﻭ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﭼﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ «.ﻭﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﻛﺎﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺍﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ
ﭘﻴﺎﻣﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﺳﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ «.ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻧﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﻥ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﭼﻪ ﺍﺷــﻜﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻲﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺯﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺗﺎ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ،ﺑﺎﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺗﺎ ﻻﺍﻗﻞ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪ «.ﻭﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻄﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺟﻠﺴــﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺑــﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻳﺎ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﺷﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﻖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ؟«
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﻩﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ،
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ» :ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ «.ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺩﻫﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ،ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻴﻀﺎﺡ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻄﻜﺎﻙ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ «.ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ «.ﻭﻯ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ ﺭﺣﻴﻢﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺣﺠﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻣﻤﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﻣﻄﻬــﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻟﻨﻜﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ
ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻻﻳﺖﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﺷــﻤﺎ )ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ( ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﻟﻲﻓﻘﻴﻪ
ﺟﺎﻣﻊﺍﻟﺸﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﻳﺪ«.
39
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﺭﺷﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﺤﻤـﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﺑﻴﻐـﺶ ،ﻋﻀﻮ
ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﻛـﺰﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳـﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍ ﺳـﻼ ﻣﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴـﻦ ﻋﻀـﻮ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻘـﻼﺏ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﻣﻌﺘﻘـﺪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺑﻴـﻦ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣـﻲ ﻭ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻋﻤﻘﻲ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓـﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳـﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺮﺳﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻓﺮﺩ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻤﻊ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺿﺮﺭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺗﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺛﻤﺮ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻔﺖ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷﺪﻧﺶ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭ ﺿﺮﺭﻱ ﻧﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﺿﺮﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ
ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻜﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﻳــﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺁﻳﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣـﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑـﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳـﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﻫـﻢ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻧﺤﻮ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻴــﻒ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ
ﻳﻚ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﺢ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻳﻌﻨـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣـﺎﻥ ﻧﻘـﺪﻱ ﺑـﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻜـﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑ
ﻣﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺨﺺ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺷﻚ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻋــﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﻟﻲ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺟﻠﻮﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
40
ﻣﺠﻠﺲﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻫﻔﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﺭﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻣﺠﺎﻟﺲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﻋﻴﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺯﻳﺴﺘﻰ
ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻫﻢﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧــﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻴﺮﻩ ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ .ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ،ﺣﺴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻰ،
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﺑﻮﻃﺎﻟﺐ ،ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍﻥ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻰ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺭﺿــﺎ ﺧﺎﺩﻡ ،ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿــﺎ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺘــﻰ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ
ﺷﺎﺧﺺﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﻯ ﺳﺒﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺭ
ﻃﺮﺡ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ .ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﺝ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﻰ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ .ﺩﻭﺩﺳﺘﮕﻰ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺪﺍ
ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳــﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺭﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻋﻤﺎﺩﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻧﺸﻌﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻰﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻧﺎﻳﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻓﺖ.
ﺳــﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﺑﻮﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻓﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻌﻴﺸــﺘﻰ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺳــﺮﻭﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰﺗﺮ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ:
»ﺑﺎ ﺑﻰﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ
ﻫﻴــﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ،
ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺯﻳﺮﺳــﺎﺧﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ«.
ﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻛــﻢﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ» :ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ «.ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺮﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ؛ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ؟«
ﻋﻤــﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﻜﺪﺳــﺖ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺑﺴﺘﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺷﻜﻨﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻭ
ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻜﺠﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻲ ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ:
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ ،ﻋﻀﻮ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻧﺎﻳﺐﺭﺋﻴـﺲ
ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖﻣﻠﻲﻭﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟـﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴـﺲ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥﺑﺮﺳـﺮﺍﺻﻮﻝﻧﻴﺴﺖﺑﻠﻜﻪﺁﻧﻬﺎﺩﺭﺍﺟﺮﺍﻭﻋﻤﻞ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﻃﺮﻓـﺪﺍﺭﺩﻭﻟـﺖﻭﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺩﻭﻟـﺖﺭﻭﻱﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﺳـﺖﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲﻭ ﺷـﻜﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺩﺭﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺗﺎﺣﺪﻱﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﺩﻳﺪﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺁﻥ
ﺩﺭﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﻛﺮﺩﻥﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪﻛﻪﭼﻨﻴﻦﺑﺎﺷﺪﻛﻪﺷﻴﺐﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱﻻﻳﺤﻪﺑﻴﺶﺍﺯﭘﻨﺞ
ﺳﺎﻝﺑﺎﺷﺪﻳﺎﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱﺣﺎﺻﻞﺍﺯﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱﻻﻳﺤﻪﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺧﺰﺍﻧﻪﺷﻮﺩﺑﻌﺪﺍﺯﺁﻥﺩﻭﻟﺖﺑﺮﺍﻱﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﺍﺯﺁﻥﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﺠﻮﺯﺍﺯﻣﺠﻠﺲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻛﺎﺫﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎﺕ ،ﺗﻮﻫﻢﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ،ﺧﻮﺩﺳﺎﻧﺴــﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺣﺲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﻧﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﻮﺡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧــﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ ،ﺣﺴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻞ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰﺍﺵ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖﮔﺴــﺘﺮﻯ،
ﻣﻬﺮﻭﺭﺯﻯ ،ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﺸﺘﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ ﺳﻔﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ،ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﺶ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﮕﻰ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﻳﺎﺩﺷــﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻴﺖﺯﺩﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬــﺮﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻭ
ﻗﺸﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻭ ﻣﮋﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻢ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﻀــﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺧــﻂ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺣﺼﻞ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻌﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ 40ﻣﺎﻩ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﮔﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺧﻼﻑ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ 20ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺣﺴــﻦ ﺳــﺒﺤﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ
ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮ 10ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻎ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ 84
ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ .ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ
ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻭﻋﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺸــﺎﺭ
ﻛﻢﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺭﻓﺘﻦ
ﻧﺮﺥ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪ«.
ﺍﻟﻴــﺎﺱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﺘﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﺘﺎﺏﺯﺩﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﭘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘــﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻰ،ﻧﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺠــﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﺑﺴــﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴــﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻌﻴﺸــﺘﻰ ﺩﻫﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻢﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ،
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸــﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻥ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ
ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ .ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﺑﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺭﻭﻛﺮﺍﺳــﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪﺍﻓــﻮﻝ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺷــﺖ» :ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﺯﺍﻳﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﻛﻨﺪ«.
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻰ
ﭼــﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺭﺿﺎ ﺧﺎﺩﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ
ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻧﻘﺪﻯ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﮔﺪﺍﭘﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺷﻴﻮﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘــﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻰﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕﻫﺎ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣـﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺑﻴـﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺣﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﺍﺣﺖ
ﻧﻈﺮﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﻧﺪﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ
ﻭ ﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡﻭﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤﻲ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ
ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻭ
ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺼﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ،
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ
ﺷــﺨﺺ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﻛــﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﺮ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﻳﻜﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﻢ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
41
ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻲﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ:
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺗﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ
ﺭﺋﻴﺴـﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷـﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻲﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺸﺎﺑﻮﺭ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴـﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴـﺖ ﺑﺎ 103ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ
ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴـﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳـﻄﻪ ﺻﻔﺖ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍﻩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷـﻜﻞ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺧـﻲ ﺑﻪﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﻘـﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻟﺸﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﺘﻦ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻲﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ.
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﺎﺕ،
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃــﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻲﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺸﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﺎ 220ﻋﻀﻮ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋــﻪ ﺑﺎ 30ﻳــﺎ 40ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻛﻼﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﻛﻠﻲ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻧﻲ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ،ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻱ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ،ﻣﻮﺗﻠﻔﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻫﭙﻮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ
ﻛﻼﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ،
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺬﻣﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﻔﻆ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ،
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻼﻳﻖ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲﺗـﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓـﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫـﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠـﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻟﺸــﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
42
ﺩﻫﻢ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺩﻫﺪ،
ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴــﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﻃﻲ ﺩﻭ
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺭﺍﻱﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺛﺒﺖﻧﺎﻡ
ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻭﺩ؟
ﭼﻨﻴﻦﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲﺩﺭﺳﻄﺤﻲﻧﻴﺴﺖﻛﻪﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥﮔﻔﺖﭼﻨﺪﺻﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺷﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻦ ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ
ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﭼﺘﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻱ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺴــﻮﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓـﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﭼـﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﺑـﺮ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ،ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﺯﺍﺭﻋﻲ ،ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﺭﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻪ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺷــﺪﻥ »ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﻫﺎ« ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﻳﺪ .ﺑــﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺑﺴﺘﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺑﺴﺘﻦ
ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 13ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
»ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻱ« ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑﺮﺳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣـﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿـﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﻴـﻒ ﺍﺻﻠـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧـﺎﺕ ﻭ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻃﻴﻒ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ؟
ﺧﻮﺷــﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﻘﻨﻨﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﭘﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻄﻴﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﮕﺸﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ،
ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﻘﻨﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
200ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ
ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ
ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷـﺒﻬﻪ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﻫﺎ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫــﺎ ﺍﺯ »ﻣﻨﻄﻖ« ﻭ »ﺍﺳــﺘﺪﻻﻝ« ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ.
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺻــﺮﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺴــﻲ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺧــﻞ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ
ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﺎﺯ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ »ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ« ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘــﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄﺮ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻧﻘﻮﻱ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸـﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺩﻭ ﻧﺮﺳـﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻣـﺎ ﻃﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣـﺪﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴـﺖ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤـﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗـﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﭘﻴﻮﺳـﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧـﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻳـﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻛﺎﻣـﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ .ﻃﺮﺡ
ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨـﺪ ﻛـﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫـﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥﻫـﺎﻱ ﻣﻜـﺮﺭ ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺸـﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨـﺎﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﺟـﻪ ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺗﺮﻳـﻦ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫـﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﻭ
ﻧﻴـﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻠـﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ.
ﻫﻤﻴـﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺳـﺒﺐ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺗـﺎ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻫﻤﻔﻜـﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕـﺮﺍ ﻧﻴـﺰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺗـﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﭘﻴـﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ؛
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺴـﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﮔﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴـﻴﻦ ﻧﻘﻮﻱ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴـﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳـﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ،
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴـﻦ ﻋﻀـﻮ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻘـﻼﺏ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺼﺎﻓﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴـﺮﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳـﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻭ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺗﺸـﺎﻥ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺳـﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﺑـﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠـﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴـﺠﺎﻡ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺣﺲ ﻭ ﻣﺸـﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴـﻴﻦ ﻧﻘﻮﻱ
ﺣﺴـﻴﻨﻲ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓـﺎﺕ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻃﻴﻒ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳــﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻟــﻎ ﺑﺮ 220ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻣﻨﺴــﺠﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫــﺎﻱ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﻘﻨﻨﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 220ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻙ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﻘﻨﻨﻪ
ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭ ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺒﺴــﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ
ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻣــﻮﺭ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺟﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷــﻮﺩ
ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﺧﺘﻴــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻳﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺧﺘﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻣﺜﻼ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺯﻳﺮ
25ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﻭ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳــﺐ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈــﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺣﺪﺕﻧﻈﺮ ﻭ ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﮕﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﺷﻨﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳـﻲ ﺷـﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺑﻪﻭﺟـﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺟﻮ
ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺧﻴــﺮ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼــﻮﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪﺑﻠﻮﻍ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺯﺍﻳﺶ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﻪﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺳــﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻛﻼﻥ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﻣﻬﻢ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮﻫـﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳـﻲ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈــﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﺑﻪﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺑﺮﺳــﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺳﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺺ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﺣــﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺍﻳﺴــﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺗﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓـﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ
ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﮔـﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺎﺳـﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗــﺎ ﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻭ
ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﮕﻲ ﺧﻮﺑــﻲ ﺑﻴــﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺑــﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﻨــﻲ ﻣﻲ ﺷــﺪ ﻣﺜــﻼ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈــﺮﺍﺕ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻱ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﺎﻃﻊ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﻟﺬﺍ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻭ ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﮕﻲ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ.
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ؟ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺳﻼﻳﻖ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ
ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺤﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻢ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﺶ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ
ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
43
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻏﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻲ
ﭼـﻮﻥ ﺍﺣﻤـﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠـﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬـﺮﻱ ﺍﺣﺴـﺎﺱ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺻﻔﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺁﻧـﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻏﻔـﺎﺭ ﺍﺳـﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨـﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻫﺸـﺘﺮﻭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳـﺘﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨـﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﭼﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﻱ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺳﻨﺠﻴﻢ
ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺣﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﺳــﻨﺠﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﺳﺖ.
ﭼﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺒﺎﻧــﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﺋﻤﻪ ﺍﻃﻬﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﻼﻙ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻼﻙﻫﺎ ﺑﺴــﻨﺠﻴﻢ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺳﻼﻳﻖ ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﻭ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﻣﻲﺳﻨﺠﻨﺪ .ﺣﻀﺮﺕ
ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ( ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺴﻨﺠﻴﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ.
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻼﻙ ﺣﻖﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﺮﻳﺰﻳﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺩﺭﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻧﻪ ﺣــﻖ ﺭﺍ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ
ﺳﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓـﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕـﺮﺍ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﺼﻞﺍﻟﺨﻄﺎﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤــﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻭ
ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺷــﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳــﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻣﺼﻮﺑــﻪ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ »ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ« ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﻪ »ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ« ﻭﺍﺭﻳﺰ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﺑﺎﺯﺭﺳــﻲ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ،ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻋﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺨﻠﻒ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ »ﻣﺨﺎﻟـﻒ« ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳـﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﭼﻬــﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻋﻀــﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻭﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻢ ﺑﻴــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻳﺎ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺑﺮﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﻳﻢ
44
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭﺁﻣـﺪ 20ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴـﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ
ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷــﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ .ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺎ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ 300ﻫــﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗــﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪﻥ 20ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ
ﺣﺎﺻــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋــﺪﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ
320ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﭼﺎﻧﻪﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﺴــﺎﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ
ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﻢ.
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺸـﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺗﺸـﻜﻴﻞ »ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳـﺎﺯﻱ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ« ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ؛ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ
ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﮔﻠﻮﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﭼﺸﻤﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ 54ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺩﺭ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ »ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ«
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﻳﺰ ﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ
ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ؟ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻛﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭﺯﻥﻛﺪﺍﻡﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﻛﺎﺭ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﻤﻲ ﻧﮕﺮﻳﺴــﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭﺯﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻛﻴﻔﻲ ﻭﺯﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ
ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫــﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﭘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯﺍﻥ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﮔﺮ 100ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ
ﺑــﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻭﻡ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋــﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﻧــﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻫﺮﻗﺪﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﺿﺮﺭ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﭼﻪ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ،
ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﺴــﻨﺠﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻭ
ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻣﺪﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺣﺪﺍﺩﻋﺎﺩﻝ
ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﻫﺸــﺘﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺴــﺘﻦ ﻟﻴﺴــﺖ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗــﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳﺮﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﺣﺪﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺟﺮﻗﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻢ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺪﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺮﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥﻧﺸــﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ،
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺁﻥ ﻋــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭼﺘــﺮ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪﻛﻪ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻱ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎ ﺳــﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺁﻥ ﻋﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﺪﺍﺩ ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻛﻢ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ،
ﺷــﺎﺋﺒﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﺳــﺘﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺯﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ژﺭﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﺩﺍﺭﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﺑﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺴــﻴﻤﻲ ،ﺟﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺷﻔﻴﻖ ﺑﺴﭙﺎﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸــﺘﻢ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒــﺎ ﻫﺮﺍﺯ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺻﺤــﻦ ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﻭ
ﻏﻴﺮ ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺩﺳــﺖ ﻭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻋﺪﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﭙﺮﺩ.
ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺲ ﻳﻚ
ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺑــﺮ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓﺗﺮ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﺑﻪﺣﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﻧــﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ
ﻣﻮﺝ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷــﻨﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﻳﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣــﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﮕﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻳﺒــﻮﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ،ﭼــﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﻳﻲ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻄﻖ ﭘﺰﺷــﻜﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺭﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺧﻄﺎﺭ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺟﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻌﺮﻩ ﻧﺰﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ ﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻧﻌﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻫﺎ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ.
ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺲ ﺩﻭ
ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳــﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴــﻪ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛــﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺷــﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﻛﺮﺳــﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻳﻖ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴــﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻳﺤﻪﺧﻮﺷﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻲﺷﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴــﻪ ،ﺩﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﺑﻨﺸﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺲ ﺳﻮﻡ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺳﻪ ﺗﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ،ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ
ﺻﺒﻐــﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 9ﻧﻔﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻪ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻛﻤﺮﻧﮓ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﺻﺤﻨﻪﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺻﺤﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﻣﻨﺘﻘــﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻭ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ،ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑــﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩ ،ﻳﻚ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴــﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﺒﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘــﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ
ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺭﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻋﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ،ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ،
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜــﻪ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋــﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ
ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﺤﺒﻲﻧﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻲﻧﻴﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺏ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﻋﺪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺴــﻴﻨﻴﺎﻥ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻴﺮﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﮔﻢﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺣﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺴــﻴﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺤﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻱ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﻳﺰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﺳــﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ،ﺣﺮﻣﺖ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﺎﺕ
ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺗﻚﺻﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺎﺭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﺳــﺘﻮﺭ
ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ،ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺸﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺁﻟﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻭﻳﺪﻩ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﺯﻝ ﮔﻤﺸﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻂﻛﺸــﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻃﻴﻒ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
45
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ 5ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺏ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺪ
ﻓﻮﺍﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ
ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ 1383ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ
ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻗــﺪﺭﺕ ،ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ 10ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ،ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﺖ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ،
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ
ﻳﺎ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻯ ﻣﺤﻮﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺷــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﻌﺎﺑﻴﺮ ﻛﻢﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺠﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻭﻱ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺴــﺮﺵ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ
ﮔﻠﺸــﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑــﻰ ﭘﻠﻰﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﻋﻤﻼ
ﺗــﺎ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1372ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪﺳــﻤﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﺭﺷــﺎﺩ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻧﺼﻴﺒﺶ ﻧﺸﺪ.
ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳــﺪ ﻭ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧــﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻛــﻢ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ،ﻭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻰ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻡﺟﻢ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺗﻮﻟﺪﻯ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﻧﺎﻣﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﺑﻰ ،ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺡﺍﻻﻣﻴﻨﻰ،
ﻣﺨﺒﺮ ﻭ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻃﻖﻧﻮﺭﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﻗﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻮﺛﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ،ﻓﺮﺻــﺖ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴــﻞ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻳﻚﺳﺎﻝ
ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ،ﺍﺑﺘــﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
46
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺯﺩ.
ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧــﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺑﺨــﺶ ،20:30ﻓﻌــﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔــﻮﻯ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺭﺷﻴﻮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺭﻭﻯ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚﺳﺎﻝ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺗﺤﺮﻙ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎ ﺑﻰﻃﺮﻓﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ
ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ،ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻚﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ 9ﻣﺎﻫﻪ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ،ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺳﺖﻛﻢ
ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﺎ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ،ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻮﻯ ﭘﺎﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ،ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ.
ﭘﺨﺶ ﻳﻚﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺣﺠﻢ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺩ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺁﺏﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﺳــﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ،ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻠﻤﺒﻴﺎ ،ﺳﻬﻤﻴﻪﺑﻨﺪﻯ
ﺑﻨﺰﻳﻦ ،ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺵ ﭘﺰﺷــﻜﻰ ،ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﻭ ...ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻳﻜﻪﺗﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻳﻚﻃﺮﻓﻪ ،ﺑﺎﺯ
ﻫﻢ ﺣﻤﻼﺕ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻭﻳﺲ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ
ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑــﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺭﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺭﺷﺪ
ﭼﺸﻤﮕﻴﺮ ﻣﺸــﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﺷــﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒــﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﺎﺷﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺁﺭﺍ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺭﺩ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻳﻚﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﻛﻢﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮﻯ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﻮﺭﭼﺸﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ،
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻒ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻰ ﺍﺛﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓ ﺳﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ،ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﺷﺘﻰ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺟﻬﺖﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ
ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﺮﭼﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷــﻮﺩ؛ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﺍﺕ ﺭﻭﺩﺭﺭﻭ
ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺸــﻰ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
20ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺳﻠﺐ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺸﺘﻌﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻫﺎﻧﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﻴﺘﻴﻨﮓ ﻣﻴــﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﻟﻴﻌﺼﺮ ﺩﺭ 24ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻫﺘﺎﻛﻰ 20:30ﻭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ
ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻰ ﻳﻚﻃﺮﻓﻪ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ،ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺎﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ،88ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻰ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺳﭙﺮﻯ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺰﺵ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺟﺎﻡﺟﻢ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ.
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺸــﺮﻭﻁ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻜﺮﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚﺳــﻮ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻒ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﻳﺰﺵ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺁﮔﻬﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺛﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺘﺶ ﺑﺮ
ﺟﺎﻡﺟﻢ ﺗﻠﺦﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰﺍﺵ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻃﺮﺩ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺘﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﮔﺸــﻮﺩﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ،ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﻚﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﻠﺖ،
ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﻜﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺣﺴﻦ ﻭﻧﺎﻳﻲ:
ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ
ﺣﺴﻦ ﻭﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﺳﺮﺳﺨﺖ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ
ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ،ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺷـﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺗﺬﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻼﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ،ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﮔﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺣﻜﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﻭ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑـﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﺠـﺪﺩ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳـﺖ ﺳـﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ،ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺷﺪ .ﻭﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺿﻤﻦ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻪﻳﻚﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﺟﺪﻱﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻳﻚﺯﻧﮓﺧﻄﺮﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ »ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ،ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﻭ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ« .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳـﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﻲﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ
ﺩﺍﻧﺴـﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺷﺪ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﭙﺴـﻨﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ،
ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻱ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻲ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫـﻢ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬـﻮﺭ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ
ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ،ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ«.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻭﻧﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻋﻤﻜﻠـﺮﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ .ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ
ﻣﻘﺘﺪﺭﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﺘﺮ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﻋﺘﻼﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻳﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ،ﺳﻨﺪ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ
20ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
1404ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ
ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ،ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺠﺎ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ ؟
ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻤــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺷــﻜﺎﻻﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠــﻲ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﺘﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﺘﺒﻠﻮﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻢﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼــﻮﺏ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿــﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﻩ
ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴــﺎﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻱ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻋﺎﻟﻴﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﺍﻫﮕﺸﺎﺳﺖ.
ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺳــﺮﻟﻮﺣﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻏﺒﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺗﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺧﻄﺮﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ،
ﺑﺨﺶ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ،ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﻭ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻄﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻲﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﺶ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺎﻣﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﭙﻮﺷﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧـﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓــﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﻚ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ ،ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻮﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻔﻆ
ﺣﺮﻣﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺭﻗﺒــﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻲ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ
ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ،ﺍﻓﺘــﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺷــﺨﺼﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ .ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺿﻌﻒ
ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ
ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺷﻨﻪ ﺁﺷــﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ
ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﭼﺸــﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ؟ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻧﻘﺸﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺳﺲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐﻫﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺳﻼﻳﻖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ،ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻮﺧﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡﺳﺎﻻﺭ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻼﻳﻖ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺷﺮﻉ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﺖﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻭﻻﻳﺖﻣﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺭﻛﻦ ﺭﻛﻴﻦ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﮕﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﺧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺭﺧﺸﺪ .ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﻇﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻝ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ،ﺻـﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼـﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺑﺮﻭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺮﮔﺮﻡ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻪﺳــﻤﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻫــﺪﺍﻑ ﻛﻼﻥ ﭘﻨﺞ
ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺯﻧــﺪﻩ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻓﻖ ﻭ
ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ؟ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺳــﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺮﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻢﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﺑﻴﻨﺪﺍﺯﻧــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﻨﺰﻝ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ.
47
ﭘﺸﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻲﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﺤﻜﻲ:
ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺳﻬﻮﻱ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻋﻠﻲﺍﺻﻐــﺮ ﻣﺤﻜﻲ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻣﻮﻗﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ» :ﻃﺒﻖ ﺭﻭﺍﻝ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺁﮔﻬﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮﻱ ﭼﺎپ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺁﺫﺭﻣﺎﻩ ﺁﮔﻬﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻌﺒﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺪﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻲ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺿﺎﻟﻪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺗﻤﺎﺱﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻔﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻜﺲ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻌﺒﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﻭﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺁﮔﻬﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺳــﻬﻮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﮔﻬﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺎ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺑﻴﺦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﮔﻬﻲ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤﺎﺕ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺭﻭﺯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻭﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻜﺲ ﭼﺎپ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﮔﻬﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ«.
ﻣﺤﻜﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﻣــﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺳــﻬﻮﺍ ﭼﺎپ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑﻪﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺁﺫﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ
ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈــﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗــﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻲ،
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﺑﺮ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺻﺤﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﭼﺎپ ﻋﻜﺲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣــﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻋﻀــﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
48
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﺗﻲ
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
ﻭﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻴﻢ
ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻓﻜــﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻀــﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ
ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺳﻬﻮﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ«.
ﻣﺤﻜــﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﻣــﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗــﻲ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻋﻀــﺎﻱ
ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ
ﻭ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻓﻴﺼﻠﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭘﺮﺗﻴﺮﺍژ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺁﮔﻬﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻬﻮﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺑﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ 99ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻜﺲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃــﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒﻫﺎ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻭﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺑﺪﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ«.
ﻭﻱ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺑﻌﺪﺍﺯﻇﻬﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﻭﻱﺧﺮﻭﺟﻲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ
ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺑﻪﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ ﺷــﺶ ﺑﻌﺪﺍﺯﻇﻬﺮ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ
ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷــﺎﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﻭﻳــﺰﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻗﻴــﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﻲﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ
ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ«.
ﻭﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺻﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﭘﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻋﺖ 8ﺷﺐ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﭘﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﭼﺎپ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ 9ﺷﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﭼﺎپ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﻭﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺭﻭﺯ ﺳﻪﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺁﺫﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻧﺸﺪ
ﻭ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻗﻀﺎﻳــﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﻣﺴــﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻟــﺬﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜــﻢ ﻣﻮﻗﺘﻲ
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻟﻐﻮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﻌﺪﺍﺯﻇﻬﺮ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺴــﺘﺮﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻐﻮ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺭﻭﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺁﺫﺭﻣﺎﻩ
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻲ ﺿﻤﻦ
ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻋﺬﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺷﺮﻳﻒ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎپ ﺁﮔﻬﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀــﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑــﺮ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ،
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ
ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪﺷﺎﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ«.
ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻮءﻧﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺿﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻬﺎﺋﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﮋﺍﺩﭘﺮﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.ﻣﺤﻜﻲﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦﮔﻔﺖ»:ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮﺍﻋﻼﻡﺯﻣﺎﻥﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪﺯﻭﺩﻱ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﺨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ«.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺒﺢ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ )ﺟﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ( ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ
ﻫــﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻃﻌﻢ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﺍ ﭼﺸــﻴﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻟﻐﻮ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺁﻥ 24ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﭘﺮﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺳﭙﺮﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻗﻔﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ،ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ
ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻴﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ» :ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ،
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ«.
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﻃﻌﻢ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ
ﻟﺤﻈﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺣﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﻭ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺗــﻼﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺕ
ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﻲ ﮔﺮﻩ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ
ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺣﻜﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ ﻣﻌــﺎﻭﻥ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ 20:30
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﭘﺮﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﭘﺎﻓﺸﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ» :ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﻮﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﺑﻪﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ،ﺑﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺮﻳﻪ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻋﺬﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻠﻒ ﻭﻋﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻛﺮﺩ «.ﺩﻳﺮﻱ ﻧﭙﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ،
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺗﻴﺮﺍژ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺳــﻠﻴﻤﻲﻧﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺳﺮﺳﺨﺖ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺟﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻟﺤﻈﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻓﻪ
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺩﻳﺮﻭﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷــﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴــﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺎﺳﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺳــﻠﻴﻤﻲﻧﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﭘﺴــﻨﺪ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﭼﻪ ﻭﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻋﻤﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻣﻲﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﺩ:
»ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮﻳﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺁﮔﻬﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﺍﻻﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ«.
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲﻧﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺎ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺣﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺣﻞ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻧﺸﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻎ ﺻﺪﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻤﻜﺶﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻧﺸﺮﻳﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭ ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﺤﻜﻲ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻱ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻤﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻗــﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓــﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ» :ﺣﻜﻢ ﺭﻓــﻊ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻃﻲ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ «.ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻗﺎﻳﻘﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻣﺤﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺯﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺸﻴﺮﻱﺭﺍﺩ،
ﻛﻼﻡ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗــﺎ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ،ﺻﺒﺢ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺷــﻨﺒﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑــﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ» :ﺷــﻌﺒﻪ 29ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻊ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺑﻬﺸﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱ ،ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺁﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ 24ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ ﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﮔﻼﻳﻪﻫــﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻣﺒﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ
ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﺟﺤﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭ ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺑﺎﺳﭽﻲ،
ﺑﻪﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﻜــﺮﺩﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﻏﻴﺮﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺒﻲ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺭﻧﮕــﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻴﻤــﺖ ﭘﻨﺞﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻃﻲ
ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻏﻴﺮﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺑﺎﺳﭽﻲ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻋﻄﺮﻳﺎﻧﻔﺮ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻲ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﭼــﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻲ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺸــﺮ ﻏﻴﺮﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ،
ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ.
49
50
www.mosalas.ir
®±µ²H¸ÃM
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺗﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﻋﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺑﺪﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ .ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﻥ 19ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺪﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ .
51
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﺟﻪﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﻟﺤﻪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ -ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ
ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ
ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﻭﺷــﻨﺒﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻨﺪﻣﻴــﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴــﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤــﻰ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻥﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻘﺸــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻰﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺸﻰ ﻓﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻰﺻﺪﺍﻗﺘﻰ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.ﺑﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ
ﺍﻳﺴــﻨﺎ ،ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤــﺪﻱ ﺑﻴﻐــﺶ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺷــﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ ﮔﻔﺖ:
»ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻫﻴــﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤــﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ
20ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.ﺍﻭ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺍﮔﺮ 200ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺻﺒﺮ ﻛﻨﻴــﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ«.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ
ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻫﺮﻡ
ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻫﺮﺟﺎ
ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧــﺪ ﻭﻋﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮﺟﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻞﺷﺎﻥ ﺣﻞ ﺷﺪ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﻊﺍﻟﻮﻗﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ«.ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﺶ
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﺪ ،ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ«.
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
52
ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺍﺳﻂ ﺩﻫﻪ 90ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻫﺮﻣﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺳﺮﮔﺌﻰ ﺷﻤﺎﺗﻜﻮ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ
ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ
ﺳــﺎﻝ 2009ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ «.ﺍﻭ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ »ﺑﺮﻭﺯ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻳﻞ ﻓﻨﻰ« ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺭﻭﺳــﻰ ﮔﻔــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻧﺸــﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ »ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ
ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺎﻩ ﻓﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﻰ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﻃﺮﻑ ﺭﻭﺳــﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﻖ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ
ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ
ﻭﻋﺪﻩ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ »ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ«
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ
ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﻧﺼﺪ ﻣﮕﺎﻭﺍﺕ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ژﻭﺋﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ،1999
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻓﺘﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺩﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ،
ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻨﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻃﺮﺡ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ،ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ »ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ« ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﻯ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺴــﺎﺕ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ
ﻫــﺪﻑ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ،ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻧﺼﺐ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻰﺧﻄﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺴــﺎﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﻰ ﻣﺠﺮﻯ ﻃﺮﺡ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺍﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺳﺎﻝ ،2007
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺳﻮﺧﺖ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ
ﺭﻭﺳﻰ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻏﻨﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺳــﻰ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ
ﺳــﻮﺧﺖ ﺷــﺶ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ،
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻗﻄﻌﻰ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻧﺸﺪ.
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺳﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﻤﻴﺘﺮﻯ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ﻛﻪ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ،
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻰﮔﻔﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻯﺍﺵ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺍﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ
ﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ
ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺼﺎﺭﻑ ﺻﻠﺢﺁﻣﻴﺰ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻣﺼﺎﺭﻑ ﺻﻠﺢﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﻯ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1995ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ
ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺯﻳﻤﻨﺲ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ
ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1979ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ -1357-ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﻟﻪ ﺳﻮﺧﺖ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﻏﻨﻰﺷﺪﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 2007ﺑﻪ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺳﻮﺧﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ
ﺁﻥ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭘﺴﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﺳــﻮﺧﺖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻏﻨﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﻣﻨﺼﺮﻑ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻏﻨﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ 3/5ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻏﻨﻰﺷﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻏﻨﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺗﺎ 19/8ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﻠﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳــﻮﺧﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﻪ ﺳﻮﺧﺖ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺼﺮﻑ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺼﺐ
ﺳﭙﺮ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻬﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﭼﻚ ،ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺥ ﻛﺮﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻰ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻡ
ﺑﻪ S -300ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ
ﻣﻮﺷــﻜﻰ S -300ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺳﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻭﺣﻴﺪﻯ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻰ S -300ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺣــﺎﻝ ،ﻛﺎﻇــﻢ ﺟﻼﻟﻰ ،ﺳــﺨﻨﮕﻮﻱ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑــﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ
ﻣﻮﺷــﻜﻰ 300-sﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻗﻮﻟﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﭘﺮﺳﺘﻴﮋ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣــﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫــﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻱ
ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﺗﻚﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﺗﻚﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ «.ﺟﻼﻟﻲ ﺑــﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﭙﻮﺷﺎﻧﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺫﻫﻦﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ«.ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺣﺎﻝ،
ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻲﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﻖ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻰﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ
ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻱ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ» :ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻠﺴــﺎﺕ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻛﻨﺪ «.ﺍﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺨﻠﻒ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ
ﻃﺮﺡ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺤﺺ ﺍﺯ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﻗﻮﻟﻰ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺤﺺ ﺍﺯ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.ﺍﻳﺴﻨﺎ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺤﺼﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺠﺎ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺷﻮﺩ «.ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺳﺎﻝ 2000ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ 9ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ«.
ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﻤﻲ
ﻣﺸــﺎﺑﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ 4-5ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻃﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﻭﺳﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻢﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ
ﻭﺳﺎﻳﻞ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦﻛﻪ
ﻃﺒﻖ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺭﻭﺳــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﻣﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻞ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺣﺸﻤﺖﺍﷲ
ﻓﻼﺣﺖﭘﻴﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﮔﻔــﺖ» :ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﺍﻧــﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﮔﺴﺘﺎﺧﻲ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ «.ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺍﺳﻼﻡﺁﺑﺎﺩ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ
ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻋﻼءﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻭﺟﺮﺩﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻇﻬــﺎﺭ ﺑﻰﺍﻃﻼﻋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻈــﺮ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮﮔﻔﺖ:
»ﺑﺎﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸــﻰ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﺘﺎﺑﺰﺩﻩ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺭﺳﺪ«.ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ
ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻰ S - 300ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙﺗﺎﻳﻤــﺰ ،ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻃﻰ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ
ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﻤﻴﺘﺮﻯ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻭﻋﺪﻩ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﻣﻮﺷــﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺼﺐ
ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﭙﺮ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﻕ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﻨﺼﺮﻑ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ،
ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺷــﻜﻰ S -300ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻳﻰ
ﻭ ﺍﻧﺼــﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤــﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺼﺐ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻮﺷــﻜﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﻟﻬﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﭼﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﺟﻪﺍﻟﻤﺼﺎﻟﺤﻪ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
53
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺳﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ:
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻰ
ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻨﺪﻣﻴﻦ ﺑـﺎﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﭘﻰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷـﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﻋﺪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ
ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﺑـﻪ ﺧﺼـﻮﺹ ﺷـﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨـﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻰ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻰﺻﺪﺍﻗﺘﻰ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺳﻨﺎﻳﻰ،
ﺩﺍﻧﺸـﻴﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸـﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻬـﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ 5+1ﺑﻴﻨﺠﺎﻣﺪ ﺗـﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﺗﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺷـﻨﺎﺱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﺩﺭ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫـﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴـﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻓﻜـﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﺸـﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭﺩﺳﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺣﺠﻢ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺗﺸـﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼـﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ
ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ،ﺁﺳـﻴﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻗﻔﻘﺎﺯ -ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺱ -ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻛﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟـﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧـﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨـﺶ ﺩﻳﮕـﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻳـﺶ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺧﻼﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑـﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ
ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺴـﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺒـﺖ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫـﺎﻯ ﺗﺤﺮﻳـﻢ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ
ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﺘﺤـﺪ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ
ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞﻛﻨﻨـﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻧـﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺿﺎﻓـﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺟﻤﺎﻫﻴﺮ ﺷـﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﻇﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺳـﻨﺎﻳﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺸﻨﺞﺯﺩﺍﻳﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﺐ
ﻗﻮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑـﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻨﺪﻣﻴﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴـﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷـﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫـﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎﺭ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺪﻫﻰﻫـﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷـﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧـﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻓﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻰ
ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻓﻨﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺩﺳﺖﺍﻧﺪﺭﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ
ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻓﻨﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
54
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ژﺍﭘﻨﻰﻫﺎ
ﺑﻨﺎ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻳﻚ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻯ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺭﻭﺳﻰ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻄﻌﺎﺕ
ﻭ ﻭﺳﺎﻳﻞ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﺳﻰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ
ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻧﺮﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ
ﺑﻰﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ
ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ،
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ،ﺣﺴﺎﺱﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ،ﺑﺨﺶ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ،ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺣﺴﺎﺱﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑــﻂ ﻣﻨﻄﻘــﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺳــﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺑﺤﺚ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ
ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ،5+1ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺑﻴﻨﺠﺎﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﺗﺮ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺳﻮﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥﻫﻢ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻰ
ﻓﻌﺎﻝﺗﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻝﺗﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﺗـﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳـﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻝﺗﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﭼﻴﺴـﺖ؟
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭼـﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳـﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻝﺗﺮ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺗﺤﺮﻙﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ
ﻣﻮﺷـﻚﻫﺎﻯ S -300ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷـﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ؟
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺁﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻠﻰ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭﺩﺳﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ
ﺣﺠﻢ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ
ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻍ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺘﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺘﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳــﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﺳـﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﻨﻰ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﻰ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻫﺮﻡ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﺮ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﮔﺮﺟﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻛﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺸـﺎﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺳـﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺍﺳـﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮﻯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰﻛﻪ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻭ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻳﺎ ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ.
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﻣﺎﻧﻨــﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻨــﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﻙﺑﻨﺪﻯﻫﺎ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻭ
ﺑﻠﻮﻙﺑﻨﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻭﺍﻝ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺒﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻴﻢ .ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺑﻠﻮﻙﺑﻨﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ.
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﺁﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺿﻤﻦ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺟﻤﺎﻫﻴﺮ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻰ ﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﻝ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﻭ ﺯﻭﺍﻝ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺒﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ
ﻧﻈﻢ ﺗــﻚ ﻗﻄﺒﻰ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻰﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺗﻚﻗﻄﺒﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻠﻮﻙﺑﻨﺪﻯﻫﺎ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎ ،ﻫﻴﭽﻮﻗﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻴﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻــﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﻝ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺘﺒﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺷﻔﺎﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺱ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳــﻨﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ
ﻣﻠﻰﺷــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺣﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩ ،ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ
ﻭ ﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻣﻰﭼﺮﺧﺪ ﻭ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﻨﺠﺮﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻧﺴﺒﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻛﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ
ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ
ﻭ ﺣﻔــﻆ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻇﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﻣﻰﺍﻳﺴﺘﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ 5+1
ﺩﺳــﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻇﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻇﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ ،ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﻇﺮﻑ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻯ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺟﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻞ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ! ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺟﻤﺎﻫﻴﺮ ﺷـﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺩﻭﻗﻄﺒﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠـﻞ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳـﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﻧـﻰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧـﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻜﻤﻔﺮﻣﺎ ﻛـﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠـﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ
ﺗﻚﻗﻄﺒﻰ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳـﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕﻫـﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑـﻪ ﻧﻈـﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨـﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻫـﻰ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰ ﺑـﺮ ﺟﻬـﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻗﻄﺒـﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﺍﺳـﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻕ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺜﻼ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﻯ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﻣﻠﻰ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﺪ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳــﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻕ ،ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻫﮋﻣﻮﻧﻰ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻜﻴﻢ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﺎﻁ ﺧﻠﻮﺕ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻗﻔﻘﺎﺯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥﻫــﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻋﻤﻠﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺰﻩ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﺵ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﺑﺮﺟﺴــﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺗﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ .ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟــﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻩﻫــﺎ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﭼﺸﻢﭘﻮﺷــﻰ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺣﺠﻢ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ
ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻼﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦﻫﻢ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺷﻤﻨﻰ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺧﺼﻮﻣﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻰﺩﺭﭘﻰ ،ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻩﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕﺑﺸﺮ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺟﻬــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳــﻰ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥﻣﺪﺕ ﺗﻨﻮﻉ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟــﻰ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼــﻮﺹ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺮﻡ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﭘﺲ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺗﺎﻳﻴـﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤـﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻـﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻣﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻣـﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺩﻛﺘـﺮ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻰ ﻛـﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔـﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨـﺪ .ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻮﺷـﺘﻪ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ،
ﺳـﭙﺲ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﺷـﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮﻳﻰ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻰ S -300ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﻋﺪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺍﺗﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺭﻭﺳـﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻰﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳــﺮﺩ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ،ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨــﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻭ ﻗﻔﻘﺎﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ،ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻭ
ﺳﻠﻄﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷـﺘﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧـﻰ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ
ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺟﻤﺎﻫﻴﺮ ﺷـﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺍﺳﻼﻡﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻫﺮﺍﺱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺍﺳـﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗــﻊ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ،ﻧﺎﺗــﻮ ،ﺭژﻳــﻢ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻰ ﻭ
ﻻﺑﻰ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ،
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻃﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ؟
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪﺩﺷﻤﻨﻰﻫﺎﺭﺍﺑﺎﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺑﻪﻣﻨﺼﻪﻇﻬﻮﺭﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﮔﺎﻡﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺗﻨﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪﻯﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﺮﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ .ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ .ﭼﻴﻦ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ،
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺑﺎﺁﻧﻬﺎﺑﺮﺍﻯﻣﺎﻣﻬﻢﻭﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻣﻴﺎﻥﺳﻪﻛﺸﻮﺭﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺣﺎﺋﺰﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺸﻨﺞﺯﺩﺍﻳﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﻗﻄﺒﻰ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻄﺐﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻟﻰﺩﺭﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﻤﺎﻥﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩﻛﻨﻴﻢﻛﻪﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﻤﺎﻥﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﺑﻪ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯﺧﺎﺻﻰﻧﺸﻮﺩ.ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻛﻪﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮﻛﺮﺩﻡﻣﺎﺑﻪﻳﻚﺗﺸﻨﺞﺯﺩﺍﻳﻰ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻭﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﺳﺎﺯﻯﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﺩﺭﻋﺮﺻﻪﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰﻣﺎﻥﻧﻴﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﻭﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﻫﻢﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪﺑﻪﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊﺍﻧﺮژﻯ،ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊﻗﻮﻯﻭﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞﺗﺮﺍﻧﺰﻳﺘﻰﻛﻪﺩﺭ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺩﺍﺭﺩﺣﻮﺯﻩﺍﻯﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯﺑﺰﺭگﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﺍﺯﺁﻥ
ﭼﺸﻢﭘﻮﺷﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪﻭﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺩﻟﻴﻞﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻯﺭﺍﺑﺎﺯﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪﺑﺮﺍﻯﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﻗﻄﺐﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ
ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﺳﺎﺯﻯﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﺩﻫﺪ.
55
ﻳﻚ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﺁﺭﺯﻭ ﺩﻳﻠﻤﻘﺎﻣﻲ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ 27ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻃﻲ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻭﻛﺴﻞ،
ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻚ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ،ﻫﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻚ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻛﺮﺳﻲ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﻣﻔﺎﺩ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﺑﺮﺳــﺮﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺳﻲ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ،ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻪﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﺷــﺘﻮﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﺴــﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺒﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻲ
ﻫﻤﺴﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺁﺷﺘﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﻲ ،ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺘﻲ ،ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1999ﺑﻪﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ
ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻭ ﭘﺴــﺖ ﻛﻢ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻟﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﺪﻟﺴﻮﻥ ،ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻧﺮ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﻛﺴﻞ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2008ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺳﺮﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺤﺮﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
56
ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟــﻲ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﺷــﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ
ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﻠﺮ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﺷﺘﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ
ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﺨﺺﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻠﺮ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮ ،ﺩﻳﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺒﻨﺪ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﻴﺘﺮ ﻣﻨﺪﻟﺴﻮﻥ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﺣﺮﺍﺯ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭﻱ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺣﺰﺑﻲ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﺠﺪﺩﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺁﺷﺘﻮﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺷﻨﻮﻧﺪﻩ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻧﮕﻼ ﻣﺮﻛﻞ ،ﺻﺪﺭﺍﻋﻈﻢ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﺮﺑﺎﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻲ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺷﺪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﺷﺘﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺷﮕﻔﺘﻲ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ«.
ﺳــﺨﻨﮕﻮﻱ ﮔﻮﺭﺩﻭﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻭﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ،ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﻼﺵ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﺪﻱ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻛﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺁﺷــﺘﻮﻥ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻨﺪﺩ .ﻫﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺷﺶ ﻣﺎﻫﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺰﻳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ 27ﻋﻀﻮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻧﻤﺎﻱ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﻳﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ:
»ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ
ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺑــﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺟﻮﻱ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﺘﺨﺐ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻓــﺰﻭﺩ» :ﻫﺮ ﻣﻠﺘﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺬﺍﻛــﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﻭ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ
ﺑﻪﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ«.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻟﻴﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺗﺎﺯﮔﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ 27ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺸﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻟﻴﺴﺒﻮﻥ
ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻟﻴﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺍﺳﻂ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﻭﺍﺳﻼﻭ ﻛﻼﻭﺱ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﭼﻚ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ،
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﺍﺕ ﭘﻴﺸــﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1957ﺑﻪﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻡ،
ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴــﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﻫــﺪﻩ ﺭﻡ ،ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ
ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﺍﺕ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﺎﺳــﺘﺮﻳﺨﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ،1993ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﺁﻣﺴﺘﺮﺩﺍﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
1999ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2001ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﺪ .ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺗﺴﺮﻳﻊ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ
ﺩﻻﻳﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻟﻴﺴــﺒﻮﻥ
ﺗﺮﻏﻴﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺳﻲ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﻪﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ
ﻭ ﺍﺑــﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻱ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻭ ﻭﺯﻳــﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﻪﺷــﺮﻳﻜﻲ ﻗﻮﻱﺗﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻭﻟــﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﺳــﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻮﺟــﺐ ﻧﻮﻣﻴﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻲﻫﺎ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻛــﻪ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﭘﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻀﻮ
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻛﺮﺳﻰ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﺩﻭﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺷــﺶ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ
ﺷــﻮﺭﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻟﻴﺴــﺒﻮﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩﻣﺪﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻓــﺮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺣﺎﻻ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﭼﻴﻦ
ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺳﺒﺐ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ
ﺑﻪﺳﻬﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺟــﺎﻱ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ،
ﺗﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﻠﺮ ،ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﺪﻯ ﭘﺴﺖ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﭘﺴــﺖ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﺮ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻴﺸﻞ ﺑﺎﺭﻧﻴﺮ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻧــﮕﻼ ﻣﺮﻛﻞ ،ﺻﺪﺭﺍﻋﻈﻢ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﮔﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺴــﺖ ﻣﺠﺪﺩﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺷــﺪ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ
ﻟﻴﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ،ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﺑﻮﺵ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺐ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘــﺎﻁ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺵ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻧﺴﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺳﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ،ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻘﺶ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺣﺎﻻ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺑﻪﺳﻮﻯ
ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﻪﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺗﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺑﻰﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺮﻣــﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻳــﺎ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘــﺎ ﭼﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫــﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ،ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻯ ﻻﺗﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻳﻢ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﻧﺮﻣﺶ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﻳﺎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﻰﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ
ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻰ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭﺍﺯ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺭﺳﺪ ،ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ
ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳــﺖ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻭ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣــﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓﺗﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ
ﻳﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﻔﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ،
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺳﻪ ﺭﻛﻦ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ 5+1ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳــﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳــﻬﻢ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻪﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ
ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻯ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﺷﺮﻗﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩ ﻛﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻧﺎﺁﺷﻨﺎ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻫﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﻡ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ،ﭘﻨﺠﺸﻨﺒﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻳﻰ ،ﻛﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺍ َﺷـﺘﻮﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﺪ .ﺳﻮﺋﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻫﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻯ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺴـﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ،
ﺗﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﻠﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺷـﺎﻡ ﭘﻨﺠﺸـﻨﺒﻪ ﺷﺐ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺳﻮﺋﺪ ﺷـﺪﻧﺪ.ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ
ﺁﺷـﺘﻮﻥ ،ﻛﻤﻴﺴـﺮ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ،ﻣﻘـﺎﻡ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ ،ﻛﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﺷﺘﻮﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺧﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ،
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷـﺪ .ﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻦﺍ ِﻧﺪﻩ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﻫﻠﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻳﺎﺳـﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻫﺮﻣـﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ-ﻣﺴـﻴﺤﻰ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻓﻼﻧﺪﺭﻯ )ﻫﻠﻨﺪﻯﺯﺑﺎﻥ( ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻯ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮژﻩ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩ ﻛﻴﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻧﻪﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴــﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻧﻮﺑﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﺪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨــﻮﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻋﺎﻣﻞ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺴــﺖ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ )ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ،ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ(
ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﺶ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ .ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ
ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺴــﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ -ﻧﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻟﺰﻭﻣﺎ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ -ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻧﺎﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ.
ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﺎﻳﻞ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻧﺎﻓﺬ ﻭ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﻭﺳﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﻉ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻫﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻟﻴﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ،ﻭﺍژﻩ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻟﻴﺴــﺒﻮﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭘﺴــﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎ ﻧﺎﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻼء ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﭼـﻪ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑـﻂ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺑــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻡ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻓﻮﺭﻱ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺨﺺ ﻓﻌﻼ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻧﺎﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ
ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ،ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ،ﻛﻤﺎﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ،ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳــﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻓﻌﻼ ﻣﺎﻳﻞ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻤﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ
ﺍﻋﻤــﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻗــﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺭﻭﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
57
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳــﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻳــﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻄﺢ
ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩﻣﺪﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺟﺪﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ،ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻼءﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺁﻗــﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺧﻄﺎ ﭘﻴﺶﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﺘﻨﻔﺬ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ،ﺳــﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺑﻪﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ -ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ -ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑـﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﺭﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺷـﺮﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻧـﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻗﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺭﻭﭘـﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻳــﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧــﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺮﺍ ﻭ
ﻧﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳــﺖ .ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺷﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﻭﺯﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﻀﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘـﺎ ﺑﻌـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ؟ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫـﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺮﻙ ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙـﻮﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺷـﺨﺼﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷـﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪ
ﺑﻲﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻧﻪ ،ﺑﻲﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻳﺎ
ﻣﻨﺼﺒﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ
58
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺤﺚ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺑﻮﺭﻭﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻚ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻓﻌﻼ
ﺑﺤﺚ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻘﺪﻭﻧﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻓﻌــﻼ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻮﺍﺭﺽ ﺑﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺸــﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕــﻲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﺭﺽ ﺁﻥ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧــﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻌﻼ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻟﻴﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﺘﻔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺴـﺘﺮﺵ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﺗﺮﻱ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻳﻚ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ
ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﭘﺎﺷـﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻟﻴﺴﺒﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳــﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺩﻏﺎﻡ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﻧﻬــﺎﺩ -ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ -ﻳــﻚ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ،ﻧﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﻤﺼﻪ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴــﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﺵﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥﻫﻢ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻧﺎﺁﺭﺍﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻲ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺵ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ،
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻟﻴﺴــﺒﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻟﻴﺴﺒﻮﻥ
ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺷــﺒﻴﻦ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ
ﻛﻠﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴــﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺗﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ .ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺴﺮﻓﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﻓﺮﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ.
ﺑﺪﻩ ﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻋﺎﻗﺒﺖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳـﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺯﻳـﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟـﻪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺩﻭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻧﺎﺷـﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﭘﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺮﺳـﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻔﺎﺧﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺷـﺎﻧﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻘﺶﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﺒﻲ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﻦﺑﺴﺘﻲ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺧﺘﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﺷﮕﻔﺘﻲ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﺷﺪ .ﺣﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ
ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻃﻲ ﺳـﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺑﻌﺪﺍﺯﻇﻬﺮ ﻛﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﺷـﺘﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴـﻲ ﺍﻭﻟﻴـﻦ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻫﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺷﺎﻡ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺁﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻏـﻮﺵ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﺳـﺘﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺭﻫﺒـﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﺑﺒﺎﻟﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺑـﺎﺕ ﻣﻬﺮ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣـﻲ ﺗﻌﺼﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ .ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺮﺳـﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻲﻧﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﺷﺘﻮﻥ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ .ﻭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ
ﺷﻮﻛﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻖ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺗﺎ ﺻﺒﺢ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺳﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺴـﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻭ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻣﺤﺘﺸﻤﻲ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺷـﻨﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔـﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳـﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺑـﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺤﻪ ﻣﻨﺠـﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ،ﻓـﺮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺸﺎﻛﺶ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻜﻮﻓﻦﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻜﻲﻫﺎ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻱﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﻠﮋﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺪﻩ ﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﻠﺮ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘــﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ
ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺤﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﻛﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﺷﺘﻮﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴــﺲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ 27ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻫﺮ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺤﻪﺍﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﻩ ﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﻭﻟــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺮﺧــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﻠﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻮﺷــﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻳﻮﺭﻭ ﻭ ﺷﻨﮕﻦ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ
ﻣﺴــﻠﻢ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻋﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺤﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻳﺴــﻚ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖ
ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑــﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻓــﺮﺩ ﻗﻮﻱﺗــﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺘﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭﻳﺰﻣﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺘﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤــﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ
ﻗﻄﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ،ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴــﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﻫﺎ،
ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﺷﻤﺎﭼﻨﻴﻦﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﻲﭼﻪﺗﺒﻌﺎﺗﻲﺩﺭﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲﻭ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲﺍﺵ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻘــﺶ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞﺗﺮ،
ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻗﻮﻳﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﺒﺮﺩ
ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﺶ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ ﺷﺪ .ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ ،ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ ﺷﺪ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓﺗﺮ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻻﺕ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠــﻲ ،ﻓﺮﺍﺁﺗﻼﻧﺘﻴﻜــﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ
ﻣﺎ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ،ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻱ
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ؟ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑـﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ،ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻗﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﻃﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻌﻀﻼﺕ ،ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻱ ﻳﻜﺪﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ،ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻕ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﺮﺍﺯﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻫﻤﺴــﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻢﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ 5+1ﻫﻤﺴﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑـﻪ ﻋﻀﻮﮔﻴـﺮﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘـﺎ ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳـﺪ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﺮﻙ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛـﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻗـﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺑـﺎ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳـﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻗـﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺷـﺨﺼﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺴـﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺩﺧﺎﻟـﺖ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫـﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻋﻀﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻓﺘــﺮﺍﻕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺤــﺚ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻋﻀﻮ ،ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻦ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺑﻲ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻝ 2006ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ 40ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻲ
ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺳﻨﮓ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻛﻤﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ،ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻕ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﭼﻚ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻦ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻣﭙﻮﻱ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﻭ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺻﻼ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳــﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻭ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 1949ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺵ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴــﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻛﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﻭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺗﻪ
ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻌﺎﻳﺒﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ
ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ،
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻤﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺳــﻬﻢ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻭﺍﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺎﺕ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
59
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭﺁﻳﻨﻪﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ
ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻫﮋﻣﻮﻧﻲ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ژﺍﭘﻦ،
ﺳﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻩﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ
12ﺗﺎ 19ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒــﺮ 88/8/22) 2009ﺗﺎ
(88/8/28ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﺳــﻴﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ
ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺍﻗﻴﺎﻧﻮﺱ ﺁﺗﻼﻧﺘﻴﻚ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻗﻴﺎﻧﻮﺱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺳــﻮﺍﺣﻞ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻗﻴﺎﻧﻮﺱ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﻳﺎ
ﭘﺎﺳﻴﻔﻴﻚ ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻓﺮﺍ ﭘﺎﺳﻴﻔﻴﻜﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﻓﺮﺍ ﺁﺗﻼﻧﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻫﺸﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅ
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺭﻛﻮﺭﺩﺩﺍﺭﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻮﻉ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺳﻔﺮ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ؟ »ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ«» ،ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ« ﻭ »ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ« ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺳﻮﺩﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻟﻒ :ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻲﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻛﻼﻥ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻛﻼﻥ ،ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ،ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﻻﺗﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎ
ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻛﻼﻥ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﻮﻗﻒﻫﺎ،
ﻣﺸــﺤﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫــﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑــﻂ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻭ
ﭼﻨﺪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻻﺳﻜﺎ
60
ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﺧﻄﺮ ﮔﺴﻴﻞ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ
ﻛﻞ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺲ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ
ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻨــﻮﺍﻝ ،ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺟﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﺘﻮ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺷﺎﻧﮕﻬﺎﻱ ﻭ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺳــﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳــﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ
ﺁﺳﻴﺎ -ﭘﺎﺳﻴﻔﻴﻚ ،ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ،ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ
ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ،ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﭼﻨﺪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ،ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻭ
ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻧﻔﻜﺎﻙ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ
ﺷﺮﻕ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺍﻭﭘﻚ
ﮔﻔــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿــﺮ 350ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺳــﺮﮔﺮﻡ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻱ
ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺏ :ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ
ﺑﻪﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ،ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻕ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ژﺍﭘــﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ
50ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻩﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻜﻴــﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻴــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴــﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳــﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴــﻦ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﻭ ﭘﻜﻦ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ
) (Straregic Trustﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺁﺗﻲ
ژﻧﺮﺍﻝ ﭼﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﮕﻞ ،ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ
ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴــﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ
ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻕ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺟــﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﭘﺮﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺮﻩ ﺷــﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﻤﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﭼﻴــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ -ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ -ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻳﻜــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﺸــﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ،
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﮔﻮﺳﻦ
ﻭ ﺷــﻮﻻﺭﻳﭻ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﮕﻲ ﻭﺍژﻩ Chemericaﺭﺍ ﻭﺿﻊ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴــﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ 800ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﻗﺮﺿﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ
ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 10ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻚ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻣﺮﻫﻮﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻧﻄﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺍﭘﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺵ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ
ﻭ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺳــﻮﻱ ﺍﻗﻴﺎﻧﻮﺱ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ
ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ 60ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ
ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ 300 ،ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﻘﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺳﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ 1965ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ 500ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑــﻪ 37/500ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭ
ﺑﻪﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺝ :ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ
ﺑﻪﻫــﻢ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎ،
ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺟﺪﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻛﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻔﻦ ﻛﻠﻴﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ Fonigan Poleicyﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ،
ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺳﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﭼﻴــﻦ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑــﺎ ﺩﺯﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻮﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻓﻆ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﻩﺷﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺧﻂ ﺍﺗﻤﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺮﻩﺷﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺮﻩﺷــﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻏﺸﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻩ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺟﺰﻳﺮﻩ ﻛﺮﻩ ،ﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ
ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﺩﺭﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ،
ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﮋﻣﻮﻧﻴﻚ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ
ﻣﻬﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﻧﮕﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺳــﻔﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻔــﺎﻱ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﻳﺪ.
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
www.mosalas.ir
jI~T¤H
ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﻨﺪﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻫﻠﻴﺖ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
61
ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﻳﻢ
ﺍﺭﺳﻼﻥ ﻓﺘﺤﻰﭘﻮﺭ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ
ﺍﺻــﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠــﻒ ﺯﻣﺎﻧــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﺑــﺎﺯﻭﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗــﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻗــﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻈــﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ
ﺁﻥ ﻗﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ
ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﺻــﻞ 44ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩﺍﻯ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﺎ ﻛﻤﻜﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺒﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﻨﺪﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ
ﺗﻠﻘــﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻫﻠﻴﺖ
ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴــﺮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺨﺶﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣــﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﺻــﻼﺡ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺳﻨﺪ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ
20ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﺪﻱﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺧﺮﻳــﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣــﺎ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻇﺮﻑ
ﺳــﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋــﺪﻡ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻫﻚﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺣﺎﻃﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺻﻨﻌﺖﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺮﺗﻴــﺐ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥ
ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺸﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ
ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪﺳﺮﻋﺖ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻧﺤﻮ ﺍﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ.
62
ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻲ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻃﻰ
ﻣﺎﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺸــﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻓﻀــﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫــﺎﻯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬــﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ
ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳــﺶ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨــﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫــﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺘﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺟﺪﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ
ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺳﺮﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻃﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺮﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ
ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻃﻰ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ
44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ» :ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻗﺖﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﻲ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﺧﺴﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﻢ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﻨﺎﻱ
ﺳﻨﺪ ﭼﺸــﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﻨﻈﻢ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣــﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻟﺴــﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻤﺮ ﻫﻤﺖ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺷــﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﺳﺎﻥﺗﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺎﻧﻪ
ﺧﺎﻟــﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ .ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﺭﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﻛﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﻭﻻ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﺘﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ
ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻃﻰ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺧﻄﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔــﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺏ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺗﺎﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺗﺸــﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ
ﻃﻰ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺭﻫــﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﭼﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫــﺎﻯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺨــﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺭﻭﻧــﺪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺷــﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻰﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﺭﺟﺎﻧﻴﻮﺯ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤــﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ
ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﺭ
ﺳــﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘــﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﺍﻧﺪﺭﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﻓﺘــﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻨﺎﺳــﺒﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ،
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﺳﺎﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻧﺪﺭﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻄﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ
ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﻰ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﻰ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺟﺎﻧﻴﻮﺯ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺳﻤﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻮﺷــﺖ» :ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44
ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺳﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺭﺍ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺭﺟﺎﻧﻴﻮﺯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺟﺎﻧﻴﻮﺯ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﭙﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔــﺮ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺧــﻰ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ:
»ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ،ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﺪﻯﮔﺮﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ،ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﺨﺼﻴﺺ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺯﻳــﻊ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ
ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﻮﻥﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ 25ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻯ ﺗﻌــﺎﻭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ ،44ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ
44ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺳﺎﻝ 93ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ«.
ﻛﻤﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺟﺎﻧﻴﻮﺯ ،ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣــﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺠــﺎﺩ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻛﻼﻡ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌــﺎﻻﻥ ﺑﺨــﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻧــﺪﺭﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻫﺮﻣﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺻﺤﺖ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻗﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺷﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺷــﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗــﻊ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﻰ ،ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ،ﺗﺤﺖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻲ،
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺰﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻱ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﻐﻔﻮﻝ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﻼﺣﻈــﺎﺕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤــﻮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺒﺐ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ،ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻧﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ،ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺭﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ،
ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﺑﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ،
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻐﻠﻮﺏ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺷــﺎﺋﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺑﺨﺶﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥﺣﻀﻮﺭﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰﺩﺭﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺣﺘﻢ ﺯﻳﺎﻥﺑﺎﺭﺗﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮﺩﺭﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲﻛﻪﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﺩﺭﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻭﺟﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﺩﺑﻪﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﻣﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺿﺪﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ ﺑﻪﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺷــﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺯﻳﺎﻥﺑﺎﺭﺗــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫــﺎ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻼﺣﻈــﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﺟﺰﻭﻛﺎﺭﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﻴﺮﺩﻭﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺑﺎﻳﺪﻧﻘﺸﻪﺭﺍﻩﺯﻣﺎﻧﺒﻨﺪﻱ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺮ
ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪﻣﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻼﺕ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳــﻲ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﭘﻴﭽﻴــﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺛﺒــﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻗﻄﻊﻣﺸﻤﻮﻝﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎﻱﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲﻛﻪﺑﺮﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ
ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺭﺍﻧﺖﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺗﺤﺖ
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
63
ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﻍ ﺳﺎﻝ 86ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ .ﻓﻮﺟﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺳــﺒﻖ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﺳﺒﻖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻒ ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﻛــﻪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻣــﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﮔﺮﻩ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻭ
ﻣﺪﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳــﻚ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻟﺒﻴﻚ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻬﺰﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺪﺭﺯ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻜﻮﻱ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻬﺰﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﻲ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷــﺎﻧﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻒ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﺯﻣﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺯﻱ ،ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﻳﻲﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﻣﻬﺮﻋﻠﻴﺰﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﺰﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ .ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﻳﻲﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺰﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻋــﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻗﺼﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﻒ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻬﺮﻋﻠﻴﺰﺍﺩﻩ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑــﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ
ﺑﻪﮔﻮﺷﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ.
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺁﺭﺍﻱ ﺭﺍﻱﺩﻫﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
64
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﻍ ﺳﺎﻝ
86ﺭﻗﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺳــﺎﻝ 88ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪ.
ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﺍﻱ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﺻﻞ 44
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﮔﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﭘﻴﺸﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺵﺑﻴﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ
ﻃﻲ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷﻲ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺩﺳﺖ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺗﻠﺦﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻱ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺳــﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺻﻠﺢ ﻧﺪﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﺍﻱﺩﻫﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻬﺰﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺎﻓــﺖ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺠﻮﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺷــﻨﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻋﺼﺮ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻣﺤﺴــﻦ ﺻﻔﺎﻳﻲﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻼﺗﻜﻠﻴﻔﻲ
ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻛﻤﻲ ﺩﻭﺭﺗﺮ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﻲﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ
ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻠﺦﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧــﺎﻡ ﺩﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﺗــﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ؛ ﻣﺤﺴــﻦ
ﺻﻔﺎﻳﻲﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻲ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﻣﻬﺮﻋﻠﻴﺰﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻬﺮﻋﻠﻴﺰﺍﺩﻩ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ
ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺩﺳــﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻮﺛﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ
ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺤﺴــﻦ ﻣﻬﺮﻋﻠﻴﺰﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﻤﺸــﻬﺮﻱ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺁﺫﺭﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻠﺦ
ﺷﺪ» :ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻮﺛﺮ ﺑﻨﺸــﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓــﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﻨﺪ ،ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻫﻢﻓﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻤﺎﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﻪﺳﺎﻻﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻌﻘﻮﻟﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻭﻟﻰ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺑﻂ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻮﺛﺮ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺧﻂ ﻭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻭ
ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺰﺯ
ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ،ﺗﻔﻜﺮ
ﻏﻠﻂ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻓﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺷــﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ
ﺳﻴﺎﻩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﻴﻢ
ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻮﺛﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﻮﺩﺩﻫﻰ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺭﻭﺑﻪ ﺭﺷﺪﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ«.
ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﺩﻭﻧﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻬﺮﻋﻠﻴﺰﺍﺩﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ» :ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ،
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ،
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ،
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨــﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺨﺘﮕــﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰﺑﺮ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺣﺬﻑ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﻣﺮﺳــﻮﻡ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻮﺳﺖ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻭ
ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺳﻮﺥ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺎﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻨﺸﺎﻧﺪ ،ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﮔﻠﻪ ﻭ ﺷﻜﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺲ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺰﺯ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻳﻚ
ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﺍﺑﻲ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷــﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻳﻨــﺪﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻫــﺎﻱ ﺗــﺎﺯﻩ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﻧﻨــﺪ ،ﺍﻛﻨــﻮﻥ ﺑﻴــﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ
ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧــﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺑــﻪ ﺳــﺒﻚ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ
ﻧﻬــﻢ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﻣــﻲ ﺭﻭﺩ .ﻧﺎﻇــﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧــﻲ
ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻈــﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧــﺪ .ﺁﻧــﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﮕــﻲ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ
22ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩﻣــﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻔﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺒﻚ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺳــﺮﮔﺮﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣــﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮﻱ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﭘــﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺿﻤﺎﻧــﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺗﻠﺨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺪﻝ
ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﭘﻴﺸﮕﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤــﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻲﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ،
ﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨــﺎﻥ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻲ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﺥ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩ.
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺟﺪﺍﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻄﻴﺐ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺘﺤﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ» :ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﮔﻮﺟﻪ ﻓﺮﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻــﻞ 44ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
ﻣﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
»ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ «.ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ،
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷﻰ ﺑﺴﭙﺎﺭﺩ .ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺣﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷﻰ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ،
ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻜﻮﻫﺶ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻃﻰ ﺳﻪ
ﻣﺎﻩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﺨﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺋﻴــﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ
ﺳﺮﺍﻓﻜﻨﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑــﺎ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻜﻮﻫﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﺻﻔﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺑﺎ ﺻﺮﻳﺢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯ 22ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﻰ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ» :ﺁﻧﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ«.
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﺑﺰﻧﺪ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻃﻰ 8ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﺻﺮﻑ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺨﺖ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﮔﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻫﺠﻤﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﺒﺐ
ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻰ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﮔﻮﺷــﻪ ﭼﺸﻤﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﻣﺠﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﻭ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ 700ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﮔﻮﺍﻫﻰ
ﺑﺮ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﺍﺳــﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﭗﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻧﺴﺨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺗﺠﻮﻳﺰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷــﻰ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ» :ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺑﻘﺎﻟﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﻩﺍﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.ﺑﺎ ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺭﺍ ﺟﻠﻮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻳﻢ .ﻃﻲ 15 ،14ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘــﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ
3500ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻭ
ﺑﻲﺿﺎﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﻭ ﻳﻚﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻗﺴﻄﻲ
ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 2600ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ 2300ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ
300ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺰﺍﻧﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
500ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻋﺼﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ
ﺑﻘﺎﻟﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ«.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺿﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ
ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ
ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﻣﺠﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﻣــﻮﺭ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ
ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺗــﺎﺯﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺭﺷــﺪ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﻣﻌﺎﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﺍﻩ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕــﺮﻯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺻﻨﻔــﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﮔــﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ
ﻛﺴــﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ.
65
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻯ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻰ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﺕ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻔﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫــﺎﻯ ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺳــﺎﺯﺩ ﻃــﻰ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺻــﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻧﺤــﺮﺍﻑ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻩ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﺳــﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻳــﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺑﺨــﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧــﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻴﺮﺍﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ
ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻘﺪﺗﺮ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻣﺤﻤــﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫــﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﻛﺸﻴﺪ ،ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺗــﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﺭﺍﻧﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺧﺎﺻــﻰ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺍﺭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ
ﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﻨﺸــﺎ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗــﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪ ،ﻭﻟــﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻳﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺭﺋﻴــﺲ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨــﻪ ﺩﻫــﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫــﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻬــﻢ ﺑــﻪ
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺧــﻼﻑ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻱ ﻣــﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
66
ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺷﻬﺮﺕ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟــﺪﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ» :ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺶ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺗﺎ ﺳﻘﻒ
40ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺳﺴــﺎﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴــﺖ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻧﻴــﺎ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺪﻳﻨﮕﻲ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 15ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﻣﺴــﺎﻝ ﻣﺒﻠﻎ 81/541
ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺭﻳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﻪﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﻠﻎ
190/114ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺭﻳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻥ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷــﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ
ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻟﺬﺍ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﺳﻬﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ
44ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ ،ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﺑﻬﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﺗﺎ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 31ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ،ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ 41/1ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ
ﻭ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ 21ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ،ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ 16ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫــﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ 16/5ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫــﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
4/2ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﻧﻲﻫﺎ 1/2ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﺍﻫــﻰ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺳــﺎﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻫﻤﺴــﺎﺯﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺑﻄــﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠــﻰ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺪﻫﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﻓــﺎﻉ ،ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺷﻔﺎﻫﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺲ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫــﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﻯ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻳﺐﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻟﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻴﺮﺍﻫﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺳﺒﺐ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯﺍﺵ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺧﺒﺎﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺨﺶ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻧﻪ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭼﻨﺪﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﮔﻼﻳﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻼﻳﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺣﺘﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷﺪ«.ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﺸــﺮﻭﺣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ
ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻــﻞ 44ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺷﺎﺧﺺﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻨﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴــﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻯ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨــﺪ ،ﺍﻭﺝ ﺩﻝﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻮﻳﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﺳﺎﺧﺖ» :ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﺎﻡﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ(
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 60ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ :ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ
ﻛــﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻜﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻛــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛــﻪ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ .ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺻــﻞ 44ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣــﺎ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
10ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻰ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ
ﭼﺎﻟﺶﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺍﺳــﺖ«.
ﭘﺸﺖﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺳﺎﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺳﺎﺗﺎ:
ﺩﻟﺒﺴﺘﮕﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﺪﻟﻲ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸـﮕﺎﻩ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﻄﺎﻝ
ﺣﻜـﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺗﻮﺳـﻂ ﻣﺤﻤـﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﭘﺎﻳـﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ.
ﺍﻣـﺎ ﭘﺸـﺖﭘﺮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘـﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧـﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺲﮔﻴـﺮﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷـﺮﻛﺖ ﺳﻬﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺷـﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 30ﻫﻜﺘﺎﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳـﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺮﻭﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻣﻮﻛﻮﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺲ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻜـﻢ ﺍﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻗﺒﻼ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸـﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷـﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ
ﻭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻌﺸـﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺷـﻮﻧﺪ .ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴـﺘﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴـﻠﺢ )ﺳـﺎﺗﺎ( ﻛﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﮔﺴـﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷﻴﻤﻲ ،ﺻﻨﻌﺖ
ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺷﻨﺎﺳـﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﺴـﻨﺪ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺸـﺎﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﺩﻭﺳـﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﻠﻨﻲ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕـﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳـﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼـﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺷﻬﺮﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺑﻪﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﻧﺸـﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻊ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ،ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺟﺴـﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳـﺘﻪ ﺷـﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲﻫﺎ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪﮔﺎﻫﻲﻫﻢﺑﺮﺍﻱﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖﺑﺪﻫﻲﻫﺎﻱﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ ،ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺣﺮﺍﺝ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﭘﺸﺖ ﺩﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴـﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻜﺴـﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸـﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺣﺘﻲ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻋـﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻻﺑﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳـﺎﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ
ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴـﻠﺢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗـﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕـﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺳـﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻱ ﭘﺸـﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸـﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺒﻮﻋﺶ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ.ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭﺍﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻱﻛﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯ 70ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺟﻨﮓﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ
ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﺑﺨﺸـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺴﻨﺪﻳﺪ؟
67
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻨــﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻛﺖ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﺁﻥ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺑﻲﺳــﺮﻭﺻﺪﺍ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻧﺶ ﻗﻠﻤﻲ ﺯﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﻐﻔﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺳﺎﺗﺎ ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ؟ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﭼﻪ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﻭ ...ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ.
ﮔﻮﻳـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺷـﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳـﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺎﺑﺖ ﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﺧﺬ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ .ﺟﺰﺋﻴـﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖﻫﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 30ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺎ
19ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺑﺖ 400ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷﻴﻤﻲ ﺟﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻏﺪﻳﺮ 6ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ
ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ 90ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺎ ﺷــﺶ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨــﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺧﺮﻳﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷﻴﻤﻲ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻻﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ
ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺯﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؟ ﺑﺪﻫﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺗﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﮔﺬﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺳــﺎﺗﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺴﻢ
ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺧﺬ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﻲ
ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻗﻮﻳﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺩﻫﻪ 1360ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ 75ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺧﺎﺹ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻧﺪﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
68
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ 75 .ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺣﺠﻢ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺪﻳﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ
ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺑﺎﻻﺩﺳﺘﻲ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻣﺜﻞ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﺎﺭﻱ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ .ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﺎﺭﻱ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺩﻭ
ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ
ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺴﻮﺕ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﮔﺮﻱ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭼﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻔﺎﺭﻱ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺣﻔﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺩﻟﺮﻳﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺯﻧﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺣﻔﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺸــﻐﻮﻝ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷــﻴﻤﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺳﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﻢ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ
ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻳﻚ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 27ﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸــﺖ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ
ﻣﻨﻌﻘﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺣـﺎﻻ ﭼـﺮﺍ 95ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﻬﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ؟ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻣﺎ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻬﻤﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺳﻬﻢﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻞ ﻃﻠﺒﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ 51ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ 20ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸـﮕﺎﻩ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸـﻜﻼﺕ
ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ؟
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱﻛﻪﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸﺖﻣﺎﻩ
ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﻌﻘﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻨﺪ 6ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻌﻬﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ
ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻲ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﺼﺮﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ
ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ» :ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 4ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ «.ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺎ
ﺣﻖ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ.
ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻭ ﺻﺪﺍ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ
ﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷﻴﻤﻲ ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻳﺪ؟ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺎﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﻗـﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺻﺒﺮ ﻛﻨﻴـﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳـﻖ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺑﺒﺮﻳﺪ؟
ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﻣﺎﻟﻜﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ،ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨــﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ،
ﭘﺲ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻮﺍﺳــﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 8ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ
ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ :ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ )ﻃﺒﻖ ﺑﻨﺪ» «7ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ
ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ( ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻛﻞ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ )ﻣﻨﺪﺭﺝ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 5ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ( ﺑﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ
ﻓﻴﻤﺎﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳــﻬﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻤﻨﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛــﺲ ﺟﻠﻮ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮ ﻣﻲﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﻭ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭘﺎ ﭘﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻖ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺴﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺻﺎﻑ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻳﻢ.
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴـﺖ ﻭ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺎﻻ ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺗﻤﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴــﻢ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭘﺲ
ﮔﺮﻓــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴــﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﻭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺳــﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺻــﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧــﻲ .ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻــﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﻥ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﻳﻢ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺷــﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷــﻴﻤﻲ ﺧﻠﻴﺞﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺻﻨﻌﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞﺳﺎﺯ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷــﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻲ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﻫﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺳــﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﮔﺮ 5ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﭘﺲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 7ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺣﻖ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺳﻠﺐ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻗﻂ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺩﻳﻮﻥ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ
ﻛﻞ ﺳﻬﺎﻡﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪﺍﺵ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻪ ﺗﻴﻎ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻲﺍﺵ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﺸــﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﺎﺩﮔﻲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﺮﻳﻢ ،ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ،
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭽﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ؟ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺟﻨﺠــﺎﻝ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫــﺎ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﺪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺑﻄﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﻛــﻪ ﺣﺮﻓﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺑﻪﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺑﻜﺸﺎﻧﻨﺪ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺒﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﭼﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﺖ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﭘﻮﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻲ ﻧﮕﻴﺮ .ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻠﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺳــﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻓــﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﻃﻌﻢ ﺣﻘﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﭼﺸﻴﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻓﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﻃﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ
ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪﺭﺣﻤﺖ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻳﺸــﺎﻥ
ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﻱﺑﮕﻴﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻴﺪ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻛﻬﻮﻟﺖ ﺳﻦ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻒ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﻇﻔﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ،
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺘﻴﻔﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺷﺎﻏﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻏﻼﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﮔـﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌـﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﮕـﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳـﺖ ﻏﻴﺮﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸـﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿـﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧـﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻧﻈﺎﻡﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺍﺟﺮﺍﺷﻮﺩ.ﺩﻟﺒﺴﺘﮕﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﻋﻼﻳﻖ ﻗﻠﺒﻲ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ 70ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﭽﺮﺑﺪ؟ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻭ ﺑﻲﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮﻱ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺯﻳﺮﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲﻋﻤﻞﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ.ﺩﺭﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷﻴﻤﻲ،
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳــﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺺﺣﺎﺿﺮﺩﺭﺁﻥﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﻛﻨﻴﻢ.ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥﺑﺨﺶﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﻛﻪﻣﺎﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﺭﺍﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩﻛﻨﻴﻢ.ﺍﻳﻦﺍﺩﻋﺎ،ﻭﺍﻫﻲ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﻗﺎﻧﻊﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢﺷﻤﺎﺳﺮﺟﺎﻳﺘﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪﺑﻮﺩ.ﺑﻪﺁﻧﻬﺎﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ،
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻭﺯﻱﺩﺭﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻣﺪﻳﺮﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻫﻢﻣﺪﻳﺮﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪﻭﻫﻢﻣﺎﻟﻚ.
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ 5ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻬﺎﻡﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﺑﻮﺩﻭﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪﺑﻪﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻛﻢ
ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ،ﺍﻳﻦ 5ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺍﺭﺯﺵﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱﺩﺍﺷﺖ.ﺣﺎﻝﻛﻪﺍﻳﻦﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﺍﺑﻄﺎﻝ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺽﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﺪﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥﺩﺭﺑﺨﺶﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲﺩﺭﺍﺯﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.ﺍﻣﺎﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻡﺩﺭﭘﺸﺖﭘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪﻛﻪﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﻣﺮﻛﺰﭼﺸﻢﺩﻭﺧﺘﻪﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
69
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ:
ﺷﻴﺐ ﺻﻌﻮﺩﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﮔــﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﻭﻳــﮋﻩ ﺍﺻــﻞ 44ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻭﻧــﺪ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﻼﻏــﻲ ﺍﺻﻞ 44
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺁﺋﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺻــﻞ 44ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ،ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ
ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫﺎ،
ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺨــﺶ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺷﻬﺮﺕ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺴــﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ
10ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ 5ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ
ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﻧﻰ ﻭ 5ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﮔﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻫــﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 500ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ
5ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﺻﻞ 44
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺎﻣﻊﺗﺮ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻭﻗﻔﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻡ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﺳــﺘﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﻭ 80ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ 20ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺗﺎ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺗﺤﻮﻟﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ،
ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺰﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨــﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﺘﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺳــﺮﻳﻌﺘﺮ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ.
70
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﻧﺎﻳﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥﮔﺬﺍﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻛﻤﻲﺻﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ .ﺧــﻮﺍﻩ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺠﻤﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭘﺸــﺖ ﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺍﺭﺯﺷــﻤﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﻃﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺣﺘــﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ،ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﻴــﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺣﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﻜﺎﻧﻲ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺗﻌﺎﻭﻥ ،ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺑﻮﺭﺱ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ،ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻱ
ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮﺣﻔــﻆ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ،ﺟﻠﺐ ﻭ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻭ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﭘﺲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ
ﻧﻮﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ،ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺭ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺘﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺩﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﻲﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﺪﻳﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻭﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ،
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺖﺍﻧﺪﺭﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻋﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ
ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﻼﻏﻴﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺁ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞﻫﺎ
ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻡ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑــﻮﺭﺱ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻲ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺮﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ،
ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻘﺎﺩﻳﺮ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺑﻬﻲ ﺍﺭﺯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺰﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪ
ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻜﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ.
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻳﺎ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻓﺘﺤﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻨـﺪ »ﺝ« ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴـﺪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻳـﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﮔﺴـﺘﺮﺵ
ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﺯ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷـﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﻢ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﻲ
ﻭ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨـﺪ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﺭﺍﺋـﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﺑـﻪ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ،
ﻋﺪﻡ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪﻱ ﺑـﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﺒﻨﺪﻱ ،ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﺳـﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺸـﺎﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ،ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺳـﺒﺐ
ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻱ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷـﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻕ ﺑﻬﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻲ ﺁﻥ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻨﺪ »ﺝ« ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺍﺻــﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻨــﺪ »ﺍﻟﻒ« ﺑﻪ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﻨﺪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻨﺪ »ﺝ« ﺍﺻﻞ 44
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺗﻼﺷﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭ 5ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺑﻨﺪ »ﺝ« ﺍﺻﻞ
44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ
ﭼﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ .ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ،ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ
ﻧﻘــﺎﻁ ﺿﻌــﻒ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺁﻣــﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻼﻙﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷﻴﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ
ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻳﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺰﺭگ ﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﭼﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷــﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﭘﺘﺮﻭﺷﻴﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﺮﺩﺧﺮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻦ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻫﻠﺪﻳﻨﮓﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ
ﻣﺎﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺭﺥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﺧﺎﻟــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ
ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﺷﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ،
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻮﺩﻫﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺗﺠﻤﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻠﻪﻛﺎﻡ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﭼﻪ ﺭﺑﻄﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻧﻴـﺰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻳﻚ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻳـﺎ ﻭﺍﮔـﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻣـﻮﺭ ﺑـﻪ ﺑﺨـﺶ ﺷـﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺴـﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﻮﺡ ﺑﺎﻻ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺘﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻟﺬﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻣﻞ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺷﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻟﺰﻭﻣﺎ
ﻋﻘﻞ ﻛﻞ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ
ﺷــﺒﻪﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﻔﺎﻑ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺷــﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺑﺮ
ﺳــﺮ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﺠﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑــﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﻨﺠﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﻨﺎ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﺍﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺣﺘﻢ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗﻲ ﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ .ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺟﺪﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ.
71
ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻃﻬﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﺭﺧﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻮﭼﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻃﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻨﺪ »ﺝ« ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﺭﺯﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﻭ
ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻃﻬﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻄﺮﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ
ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻨﺪ »ﺝ« ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎ ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ؟
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺑﺴــﺘﺮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻠﻲ
ﻛــﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻋــﺚ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺘﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷــﻮﺩ.
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﺳﺎﺯﻭﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﻧﮓﻭﺑﻮ ﻭ ﻣﻼﻙﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ
ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﻏﻠﻂ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺿﺮﺏﺍﻟﻤﺜﻠﻲ »ﻫﻢ ﭼﻮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﻮﺭﻧﺪ ﻭﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﺎﺯ«.
ﻇﺎﻫـﺮﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘـﺎﻝ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑـﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺟﺪﻱ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠــﻲ ﺁﻧﭽــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻫﻤﻴــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳــﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺸــﺖ .ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲﻛــﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﺮ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ
72
ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ
ﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﺪﻣﺘﮕﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺘﮕﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑــﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻــﻲ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺘﺪ ﺁﻥﻭﻗــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺣﺬﻑ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻳﺪ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭﺳﺎﺯ ﻭﻛﺎﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ
ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﻧﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻘﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ،ﭘﻮﻝ ﺧﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ،
ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ
ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ،ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻣﻬﺮ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ،ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻘﺪﻱ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺴﻜﻨﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻣﻬﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 200ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﺎ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ 70ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ
ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻢﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻲﺷــﻚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﻼﻏﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﻼﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻨﺸﺎ
ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻨﻮﻁ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﺮﻭﻁ ﺑﺮﺁﻧﻜﻪ
ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻌﻨــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺯﻭﺍﻳــﺎ ﻭ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ
ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺧﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻱ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺷﮕﺮﻓﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻀﻼﺕ
ﭘﻴﺶﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ
ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻥ ﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺸﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﺤﺮﻙ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ ﺍﺛﺮﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ
ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺑﻼﻏﻴﻪ ،ﻫﺪﻑﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﻭ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖﺳﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﻃﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑــﻪ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﺒﺐ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺛﻤــﺮﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﺭ ﺧﻢ
ﻳﻚ ﻛﻮﭼﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ.
www.mosalas.ir
ª¹ÀoÎ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎپ ﻭ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻮﺷــﻪ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ
ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﺍﻋﻴﺎﺩ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭﻧﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﭘﺎپ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ؟
73
1
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻱﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎپ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﭘﺎپ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ
ﺳﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻰ
»ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻏﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻫﺮﺟﺎ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯﺷﺎﻥ
ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ،ﻫﺮ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺩﺭﺩﻧﺎﻙ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻏﺎﻳﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ
ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧــﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻰ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻧﻮﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺧــﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻃﻨﻴﻦﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻩ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﺎﻻﺭ ﻋﻘﻴﻠﻰ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻨﺞﺷــﻨﺒﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺗــﺎﻻﺭ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟــﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﺩﻳــﻦ ﺧﻠﻌﺘﺒــﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧــﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻟﻦ
ﻫﻤﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﺝ ﻣﻴﻼﺩ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
74
ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﻳﺦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ
ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻰ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ »ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻟﻄﻔﻰ« ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﺷﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﻜﺎﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻥ »ﻟﻄﻔﻰ« ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﺴﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺗﺎﺳﻒﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ،ﺳﻜﻮﺕ
ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ
ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎپ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺗﻮﺍﻥﺗــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟــﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻧﻘــﺪﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨــﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﺷــﻪ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﺷــﻬﺮ ﭘــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻃﻨﻴﻦ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ
ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ،
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﻭﺣﻰ ﺗــﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﻓﻰ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺟﻨﺐ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺴﻰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﻨﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺻﺎﻑ
ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻨﺘﻰﻫﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ
ﭘﺎپ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ ﮔﻮﺷــﻪ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍ
ﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴــﺮ ،ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻝﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﭘﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ
ﭘﺎپ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻴﺪﺍﻧﺎﻥ
ﭘﺎپ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ.
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ
»ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎ« ﺍﮔــﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
»ﻛﺮﻳﺲ ﺩﻯﺑــﺮگ« ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟــﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺭﻭﻧﻘــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﻣﺪﺍﺩ 28ﻭ 29ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ﻣــﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺰﻳﺮﻩ ﻛﻴﺶ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺟــﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﺗﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺁﺫﺭﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺳﻪﺷــﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺯﻧــﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺯ 12ﺗﺎ 14ﺁﺫﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻪ ﺷﺐ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﺍﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺕ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ 20ﺗﺎ 40ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﭘﺮﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻛﺮﻳﺲ ﺩﻯﺑﺮگ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ
ﺧﻮﺵ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ
ﭘﺎپ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻧﻮﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭘﺎپ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻛﻴﺪﻩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ،ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎپ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻓﺮﻗﻰ ﻫــﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﺍﻥ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ .ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﺭﻛﻴﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﭼﻨــﺪﻯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﻻﺭ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺸــﻦ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺩﺍﺩ،
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟــﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﺍﺯ
ﻫﺠﺪﻫﻢ ﺗﺎ 20ﺁﺫﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻻﺭ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻻﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺘﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ،ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﻴﻢ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺳــﺎﻟﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
»ﺍﺭﻛﻴــﺪﻩ« ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮﺍﻧﺶ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭘﺎپ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﺍﻥ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺷﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﺪ» ،ﺍﺭﻛﻴﺪﻩ« ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﺎﻳﻰ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﭼﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺏ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪﺍﻣﻴﺮﻯ
ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪﺍﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻓﻠﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ
ﻋﻘــﺐ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟــﻰ ﻛﻪ 30ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺁﺫﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻟﻦ
ﻫﻤﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﺝ ﻣﻴــﻼﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺸــﺘﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺳــﺎﻟﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺮﺝ ﻣﻴﻼﺩ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺳــﺎﻟﻦ ﻣﻴﻼﺩ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﺳﺮﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻓﺮﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﺍﻣﺴــﺎﻝ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﭘﺎپ ،ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ
ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪﺍﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ،
ﺍﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻨﺪﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﭘﺴﺮ »ﺍﻳﺮﺝ«
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﭘﺎپ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﻳﺾ ﻭ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ» .ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪﺍﻣﻴﺮﻯ« ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺗﻴﺘﺮﺍژ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺷﺐﻫﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻬﻨﺎﻡ ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻰ
»ﺑﻬﻨﺎﻡ ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻰ« ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻴﺮ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﻣﺴــﺎﻝ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ 28ﻭ 29ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ .ﺿﻤﻦ
ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕ ،ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ »ﺳﺎﻝ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ
ﻗﻄﻌﺎﺕ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺭﻭﻧﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻗﻄﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺗﻰ ﺑﻰﻛﻼﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻳﺶ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﻛﺴﺘﺮ
ﺳﻤﻔﻮﻧﻴﻚ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ 12ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻧﺎﻣﮕﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺗﻰ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ
ﻭ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺒﺾ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ
ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺶ ﻭ ﻫﺸــﺘﻰ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ.
ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮﻛﻼﻡ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻳﻦ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺗﺎ ﻛﻨﻮﻥ ،ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺧﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎﺷــﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺍﺳــﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻖ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻧﻪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﻯ »ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ ﺟﻮﺍﻫﺮﻛﻼﻡ« ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ »ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭﻧﻴﺎﺭ« ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 19ﺁﺫﺭﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﺍﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﺵ
ﻳﻚ ﺷــﺐ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﻯ ﺍﺛﺮ »ﺗﻮ ﻣﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ،ﻣﻦ
ﻣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮ« ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﺳﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺸﻴﺪ ﻛﻼﻩﺩﻭﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺳﺘﻪ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻮﺵ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪﻧﻮﺭﻯ
ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪﻧﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻫــﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻢﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﺸــﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻓﻠﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻧــﺪﻩ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ
ﻭ ﺷﺸــﻢ ﺁﺫﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﻻﺭ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ .ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪﺍﻣﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ »ﺫﻭﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮﻥ« ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ.
ﺭﺿﺎ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻰ
»ﺻﺎﺩﻗــﻰ« ﺣــﺎﻻ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪﺷــﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫــﺎﻯ
ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﭘﺮ ﭘﻴﭻﻭﺧﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟــﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻛــﺲ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮﻯ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺣﺘــﻰ ﺍﮔــﺮ ﻛﻠﻴﭗﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺩ
ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﭘــﺮ ﻭ ﭘﺎ ﻗﺮﺻﺶ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﭻﻭﺧﻢﻫــﺎﻯ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣﺴــﺎﻝ ،ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﺮﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ
ﻳﻜﻰ ،ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻬﻨﺎﻡ ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ
ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﺝﻣﻴﻼﺩ .ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﻍ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻬﺮﺍﺳﺒﻰ
ﻫﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻍ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺭﺍ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺴــﺎﻝ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻰﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻬﺮﺍﺳــﺒﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
»ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﻋﺴــﮕﺮﻯ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺎﺋﻢﺷﻬﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
ﻓﺮﺯﺍﺩ ﻓﺮﺯﻳﻦ ،ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﺳــﺮﺍﻳﻰ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺳﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺟﺰﻳﺮﻩ ﻛﻴﺶ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ
ﭘﺎپ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣــﻪ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ
ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺳــﻜﻮﺗﻰ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﺒﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﺵ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ .ﺁﺩﻣﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
75
2
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻱﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ:
ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ ﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻳﻢ
» «team workﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ،ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻓﺮﻗﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺷـﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺳـﺘﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺟﻤﻊﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﻴﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﺸـﻜﻼﺕ ﻳﻜﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻰﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.
»ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ« ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﺵ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ .ﻳﻚ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ
ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺍﺵ ،ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﻰ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ.
ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻃﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﺎﻳﻰ – ﭼﻪ ﭘﺎپ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ – ﺭﺥ
ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﻣﮕﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﭼـﻮﻥ »ﻛﺎﻣﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎ«
ﻛـﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳـﺪ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﮔﻰﺷـﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺳـﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻧﺶ ﺟﺰ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺝﭘـﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ،
ﻧﻤﻰﺷـﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺭﻣﺰ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ
ﻣﺪﺕ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺷــﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻚﺳﺮﻯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺳــﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ »ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ« ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ
76
ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻣــﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﮔﻰ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﻓﻰ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﺶ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ» :ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ« ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺷﻴﺪﻩ
ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﺴﺖ
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﺷﺪﻳﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻯ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺷﻌﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻓﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺷﺪ.
ﮔـﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺼـﻮﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻰﻫـﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻃﻼﻳﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﭼﻘﺪﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ؟
ﻋﻠﻲ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﺑﻪﺷــﻜﻞ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ »ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﻰ« ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﺰﻳﺮﻩ ﻗﺸﻢ
ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ »ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺟﺐﭘﻮﺭ« ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻳﺪ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﻗﻮﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭ+ﺩ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺟﻪ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻦ ﭘﻮﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ،
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺭﻗﻢ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑــﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻘــﺶ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ
ﻛﻨﻴــﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻭﻝ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭ ﻟﻴﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻖ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻤﻚﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻣﺎ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻂ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ
ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﺩﻟﮕﺮﻣﻰﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺗﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪ.
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ 11ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ 11ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺣﺘﻰ ﻫﺮ
ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺣﻞ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻃﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﻗﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ.
ﭘﻴـﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﻰ :ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺸﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﮔـﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻨﻒ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺧﺎﺹ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰﺷﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻰ »ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﮔﻠﺰﺍﺭ« ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻍ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﺭﻓﺖ .ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﺎ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻻﺍﻗﻞ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺟﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ
ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ.
ﻧﻴﻨﻒ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺧﺎﺹ ﻋﻀـﻮ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺷـﺪﻥ
ﺍﻭ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻳﺪ؟ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳـﺖ »ﺷـﻬﺎﺏ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻰ« ﻛﻪ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺍﻭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﻋﻠـﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ» :ﻧﻴﻨــﻒ« ﻭﺯﻧﻪ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻭ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ
ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻼﺷﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺧﺪﺷﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺷﻬﺎﺏ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻰ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﺳــﻪ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻬﻤــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗــﻊ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎ »ﻧﻴﻨﻒ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺧﺎﺹ«
ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷﻤﺮﻯ :ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ »ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ« ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻼء ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
»ﻧﻴﻨﻒ« ﺭﺍ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠـﻮﺍﻥ :ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻭ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻣــﻦ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺮ ﺷﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ
ﻣﻮﺯﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ
ﻗﻄﻌﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﻡ .ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻧﻴﻨﻒ ﺷﻮﻙ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺯﻣﺰﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺷﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻧﻴﻨﻒ ﭘﺨﺶ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﻨﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻓﻴﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﺵ ﻫﻢ »ﺷﺎﺩﻣﻬﺮ ﻋﻘﻴﻠﻰ« ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﺗﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻻﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻼﻩ ﻣﺨﻤﻠﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺑﺎﺝ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺳﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷﻤﺮﻯ :ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺋﺪ ﻭ
ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﺣﺘﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺝ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻧﺸــﺪﻳﻢ،
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺯﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻭ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﻰ
ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻣﺜﻼ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺗﻰ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﻳﻚ
ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺳﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷﻤﺮﻯ :ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻧﺎﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ،
ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺳـﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷﻤﺮﻯ :ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﻳﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺯﻥ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠـﻮﺍﻥ :ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺑــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺣﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﺁﻥ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﻰ.
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﻬـﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑـﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ؟
ﺳﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷﻤﺮﻯ :ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ .ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﻛﺴﺘﺮ ﺳﻤﻔﻮﻧﻴﻚ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﺍﻥ
ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻳﺎ ﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ،
ﻣﺜﻼ »ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻰ« ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻤﺎژ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ
ﻳﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﺘﻌﺪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﻭﻟﺸﺎﻥ »ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ« ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﺶ »ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺟﺐﭘﻮﺭ« ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﭼﻪ ﺑـﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳـﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﻳﻜـﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺵﺍﻗﺒﺎﻟﻰﻫﺎﻯ
»ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ« ﺑﻬﺮﻩﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ» ،ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻧﻰ« ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻭ ﺳــﭙﺮ ﺑﻼﻯ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷﻤﺮﻯ :ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗــﺎﻯ ﺭﺟﺐﭘﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻋﻀــﻮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ
ﻣﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺣﺎﻻ ﻛﻪ 10ﺳـﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺩ ،ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪ ﭼﻴﺴـﺖ؟ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﻘﻰ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺗﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﻰ :ﺍﺑﺘــﺪﺍﻯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ،ﺁﺩﻡ ﺁﻣــﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑــﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻔــﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ 4-5ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ
ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ
»ﻛﺮﻳﺲ ﺩﻯﺑﺮگ« ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﻳﻮﻡ ﺳﺮﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺴــﻨﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻓﻨﻰﺍﺵ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻡ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻰﺩﻯﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ،
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﭘــﺎپ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ 10 :ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻢ.
ﺳﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷﻤﺮﻯ :ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻓﻴﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ
ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﺵ ﻫﻢ »ﺷﺎﺩﻣﻬﺮ ﻋﻘﻴﻠﻰ« ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ
ﺷﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ
ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ .ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﻪﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ
ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺷــﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺟﻠﻮ
ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ .ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻤﻴﺰﻯ ﻭ ...ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻮﻗﻒﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠـﻮﺍﻥ :ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻌﻮﻳﺾ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﻭ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷــﻮﺩ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺳﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷﻤﺮﻯ :ﺍﺻﻼ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ
ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻋﻮﺍﻣــﻞ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ،ﺳــﺎﻟﻦ ﻭ ...ﻣﺎﻧﻊ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻟﻐﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺧﺴﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺑﺎﺑﺖ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ
ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ 200ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﺷـﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﺵ ﻧﺸـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺗﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
10ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻟﻐﻮ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﺮﻕ
ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫــﻢ ﻣﺘﻌﺠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻓﺎﻥ
ﻻﺍﻗﻞ ﻧﻴﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻳﻚﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻓﺴــﺦ ﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺧﺴــﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ .ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺩﻩﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺳﺎﻟﻨﻰ
ﻛــﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟــﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﺁﺗﻰﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻣــﻜﺎﻥ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﻫﻢ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭﺣﺸﺘﻨﺎﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﺎﻟﻨﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﻳﺮﺗﺮ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﺭﭼﻪ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮ ﺳــﻌﺪﺁﺑﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻮﺏ ﺯﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺳﺎﻟﻦ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ ﭼﻴﺪﻳﻢ .ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻤﺎﻥ .ﺟﺎﻟﺐ
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭘﺎپ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻓﺮﻭﺵﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 700ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﺴﻰ
ﺭﻛﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺰﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷﻤﺮﻯ :ﻛﺴﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﻛﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﭙﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺧﺮﺩ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭘﺎﭘﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻯ
ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺷــﺪﻳﻢ ،ﺿﻤــﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻴﺪﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﭘﺎپ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻠﻴﺖﻓﺮﻭﺷــﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ
ﺩﺑﻰ ،ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ،ﻣﻨﭽﺴﺘﺮ ،ﻛﻠﻦ ،ﻫﺎﻣﺒﻮﺭگ ،ﺑﺮﻟﻴﻦ ،ﻣﻮﻧﻴﺦ ،ﻭﻧﻜﻮﻭﺭ،
ﺍﺳــﺘﻜﻬﻠﻢ ﻭ ....ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺳـﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷـﻤﺮﻯ :ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣــﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﻣﺎ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﮔــﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴــﭻ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺰ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ
ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻨﺴـﺮﺕ ،ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺷـﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺳﻰﺩﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺛﺮ
ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﺍﻗﻌـﺎ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴـﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺎ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺧﺮﺍﺏ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻪ .ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻣﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺯﻭﻥ ﻭ ...ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻯ
77
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻨﻒ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻛﺮﻳﺲ ﺩﻯﺑﺮگ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ،
ﻣــﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﻣﺎﻳــﻜﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻡ ،ﺿﻤــﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ
ﻣﺎﻳﻜﻞ ﺟﻜﺴــﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮔﺶ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﺸــﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﻛﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻚ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ
ﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕ ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﺮ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ
ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻠﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ،ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺟﺮﺍﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦﺣــﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻣــﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕ ﺁﺫﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭ – ﺳــﻪ ﺷﻮﻙ
ﻣﻮﺯﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﮔـﺮ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳﻢ ،ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻰﺷـﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ »ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ«
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳـﻚ ﻟﺒﻪ ﺧﻄﻰ ﺣﺮﻛـﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻋﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻛـﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺧﺎﺹﺗﺮ ﺭﺍ.
ﺁﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻮﭼﻪ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻛﺸـﻴﺪﻩ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻯ ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺳﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷﻤﺮﻯ :ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺳــﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﻭﻯ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎ ﺳــﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻗﻮﻟﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻬﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻤﺘﻨﻊ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻰ
ﻣﻮﺯﻳﻚ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻮﻳﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺵ ﺩﺍﺩ،
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺟﻴﭙﺴﻰ ﻛﻴﻨﮓ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻴﭗﻫﺎپ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﻟﻴﻜﺎ ﻻﺗﻴﻦ.
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻴـﭻ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻖﻫـﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻳﺎ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺳـﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷـﻤﺮﻯ :ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺶ ﻛﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﻣﺎ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﮔﺮﻳﺰ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﻣﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺮﻳﺲ ﺩﻯﺑﺮگ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ،
ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻳﻮﻟﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺶ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻔﻆ
ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﺎﺹ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﻳﺲ ﺩﻯﺑـﺮگ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺸـﺪ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﺷﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻓﺖ ،ﻧﻜﺮﺩ.
ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﻰ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺮﻯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ
ﻛﻼﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻝ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻚ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺴــﺘﺮ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺭﻭﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻳﻚ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ
ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺳــﺘﺮﺱ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺍﻳﺠــﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻪﺳــﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘــﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻛﻠﻴﭗ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﺰﻳﻨﺲ
ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻰ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﻓﺮﻕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻠﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺠﻮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻌﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ...
ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝﻭﻧﻴﻢ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ؛ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻭ 3-4ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ
ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﺎ
78
ﻗﺒﻼ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﻗﺒﻼ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﺯﻳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﮔﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻴﺪﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱﺷــﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻟﻨﮓ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺳـﺎﻧﺎﺯ :ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻫﺮ
ﺍﺗﻔــﺎﻕ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺩ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻭ
ﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺿﺒﻂ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻳﺲ ﺩﻯﺑﺮگ
ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺷﻜﻞ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ،
ﺑﺎ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ
ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺁﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻮﺗﻴﻮﺏ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺴﻰ
ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﻧﺘﺎژ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ »ﻧﺎﺻﺮﻳﺎ« ﺍﺯ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ 50ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺖ.
ﺳﺎﻧﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺷـﻤﺮﻯ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﻣﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﻲ :ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﻫﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻣﺶ ﭘﺮﻓﺮﻭﺵ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻭﻳﺪﺋﻮﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺳﭙﺲ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺗﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺗﺶ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﺑﺼﺮﻱ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻗﻄﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﻩﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧــﺲ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ ﻭﻳﺪﺋﻮ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺸـﺘﺮﻛﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺮﻳﺲ ﺩﻯﺑﺮگ ﭼﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ؟
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕ ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒﺮ ﭘﺎﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻛﺮﻳــﺲ ﺩﻯﺑﺮگ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔــﺎﻕ ﺭﺥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ .ﺍﻭ
ﺍﻛﺘﺒﺮ 2009ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃــﺮ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺶ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﻲ :ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘــﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ 30ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻳــﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻳــﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻤــﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ
ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺷﺶ ﺷﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﺳﺎﺯ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻳﻢ.
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﭼﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺑـﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻓﻖ ﺗﻴﺮﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﭘﺎپ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﺼﻮﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﻣﻦ ﺭﻧﮕﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻮﻳﻢ .ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ؟ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺘﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﻟﺤـﻰ :ﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺏ ﻭ ﮔﻞ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻳــﻢ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻫﺮ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﺟﺎ ﻣﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺨﺘﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﻴﺖ ،ﺷﻬﺮﺕ ،ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ،ﭘﻮﻝ ﻭ ...ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺷﻐﻞ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺟﺰ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﻼﺷﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻴﻢ ،ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﺑﻰ ﺑﺮﺳــﺪ ،ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻯ ،ﺳﻴﻼﺏ ﻫﻢ
ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ.
ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ؟
ﻋﻠـﻰ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ :ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻯ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﻟﻴﺎ ،ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﻭ...
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻟﺲﺁﻧﺠﻠﺴﻰ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪ ﻋﺎﺩﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ – ﺩﻭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﭘــﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻟﭗﺗﺎپ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ.
2
3
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻱﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻬﺪﻛﻮﺩﻙ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺘﻠﺰ!
ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺷﺎﻥ
ﺧﺎﻛﺴﺘﺮﻱ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻨﺒﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ 2-3ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ
)ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨــﺪﻩ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲﻫــﺎ Frontmanﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ(
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻢ ،ﻻﺑﻪﻻﻱ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ
ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻟﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﺴــﻮﺯﺩ! ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﺳــﻮﺯﺩﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﺮﻑ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻬﺘﺎﻥ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ.
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﭘﺴــﻨﺪﻧﺪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﻨــﻲ! ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺪ.ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻭﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﻣــﺎﻥ )ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲﻣﺎﻥ( ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺟﻠﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ» ،ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ« ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ
ﺳــﻮژﻩ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺴﺨﺮ ﻭ ﺧﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ! ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻭﻱ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﭼﻘﺪﺭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻣﺂﺑﺎﻧﻪ؟! ﭼﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺣﺴﺎﺩﺕ؟! ﺍﺻﻼ ﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ
ﻫﻴﭽﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺨﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ! ﺧﺐ ،ﺗﻤﺴﺨﺮ ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ؟!
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻐﺮﺿﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻧﺪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؛ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ،ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ،ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ.ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳــﺖ
ژﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺭﺍﻛﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﻼﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﺿﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ،
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺳﻮﭘﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍ ﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﺏ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻨﺪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻣﺂﺑﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﺷﻮﺑﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺘﻠﺰ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺣﻘﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ؟! ﺍﻣﺎ ﻗﺼﺪﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ
ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺩﻫــﻪ 60ﻭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﻣﻴــﻼﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈــﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﺯﺩﻩ ،ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺿﺪﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻫﻴﭙﻲﻫــﺎ ،ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ
ﻭ ...ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺷــﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﺄﺱ ﻭ
ﻧﻮﻣﻴﺪﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻓﻜﻨﺪﻩ .ﺑﻴﺘﻠﺰ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﺘﻠﺰ ﺷﺪ .ﻟﻨﻮﻥ
ﻭ ﻣﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﺩﺳﺘﻪﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺷﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺷﺎﻧﻪ،
ﺑــﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ »ﺧﻮﺷــﺤﺎﻝ«! ﻭ ﺻﻠﺢﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧــﻪ ،ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ )ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ
ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﻫﺎ( ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳــﺮ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻴﺘﻠــﺰ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ »ﺍﻣﻴﺪ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﺍﻩ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺑﻴﺘﻠــﺰ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻟﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌــﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﺰﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﻫــﻢ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﻴــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻟﻨﻮﻥ ﻭ
ﺭﻓﻘﺎﻳــﺶ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏــﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳــﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﻨﻚﻓﻠﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮔﻴﻠﻤﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺗﺮﺯ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺑﻴﺘﻠﺰ ﺑﺮ ﭘﻴﻨﻚﻓﻠﻮﻳﺪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﻳﻮﻳﺪ ﮔﻴﻠﻤﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥ ﺟﺎﻥ ﻟﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻦﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﮔﻴﻠﻤﻮﺭ
ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻗﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺍﻭ
ﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ )ﻳﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ(
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ )ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ(
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻚ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻟﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻭﺍﺳــﻮﺧﺖ ﻟﻌﻦ ﻭ ﻧﻔﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺸــﻮﻕ ،ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﺑﺨﺶﺗﺮ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺎﺑﻚ ﺭﻳﺎﺣﻲﭘﻮﺭ )ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻴﺲ ﻭ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯ( ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺠﺎﻱ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﭘﺎپ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲ
ﻧﻤﻲﺳــﻨﺠﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺟــﺰ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻠﻮﺯ ﻳﺎ
ﻓﻼﻣﻨﻜﻮ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺤﺚ ﻓﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﭘﺎپ ﺍﺳﻢﺍﺵ
ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﭘﻴﻮﻻﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭘﺴﻨﺪﻳﺪﻩ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺭﻭﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭘﺎپ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﻲﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲﮔﺮﻭﻩﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥﻫﺰﺍﺭﺑﺎﺭﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ »ﻣﻬﺪ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﻲ« ﺍﺳﺖ! ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺳﺎﺯﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻠﻮﺩﻱﻫﺎ ،ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ...ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺭﺍ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻡ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻨﻢ ﺭژﻩ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺁﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ »ﻣﻬﺪ
ﻛﻮﺩﻛﻲ«ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺁﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﺑﻴﺘﻠﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺑﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ؟! ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ،
ﻛﺪﺍﻡﻳﻚﺍﺯﺁﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥﺍﺯﺁﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻳﻲﻧﻈﻴﺮ »،«LoveMe do
» «Please,Please me» ،«She Loves youﻭ ...ﮔــﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﻴﺘﻠﺰ
»ﻣﻬﺪﻛﻮﺩﻛﻲﺗﺮ«ﺍﺳﺖ؟!
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ :ﺑﻴﺘﻠﺰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛــﺮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺭﻓﺘﻦ
ﺳــﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ -ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﺩﻫــﻪ ،70ﻛﻢﻛــﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻀــﺎﻱ »ﺗﻴﻦﺍﻳﺠــﺮﻱ« )ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺎ
ﺗﺮﺱ ﻭﻟﺮﺯ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻢ ،ﭼــﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﺘﻠــﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ،ﻛﻠــﻲ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ
ﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻦ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃــﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘــﻂ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ
ﺗﻴﻦﺍﻳﺠﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ(! ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﻟﻴﺮﻳﻚﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﻓﺮﻡ ﻣﻠﻮﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺸــﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳــﻦ ﺁﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻥ ﻟﻨﻮﻥ ﻧﻈﻴــﺮ »،«God» ،«Imagine
» « WorkingClass Heroﻭ ....ﺣﺎﺻــﻞ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ
ﺩﻫــﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺳــﻦ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻧﺶ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻠﻲ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ
ﺍﺧﻴﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺷﺎﻥ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳــﻴﻨﮕﻞ ﺁﺧﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ« )ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻏﺬﺍﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ( ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻦﺧﻠﻌﺘﺒﺮﻱ)ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴﺎﺯ(ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﺍﺳﺖﻫﻨﺮﻣﺎﻫﺮﭼﻪﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪﺍﺯ
ﺣﺬﻑﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮﻭﻧﻔﻲﮔﺬﺷﺘﮕﺎﻥﺍﺳﺖ.ﺍﻭﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪﺍﺯﻗﺮﻥﻫﺎﭘﻴﺶﺗﺎﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﺩﺭﻫﻨﺮﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ)ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ،ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ،ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ،ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲﻭ(...ﺍﻳﻦﺭﺳﻢﺑﻮﺩﻩﻛﻪ
ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻲﺁﻣﺪﻩﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﻴﺎﻥﺧﻮﺩﺵﺭﺍﻧﻔﻲﻛﺮﺩﻩﻭﮔﻔﺘﻪﻣﻦﺧﻮﺑﻢﻭﻗﺒﻞﺍﺯ
ﻣﻦ ﻫﺮﻛﺲ ﻫﺮﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﺭﺩﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ!
ﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﺏ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻚ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﭘﺎپ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺭﺍﻙ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺭپ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺟﺰ ﻭ ﻓﻼﻣﻨﻜﻮ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﺯ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻮژﻥ ﻭ ...ﻫﻤــﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ
ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻫﺮﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻲﭘﺴﻨﺪﻧﺪ
ﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﭘﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺳــﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺣﺬﻑ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻓﺎﺧﺮ«)!( ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ!
)ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻜﻲ ،ﺩﻭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻗﺒــﻞ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ
ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﺳــﺎﻳﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻱ...؟!( ﻣﺎ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﭘﺮﺕ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﭘﺸﺖﺑﺎﻣﻴﻢ! ﻋﺎﺷــﻖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ .ﻳﺎ
ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ »ﺧﺪﺍﻳﻲ« ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﺒﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﭼﺸﻢﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻋﻴﺐ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻨﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﻳﻢ ،ﻳﺎ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻐﺎﻝ
ﺑﭙﻨﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ!
ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ؛ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺧﺎﻛﺴﺘﺮﻱ .ﺑﺎ
ﻛﻠﻲ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺕ .ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ
ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ!
79
ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ
4
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻱﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺟﺐﭘﻮﺭ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﺲ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ
ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ
ﺣــﺲ ﺷــﻴﺮﻳﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃــﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺭﻣــﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺷﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﻧﻄﻔــﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﺩﻫﻢ .ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﻛﺘﻔﺎ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ »ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ« ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻡ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺳــﺮﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫــﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﻰ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻫﺘﻤــﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻡ ﺗﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫــﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻛﺴﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ،ﻛﻨﺶ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻯ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﻡ ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﺪ.
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ »ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻟﻐﻮ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺷــﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﻡ .ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺳﺨﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺣﺮﻓﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻡ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻫﻢﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ،ﭘﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﺒﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻢ.
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ »ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ« ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﻯ ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻢ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ »ﭘﺪﺭ« ﺁﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻢ.
ﻫﺮ ﭘﺪﺭﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻋﻮﺍ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻼﺷﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬــﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻯ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﺎﻳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﻨﺪﻳﺸﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺟﺰ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ »ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺗــﺎﺏ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻓــﻊ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺩﻫﻢ.
ﻣﻦ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 9ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺻﺒﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻢ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺘﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ
»ﻛﺮﻳﺲ ﺩﻯﺑﺮگ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺏ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻡ
ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ ،ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺣﺎﻻ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻯ
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﻡﻛﻪﺩﺭﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰﻫﻮﻳﺘﻰﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﻭﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰﺳﻨﺘﻰﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻋﻤﻞ ﺷــﻮﻡ؛ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﻛﺴﺘﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺘﻰ »ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻦ ﺧﻠﻌﺘﺒﺮﻯ« ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤــﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ »ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿــﺎ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻰ« ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢﺁﻭﺭﺩ.ﺍﻳﻦﺍﻣﺎﺑﻪﻫﻴﭻﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯﺭﻫﺎﻛﺮﺩﻥ»ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ«
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ،ﺍﻳﻦﮔﺮﻭﻩﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ»ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻣﻴﻦ«ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﻦﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻢ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺣﺎﻟﺸﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
80
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﭘﮋﻭﺍﻙ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻳﻦﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ،
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻳﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻃــﺮﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﻳﻦﻫﺎ .ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﻳــﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺗﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﺘــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ.
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻠﻮﺩﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻠﻮﺩﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﺳﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳــﺮﻭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻯ
ﻫﻢ ﻃﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ،
ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻭﺍﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻳﺶ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺟﺰﻭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ
ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺍﻧﺪ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢﺻﻨﻔﺎﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ،ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺳﺮﭘﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ
ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ – ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻓــﺮﻭﺵ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ
ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﻭ ﭘﺎپ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ -ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﻴﻢ.
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ
ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻯ ،ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ،ﺟﺪﻯ ﻭ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﺎ ﺷــﻚ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﺎ،
ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﺍﻝ ﻃﻼﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺑﻚ ﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻗﺼﺪ
ﺍﻭﺝﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺯﻭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﻛﺠﺎﺳــﺖ؟ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺻﺪﺍ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲﺍﺵ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻴﺮﺍژ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ ﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻁ
ﺩﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻓﺎﻟﺶ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻛﺮﻳﺲ ﺩﻯﺑﺮگ ﺁﻫﻨﮓ
ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ 12ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ
ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺎﺗﻮﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯ ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ
ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺭﻭﺯﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﺯﺩ ،ﻃﻼ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺟﺰﻭ ﭘﺮﻓﺮﻭﺵﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻭ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺒﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﺳﻤﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻢ ﻧﺸﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ ﺑﻰﺧﻮﺍﺑﻰ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺷﺒﺢ ﻛﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺖ؟ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯ ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺗﻴﺘﺮﺍژ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺩﻟﻨﻮﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ.
ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﺳﺮﺍﻫﺎ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﺳــﺮﺍﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻰ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻫﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﺳﺮﺍﻫﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﻳﻐﻤﺎ ﮔﻠﺮﻭﻳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﻓﺸﻴﻦ ﻳﺪﺍﻟﻠﻬﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻴﻠﻮﻓﺮ
ﻻﺭﻯﭘﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺴــﻨﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﺳــﺮﺍﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻳﺪ،
ﻛﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺯﻣﺰﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩﻫﺎ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻏﻠﻮ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺎﺝﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﺎﺑﻐﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ
ﭘﻴﺎﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ،
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﻣﻲﭘﺴﻨﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﻭ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻧﻪ ﺷــﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺗﻰ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺚ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﻧﻮﺍﺯ ،ﭘﺮﻛﺎﺷﻨﻴﺴﺖ،
ﮔﻴﺘﺎﺭﻳﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺴﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻯ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﻟﻦ
ﺑﻜﺸﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﺵ ،ﺑﻬﻨﺎﻡ ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻰ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺩﺭﺍﻡ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺗﻰ ﺗﺤﺖﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﻣﻴﻬﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺻﺎﻑ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳــﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻳﺎ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺟﺐﭘﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺻﺮﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﭘﻜﻴﺞ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺳــﺮ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧــﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻠﺪﻧــﺪ .ﺟﺎﻩﻃﻠﺐ ﻭ
ﺑﻠﻨﺪﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻩﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻮﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﻨﺪ .ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺷﻮﺭﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻰ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻫﺮﺑﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺗــﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺭﻭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺗﻠﻘــﻰ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺯﻳﺴــﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻭ ﺷﻐﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻰﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ
ﺧﻮﺵﺗﻴﭗ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻠﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻞ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻦ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺿﻌﻔﺶ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺻﺤﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻃﻰ 11ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﭘﻰ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺮﺍﻭﺩﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺑﺎﺑﻚ ﻏﻔﻮﺭﻱﺁﺫﺭ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﭼﺸﻤﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ،ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﺮﺍﻭﺩﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ
ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺩﺭﺭﻭﻳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﺵ ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ،ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ – ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ .ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺳﻤﭙﻮﺯﻳﻮﻡ ﻣﺠﺴﻤﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻭ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻲﺍﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨـﺪ ﻣـﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﻴـﺮ ،ﺳـﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠـﻰ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧـﻰ
ﻛـﻪ ﺧﺎﻧـﻪ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﻟـﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺁﻧﻬـﺎ ﺑـﻮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐﻫﺎﻳـﻰ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺳـﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﭼﺸﻤﮕﻴﺮﻯ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪ ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺩﻣﺎﻥ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻑ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻢ.
ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ ﺟــﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻧﮕﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﻭﻛﺴــﺐ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﻄﺮﺍﺯ ﺑﻜﻮﺷﺪ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺏ
ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﻭﺵﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻛﻴﺎﺭﺳﺘﻤﻰ،
ﺟﻌﻔــﺮ ﭘﻨﺎﻫﻰ ،ﺧﺎﻧــﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﺨﻤﻠﺒﺎﻑ ،ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﻣﺠﻴــﺪﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ
ﺟﻠﻴﻠﻰ ،ﺭﺧﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﻰﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻭ ...ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺭﻭﺯﺁﻣﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴــﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﭘﺲ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﻄﻞ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻔﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻯ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺒﻪ ،ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﻰ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ
ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻰ/ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻰ
ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﻰ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﻧﺪ .ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ .ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ.
ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ،ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻔﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻕ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ،ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻓﺠﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺟﺸﻦ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺪﻳﺸﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺴــﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻳــﻚ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ
ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻮﺷــﺶ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻛﺎﻻﻯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ
ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻳﻖ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻯ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ 5ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻰ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻰ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﻭﺵﻣﻨﺪ،
ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻴﻢ .ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺳﻌﻰ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺧﻮﺩﻯ ﻭ
ﻏﻴﺮﺧﻮﺩﻯ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﭼﻨﺪ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻨﺶ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻴﺰﺑﺎﻧــﻰ ﻫﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﺍﺳــﻜﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻴﺎﻥ ،ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﺗﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻘﻴﻢ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻢ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻢ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺷﺠﺎﻉ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺷﺪ.
ﭘﺲ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﻯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻓﻜﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻔﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮﻯ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻛﻤﻜﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴﺪ؟ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﻣﻴﺰﺑﺎﻧﻰﺗﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
81
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ،ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﻣﺜﻼ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ؟
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻰ.
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧــﺖ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻌﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺫﻯ ﺭﺑﻂ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘــﻰ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ،ﺗﻌــﺪﺍﺩ 10ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﭘﺎﻭﻳﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻦ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﺎﻟﻴﻮﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ.
ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻬـﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻭﺵﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ؛ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻰ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺧﺎﺹ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﻭﺵﻣﻨﺪ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫــﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺶ ﻛﻨﻢ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻛﻨﻴــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻝ 87ﭼﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺸﻮﻳﺪ 10 .ﻧﻔﺮ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﻛﻦ 11 ،ﻧﻔﺮ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﺍﺳــﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ 10ﻧﻔﺮ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ
ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻳﻜﺴــﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺪﻑ ﻏﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﻪ ﻭ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ .ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻗﺐ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯﺷﺪﻛﻪﺩﺭﺻﺪﺭﺁﻧﻬﺎﺷﺨﺺﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭﻫﻨﺮﻯﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺴـﺌﻮﻝ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻧﻰﺍﺵ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﺪ.
ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 30ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺧﺸﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪ ﺷﻜﺎﻓﻰ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻭ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺑﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﻳﻚ ﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻰﺭﺍﻧﻴﻢ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺼﺒﻰ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻯ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﺪ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ
ﻛﻠﻰ ،ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ،ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳــﺘﺜﻨﺎ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻰ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﺍﺭ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ
ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﺩﻭ ﺷﺐ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻯ ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﮔﻮﺷﺰﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﺻﻼﺡ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﺪ .ﺳﻴﺪ ﮔﻨﻴﺲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﺍﻯ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻔﻴﺮ ﺳﻮﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ،ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﻫﻴﻼﺭﻯ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻮﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﺒﻴﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ )ﺍﻋﻢ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺴﺖﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪﻯ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ( ﺭﺍ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ؟ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧـﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ
ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
82
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮ ،ﻟﻮﻛﻴﺸﻦ ،ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻜﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ
ﻭ ...ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺜﻞ
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺳﻤﻴﻨﺎﺭ ،ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻯ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺟﺸﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ،ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺤﻠﻪ
ﺑﺎﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﻜﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻋﺬﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﻙ ﻏﺰﺍﻟﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻟﻐﻮ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﺍ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺎﺑﺖ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻮﻛﻴﺸﻦ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ »ﻣﺨﺘﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ« ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ .ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﺗﺤﺖﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻟﻮﻛﻴﺸﻦ ﻭ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ ﻣﺨﺘﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ
ﮔﻨﺠﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻔﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﺖﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﺸﺴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﻋﻤﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﻧﻮﻟﻮگ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگ.
ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﺩﻯﻭﻯﺩﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻤﻴﻨﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﺵ
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺨﺘﮕﻰ ،ﻣﺸــﻖ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺸﻖ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻰ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺨﺘﮕﻰ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺳــﻴﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺮﺗﺐ ﻣﺮﺍﻭﺩﺍﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺟﻠﺴــﺎﺕ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ،ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﺨﺘﮕﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﻴﻢ.
ﺁﻥ ﻃـﺮﻑ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑـﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻠﺴـﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮ ﺳﻤﻴﻨﺎﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳــﺶ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻤﺘﺎﻳﺎﻥﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺳــﻤﻴﻨﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻــﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻭ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻧﺎﭘﺨﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺨﺘﮕﻰ
ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ .ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻦ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﭼﺘﺮ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﻛﻦ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ.
ﻳﻚﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﺿﻴﺎء ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ .ﺁﻥ ﭘﺎﻭﻳﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺁﺷــﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻦ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﭘﺎﻭﻳﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﻮﺭ ﻭ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ؟ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ؟ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺮﺍﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸــﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻦ
ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻰ
ﺟﺸــﻦ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪﺟــﺰ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﻰ ﻭ ﻏﻔﻠﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶﺍﺵ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﻒ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﻰ )ﺗﺸﺘﺖ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻳﻚﭘﺎﺭﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺸﺎﻥ( ،ﺑﻘﻴﻪ
ﺳــﻪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺻﻨﻒ ،ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔــﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ
ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺐ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻪ
ﻋﺰﻳﻤﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﮔﺬﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﺷﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ
ﺭﺿﺎ ﻛﻴﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﮔﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﺍﺧﺬ ﻭﻳﺰﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﻴﺎﺭﺳــﺘﻤﻰ
ﻭ ﻣﻬﺮﺟﻮﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﺎﻫﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺁﻗﺎﻯ
ﻛﻴﺎﺭﺳﺘﻤﻰ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻧﮕﺸﺖﻧﮕﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻔﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﺮﺟﻮﻳﻰ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﺳــﻔﺮﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻧﺼﺮﺍﻑ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﺘﺒﻰ ﺭﺍﻋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻣـﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺷـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻠﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺳﻔﺮﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲﺑﻮﺩ.ﺍﻛﺜﺮﺍﺍﺯﺻﻨﻒﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﺵ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻫﺠﻮﻡ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ،ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺳﺎﺯﻭﻛﺎﺭ
ﺧﺮﺩﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﺵ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺼــﻮﻻﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺪﺍﺑﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺍﻍ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻨﻒ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﻴﺰﺑﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﻣﻴﺰﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ 6 .ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ،ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﻜﺪﻩ ،ﺳﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮ ،ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻳﻚ
ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻰ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟـﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺳـﻴﺖ ﺳـﻔﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻰ ﻗﻄـﺮﻩﺍﻯ ،ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺧﺒـﺮ ﻭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷـﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ
ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺎﻟﻴﻮﻭﺩ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷـﺪ .ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ،ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺳـﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎﺑﺎﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩﻭﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎﺩﺭﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﭼﻪﮔﺬﺷﺖ؟
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺷــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻓﻀﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺷﺐ ﻫﺮ
ﺷﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ – ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ 60ﺗﺎ 70ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻘﻴﻢ ﻟﺲﺁﻧﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺷﺐ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ
ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﮔﻨﻴﺲ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻪ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸﺪ.
ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﻭ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻮﺷــﺶ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻠﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻔﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺳﻪ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺗﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎ ﺳﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﭘﺪﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﻧﻪ .ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺍﻛﺴﻴﮋﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺳــﻪ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻳﻚ
ﻭﺭﻙﺷﺎپ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺎﺯﻟﻰ ﻣﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺑﻠﻮ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﺶ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻘﻰ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﺗﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻫﻨﺮ – ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺷﺮﻕ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺁﺷــﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻠﻞ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺵﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ
ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﻚ ﮔﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺟﺸــﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﺍﻯ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻻﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪﻓﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻓﻜـﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻋﻀـﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﺮﺍﻭﺩﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺻﺮﻑ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﻰ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻰ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳــﻚ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﻼﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪﺩﺍﺭ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑــﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﻪﺟﻮﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺻــﺮﻑ ﻣﺒﺎﻟﻎ
34ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 22ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ
ﺷــﺪ ،ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺑــﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ 2100ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻯ
ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺁﻥ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻖ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳــﻪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻃﻰ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻰ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻯ
ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻯﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺵ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩﻣﺎﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ
ﺣﻖ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﻒ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺷﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺸﺨﻨﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺸــﻮﺭﺕ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﻰﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺷﻐﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺳــﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥﻫﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ
ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻰ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧــﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ .ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ
ﺧﻮﺭﺍﻙ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ 10ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ ﻭ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻤﻨﺪﻯ ﺻﻨﻒ .ﺿﻤﻨــﺎ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺳــﻬﻢﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭﺯﻥ ﻭ
ﺣﺠﻢﺍﺵ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺗﻠﻪﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺗﻠﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻴﺸــﺘﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﭼﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺳــﻬﻢ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ
ﻓﺎﺭﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻪ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩﺍﻯ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭ ﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ .ﭼــﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻳﻜﻪﺗﺎﺯ
ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﻓﺎﺭﺳــﻰ 1ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻳﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ؟
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ؟
ﺍﻳﻦﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻛﻪﺷﻤﺎﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡﺑﻪﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﺧﺎﺻﻰﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩﻛﻪ
ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻧﻬﺎﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂﻓﻌﻠﻰﺭﺍﭘﺪﻳﺪﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﻭﺍﺻﻼﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑﻇﺎﻫﺮﺵﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖﻭﻛﺎﻣﻼﻫﻢﺻﻨﻔﻰﺍﺳﺖ.ﻣﻦﺍﺯﺣﺪﻭﺩﻳﻜﺴﺎﻝﭘﻴﺶﻛﻪﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻡ ،ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ.ﻣﺜﻼ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩﻛﻞﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪﭼﻨﺪﻓﻴﻠﻢﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺑﻮﺩﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩﻭﻣﺎ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﺻﻨﻒﺩﺭﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯﺍﻋﻀﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥﻛﻪﺍﺯﻣﺎﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ
ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪﺍﺳﺖ.ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻳﻰﺍﺯﻫﺮﺻﻨﻒﺩﺭﺟﻠﺴﻪﻣﺠﻤﻊﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰﺭﺍﻯ
ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻣﻮﻇﻔﻨﺪﺑﻪﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯﺭﺍﻯﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪﻭﺍﻋﻀﺎﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺤﻘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊﺻﻨﻒﺑﻪﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﻯﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩ.ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪﺗﺎ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖﻭﺑﺮﺍﻯﺑﻪﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ،
ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰﺭﺍﺑﻪﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕﻣﻰﻃﻠﺒﺪ.ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻣﺜﺎﻝﻫﻤﻴﻦﻣﻮﺭﺩﺍﺧﻴﺮ.
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺁﺋﻴﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺗﻴﻢ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷﺪﻩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻯﺑﺮﺯﻳﺪﻩﻫﻢﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﻣﺎﺑﻌﺪﺍﺯﺩﻭﺟﻠﺴﻪﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰﻛﻪﺍﻋﻼﻡﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﺍﺯ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ 200ﻓﻴﻠﻢﺩﺭﺳﺎﻝ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ 50ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﺁﻗﺎﻯ
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﺪﻩﻫﻢﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪﻛﻪﭼﻮﻥﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪﺍﻳﻦﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪﻭﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻋﺴــﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺎﻣــﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ
ﺷﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻭ
ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡﺯﺩﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰﭘﺲﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩﺭﻭﺯﻃﻰﺍﻃﻼﻋﻴﻪﺍﻯﺩﺭﻧﺸﺮﻳﺎﺕﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻯﻧﻔﺮﻣﺴﺘﻌﻔﻰﻫﻢﻣﺎﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥﻓﺮﺩﻯﺭﺍﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ.ﺧﺐ
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ.
83
ﻣﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ -ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﺑــﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ؛
ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﻴﻒﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ،ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺟﻠﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺷﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺸﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ
ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻲ ﺍﺳــﻜﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻧﮕﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﻬﺪﻯ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ،ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻥﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻤﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ،ﻃﻴﻒ ﺷﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ
ﻭ ﺳــﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ،ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻭ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻯ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﺪﻩ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺷــﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨــﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺳــﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺷﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎ
ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺸﻦ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺟﺸﻨﻰ ﻛﻪ »ﺻﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ« ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻰ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﻭ »ﺧﺎﻙ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ« ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥﺁﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺟﺪﻯ
84
ﺟــﻮﺍﺩ ﺷــﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄــﻊ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﻣﺸــﺎﻭﺭ ﻫﻨــﺮﻯ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﺪ .ﺷــﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺣﺬﻑ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻯ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻋﺴــﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ،ﭘﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸﻦ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ »ﺧﺎﻙ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﺟﻮﺍﻳﺰ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺧﺸﻢ ﺷﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺩﺭ
ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﺧﺸﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﺟﺪﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ
ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺳﺮ ﺧﻢ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ.
ﻫﺎﻟﻴﻮﻭﺩﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺷﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻧﺶ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺸﻦ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺳﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﻟﮕﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻲ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ 1387ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮ
ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻧﮕﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻲ ﺍﺳــﻜﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺩﺩﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻣﻌﻨــﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺻﻤﻴﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ
ﺿﺪﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺿﺪﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﭼﻴﺴــﺖ؟ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺎﻟﻴﻮﻭﺩ
ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻃﻲ ﺳﻲﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﻭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻋﺬﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻫﺎﻟﻴﻮﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﺭ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ،
ﻣﻴﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﻬﻤﺎﻥﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﻬﻤﺎﻥﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻮﻩ ﻭ ﻋﻈﻤﺖ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﻴﻬﻤﺎﻥﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﻣﺎ
ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﻋﺬﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﺗﻤﺪﻥ ﻭ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺷــﻮﻳﻢ .ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺬﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻫﺎﻟﻴﻮﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﺭ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ«.
ﺷــﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸــﺎﻭﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ» :ﻣﻠﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﺎﻟﻴﻮﻭﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺣﻖ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻫﺠﻤﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺧﺸﻢ ﻭ
ﻧﻔﺮﺕ ﭘﺸــﺖ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻟﻴﻮﻭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺑــﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻡ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ« ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ » «300ﺩﻭ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﺎﺣﺶ ﻭ
ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﺩﺭﻭﻍﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﻛﺸﺘﻲﮔﻴﺮ« ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫــﺪﻑ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻏﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺻﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛــﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺩ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ«.
ﺷــﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻨــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻋﺬﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﺭ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺷﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭘﺎ ﭘﺲ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ .ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺳﺮ ﭘﻴﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﭼﺮﺧﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺳﻤﺎ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﻨــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﺭﺑﻄﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺷــﻮﺏﻫﺎ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺻﻨﻒ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻭ ﻣﺮگﺁﻭﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﻓﻬﻤﻢ .ﺗﺎﺳﻒ ﺟﺪﻯﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ -ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻡ )ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ(
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻳﺪﻙ ﻣﻰﻛﺸﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺷﻮﺏ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧــﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺳــﻒ ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ،ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮ ،ﺍﺳﻤﺶ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪﭘﺮﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺍﭘﻮﺯﻳﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ،
ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﻥﺷــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ،
ﺳــﻠﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻠﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻥﺷــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﭘﺮﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯﺷــﺎﻥ )ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ( ﺍﺯ
ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺳﺮ ﺑﺰﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﻰﺍﻳﺴــﺘﻨﺪ «.ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺍﺭﺷــﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻫﺸــﺪﺍﺭ ﺟﺪﻯ ،ﺑﻴــﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ
ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺻﻨﻮﻑ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻻﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺻﻨﻒ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻭﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦﺑﺎﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﺑﻪﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﺧﺎﻧﻪﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﻔﺖ»:ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭﺩﻯ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺭﺩ ،ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻭ ﺭﺳﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﺭﺑﻄﻰﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦﺁﺷﻮﺏﻫﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ
ﺑﺎﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ،ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﺑﺎﻳﺪﺍﻭﺭﺍﺍﺯﺍﻳﻦﺻﻨﻒ
ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﻓﻬﻤﻢ .ﭼﺮﺍ
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻜﻮﺗﻰ ﻣﺮگﺁﻭﺭ
ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻡ ﺣﺠﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻛﻤﻚﺷﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ
ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻋﺴــﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺳــﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻰﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻰ؛ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ .ﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻡ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ
ﺗﻨﺶﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ،ﺭﻓﻊ ﺧﺸــﻮﻧﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺑــﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ،ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻜﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢﺭﺍﻯﻫﺎﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﭼﻪ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺻﺒﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺑﻰﺍﻧﺼﺎﻓﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻓﺶ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻮء ﻳﺎ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﺴﺒﻰ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﻓﻬﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺟﻤﻌﻰ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ
ﻳﺎ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺍﻏﺮﺍﺽ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﻋﻴﻦ ﻏﻴﺮﺕ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ» :ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ! »ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻣﺮﮔﺒﺎﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ«
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺳــﻜﻮﺗﺶ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﻔﻊ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﺵ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺗﻔﺘﻴﺶ ﻋﻘﺎﻳﺪﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﺍﺵ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻜﻮﺗﺶ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺘــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﭘﺎﺩﮔﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻓﺘﺢ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻰ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ «.ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ
ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺷﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩﻛﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ
ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺭﺍﻩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎ
ﺑﺤﺜﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ،ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ
ﮔﺮﺩﻫﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺷﻨﺒﻪ 27ﺁﺑﺎﻥ
ﻣﺎﻩ ،1388ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺭﻭﺯ ﻳﻜﺸﻨﺒﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺁﺫﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﺎﺯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺟﺪﻯﺗﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ
ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺳــﻜﻮﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻓﺎﻥ
ﺑــﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻪ ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬــﺎﺩ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﺩﻫﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺻﻨﺎﻑ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ،ﺻﺪﻭﺭ 300ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪﺳﺎﺧﺖﻭﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ 45ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻭﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﺗﺎﺯﻩﺑﺮﺍﻯﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯﺻﺪﻭﺭﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪﺳﺎﺧﺖﺩﺭﺟﻬﺖﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥﺑﻮﺩﻥﻳﺎﻧﺒﻮﺩﻥﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﻛﺮﺩﻭﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭﺷﺪﻛﻪﺑﺮﺍﻯﺭﻭﺷﻦ
ﺷﺪﻥﺍﻳﻦﺍﺑﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯﺑﻪﺟﻮﺍﺩﺷﻤﻘﺪﺭﻯ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥﺍﻣﻮﺭﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻛﻪﻫﻨﻮﺯﭘﺎﺳﺨﻰﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴــﻦ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﺪﻩ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ )ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻮﭼﻬﺮ
ﺷﺎﻫﺴــﻮﺍﺭﻯ( ،ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻳﺴــﻨﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ
ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ؛
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺗﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
300ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ 45ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﻒﺍﷲ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﻴﻨﻪ ،ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺧﻮﺩﻯ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﭼﻄﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻣﻦ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﺟﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﺷﻮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻯ
ﺑﺎﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﺁﻭﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ
ﺭﺣﻴﻢﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻜﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﻳــﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ «.ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽﻫــﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﺯﻳﺪﻩ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ» :ﻫﻤــﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﻳﻠﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺷﻨﻪﺁﺷﻴﻞ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ .ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﺣﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻧﻪ ﺻﻼﺡ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ،
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻰﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻉﺍﻟﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪﻯ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﺨﻮﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﻃﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻐﻠﺘﻨﺪ«.
ﺑﺮﺯﻳﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺭﺳﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻠﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻭﻋﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ .ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻯ ﺻﺮﻳﺢﺍﻟﻬﺠﻪ
ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﮔﻰ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ؛ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻗﻄﻌــﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻓــﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬــﺎﺩ ،ﺻﻨﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
85
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ »ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ« ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺟﻴﻤﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ
ﺟﺎﻩﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﺗﺎﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﻚ
ﺭﺿﺎ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ
ﻧــﺎﻡ ﺟﻴﻤﺰ ﻛﺎﻣــﺮﻭﻥ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺘــﺮﺍﺩﻑ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺑــﺎ ﺟﺎﻩﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﻭ ﻳﻚ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﻲﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ
ﻧﻔﺴﮕﻴﺮﺭﻭﺑﺎﺕﻫﺎﺩﺭ»ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻨﺎﺗﻮﺭ:2ﺭﻭﺯﺭﺳﺘﺎﺧﻴﺰ«ﻳﺎﻫﻨﺮﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲﺁﺭﻧﻮﻟﺪ
ﺷﻮﺍﺭﺗﺰﻧﻴﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﺖ ﺩﺭ »ﺩﺭﻭﻍﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ« ﻳﺎ ﻏﺮﻕ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﻛﺸــﺘﻲ ﺗﺎﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻥ »ﺍﺭﻭﺍﺡﻭﺭﻃﻪ« )(2003
ﻭ »ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧــﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻕ« ) (2005ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣــﻮﺵ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ »ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ« ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳﺎﻝﺗﻼﺵﺑﻲﻭﻗﻔﻪﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﺗﻨﻬﺎﺩﻟﻴﻞﺍﻳﻦﻭﻗﻔﻪ
ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪﺗﻤﺎﻡﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺟﺎﻩﻃﻠﺐ ،ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ
ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ ﺑﺨﺸــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻩﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ 237ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭﻱﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﺳﻮﻡﺟﺪﻭﻝﭘﺮﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦﺁﺛﺎﺭﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ.ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻼﻭﻩﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭﺷﺎﻳﻊﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱﻓﻴﻠﻢ)ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕﻭ(...ﺩﺭﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖﺍﺯ
ﭘﺎﻧﺼﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﺎﻛﺲ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ »ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ« ﺑﺮﺍﻱﺷــﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺩﺩﻫﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺟﻤﻊﻭﺟﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ).ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ»ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ«
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ»ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺲ«ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻟﻐﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻪ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺳﺖ-1:ﺩﺭﺁﻳﻴﻦﻫﻨﺪﻭ:ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﮔﻮﻧﻪﻳﻚﺭﻭﺡﺭﻫﺎﺷﺪﻩﻳﺎﻳﻚ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻥﺑﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ-2،ﺗﺠﺴﻢﻳﺎﭘﻴﻜﺮﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺮﺻﻔﺖﻳﺎﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ -3 ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ :ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻲ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﻱ(
ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﺟﻴﻚ ﺳــﺎﻟﻲ ﺗﻜﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺠﺮﻭﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺣــﺎﻻ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻤﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻓﻠﺞ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﺪﺩﺍ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺟﻴﻚ
ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻧﺪﻭﺭﺍ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻤﺮﻱ ﺟﻨﮕﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﻛﻬﻜﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﻣﻤﻠﻮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﻭﺣﺸــﺘﻨﺎﻙ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺪﺭﺕ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﭘﺎﻧﺪﻭﺭﺍ ﺯﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﺎﻭﻱﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮋﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﺗﺮ ،ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﻨﺪ .ﻧﺎﻭﻱﻫﺎ ﺳــﻪ ﻣﺘﺮ ﻗﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻡ .ﭘﻮﺳﺖﺷﺎﻥ ﺁﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺑﺮﻕﺯﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮﻱ ﻛﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺭﺯﺷــﻤﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻕ ﺟﻨﮕﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻧﺪﻭﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ،
ﻧﺎﻭﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻬﻤﮕﻴﻦﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﺷﺪﻩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻮﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﻧــﺪﻭﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻔﺲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ،
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺩﻭﺭﮔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ژﻧﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ/ﻧﺎﻭﻱ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻧﺪﻭﺭﺍ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺟﺴــﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺫﻫﻦ »ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ« ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
86
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺟﻴﻚ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺁﻭﺍﺗــﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺟﻴﻤﺰ ﻛﺎﻣــﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻥﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚ
»ﺿﺒﻂ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ« ) (Capture Motionﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭﻱ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ« ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ »ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻨﺎﺗــﻮﺭ «2ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ
ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻲﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ
ﻓﻨﻲﺍﺵ )ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻭﻳﺘﺎ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻝ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻴﻮﺯﻳﻠﻨﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺘﺮ ﺟﻜﺴﻦ ،ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺳﻪﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻫﺎﺳﺖ( ﺣﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺤﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﻮﻡ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﺲﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺩﻩﺳــﺒﺰ ﺍﻳﻔﺎﻱ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻫﻢﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻥ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻛﺎﺭﻱﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺍﻭﺗﺎﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲﻛﻪﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﭘﺎﻧﺪﻭﺭﺍ -ﻗﻤﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻓﺘــﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ-ﺗﻮﺍﻣﺎﻥﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱﻭﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲﺍﺳﺖ،ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱﺍﺻﻠﻲﺍﺯﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎ ِﺭﺟﻴﻚﻭﻧﻴﺘﺮﻱﺗﻮﺳﻂﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲﺟﺎﻥﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪﻭﺑﺎﺯﻱﺷﺎﻥ
ﺑﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﺟﺎﻥ ﻟﻨﺪﻭ،
ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ،ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ »ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩﺑﻲﻋﻴﺐﻭﻧﻘﺺﻣﻴﻤﻴﻚﭼﻬﺮﻩﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥﺩﺭﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ
ﻭ ﻧﺎﻭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ«.ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ
ﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺣﺴﮕﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺼﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﮔﺎﻟﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻩﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺷﺪ ﻣﻴﻤﻴﻚ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞﻛﻨﺪ.ﺍﻳﻦﺗﻼﺵﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲﻳﻚﺳﺎﻝﻭﻧﻴﻢﺑﻪﻃﻮﻝﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪﻭﻟﻲﺩﺭ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ»ﺿﺒﻂﻣﻴﻤﻴﻚﭼﻬﺮﻩ«ﻛﺎﻣﻞﺷﺪ.
ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻧﺶ ﺣﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻔــﺎﻱ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎ .ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻳــﻚ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺿﺒﻂ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ« ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ
ﻟﺒﺎﺱﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻫﻢﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﻱ ،ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ،ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﺭﻭﻫﺎ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﻣﻲﻧﺸﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍﻍﻫﺎ ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ،
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻋﺎﺯﻡ ﺳﻔﺮﻱ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﻳﻲ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
• ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺩﻫﻢ ژﻭﺋﻦ 2005ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸــﺮﻳﻪ ﻫﺎﻟﻴﻮﻭﺩ ﺭﻳﭙﻮﺭﺗﺮ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷــﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺟﻴﻤــﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ »ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ «880ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﻫﻢﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ »ﻓﺮﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ« ) ،2011ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ(
ﭘﻴﺶﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺭﻓﺖ.ﺩﺭﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﻳﻦﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﺍﺯﻳﻚﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻝ
ﺳﻪﺑﻌﺪﻱ)ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩﺗﻮﺳﻂﻭﻳﻨﺲﭘ ِﻴﺲ(ﻭﺍﺳﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱﻣﺠﺎﺯﻱ
)ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﻟﻴﮕﺎﺗﻮ( ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
• ﻣﺎﻳﻜﻞ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻔﺎﻱ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺳﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﻮﺍﺭﻳﭻ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺳﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻴﻤﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ
ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﮕﻮﺭﻧﻲ ﻭﻳﻮﺭ )ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ( ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ »ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ« ) (1986ﺑﻴﻔﺘﻨﺪ.
• ﺳﻴﮕﻮﺭﻧﻲ ﻭﻳﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻔﺎﮔﺮ ﭘﺮﺳﻮﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻴﻤﺰ
ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻴﮕﻮﺭﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ» :ﻣﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻴﻤﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ؛ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻛﻤﺎﻝﮔﺮﺍ ﻭ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﮔﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮﺑﻪﻓﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻪﺍﺵ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻔﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ
ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻧﻘﺒﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺯﺩﻡ«.
• ﺟﻴﻤــﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺗــﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ »ﺗﺎﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﻚ«
) (1997ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1999ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﺩ ﻭﻟــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﺍﻱ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ
ﺩﻻﺭﻱ ﻃﻠﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺳــﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮﻳﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻗﻔﻪﺍﻱ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ.
• ﭼﻬﻞﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺼﺖ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ
ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧــﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ
»ﺿﺒﻂ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ« ) ( Capture Motionﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
• ﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﮔﺎﻟﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ »ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻫﺎ :ﺩﻭ ﻗﻠﻌﻪ« )(2002
ﺟﻴﻤﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪﻗﺪﺭﻱ
ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻴﻤﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ:
»ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ« ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺲ ،ﺩﺭﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺳـﻂ ﺟﻒﺑﻮﺷـﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﻴﺮﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﭙﻠﻜﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻴﻤﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ؛ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﭘﻨﺠﺎﻩﻭﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳـﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻳـﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨـﻮﺍﻥ »ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ« ﺍﺛﺮﻱ
ﺣﻤﺎﺳﻲ/ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ،ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺠﺪﻫﻢ ﺩﺳﺎﻣﺒﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺗﺒﺮﻳﻚ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ،ﻓﻴﻠﻢﺗﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﻭ ﭼﺸﻤﮕﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺷﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ.
ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻥ .ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎﻟﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪﺗﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﺭﺯﻭ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﻪﻭﺍﺭ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺗﻤﺎﺷـﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻳـﮋﻩ ﺧﻴﺮﻩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻧـﻮﻭﻝ ﭘﺮﻓﺮﻭﺵ ،ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﻣﻴﻚ ﺑﻮﻙ
)ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﺼـﻮﺭ( ،ﺍﺳـﺒﺎﺏﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﻳـﺶ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ
ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺡﺑﺨﺸـﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺫﻫﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺷﺪ،
ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻮﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ
ﺿﻌﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﻣــﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ» .ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ« ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺶ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ 99ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ
ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﻲ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ« ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﻮﻥ ﺻﺒﺢ ﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﺑﺎﺧﺒﺮﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺸــﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻧﭽﺎﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﭘﻮﻝﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ »ﺳﻔﺮ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ« )ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ :ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻓﻀﺎ(» ،ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ« ﻭ
»ﻫﺮﻱ ﭘﺎﺗﺮ« ﻣﻲﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻳﻘﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻔﺮﻱ ﭘﺮﺍﺯ
ﺷﮕﻔﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻧﺒﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ »ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺲ« ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﺩ...
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺑﻠﻪ» ،ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺲ« ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ.
»ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜــﺲ« ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﮔﺮﺍﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻔﺮﻱ ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻥﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﻭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻋﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ »ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜـﺲ« ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ
ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪﻫـﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ ،ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺛﺮﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ
ﺑﻲﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺟﻴﻚ ﻋﺎﺯﻡ
ﺳﻔﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﻧﻬﺪ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ؛ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻴﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﭘﺎﺭﺗﻤﺎﻧﺶ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺵ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﭘﺎ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳـﺪ» :ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﻪ ﺗﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺰﺍﺱ ﻧﻴﺴـﺘﻲ«،
ﻟﺒﺨﻨـﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻟﺒﺎﻧﻢ ﻧﺸﺴـﺖ؛ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺳـﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺳـﻴﺎﺭﻩ »ﭘﺎﻧﺪﻭﺭﺍ« ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺣﺴـﻲ ﺍﺯ »ﺟﺎﺩﻭﮔﺮ ﺷﻬﺮﺍﻭﺯ«
ﺍﻟﻘﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝﻭﻫﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻲ ﺑﺮﺳــﻢ .ﻃﺮﺍﺡ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ،ﺭﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑــﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﻭﺛﻲ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺷﺨﺼﺎ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﺁﺩﻡ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻡ.
ﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻢ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻨﻢ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﺩ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ.
ﺍﻭﻟﻴـﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻓﻴﻠـﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﭘﺎﻧﺰﺩﻩ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻴﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺳـﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻛﻨﺠﻜﺎﻭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻢ
ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺨﻮﺵ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺧــﻮﺭﺩ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﻪﻗﺪﺭﻱ
ﮔﺮﺍﻥﻗﻴﻤــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻭﻝﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩﺵ ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺣﻤﺎﺳﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﺎﻟﻴﻮﻭﺩﻱ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ،
ﻃﺮﺡ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻋﻲ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺴﺨﻪﺍﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻱ ﻛــﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻳﺴﺖ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ
ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺣﺬﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ.
ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻙ ﻭ ﺍﺳـﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘـﺮﻭژﻩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻳـﻚ ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺣﺴـﺎﺱ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻧﻈﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠـﺐ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺰﻧﻴﺪ؟
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭ ﺫﻫﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﮔﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ »ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻧﺎﻥ« ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ
ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺘﻤﻨﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻳﺪﺭﻣﻨﻲ ،ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻴﺶﺩﺍﻭﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﺎ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﭽﻪ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﺫﻫﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻧــﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﻱ ﻳﺎ
ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮ ﺷــﻮﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥﺳﻮﻳﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ -ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺎﻧﺘﺰﻱ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻡ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺭﻭﻱﺷــﺎﻥ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ
ﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻏﺮﻭﺭ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮ
ﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ژﺍﻧﺮ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﺪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ژﺍﻧﺮ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻭﺍﺗﺎﺭ
ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ :ﺟﻴﻤﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ،
ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ :ﻣﻮﺭﻭ ﻓﻴﻮﺭﻩ،
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ :ﺟﻴﻤﺰ ﻫﻮﺭﻧﺮ ،ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ:
ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻮ ﺁﺭ .ﻣﻮﺭ ،ﺟﺎﻥ ﺭﻳﻔﻮﺁ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﻦ
ﺭﻳﻮﻛﻴﻦ ،ﻃﺮﺍﺡ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ :ﺭﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ
ﻭ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﻣﺒﺮگ ،ﻃﺮﺍﺡ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ:
ﻣِﻴﺰ ﺳﻲ .ﺭﻭﺑﻴﺌﻮ ﻭ ﺩﺑﻮﺭﺍ ﻟﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﺕ،
ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ :ﺟﻴﻤﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻥ
ﻟﻨﺪﻭ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ :ﺳﻢ ﻭﻭﺭﺛﻴﻨﮕﺘﻦ )ﺟﻴﻚ
ﺳﺎﻟﻲ( ،ﺳﻴﮕﻮﺭﻧﻲ ﻭﻳﻮﺭ )ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﮔﺮﻳﺲ
ﺁﮔﺴﺘﻴﻦ( ﻭ ﻣﻴﺸﻞ ﺭﻭﺩﺭﻳﮕﺰ )ﺗﺮﻭﺩﻱ
ﭼﺎﻛﻦ( ،ﺟﻴﻮﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﻳﺒﻴﺴﻲ )ﺳِ ﻠﻔﺮﻳﺞ(.
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ 2009ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ 166 ،ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ،
ژﺍﻧﺮ:ﺗﺮﻳﻠﺮ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻲ.
87
88
www.mosalas.ir
¾zÄkºH
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺧﺎﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺪﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺟﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ.
89
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺣﺞ
»ﺣﺞ ،ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪﻫﺮﻳﻚﺑﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲﺩﺭﺧﻮﺭﺗﻮﺟﻪﺍﺳﺖ.ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭﻛﻪﺑﺎﺗﻜﺒﻴﺮﻩﺍﻻﺣﺮﺍﻡ
ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ،ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺕ ﻧﺎﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﺯﮔﺰﺍﺭ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺴــﻠﻴﻢ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ،ﺁﻥ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴــﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺒﺤﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺡ ﭘﺮﺳــﺘﺶ ﻭ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﻓﺮﺍﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥﺷﺎﻣﮕﺎﻩﺣﻼﻝﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ،ﺩﺭﺣﺞﻭﻋﻤﺮﻩﻧﻴﺰﺑﺎﺍﺣﺮﺍﻡﻭﻟﺒﻴﻚ
ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺣﺮﺍﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺗﻌﺒﺪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺘﺤﺎﻥ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﻚ ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ،ﻋﻘﺪ ﺍﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻣﺤﺮﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺧﺪﺍﻱ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻊ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ،ﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻭ ﭘﻴﻐﻤﺒﺮ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻑ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺒﻴﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺭﺣﻠﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺤﻞ
ﺍﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻨﺰﻳﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﺳــﺘﻦ ﻣﺆﻣﻨــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﺎﺕ ﻭ
ﺭﺫﺍﻳﻞ ،ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺳــﻨﮕﻼﺥ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴــﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻈﺎﻫﺮ
ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺁﺯﻣﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﻫﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﻣﺎﻱ ﺯﻣﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻧﺶ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﻞ
ﺗﻔﺮﺝ ﻣﺮﻓﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﻣﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻞ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ
ﺳــﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﺗﻮ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﺖ
ﻣﻤﺪﻭﺣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﻚ ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮﻩ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﮔﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﺎﺕ ،ﭘﺎﻙ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ«.
)ﻧﻬﺞﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻪ ،ﺧﻄﺒﻪ /192ﺑﻨﺪ 53ـ (65
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﺍﺯ ﻋﻄﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻱ
ﺧﻮﺵ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﺮﻏﻴﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺣﺮﺍﻡ
ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﻚ ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺎﻟﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺪﺑﻮ ،ﻳﺎ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﮕﺎﻩ ،ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﻄﺒﻮﻉ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺍﻧﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻪ ،ﺗﻔﺎﺧﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺒﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻣﻲﺯﺩﺍﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮﻩ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ،ﺑﻨﺪﻩﻭﺍﺭﺳﺘﻪ ﺣﻖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺘﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻬــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ؛ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺻﻴﺪ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺻﺤﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺤﺮﻡ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ
ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ» :ﻻ ﺗﻘﺘﻠﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﺣﺮﻡ« ﻣﺎﺋﺪﻩ 95/ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺁﻫﻮﺍﻥ ﺻﺤﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺒﻮﺗﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺷﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻴﺮﺭﺱ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﻣﺤﺮﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻳﻀﻪ
ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ» :ﻟ ِﻴﺒﻠﻮﻧﻜﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺑ ِﺸﻲ ٍء ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻴﺪ ﺗﻨﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻜﻢ
ﻭﺭﻣﺎﺣﻜﻢ« ﻣﺎﺋﺪﻩ.94/
ﺍﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺁﻥ ،ﺭﻭﺡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻴﺪ ﻫﺮ ﺷﻬﻮﺕ
ﻭ ﻏﻀﺒــﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻐﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺑﺎﻃﻠﻲ ﭘﺎﻙ ﻭ ﺩﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﺧﺎﻣﻲ
ﻧﺠﺎﺕﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ.ﺣﺞ،ﻭﺣﻲﻣﻤﺜﻞﺍﺳﺖ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍﻣﻨﺎﺳﻚﺁﻥﺑﺎﻭﺣﻲﺗﺠﻠﻲ
90
ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺧﺪﺍ)ﺹ( ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ ،ﻓﺮﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﻭﺣﻲ
ﻛﻪﺑﻪﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ)ﻉ(ﻧﻴﺰﻣﻨﺎﺳﻚﺣﺞﺁﻣﻮﺧﺖ،ﻓﺮﺍﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ،ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻧﺒﻴﺎ)ﻉ( ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻗﻮﻣﻲ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ
ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﺍﻱ ﺳــﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩ:
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﺍﻣﺘﻲ ﻣﻨﺴﻚ )ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺕ( ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ» :ﻟﻜﻞ ﺍﻣﻪ ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎ
ﻣﻨﺴﻜﺎً« ﺣﺞ .67/ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺪ» :ﻟﻜﻞ ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎ
ﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﺷِ ﺮﻋﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎﺟﺎ« ﻣﺎﺋﺪﻩ.48/
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﻭ ،ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴــﻢ)ﻉ( ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻨــﺎﻱ ﻛﻌﺒﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺪﺍﻱ
ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ:
»ﺍﺭِﻧﺎ ﻣَﻨﺎﺳِ ﻜﻨﺎ« ﺑﻘﺮﻩ .128/ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ،ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻳﺎﺩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺧﺪﺍﻱ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻭﺣﻲ،
ﺣﻜــﻢ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮﺵ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ؛ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ» :ﺃَﻗِﻢ ﺍﻟﺼَ ﻠﻮﻩ
ﺍﻟﺸﻤﺲ ﺍﻟﻲ ﻏﺴﻖِ ﺍﻟ ّﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺠﺮ ...ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﺘﻬﺠﺪ ﺑﻪ
ِ
ِﺪﻟﻮﻙ
ِ
ﻟ
ﻧﺎﻓِﻠﻪ ﻟﻚ« ﺇﺳﺮﺍء 78/ـ .79ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ:
»ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺮﺳــﻮﻝ ﺑﻠ ِﻎ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺰﻝ ﺍﻟﻴﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺑﻚ ﻓﺎﻥ ﻟﻢ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ
ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﷲ ﻳﻌِﺼﻤﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ« ﻣﺎﺋﺪﻩ 67/ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺷﺎﻳﺴــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ» :ﻭ ﺟﻌﻠﻨﺎﻫﻢ ﺍﺋ ِﻤﻪ ﻳﻬﺪﻭﻥ ﺑ ِﺎﻣﺮِﻧﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺣﻴﻨﺎ
ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻟﺨﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺼﻠﻮﻩ ﻭ ﺇﻳﺘﺎء ﺍﻟﺰﻛﻮﻩ« ﺍﻧﺒﻴﺎء.73/
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ)ﻉ( ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻀﺮ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻮﺍﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﭘﻴﺶ ﻭﻱ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺣﺞ )ﻃﻮﺍﻑ ،ﺳﻌﻲ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻓﻴﻦ
ﻭ (...ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺧﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ.
)ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻪ (163/8
ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﻚ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺣﺞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﺮﺩ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺧﺪﺍﻱ
ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩ» :ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻨﻮﺍ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻋﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺼِ ﻴﺎﻡ« ﺑﻘﺮﻩ183/
ﺑﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ﻧﺸﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺜﻞ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻣﺘﺤﻘﻖ
ﺷﺪﻩ،ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕﻋﻴﻨﻲﻧﺎﺯﻝﺷﺪ.ﮔﻮﺍﻩﺍﻳﻦﺳﺨﻦﺟﻤﻠﻪ»ﻭﺍﺭِﻧﺎﻣﻨﺎﺳﻜﻨﺎ«
ﺑﻘﺮﻩ 128/ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ« ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺣﺼﻮﻟﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖﺗﺎﺫﻫﻦﺍﺯﺭﺍﻩﺗﺼﻮﺭﻭﺗﺼﺪﻳﻖﺁﻥﺭﺍﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﺪ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱﺍ ِﺷﻬﺎﺩﻭ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲﺍﺳﺖ؛ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪﺩﺭﺁﻳﻪﺷﺮﻳﻔﻪ»ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚﻧﺮﻱﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢﻣﻠﻜﻮﺕ
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻮﺍﺕﻭﺍﻻﺭﺽ ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻮﻥﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻗﻨﻴﻦ«ﺍﻧﻌﺎﻡ 75/ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ)ﻉ( ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩ » :ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﻋﺰﻭﺟﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ)ﻉ( ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺣﺞ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﻛﻦ ﺣﺮﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ ...ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺰ ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻡ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ :ﺍﻱ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ! ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻡ ﻓﺮﻭﺩ ﺁﻳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻏﺴــﻞ
ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻏﺴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪﺑﺮﺍﻱﺍﺣﺮﺍﻡﻣﻬﻴﺎﺷﻮﻧﺪ.ﻫﺮﺩﻭﭼﻨﺎﻥﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.ﺳﭙﺲﺑﻪﺍﻣﺮﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ
ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩﺣﺞﺷﺪﻧﺪﻭﺁﻧﺎﻥﺭﺍﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﺗﺎﻟﺒﻴﻚﻫﺎﻱﭼﻬﺎﺭﮔﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱﻛﻪﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﻟﺒﻴﻚ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ .ﺳﭙﺲ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺻﻔﺎ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ
ﻓﺮﻭﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ،ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻛﻌﺒﻪ ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺒﻴﺮ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﻫﺮﺩﻭﺗﻜﺒﻴﺮﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ.ﺧﺪﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻤﺪﻛﺮﺩﻭﺁﻥﺩﻭﻧﻴﺰﺣﻤﺪﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﻭ
ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞﺧﺪﺍﻱﺭﺍﺗﻤﺠﻴﺪﮔﻔﺖﻭﺁﻥﺩﻭﻧﻴﺰﺗﻤﺠﻴﺪﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪﻭﺍﻭﺧﺪﺍﺭﺍﺛﻨﺎ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﺁﻥﺩﻭﻧﻴﺰﭼﻨﺎﻥﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞﺟﻠﻮﺁﻣﺪﻭﺁﻥﺩﻭﻧﻴﺰﺟﻠﻮﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺧﺪﺍﻱ ﻋﺰﻭﺟﻞ ﺛﻨﺎ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺠﻴﺪﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﺠﺮ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻼﻡ ﺣﺠﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ
ﻧﻴﺰﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﺩﺍﺩﺗﺎﺣﺠﺮﺍﻻﺳﻮﺩﺭﺍﺍﺳﺘﻼﻡﻛﻨﻨﺪﻭﻫﻔﺖﺑﺎﺭﺁﻥﺩﻭﺭﺍﺑﻪﮔﺮﺩ
ﻛﻌﺒﻪﻃﻮﺍﻑﺩﺍﺩ.ﺳﭙﺲﺑﺎﺁﻥﺩﻭﺩﺭﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ)ﻉ(ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻭﺩﻭﺭﻛﻌﺖ
ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﻚﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﺍﺩ)«.ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻪ(163/8
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ،ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮ)ﻉ( ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺍﻣــﺮﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻭ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﭘﻴﻐﻤﺒﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺁﺩﻡ)ﻉ( ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ)ﻉ( ﺑﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﻓﻀﻞ ﺍﻧﺒﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺗﻢ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ)ﺹ( ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ) .ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻪ
160/8ـ (171ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ)ﻉ( ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩ» :ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺳﻮﻱ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩ .ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ ... :ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺗﻮ
ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﻜﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﭘﺎﻛﻴﺰﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮ ﺑﻴﺎﻣﻮﺯﻡ .ﭘﺲ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻌﺒﻪ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﻧﺎﺯﻝ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻌﺒﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ .ﺁﻥ ﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﻴﺖﺍﻟﻤﻌﻤﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ» :...ﺍﻥ ﺍﷲ
ﺑﻌﺚﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞﺍﻟﻲﺁﺩﻡ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ...:ﺍﻥﺍﷲﺍﺭﺳﻠﻨﻲﺍﻟﻴﻚﻻﻋﻠﻤﻚﺍﻟﻤﻨﺎﺳﻚ
ﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﻄﻬﺮ ﺑﻬﺎ) «...ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻪ (160/8
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ)ﻉ( ﻣﻲﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺪ :ﺑﺎ ﭘﺪﺭﻡ ﻃﻮﺍﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ.
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺠﺮ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﺶ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴــﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﻛﻦ ﻳﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﭘﺮﺳــﻴﺪﻡ :ﻓﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺷﻮﻡ!
ﺣﺠﺮﺍﻻﺳﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﻣﺴﺢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻛﻦ ﻳﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺮ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻱ؟ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻢ ﺩﺍﺩ :ﺭﺳــﻮﻝ ﺧﺪﺍ)ﺹ( ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩ :ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺭﻛﻦ
ﻳﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪﻡ ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ)ﻉ( ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﻲ ﺟﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ» :ﻣﺎ ﺃﺗﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺮﻛﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﺎﻧﻲ
ﺇﻻ ﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﺟﺒﺮﺋﻴﻞ ﻗﺪ ﺳﺒﻘﻨﻲ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻳﻠﺘﺰﻣﻪ) «.ﻫﻤﺎﻥ (419/9
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻧﮕــﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻴﺖﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﺍﻡ ،ﺣﻀــﺮﺕ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ)ﻉ(
ﺑﻪﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﺟﺒﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﻣﺎﻳﻪ ،ﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﻛﻌﺒﻪ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ)ﻉ(ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩ:ﺗﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲﻛﻪﻛﻌﺒﻪﺑﺮﭘﺎﺳﺖ،ﺩﻳﻦﻧﻴﺰﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﺍﺳﺖ:
»ﻻﻳﺰﺍﻝﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦﻗﺎﺋﻤﺎﻣﺎﻗﺎﻣﺖﺍﻟﻜﻌﺒﻪ)«.ﻭﺳﺎﺋﻞﺍﻟﺸﻴﻌﻪ(14/8
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﻌﺒﻪ ،ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺮﺍﺏ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻬﺪﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻛﻌﺒﻪ ،ﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﻣﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺮگ ﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺩ .ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺁﻳﻪ
ﺷــﺮﻳﻔﻪ »ﺟﻌﻞ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻜﻌﺒﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﺍﻡ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﺎ ﻟﻠﻨﺎﺱ« ﻣﺎﺋﺪﻩ97/
ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻣﻔﺎﺩﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻌﺒﻪ ـ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻮﺍﻑ
ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﺣﺞ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﻚ ﺁﻥ ﻭ
ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ـ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﻭ ﻣﻬﺠﻮﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻥ ﻛﻌﺒﻪ ـ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻃﻮﺍﻑ ﺑــﺮ ﮔﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ
ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ ـ
ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻗﻌﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﻊ ﻫﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺷــﻤﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ:
»ﻟ ِﻴﻬﻠﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻠﻚ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻳﺤﻴﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ« ﺍﻧﻔﺎﻝ.42/
ﻛﻌﺒﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﺘﻮﻥ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻥ
ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺷــﺘﺎﺏ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻐﻔﺮﺕ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻼﻣﺖ
ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﺘﻮﻥ ﻓﻘﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﺳﻴﻄﺮﻩ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻜﻔﻮﺭﺕ
ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﺪ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﮕﻞ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ
ﺗﺎ ﻭﺑﺮ ﻭ ﻫﺎﺑﺮﻣﺎﺱ ،ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺳـﻨﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻰ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻫﻤﺎﻳﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﺘﻲ،
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ
ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ،ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﺎﻧﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ژﺭﻓﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﺎﻥ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﭽﻪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸـﺎﻫﺪﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺑﺎﺳﭙﺎﺱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﻛﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ .ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﺷﻮﻡ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﻋﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺑﻪﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ
ﺣﺎﺻﻞﻧﻮﻋﻲﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ»ﺯﻳﺴﺘﻪ«ﺍﺳﺖ.ﻳﻌﻨﻲﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝﺣﺪﻭﺩﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳﺎﻝ
ﺯﻳﺴﺘﻦﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺍﻗﻠﻴﻢﺍﺳﺖﻭﺗﻤﺎﺱﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺑﺎﻃﻴﻒﻭﺳﻴﻌﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻟﻬﻲﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ .ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮ
ﺑﻜﺸــﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻢ .ﭘﻴﺪﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ
ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ژﻭﺭﻧﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻭ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ،ﻓﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﮔﺬﺭﺍ ﺑﺴــﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻬﺪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺘﺮگ ﻭ
ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ،ﻫﮕﻞ ،ﻧﻴﭽﻪ ،ﻻﻳﺐ ﻧﻴﺘﺰ ،ﻫﻮﺳﺮﻝ ،ﻫﻴﺪﮔﺮ ،ﻣﺎﻛﺲﺷﻠﺮ،
ﺷــﻮﭘﻨﻬﺎﻭﺭ ،ﻓﻴﺨﺘﻪ ،ﺷــﻠﻴﻨﮓ ،ﻫﺮﺩﺭ ،ﻫﺎﺑﺮﻣﺎﺱ ﻭ ﮔﺎﺩﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺷــﻼﻳﺮﻣﺎﺧﺮ ،ﻫﺎﺭﺗﻨﺎﻙ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻝ ﺭﺍﻧﺮ ،ﭘﻞ
ﺗﻴﻠﻴﺦ ،ﺑﻮﻟﺘﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻝ ﺑﺎﺭﺕ ،ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﺯﺍﺭ ،ﺭﺍﺗﺰﻳﻨﮕﺮ )ﺑﻨﺪﻳﻜﺖ ﺷﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ
ﭘــﺎپ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ( ،ﻭﻟﻔﻬﺎﺭﺕ ﭘﺎﻧﻨﺒﺮگ ،ﺍﺗﻮ ،ﻫﺘــﺰ ،ﺍﺑﻠﻴﻨﮓ ،ﻳﻮﻧﮕﻞ ،ﺍﺩﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺷﻴﻠﺒﻴﻜﺲ ،ﻫﻴﺮﺵ ،ﮔﻮﮔﺎﺭﺗﻦ ،ﺩﻳﺘﺮﻳﺶ ﺑﻮﻧﻬﺎﻓﺮ ،ﻓﻮﺧﺲ ،ﭘﻞﻓﺎﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ،ﻣﻮﻟﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻫﺎﻧﺲ ﻛﻮﻧﮓ ،ﻳﻮﺁﺧﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﺥ ﻭ ﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ
ﻭ ﺗﺌﻮﻟﻮگ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺳﻼﻡﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﻭﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﻦﭘﮋﻭﻫﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺟﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳــﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺸــﺎ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻭ
ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻧﺒﺮﻳﻢ ﻛــﻪ ﻓﺮﻳﺪﺭﻳﺶ ﻣﺎﻛﺲ ﻣﻮﻟﺮ
ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﻧــﺶ ﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳــﻚ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥﺗﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻘﻴﻢ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺩﻩﻫﺎ
ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮ ﭘﺮﺁﻭﺍﺯﻩ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺳﻴﻄﺮﻩ ﻧﺎﺯﻳﺴﻢ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ
ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﮔﺮﻳﺨﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺭﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﻭﻡ ،ﻫﺮﺑﺮﺕ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯ،
ﺍﺭﻧﺴــﺖ ﻛﺎﺳــﻴﺮﺭ ،ﺩﻭﺭﻭﺛﻲ ﺯﻭﺋﻠﻪ )ﻳﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﻭﺗﻲ ﺳــﻮﻝ( ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻲﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺯﺍﻧﮕﺎﻥ ،ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ،ﺍﺩﻳﺒﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻋﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻓﻼﺳﻔﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻦﭘﮋﻭﻫﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ژﺭﻑﻧﮕﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﺁﻭﺍﺯﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻜﻔﻮﺭﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺴﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺁﻥ
ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻫﻮﺭﻛﻬﺎﻳﻤﺮ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻭﺭﻧﻮ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺟﺴــﺘﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺁﻥ
ﻳﻮﺭﮔﻦﻫﺎﺑﺮﻣﺎﺱ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ ،ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻧﻲﻣﺂﺏ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﻣﺎﺑﻌﺪﺍﻟﻄﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻓﻼﻃﻮﻥ
ﻭ ﺍﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﭘﺴﺖﻣﺪﺭﻥ ،ﺍﮔﺰﻳﺴﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ ﻓﻨﻮﻣﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﻭ ﻫﺮﻣﻨﻮﺗﻴﻚ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ،
ﺍﭘﻴﺴﺘﻤﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ،ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﭘﮋﻭﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺘﻲ
ﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺳﺘﮕﺎﻫﺶ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻮﻝ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻝ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﺪﺭﻳﺶ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺲ ،ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥﺗﺒﺎﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣــﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻲﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ
ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎ »ﮔﺴﺴﺖ«
ﻭ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺻﻒ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺴــﺖ ﻣــﺪﺭﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﻱ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻜﻔﻮﺭﺕ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﻭﺍﺝ
ﻭﺭﻭﻧﻖﺩﺍﺭﺩﺍﺯﺟﻤﻠﻪﻫﺮﻣﻨﻮﺗﻴﻚ،ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲﻭﺍﮔﺰﻳﺴﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ.
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱﻋﻠﻢﻭﺍﭘﻴﺴﺘﻤﻮﻟﻮژﻱﻧﻴﺰﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥﺭﻭﺍﺝﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.ﺍﻣﺎﺩﻭﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻲ ﺳﻴﻄﺮﻩ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ :ﻳﻜﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﭘﺴﺖﻣﺪﺭﻥ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻳﻮﺭﮔﻦﻫﺎﺑﺮﻣﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ
ﻫﺮﻣﻨﻮﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻫﺮﻣﻨﻮﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﺩﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﺭﺯﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ.
ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻴﻚ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ – ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ
ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻓﻴﻊﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻠﻴﺴﺎﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻛﻠﻴﺴﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ .ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﺘﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ.
ﭘﺮﺳـﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺜﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ »ﻣﺴﻴﺢﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ« ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ
ﻋﻴﺴﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ؛ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻭ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ
»ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺸــﺮﻱ« ،ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ،ﺣﺠﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ )ﺍﻧﺠﻴﻞ( ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ،ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻳــﻦ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ،ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ،ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻦ ،ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ،ﻓﻤﻨﻴﺴﻢ ،ﺳﻜﻮﻻﺭﻳﺰﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ،ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ،
ﻣﺮگ ،ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ،ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ،ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ
ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺷﻌﺮ ،ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﺘﺄﻟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﻴـﺖ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ
ﻣﺘﺄﻟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻧﻬﺎﻓﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺎﻧﺲ ﻛﻮﻧﮓ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ
ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻓﻮﻝ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻭﺳــﻴﻊ ،ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺠﺎﻝ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕﻫﺎ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺳﻴﻄﺮﻩ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﻲﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻋﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺂﻻ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﺣﺘﻲﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲﺍﻧﺴﺪﺍﺩﻭﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉﺗﻌﻠﻖﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎ
ﺑﺨﺼﻮﺹﻧﺴﻞﺟﻮﺍﻥﺍﺯﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ،ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲﺧﺴﺘﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻌﺮ ،ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ،ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻜﺮﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ،ﺗﻨﺎﺳــﺨﻲ ،ﻃﺎﻟﻊﺑﻴﻨﻲ ،ﻛﻒﺑﻴﻨﻲ ،ﻳﻮﮔﺎ،
ﺷﻤﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ ،ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺴﻢ ،ﻫﻴﭙﻨﻮﺗﻴﺴﻢ ،ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﻭ ...
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ .ﺣﺠﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪﻫﺎ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺣﻴﺮﺕﺁﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﺷــﻮ ،ﻛﺮﻳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻮﺭﺗﻲ ،ﺩﺍﻻﻳﻲ ﻻﻣﺎ ،ﺳــﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺑﺎ ،ﺗﻴﭻﻫﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻛﻨﻜﺎﺭ،
ﻛﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﺭﻭﺕ ﻓﺮﻗﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥﻣﺂﺏ »ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﻳﺪ« )( NewAge
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷﻲﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕﻫﺎﻳﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺎﻧﺲ ﻛﻮﻧﮓ
ﺑﺤﺜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ،ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻟﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ »ﺩﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ« )ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩﺵ ﻛﻠﻴﺴﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ(ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖﻭﻟﻲﺩﺭﻋﻮﺽﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺖ)(Spintualityﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
91
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻱ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ
ِ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ ﺗﺒﺎﺭ
ﻃﻲ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺗﺎﺯﮔﻲ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ
ﻧﺸﺴﺖ »ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﺩﺭﺱﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻣﺪﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ
»ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻨــﻰ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻭ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﻧﺪ «.ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﻋﻠﻰﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ »ﺩﺭﺱﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ« ﺩﺭ ﺧﻼﻝ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻭﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲﺍﺵ »ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺁﻥ« ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻰ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ،ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ،ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺷــﺮ ،ﺍﺩﻟﻪ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻭ ...ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺳــﻨﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ،ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳــﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ«.
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻰﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻭﻳﻠﻴﺎﻡ ﭘﻰﺁﻟﺴﺘﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ
ﺩﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻰﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ
ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣــﺪﺭﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤــﺚ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻌﻨــﺎﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ
ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ،ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ،ﭘﺮﺳﺸــﻰ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳــﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﺶ »ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﻭﻳﻦ« ﻭ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ
»ﭘﻮﺯﻳﺘﻴﻮﻳﺴــﻢ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ« ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻰﮔــﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺳــﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ
ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺁﻏــﺎﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﻮﻃﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﺴــﻮﻓﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳــﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ »ﺳــﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘــﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﺪ«
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻓﻠﻮﻃﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺣﺪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ،
ﺍﺩﺭﺍﻙﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﺎﻥﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺴــﺘﻠﺰﻡ
ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻲﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ
ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺫﺍﺗﺎ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﻳﻨﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
92
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ »ﺧﺪﺍ« ﺑﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺩ .ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﺑﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ
ﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ
ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ
ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻓﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺖﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ
ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﻯ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻮﺿــﻮﻉ »ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑــﺮﺩﻯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺖﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ
ﺩﻳﻨﻰ« ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ .ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺖﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﻯ )ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻗﻰ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻯ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻗﻄﻊ
ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻗﻰ( ﺩﺭ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻗﻰ،
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺎﻣﻰ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺫﻫــﻦ ﻣﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺗﺤﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻗﻄﻊ
ﺻﺪﻗﻰ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺯﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻝ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻥﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ «.ﻭﻯ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺖﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻯ ،ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻳﻚ ﻟﻔﻆ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺟﺰ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ
ﻟﻔﻆ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ،ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ،
ﭘﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ «.ﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻯ ﻧﺎﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﻰﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ،
ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﻳﻚ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ«.
ﻭﻳﺘﮕﻨﺸــﺘﺎﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺷــﺒﺎﻫﺖ
ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﮔﻰ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ
ﻟﻔﻆ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﻤﻴــﻢ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺁﻥ ﺗﺴــﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﻚ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻰ ﺁﻥ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ ،ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﻟﻔﻆ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﺫﺍﺗﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻰ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻭﻳﺘﮕﻨﺸﺘﺎﻳﻦ
ﺳﻮﻣﻴﻦ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻗﺎﺳﻢ ﭘﻮﺭﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ »ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ؛ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ
ﺩﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻭﻳﺘﮕﻨﺸﺘﺎﻳﻦ
ﻣﺘﺎﺧﺮ«ﺑﻪﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩﺳﺨﻦﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ.ﺩﻛﺘﺮﭘﻮﺭﺣﺴﻦﺩﺭﺁﻏﺎﺯﺳﺨﻦﺑﺎﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻳﺘﮕﻨﺸﺘﺎﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ »ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭ«» ،ﺑﻰﻣﻌﻨﺎ« ﻭ
»ﻣﻬﻤﻞ«ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻣﻰﺟﻮﻳﺪ،ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ»:ﺗﺎﭘﻴﺶﺍﺯﻭﻳﺘﮕﻨﺸﺘﺎﻳﻦﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﻰﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺳﻪ
ﻣﺪﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﺳﻠﺒﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﻼﻃﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﻟﻴﺮﺭﻭﺱ ﻭ ﺗﻴﻤﺎﺋﻮﺱ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺖ
ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻓﻠﻮﻃﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺳﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ .ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ
ﻣﺪﻝ ،ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﻟﻔﻈﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﺳﻠﺒﻰ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻛﻮﺋﻴﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ،ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻤﺜﻴﻠﻰ
)ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ( ﺁﻛﻮﺋﻴﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺳﺪﻩ ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺴــﻠﻂ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ .ﺩﻛﺘﺮﭘﻮﺭﺣﺴــﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺳﻪ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﭘﻮﺯﻳﺘﻴﻮﻳﺴــﻢ ﻣﻨﻄﻘــﻰ ،ﺍﺑﻄﺎﻝﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯ ﻭ
ﻣﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﭘﻮﺯﻳﺘﻴﻮﻳﺴــﻢ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﻭﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻭﻳﺘﮕﻨﺸﺘﺎﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﺘﺎﺗﻮﺱ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻣﻚ ﺗﺎﮔﺮﺕ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﻟﻰ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻫﻴﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺎﺳــﺖ.
ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ،ﺍﺑﻄﺎﻝﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺭﻳﻚ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﺬﺏ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﻮﻁ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﺑﻄﺎﻝﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯ ﺳﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻭﻳﺘﮕﻨﺸﺘﺎﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺮﺍﻛﺘﺎﺗﻮﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺻﺪﻕ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﻛﺬﺏ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻣــﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﺑﺎﻧــﻰ ﻭ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻭﻳﺘﮕﻨﺸــﺘﺎﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻧﻰ
)ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻰ( ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺑــﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ،ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﺶ
ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ «.ﺍﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ،ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻟﺬﺍ »ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻭ ﺻﻮﺭ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﻰﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ.
ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻭﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻣﻨﺪﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ«.
ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻰ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎ ﻧﺮﺳﺴﻴﺎﻧﺲ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻣــﺎ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎ ،ﺗﺒﻌﻴﻀــﺎﺕ ،ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺳﺘﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﺴــﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺳﺮﻣﻨﺸــﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﺴــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺍ ُﺑﮋﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺮﻙ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳــﻢ ،ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﺮﺑﺮﺕ ﻣﻴﺪ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ.
ﺻﺮﻓﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺘﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﺴﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻯ
ﺟﻨﺴــﻴﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔــﻰ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪﺍﻧــﺪ .ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺭﻭﺣﻰ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷــﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ،
ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ ،ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﺗﻔﺮﻳﺤﺎﺕ،
ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪﻣﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺯﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻣﻰﻳﺎﺑﺪ،
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﻭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍ ُﺑﮋﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺮﻙ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﺮ
ﻣﺤﺮﻛﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﺎ ﻣﺤﺮﻙ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﺍ ُﺑﮋﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍ ُﺑﮋﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻭﺳﻴﻌﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩ؛ ﺍ ُﺑﮋﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺷﻰء ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﻰ objectﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺤﺮﻛﻰ ﻣﻌﻨﻰﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍ ُﺑﮋﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ
ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍ ُﺑﮋﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻜﺲﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ،
ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻯ ﺟﻨﺴــﻴﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺤــﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑــﻊ ﻣﺎﺩﻯ ،ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻨﻈــﻮﺭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾ
ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﻧﻮﻉ ﺷﻐﻞ ،ﺩﻳﻦ ،ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻼﺕ ،ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻦ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷــﻮﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ،
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ،
ﺍ ِﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ،ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻭﺧﺘﻦ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﭘﺎﺩﺍﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺧﻠﻖ
ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻰ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ،ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ
ﺣﺮﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺗﻜﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﻑ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﺑﻰﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻯ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ »ﻋﺎﻃﻔﻪ« ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺫﻫﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻣﺒﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
ﻣﺸﺎﻏﻞ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﺎﻃﻔﻰ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﻗﻮﻯ
ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻏﻤﮕﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ،
ﺗﺮﺳﻮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ،ﺩﻝﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻀﻄﺮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺰﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻣﻐﺮﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ،ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻤﻰ )ﻣﺘﻌﺮﺽ(
ﺑــﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺣﺮﻣﺘﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟــﺰﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻰ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؛ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ،ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ
ﺿﻌﻴــﻒ ،ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺷــﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ،ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺑﻪﻧﻔﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺒــﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ
ﻛﺴﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺭﺳﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺗﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺑﻘﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎﻳﻰﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ »ﺗــﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎ« ) (role balancingﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﻗﻮﻯ
ﺑﻬﺎﻧــﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﻪﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳــﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺯﻧــﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ
ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﺶ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖ
ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻋﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺳــﺘﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺘــﻰ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﺁﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺩﻫﻰ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻭ
ﺧﺪﻣــﺎﺕ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﺎﻧــﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻨﺠﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺮ ﻭ
ﻋﻄﻮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻫﺎ ،ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ،ﺩﻳﻦ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺯﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﮔﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ،
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﺰﺍ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻣﻰ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ
ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻰﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻰ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ،ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪﻣﺮﺍﺗﺒﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ
ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺑﺸــﺮﻯ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ،ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ،ﺧﻨﺜﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﻋﻜﺲﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺲ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗــﻊ ،ﺟﻨﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻳﻚ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ،
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ،ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺮﻙﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻳﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ،ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍ ُﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ،ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺣﺴﺐ
ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎ،
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺲﻫﺎ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻘﻄﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻌﻨﻰﺩﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﺷــﺪ» .ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ« ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ،
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺁﻥ،
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭﻭﻥﻓﻜﻨﻰ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻰ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﺿﺤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﭘﻮﻳﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑــﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻨﺶ ،ﭘﺎﺳــﺦﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻰ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ،ﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻓــﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ) ( Meﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﻣﻔﻌﻮﻟﻰ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﻄﻪﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺧﻠــﻖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ،ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺟﺰﺋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺶ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻘﻄﻪﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺩﻫﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ Meﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﻣﺮﺍ«
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ،ﻋﻨﺼﺮﻯ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﻳﻰ
ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻋﻨﺼﺮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻮﻳﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭﺍﻣﻰﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺁﺯﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭﺱ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ،
ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﺎﻛﺶ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻘﺎﻳﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻨﺸﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍ َﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳــﺖ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻠﺖ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻋﺎﻳــﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺯﻳــﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ،ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻛــﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ.
93
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻟﻄﻒ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺣﻖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺁﺳــﻴﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﭘﻴﺮﻯ ،ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗــﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻌﻴﺸــﺘﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ،ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ،ﺣﺲ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺎﻭﻧﺪﻯ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻴﻠﻪﺍﻯ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﻴﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻋﺼﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺟﻮﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻛﻤﻚ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺣﻖ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻛﻢ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﺮﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻤﺎژﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ
ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
»ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻴــﺖ« ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺎﻩﻛﻠﻴﺪﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻗﻔﻞﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﭘﻴﭽﻴــﺪﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻜﻰﻳﻜــﻰ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳــﻴﺮ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻨﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺳــﻊ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻫﺒﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﻣﻌﺠﺰﻩ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭ ﻣﻲﻧﻬﺪ» :ﻛﻠﻴﺖ«
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﺘﺎﺧﺮ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻻﺕ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺸــﺮ ﭘﺮﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘــﺖ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰ ﺷــﺪﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻟﺠﺎﻡﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻧﺒﻮﻩ
ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﭘﺎﺭﻩ »ﺩﺍﺭﺍ« ﻭ »ﻧﺪﺍﺭ« ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ
ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻝ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻧﺎﻋﺎﺩﻻﻧﻪ
ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
94
ﺿــﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺣﺘﻤﻲﺑﺸــﺮ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺳــﺎﺯﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ،ﻃﻐﻴﺎﻥﻫﺎ ،ﻧﺎﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﺵﻫﺎ،
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭘﻴﻜﺮﻩ ﻣﺴــﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﺎﻧﻰ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺯﺍﺋﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻰﺟﻬﺖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻫﻪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺍﻧﻮ ﺩﺭﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ
ﻭ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ
ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﺮﺩﻡ ﻓﺰﺍﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻫﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ
ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩﺍﻟﻤﻌﺎﺭﻓﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
»ﺑﻴﺴــﻤﺎﺭﻙ« ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺠﺮﻯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻯ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﺎﺩ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺒﺪﺍ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﭼﺸﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺳﺮﺍﺳــﺮ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺴــﺎﺭﺕ ﺣﻴﻦ
ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺰﺍﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ،ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺳﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ 1917ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻛﺘﺒﺮ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻧﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ 1917ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ
ﺁﻣﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺗﻔﻠﺴــﻒ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘــﺎﻡ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺤﻖ
ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺗﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﭼﭗ ،ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺧﻄﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻭ
ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﻏﻠﺘﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻥ ﺷﺒﺢ
ﻭﺣﺸﺖ ﺁﻭﺭ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ،ﺣﺎﻻ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻯ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻫﻪ 30
ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻟﺮﺯﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ،ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ 1935ﺭﻭﺯﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴــﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺗﻼﺷﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺠﻮﻡ
ﺩﻡﺍﻓــﺰﺍﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1941ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺳــﻴﻊ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﻩ ﭼﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻭﻳﻠﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺭﻳﭻ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﭘﻴﺮﻭ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ
ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻃﺮﺣــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴــﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ،
ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧــﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﺤﺖ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻴﺖ ،ﺍﺻﻞ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮﻯ،
ﺍﺻﻞ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷــﺪ.
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮﻯ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻞﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺪﻝ
ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻠﺰﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻼﻝ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ
ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿــﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﻘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻬﻮ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭼﺸﻢﭘﻮﺷﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻟﻄﻒ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺣﻖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻭ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮﻯ
ﺍﺳــﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻰﺷﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻔﺎﺩ ﻧﮕﺎﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺟﺴﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺰﻭﻧﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺣﻖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺟﻠﻮﻩﮔﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺭﺍﻩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﺮﻭﻃﻰ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺷﻤﺎﺭﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴﻪ
ﻓﻴﻼﺩﻟﻔﻴﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1944ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻖ
ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﻠﻞﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒــﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸــﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣــﻖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸــﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺧﺪﺷﻪﺩﺍﺭ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﻛﺮﺍﻣﺖ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺁﻥ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﻴﺜﺎﻕ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ
ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺷــﺪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﺗﻮ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ:
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺣﻘﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺍﻣﺖ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺘﻰ )ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ( ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺘﻰ )ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻰ( ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ :ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ،ﺍﺻﻞ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮﻯ.
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﻀــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺯﻧــﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ،
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ...ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﺪﻯﺗﺮﻯ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻠﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑــﻊ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣــﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺮﺗﻜﺐ ﻧﻘﺾ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺳﻮﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ
ﻳﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﺕ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻋﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ،
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻰﺷﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ،1357ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ،ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺣﻘﻰ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻰ
ﻭ ﺗﺤﻘــﻖ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ) .ﺍﺻــﻞ .(29ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫــﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺷــﺪ؛ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﺗﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﻰ ﻟﺸﻜﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ
ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﺗﻰ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﺰﻳﺴﺘﻰ ،ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ ،ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯﺍﻥ.
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ،
ﻫﺮﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺷــﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﺸــﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴــﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻠــﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻯﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ
ﺫﻯﺭﺑﻂ ،ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﭼﻬﻞ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ »ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ« ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺰﻳﺴﺘﻰ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺑــﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣــﺎﺕ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨــﻪ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺮ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻃﻰ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ژﺭﻑ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ )ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ( ،ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻭ
ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻨﮕﻨﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻭ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺷﺘﺎﺑﺰﺩﻩ،
ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 40ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ،ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺗﺎ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﻋﺪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﮔﺮﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﺸﺎﻳﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1383ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺣﻖ
ﺑــﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺳــﺮﻟﻮﺣﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ )ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ( ،ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺗﻮﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻰ )ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﺕ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ( ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ،ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺒﺨﺸــﻰ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﺸــﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ .ﻧﻜﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺣﻘﻰ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ:
ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻣﻲﺭﻓــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﺎﻣــﻊ ﻣﻲﻧﺎﻣﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺘﺮ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﻭﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﺕﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﺨﺼﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪﺍﻯ
ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺋﻬﻴﭻ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻣﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺴــﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﺰﺍﻳﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻖ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻧﺸﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯﻫﺎ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺍﻓﺖ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ) .ﻗﺎﺑﻞ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ(.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ،
ﻃﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﻭ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻓﻘــﺮ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻮﺛﺮﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﮔﻮﻳﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻳﻚ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ
ﻛﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﭼﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑــﺎ ﻣﺎﺩﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻠﻰ
ﺑﻰﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻠﺰﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻯ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ،
ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ،ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺤﻖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻤﻪﻭﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻰﻫﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ
ﺑﺤﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﻘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻻﺯﻣﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﻣﺖ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻧﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺍﻋﺎﻧﻪ،
ﻧﻴﻜﻮﻛﺎﺭﻯ ،ﻟﻄﻒ ،ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻫﺮﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺳﺘﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺮﻭﺻﺪﺍﻯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻟﺮﺯﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺁﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟
95
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ
ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ
ﻻﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﮔﻮﺳــﺖ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻯ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﺪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ
ﻧﻤﻰﮔﺬﺭﺩ .ﻛﻤﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﺪﻣﺖ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ
ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻴﺮ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺁﺷــﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﺨﺸــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻮﭘﺎ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻳﻜﺴــﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻯ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸــﺎﺑﻪ ،ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻣﻜﺘﺐﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﺸــﺎﺑﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ
ﺭﻭﺳﻰ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻯ ﺷــﻮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﻣﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺧﺎﺹ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ.
ﺑﻰﺷﻚ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ
ﻋﻤﺮﻯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳــﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻓﻼﻃﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺳﻄﻮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻓﻼﻃﻮﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻤﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺳﻄﻮ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻴﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ
ﺍﻓــﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﻥﻫــﺎﻯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺷــﻜﻞ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢﺗﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺻﺮﻓﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺛﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ،ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﻮﺳﺖ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻭ
ﺑﻄﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﻣﻰﻧﺎﻣﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﮔﻮﺳﺖ ﻛﻨﺖ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺳﻤﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ،
96
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺛﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﻮﺳــﺖ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩ،
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻛﻬﻦ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ،ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻟﺘﺮﻧﺎﺗﻴﻮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺷﺪﻥ ،ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1789ﻳﻚ ﺭﺷــﺘﻪ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﺘﺮگ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﮔــﺬﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻧﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻔﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﺷﻮﺏ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻭ ﺑﻰﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﺱ ﻭ ﺩﻟﻬﺮﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ .ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﺳﻄﺎ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝﺗﺮ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭﻙ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺣﻞ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻌﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﺨﻮﺵ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺷــﮕﺮﻑ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﻮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭﻳﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﺩﻣﻮﻧــﺪ ﺑﺮﻙ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧــﻼﻑ ﺁﻥ ﻋﻤــﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺘﻲ
ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﻧﻤﻰﺗﺎﺑﻴﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺍﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﺭﻭﭘــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺭﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺎﺣﺼﻞ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺍﺳــﺘﺤﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺑﻰﺷﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ.
ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ
ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻔﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻔﻜــﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺣﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻏﻠﺒــﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ
ﺭﻓﻊ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺿﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ،
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﻯ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠــﻪ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺮ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻛﻮﺷــﺶ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺿﺎﺕ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺩ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻗﺒﻼ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻴﭻ ﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮﺍﺱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺮﺱ،
ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﻧﻮﻳﻨﻰ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺸﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺭﺷﺪ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﻄــﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻪﻃــﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻭﺍﻻ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﺷﺪ .ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺸﻒ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺷﺘﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ
ﻣﻰﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻛﻴﻢ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻭﺑﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﺨﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﻭ ﺍﺛﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺮ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﺨﺸــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﮔﺮ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ
ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ 1789ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ
ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛــﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻔﻰ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻟﻰ ﺧﺎﺹ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳــﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺮﺩ
ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﻯ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻫﺎ ،ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺒﻼ ﻧﻴﺰ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍژﻩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﻯ ﺟﺴﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﮔﻮﺳﺖ ﻛﻨﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﻭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻭ ﭘﻮﺯﻳﺘﻴﻮﻳﺴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺑﻰﭼﻮﻥ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺩ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ
ﻭ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﻯ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻰﺁﻳــﺪ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻜﻔﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﻢ
ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻮﺷﺶ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟــﻪ ﺑﻪﺷــﺮﺣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑــﺎﻻ ﺭﻓــﺖ ،ﻣﻰﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻛﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻰﺷــﻚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ
ﺑﺮﺫﻫﻦ ﻫﺮ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸــﮕﺮ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺛﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻛﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺸﻰ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺷﺎﺧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻓﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻯ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ؛ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻰﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﺸــﺮﻳﺖ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﺭﺳﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺧﺼﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈــﺮﻯ ﻳﺎ ﻛﻴﻔﻰ )ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻰ( ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ ﻭ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴــﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺭﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﻣﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ
ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻮﻣﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ
ﺑﻪﻃــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺑﻌﻀــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻏﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﻗﻠﻢﻓﺮﺳﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪﻯ
ﻋﺮﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻧــﺎﻡ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺮﺣﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻦﺧﻠــﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﻥ
14ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ 300ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﺴﻜﻴﻮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻮ ﻭ
500ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﮔﻮﺳــﺖ ﻛﻨﺖ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﻣــﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺑﻦﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻰ ﻭ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮﻯ
ﻋﻠﻞ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨــﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻰ
ﻭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻰﺟﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺑﺸﺮﻳﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻭ
ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻭﻯ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻋﻠﻤﻰﺗﺮﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﺑﻦﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﺱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ
ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﻴﻔﻜﻨﻴﻢ.
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺳﻴﺪﻳﺤﻴﻰ ﻳﺜﺮﺑﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻲ
ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ
ﻣﻨﻴﺮﻩ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺗﻨﻰ
ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛـﻪ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴـﻔﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺷـﺨﺼﻴﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻰ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴـﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻠﻮﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﺸـﻮﻕ ﻓﺮﺍ
ﻣﻰﺭﺳـﺪ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﻭﺻﻒﻧﺎﺷﺪﻧﻰ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺷﻌﺎﺭﻯ
ﺑﺲ ﻟﻄﻴﻒ ﻣﻰﺭﻳـﺰﺩ ،ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺩﺷـﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺴـﺒﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺖ ﺑﻪﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺳﻴﺪﻳﺤﻴﻰ ﻳﺜﺮﺑﻰ ﺭﻓﺘﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭﺑـﺎﺭﻩ ﺷـﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔـﻮ ﻛﻨـﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻳﺜﺮﺑﻰ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻮﺷـﻴﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﭘﻴﺸـﺘﺎﺯ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺭﻧﮓ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻣﻔﺴﺮ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺷـﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴﻚ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻯﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﺷــﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻓﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ
ﺧﺮﺍﺏ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺷﺎﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻋﺎﺭﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺧﺼﻮﺻــﻰﺍﺵ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻋﺎﺭﻑ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﻓــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳـﺪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ
ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﺳــﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻰ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﭼﺎپ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻰ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﺁﺛــﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻟﻤﻴــﺰﺍﻥ ،ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ،ﺑﺪﺍﻳﻪﺍﻟﺤﻜﻤﻪ ﻭ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻟﺤﻜﻤﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮﺍﻟﻤﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ،
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﻨﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ
ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺧﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﺪﺭﺱ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ...
ﺑﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫــﻢ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ ،ﭼــﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻘــﻮﻕ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺘﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘــﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣــﻦ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺗﺪﺭﻳــﺲ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ
ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻯ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻢ .ﻋﻼﻣــﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺝ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻯ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺷﻔﺎﻯ ﺍﺑﻦﺳﻴﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ
ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺸـﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺷـﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺗﺮ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻤﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
97
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﻴــﻦ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛــﺎﺭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰ ﭘﺎﻭﺭﻗﻰ ﻳﺎ
ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻧﻮﻳﺴﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻫﺮﻛﺲ ﺭﻭﺵ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﻘﺎﻫﻰ
ﻧﻜﻨﻨــﺪ ،ﻣﺮﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻭﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﺳﻔﺎﺭﺷــﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳـﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﻣﻦ ،ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴـﺘﻴﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎﻳﻠﻢ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﭘﺎﺳـﺦ ﺩﻫﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻰ ﻭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﭘﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻜﻤﻞ
ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺑﻄﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﺧﻠﻂ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﻭﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻯ ،ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻋﺮﻓﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﻤﻠــﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﺧﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺳــﺨﻦ
ﺳﺮ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻯ
ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﺘﻰ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ؟
ﺩﻟﻴﻠﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﻧﺎﻥﻣﺤﻮﺭ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﻭ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺁﻥ
ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﺳﺨﻨﻰ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺒﺲ ،ﺷﻬﺮﺿﺎ،
ﺍﺭﺩﺑﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﺏ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﭘﺲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺟﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻢ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﺎﺗﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺣﻜﻤﺖ ﻭ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺴﻦ ﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﻴﺪ،
ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻡ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺩ ﺟﺴﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ! ﻣﻦ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﺑﻠﻪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﻳﺪ ،ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ
ﭼﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻃﺮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺗﺎﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺗﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒﺷﻤﺎﺍﺯﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢﺗﺎﺣﺪﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺷﺪ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺳـﻮء ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ .ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺮﻓﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭ ﺳـﺨﻴﻒ
ﻣﻰﺷـﻤﺎﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻟﻮﻯ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻴﺎﻥ
ﭼﻮﺑﻴـﻦﺑﻮﺩ،ﭘﺎﻯ ﭼﻮﺑﻴﻦ ﺳـﺨﺖ ﺑﻰﺗﻤﻜﻴﻦ ﺑـﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ
ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻰﻛﻪﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯﻫﺮﺩﻭﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪﻭﻟﻮﻳﻜﻰﺩﺭﺧﻠﻮﺕ
ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻼءﻋﺎﻡ ،ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭﻋﻘﻞﺩﺭﻧﻈﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥﭼﻪﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰﺩﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪﺫﻛﺮﻛﻨﻢ.ﻋﻘﻞﻣﺜﻞﺩﻳﺪﻥﻭﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥﺍﺳﺖ،ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥﮔﻔﺖﻛﺪﺍﻡ
ﺩﻳﺪﻥ! ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ
ﻋﻘﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﮔﻨﺠﺸﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺘﺮ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻋﻘﻞ
ﻗﻮﻩ ﺍﺩﺭﺍﻛﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻋﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻘﻞ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﻨﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﻪﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﺩﺑﺎﻳﺪﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢﻣﺤﺾﺑﺎﺷﺪﻭﻋﻘﻞﺭﺍﻛﻨﺎﺭﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩﻣﺜﻞﻣﺮﺩﻩﺩﺭﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﻣﺮﺩﻩﺷﻮﺭ .ﺍﮔﺮﺍﻣﺸﺐﻣﻦﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﻮﺩﻭﻓﻨﺎ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻡ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰﺍﺯﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰﺧﻮﺩﻡ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻢ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰﺑﻪﻋﻘﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻭﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝﺑﻪﻏﻴﺮﻫﻢﻧﻴﺴﺖ.ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺁﻧﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ
ﻋﻘﻞ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﭘﺮﺳــﺶ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ.
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﻓﺎ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺻﻼﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦﻧﻴﺴﺖ.ﺩﺭﺣﻮﺯﻩﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥﻋﻘﻞﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﺍﺳﺖﻭﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥﺑﺎ
ﺁﻥﺑﻪﻓﻨﺎﻯﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰﺭﺳﻴﺪ.ﭘﺲﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥﺑﻪﺯﻭﺭﮔﻔﺖﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﻢﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﺎﻋﻘﻞﺍﻫﻞﺭﻳﺎﺿﺖﺑﺎﺷﺪ،ﻫﻢﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪﺑﺎﻋﻘﻞﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑﺑﺎﺷﺪ.ﻛﺎﺭﻋﻘﻞ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﮔﻨﺠﺸﻚ
98
ﻭ ﺷــﺘﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻣﻰﻧﻬﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺍﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ
ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺧﻠﻂ ﻧﻤﻰﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺧﻠﻮﺕ ﻋﺎﺭﻑ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﺁﻣﻴﺨﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺷـﺖ ﺳـﻨﺖ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﭙﺮﺳﻢ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻧﻘﺪﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻓﻠﺴـﻔﻪ ،ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ
ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺁﻳﻪ »ﺷــﻬﺮﺍﻟﺮﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻯ «...ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﻛﻠﻰ ﻧﺎﺯﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻧﻰﻣﺂﺏ
ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣــﻼ ﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﺍﺵ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﻗﺪ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻯ ،ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻌﺎﺩ
ﺟﺴﻤﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻋﺎﻗﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ
ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺸـﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺯﻋﻢ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺎﻣﻞﺗﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮﺍﻟﻤﻴﺰﺍﻥ ،ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻰ
ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺍﻓﻖ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﻮﺗﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ
ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺍﺭﺳــﻄﻮﻳﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﻮﺗﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋــﻪ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﺶ ﺍﻓﻖ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺸﻮﺩ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺑﻦﺳﻴﻨﺎ ،ﻣﻼﺻﺪﺭﺍ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﻭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ
ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﻘﻴﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻰ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﻳﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﻢ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻫﻨﻢ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ ،ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺘﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺟﻤﺎﻋﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺮﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭘﻴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﺎﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻧﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﮕﻜﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ؛
ﻛﺴﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﻚ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻗﺪﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ
ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻭﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ.
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻓﻮﺗﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﻫﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺖ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺳﺮﻭﺩﻡ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻣﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ
ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻨﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺷﻴﺦ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ
ﺷــﻴﺦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﺎﻟﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰ ﺳﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻰ ﺳﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻭﻓﺎﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﻭﺩﻡ:
ﻣﻴﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﻡ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﺩﻭﺵ/ﭼﺸــﻢ ﺳﺎﻗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺵ/
ﺣﺸــﻤﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻭﻭﺱ ﻭ ﺟﻢ/ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺎﻩ ﺁﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺘﺸﻢ/ﺑﺎﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻡ ﺣﺮﻳﻔﺎﻥ ﺭﻳﺨﺘﻨﺪ/ﻓﺘﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺘﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻨﺪ/ﻟﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﻡ
ﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻛﻔﻢ/ﭼﺸﻢ ﺑﺮ ﭼﺸﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺻﻨﻢ /ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺡ ﺗﺎ ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ ﻋﻴﺎﻥ /ﺑﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻗﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺳــﻤﺎﻥ/ﺑﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﻒ
ﭼﺸﻢ ﻭﻯ/ﻫﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺶ ﻧﺸﺊ ﺻﺪ ﺟﺎﻡ ﻣﻰ/ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺟﺎﻥ
/ﺩﻭﻟﺘﺶ ﺟﺎﻭﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﺶ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻥ