ماهنامه مثلث شماره 16
ماهنامه مثلث شماره 16
ماهنامه مثلث شماره 16
ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ
ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﭘﺸﻴﻤﺎﻥﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﺮﯾﮑﺎﺍﺳﻼﻣ ﯽ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳ ﯽ
ﺘﺼﺎ ﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥﻭﺁﻣ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻫﺎی
ﺖ ﺍﻗ
ﺑﻄ ﻪ
ﺳﺎﯾﺰ
ﭼﻴﺍ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺭ
ﻫﻤ ﻪ
ﺣﺴﻴ ﻨﻌﻠ ﯽﺷﻬ ﺮﯾﺎﺭ ی
dY{dÁ{ʼZÅÉZ«M
{{ÂÉÁZ»Ê]Y
:ʬWZ§|Ì
]YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
ﮔ ﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﯽ ﺍﺯﻭﺭ ﺷﮑﺴﺘ ﮕﯽﺁ ﺧﺮ ﯾﻦ ﻣﻴﺮ ﺍﺙ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺻﺎﺩ ﻕ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺑﺮﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻥ
ﺗﻨﮓ ﺷﺪ
ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺧﻮﺩﭘﺸﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺭﺳﺎﯾﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩ ﻣﺪﺩی ،ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻣﺤﺒﻴﺎﻥ
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﺁﯾﺖﺍﷲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻠﯽ
ﮐﻼﻡ ،ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺯﯾﺒﺎﮐﻼﻡ،
ﻧﺒﻮی ،ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻣﻠﮑﯽ ،ﻋﻠﯽ ﻣﻄﻬﺮی
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ ﻧﺒﻮی،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ ،ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ ،ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﯽ
ﮐﻔﺎﺷﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻧﺠﻔﻘﻠﯽ ﺣﺒﻴﺒﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺧﺴﺮﻭیﻭﻓﺎ ،ﻋﻠﯽ ﮐﻔﺎﺷﻴﺎﻥ،
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ،ﻋﺒﺎﺱﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﻭﯾﮋﻩﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﯾﻨﯽ
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺟﻌﻠﯽ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﭘﻨﺠﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪیﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ
ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺮﻧﺞﻫﺎی ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺗﯽ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷﺎﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﮐﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎی ﺩﺭﺱ ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ
{ :|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ 29 /ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ 5 /ﻣﻬﺮ 148 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻬﻢ 12 /ﻣﻬﺮ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
]ʸ § ÉZÅÁ Y Ì£ ÊËZÅÁ Z
dY ½ZËY´·ÂY ½M Y Ã|ÀËM
MOSALAS.IR
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
-
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
-
ﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﮐﺎﺭ
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺧﺪﻣﺖ-ﯾﮏ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽ-
ﺷﮑﻮﺭ
ﺍﮐﺒﺮﻧﮋﺍﺩﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﺵ-
ﺟﻤﺸﻴﺪ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻌﻠﯽ
ﺯﺍﻟﯽ-
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ-
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ
ﺗﺮﺍﺑﯽ
-
ﻻﻟﻪ
ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭی
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮﭘﻮﺭ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺭﺿﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﺯﻫﺮﻩ
ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮیﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺧﺒﺎﺯ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭیﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺮﻧﺪی
]Z
ÉZf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺳﻮم
/ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐ
|d·Y
Âm
{»Ìaﺻﻔﺤﻪﺻﻔﺤﻪ4444
{
|Ä¿Zzf·Y
§¥Â¸Ì
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ½Z{Ây88
»¹fv
dY
¿
º¿Zy
Ê^m
]ÉY
§Ä¼Z
:·ÂmMﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﯽ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﺎﺭیﺟﻼﻝ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﯽ
ﻋﻼﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩی
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
-
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﻴﺴﯽ
ﮐﻼﻧﺘﺮی
-
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮیﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¿¼Ê
|¿ÁM
4
5ZË
¿¨
ÌaÉY
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
Ìa
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭم
/
25
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍی
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮﺩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍی
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮﺩ
ÉZ«M
¿¼Ã
ʸ17
-É{Z]M
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ5454
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﯽ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﯽﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ|¾ËYºË
]Z
»ª§Â
^
Z
:É|¿ÂyM
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ʻ3838
»ºÌ¿Z
»fÀ
Ã|ÀËM
»|¼v
:ʼZÅﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.IRﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﻧﻮﺩ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﻧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﺳﺮﯾﺎﻝ
ﻫﺎی
ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻧﯽ
ﺗﻠﻮﯾﺰﯾﻮﻥﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﺳﺮﯾﺎﻝ
ﻫﺎی
ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻧﯽ
ﺗﻠﻮﯾﺰﯾﻮﻥﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﮐﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻴﻂ
ﺯﯾﺴﺖﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﮐﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻴﻂ
ﺯﯾﺴﺖﻫﻤﺴﺮ
ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ؛
ﺍﭘﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ
ﺳﻮﻡ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
؟ﻫﻤﺴﺮ
ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ؛
ﺍﭘﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ
ﺳﻮﻡ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
؟
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﯽ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﯽﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯی
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯی
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﯽ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﯽ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ
ﭘﺎﮐﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ
ﭘﺎﮐﺴﺘﺎﻥﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍی
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻣﺮگﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍی
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻣﺮگ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﮔﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻨﺘﯽﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﮔﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻨﺘﯽ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻬﻢ
ﻭ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻬﻢ
ﻭ
ﺩﻫﻢ
»Ê
Ê»|Ì¿YÂy
{|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
®Ë
]Ã|¿ÁaÃZ´fY{Z
ÉY
{]ÃZ
®Ë
]ÃZ´fY{Zﻋﺎﺩﻝ
ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﯽ
ﭘﻮﺭﻋﺎﺩﻝ
ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﯽ
ﭘﻮﺭﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﻃﺒﺎ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﻃﺒﺎ
ﺩﻻﻭﺭ
ﻧﺠﻔﯽ
،
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻄﻬﺮیﺩﻻﻭﺭ
ﻧﺠﻔﯽ
،
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻄﻬﺮیﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮی،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﯾﻌﻘﻮﺑﯽ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮی،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﯾﻌﻘﻮﺑﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ،
ﺍﺳﺪ
ﺍﷲ
ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻣﭽﻴﺎﻥ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ،
ﺍﺳﺪ
ﺍﷲ
ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻣﭽﻴﺎﻥ
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¯ËÆ
¯ËÆ
¹ZÆ]Y
ÉZÅ
¹ZÆ]Y
ÉZÅ
ﻋﮑﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪی/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻋﮑﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪی/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.IRﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﺮﯾﻤﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﺮﯾﻤﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍی
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎی
ﻣﺨﻔﯽﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍی
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎی
ﻣﺨﻔﯽﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮﺩﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮﺩ44
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩی
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩی
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
|Ì¿YÂyﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﯾﯽﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩی
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩی
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻧﻴﺎﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻧﻴﺎ]Z
ÊËZÅZf¨³
Z]:Y
ÊËZÅZf¨³
Ä¿Z¼³:Y
¿Ê
½Â»YÌa
¯ÄÀÌ]Z
{ºÅ
]|
Y
~̨Àe
Á
¦Ì¸ve
Ä¿Z¼³
¿Ê
½Â»YÌa
¯ÄÀÌ]Z
{ºÅ
]|
Y
~̨Àe
Á
¦Ì¸ve
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﯽ
ﺧﺮﻡﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﯽ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﯽ
ﮐﻼﻧﺘﺮی،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩیﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﯽ
ﮐﻼﻧﺘﺮی،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩی
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪی،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪی
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪی،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪی
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
d¨³
ÉZųÁ
ÃËÁ
»h¸j
]:Z
d¨³
ÉZųÁ
ÃËÁ
»h¸j
]:Z
Ĭ¸u
Ĭ¸u
1212
»ÄËZ
{½YY
{
Á
Äq
»Ê
¯Z¿.|ÀÀ
Äf¨³
ÊËZÅ
Y
ÄÀ˳
cYÁ
{ZY
¿Z
¯º
¸Ê
É{Z]M
Á
»½ZÌ]Yv
Ä^WZ
\¸¬e
{
cZ]Zzf¿Y
½Zf¿Z¤§Y
µZnÀm
]
[Zzf¿Y
ÉYÁ
½
Ê]Ó
½YËÁ
]ÉY
ÉY
Y{Z¼fY
{d·Á
»ÉÂÂ
Ze
{d·Á
É|¼uY
¿{Y
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
¸Ê
»ÊËYÌ
»¾v
Ê»ÔY
-
×Y|
¿ÉÌ
»Z|¼v
¾Ìu
{ɸÅ
-
¸Ê
^ºZ¬·YÂ]YÂbZ
Ê¿Z¼u
-
»É|Æ
½Á|˧©{Z
-|¿ÂÀu
Z|̼u
¯½ZËÂeZ
{Z¼|Ì
-ÊÀÌu
´É
»É{ÁÂ
©{Z
Z^Ë
¯¹Ô
-
^
Z
ÂËY{ÊËZm
«-É^À
Z|̼u
§LÔ³{ÓÂ
»|¼v»Ì
Ê«{Z
-
ÊÌvË
µM
©ZvY
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Y
Äf¨Å½Z»Âe
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
/¹ZÆq
8
ÂËÆ
/1388
/Äv¨100
Êf«Á½Z»Âe1000
Ä¿Z
ÉZÅ
{d·Á
]ÊËZ¼À³
»Ê
¯|ÀÀ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
»-h¸j
{
ÃZe
Y
dÌ «YÁ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
¾Ìu
ÊfËY|Å
-
¸Ê
ÉZ¿Y
»¾v
¿½Z¼Ë
-
»Z|¼v
¿ZÆm
»É|Æ
ʼZÅ
É°e
-
¿}Â
¨Ê Ì
É{ZÅ
»¬|Ê
-
»|¼v
»-ÊÅÔ
wÅZ
üu¾Ì»Y
\Ì°
-
c
×Y
½Z̨ÂË
ºZ¯|Ì
Ê»¯Y
-
{YÂm
¾ËM
»¾v»À
¯¾°ÅÂ
-
Z»Ô£
»^ÊuZ
»¬|¹
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
¿½Z
{
¯ÄÀÌ]Z
-
ÌW
|Ë|m
Á
Ä]Y
½YËY
Á
Z°Ë»M
-
Z¼Ì
{
»½Z
Y
{d·Á
¯Z
Ze
{d·Á
®Ë-d»|y
¿Ä»Z
ÄÌZua
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
ʬÀ̸:|Ì¿YÂy
-ʻZy
°
½Z¼Ìa{Y¿^¯Y
§-Á
|̼m
ÉZ¿Y
^ʸ Z
-Ê·Y
§{Z
»ÊÀ»Â
¸ZÌ
»-[Ânv
¾Ìv»Ô£
×Y¿¹ZÆ·Y
Ê]Ye
-
Ä·Ó
ÉZzf§Y
¶ÌZ¼Y
Ê»Y³
»¬|¹
-
»|¼v
¿ÂaÌ
»Z|¼v
ÊËZ
-
ÃÅ
½ZÌÆ·Y
»Ê^fn
ɯZ
-
»Z|¼v
Z^y
»|¼v
ÉY|¼f Ë
-
¸ZÌ
»¿|É
]Z
ÉZf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Y
Äf¨Å½Z»Âe
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
¹Â
µÁY/
ÂËÆ
/1388
/Äv¨100
ÊÅZ´¿½Z»Âe1000
]Ä
¿|ʳ
»Ê¨»Ì
Ê·Z
¿\
|d·Y
Âm
44Äv¨{»Ìa
{
|Ä¿Zzf·Y
§¥Â¸Ì
¨½Z{Ây88Äv
»¹fv
dY
¿
º¿Zy
Ê^m
]ÉY
§Ä¼Z
Äf¨Å:·ÂmM
[Ây
]Z
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
»h¸j
MOSALAS.IR
ʸ ÀÌu
µÔmÉZËÆ
ÊÌvË
Ã{Y
-
¸Ê
·|Ì
¸Ê
Ê¿Z¼u
-
Z
Ê¿Y{Ë
|¼v»Ì»Ô
Ê«{Z
×Y|Y
´É{ÓÁY
]¾¼Æ
¯ÁZ
-
¾Ìu
¸Ê¼Ì
Z|̼u
Ê«e
-
»ºË
]ÉÁÆ
ÊÌ
¯Éf¿Ô
-
¶ÌZ¼Y
¯ÉiÂ
^
Z
¸Ê¼Ì
¿¼¾Ì
©ZvY
d¨³ÉÌ´¿ZÆm
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¿¼Ê
|¿ÁM
4
5ZË
¿¨
ÌaÉY
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{¹Á
/
25
»{/1388{Y
/Äv¨100
½Z»Z½Z»Âe1000
Ã|¿ÁaÁ
ÉY
]ÉY
¼¸{°
ÉZ«M
¿¼Ã
ʸ17
-É{Z]M
¨54Äv
½Z»Z
¿¹Z
»d¨³Ê|ÀÆ
Á
³
]Z
¾ËYºË|ÌW
]Z
»ª§Â
^
Z
:É|¿ÂyM
¨Äv
ʻ38
»ºÌ¿Z
»fÀ
Ã|ÀËM
»|¼v
Äf¨Å:ʼZÅ
[Ây
]Z
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
»h¸j
{Â]MOSALAS.IR
Á
¿^{Â
¿{Â
]Ê
µZË
ÉZÅ
Ê¿Zf]Ze
Ê]½ÂË˸e
¯Ä»Z¿Z
½Z»Z
»Ìv
¼ÅdË
-¾ÌeÂa
ÂeYaY
¹Â
½YËY
.
cZ]Zzf¿Y
¿¹Z
»ÉÁÌaÊ|ÀÆ
»½Y|¬fÀ
{d·Á
{]Ê
ZÁY
ÊfÌÀ»Y
©Y
^Å
½Z^·Z
Ã|¿Áa½Zf¯Za
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»±
Y
É|¼uY
¿{Y
Zf¿Y
ÉZÅ
dY
½ZËY³
ÊfÀ
Ã|¿Áa
¶»Z e
»¸n
]Z
{d·Á
¿ºÆ
Á
{ºÅ
»Ê
{|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
®Ë
]µ{ZÃZ´fY{Z
§{ÊÁ
ʨ»Âa
ʼZÅ
^Z
{ÁÓ
¿Ê¨n
,
¸Ê
»¶ÌZ¼YÉÆ
¯,ÉiÂ
»|¼v
Ê]¬ Ë
|̼u
¯,½ZËÂeZ
|Y
×Y
]½ZÌr»Y{Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¯ËÆ
¹ZÆ]Y
ÉZÅ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭم/
8
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮیﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮی
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿t¸Y|ÀfÌ
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
-
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
-
ﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﮐﺎﺭ
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺧﺪﻣﺖ-ﯾﮏ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽ-
ﺷﮑﻮﺭ
ﺍﮐﺒﺮﻧﮋﺍﺩﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﺵ-
ﺟﻤﺸﻴﺪ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻌﻠﯽ
ﺯﺍﻟﯽ-
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ-
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ
ﺗﺮﺍﺑﯽ
-
ﻻﻟﻪ
ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭی
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮﭘﻮﺭ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺭﺿﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﺯﻫﺮﻩ
ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮیﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺧﺒﺎﺯ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭیﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺮﻧﺪی
]Z
ÉZf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺳﻮم
/ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐ
|d·Y
Âm
{»Ìaﺻﻔﺤﻪﺻﻔﺤﻪ4444
{
|Ä¿Zzf·Y
§¥Â¸Ì
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ½Z{Ây88
»¹fv
dY
¿
º¿Zy
Ê^m
]ÉY
§Ä¼Z
:·ÂmMﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﯽ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﺎﺭیﺟﻼﻝ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﯽ
ﻋﻼﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩی
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
-
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﻴﺴﯽ
ﮐﻼﻧﺘﺮی
-
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮیﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¿¼Ê
|¿ÁM
4
5ZË
¿¨
ÌaÉY
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
Ìa
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
»ÄËZ
{½YY
{
Á
Äq
»Ê
¯Z¿.|ÀÀ
Äf¨³
ÊËZÅ
Y
ÄÀ˳
cYÁ
{ZY
¿Z
¯º
¸Ê
É{Z]M
Á
»½ZÌ]Yv
Ä^WZ
\¸¬e
{
cZ]Zzf¿Y
½Zf¿Z¤§Y
µZnÀm
]
[Zzf¿Y
ÉYÁ
½
Ê]Ó
½YËÁ
]ÉY
ÉY
Y{Z¼fY
{d·Á
»ÉÂÂ
Ze
{d·Á
É|¼uY
¿{Y
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
¸Ê
»ÊËYÌ
»¾v
Ê»ÔY
-
×Y|
¿ÉÌ
»Z|¼v
¾Ìu
{ɸÅ
-
¸Ê
^ºZ¬·YÂ]YÂbZ
Ê¿Z¼u
-
»É|Æ
½Á|˧©{Z
-|¿ÂÀu
Z|̼u
¯½ZËÂeZ
{Z¼|Ì
-ÊÀÌu
´É
»É{ÁÂ
©{Z
Z^Ë
¯¹Ô
-
^
Z
ÂËY{ÊËZm
«-É^À
Z|̼u
§LÔ³{ÓÂ
»|¼v»Ì
Ê«{Z
-
ÊÌvË
µM
©ZvY
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Y
Äf¨Å½Z»Âe
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
/¹ZÆq
8
ÂËÆ
/1388
/Äv¨100
Êf«Á½Z»Âe1000
Ä¿Z
ÉZÅ
{d·Á
]ÊËZ¼À³
»Ê
¯|ÀÀ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
»-h¸j
{
ÃZe
Y
dÌ «YÁ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
¾Ìu
ÊfËY|Å
-
¸Ê
ÉZ¿Y
»¾v
¿½Z¼Ë
-
»Z|¼v
¿ZÆm
»É|Æ
ʼZÅ
É°e
-
¿}Â
¨Ê Ì
É{ZÅ
»¬|Ê
-
»|¼v
»-ÊÅÔ
wÅZ
üu¾Ì»Y
\Ì°
-
c
×Y
½Z̨ÂË
ºZ¯|Ì
Ê»¯Y
-
{YÂm
¾ËM
»¾v»À
¯¾°ÅÂ
-
Z»Ô£
»^ÊuZ
»¬|¹
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
¿½Z
{
¯ÄÀÌ]Z
-
ÌW
|Ë|m
Á
Ä]Y
½YËY
Á
Z°Ë»M
-
Z¼Ì
{
»½Z
Y
{d·Á
¯Z
Ze
{d·Á
®Ë-d»|y
¿Ä»Z
ÄÌZua
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
ʬÀ̸:|Ì¿YÂy
-ʻZy
°
½Z¼Ìa{Y¿^¯Y
§-Á
|̼m
ÉZ¿Y
^ʸ Z
-Ê·Y
§{Z
»ÊÀ»Â
¸ZÌ
»-[Ânv
¾Ìv»Ô£
×Y¿¹ZÆ·Y
Ê]Ye
-
Ä·Ó
ÉZzf§Y
¶ÌZ¼Y
Ê»Y³
»¬|¹
-
»|¼v
¿ÂaÌ
»Z|¼v
ÊËZ
-
ÃÅ
½ZÌÆ·Y
»Ê^fn
ɯZ
-
»Z|¼v
Z^y
»|¼v
ÉY|¼f Ë
-
¸ZÌ
»¿|É
]Z
ÉZf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Y
Äf¨Å½Z»Âe
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
¹Â
µÁY/
ÂËÆ
/1388
/Äv¨100
ÊÅZ´¿½Z»Âe1000
]Ä
¿|ʳ
»Ê¨»Ì
Ê·Z
¿\
|d·Y
Âm
44Äv¨{»Ìa
{
|Ä¿Zzf·Y
§¥Â¸Ì
¨½Z{Ây88Äv
»¹fv
dY
¿
º¿Zy
Ê^m
]ÉY
§Ä¼Z
Äf¨Å:·ÂmM
[Ây
]Z
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
»h¸j
MOSALAS.IR
ʸ ÀÌu
µÔmÉZËÆ
ÊÌvË
Ã{Y
-
¸Ê
·|Ì
¸Ê
Ê¿Z¼u
-
Z
Ê¿Y{Ë
|¼v»Ì»Ô
Ê«{Z
×Y|Y
´É{ÓÁY
]¾¼Æ
¯ÁZ
-
¾Ìu
¸Ê¼Ì
Z|̼u
Ê«e
-
»ºË
]ÉÁÆ
ÊÌ
¯Éf¿Ô
-
¶ÌZ¼Y
¯ÉiÂ
^
Z
¸Ê¼Ì
¿¼¾Ì
©ZvY
d¨³ÉÌ´¿ZÆm
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¿¼Ê
|¿ÁM
4
5ZË
¿¨
ÌaÉY
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{¹Á
/
25
»{/1388{Y
/Äv¨100
½Z»Z½Z»Âe1000
Ã|¿ÁaÁ
ÉY
]ÉY
¼¸{°
ÉZ«M
¿¼Ã
ʸ17
-É{Z]M
¨54Äv
½Z»Z
¿¹Z
»d¨³Ê|ÀÆ
Á
³
]Z
¾ËYºË|ÌW
]Z
»ª§Â
^
Z
:É|¿ÂyM
¨Äv
ʻ38
»ºÌ¿Z
»fÀ
Ã|ÀËM
»|¼v
Äf¨Å:ʼZÅ
[Ây
]Z
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
»h¸j
{Â]MOSALAS.IR
Á
¿^{Â
¿{Â
]Ê
µZË
ÉZÅ
Ê¿Zf]Ze
Ê]½ÂË˸e
¯Ä»Z¿Z
½Z»Z
»Ìv
¼ÅdË
-¾ÌeÂa
ÂeYaY
¹Â
½YËY
.
cZ]Zzf¿Y
¿¹Z
»ÉÁÌaÊ|ÀÆ
»½Y|¬fÀ
{d·Á
{]Ê
ZÁY
ÊfÌÀ»Y
©Y
^Å
½Z^·Z
Ã|¿Áa½Zf¯Za
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»±
Y
É|¼uY
¿{Y
Zf¿Y
ÉZÅ
dY
½ZËY³
ÊfÀ
Ã|¿Áa
¶»Z e
»¸n
]Z
{d·Á
¿ºÆ
Á
{ºÅ
»Ê
{|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
®Ë
]µ{ZÃZ´fY{Z
§{ÊÁ
ʨ»Âa
ʼZÅ
^Z
{ÁÓ
¿Ê¨n
,
¸Ê
»¶ÌZ¼YÉÆ
¯,ÉiÂ
»|¼v
Ê]¬ Ë
|̼u
¯,½ZËÂeZ
|Y
×Y
]½ZÌr»Y{Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¯ËÆ
¹ZÆ]Y
ÉZÅ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭم/
8
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮیﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮی
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿t¸Y|ÀfÌ
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
-
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
-
ﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﮐﺎﺭ
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺧﺪﻣﺖ-ﯾﮏ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽ-
ﺷﮑﻮﺭ
ﺍﮐﺒﺮﻧﮋﺍﺩﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﺵ-
ﺟﻤﺸﻴﺪ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻌﻠﯽ
ﺯﺍﻟﯽ-
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ-
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ
ﺗﺮﺍﺑﯽ
-
ﻻﻟﻪ
ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭی
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮﭘﻮﺭ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺭﺿﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﺯﻫﺮﻩ
ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮیﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺧﺒﺎﺯ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭیﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺮﻧﺪی
]Z
ÉZf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺳﻮم
/ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐ
|d·Y
Âm
{»Ìaﺻﻔﺤﻪﺻﻔﺤﻪ4444
{
|Ä¿Zzf·Y
§¥Â¸Ì
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ½Z{Ây88
»¹fv
dY
¿
º¿Zy
Ê^m
]ÉY
§Ä¼Z
:·ÂmMﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﯽ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﺎﺭیﺟﻼﻝ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﯽ
ﻋﻼﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩی
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
-
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﻴﺴﯽ
ﮐﻼﻧﺘﺮی
-
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮیﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¿¼Ê
|¿ÁM
4
5ZË
¿¨
ÌaÉY
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
Ìa
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
§Ã|À^Ë
{|¿{Y
Ã|Á
ÉZÅ
ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{:|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽ،
ﻧﻴﺮﻩ
ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﻃﺎﻫﺮﺧﺎﻧﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺟﺎﺭﯾﺎﻧﯽﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ،
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ،
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻗﻮﺍﻣﯽ
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺷﺸﻢ/
22
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺭﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ
ﺁﺧﺮﯾﻦ
ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
¯Ä¿ZyZ
¾ËyMÊ]Ô¬¿Y
§º¸Ì
§{Â
¯ÓÂaZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»«Áfe
Ȧj
É|¼uY
¿{Y
¼¶
»Ê
¯ÉÆ»|À
ºÅ
ÌW
ÂƼm
dnu{Â
¹ÔÓY
:ʼÌÅY]Y
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭم/
8
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮیﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮی
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿t¸Y|ÀfÌ
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭم/
8
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮیﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮی
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿t¸Y|ÀfÌ
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
-
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
-
ﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﮐﺎﺭ
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺧﺪﻣﺖ-ﯾﮏ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﯽ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﯽ-
ﺷﮑﻮﺭ
ﺍﮐﺒﺮﻧﮋﺍﺩﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﺵ-
ﺟﻤﺸﻴﺪ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻌﻠﯽ
ﺯﺍﻟﯽ-
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ-
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ
ﺗﺮﺍﺑﯽ
-
ﻻﻟﻪ
ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭی
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮﭘﻮﺭ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺭﺿﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﺯﻫﺮﻩ
ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮیﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ
ﺷﺎﮐﺮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺧﺒﺎﺯ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭیﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺷﺮﯾﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺮﻧﺪی
]Z
ÉZf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺳﻮم
/ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ
ﻋﺎﻟﯽ
ﻧﺴﺐ
|d·Y
Âm
{»Ìaﺻﻔﺤﻪﺻﻔﺤﻪ4444
{
|Ä¿Zzf·Y
§¥Â¸Ì
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ½Z{Ây88
»¹fv
dY
¿
º¿Zy
Ê^m
]ÉY
§Ä¼Z
:·ÂmMﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﯽ
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﺎﺭیﺟﻼﻝ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮﻋﻠﯽ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﯽ
ﻋﻼﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩی
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ
ﮐﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
-
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﻴﺴﯽ
ﮐﻼﻧﺘﺮی
-
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮیﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﮐﻮﺛﺮی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮیd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
¿¼Ê
|¿ÁM
4
5ZË
¿¨
ÌaÉY
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
Ìa
]ÊÀÌ
]ÀÅZ
Y
ÉY
{Z¼fY
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
»-h¸j
§Ã|À^Ë
{|¿{Y
Ã|Á
ÉZÅ
ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺮ
ﮐﺮﺩ؟ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻫﺎی
ﮐﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎی
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﭼﺮﺍ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﯽ
ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{:|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﮐﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﯽ،
ﻧﻴﺮﻩ
ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﻃﺎﻫﺮﺧﺎﻧﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺟﺎﺭﯾﺎﻧﯽﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ،
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ،
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻗﻮﺍﻣﯽ
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
:Y
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻘﯽ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺍﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻏﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻧﺠﻒ
ﻟﮏ
ﺯﺍﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘﯽﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
،
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺷﺸﻢ/
22
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺭﺷﮑﺴﺘﮕﯽ
ﺁﺧﺮﯾﻦ
ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
¯Ä¿ZyZ
¾ËyMÊ]Ô¬¿Y
§º¸Ì
§{Â
¯ÓÂaZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»«Áfe
Ȧj
É|¼uY
¿{Y
¼¶
»Ê
¯ÉÆ»|À
ºÅ
ÌW
ÂƼm
dnu{Â
¹ÔÓY
:ʼÌÅY]Y
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
زﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍی
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺗﮑﺎﻧﯽ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﺑﺪﻧﯽﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﮐﻴﻤﻴﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ14
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺳﺮﯾﻊ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ
18
ﻭﺯﯾﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﻭی
ﻟﺒﻪ
ﺗﻴﻎ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂyﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻓﻀﺎﯾﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
-
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘﯽ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
-
ﺑﻴﮋﻥ
ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ
-
ﻣﺮﯾﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
ﻓﺮ
-
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﯽﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
-
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻧﻤﻴﻦd¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﻨﺠﻢ/
15
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
116
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ
ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﯽ
ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
|
µZ
»^ÃZ
ËZ«Á
´zZa
]|ÌZ
»\nfÀ
¿:ZÌ
]Ä
ÉZm
¦Ëve
®Ë
ZËÁ
]{Â
|a
Z
{½
]½Z³»ºËY
:½ZËn
{
¯ZÀ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
Ã|¿Z]MOSALAS.IRISSN:
]±
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﺳﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﻪ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﮐﻢ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩی
ﻭ
ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍی
ﺯﻥ
ﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻻﺑﯽ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍی
ﺭﺍی
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮی
ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪی
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
:|Ì¿YÂy
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
-
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ
ﻧﺼﻴﺮی
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺩﻫﻠﻮی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﯽ
-
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﮐﺎﺗﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ-
ﻋﺴﮕﺮی
ﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩی
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎ
ﮐﻼﻡ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽ
-
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾﯽﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﺩﺍﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﻗﻨﺒﺮی-
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﻋﻼء
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﯽ
-
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﯾﺤﻴﯽ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
]Z
Zf¨³
ÊËZÅ
:Yﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭم/
8
ﺷﻬﺮﯾﻮﺭ
/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭﻗﺘﯽ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻣﯽ
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
168
{
]]Y
®Ë
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
Y
Ì̤e
»Ê
{ºÅ
:ÊÀÌu
ZfyZ
¿º·ZZ
ÉY
¿¼Ê
{|Å
:Ê·Ôm
»¸n
]Ä
Ê]Ó
ÉZÅ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
2008-5281
MOSALAS.IRISSN:
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﯽ
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
-
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭی
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻧﺮﯾﻤﺎﻥ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮیﻣﻬﺪی
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮی
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
-
ﻧﻮﺫﺭ
ﺷﻔﻴﻌﯽ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﺩی
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﯽ
-
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﻼﺯﻫﯽ-
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ
ﺷﮑﻴﺐ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
-
ﻋﺰﺕ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﺳﻴﺪﮐﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
-
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺁﺭﯾﻦ
ﻣﻨﺶﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﮐﻮﻫﮑﻦ
-
ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﯽ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
d¨³
ÊËZųÁ
]:Z
t¸Y
¿t¸Y|ÀfÌ
¿|ÀfÌ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
j¯Y
½YËÁ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
da
Ã{a
[Zzf¿Y
YÁ
{
d¨³
Á
³
]Z
¸Ê
»ÉÆ
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﺭﺍﺑﻄ ﻪ ﺍﯾﺮﺍ ﻥﻭ ﻭ ﺁ ﻣﺮﯾﮑ ﺎ
ﻭ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺍﺳ ﻼﻣﯽ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﺷﮑﺴﺘ ﮕﯽ ﺁ ﺧﺮ ﯾﻦ ﻣﻴﺮ ﺍﺙ
ﮔ ﺰﺍﺭﺷﯽ
ﻭﺭﺷﮑﺴﺘ ﮕﯽ ﺁ ﺧﺮ ﯾﻦ ﻣﻴﺮ ﺍﺙ ﺷﻬﻴ ﺪ ﺻﺎﺩ ﻕ ﺍﺳ ﻼﻣﯽ
ﮔ ﺰﺍﺭﺷﯽ ﺍﺯ
:YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
]]YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻭﯾﮋﻩﻧﺎﻣﻪ
8ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
+48
ZÅÊ]Ô¬¿Y
|¿|¿Z» ZÆÀe
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ISSN: 2008-5281
] Ö À¼Æ
|ÀÅ YÂy
Ê» ZÅ
Ö Ì¸´¿ Y
]
]::Z
Z ] ÊËZųÁ
Ê ËZųÁd¨³
d¨³
MOSALAS.IR
:
]
MOSALA S.IR
»|À¯ Ê»¶ ¼ { YÉ¿ |¼ uY ¶ j
¿{ Ì´] Ã|Ë{ Z
Y ½YËY
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻣﯽ
ﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﺩ؟
ﺍﺳﻼ
ﮐﺮ
ﻫﺎی
ﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﻮﺭﻤﺮﺎﻫﺎی
ﯾﯽ
ﺸﻮﺭ
ﺳﻔ
ﺳﻴﻨ
ﺳﻴﻨ
ﮐﺸﻪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴ ﻧﺎ
ﻣﻴ
ﻧﺪ
ﺍﻥ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪﮐ
ﺭﺩ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮ
ی
ﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﻫﺎﻮﺭﺩ
ﺧﻮ
ﺮﻭﻍ
ﻭﻍ
ﺯی
ﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻪ
ﮔﺸﺖ
ﻮﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﺧﻪ
ﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺍﻓﺮﻪ ﺑﺑ
ﻖﺩﺍﭼﺍﻓﺮﺑﺎ
ﺍﻣ
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍی
ﻤﺎﺩ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾﻖ
ﭘﻴ
ﻋﻤﺎﺑﺮ
ﻮﯾﺑ
ﯽﺑﺮ
ﮐﻪ
ﻧﯽ
ﮐﻪﻌﻋﻧﺎ
ﺍﯾﯽ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞﺗﺮﺯﻻﺍﯾﻧ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،ﻪ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،ﻧﺎﻪﻮ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﻭﺯﺭ
ﺩﮐﺘﺭ
ﺳﻧﺎ
ﻭﺯﻻﺎﻧ
ﺳﮔﮔﻮﻤﻤ
{¯Ê¿Zz¼ ʸ , ¥Z^Ì·Z« «Z] |¼v» f
{¯½Z¬Å{ ¾Ìu ,ʸÌZ¼Y ¾v» f
»Ê¼Ë¯ É|Æ» , Z¼ »Ê^m |Ìn
ÖÌW Z Á É{°Å{ ʸ ,ÊËÔ ¾Ìu
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
Ã{a da
{YÁa ÊZ¼¸bË
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
|¿ YÂ e Ê Z°Ë
¼¿ »M É Yy
´Á Âa
¿{ Ì´] Ã |Ë{Z
Y ½Y ËY
]|¿Â »ZÌ] Y Z» Õ Y|° ¿Z
´|¿ YÂ e{Ì
{ʼ¿Z°] ÃË|Ë
»MZ¿Y
É ½YYËY
y
|ÀÅ YÂy
|¿Â
Ê ZÅ
¿´¸»»ZÌ]ÖYÌ
Z» ÕY Ö
Y|°
]À¼Æ ¿]Z
½ZËY´·ÂY ËY
»µ|f
|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
{
:Ê» ¾Ìu
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻫﻢ 19 /ﻣﻬﺮ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺯﯾﺒﺎ ﮐﻼﻡ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﯽ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ
:ʫe Z|̼u
»ºÌfÌ¿ ª§Y» {Y¿É|¼uY Z] ZÅÁ { Z
½{Y{ ÉY m ÉYÃZq ½ZËY´·ÂY
]|ÀfY|¿ {Y¿É|¼uY Ä
¯| ] Á{ ʸ¯Âe Á ÀÅZ] ¶j» Ê¿Z
{ |¿ÂÊ» dÌuÔ
½ZËY´·ÂY ¹YÁ|Ì»Y
]|¿Á] ¥Z^Ì·Z« ¶j» É{§ d¼ Ä
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺖ
ﺍﺳﻪﯽ
ﺮﺿﺎﺭ ﺳﻠﻭﻫﻤﻴﻤ
ﯽ،
ﺟﺎﯾﻪﺿﺮ
ﻋﻠﻴ
ﻫﺎ ﺑ
ﺼﻴﺮی،ﻭ
ﻧﺸﮕﺎﺮﻭﻩ ﺯ
ﺍﷲ ﻧﯽﻓﻴ
ﺮﯾﻤ
ﻌﻄﻴﻠﯽ ﺩﺍ
ﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﺗ ﺳ ﻌﮐ
ﻭ
ﻭ
،
:¹Ô¯ Z^Ë ©{Z
|Ê» Z¼ d]¿ {Á ZË Ë{ !Ê«e ÉZ«M
ﻋ ﺒ ﺪ ﻟﺍ ﻮ ﻫﺎﺏﻓﺮ ﺍﺗ، ،
ﯽ،
ÉY]É{ZËÉZÅÌq
{Y{{ÁkÁ½{Âycu
:ÊZ§ ¾Ë|·Y µÔm
cY]Zz» ¶¯ Ë|» Z] ³ Á d¨³
{««Y´f»|y» d·Á
¯{¹¹
¯{{
¯{
»¯ ¹Z
¹Z
¹
¹Z»Y
Z» [Zf¯ {YÁ ¾» Y
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭی ﺳﻬﺎﻡ ﺷﺮﮐﺖ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
]:YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
ﻮﺭ ﺭﺷﻴﺪی
ﺷﻴﺪی
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺪ ﺧ ﺧﻮ
ﻃﻼﯾﯽ،ﺍﺣ ﻤ
ﻀﯽ ﻃﻼﯾ ﯽ
ﺮﺗﻀ ﯽ
ﻣ ﻣﺮﺗ
ﺯﺵ|:
ﺭﺯﺵ
ÂyﻭﺭﻣﯽÌ¿Y
ﺩﺭﻭ
»Êﺭ
ﺍﺳﻼ
ﯽﺩ
ﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳ
¼ÃZﺩ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥﺼﺎ
ﻫﺎیﺍﻗﺘﺳ
ﺖﺑﺎﻫﺎی
ﺭﻩ
ﺳﺎﯾﻄﺩﺭﻪ
ﺮﻩ
¾ËYﺰﺑ
ﭼﻬ
ﭼﻴﺭﺍ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
{
ﻧﺪﻩ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﭘﻫﻤﺮﻭﻪ
ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﯽ
ﻧﯽ
ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﯽ
ﻴﻘﯽ
ﻧﺪﻩﻩ
ﺷﻤﺴﻰ
ﺴﻰﻡ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭی
ﺩﺭی
ﻧﺪ
ﺯﯾﺒﺎﮐﻼ
ﺮﻭﺯﺎﻼ
ﻭﺯﺤ
ﻗﺎﺎﮐ
ﺳﺒﻮﻓﻤ
ﺯﯾﺒﻓﺮ
ﺪﺗﺷ
ی
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻓ
ﻭﻭﺩﺩی
ﻣﺤﻤ
ﺴﻦ
ﻔﺮ
ﺍﷲ
ﻕ
ﺴﺍﻭﻭﻦ
ﺟﻌﻔﺮ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﻕ
ﺟﻌﺩ
ﻒ
ﯽ،
ﻟﻄﻒ
ﮕﯽ،
ﺻﺎﺩ
ﺻﺎ
ﻞﺣﺣﺩﺍ
ﻌﯽ،
ﯽ
ﺍﺗﯽ،
ﻋﻴﻞ
ﻴﮕ
ﻋﻴﺑﻴﻟﻄ
ﻃﺒﺎ،
ﻣﻌ
ﺒﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﺴﺠﺪﺟﺎﻣ
ﺪ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﺑ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻓﺮ
ﺠﺪﺟﺎ
ﻮﻫﺎﺏﻃ
ﯽ
ﻤﯽﻤ
ﻫﺎﺷﺤﻤ
ﺷ
ﺿﺎﻣ
ﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎﺍﻟ
ﺴ
ﻋﺒﺪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺪﺭﻣﻫﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻤﺪ
ﺪ
ﻣﺤﻣﺤﻤ
ﻣﺤﺍﺣﻤ
ﻃﺒﺒﻴﺒﻴﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻃﺏ
ﺖ
ﺰی
ﻏﺮ
ﺍﺳ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻪ
ﭘﺎﯾﻴ
ﺍﻥ ﻭﻫﻤ
ﻣﺎ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮ ﺮﺭ
ﺿ
ﮔﺮ
ﺑﻄﻄﺑﻪﻪ
ﺷﺎ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺑ
ﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍﻭ
ﺗﻤﺎﺭ ﺍ
ﯽ
ﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺩﮔﮔﯽ
ﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻮﺵ
ﺩﺭﺭﺍﻧﺑﺰﺍﺰﺩ
ﻏﺮﺮﺑﺍ
ﻤﺪﻏﺧﺩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﺤﻴﻠﻨﻧﺪﻩ
ﯽ
ﻤﺎ
ﺮﻭ
ﺳﻴ
ﺗ ﭘﻌﻄ
ﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺖ
ﺍﺯﺍﻗﻌﻴ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯﻭ
ﺩﺭﻙﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ؛
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ؛
ISSN: 20 08-5281
:
|ÌÀ¯ [Y
[ Yy
yY
Y
ÀÅÀÅ d
´:ÂÁd·Áa
{·Á
»{½ZÌ
{½ZÌ» Õ
Õ Z¼fY
¼{Z
Ö]fY
YÂ
{ÖYÂË
{Ë
]
ﻮﻥ ﺗ ﺤﺗﺤﻮﻻﻮﻻ ﺕ
ﺮﺍﻣﺮﺍﻣﻮ ﻥ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﮔ ﻮ ﻴ ﭘﻴ
ﺭﻫﺒ ﺮ
ﯽ
ﻤﺪ ﺗﺗﻘﻘﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﺤ
{ :|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
MOSALAS.IR
Y e¹Â¸» ½ZËY´·ÂY
|ÀfÅ ½Z^¸sÔY
§ÉÁÌa É Ä] Y
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍیﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﺮﯾﺎﻝ »ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ«
ﺍﻣﻴﺮﻃﺎﺍﻥﻫﺮﺧ ﻧﺎ ﯽ
ﯽﺍﺧﻮ
ﻤﯽ
ﻤﯽ،
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﺮﻩ
ﻫﺎﺷﻧﻴ
ﺳﻠﻴ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،
ﯽ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﻌ
ﻮﻣﺮﺙ
ﺭﻓﻴ
ﯽﺮﺿﺎ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﻠﻴ
ﻋﻠ
ﮐﻴ
ﮐﻴ
ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎﺣﯽﻤﻴﺪ ﺣﺴﻴﻨ ﯽ
ﺟﺎﺭﯾ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ،
ﻦﻣ ﻬﺪی
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴ
ﻋﺘﻤ ﺎﺩ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺍﻋﺘﻤ
ﺭﺍﻱﻧﺪ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺭ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺷﺸ ﻢ 22 /ﺷﻬ ﺮ ﯾﻮﺭ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤ ﻪ 1000 /
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
:|Ì¿Y Ây
Ây
»Ê
»Ê
¼¼ÃZÃZ
¾ËY¾ËY
{ {
ﻤﯽﺘﯽﻨﯽﯽ::
ﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩ
ﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩ
ﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥZﻮ
ﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﻟﺪﯾﻨﺎﻧﻠ]ﻧﻠZﻮ
ﻘﻴﻤ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘ
ÊËZųÁ
ﻣﻘﻴ]ﺎ
ﺮﺍﺧ
ﺳﻼﻣ
ﺪﯾ
ﺮﺍﺧ
ÊËZÅÂ
ﺧﺴﺮﻟ
ﻦ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻤﺪ
ﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺴﻏﺍ
ﻻﺳﻼﻡﻗﻣ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﺴﻴﻏ
ﻦﺧﻗ
ﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻴﺣﻣﺤ
ﻟﺤﺴﻴ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺍﯾﯽ،ﻡ
ﻏﺎﻡ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﯽ،ﻡﻣ
ﻤﺪ
ﻡ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼ ﺍ
ﻻﺳﻼ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻟﺤ
ﺍﯾ
ﻣﺤ
ﺪﺍﺮﺯ
ﺿﺯ
ﻟﮏﺪﺍ
ﺮﻫﻨﮕﯽ،
ﻤﻴﺪ
ﮕﯽ،
ﻟﮏ
ﻋﺒ،
ﻋﺒﺍ
ﺣﺠﺖ³Á
d¨³
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﻣﯽ
ﯽ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﻫﻨﺣ
ﺍﮐﺮ،ﺭ
d¨³ﻓﻓﺮﻮ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙ
ﻦ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺳﻴﺪﺴﻴ
ﻤﺪﺣ
ﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﻠ
ﻣﺤ
ﻋﺘﻤ ﺎﺩ
ﺭﺍﻱﺍﻋﺘﻤ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍ
ﺭﺳﻲ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺑ ﺮﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﻥ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﻔﺘﻢ29ﺷ ﻬﺮ ﯾ ﻮﺭ 116 /138 8ﺻﻔﺤ ﻪ 1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎ
/
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﻱ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎ ﻝ /
ﻫﻔﺘ ﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒ ﺮ ،
{   Ƽ: Ê
m ¼ÌÅY]Y
ÌWº
¹ ÅÔÓY
É dnu
» Æ
ﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮﺩﮐﺘﺮﺗﻮﮐ ﻠﻲ
ﮔﻔﺖﺑﺎ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺑ ﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﺩﺭﮔﻮ
Ã{a
YÁa
Ã{ada
YÁa
da
{ÊZ¼¸bË
{ÊZ¼¸bË
M OSALA S.IR
ISSN: 2008
-5281
Ó
{]« Á aZ¯»fe {à Z
§Â§º ¸Ì
¾É Y
à |¿Á
Ë yM
a
¯Ê ]Ô¬ ¿YÄ¿Z y Z
|¿{Y{ÉZÅ
§Ã|À^Ë
Ã|Á
::Z]Z] ÊËZųÁ
ÊËZųÁ
d¨³
d¨³
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺗﻮﮐﺗﻮﮐﻠﻲﻠﻲ
ﺩﮐﺘﺮﺎﺩﮐﺘﺮ
ﮔﻔﺖﺑﺎ ﻭﮔﻮ ﺑ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﺩﺭﮔﻮ
]:YÊ ËZÅZ f¨³Z
]f¨³Z
{|¿{Y
ÉZÅ
Ã|Ã|Á
§À^Ë
ﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﻨﺪﻩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨ
ﯽﮐﺮ ﺁﯾﺩ؟
ﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﺳﻔ ﺮ
ﻤﻴﺪ
ﺳﻴﻨ ﻤ ﺎﯾ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﻪﻪ
ﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﻣﻴﺎﻧ
ﺍﻥﻧﺎ
ﺕ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭ
ﻌﯽ،
ﻣﺪﯾﺮ
ﺛﺒﺎ
ﺸﺖ ﺧ
ﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻪ
ﻮﻥ
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ
ﻭﻍ
ﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻪ
ﺷﺎﻓ
ﭼﻪ ﺑﺑ
ﺮﮔﺍﻣﺮ
ﺍﻓ
ﺍیﻪﺍﺍﮔﺮ
ﻤﺎﺩﺩ
ﻴﻦ
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﭘﻴ
ﺍیﺑﺮ
ﺸﻢ
ﻋﻤﺎﮐ ﺑ
ﯽ
ﯽﺑﺮ
ﻧﯽ
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﺑﺮﻧﺎ
ﺍﯾﯽ
ﻻﻋ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،ﻪﻮﻧﺯﺍﯾﭼ
ﻭﺯﺭﻪﺮﺭ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،
ﻭﺯ
ﺳ
ﮐﺘﺎﻧ
ﮔﻤﻧﺎ
ﮔﻤ
ﺩ
]:Y ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
ISSN: 2008-5281
{ :|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
: Y ÊËZÅZf¨³
]ÊËZÅZf¨³Z]Z
ISSN: 2008-5281
{|Á¨] ½Z¼¸Ì§|¿Y
{{YY
{Y
Ì¿YÂyﺵ¿:|Ì
ÂyﺯY
ﻣﯽﺭﻭﺭ
ﺩﺭ
ﯽﺩﯽ
ﺮﯾﮑﺎ
»Ê
ﯽ
ﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣ
ﺍﺳﻼ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳ
¼ÃZﺩ
¼ÃZ
ﺁﻣ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎ
ﺘﺼﺎ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥﻭ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥﻭﺁ
ﻫﺎی
ﻫﺎی
ﺭﻩ
ی
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﺍﻗ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻫﺎﺑﺎ
ﺳﺎﯾﺖ
ﺑﻄﻪ
ﻬﺮﻩ
¾ËYﺍﺰﺰﺩ ﺭ
ﭼﻴﺭ
¾ËYﺭ
ﭼ
ﭼﻴ
ﻮﺭ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻧﺪﻩ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺣﻀ
{
ﻫﻤﻪ
{ﺮﻭ
ﭘ
ﺷﻴﺪﻴﺪیی]:Z
ÊËZųÁ
ÊËZųÁ
ﺍﺣﻤﻤﺪﺪﺧ ﺧﻮﺭﻮﺭﺷ
ﻼﯾﯽ،ﺍﺣ
ﻃﻼﯾ ،
ﯽ
d¨³ﻃ
ﺮﺗﻀﯽ
ﻣﻣﺮﺗ ﻀﯽ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺭﻙﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩی ،ﺩﮐﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽ ﻣﻠﮑﻮﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﯾﻤﺎﻧﯽ ﺧﻮﺷﺨﻮ ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺷﺎﻟﻮﯾﯽ،ﺩﮐﺘﺮﺣﺴﻦﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﯽ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎﺷﺎﯾﺎﻥﻣﻬﺮ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺳﺎﯾﺖﻫﺎیﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎی ﺳﻴﺎﺳﯽ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ
ﻋﺘﻤ ﺎﺩ
ﺭﺍﻱﺍﻋﺘﻤ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺭ ﻭﻧﺪ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲﺳﺎ ﻝﺍﻭ ﻝ /
ﺍﻥ /
ﻱﺗ
ﺍﯾﺮ ،
ﺧﺒﺧﻮﺮﺍﻩ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﻢ
ﺼﺎﺩﺩ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎ
ﺖ
ﺖ
ﺍﻗﺘﺩ
ﻤﺎﻣﻴ
ﻤﺎﻣﻴﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﺮﻪﺮ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﺑ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨ
ﻤﻬﻮﺭﺑ
ﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﺁﻥ
ﺩﺭﺮ ﺗﺗ
ﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺍﯾﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭﺮ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺟﺪ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺟ
ﻧﺪ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﻭﺳﺎیﻧﺮ
ﻟﮕﺮ ﻭ
ﻟﮕﺮﮕ
ﺩﺷ
ﯽ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺎﻮﻮﻧﯽ
ﺍﺻﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﺮ
ﺍﺻﺭ
ﺟﻬ
ﻬﻢﺩﺍ ﮔ
ﺳﻬﻢﺍ
ﭼﺮ
ﭼﺮ
ﺳﺭﮐﻮ
ﺻﻔ ﺤ ﻪ 1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻢ 29ﺷﻬ ﺮ ﯾﻮﺭ 116 /138 8
ﻱ ﺗ ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎ ﻝ ﺍﻭ /ﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻔﺘ /
ﻫﻔﺘ ﻪﻧﺎﻣ ﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ،
ﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩﻩ
ﻤﯽﻮ
ﺘﯽ
ﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﻨﯽ
ﯽ
ﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎ
ﻟﺪﯾﻨﺎﻧﻠ
ﺍﺧﻴﻤ
ﻣﺘ
ﺪﯾﻴ
ﺳﻼﺮﻣ
ﻣﻘ
ﻗﺮ ﻟﻘ
ﺧﺴﻣﺍﻏ
ﻦ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻤﺪﻡ
ﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝﺧ
ﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻻﺳﻼ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼ
ﺣﺴﻴ
ﻦ
ﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ،
ﻡ،
ﻣﻴﻣﺤ
ﺴﻴ
ﻏﺎﺣ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺍﯾﯽ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﻤﺪ
ﯽ،
ﻻﺳﻼﻡ
ﺍﯾﺿﻟﺤﺮﻣﺍ
ﻣﺤ
ﺣﺠﺖﺪﺍﺪﺍﺯ
ﮕﯽ،
ﻤﻴﺪ
ﻟﮏ،
ﻨﮕﯽ،ﺒ
ﻋﺒﺍ
ﻤﻴﺪ
ﻧﺠﻒﻋ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﯽ
ﺮﻫﻫﻨ
ﺣ
ﻮﺭ،ﺣ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﭙﻮﻓﻓﺮ ،ﺭ
ﻦ
ﺴﻴﻦ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳ
ﺣﺴﻴ
ﺳﻴﺪ
ﯽﺣ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻋﻠ
ﺍﺧﻮﺮ ﺍﻥﻃﺎ ﻫﺮﺧ ﻧﺎ ﯽ
ﯽﺍﻣﻴ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽ،
ﺮﻩ
ﻤﯽ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻧﻴ
ﺳﻠﻴ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ،
ﯽ
ﺙﻌ
ﺮﺿﺎ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌ
ﻮﻣﺮﺭﻓﻴ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻋﻠﻋﻠﻴﯽ
ﮐﻴ
،ﻣﻬﺪی ﺟﺎﺭﯾﺎﻧﯽ
]:YY Ê ËZ ÅZ f¨³Z
½YËÁj¯Y
½YËÁ
Ì¿YÂyﻣﯽﯽ|:
ﺍﺳﻼﻣÌ¿Y
ﺍﻥ
ﺍﺳﻼ
ﻫﺎیﺍﯾﺮÂ
yﺍﻩ
ﺧﻮ
ﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
Êﺩ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﻢ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
Ê
ﮐﺸﻮﺭ
ﻮﺭ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎ
ﺸﻪﺩﻪﺼﺎ
ﺍﻗﺘ
»ﺑﻴﻨ
ﺑﻴﻨ
¼ÃZﺮﮐﺗ
¼ÃZﮐﺎﺑﮐﺎ»
ﻫﺎی
ﻮﺭ
ﺁﻥ
ﺩﺭ
ﻫﺎی
ﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
ﻤﻬ
ﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥﺮ
ﺯی
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﻟﮕﺮﺍﯾﺎﻥﺮ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺪ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺟ
ﻌﻮﯾﻖﺟ
ﻧﺪ
ی
ﻖ
ﮕﺮﻭ
ﮕﺮ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎﺑﺎﻧ
ﻮﯾ
ﻭﺳﺎ
ﺩﺷ
¾ËY
ﻧﯽ
ﯽ
ﺗﻌﻮ
ﻬﺎ ﻮ
ﺍﺻ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﮔﺮﺗ
ﺍﺻﻧﺎﺭ
¾ﻬ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞﺟﺟ
{ﺩ
ﺳﻬﻢﺍ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺳﻬﻢﺩ
ﭼﺮ
ﮐﻮ ﺍ
ﭼﺮ
ﮐﻮ
{ËYﺭﺭ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ،ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ ﻣﻮﻣﻨﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﻮﺵ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﻧﺴﻞﮐﺸﯽ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﯾﻤﻦ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭی ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﭼﺮﺍ »ﭼﺎی ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺗﻘﻮﺍﯾﯽ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪ
ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺣﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﯾﺸﻪ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ
ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯی ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﻣﺸﺎﯾﯽ
ﻃﺒﻴﺒﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﻴﺎﻥ
ﻃﺒﻴ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻴﻤﯽ
ﻤﺪ
ﺳﻠﻤﺪ
ﺏ
ﺰی
ﻏﺮ
ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻣﺤ
ﭘﺎﯾﻴﻭ
ﺿﺮﺭﻣﺤﻭ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﺟﺎﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺎ
ﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺮﺭ
ﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ
ﺑﻪﺿ
ی
ﺑﻄﻪ
ﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔ
ﻫﺎ
ﺮﯾﺎﺭ
ی،
ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻭﺯ
ﺮﻩ
ﻫﺎ
ﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻬﻩﺮﻭﺭ ﺍ
ﮔﯽ
ﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺼﻴﺮ
ﯽ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺷﻬﺗ
ﻓﻴ
ﺸﮕﺎﺗ
ﻨﻌﻠﯽﭼ
ﺮﯾﻤﯽ
ﺑﺰﺩﮔ
ﺵ
ﺑﺰﺩ
ﺍﷲﺍﻧ
ﺩﺭﺍﻧ
ﺩﺭﺩﺮﺍﻮ
ﻏﺮ
ﺪﺧﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﯽﻏ
ﯽ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻤﺎ
ﻤﺪﮐ
ﻧﺪﻩ
ﻤﺎ
ﻠﯽ
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﻌ
ﺳ
ﻋﻠ
ﺳﻴﻨ
ﺳﻴﻨ
ﻣﺤ
ﻌﻄﻴ
ﺗﭘ ﺮﻭ
ﺮﻭﺯﻧﺪﯽ
ﻧﺪﻩﻩ
ﻰﻡ
ﺭی
ی
ﺯﯾﺒﺎﮐﻼ
ﺩﺭﻼ
ﻗﺎﺩﻴﻘﺎﻧ
ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘ
ﺷﻤﺴ
ﺳﺒﺤ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯ
ﺪﻮﻓﻗﺎﺒﺎﮐﺤ
ﺳﺒ
ﻤﺪ
ﺯﯾ
ﺩﻕﻓﻤﺗ
ﺴﻦﺮ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩی
ﻦ
ی
ﻕ
ﻣﺤ
ﻣﺤ
ﺟﻌﻔ
ﺣﺴﻔ
ﻭﺩ
ﻄﻒﺩ
ﻟﻄﻒ
ﻭﻭ
ﺻﺎ
ﺟﻌ
ﺣ
ﺻﺎ
ﺩﺍﻭ
ﺍﺗﯽ،،
ﺑﻴﮕﯽ،
ﯽ،
ﺮﺍﺗﻟ ﺩﺍ،
ﺑﻴﮕ
ﻃﺒﺎ،
ﻞ
ﻌﯽ
ﯽ،
ﺒﺎ
ﻴﻞ
ﻋﻴﺮ
ﯽ
ﻤﺪﻓﻌﻃ
ﯽ
ﺴﺠﺪﺟﺎﻣ
ﻤﺎﻋ
ﺠﺪﺟﺎﻣ
ﻤﺎ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻤ
ﺏ
ﻣﺤ
ﺍﺳﺤ
ﻫﺎﺷ
ﺿﺎﺍﺳ
ﻮﻫﺎﻣ
ﻫﺎ
ﻤﺪﺭﻮﺭﺿﺎ
ﺴ
ﺪﺍ ﻟ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻟﻣ
ﺒﺪ
ﻤﺪﻣ
ﻋﺒ
ﻤﺪﺪ
ﺍﺣﻋﻤﺤ
ﻣﺤﻣ
ﺍﺣ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
{ÁMZÅ°¨ÀÁ:Ê°¼¿Ã
{Ã
ZË ©Y§ Z] Ä¿Z» º£
{§ÉYmZ» Y Z
»® §¾Ì·Z
ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﯾﺰ ﻣﺸﮑﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ
:
]
ISSN: 20 08
-5281
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯﻭﺍﺯﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ؛ﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ؛ﺩﺭ
M OSALA S.IR
[ ¯|ÌÀ
[Yy
Yy Y ÀÅ
{ÀÅÁd·Á
: Âa
»½ZÌ
»½ZÌ
¼´Õ{Z
Õ{Z¼fY
]fÖ
]YÖ
{YÂË
{YÂË
{Ì´] Ã|Ë{Z¿Y
: ½YËY
M OSALA S.IR
ISSN: 20 08
-5281
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﻧﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎی 8ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺿﺎﯾﯽ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻏﺮﺑﺰﺩﮔﯽ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﯽﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﺭﻫﻤﻪﺍﺳﺖ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﺩﺭﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥﭘﺎﯾﻴﺰی
{Ì´] Ã|Ë{Z¿ Y ½YËY
]]|¿Â»ZÌ]YZ»ÕY|°¿Z
Z]::Ê
ÊËZųÁ
ËZÅ ³Ádd¨³¨³
ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥﺮﺧ ﺎﻧﯽ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﺍﻣﻴ ﺮﻃﺎﻫ
ﺮﻩﻤﯽ
ﻤﯽ،
ﻫﺎﺷ
ﯽﻧﻴ
ﺳﻠﻴ ،
ﺙﻌ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻌﻠﻢ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ
ﻮﻣﺮﺭﻓﻴ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﯽ
ﮐﻴ ﻣ
ﻋﻠ
ﺟﺎﺭﯾ ﻧﺎ ﯽ
،ﻣ ﻬﺪی
ﺗﻮﮐ ﻠﻲ
ﮔﻮﺩﮐﺘﺮﺩﮐﺘﺮﺗﻮﮐ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭ ﺑ ﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻮﺑﺎ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﮐﺮ ﺩ؟
ﺁﯾﻨﺪﻩ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﯾﯽ
ﯽ
ﻤﺎﯾ
ﻤﻴﺪﺮ
ﻴﻨﻔ ﺮ
ﺳﻴﺪﺳﺎﻧﺣﻪﻪﺳﺳﻔ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻥﻧﺎ
ﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﻣﻴ
ﻧﺪ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭ
ﻮﺭﺩ
ﺛﺒﺎ ﺕ
ﮔﺸﺖ
ﺧ
ﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﯽ،
ﻮﻥ
ﺮﻭﻍ
ﻭﻍ
ﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻮﻥ
ﭼﻪ
ﺍیﺑﺮ ﺑ
ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻣ
ﻦ
ﺍﻣ
ﺸﻢ
ﺍی
ﯽﻪﺑﺮﺍﺍﻓﺮﺮﺑ
ﭘﻴ
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﺩ
ﻧﯽ
ﭘﻴﺩ
ﭼﻤﺎﮐﺑﺮ
ﻤﺎ
ﺍﯾﯽﻪﻧﺯ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،ﻧﺎ
ﯽ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،ﺮﻋﻋ
ﻻﻧﺎ
ﺩﮐﺘﻻﺎﻧ
ﻭﺯﺭﻮﺍﯾﻮﻤ
ﺳﺳﮔ
»É Æ
¸Æ Ê
Ê
» ¸ Z]Z] ³ ³ Á d¨³
d ¨³ {{ Y
[Y ÁÁ
Z Zzf¿Y
z
f ¿ÃY {a
{ da
d
a
a
ﺗﺤﻮﻻ ﺕ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
ﻥ ﺗ ﺤﻮﻻ
ﺍﻣﻮﻮﻥ
ﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﻴﺮﺍﻣ
ﺑﻄ ﭘﻪ ﭘﻴ ﺮ ﺍ
ﺖ ﻭﮔﺭﮔ ﺍﻮﻮ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻴﻞﻞﻭ ﮔ ﻔ
ﺤﻠ ﻴ
ﺗﺗﺤﻠ
{  Ƽm
:
ʼÌÅ
ÌW¹Y]Y
ÔÓY
º ÅÉ d
Æ
»nu
ﺗﻮﻣﺎ ﻥ
ﻮﺭ 116 /138ﺻﻔﺤﻪ 1000 /
ﭘﻨﺠ ﻢ 15/ﺷﻬ ﺮﯾ 8
ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺳﺎ ﻝﺍﻭ /ﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
/
ﻱﺗ
]، {Â
ZËÁﻪﺧﺒ ﺮ
ﻫﻔﺘ ﻪﻧﺎﻣ
®Ë
ﺗﻮﻣﺎ ﻥ
116 /138 8ﺻﻔﺤ ﻪ 1000 /
ﺷﺸ ﻢ 22 /ﺷﻬﺮ ﯾ ﻮﺭ
ﺳﺎ¯Àﻝ| ﺍﻭ /ﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ
¶ /Ê
ﻱﺗ
ﺧﺒ{ﺮ ،
»¶ jﻫﻔﺘ ﻪﻧﺎﻣ
¼ »
¿ |¼uYﻪYÉ
{ ¯ZÀ
]ºËY
½: ZËn
½{ Z
»½ Z³
|a
¯Ê ]Ô¬ ¿YÄ ¿Z yZ
ﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺖ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﺯﻭﺍﺯﺍﻗﻌﻴ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ؛
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ؛
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
]]|ÀÅYÂyÊ»ZÅÖ̸´¿Y:ÖÀ¼Æ
ﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩ
ﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩ
ﻤﯽﻮ
ﺘﯽ
ﺮﻭﯾﺎﻥ
ﻨﯽ
ﯽ
ﻟﺪﯾﻨﺎﻧﻠ
ﻘﻴﻤ
ﺳﻼﻣﺘ
ﺍﺧ
ﻣﻘﻴ
ﺳﻼﻣ
ﺪﯾ
ﺴﺮﻟ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦﻡ
ﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﻗﺮ
ﻦﻡ
ﺮﺗﺎﺝ
ﺧﺴﺍﻏ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼ ﻣ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼ
ﻦ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺣﺴﻴ
ﻤﺪ
ﺧ
ﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﺴﻴ
ﻡ،ﻡﻣﻴ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻏﺎﻡ،
ﻣﺤﻣ
ﻤﺪﻡ
ﺍﻻﺳﻼ
ﻟﺤ
ﻻﺳﻼ
ﺮﻏﺎ
ﺍﯾﯽ،
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﯽ،
ﻣﺤ
ﺿﺮ
ﮏﺪﺍ
ﺿ
ﻋﺒ
ﺍﯾﺒ
ﮏ
ﻤﻴﺪﻋﻟﺯ ﺍ
ﮕﯽ،،
ﯽ
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﻫﻨﮕﯽ،ﻟ
ﺍﮐﺮﻣﻣ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺍﮐﺮ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎﻫﻨﺣ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦﺭ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ،
ﻦ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﻓﺮﻮ،
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙ
ﯽ ﺣﺴﻴ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﻣﺤﻋﻠﻤﺪ
ﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥﻤﺎﺩ
ﺘﻤﺎﮋﺍﺯ
ﺯﻥ
ﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﻥ
ﺴﺑﺮﺍﻧﺘﻋﮋﺍ
ﺣﻤﺪی
ی
ﺯﺭﺍی
یﺮ ﻧﺭﻴ
ﺪﺎﺍﻋﺍ
ﻣﺤﺤﺯﻤﻭﻓﻐﻣﻧ
ﺭﺍﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍی ﻐﻭ
ی
ﺑﺎﺩیﻭﺍﺭ
ﻟﺖﺎ
ﺏ
ﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﺎﺕ
ﺑﺎﺕ
ﺣ
ﻭﺯﯾﺮﺍﻥﺮﺍ ﺍﻓ
ﻥﺑ
ﺨﺎﺩ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺁﺎﻭﺘ
ﻋﻠﯽﺁﺮﺍ ﺩ
ﮐﻢﺯﯾﻭ ﺘﺩﺗﺎ
ﺗﺎ
ﺳ
ﺳﺮﻧ
ﻠﯽ
ﯽ ﻋﻮ
ی
ﻮیﺑﺮ
ﺑﺮ
ﺐﺩﺭ
ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ
ﻢ
ﻣﻮﺳﺑ
ﺳﮐﻮﺎ
ﻝ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻘ
ﺲ
ﻧﺲ
ﻻﻠ
ﺋﺒﻪﻧﺑ
ﻟﺖﻨﻪ
ﺠ
ﺷﺎﺷﺎﻣﺗ
ﺟﻭﺋ
ﺩﺍﺯﺍﺯ ﺷﺩﺒ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﯽ :
ﯽ
|Ì¿Y
|Ì¿YÂy
ﺍﺳﻼ ﻣ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ
Ây
ﻫﺎیﺍﻩ
ﻫﺎی
ﺼﺎﻮﺩﺩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺧ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
ﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ
Ê
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﻢ
ﺸﻮﺭ
ﺍﻗﺘ
Êﻮﺭ
ﮐﺸﺩﺮﻪﺮ
ﺑﻴﻨﺑ
ﻮﺭﮐﺑ
ﻫﺎی
ﻫﺎی»
ﻮﺭ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﯾﻢ؟
¼ÃZ
ﺁﻥ
»ﺗ
ﺟﻤﻬﮐﺎ
ÃZ
ﺟﻤﻬ
ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ی
ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺍﯾﺎﻥﺑﺎﺯﺯ
¼ ﺑﺎ
¾ËY
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﻧﯽﻭﺮ
ﻮﯾﻖ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎی
ﻖ
ﻟﮕﺮﯽﻭﺮ
ﮕﮕ
ﻬﺎ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷ
ﺗﻌﻮﯾ
ﮔﺮﺩﺷ
ﺗﻌﻬﻮﻮﻧﺎ
¾
ﺍﺻﺟ
{
ﺳﻬﻢ
ﮕﺎﻩﺩ
ﺩﻻﯾﻞ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺍﺻ
ﺟ
ﻬﻢ
ﺭﮐﻮﺩ
ﺭﮐﻮ
ﺑﺎﺷﺍﺍ
ﭼﺮ
ﺳ
{ﭼﺮËY
{|¿{Y
ÉZÅ
§Ã|À^Ë
Ã| Á
Ã{a
YÁa
Ã{a da
YÁa
da
{ÊZ¼¸bË
ﺷﺪﻥﻫﻢ
ﺖ
ﺮﯾﻊﺯﯾﺍ ﻟﺮﺴﻴﺩ ﻟﻭﺮ ﺩ
ﻴﻎﻭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲﻟﺒﺑﺯﺍﺳﺗﻪﻪﺩ 18
ﺑﺮﺍیﺁ
ﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﺭﻭ
ﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻋﺘﻤﺎﯽﺩ ﻫﺎ
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺩﺍﻧﺎﺍ
ﺍی ﺩﺍﺭ
ﻮﻝ
14
ﺭﭘ
¦Ëv|eÉZm
ÌZ]Ä]´zZa
»ZÌ¿: \nfÀ
ËZ«Á
ÃZ
ﺣﮑﻴﻢ
| ﺪﺍZﻥ^»µ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﯽ ﻧﺯ ﺪﮔﯽﺧ ﻧﺎ
ﺑﻪ
Z]:ÊËZÅ ³Á d¨³
]±]Ã|¿Z
ﺧ ﺸﻧﻤ ﻧﺎﻴﻦ
ﯽ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﻣﺠﻴﺪﺩﺭ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﻓﺮ -
ی
ﻴﻢ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭ
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴ ﻦﺣﮑ -
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪی -
ﺒﺎﺱﻤ ﯽ -
ﻣﺤﻋﻤﺪﻫﺎﺷ
{Â
¼ ÂÆ
: Êm ¼ÌÅ
Y]Y
ÌWº
¹ ÅÔÓY
Éd
Æ
»nu
¯Ê ] Ô¬ ¿Y Ä¿Z y Z
ﮐﻮﻫﮑ-ﻦ-
ﺤﺴﻦ ﻮﻫ ﮑ
ﻦ
ﻦ
ﻣ ﻣﺤﺴ ﮐ
ﺩﺭ
ﺻﻔ ﺤ ﻪ 1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎ ﻥ
ﺷ ﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﭘﻨﺠ ﻢ15 /ﺷﻬ ﺮﯾﻮﺭ 116 /138 8
ﻱ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭ ﻝ /
]، {Â
ZËÁﺮ
®ﻧﺎﻣ ﻪﺧﺒ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
Ë
ﺷﺸﻢ 22ﺷﻬ ﺮ ﯾﻮﺭ 116 /138 8ﺻﻔ ﺤ/ﻪ 1000ﺗ ﻮﻣﺎ ﻥ
/
¯Àﺳﺎ|ﻝ ﺍﻭ ﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/Ê
، Y
ﻧﺎﻣﻪÉﺧﺒ¿ ﺮ
ﻫﻔﺘ ﻪ
¶
ﻱ{ ¼ »
¼|
»uY¶ j
¯ ZÀ
]{ ºËY
:½ ZËn
½ {Z
»½Z³
|a
ﺣﮑﻴﻢÃ
ﺧ ﻧﺎµﺪﺍ»^ﻥZ
ﺪﮔﯽZ
ﻧ ﮕﺎﻫﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺯ |
ÓÂ
¯« aZ
]Á »fe{Ã Z
{ Â
§º
§É¸Ì
¾ Y
à |¿Á
Ë yM
a
زﻧﻲ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖﻋ ﻠﻲ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ
ﮔﻤ ﻧﺎ ﻪ
ﯽ ﺭﻫﺒ ﺮ
ﻤﺪ ﺗﺗﻘﻘﯽ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﺤ
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ «
ﯽ
ﻫﺎی
ﺖﺩﺭ
ISSN:
ﺍﻥ
ﺪ
ﻧﺎﻣﺑﻪﻪﻧ
ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤ
ﺴﺘﺯﺮﺍﯾﺮﺑﻴﻪ
ﺍی
2008ﺗﺭﻭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻫﺎی
ﺩﺭ ﻫ»
-5281ﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺁﺳﺘﻘﻧﺎﻟﺎ
ﺳﺮﻣﺮﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑ
ﺩﺭ
Mﺩﺭ
ﺑﺰﺭگﻪ
ﯽ
OSALAﻧﺎﯽ
ﯽ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﮔ
ﻤﻴﺎﯾﻧﺎ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻤ
ﯽ
ﮔﻔﺘﻧﺎ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺗﮑﺩ
ﮐﻴ
.SIRﺎﯾ
ﻧﻪ
ﺁﻣﺮﯾﮑ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﺧﺎ
ﺮﻭﺯی
ﯽ
ﻓﻀ ﺎﺋﻘ
ﯾﻠ
ﻴﺪﺑﻬﻓﺎ
ﻬﺪیﺮﯾﻢ
ﺳﻌ
ﺩی ﻣ
ﻮﺭﻭﻣ-
ﻧﮕﻨﺁﺑﺎﻪ
ﻋﻠﻴﭙ
ﻋﻠﯽ
ﮋﻥﻡ ﺯ
ﻻﺳﻼ
ﻤﺪ
ﻣﺤ -ﺑﻴ
ﺣﺠﺖ ﯽﺍ
ﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻙﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺣﺍﺯﻭ ﺗﺮﻗ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﻋﻠﯽ ﮐﺮﯾﻤﯽ ﻓﻴﺮﻭﺯﺟﺎﯾﯽ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻃﺒﻴﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ ﻧﺼﻴﺮی ،ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﯽ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﯽ ﺷﻬﺮﯾﺎﺭی
¿^½ÂÌZÌ Ä] |ËZ
ºË{¯Ö» {Z¼fY
ISSN: 2008-5281
|¿YÂeʼ¿ Z°Ë»M : ÉYy
´:Âa
{|ÌÀ¯ [Yy Y ÀÅ Á d·Á{½ZÌ» Õ{Z¼fY Ö]YÂË
]±] Ã|¿Z
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
M OSALA .SIR
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺍﺯﺍﻗﻌﻴ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯﻭ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚﺩﺭ؛ ﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ؛
¦Ëve
]|ÌZ
ÉZm
]Ä
´zZa
»: ZÌ¿ \nfÀ
ËZ«Á
»«Á fe
ÓÂa
]Z¯{Ã Z
§Â §º¸Ì
¾{ É
¿| ÃY
ËÁyM
a
ﺁﺑ ﺎﺩﻱ
ﮔﻤ ﻧﺎ ﻪ زﻧﻲ ﭘﻴ ﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺗﻘﯽ ﺭﻫﺒ ﺮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﯽ
ﻤﺪ
ﻣﺤ ﺗﻘ
ﺑﺎﻥ
ﻫﺎیﺧﻴﺎ «
ﺍﯾﺮﺍﻥ ﯽ
ﺩﺭﻪ
ﺪ
ISSN:ﻧ
ﺍیﻤﻣﺑ
ﻣﺤﺎﮐ
ﺖ
2008ﺮﻪﺑﻴﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻫﺴﺘﺗ
ﺁﺳﺘ ﻧﺎ ﻪ»
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻫﺎی
-5281
ﻟﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺮﻣﺮﺩﺭﻘ ﺎ
ﯽﺩ ﺑ
ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﻣﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ
ﻤﻴﺎﯾﻧﺎ
M
OSALAﻧﺎﻤﻪ
ﯾﯽ
ﻧﯽ
ﮔﻔﻴﮔﺘ
ﺩﻭ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﺎﮐ
ﺗﮑﺩ
ﺮﯾﮑ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺴﻌﻮ
ﻣﺧﺁﻣﻧﺎS.IRﻪ
]:Z
ﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﯽ
ﯽﻧﺎ
ÊËZųÁﺸ
ﺧ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﻴﻢﻓ-ﺮ -
ﺳﺘﺎﺭی
d¨³ﮑ
ﻦﺣ
ﻣﺤﺴﻤﺪ
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤ
ﺁﺧﻮﯽ-ﻧﺪی -
ﻫﺎﺷﻤ
ﻣﺤ ﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺷﺪﻥﻫﻢ
ﻭﺯﯾ ﺩﺮ ﻟﻭ ﺖﺩ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴ
18ﺗﻴﻎ
ﺮﯾﻊ
ﺳ ﻪﺩﻟﺒﻪ
ﺍیﺁ ﺑﺯﺍ
ﺑﺮﺭﻭی
ﺲ
ﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻧﯽﻣﺠﻠﻫﺎ
ﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﺳﺎﻝﺎﺍ ﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺴﻨﺠ
14ﺍﻋ
ﻮﻝ
ﭘﺭﻓﺭ ﺍی
ﺮﻭﺯی
ﯽ
ﻓﺎﺋﻘ
ﻌﻴﺪﯾﻠﻬ ﯽ
ﺮﯾﻢﻀ ﺎﺑ
ﻬﺪی
یﻭﻣﻣ -ﺳﻓ
ﻧﮕﻨﻪ
ﯽ ﺯﺁﻮﺭﺑﺎ ﺩ
ﮋﻥ
ﻤﺪﻡﻋﻠﻴﭙ
ﻻﺳﻼ-ﺑﻴﻋﻠ
ﻣﺤ
ﺗﺮﻗﯽ
ﺣﺠﺖ
ﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍ
ﺍﺯﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴ ﺖ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ؛ ﺩﺭ ﻙ ﺣ
M OSALAS.IR
: ÊËZÅ
]Y Zf¨³ Z
ﯽ ﺪﻘ ﻡ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺼﺒﺎﺣ ﻣ
ﺼﺒ ﺣ
ﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎﻣﻣ ﺎ
ﻏﻏﻼﻣﺮ ﺿﺎ
ﺍﺯﻩﺍﺯﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﻭﺍﻗﻌ ﻴ
ﺖ
ﻙ ﺗﺎﺯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺚﺩﺭ ﺭ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ؛ﺩ
ﻣ ﺜﻠ
ISSN: 20 08-5281
ﺼﻴﺮﻴﭙﻮ ﺎ
ﻥ
ﻮﺯﯾﺎﻥﺩ
ﻕﻮﺭﺮ
یﯾ
ﯽ
ﺻﺎﺩ
ﺼﺮﺎ
ﺟﻮ
ﺻ
ﺳ
ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﯾﺍﯾ
ﺭﺟﺎﯾ
ﻭﺩﺯﭙ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳ ﺭﻭ
ﷲﻣﻧﺭ
ﺎﺱ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱﮐ
ی
ﻣﻬﺪیﻋﺒ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﻮﺭﻴﺗﺎ
ﺮی
ﮐﺎﺗﻮ
ﺪﺍﺪ ﻧ
ﺿﺎ
ﺭﺿﺎﻬﻠ
ﯽ
ﻋﺴﮕﻌﺮ
ی
ﺳ
ﺪ-ﺭﺒﻋﻣﻌ
ﮕﻠ
ﻋﻠ
ﺴ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ-
ﺳ-
ﻧﯽ-ﻴ
ﯽ--ﻋﻤ
ﻫﻠﻮی-ﻡ
ﮐﻼﻡ
ﻮی
ﺭﺣﻤ-ﺣﺎﻤ
ﯽ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻼ
ﻴﻨ
ﻼ-
ﺣﺭ
ﺒﺎﻨﻴﻣ
ﺣﺴﻫﻠﺩﮐﺒﺎ
ﻨﻮﻧﺪ-
ﺳﺪ
ﻢ
ﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺩﻕﺴ
ﺯﯾﯾ
ﻦﺍﻨﻧﻮﻦﺯ
ﺳﺎ
ﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣ
ﻕﺩ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﺩ
ﺴﻴ
ﺻﺎ
ﺣﺴ
ﺴ
ﺤﺴ
ﺻﺎﻮﻤﺎﻘﻟﻮﺍ
ﺣﺣ
ﻥ
ﺪﺑﻣﺍ
ﺭﺿﺎﻣﻋ
ﺪﺿﺎ
ﻓﺮﯾﺪﻭﻭ
ﺤﺤﻤﻤﺪﺮﯾﺪﺭﺳﻴ
ﻣﻣ ﻓ
ﺭﺍﻣﻴ ﻦ
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ ﻣﻴ
ﺥ
ﺷﺎ ﺮ ﺭﺍ
ﯽﻮﺯ ﻫ
ﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮ-ﺶ
ﻨﺶﻌ
ﯽ-
ﻴﺎﻥﻴﻌ
ﻥ
ﺷﻔﻣﯽﺴﻔﻴ
ﻦﺭﻬﻨﺎﻔﻴ
ﺷﻧﻣ
ﻼﺯﻫی
ﻮﺳﻔﻫ
ﺟ
ﻧﻮﺫ
ﺁﺭﯾ
ﺳﻮﺭ
ﻣﻼ
ﺟﯾ
ﺿﺎﺭ
ﺼﺎﺫﺎ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣ
ﷲ
ﺍﷲ
ﺿﺩﺭ-ﺁﯾ
ﻤﺪﺭﺼﺍﻧ
ﺪ ﻧﺍ-
ﻋﺰﺕﺍﻮﺍﻤ
ﺰﺕ
ﺪﺍ
ﺟﻮﻤ
ﯽ
ی
ﻣﺤﺤﻣ
ﻣﺤ-
ﺟ
ﻋﻠﻋ
ﺗﺸﮑﺮ-ﻠ
ﯽ-ﻋ--ﮑﺮ
ﺸ
ﯽ--
ﯽ
ﺮﻣ
ﻥﺮ-
ﻤﺎﻥﺎ
ﯽﺗﻣ
ﺪ
ﻘﺪﺳ
ﻫﺪﺍﯾﺘﺳ
ﻴﺐ
ﮐﺎﻇﻢﺘﯾﺍﮐ
ﻢﺍ
ﺷﮐﻤﯾ
ﻫﺎﺩیﻘﻤ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤ
ﻧﺮﯾﻣ
ﺪﺍ
ﻦﻧﻇﻣ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺷﮑﺎﻫﺮ
ی
ﺷ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦﮑ
ﻦ
ﺤﺴﻫ
ﺪﮐﺎ
ﺳﻴﺪ
ی
ﺴﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎﺩ
ﻣﻬﺪﺳﻴ
ﺪ
ﺣﻤﺰﻬ
ﺣ
ﻣﻣ ﻤ
ﺷﺎﺩﮔﺮ
ﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮ
ﺪ؟
ﮐﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﻕ
ﻻﮐﻨ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﺩ
ﺳ
ﺭﺕﺍ
ﺍﺭﺕ
ﺤ
ﻣﯽ ﺭ
ﺿﺎﻓﻣ
ﯽ
ﺁﻝﻮ
ﻝ
ﭼﻪﺭﻭﻓﺯ ﺍ
ﺿﺎ
ﭼﻪ
ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪﺁ
ﯽﻭ
ﻤﻴﺪﺯﺍ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵﺭ
ﺤﯾﺪ
ﺵ
ﺤﻴﻨﺰ
ﺩﺭ -ﯾﺯﺍﺯﮔﻤﻭﺭﻴﺯﺣ ﻴ
ﻥﺩﺭ
ﯽﺣ
ﺍﺭﺍﻥﺎﯾﯽ--ﺍﯾ
ی
ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺭﺍ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻪﻫ
ﺮﻣﺎﯾﻪﺮ ﻗﺩ
ﻮﺵﺮﻣﻨﺒﺻﺎﺩﺘﻔﺩﺍﻨﺒﻪ
ﺭﯾﻮﺵ
ﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪﮔﻧﻧﺎﺎﯾﻗ
ﻼءﻣﻴﺩﺍ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺭﯾﺤﻤﺳﺳﻗﺪ
ﻋ ﻼءﻋ ﻴﻣ
| Àf:: Z]Z]Ì¿ÊËZųÁ
¿|ÀfÌ
ÊËt¸Y
Z ųÁd¨³
d¨³
100ﺤ ﻪ 1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺷﻬ ﺮ ﯾﻮﺭ /1388ﺻﻔ
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ /م 8
ﻱ ﺗ ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎ ﻝﺍﻭ ﻝ /
ﻫﻔﺘ ﻪﺧﺒﺮ ،
ﻧﺎﻣ
ÉZÅ Ê]Ó
{|Å
¼Ä] Ê
»¸n
¿É¿ Y: º·ZZ
Ê·Ô m
ﮐﻨﻨ®ﻨ
ﺪ
Ë]Y
ﻣﯽﮐ
ﯾﯽ ﯽ
ﯽ
{]ﻣ
ﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎ
ﺖ ﺑ 8ﺰﺭﮔ1 6ﺎﯾﻨﻤ
ﻫﺎیﺩ ﺑ
ی ﺩ ﻟﻭ
ﺳﺎﺳ ﻧﺎ ﻪﻫﺎ
{ºÅﻧﻪ
ﯽﺭ ﺭ
ﻭﻗﺘﯽ
»Ê
Ì̤ﺘﻗ
ZfyZﻭ
eY Ä¿ZzeYÁ
: ÊÀÌu
ﺗﻮﻣﺎ
ﻥ
MOSALAS.IR
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩﻣﻮﻣﻨ ﯽ
،
ﺧ ﺮﻡ،ﻫﺎﺩیﻗ ﻮﺍﻣ ﯽ
،ﻋﻠ ﯽ
ﺮﻡ،ﺩی ﻗ ﻮﺍﻣ ﯽ
،ﻋﻠ ﯽ ﺧ ﻫﺎ
،ﻋﻠ ﯽ ﺧ ﺮﻡ ،ﻫﺎ ﺩیﻗ ﻮﺍﻣﯽ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﮔﺎﻥ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﺬﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲﻛﺮﺩ
ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ
ﻭ ﭘﺸﻴﻤﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻴﺰﺩﻫﻢ 10/ﺁﺑﺎﻥ 100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺸﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
30ﺳـﺎﻟﮕﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﻃﻼﯾﯽ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪی
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﯽ ﻃﻼﯾﯽ،
ﻣﺴﺠﺪﺟﺎﻣﻌﯽ ،ﺣﺴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﯽ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻣﺴﺠﺪﺟﺎﻣﻌﯽ،
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺏ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﯽ ،ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﯽ
ﻃﺒﺎ ،ﻟﻄﻒﺍﷲ ﻓﺮﻭﺯﻧﺪﻩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﯽﻃﺒﺎ،
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩیﺷﻤﺴﻰ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺯﯾﺒﺎﮐﻼﻡ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﻴﮕﯽ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻗﺎﺩﺭی
MOSALAS.IR
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺩﻫﻢ 17/ﺁﺑﺎﻥ 100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
،ﻓﺮﺷﺎ ﻣﺩ ﻮﻣﻨﯽ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ
ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ
ﻻﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﺳﻮﺳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺭﺿﺎ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ:ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﺮﺣﻢ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻡ
ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻔﻜﺮ :ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ 68ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﺧﻮﺋﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺕ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ
MOSALAS.IR
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ /ﺍﻭﻝﺁﺫﺭ 100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺟﻬﺮﻣﯽ :ﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏﺣﻖ
ﯿﺴﺖ،ﺣﻖﺿﺎ ﻊﮐﻦ ﺳﺖ
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﯿﺎﺱ ﺎﺩﺭ ﻥ :ﮕﺎﻩ
ﻣﺪ ﺮ ﻥﺳﯿﻤﺎ» ﺎﺯ« ﺎﺷﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖ و ﮔﻮ ﺎ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﯿﻤﯿﺎﯾﯽ ﺩﺭ ﺎﺭﻩ
ﺁﺧﺮﯾﻦ ﻓﯿﻠﻢ ﺍﺵ
ﻣﺤﺎﮐﻤﻪ
ﮐﯿﻤﯿﺎﯾﯽ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﯾﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﯽﺧﻮﺍ ﯿﺪ:
ﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺪﻫ ی ﺿﺮﻏ ﻣﯽ ﺩﺭ 5ﺳ ﻝ ﺩﻭﻡ
ﺁﺭ ﺶ ﺳﻴ ﺳﯽ ﺒﻨ ﻥ ﺲ ﺯ ﺸﮑﻴﻞ ﮐ ﻴﻨﻪ ﺣﺮ ﺮی
ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﮐﺮﺩﻥ ﺭ ﻪﻫ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﮐ ﺭﮔﺮ ﻥ
ﺩ ﺳﺘ ﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻩ ﺭ ﻄﻪ ﺳﻴ ﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻼﻕ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺧﻼﻗﯽ ﻭ ﻣﺨ ﻔ ﺶ
ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﺎ :
ﻋﻤ ﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻍ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺩﻫﻘ ﻥ -ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿ ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﺨ ﯽ -ﻣﺮ ﻢ ﻬﺮﻭﺯی -ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻘﻴﻤﯽ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻮﺵﺁ ﺩی -ﺟﻮ ﺩ ﺟﻬ ﮕﻴﺮﺯ ﺩﻩ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺮ ﯽ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻮﺭ ﻥ -ﺳﻤ ﻋﻴﻞ ﺸﺮی
ﻋﺰ ﺰ ﷲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪی -ﻣﺠﺘﺒﯽ ﺷﺮ ﻔﯽ
ﯾﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﺍﺯ:
ﻣﺮ ﻀﯽﻃﻼ ﯽ-ﺣﺴﻦﺳﺒﺤ ﯽ ﻴ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﯽﮐﻮ ﮐﺒﻴ ﻥ-ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺰﺷﮑﻴ ﻥ
ﻮ ﻘ ﺳﻢﺭ ﻮﻓﻴ ﻥ-ﺩ ﺭ ﻮﺵﻗﻨﺒﺮی-ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺻ ﺩﻕﮐﻮﺷﮑﯽ
ﻓﻮ ﺩﺻ ﺩﻗﯽ-ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺳﺠ ﺩ ﻮﺭ-ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿ ﮏ
ﺭﺿ ﺰﺩ ﯽ-ﻋﺒﺪ ﺮﺣﻤﻦﺷ ﻩﺣﺴﻴﻨﯽ
{:| Ì¿YÂyÊ»ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
´Á Âa
{: |Ì¿YÂyʻà Z¼¾ ËY
{:| Ì¿YÂy Ê »ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
3
ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻚ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ
ﺷـﺎﻣﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﺷـﻨﺒﻪ 18ﺁﺑـﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈـﺎﺭ
136ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﻣـﺮﺩﻡ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤـﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻰ ﭘﺎﻳـﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓـﺖ ﻭ
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﻟﺤﺮﻳﺮﻯ ،ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ،
ﺭﺳﻤﺎ ﺷـﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ.
35
44
72
ﻏﺬﺍﻱ ﺣﻼﻝ
ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﻓﺎﺿﻠﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ 26ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺴـﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ 2020ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻰ،ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻭﺍﺧﻼﻕﺭﺍﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺗﻠﻘﻰﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪﻭﺑﺎﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
28ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﻰﺭﺳـﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳـﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ-ﺷﺎﻩﻳﻮﻧﺎﻧﻰ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﺷﺎﻫﻰ-ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﺸﻬﺮﻯ،ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪﻓﺎﺿﻠﻪﺧﻮﺩﺭﺍ
ﻏﺬﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺧﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ16.........................................................
ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ18..........................................................
ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ،ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ20...................................................................
ﻧﻤﺮﻩ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ 15ﺑﻮﺩ21...................................................
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ22......................................................
ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ23...............................................................
ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ24......................................
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ25.................
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ26.................................................
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ28.............................................
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ29...........................................................
ﺍﺯ ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻧﻚ30................................................................................
ﺑﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ،ﺳﻔﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ32....................................................
ﻣﺮگ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ33...............................................................................
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫــﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫــﺎﻯ ﺧﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮگﺭﻳﺰﺍﻧﻰ ﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻯ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺳﺨﺘﻜﻮﺵﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨــﺎﻥ ﮔﻼﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻮﺷــﻪ ﻭ ﻛﻨــﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺗــﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ.
ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ44......................................................................
ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺣﻖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺣﻖ ﺿﺎﻳﻊﻛﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ46.................................
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ49.......................................................
ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻌﻢ ﺑﻰﭘﻮﻟﻰ52...........................................................
ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺟﺐﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ54.................
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺣﻼﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ56..........................................................
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﻗﻴﺼﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻠﻚ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ59.........................................................................
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ63......................................................................
ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻣﻨﺠﻤﺪ64..................................................................................
ﺩﺭﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻩ ،ﺗﻮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺕ ﻧﻴﺎﺭ!65......................................................
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻰ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺕ66.................................
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ70.............................................................
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺸــﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ 15ﻛﺮﺳــﻰ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺳــﻌﺪ
ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ 10 ،ﻛﺮﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ 5ﻛﺮﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻴﺸﻞ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻌﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﻬﻤﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺟﻤﻊ ﺍﺿﺪﺍﺩ36...........................................................................
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ37 ..................................................
ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ38...............................................
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ39.........................................................................
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ40.......................................................................
ﻫﻢﺻﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ42................................................................
ﻣﺮﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ
ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻗــﻲ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ
ﻣﺮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ.
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻦ72................................................................
ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ،ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺗﺒﻰ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ73.............................................
ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ75..................................................
ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ؟76.........................................................
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﻓﺎﺿﻠﻪ ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪﻧﺼﻴﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﮕﺮﺍ78....................................
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ« ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺠﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻓﺎﺭﻍ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻴﻔﻲ ،ﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﺵ ﺷﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺭﺧﻮﺕﺁﻟﻮﺩ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﺒﻠﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﺮ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺤﻜﻤﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﺮﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻗﺎﺿﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺨﺸﺶ ﺷﺎﻛﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ58.....................................................................
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ
ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ :ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﺮ
ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺳﺮﺩﺑﻴﺮﻯ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮﻳﻪ:
ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺷﻮﻗﻲ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﻴﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ :ﺑﻬﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻬﺮﺟﻮ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ :ﺑﺎﺑﻚ ﻏﻔﻮﺭﻱﺁﺫﺭ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ :ﺳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻮﺭﻭﺯﻱ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻋﻜﺲ :ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮﻳﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ :ﺳﺠﺎﺩ ﺳﺎﻟﻚ -ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ -ﺁﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ -ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻩ ﺷﻔﻴﻌﻲ
ﺭﻭﺯﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﺪﺍﺭﻱ -ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺯﺍﺭﻉ -ﺍﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻰ -ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺍﻓﻀﻠﻲ -ﺯﻫﺮﺍ ﻛﻠﻬﺮﻱ
ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﭘﻮﺭ -ﻟﻴﻼ ﻟﻄﻔﻲ -ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﻳﻲ -ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻓﺘﺤﻲ -ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻃﺎﻫﺒﺎﺯ -ﺳﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻲ -ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ
ﻣﻮﻧﺎ ﻗﺎﺳﻤﻴﺎﻥ -ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ -ﻫﻮﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻱ -ﺁﺗﻮﺳﺎ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻴﺎﻥ -ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥ -ﺳﻴﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﻣﻴﺮﺧﻠﻴﻠﻲ
ﺁﺭﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﺭﻭﺧﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ -ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺧﻠﻴﻔﻪ -ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺭﺑﻮﺷﻪ -ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺣﺴﻨﻰ
ﻓﻨﻲ:
ﮔﺮﺍﻓﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺻﻔﺤﻪﺁﺭﺍﻳﻲ :ﻧﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻠﻚﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ -ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻲ -ﺣﺴﺎﻡ ﺳﻬﺎﻣﻲ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ :ﻫﻮﻣﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻴﺎﻥ
ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ :ژﻳﻼ ﺷﺎﻛﺮﻱ
ﺣﺮﻭﻓﭽﻴﻨﻲ :ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺣﺸﻤﺘﻲ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ :ﺳﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﻣﻨﻲ -ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻗﻠﻲﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ :ﺑﻴﺘﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺎ
ﺑﺎﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﺯ :ﺍﻳﺮﺝ ﺭﺳﺘﮕﺎﺭ-ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺻﺎﻟﺢ-ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﻱ-ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺭﺩﺍﺭ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ :ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ:ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﺴﺮﻭﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ :ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﻧﺠﻲﭘﻮﺭ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺷﻮﻗﻲ
94
ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ
ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥ 32ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓﺮ ﻛﻪ 48ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ 18ﻋﺼﺮ ﺳﻪﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻣﺒﻮﺭگ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺴـﺮﺩﮔﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﺷـﺪ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﺯﺩ.
ﭼﺎپ
ﭼﺎپ :ﺭﻭﺍﻕ
ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ :ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻲ :ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻔﺖ ﺗﻴﺮ ،ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﺘﺢ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ،ﻧﺒﺶ ﻛﻮﭼﻪ ﻣﺒﻴﻨﻲ ،ﭘﻼﻙ ،121ﻭﺍﺣﺪ 11
ﺗﻠﻔﻦ88140544 :
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺳﺮﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻧﺶ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻧﺸــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻚ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ 18ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ!80.......................................
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﭼﻪﻛﺎﺭ؟!82...........................
ﻣﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺮﺩ84........................
ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ85...................................................
ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ86........................
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻧﺶ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ
ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ
»ﻣﺜﻠﺚ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
30008312
SMSﻛﻨﻴﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺮﻉ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﺟﺰﻭﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ
ﺷﻮﻳﺪ
ﻋﻜﺲ :ﺭﺿﺎ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻱ
ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺷــﺪ .ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺪﻋﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻛﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺑﻴﺖ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻢﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺷﺪ؟88..............................................................
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ89............................................................
ﻣﺎ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ90...............................................
ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺑﻄﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ91.........................................................
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ92............................
ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ؛ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ 94...............................................................18:30
ﺗﺼﻴﻴﺢ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺒﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮﻱ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻠﻲ ،ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺎﺏ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻋﻜﺲ :ﺍﺭﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺪﻩ
ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻱ
ﺷﺸﻤﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ 23ﺗﺎ 27ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺍﺗﻤﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺳــﻮﺧﺖ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺪﻥ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺟﻮﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ
ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻓﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﻫﻤﻮﻃﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺼﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
6
7
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﻋﻜﺲ:ﺣﺴﻦ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﻲ
ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺩﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺩﻻﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻴﺮﻭﺱ ﺍﻟﻮﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ 14ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺵ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺧﺴــﺘﻪ ﺩﻻﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺪ ﺳــﻌﻴﺪ ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳــﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ؛ﻗﻄﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻲﺍﻳﺴﺘﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻮﺍﺭﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﭘﺨﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﮔﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
8
9
ﺻﻨﻌﺖ
ﻋﻜﺲ :ﺯﻫﺮﺍ ﻧﺠﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻓﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻱ ﻣﺎﻩ
ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺗﻮﺩﻳﻊ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻗﻠﻌﻪﺑﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻫﺠﺪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﺗﻮﺩﻳﻌﺶ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻱ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ.ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻟﻐﻮ ﻣﺮﺍﺳــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘــﺪﺍﻱ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ،ﺗﻮﺩﻳﻊ
ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻓﻪ ﺭﻭﺳــﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺗﻢ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﻴﺎء ،ﺭﻭﺳﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﺪﺭﻭ ،ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻗﻠﻌﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻲ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻟﻐﻮ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﻋﺬﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﺎﻥ
ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
10
11
ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎ
ﻓﻘﻴﻪﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺮﺗﻀﻲ ﻧﺠﻮﻣﻲ ،ﻣﺠﺘﻬﺪ ،ﻣﻔﺴﺮ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﺎﺧﺮ ﺧﻮﺷﻨﻮﻳﺴﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ
ﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻧﺸﺎﻩ ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺖ .ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺮﺗﻀﻲ ﻧﺠﻮﻣﻲ ،ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺁﻗﺎﺳﻴﺪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﻧﺠﻮﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1307ﻫﺠﺮﻱ ﺷﻤﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻧﺸﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ،
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1322ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺩﺭﻭﺱ ﺣﻮﺯﻭﻱ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ .ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻧﺠﻮﻣﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺗﺶ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ» :ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻣﻨﺰﻝ ﻭﺍﻟﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺷﺮ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻼﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺰﻳﻤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺘﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﻘﺪﺳــﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺍﺷــﺮﻑ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻢ« .ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1369ﻫﺠﺮﻱ ﻗﻤﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﻧﺎﺋﻞ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺎﻡ،
ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺱ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺣﻀﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻳﺎﺕ ﺁﻗﺎﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﺎﻗﺮ ﺯﻧﺠﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺷــﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ،
ﺣﺎﺝﺁﻗﺎ ﻣﺤﺴــﻦ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺝﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺷــﺎﻫﺮﻭﺩﻱ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺁﻗﺎ ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﺎﻗﺮ ﺯﻧﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻧﺠﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻳﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺧﻮﺷﻨﻮﻳﺴﻲ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻱ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺧﻄﺎﻃﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻫﺎﺷــﻢ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻧﺠﻔﻲ ﺑﻪﺗﻤﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻤﺎﺭﺳــﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧــﺖ .ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﻧﺴــﺦ ﻭ ﺛﻠﺚ ،ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻫﻤﺘﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺬﻫﻴﺐ ﻭ ﺗﺸــﻌﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺟﻠﻴﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺗﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﭼﻴﺮﻩﺩﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻡﺁﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺳﺎﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻧﺸﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﻲ
ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣــﺖ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻭ ﺑــﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ،
ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸــﺒﺮﺩ ﻫﺪﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ،ﺗﻼﺵ ﺍﺭﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺻﺮﺍﻁ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﭘﺎﻱ ﻓﺸﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺯﺣﻤﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ« .
12
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ؟
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺍﺩﻋﻰ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺣﺎﺩﺛــﻪ ﺗﻠﺦ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ
ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺿﻲ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ ﺷﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺭﺍﺩﺍﻥ ،ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻧﺎﺟﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺒــﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋــﻼﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﺿﻰ ﻭﻳــﮋﻩ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺎﺕ
ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿــﺎ ﺭﺍﺩﺍﻥ ،ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﺎﺋﻢﻣﻘﺎﻡ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺟــﺪﻯ ﺑــﻪ ﭘﺮﻭﻧــﺪﻩ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺎﺕ
ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻬﺮﻳــﺰﻙ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻣﻰ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺮ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ
ﺑﻪﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﻃﻴﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﻭﻧــﺪﻩ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﺎﺟﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺭﺍﺩﺍﻥ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﺎﺗﻰ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻠﺘﻬﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ
ﺍﺣﻀﺎﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ
ﻧﺸﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﻭﻯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻠﺘﻬﺐ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺷــﻨﻮﻡ «.ﮔﻔﺘﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﻪﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻜﻤﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻔﺎﻟﺖ ،ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻭﺛﻴﻘﻪ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﮔــﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺍﺩﻋﻰ ،ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ
ﻏﻨﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻄﻨﺰ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ،
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺻﺪ ﺳــﺎﻧﺘﺮﻳﻔﻴﻮژ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﻂ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻧﺘﺮﻳﻔﻴﻮژﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ،
ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌــﺪﺍﺩ ﺳــﺎﻧﺘﺮﻳﻔﻴﻮژﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺎﻩ ﺁﮔﻮﺳــﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻰﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ 1763ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻏﻠﻈﺖ
3/5ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻩ
ﺁﮔﻮﺳﺖ 255ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨــﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﺸﺖﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺳﺎﻧﺘﺮﻳﻔﻴﻮژ ﻧﺼﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻊ
ﻏﻨﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻧﻄﻨﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﮔﺎﺯﺩﻫﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻫﻔﺖﺻﻔﺤﻪﺍﻯ
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﻓﺮﺩﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺳﻪ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺳﺎﻧﺘﺮﻳﻔﻴﻮژ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ،ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺳــﺎﻧﺘﺮﻳﻔﻴﻮژﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺳــﺎﻧﺘﺮﻳﻔﻴﻮژﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺍﺗﻤﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﭘﺸﺖﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﺻﻔﺎﺭ ﻫﺮﻧﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﻭﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯﻯﻫﺎ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻯ
ﻭ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻭﻯ ،ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ ﺭﺣﻴﻢﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻔﺎ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑــﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻏﻔﻠﺖﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ «.ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻯ
ﺟﻠﺴــﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﻻﺕ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻨﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱﺍﺵ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺳــﻮﺍﻻﺗﻰ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺻﻔﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻳﻜﻰ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻠﻘﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ» :ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰﺛﻤﺮﻩ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﻧﺸﻴﻨﻴﻢ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﻢ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺘﻰ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﻭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻴﺦﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﻧﻴﺎ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍژﻩﺍﻯ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻢ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍژﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺩﺭﺏ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ «.ﺻﻔﺎﺭ ﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱﺍﺵ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ.
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﻓﺎﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻃﺒﻖ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ
ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺳــﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ،
ﻣﻮﺟﺒﺎﺕ ﺗﺬﻛــﺮ ﻛﻮﭼــﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫــﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﻱ
ﻛــﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﻨــﺶ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷﺪ .ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ،
ﻛﻨﺘــﺮﻝ ﻣــﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺮﻭﺣﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻳﺒــﻮﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺣﺮﻑ ﺑﻲﻣﺒﻨــﺎ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺧﺪﺷﻪﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷــﻮﺩ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ:
»ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﻭ
ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ «.ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻏﻠﻄﻲ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻣﻄﺮﻭﺣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﻴﻜﺮﻭﻓﻦ ﻭﻯ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺷــﺪ.ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻣﻴﻜﺮﻭﻓﻦ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؛ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ .ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪﻭﻱ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ
ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ،ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ «.ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻮﭼــﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ؛ »ﭘﺲ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺳﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟« ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪ؛ »ﺁﻗﺎﻱ
ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﺿﺮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ«.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳــﻲﭘﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﺯﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ
ﭼﻪﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣﺰﻫﺎﻱﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ -ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻔﺘــﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﻔــﺎﻕ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ
ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩ .ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺑﻪﻧﺴــﺒﺖ
ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺎﻭﻧﺪﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻳﭙﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺒﺶ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻛﻮﺷــﺎ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺮگ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻳﭙﺎ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻓﺎﻣﻴﻠﻲ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﭙﺎﭼﮕﻲ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺩ ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﭘﺎﻱ
ﺗﻠﻔﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﻲﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﺶ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻰﭘﻮﺭ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺭﺵ ﻛﻮﺷﺎ ﭘﺮﺳﻴﺪ» :ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻼ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟« ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺳﺎﻳﭙﺎ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ«.
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻮﺩ ﭘﺮﺳﻴﺪ» :ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ؟« ﺁﺭﺵ
ﻛﻮﺷﺎ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ «.ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻛﻮﺷﺎ ،ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺭﺣﻴﻢﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻳﻰ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ «.ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺳﺎﻳﭙﺎ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺧﺐ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ«.
ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺑﻠﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻨﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﻳﻰ ﺷﻤﺎﺳﺖ؟« ﻛﻮﺷــﺎ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻳﻚ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺍﻳﻰ
ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ«.
13
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺣﺴﺎﺱﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ)ﺭﻩ( ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ،ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺮ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ،ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻴﺮ
ﻭ ﺷــﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ،ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻘﻠﻴــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺮﺏ ،ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺎﺑﻴﺮ
ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ
ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
»ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺷﺪ ،ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﺎﺳﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺑﺪﻫﻢ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ،
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻳﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﻋﻮﺟﺎﺝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﺮﺗﺎﺳﺮ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﻇﻔﻴﺪ ،ﻫﻢ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ -ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺗﺼﻔﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ...ﭘﺎﻓﺸﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ -ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺴﺎﺩﺵ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ
ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺳﺮﺗﺎﺳــﺮ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻄﻮﺡ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ...
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺩﻳــﻮ -ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺴــﺖ،
ﺣﺴﺎﺱﺗﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ...ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ،
ﻧﻪ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ،
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﻋﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺷﻌﺎﻋﺶ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺳﻤﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻤﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺼــﺮﻱ .ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺳــﻤﻊ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻳﺎ
ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﻬﺪﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ...
ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻡ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ -ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﮔﺮﻭﻫــﻲ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤــﺎﻡ ﺩﻫــﺎﺕ ،ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ،ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ
ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎً ﻫﺮ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
ﻣﻲ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ -ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﺘﺤﻮﻝ ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻲ ،ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻫــﻲ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ،ﺗﻮﻃﺌــﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻴﺎﻳــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻃﺌﻪﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
14
ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲ ﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﺎﻧﺴــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ
ﻭ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ...
ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺧﻼﻓﻲ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻩﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻔﻬﻤﻨﺪ ،ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻼﻓﻲ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺷﺮﻉ ،ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ -ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ
ﺟﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺳﺮﺗﺎﺳﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ -ﻳﻚ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﻣﻠﺘﻔﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﻫﻤﭽﻮ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﺴﺎﺱﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻢ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺑﺮﺁﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺧﺪﺍﻱﻧﺨﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻳﻚ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻧﻘﻴﺼﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺮﺵ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻓﻼﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺳﺮﺗﺎﺳﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ....
ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ -ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﻀﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻗﺸﺮ ﺑﺎﻻ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺣﻘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻢ
ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ -ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﺮ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳــﻢ ﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺩ،
ﺧﻮﺷــﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺷﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ...
ﻣــﻦ ﺻﺮﻳﺤﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ،ﻣــﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺷــﺮﻕ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻏﺮﺏﺯﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺪ ،ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﻢ...
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻘﻠﺪ ﺷﺮﻕ ﻭ
ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻕ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ -ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻧﻤﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﻑ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻏﺮﺏﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺑﺪﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ...
ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﻭﻫــﻲ ﺑﻪﻭﻳــﮋﻩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﻛــﺰ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﻋﻤﻮﻣــﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﺪﻣﺖﻫــﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻪﺍﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺐ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ،
ﻣﻠﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳــﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﺳــﻤﻌﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺼﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﭼﻪ
ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋــﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﺖ ﮔﻤﺎﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺗــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭ ﺗﻬﺬﻳﺐ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻗﺸﺮﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﺷــﺮﺍﻓﺘﻤﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻣﻨﺸــﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﻣﻠﺖ
ﺑﻴﺎﻣﻮﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻫــﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﺁﻣﻮﺯ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺘــﺬﻝ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﻠﺖ
ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﭘﻨﺠﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺳﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺪﺗﺮ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺭﺍﺩﻳــﻮ -ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻠﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪ ﻭﺍﻓﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻏﻮﺵ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏﺯﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻏﻠﺘﺎﻧﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺿﺮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﺍﺑﻲﻫــﺎﻱ ﺗﻮپ ،ﺗﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳــﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨــﺮﺏ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺗﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﻪ ﺿــﺮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺿﺮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴــﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑــﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﺎﻃﻊ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ،ﺧﻄﺮ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻣﺪﺕ ،ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺳﻬﻞﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ...
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺩﻗﺖ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺸﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻮﻇﻔﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺧﻮﻓﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻓﻼﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ ،ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﺭﺗﺠﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ
ﻳﻚ ﻫﻴﻮﻻﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ...
ﻏﺎﻟﺒــﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻡ
ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺜﻼ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﮔـﺎﻭ« ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻧـﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺣـﺎﻻ
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻓﻴـﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳـﺪ ﺣﺘــﻤــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜـﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘـــﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻳـﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ
ﺑﻲﺑﻨﺪﻭﺑﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﺰﺩﻩ ﺷﺎﺩ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺧــﺎﺭﺝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﺍ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻣﮕﺮ ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﺳﺖ...
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻓــﺮﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻳــﻚ ﻣﻨﻈﺮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓــﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺁﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﭽﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻜﺮ .ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻳــﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻻﺗــﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﺪ .ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺻﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺼﻔﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ
ﻭ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
www.mosalas.ir
SwIÃw
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﺮ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺯﺩ .ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﺪ.ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻴﻨﻜﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
15
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﺑﻚ
Hamidreza_abak@yahoo.com
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﺠﺎﺳــﺖ؟ ﺳــﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﭘﺮﺧﺎﺵﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺁﺑﺸﺨﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺳﺘﻰ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ 50ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻛﻤﻰ ﺑﻪﻋﻘﺐ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﺴــﻮﻑ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻒ
ﻣﻰﺯﺩﻧﺪ؟ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻢ.
ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ،ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﻮﺭﻭﻛﺮﺍﺳﻰ
ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺍﻭﺍﻣﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻧﻰ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻻﺑﻴﺮﻧﺖ ﺗﻮﺩﺭﺗﻮﻳﻰ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺨﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﺭﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻠﻮﺱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻰ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻰﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻢﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ
ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻼﺷﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ،ﭘﻴﺸﺎﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﺑﻪﺷﻜﺴﺖ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ،ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﻰ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺶﻓﺮﺽﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳــﺖ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺰﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻋﺮﻭﺱ ﺑﻰﺩﺍﻣﺎﺩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﺣﺠــﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔــﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣــﻰ ﻭ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ
»ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ« ﺑﻴﻨﺪﻳﺸﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻼﻙ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ »ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ« ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭﻳﺒﻞﻫﺎﻯ »ﻣﺴﻰ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﺳﻠﻮﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺎﻓﺒﻚﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﻓﻮﺭﻭﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ژﺍﭘﻨﻰ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻳﻚ ﺷﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺘﻞ ﻫﻴﻠﺘﻮﻥ ﺍﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﺘﻠﺪﺍﺭﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺑﺨﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺭﻗﻴﺒﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻯ ﻟﻨﮓ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻯ ﺻﺪﻣﺘﺮ ﺷﺪ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺳــﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻧــﻮﺍﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﻇﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻨﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ »ﻟﺮﻯﻛﻴﻨﮓ« ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﻳﺰ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺷــﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺨﺮﻩ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ
ﻣﺠﺮﻯﮔﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻼﻝ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﻫﻮﻟﻨﺎﻛﻰ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺗﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺴﻰ
ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ »ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻰ« ﺑﺰﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎﺭ
ﺭﺑﻄﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ :ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﻭﻧﺰﻭﺋﻼ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ؟ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺪﺭﻛﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ .ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺳﺎﭘﻜﻮ
ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭ ﻛﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺖﺑﺮﮔﺸﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺒﺢ ﻋﻠﻰﺍﻟﻄﻠﻮﻉ ﺗﺎ ﺧﺮﻭﺱﺧﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ
ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ ﺻﺪﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ ﺩﺭﺩﺳﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻊﺍﻻﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﺎﺷﻰ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳــﻰ ﭘﺮﺍﮔﻤﺎﺗﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻯ ،ﻛﻤﺮﺵ ﺧﻢ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ.
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺗﻔــﺎﻭﺕ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻴﺮﺭﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻴﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻥ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺧﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻛــﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﭘﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺎﻏﻞ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﻰ« ﺩﻭﺭ ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ؛ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﺷﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻏﺖ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﻧﺠﻮﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺳﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺎﺝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻤﻼﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ؟ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺭﺍﻫﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ.
16
ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩﺭﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
»ﺭﺋﻴﺲ«
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻫﻴﺮﺍﺩﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩﺭﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻣﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺧﻠﻮﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﺯﻥ ﺳﺎﻋﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩﺭﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻳﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻤﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧــﻲ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ .ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮ ﻋﺎﺩﺗﻲ ﺑﻪﻗﺪﻣﺖ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩﺭﻭ ﮔﺬﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪﻣﻨﺰﻝ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲﻛــﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻋﻠــﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻮﺍﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ
ﻗﻮﻩﻣﻘﻨﻨﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻮﺳــﺘﺮ ﭼﺎپ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻬﻮﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺎﻡﺟﻢ ﻛﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻴﺘﺮﻱ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩﺭﻭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻠﻮﻍﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﺟﻠﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﻭﻡ
ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﻗــﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﻏﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻛﻼﺱ ﺩﺭﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﮔــﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻛﻼﺱ ﺩﺭﺳــﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻣﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺷــﻜﻞ
ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺧﺸــﻚ ﻭ ﺗﻠﺦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﺑــﺎﺏ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻛﻞ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻼﺱ ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺳﭙﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ
ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﭼﭗ ﺗﺨﺘﻪ ﻛﻼﺱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ
ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻀــﺎﻱ ﺗﺨﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳــﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻴﺮ ﺧﻼﺹ ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺳــﻮﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺶﺁﻣﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫــﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﺧﺶﺧﺶ ﻛﺎﻏﺬﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻒ ﻛﻼﺱ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻄﻜﺎﻙ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻒ ﻛﻔﺶ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻋﻠــﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻦ ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑــﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺩﻳﻒ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦﻫﺎ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﻳﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸــﺎﻭﺭ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷﺪ .ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺯﺩﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺭﺩﺳــﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ
ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﻡ ﻣﻲﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺳﻮﻡ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﭙﺮﻱ ﺷﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﻟﻲ
ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﻳﻲ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺎﺏ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺎﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ 88ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﻗــﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﺭﻭ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺪﻡ
ﺑــﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﮔﻤﻨﺎﻡ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺸــﻬﻮﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻭ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻛﻼﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺷﻮﺏ ﺑﻪﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺑﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻒ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﺸــﻬﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﺑﻪﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌــﺮﻭﻑ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﻨﻔﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩﺭﻭ
ﺷﻠﻮﻍﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﻪﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ؟
17
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ؛ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﺻﺎﻟﺤﻴﺎﻥ
ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻃﻌﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ 5ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭽﺸﺪ.
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﮔﺬﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﺷﺮﻃﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﺁﺷﻨﺎ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﻣﻴﺮﺳﻠﻴﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﻭ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺯﻣﺰﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻨﻲ ﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺩﺭ 5ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻠﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻈﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﺍﻥ ،ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﺎﻣﻊ
ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻆ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﻲ ،ﺩﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻋﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻛﺎﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﺶ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱﻛﺸﻮﺭﺭﺍﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩﺑﻪﻣﺤﻠﻲﺑﺮﺍﻱﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻭﻣﺠﺎﺩﻟﻪﻫﺎﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞﻛﺮﺩ
ﭼﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻃﻴﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖﻛﻪﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﻲﺧﻮﺩﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻳﻚﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭ
5ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ 10ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻻﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ
ﺭﺍﺿﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ؟ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ
ﺑﺪﻫﻨــﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ 5ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑــﺎ ﻃﻴﻒﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻻﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﻴﺪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺷﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
18
ﺑﺮ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ
ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻔﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﭘﺨﺶ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻤﻼﺕ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻠﻤﺒﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﻴﻜﺲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺤﻈﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪﻛﻠﻲ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻲ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﺎﻟﺸــﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﻧﺎﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﻛﺸﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻴﻞﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺳﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻳﺎ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺝ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺳﻜﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺳﻜﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺳــﻜﻪ ،ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻜﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﻛﺸﻤﻜﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ
ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺑﻮﺩﻳــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻭﺍﻗﻌــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺗﻬﻴــﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺍﺧﺒــﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﻪﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﻮﺩ .ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ.
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ
ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞﺑﻪﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﻳﺎﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶﺩﻭﻟﺖﺭﺍﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪﻳﺎﺩﺭﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺍﺳﺒﺎﺏﻛﺸﻲﺍﺯﺍﺟﺰﺍﻱﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪﻭﺷﺎﻳﺪﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﻪﺟﻠﺐﻧﻈﺮﺁﻧﻬﺎﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ.ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥﭘﻴﺶﺍﺯﺍﻭﺑﻪﻋﻠﻲﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺩﺭﻣﺴﺎﻳﻞﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ 20:30
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ 20:30ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﺘﻔــﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﻜﺎﺵ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ
ﻣﻮﺿﻌــﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻭ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺎﺩﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻢ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﻜﺎﻥ
ﺣﻤﻼﺕ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺷﻠﻴﻚ ﺷﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ
ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥﺷﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﺸﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ.
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﻫﺎ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﻊﺑﻨﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﻓﺖ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻘﺒﻮﻻﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻮﺵ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ.
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺷﺶ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪ ﻣﺎﻫﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﮔﺮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﻫﻢ ﮔﺬﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻣﺘﻔــﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸــﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ
ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﮔــﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﺍﺗــﻲ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻔﺮﻩ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎ
ﻧﻤﻮﺩ؛ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻔﺴﮕﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻃﺎﻗﺖﻓﺮﺳﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺠﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡﺯﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺩﺳــﺮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﻨﻴﺪ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺍﺷــﻲ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﺴــﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﺍ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ
ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ؛ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺘﻲ
ﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﺻﻼﺡ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫــﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺒﻴﻪ
ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻧﺎﻃﻖ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻧﺸــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻋﺪﻡ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺪﺍﻋﻲ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻢ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ
ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺳﺦﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲﻭﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻲﺑﺮﺍﻱﺭﺍﺿﻲﻧﮕﻪﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦﺩﻭﺟﻨﺎﺡ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭﻱ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎ
ﻧﻤــﺮﻩ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻲ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﻨﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺷﺮﻁﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻳﺎﺑﻲ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺭﺍﺿﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴــﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ...
ﻓﺎﺭﻍﺍﺯﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﺑﺮﺧﻲﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙﺩﻳﮕﺮﻫﻢﭘﻴﺶﺁﻣﺪﻛﻪﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺜﺎﻝﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲﺩﺭﺑﺪﻭﻭﺭﻭﺩﺑﻪﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥﻣﺎﻟﻲﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍﻋﻮﺽﻛﺮﺩ.ﺍﻳﻦﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﺯﺁﻧﺠﺎﺣﺎﺋﺰﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢﻋﻠﻲﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻣﺎﻟﻲﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ؛
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ
ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﺣﺘــﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺑــﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺩﺭﺯ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺗﺪﺍﻋﻲﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ
ﻣﺎﻟﻲﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﺩﺳﺖﺑﻪﭼﻪﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻱﺯﺩ.ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎﻭﻗﺘﻲﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺟﻌﻠﻲ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻱ ﺁﻛﺴــﻔﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﺪ
ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻨﻪﺍﺵ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﺠﻮﻻﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ
ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻎ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺞ ﻫﻨﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮﻧﺞﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺣﺎﺝ ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ﻓﺘﻮﺣﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺩﺳﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻃﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴــﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺭﻓﺘــﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻜﺮﺭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺬﻣﻮﻡ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺝ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ
ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﺬﻣﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﺯﻭﺟﺎﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻧﻮﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺑــﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣــﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻘﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻮﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻲﭘﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﻪﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ
ﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺑﻲﻣﺤﺎﺑﺎ ﻭ ﺟﺴﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﻧﻮﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻧﻤﺎﻱ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﺮﺍﺯﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﺍﺯ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﭘﺨﺶ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻧﻤﻲﺗﺎﺑﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻋﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺗﺸﻨﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻱ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺸﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻴﻌﺖ
ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻗﺎﺋﻢﻣﻘﺎﻣﻲ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ
ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﮋﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺎﻡﺟﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺪﻋﺎﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﻤﺴﻮﺳﺖ.
19
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ،ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻴﺎﻥ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ
ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﻲﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺸﺨﺺﺷﻮﺩﺭﺳﺎﻟﺖﻭﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑﺍﻳﻦﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥﺩﺍﺷﺖﺍﻳﻦﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥﺍﻳﻦﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻮ ،ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢ ،ﻫﻤﺪﻟﻲ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ
ﺧﻮﺏ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜــﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﭘﺰﺷــﻜﻲ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﻫﺮ ﮔﺎﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺳﺎﺯ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻋﻜﺴــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺳــﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ،ﺁﻣﺒﻮﻻﻧﺲﻫﺎ،
ﺍﻭﺭژﺍﻧﺲﻫﺎﻭﺭﺯﻳﺪﻧﺖﻫﺎﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻭﺍﺭﺩﻣﻲﺷﺪﻭﻟﻲﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﺟﻮﺳﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ،ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ.ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲﻛﻪﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲﺑﺮﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻧﻴﺴﺖﻳﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱﺷﺎﻳﻌﻪﺷﻜﻞﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺭﺍﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ»ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ«ﭘﺨﺶﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﺮﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻔﻊ ﻭ ﺻﻼﺡ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻧﺎﺣــﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻎ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨــﺪ ﻻﺍﻗﻞ ﻧﺎﺣﻖ ﻳﺎ ﻏﻴﺮﻭﺍﻗــﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺗﻠﻘﻴﻦ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ »ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺎﺣﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ
20
ﻃﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﺩﺳﺘﮕﻲ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺮﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻲﻃﺮﻓﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻃﺎﻋﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺟﻪ
ﻗﺎﺑــﻞ ﻗﺒــﻮﻝ ﻧﺒــﻮﺩ .ﺑــﺎ ﺣــﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺧــﻮﺭﺩ
ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺸﺪ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ »ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷــﮕﺮ« ﻭ »ﻏﻴﺮﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷــﮕﺮ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ
ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷﮕﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻖ ﺁﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷﮕﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻇﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺤﺎﻑ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻭ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ
ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷﮕﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﻏﻴﺮﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻴﺖ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺣﻘﺎﻳﻖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ »ﺩﺭﻭﻍﻫﺎ« ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺎﺭﺳــﻲ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻍ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﭘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ
ﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺪﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ.ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻍ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﺗﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺭﺑﻂ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﺧﺒــﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﻜﺎﻫﺪ.
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻫﻴــﭻ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ »ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ« ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ
ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺷﻤﻨﺎﻥ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﺷــﻤﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ
ﻣﭻﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ .ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻲﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﻲ 40ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ
ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻫﻢ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺗﺮﺱ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ؟
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﻣﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﺩﺭﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪﻛﻞ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻍﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﻛﻮﺍﻛﺒﻴﺎﻥ:
ﻧﻤﺮﻩﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﺩﺭﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ15ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣـﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳـﺖ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺯﻳـﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ،
ﺍﻣـﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳـﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫـﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﮔﺬﺷـﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕـﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣـﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷـﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮﻱ ﺯﻳﺮ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﻛﻮﺍﻛﺒﻴـﺎﻥ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑـﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜـﺮﺩ ﺻـﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻧﺨﺴـﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻜﻲ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻘﺸـﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺷــﺮﺡ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ
ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ،ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ
ﻛﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺸــﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﺁﻳﺪ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﻌﻠﻞ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎﺩﺍﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺖ
ﻳﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻧﻘﺶ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ؟
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 68ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺳــﻪ ﻗﻮﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 68ﻓﻘﻂ ﻧﻘﺶ
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 68ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ،ﺑﺮﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻛﻤﺮﻧﮓ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﺮﺡ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺻﺤﺒﺘﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝﻫﺎ ،ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ )ﺭﻩ( ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺳﺨﻴﻒ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﻢ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺎﺧﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ
ﻛﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻫــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﻥﻣــﺮﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻫــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ
ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ
ﺳﻄﺢ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻨﺸﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻓﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻤﻨﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﻭﻳﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻞ »ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﻪﺳﺎﻻﺭﻱ«
ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻻﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ،ﻓﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﺩﺭﭼﻪ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ
ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺷــﻜﺎﻻﺗﻲ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻢ
ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻳﻜﺴﻮﻳﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﻳﻜﺴﻮﻳﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻥ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷـﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻭ ﮔﺴـﺘﺮﺵ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻘﺸﻲ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻱ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﻳﺪ .ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻥ
ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷــﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺰﺩﻭﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻲﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﻭ
ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺜﻪ ﻫﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺭﻳﺸـﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧـﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭼـﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ؟
ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺑﻬﺸــﺘﻲ ﺑــﺎ ﭼﺮﻳﻚﻫــﺎﻱ ﻓﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺜــﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻤﻦﺻﺤﺮﺍ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﺴــﻠﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻛﻴﺎﻧــﻮﺭﻱ ،ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗــﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺴــﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺻﻞ
ﻣﻨﺎﻇــﺮﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﺎﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﻭﺍﺝ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻌﺪﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﭼﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻠـﻲ ﻣﺎﻧـﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﺍﺧﺘﻴـﺎﺭ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘـﻦ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ،ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻲﻃﺮﻓﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ .ﺷﻜﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺩﺍﺭﺍﺑﻲ ،ﻗﺎﺋﻢﻣﻘﺎﻡ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺭﺍ ﭼﻨﺪﻳــﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﺠﺒﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺭﺯﺷــﻲ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﺨﺖ
ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻟــﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺜﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺏ ﻫﻢ ﺗــﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺳﺨﺖﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻧﻤﺮﻩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﺮﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ 15ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﺮﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺯﻳﺮ 10ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻃﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﺍﺩﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻭﺑــﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛــﺮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭﻳــﻎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻳﻚﺑــﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻫــﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﭼـﻪ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺭﻫﺒــﺮﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﺍﻱ
ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 200ﺣﺰﺏ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺩﺍﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻡ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ
ﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻀﺎﺭﺏ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ،ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ
ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻡ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
21
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ
ﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ 5ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻭﻡ؛
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ »ﺑﺎﺯ« ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺍﻥ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﺑﻪﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻳﺎﺳـﺖ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻧﺴﺒﺖﺑﻪﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ،ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻭﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻧﻮﻉﻭﻋﻤﻖﺍﺛﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﺑﺮﻻﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲﺩﺭﻗﻴﺎﺱﺑﺎﺳﺎﻳﺮ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮﻱﻭﺟﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﺩ.ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺩﻟﻴﻞﻧﻘﺶ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺳـﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﺷﺪﻩﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖﺩﺍﺭﻡ،ﻭﻟﻲﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪﺑﻪﺷﻴﻄﻨﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺭﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻀﺎﺭﺏ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺩﻫﻢﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖﻛﺎﺭﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ
ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡﺩﺭﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻧﻴﺎﺯﺑﻪﺑﺎﺯﺑﻴﻨﻲﺟﺪﻱﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﺘﺎﺩﻱ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ
ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﻭﺩﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﺟﻠﺐ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻳـﺎ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸـﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑـﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗـﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ
ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑـﻞ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﻄﺢ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ،ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻣﺘﺪﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻨﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ،ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﻣﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ
ﺩﺭﻙ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﭼﻪ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡﺁﻗﺎﻱﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲﺍﻳﻦﻓﺮﺻﺖﺭﺍﺩﺭﭘﻨﺞﺳﺎﻝﺩﻭﻡﭘﻴﺪﺍﻛﻨﺪﻛﻪ
ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮﻱﺭﺍﺑﻪﻗﺼﺪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺗﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺑﻪﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪﻫﻤﺪﻟﻲﻭﻣﻮﺩﺕﺭﺍﺑﻴﻦﻣﺮﺩﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ،ﺩﺭﺟﻬﺖﺗﻌﻤﻴﻖ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﺖ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎ ﺩﻫﺪ،
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻤﻪﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﺍﻧﺸﺎءﺍﷲﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻣﺮﺩﻡﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱﺭﺍﺟﻠﺐﻛﻨﺪ.
22
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮﺯﺍﺩﻩ:
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺭﻭﻣﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ 5ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭﻱ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ
ﺩﻭﺭ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ» :ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﺎﻳﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻗﻮﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ» :ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻗﻮﺕ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﻲ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻛﻴﻔﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﺑﻪﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻭ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﺜﻼ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ،
ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ،ﭼﻪ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ» :ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻛﻤﻲ ﻭﻛﻴﻔﻲ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﻫﺪ «.ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻗــﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ
ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﻭﻳــﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ
ﺷــﺪ «.ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ»:ﺗﻼﺵ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﻨــﺪ «.ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﭘﻮﺷــﺶ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ» :ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺸﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻩ
ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﺴﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻠﻲ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺣﺬﻓﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻓﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺩﻫﻢ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﻏﻴﺮﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺭﺍ ﺳﺨﺖﺗﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻣﺪﺩ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ «.ﻭﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻃﻠﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻋﺎﺩﻱﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ
ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺳﺨﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻠﺘﻬﺐ ،ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺴﺎﺱﺗﺮ ﻭ
ﺗﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺰﻡ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺩ «.ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻧﻤﺮﻩ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ» :ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﻛﻠﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺟﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺗﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻤﻠﻮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺷﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭ ﺑﺠﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ « .ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﻨﺞﺳــﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺪﺩ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﻗﻮﻣﻴﺖ ،ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠــﻒ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨــﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﭼﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﺑﻪﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺣﺮﻑ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ 20:30ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻛــﻢ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ«.
ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻭﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑـﺎﺕ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺧـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴـﺲ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺻـﺪﻭﺭ ﺣﻜﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷـﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣـﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳـﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴـﺖ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ
ﻓﻘـﻂ ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﻔـﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺟﺴـﺘﻪ ﻛـﺮﺩ ،ﭼﻪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻧﻮﺵﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ،
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣـﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﺭﺍﻣﻴـﻦ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ،ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﺱ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﺸـﺪ .ﺑﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻧﻮﺵﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ،ﻣﺸـﺎﻭﺭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟـﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
***
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﺴﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳـﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒــﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ
ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺰﺑﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻱ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ،
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ
ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ؟ ﻧﻤﺮﻩ ﻫﻢﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣـﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴـﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﺪ؟
ﺑــﻪ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻲ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ
ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻖ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻳﻌﻨـﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺿﻌـﻒ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭ
ﻧﺨﺴـﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ
ﺟﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻣــﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻓﻜــﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨــﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻋﻜــﺲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ.
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺧـﺎﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ؟
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟــﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﻣﻄﻠﻌﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﭘﻲﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﺷــﻨﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﻧﺸﻴﻨﺎﻥ
ﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻧﻘﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎﻱ
ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺜﻼ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺍﺑﻌــﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ ﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺫﻱﻧﻔﻊ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺁﻧﻔﻠﻮﺁﻧﺰﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﻧﻔﻠﻮﺁﻧﺰﺍﻱ ﻧﻮﻉ ،Aﺧﻮﻛﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﻤــﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻴﺸــﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻧﻔﻠﻮﺁﻧﺰﺍ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺯ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗــﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻧﺸــﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻭﺍﻳــﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ
ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺷﻤﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.ﺍﻣﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺸﻮﻳﻖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳـﺎﻟﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ .ﻭﻱ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻛﻴﻔﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻄﻮﺡ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓﺗﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ.
23
ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺳﻴﺪﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ *
ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﻘﺎﻯ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ
ﻧﺴﺒﻰ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸــﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺷﺨﺼﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﺭﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻰﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ
ﺭﺻﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﻭﻳﺲ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻃﻼﻕ »ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ« ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ
ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻳﻚ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻃﻼﻕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻯ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﮔﺎﻡ
ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺌﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺭﻧﮓ ﺑﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎﻯ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻓﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﭘﺨﺶ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺧﻼء ﺟﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻰ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻗﻮﻩﺍﻯ ﻭ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ،
ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﻘﻨﻨﻪ ،ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﻧﻈﺎﻡ،
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ،ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﺟﻨﺎﺣﻰ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻭ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ.
24
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺜﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺰﺑﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ
ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻣﺮﺟﻌﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ
ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻧﻴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺭﻭﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﺳــﺖ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤــﺪﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﻣﻠﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ
ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺫﻫﺎﻥ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺟﺎ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ »ﻣﻠﻰ« ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨــﺪ؛ ﺻﺮﻓﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩ ﻳﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ .ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻧﺰﻧﻨﺪ .ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻛﺴﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻛﺴــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻝ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷــﻮﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ،ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺳﺨﻨﮕﻮﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺣــﺰﺍﺏ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺁﻗــﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻴــﻢ .ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻛﻠﻲ ،ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺍﻥ
ﻛﻞ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﭘﺎ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻲ
ﺁﻥ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻫــﻢ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﻮﻡ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺍﻥ
ﻛﻞ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻭﻃﻠﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻃﻲ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺁﻥ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺿﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻠﺴﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﺸﺪ.
ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ 20:30ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺖﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻮژﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻮﺍﻻﺗﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ
ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺩﻫﻢ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﺮﻧﮓ ﺷﺪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ 20:30ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶﻫــﺎﻱ 20:30ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻳﻜﺴــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ،
ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﺯ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﺴــﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؛ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﺱ
ﺑﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻄﺮﻓﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺭﻫﺒــﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻴــﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ .ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ،ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ،ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻁ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ)ﺱ( ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ:
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ
»ﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ« ،ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻞﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺴـﻴﺮﻱ
ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺩﻳـﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ .ﭘﻮﺷـﺶ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﻃﺮﻑ
ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻐﺮﺿﺎﻧﻪ ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺷـﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻟﻘﺐ ﺑﮕﻴـﺮﺩ؛ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻟﻌﺎﺑﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﻌﺎﺏ
ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﭘﺸﺖ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺑﻴـﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ )ﺱ( ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑـﺎ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻭﻱ ،ﻋﻤﻠﻜـﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑـﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺑﻪﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻧﭙﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺘﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯﻱ ،ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ
)ﺱ( ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ.
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻃﻲ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸـﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘـﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ
ﻣﻲﺗﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﻰ ،ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻳﻚﺳﻮﻳﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻰ ﺁﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻪﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻳﻚﺳـﻮﻳﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﮔﻤﺎﻥ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺷﺪ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ.
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘـﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ
ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨـﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺯﻳﻨﺐ)ﺱ( ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﻭﺳــﻴﻊ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻢ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻤــﻪ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻳــﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴــﻢ ﺑﻪﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺩﻳــﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳــﻮ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﻮﺷــﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺑﻨﺎ
ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄـﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﻴﻨﻲ ﻫـﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻓـﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜــﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻩ
ﻳﺎ ﭘﺎﻧــﺰﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ،ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ،ﺧﺒﺮ ﻳــﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻢ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻢ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻳﺪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻼﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺷــﻨﻮﻡ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻛﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺣﻘﺎﻕ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ
ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻳﺎ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺁﻳـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ؟
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺧﻴﺮ .ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ.
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺷـﺪﻥ
ﻓﻀﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﻫﺪ؟
ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻤــﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺲ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ
ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺍ
ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ ،ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ
ﻫﻢ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﺣﻖ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻰﺷــﻨﻮﻡ ،ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻜﺴﻮﻳﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻣﻦ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﻊ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻓــﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻘﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ .ﮔﺮﭼــﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﻤﻜــﻦ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺭﺍﻯﺁﻭﺭﻯ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺑﮕــﺬﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺷــﻜﺎﻟﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ
ﻛﺮﺳﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭﻳﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻴﻢ.
ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬـﺖ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ
ﺗﻔﺮﻗﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻨﺶ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺩﻫﺪ؟
ﭘﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻗﺮﺹ ﻭ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ،
ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺻﺪﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺻﺪﻣﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﺨﻮﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻡ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐــﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ،ﺁﻥ
ﺿﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﻫﺴـﺘﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻜﺴـﻮﻳﻪ
ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺍﺣﻘﺎﻕ ﺣﻖ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺗــﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻴــﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ
ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
25
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﮔﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻧﻪﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﻌﺎﺕ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳـﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴـﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺋﻤﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳـﻨﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺎﺱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻠﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﻛﻨـﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﻭﻥﺭﻓﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ.
26
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑـﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳـﻚ ﻣﺨﺎﻃـﺐ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺋﻤﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴــﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧــﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﻗــﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻠﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻋــﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺻﺮﻑ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ
ﺍﻓــﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ
ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲﺷﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺐ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻏﻀﺐ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺿﺎﻳﻊ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻳﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺑﺴﺎﻣﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺰ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺠﻴﺪ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ .ﺟﺴــﺎﺭﺕ
ﻭ ﺑﻲﻣﻬﺮﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺿﻌﻒ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ 12ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻼﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻲ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻓﺖ ﻛﻴﻔﻲ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻝ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻳﺘﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﺪ؟
ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ
ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺴــﺎﺩ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﭘﻮﺷــﺶ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻧﺤﻮﻯ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﺳــﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻏﻀﺐ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺩﻡ
ﺗﺎﺳﻒ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ
ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻙﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺘﮕﺰﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻲﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳـﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺤـﺺ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ
ﺷﺸﻢ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺷـﺒﻬﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺤﺺ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺸﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻳﺨﺖﻭﭘﺎﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﻔﺎﺳﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺤﺺ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﻫﺎ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﺎﻳﻖ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺤﺺ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﭼﺸﻢﭘﻮﺷﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻃﻔﺮﻩ
ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﺩﻩ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺧﺎﺹ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﮕﻔﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻴﺐ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺷﻔﺎﻑﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺟﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺷــﻔﺎﻑ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﻘﺎﻳﻖ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖﻭﺗﻔﺤﺺ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷــﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺳﻮﺩ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﭘﺮﺣﺮﺍﺭﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻭﺍﭘﺴﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪ.ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ
ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻘﺎﻳﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻲﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺼﻴﺮﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ،ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺑﻲﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺘﺮ ﺳﺮﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺳﺮﻩ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻮﻳﻪ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻗﻮﺍ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻮﻳﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺿﺎﻳﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺳﻮءﻧﻴﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻧﻴﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﻢ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ
ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻯﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰﺳﺎﻳﺮﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﺣﺎﺋﺰﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘﻲ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﺮﺯﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ
ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴــﻲﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﭘﺬﻳﺮ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻫﻨﮕﻔﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻲ ،ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻲ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻔﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻔﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ 35ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ
ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻲﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ،ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻨﻲ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻋﺎﺩﻻﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ ،ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﺎﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ،ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻇﺎﻟﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ.
ﺑﻲﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﻴﺖﺍﻟﻤﺎﻝ ﺩﺯﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺯﻳﺮﭘﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻇﻠﻢ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﻰﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻰ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻰﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻰﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳـﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻌﻠـﻲ ،ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻨﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻣــﺪ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﻡ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ .ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻜﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻋﺘﺎﺏ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﺪﻱ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﺮﺍﺳــﺮ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﺳﺖ.
ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻧﺘﺎﺑﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﻭﻥﺭﻓﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ،
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﭘﺴــﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻫــﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻓــﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﺮﺳــﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳــﺎﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻫﻞ
ﻋﺪﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ،ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺭﺷــﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺰﺏ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺟﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪﻫﺎ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻔﻮﺭ
ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣــﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﻥﺭﻓﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﺑﻪﻋــﻼﻭﻩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ
ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﺒــﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﭼﻪ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳـﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﺭ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﮔﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣــﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻓﺘــﻦ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ،ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﻫﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺭﻭﺩ،
ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺪﻫﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺭ ﻭ ﻭﺑﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮگ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
27
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻛﻮﺷﻜﻰ
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﺼﻴﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺳﻰ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﺴــﺠﻢ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎﺳﺖ .ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻳﻚ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﻠﻮﻙ ﺍﻟﻄﻮﺍﻳﻔﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﺷــﺨﺼﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺭﻧﺞ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭ ﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻰ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﺟﻨﺎﺣﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻳﻚ
ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳﺎﺯﺍﻥ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺁﺳﻴﺒﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺷﻔﺎﻑﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑﺮ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩ ،ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﺪﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻳﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭ ﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ
ﻫﻤﺬﺍﺕﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻖ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
28
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﺷــﻔﺘﮕﻰ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﺷــﻔﺘﮕﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻟﺒﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﺑﻪﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ 30ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻰﭼﻮﻥ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺧﺎﺹ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻂﻣﺸﻰ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺟﻬﺖﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﺷــﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯ ﻣﺪﻭﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻖﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺣﻴﺮﺕ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻳﻰ
ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﺷــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻰ ،ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ» :ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺑﻪﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻋﻠــﻢ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ
ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻄﺤﻰ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﺳــﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭ
ﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻳﻰ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻃﻴﻒﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻣﺠﺎﻝ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝﻧﻈــﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻓــﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﻣﻬﺠﻮﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻳﻰ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ .ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
75ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﺝ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺤﺮ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺮﺯﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻃﻴﻒﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻰﻧﻴــﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒــﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧــﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻳﻰ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺑﻪﺩﻻﻳﻞ
ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻣﺒﺮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺭﻳﺰﺵ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ .ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻧﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ
ﻓﻜﺮﻯﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧــﻪ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺷــﺨﺼﺎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﺷــﻔﺘﮕﻰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳــﺎﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻤﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻧﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻧﺞ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺒﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺪﺍﻧﺴﺘﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻭ
ﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳــﺎﺯﺍﻥ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻰ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ 75ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺘﺺ
ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻡ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻩ ﺷﻔﻴﻌﻰ
ﺍﻋﻈﻢﺍﻟﺴــﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻡ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﻓﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻃﻰ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﺰ ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺟﺰﺋﻰ ،ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﻯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻔﺎﻯ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﺎﻯﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺳــﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﺘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺍﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ.
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻏﺎﻓﻞ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ
ﺭﻭﺳــﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺳــﺎﻝ 87ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺮﻧﮓ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻫﺮﺍ ﺭﻫﻨﻮﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻪ ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﻓﺮﺍﺣﻰ
ﺩﻭﺷﺎﺩﻭﺵ ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺍﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻔﺎﻯ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﻓﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﺎﻯﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﺑﻪﮔﻮﺍﻩ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻫﻴﭻﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺳــﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻘﺸﻰ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺳﺮ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎ
ﺩﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺷــﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﻳﻚ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺯﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻋﺎﺗﻘﻪ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﺑﻨﻰﺻﺪﺭ ،ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻦ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﻯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺎﻧﻮﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 49
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺷﺎﺩﻭﺵ ﺷﻬﻴﺪﺭﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﭼﻬــﺮﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ
ﺑﻪﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﺍﻭﺝ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﺮﻳﻢ
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯﻯ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ» ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺟﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﻭﻱ،
ﻋﺎﺗﻘــﻪ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍﻩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ «.ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺳﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺷﮕﻔﺘﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ،ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺩ ﺷــﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺩ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺗﻨﺪ
ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺧﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺭﺟﺎﻳﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻫﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﺎﻟﺲ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺷﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰﻧﻘﺶﺯﻫﺮﺍﺭﻫﻨﻮﺭﺩ،ﻫﻤﺴﺮﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ،ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ
ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ .ﺯﻫﺮﺍ ﺭﻫﻨﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻜﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻼﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﻯ
ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 57ﺗﺎ ،59ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ
ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻰﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺭﻫﻨﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 75ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﺎ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ 76ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺍﻟﺰﻫﺮﺍ)ﺱ( ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﺷﺪ ،ﺳﻤﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ 85ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ،ﺭﻫﻨﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺍﻟﺰﻫﺮﺍ)ﺱ( ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ
ﺍﻭﺝ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﻫﻨﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺠﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺗﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﻫﺮﺍ)ﺱ( ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﻓﺖ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻯ ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ،ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻫــﻪ 60ﻋﻠﻰﺍﻛﺒــﺮ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪ .ﻫﻤﺴــﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻋﻔﺖ ﻣﺮﻋﺸﻰ ،ﻧﻮﻩ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲﺍﻟﻌﻈﻤــﻰ ﺳــﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻛﺎﻇــﻢ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﺋﻰ ﻳﺰﺩﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺗﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒــﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﻭ ﺻﺒﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻤﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺮﻭﺭ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ،1358ﺗﻼﺵ ﻋﻔﺖ
ﻣﺮﻋﺸﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮءﻗﺼﺪ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ 68ﺗﺎ 76ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺠﺎﻫﺪﺕ ﻋﻔﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫــﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻭ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ
ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺯﻳﺎﺭﺗﻰ ،ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﻘﻞ
ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻔﺖ ﻣﺮﻋﺸﻰ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓــﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺯﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﺍﺵ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﺳــﺎﻝ 88ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻏﻮﻏﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪﭘﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺲ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺭﺍﻯ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﻪﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺗﻘﻠﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻔﺖ
ﻣﺮﻋﺸﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﻴﺮﻳﻪ ﻣﺸــﺎﺭﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﺎﺗﺶ ،ﺍﺯ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﻔﺖ ﻣﺮﻋﺸــﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻛﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ،
ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻫﻤﺴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﻮﺳﻰﺻﺪﺭ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ 8ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻮﺑﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ 76ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺭﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻓﺖ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﻰ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺳــﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺝ
ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻍ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ،ﺯﻫﺮﻩ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻰ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﻮﺳﻰﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ
ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻰ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﻛﻢﻭﺑﻴﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤــﺮﺍﻩ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺗــﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺴــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺑﻪﺁﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺩﺍﻧﺶﺁﻣﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﺑﻰﺑﻀﺎﻋﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﻴﺮﻳﻪ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺶﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﻯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺤﺴــﻮﺏ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ؛ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻣﻴﺸــﻞ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 82ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻳﺶ
ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻗﻴﺎﻧﻮﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡﺁﺑﺎﺩ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪﺩﻋــﻮﺕ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﻛﺮﺯﺍﻯ
ﺑﻪﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 87ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺗﺒﺮﻳﻚ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻗﻄﺮ،
ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺷﻴﺨﻪ ﻣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﻨﺖ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻟﻤﺴﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻫﺮﻩ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻰ ،ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ
ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺗﺒﺮﻳﻚ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﻏﺰﻩ ﺑﻪﻟﺰﻭﻡ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻠﺴﻄﻴﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺯﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ،ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﻧــﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺯﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻢﻭﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺳﻔﺮ
ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻡ ،ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﻄﻖ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺘﺎﻯ ﻣﺼﺮﻯﺍﺵ
ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺼﻴﺤﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﺴــﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺳــﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﻴﺮﻳﻪ
ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺑــﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧــﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻯ
ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻧﻘﺶﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣــﻰ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﻮﺩ.
29
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻧﻚ
ﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺁﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ
ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺮﻑ
ﻭ ﺣﺪﻳﺚﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺳﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﭘﺎﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺭﺍﻯ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤــﺎﺩ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺻﺮﻳــﺢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜــﺮﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﻄﺮﻭﺣﻪ
ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭﺵ ﺁﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻘﻢ
ﺁﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﭼﻴﻨﺶ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺯﻥ؛ ﺗﺎﺑﻮﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ
ﺳﻨﺖﺷــﻜﻨﻰ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺳــﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ
ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻯ ﺯﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻭﺣﻴﺪﺩﺳﺘﺠﺮﺩﻯ ،ﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ ﻭ
ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺣﻴﺪﺩﺳﺘﺠﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻗﻢ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻪ ﺁﻟﻴﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺒﺢ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺯﻣﺰﻣﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ،ﺣﺎﺝﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻰ
ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﺠﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ،ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻗﻮﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﺤﺖ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻭﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺮﺟﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺑﻪﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻧﺎﻣﺠﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻳﻜﺸــﻨﺒﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺳﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻯ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ 149ﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ95 ،ﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻭ 21ﺭﺍﻯ
ﻣﻤﺘﻨﻊ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺭﺍﻯ ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺣﺎﺝﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻰ
ﺑﺎ 217ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ 33 ،ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ 13 ،ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻤﺘﻨﻊ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﻣﺠﻮ
ﺑﺎ 210ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ 36 ،ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻭ 19ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻤﺘﻨﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺣﺎﺝﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﻣﺠﻮ ﻛﻪ
30
ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﭘﺎﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ.
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ؛ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺳﺨﺖ
ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﻳﺎﺭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ،ﭘﺎﻛﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ «.ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻯ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻫﻲ ﺗﻘﻠﺐ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﻣﺎ
ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺷﻜﻮﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴــﻢ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻼﻣﺖ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ «.ﻭﻯ ﺍﻓــﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻘﺎﻁ
ﺿﻌﻒ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻣﻔﺮﻭﺽ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻘﺎﻁ
ﻗﻮﺕ ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻳﺎﻧﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻋﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻫﻨﮕﻔﺖ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﻗﺖ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻲ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﭘﺎﺳﺦﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻊﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺴﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﻪﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺳﻮءﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ» :ﭼﻮﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ
ﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺟﺸــﻦ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻓﻼﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺪﺍﻗــﻞ 80ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺁﺭﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻮءﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺳﻮءﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ «.ﻭﻯ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻋﻈﻢ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺁﺷــﻮﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻱ ﺗﻘﻠﺐ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻱ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺛﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﻛﻮﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻝ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ
ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻊ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮﻧﻲ ﺳــﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺩﺭﺩﻧﺎﻙ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻗﺎﻧﻊﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺳﻬﻞﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮءﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺍﻝ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ«.
ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺎﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺿﻮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺻﺤﻦ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺮﻙ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ.
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰﻋﻼﻭﻩﺑﺮﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥﺩﺭﺻﻒﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥﻭﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺳﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻃــﺮﺡ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗﻮﺭﻯ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰﭘﺸﺖﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥﻣﺠﻠﺲﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺑﻮﺩﺑﺎﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﺍﻳﻦﻣﻄﻠﺐﻛﻪ
ﻭﺣﻲ ﻣﻨﺰﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﻔﺖ ،ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ
ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ﻧﻔﺖ،ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﺭﻓﺎﻩﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ؟
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥﺩﺭﺳﻤﺖﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺭﻓﺎﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﺍﻳﻦﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ
ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ،ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ «.ﺑﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻭﻱ ،ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ
ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ؛ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺩﺭﺣﻮﺯﻩﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﺳﻨﺎﻳﻲﺑﺎﺑﻴﺎﻥﺍﻳﻦﻣﻄﻠﺐﻛﻪﺗﻌﺠﺐ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﺪ ﭘﺲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﭘﺲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺳﺐ ﺣﺒﻴﺐﺍﷲ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﺎ
ﻛﺴﺐ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻧﺸﺎءﺍﷲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻛﻨﺪ «.ﻭﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ،ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩﻃﺒﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻧﻴﺴﺖ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲﺣﻮﺯﻩﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﺩﺭﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﻭﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺛﺮﻭﺗﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ
ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺭﺍﻧﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻧﺎﺳﺎﻟﻢ
ﻣﺎ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ «.ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ» :ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ 40ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺷﻜﻮﻫﻤﻨﺪ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻱﺑﺴﺎ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖﺟﻠﻮﻱﺑﺮﺧﻲﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙﻭﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻫﺎﺭﺍﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺳﺮﻗﻔﻠﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺷﻐﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﺴــﻨﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻞﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺾ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺮﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ«.
ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ﺍﺳــﺪﻯ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﻧﺎﻃﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗﻮﺭﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻜﻞ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺳﻮﺁپ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻢ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨــﻮﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺰﻳﺮﺍﺕ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺩﺑﻴﻞ ﻣﻔﺘﻮﺡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻯ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺑﻴﺦ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻗــﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺗﻨﮕﺎﺗﻨﮓ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻫﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﻭﻯ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﺷﺪ» :ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻡ ،ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﭼﻨﺪﺑﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺷﻨﻮﻯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﺟﺪﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ
ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺧﻂ ﻓﻘــﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ«.
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻄﻖ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻳﻮﻧﺲ ﺍﺳــﺪﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﻃﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺩﺑﻴﻞ ﻳــﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳــﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺫﺍﻛﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺭﺩﺑﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺪﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺳﻮﺋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ
ﺯﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺭﺩﺑﻴﻞ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻢ
ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺑﻄﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ! ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 77ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻫﺎﻧﺘﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ
ﺩﻫﻴﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻴﻜﺮﻭﻓﻦ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺭﺩﺑﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
ﺣﻤﻼﺕ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔــﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻧﺸــﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﻧﻄــﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻯ ،ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻨﺪ 11ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 23ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻄﻖ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺳــﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬــﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ» :ﻣﻦ
ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢﺑﺎﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖﻫﺴﺘﻢﻳﺎﻧﻪ،ﺍﻣﺎﺳﻨﺎﻳﻲﻭﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ
ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻫﻨﮕﻔﺖ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺯﺩﻧﺪﻛﻪ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ «.ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ
ﺩﺭﭘﺎﺳﺦﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﺗﺬﻛﺮﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩﮔﻔﺖ»:ﺍﻳﻦﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﺗﺬﻛﺮﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻭﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕﺑﺎﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥﺍﺳﺖ«.ﺍﻣﺎﺍﻳﻦﺻﺤﺒﺖﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲﺑﺎﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ
ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪﺷﺪﻭ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲﺩﺭﭘﺎﺳﺦﺑﻪﻭﻱ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ»:ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻤﺎﺑﻪﺿﺮﺭﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥﺍﺳﺖﻭﺑﺎﺍﻳﻦﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﺗﻨﻬﺎﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥﺭﺍﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ«.ﺩﺭﻫﻤﻴﻦﻟﺤﻈﻪﻣﻬﺪﻱﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩﺍﺯﺟﺎﻱﺧﻮﺩﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ ﺯﺩﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻱ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﺷﺪ:
»ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱﺷﻤﺎﻗﺎﺑﻞﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥﻧﻴﺴﺖ«.ﺩﺭﻫﻤﻴﻦﻟﺤﻈﻪﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ ﺯﺩ ،ﭘﺲ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳــﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞﺟﻨﺎﺣﻲﺑﻪﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ،ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ
ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻛﻪ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺭﺑﻂ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﻧﻴﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ«.
ﺑﺎﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﮕﻰ ﻭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﺪﻯ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓــﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺒﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﻪﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﮔــﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ:
»ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻓﺼﻞﺍﻟﺨﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎﻣﻨﺎﺩﻯ،ﻳﻜﻰﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﺯﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥﺻﺎﺩﻕﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰﺑﺮﺍﻯﺗﺼﺪﻯ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺭﻓﺎﻩﻭﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰﺑﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﺎﻃﻘﺎﻥﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻗﻮﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻼﻣﺖﻧﻔﺲ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻗﺎﻃﻌﺎﻧﻪ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻛﺮﺩﻭﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ»:ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰﺍﻳﻦﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪﻣﻬﻢﺭﺍﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖﻣﺎﻳﻚﭘﻮﺳﺖﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪﻭﺩﺭﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪﻳﻚ
ﺍﻣﺘﺤﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ؛ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰ
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﻮﻯﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻓﺮﺩﻯﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ «.ﻣﻨﺎﺩﻯ
ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻻﺯﻡﺍﺳﺖ.ﺑﻪﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻰﺍﺯﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖﺑﺎﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ،ﺧﺪﺍﺷﺎﻫﺪﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺍﺳﺘﺨﺎﺭﻩﻛﺮﺩﻡﻭﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺧﻮﺏﺁﻣﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ«.
ﻋﻠﻰﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﺯﺍﺭﻋﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ،ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﺪ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﻭ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺷﺮﻋﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺟﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻛﺴﻰ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﺪ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺷﺮﻋﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؛ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ
ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳــﻰ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ
ﭘﺎﻳﻴــﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒــﺎﻁ ﺗﻨﮕﺎﺗﻨﮓ
ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻻﺯﻣﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪﻯ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ«.
ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺟﻮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺷــﺪ.
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ ﺷﺎﻡ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﺠﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔــﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮءﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ،ﺛﺮﻭﺕﻫﻨﮕﻔﺖﺍﻭ،ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦﺗﺨﺼﺺﻭﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻄﻖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻣﺠﻴﺪ
ﻧﺎﻣﺠﻮ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﺪﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﺧﻮﺏ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﻰ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﻭﻯ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﻧﺎﻣﺠﻮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻓﺘﺎﺡ
ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺧﺎﺗﻢ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﻴﺎ ،ﺛﺎﺭﺍﷲ ﻭ ﻛﺮﺑﻼ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﻛﺎﺭﻯﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﺩ،ﺩﺭﺩﻭﻟﺖﻧﻬﻢﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥﻭﺯﻳﺮﻧﻴﺮﻭﻭﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ
ﻭﺭﺋﻴﺲﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩﺷﺮﻛﺖﺁﺏﻭﻓﺎﺿﻼﺏﻛﺸﻮﺭﺑﻮﺩ.ﻭﺯﻳﺮﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﺪﻯ ﺳﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻰ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ
ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ،ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﺑﺎﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒﺍﺯﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻛﺮﺩﺑﻪ
ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻭﻱ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﮕﻔﺘﻲ
ﻭ ﺗﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺎﺩﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺳــﺎﻃﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢﺗﻮﺳﻂﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻲﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪﻓﺘﺎﺡﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻭﺯﻳﺮﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﭘﺲﺍﺯﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ؛ﺣﺎﺝﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻰﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺷﻰﺷﺪ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺣﺎﺝﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷﺪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻫﻤﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﺎﻟﺲ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ،ﺷﺸــﻢ ،ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻭ
ﻫﺸــﺘﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﺎﻟﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺸــﺘﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺗﻴﺰﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺣﺎﺟﻰﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﺶ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺱﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﺮﻳﺾ ﻭ ﻃﻮﻳﻞ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﺷﺪ.ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﺎﻣﺠﻮ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺗﺒﻊ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻭﻯ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ.
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺟﻠﺴــﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭ
ﺟﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﺟﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﺍﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ.
31
ﺑﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ،ﺳﻔﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ
»ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻟــﺰﻯ ﺑﻪﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﺳــﻔﻴﺮ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ
ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ «.ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻨــﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺯﺍﻫــﺪﻱ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪﺳــﻤﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲ
ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻱ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﺱ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺳﺎﺑﻖ ،ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺼﺐ ﺭﺍﺿﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺩﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﻔﻴﺮ .ﺷﺎﻳﻌﻪ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻧﻮﺫﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳــﺨﻦﻫﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺸــﻘﺎﻭﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺳﻔﺮﺍ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻨﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺳﻲ ﺳﻔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
»ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﺻﻞ 128ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﺳــﻔﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪﻭﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻔﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻔﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ «.ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺳﻔﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﻧﻬﻢ ،ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﻭ ﺳﻔﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ،ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺼﺐ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬــﻮﺭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻟﺠﻮﻳــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﺎﻥ
ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﺳﺘﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﻣﻮﺯﻧﺪ.
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻴﮕﺪﻟﻰ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻱ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ
ﺗﺎﺳﻒ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳــﺶ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﺻﺒﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
32
ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ
ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ«.
ﺯﻳﺒــﺎﻛﻼﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﮔﻔــﺖ» :ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺳــﻔﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻼﻙ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻭﺯﺭﺍ -ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺳﻔﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎﺳﺖ -ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻩ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ
ﺑﻪﻧﺤﻮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺻﻔﺎﺭ ﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﻪﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻋﺪﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺪ«.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳــﻔﻴﺮ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻰ
ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻴﮕﺪﻟﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﻣﻠﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ«.
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻛﻼﻡ ﻫــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ» :ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴــﺖ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣــﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ
ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺳﻔﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ،ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻳﺎ ژﺍﭘﻦ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻗــﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺣﺎﺩﺗﺮ ﺷــﺪ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻔﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺩﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤــﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ
ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﺮﻗﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻔﻴﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ
ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻳﺪ .ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻧﺰﻭﺋﻼ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻻﺗﻴﻦ ﻳﺎ
ﻧﻪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﺮﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ«.
ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺳﻔﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ 40ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻔﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻟﻐﻮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ،ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻔﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ »ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ« ﻭ »ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺷﻮﺑﮕﺮﺍﻥ« ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪ .ﺳﺨﻨﮕﻮﻱ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔــﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻗﺸــﻘﺎﻭﻱ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ 40ﺳــﻔﻴﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺳــﻔﺮﺍ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺘﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﺳــﻔﺮﺍ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻰﺑــﺮﺩ .«.ﻭﻯ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳــﺪ» :ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ،
ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻔﺮﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺳــﻔﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚﺷــﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﺠﺮﻯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ«.
ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑــﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺎﻧــﻪ ﺗﻜﺎﻧﻰ ﺷــﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ،ﭼﻬﻞ ﺳــﻔﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮﺍ ﻧﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻧﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﺪﻯ ﭘﺴﺖ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣــﺎﻥ ،ﺻــﺎﺩﻕ ﺧــﺮﺍﺯﻯ ،ﺷــﻤﺲﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﻗﺎﻧــﻰ ﻭ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻋﺎﺩﻟﻰ ،ﺳــﻔﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ،ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ
ﺑﻪﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ،ﺣﻜﻢ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓــﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺧﺎﺭﺟــﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻋﺎﺩﻟﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺧﺮﺍﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﻗﺎﻧﻰ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻓﺎﻋﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺮگ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺭﺍﻋﻈﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻧﺘﺎﺑﻴﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚﺷﺒﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ
ﻃﻮﻻﻧــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﻣﻴــﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧﺼﺮﺕﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻪ ،ﺗﻴﻤﻮﺭﺗﺎﺵ ﻭ
ﺩﺍﻭﺭ ،ﺳــﻪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺿﺎﺧﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻰ
ﺑﻪﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺣﻜﻮﻣــﺖ ﺍﻳﻠﺨﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ
10ﻭﺯﻳــﺮ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺎﺭﺿﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻣــﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﻪﺟﺮﻡ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻯ ﭼﻮﺑــﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﺭﻯ ،ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ
ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻰﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ،ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ...».ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺗﻨﻔﺲ ﺭﻓﺘــﻢ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﺳــﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻴﺰ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ) «...ﺍﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﮔﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ،ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ،ﺷــﻤﺎﺭﻩ (32ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻠﺦﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻠﻚ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ،ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﻴﺰ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺷﺪ؛ ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻨﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺪ
ﺭﻓﺖ .ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﭼﻴﺰ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ،ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﻣﺮگ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻢ.
»ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ )ﺍﺻﻞ 46ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻋﺰﻝ ﻭ ﻧﺼﺐ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻫﺮﻭﻗﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺰﻝ ﻭ ﻧﺼﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻰ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻴﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻼﻃﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ...ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴــﭻ ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺍﻋﻠﻴﺤﻀﺮﺕ ﺷــﺨﺼﺎ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠــﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃــﺮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻫﺖ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻭ
ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ ﻫﺮﻛﺲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﺍﻟﻠﺰﻭﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺷﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺑﺪ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﻮﺍﺧﺬﻩ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ«.
ﺑﻲﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ،ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻓﺮﺩﺍﻯ ﻣﻌﺮﻛﻪ 28ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ .ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻯ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺮﺳﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 26ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1332ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺮﺱ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺮﺩﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺴــﺘﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺴﺘﺮﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻭﻓﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﻛﻮﻝ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺮﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺻﺒﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﺍﺟــﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﺤﺘﺎﺝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﺮﺍﺳــﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ .ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴــﻦ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺗﻰ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺁﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﻭﺭ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺤﻜﻤﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ
ﺑﻪﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﺭﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﺮ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﻪﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﺮﺍﻳﻢ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻐﻠﻄﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ؛ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺑﻪﻣﻮﺟﺐ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺴﺘﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻣﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻟﺸﻜﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﺭﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﺮ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻣﺸــﻤﻮﻝ ﻫﻴﭻﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ،ﺩﺭ 4ﺷــﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ
1332ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼــﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺩﺭﺳــﻰ ﺍﺭﺗــﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻥ
ﻟﻢﻳﻜﻦ ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﺭﺳﻰ
ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻀﺤﻜﻰ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻤﻮﻝ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﺎﻑ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ
ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻳﻚ
33
ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺷﺐ 25ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ 28ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﺖ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﺰﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺑــﺎ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ 28ﻣــﺮﺩﺍﺩ 1332ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﺪ ،ﻣﮕﺮ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﭘــﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ،ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺳﺮﺳﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ،ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ
ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺖ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﮔﺮ ﻣﻮﺝ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﻀﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻰ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰ
ﭘﻰﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻴﻔﺎﻯ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻣﺼــﺪﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻃﺮﺡ
ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ 31ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﮔﻔــﺖ» :ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﻪﺯﻭﺩﻯ ﺑﻪﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﻦ ﺳﻨﺎ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮﻱﺍﺵ
ﻣﺮﺗﻜﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﺭﺕ
ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺿﺪﺣﻜﻮﻣــﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ «.ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺪﻫﻢ ،ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﻪﭘﺮﺳﻰ
ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﭼﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﺭﺳﻰ
ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺷــﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭﻣﺎﻩ
1332ﺧﻮﺭﺷــﻴﺪﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺨﻨﮕﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﻝ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺑﺎﺯﺟﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
ﻳﻚﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
20ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ .ﺳﺮﺗﻴﭗ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ
ﺑﺎﺯﺟﻮﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺟﻮﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺮﺳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ
9ﻣﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻛﻴﻔﺮﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺗﻴﭗ ﺭﻳﺎﺣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﺗﻬــﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻫﻢ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻭ
ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ،ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻪ ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺎﻗــﺪ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ؛ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ
ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻞ ) (69ﻣﺘﻤﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﻭﻡ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻞ ) (27ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﻭ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﻛﻴﻔﺮﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ) (37ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ 1318ﻣﻘﺮﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ 6ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻪﺳﻤﺖ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪﻯ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻳﺎ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺮﺳــﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺷﺸﻢ ،ﺍﻓﺴــﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻭﺍﻣﺮ
ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺣﻴــﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺎﺏ ﺑﺰﻩ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺗﺎ 28ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻰ
ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺯﻳﺮﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺯ 28ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺑﻨﺪ ) (6ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ) (37ﺳــﻤﺖ
ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﺩﻩ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺪﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ 17ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ
34
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖﻛﻪﻣﻮﺭﺩﺳﻮﺍﻝﺩﻛﺘﺮﻣﺼﺪﻕﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺑﻮﺩ،
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻔﺖ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ،ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﻰ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺲ ،ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻛﻼﻣﻰ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﺭﻓﺖ ،ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺟﻮﺍﺑﻰ ،ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺳﻨﺠﻰﻭ ﺗﺴﻠﻄﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺭﺳﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ
ﻣﻰﺯﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ،ﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻓﺎﻋﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﮓ
ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﺘﺎﻛﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﺷﻜﺴــﺘﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺭﻭﻯ
ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻔﻮ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ
ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ 35ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ،ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺪﻭﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ،ﺧﺘﻢ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ ﺳﺎﻝ 1332ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻰ ،ﺷﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ،ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻮ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻗﺐ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﺼﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ
ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗــﺎﻭﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ
ﻧﻔﺖ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻣﻠﻰ
ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻰ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺱ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻣﻠﻮﻛﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻈﻢﻟﻪ )ﺷﺎﻩ( ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺻﺮﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ «.ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺗﺨﻔﻴﻒ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺣﺒﺲ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺸﻪ
ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻣﻦ
ﻧﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻔﻮ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻭ ﻭﺟﺪﺍﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺩﻫﻴﺪ«.
ﻋﺎﻗﺒﺖ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ
ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘــﻪ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋــﻼﻡ ﺣﻜــﻢ ،ﻻﻳﺤــﻪ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ
ﺩﻛﺘــﺮ ﻣﺼــﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺷــﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺒﻨﻰﺑﺮ
ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﺭ 22ﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ
1333ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ،ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ
ﻫﻢ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ
ﺍﻧﺸﺎﻯ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻣﻴﺖ
ﺣﺒﺲ ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ
ﻣﺼــﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳــﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺮﺳــﻴﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺷــﻌﺒﻪ
9ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺣﻜــﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻝ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻــﻰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﺮﺳــﻴﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺨﺘﻮﻣﻪ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ 12ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ 1334ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻥ
ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷــﺪ؛ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﻧﻔﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ
ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﭘــﺮﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ 29ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪ
ﺳﺎﻝ 1329ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻣﻴﺘﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1334ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺖ ﺳﺎﻟﮕﺮﺩ ﺗﻮﻟﺪﺵ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻨﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﺎﺭ ﻋﻔﻮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺸﺖ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺳﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﻰ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻣﻴﺘﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺍﺩﮔﺎﻫﺶ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺁﺑﺎﺩ ﻓﺮﺳــﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺗﺤﺖﺍﻟﺤﻔﻆ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﻪﺳﺮ ﺑﺮﺩ.
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ،ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ 28ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺳﺎﻝ ،1332ﺑﺎ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺪ ،ﺣﺒﺲ
ﻭ ﺍﻋﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻬﻀﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ
ﻧﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺸﻰ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
www.mosalas.ir
®±µ²H¸ÃM
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ 15ﻛﺮﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ 10 ،ﻛﺮﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ
ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ 5ﻛﺮﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻴﺸﻞ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻌﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﻬﻤﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
35
1
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ
ﺑﻦﺑﺴﺖﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﺩﺭﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥﭘﺲﺍﺯﻳﻚﺩﻭﺭﻩﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥﻳﺎﻓﺖ
ﺟﻤﻊ ﺍﺿﺪﺍﺩ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻰ
ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﺎﻩ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺷــﻨﺒﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﺑﻦﺑﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻯ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﺘﺸﺘﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧــﻰ ﻣــﺎﻩ ژﻭﺋــﻦ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴــﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﻗﺎﻃــﻊ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ
ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺳــﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ،ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﻟﺒﻨــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑــﻞ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘــﻪﺍﻯ ﺗﻼﺵﻫــﺎﻯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﻭ
ﺍﻟــﺰﺍﻡﺁﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻓــﻰ ،ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘــﻪ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﻣﻴﺴــﺮ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.ﺳــﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ،ﺩﻭﺷــﻨﺒﻪ
ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻓﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻗﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ
ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ «.ﺳﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﺑﺮ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ،
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﺐ
ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺳﻮﺥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﭘﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﺷﻜﺎﻓﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻮﺩﺍﻯ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ 15ﻛﺮﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ 10 ،ﻛﺮﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ
ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ 5ﻛﺮﺳــﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻴﺸــﻞ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻰﻃﺮﻓﻰ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻰﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ -ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻭﻟﻴﺪ ﺟﻨﺒﻼﻁ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺯﻳﺮﻙ ﺩﺭﻭﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ ﺳــﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠــﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ -ﺟﻨﺎﺡ
ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳــﺖ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻤﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻦﺑﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺑﻦﺑﺴﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺩﻭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺯ
36
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺮﻭﺭ ﺭﻓﻴﻖ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ،
ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺪﺭ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﻼﺡ
ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ 2008
ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻋﻈﻢ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﺎﺣﺐ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ
ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻯ 15ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺭﺳﻰ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺗﻮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻝ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺑﻪﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻞ ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﻭﺷــﻨﺒﻪ
ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﻌﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎ
ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻦ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﺩﻯ
ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ،
ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺁﺳــﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻟﻴﺎﺱ ﻣﻬﻨﺎ ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﺑﻼگ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻗﻴﻔﺎ
ﻧﻘﺒﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ«.
ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠــﻰ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻋﻀــﻮ ﺍﺯ 10ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺼــﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﻣﻴﺸــﻞ ﻋﻮﻥ ،ژﻧﺮﺍﻝ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﺴــﻴﺤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻴﺸﻞ ﻋﻮﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؛
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺴﺮﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻌﺪ
ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺸﻞ ﻋﻮﻥ ﺑﻰﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺗﻼﺵﻫــﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟــﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳــﻚ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺷــﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﻻﻳﻞ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ژﻧﺮﺍﻝ ﻋــﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧــﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻪﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ
ﻣﻨﺎﻓــﻊ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ
ﺷﻮﺩ.ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻯ ژﻧﺮﺍﻝ ﻋﻮﻥ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﻋﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ.ﻣﺎﻩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﺍﮔــﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ژﻧﺮﺍﻝ ﻋﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻮﻥ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻋﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﻰ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ژﻧﺮﺍﻝ
ﻋﻮﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ،ﻣﺘﺤــﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ
ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺗــﺎﺑــﻪﺍﻳــﻦﻧﻤﺎﻳــﺶﻃﻮﻻﻧــﻰﭘﺎﻳــﺎﻥﺩﻫــﺪ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺪ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ
ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳــﻮﺩﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺩﻫﺪ؛ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
2
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﺑﺎﺳﻔﻴﺮﺳﺎﺑﻖﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺩﺭﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ
ﺁﺭﺯﻭ ﺩﻳﻠﻤﻘﺎﻣﻲ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺷـﺪ .ﺳـﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳـﺮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺟﺪﻳـﺪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﻭﺷـﻨﺒﻪ 18ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺳـﺎﻋﺖ
10ﺷـﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺳـﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻟﺒﻨـﺎﻥ ﭘﻨﺞﻣـﺎﻩ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺯﺍﻳﻤـﺎﻥ ﻛﺸـﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺧـﺮﻩ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰﺍﺵ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﻭﺷـﻨﺒﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺷـﺪ .ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﻪ ﻋﺎﻗﺒﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭﺩﺳﺮﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻰ ﺳـﭙﺮﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﻋﺎﻗﺒﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻭ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺗﺎ ﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺘﻰ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻰ ﺑﺮﻧـﺪﻩ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻣﻰﺷـﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺷﻜﺴـﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺑـﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺣﺰﺏ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺣـﺰﺏ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸـﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻳﻦ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﻮﻧﻴﻦ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ 30ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺸـﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻓﻰ ﺗﻮﺳـﻂ
ﻧﺨﺴـﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ،ﺳﻔﻴﺮ ﺳـﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﻨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ
ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻴـﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻫﺴـﺘﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻴـﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳـﺖ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ
ﺣـﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ
ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺳﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻏﺮﺑﻲﻫﺎ؟
ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻃﺎﻳﻔﻪ ﻭ ﻃﺎﻳﻔﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧــﺎﺹ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 18ﻃﺎﻳﻔــﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻳﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻃﺎﻳﻔﻪﺍﻯ
ﻗﻮﻱﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺴــﻴﺤﻴﺎﻥ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﻴﻪﮔﺎﻩ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﻫﻞ ﺳﻨﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭ ﺟﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻞﺳﺎﺯ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﭘﻴـﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨـﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺨﺴـﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺣﻤﺎﻳـﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺭﺍﻱﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺷـﺮﻛﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ،ﻋﻠﺖ
ﻋﺪﻡ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ
ﻃﻮﺍﻳﻒ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺘﻲ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ
ﻭ ﻫﻢﭘﻴﻤﺎﻧــﺎﻥ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻫــﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺭﺍﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻴﺸﻞ ﻋﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺍﻣﻞ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ،ﻫﻢﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻌﺘﺪﻝ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﻢﭘﻴﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺑﺮﺧــﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻠﻲ
ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺳــﺮﻳﻊﺗﺮ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻋــﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﺱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.
ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷﺪ ،ﭘﻴﺎﻡ
ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻮﻯﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺳــﻨﺖ -ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ -ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻔﻆ
ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟ﺍﻳﻦﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻰﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻗﺼﺪﺩﺍﺭﺩﻻﻳﺤﻪﺍﻯ
ﺭﺍﺑﻪﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥﺑﺪﻫﺪﻛﻪﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﺭﺍﺯﻳﺎﺩﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﻴﺜﺎﻕ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ،1945
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻴــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺍﻳﻒ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺍﻫﻞ ﺳﻨﺖ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ
ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻯ
ﻃﺎﻳﻔﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ
ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﻃﺎﺋﻒ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻃﻮﺍﻳﻒ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬــﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮﻱ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺳﻨﺖ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ
ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻲﻫﺎ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﻪ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺻﻔﻮﻑ ﻣﺴــﻴﺤﻲﻫﺎ ﺷﺪ ،ﻣﺒﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻮﻯﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻯ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺿﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑــﻪ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﻃﺎﺋﻒ
ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﺎ ﻣﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ
ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ،ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
ﻳﻚﺳﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻦﺑﺴﺖ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ،ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺩﻭﺣﻪ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻠﻰ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻧﺴــﺒﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺠﺪﺩﺍ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻃﻮﺍﻳﻒ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻘﺶ
ﺍﺧﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞ
ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺣﻞ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﺍﻯ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻘﺸﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ
ﭘﻨﺞ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﺎﺕ
ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢ ﻛﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻧﺒﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻳﻰ
ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺍﻳﻒ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻢ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻘﺴـﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ؟ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳـﻌﺪ
ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﭼﻨﺪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳــﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳــﺮﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﻜﻰ
ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ
ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ،ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﺎﻟﺸــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻓﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺒﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻠﺴﻄﻴﻦ ﺍﺷــﻐﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺁﺑﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺼﻪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻤﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ،ﮔﺮﭼﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﺍ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺩﺭﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳــﻤﻴﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ
ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
37
3
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻮﺭﺍﻥ
ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ
ﺷﺎﻣﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﺷﻨﺒﻪ 18ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ 136ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻌﺪﺍﻟﺤﺮﻳﺮﻯ،
ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ،ﺭﺳﻤﺎ ﺷـﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ)ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻣﺎﺭﺱ( ﺷﺎﻣﻞﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺍﷲ ،ﻧﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻴﺸـﻞ ﻋﻮﻥ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺳـﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻧﺠﻴﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺷﺎﻣﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ 15ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺭﻫﺒـﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟـﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺸﺴـﺖ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﺸـﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﺳـﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺑـﺎ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺑـﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺩﺳـﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺳـﻌﺪﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻳﺮﻯ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻟﻤﺴـﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﺷﻨﺒﻪ
ﺷﺸﻢ ﺗﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻮﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ
ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻨﺠﺸـﻨﺒﻪ 19ﺷـﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ
»ﻣﻴﺸـﻞ ﺳـﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ« ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ
ﻭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺸـﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺼﺮﺍﻑ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻴﺸﻞ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ،ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺷﻨﺒﻪ 25ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ ،ﺳﻌﺪ
ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳـﺪ ﺍﻧﺼﺮﺍﻑ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺎﻣـﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺗﺸـﻜﻴﻞ ﺷـﺪ .ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻮﺭﺍﻥ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺳـﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻳﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺸـﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺭﺍﻫﺶ
ﺑـﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴـﺖ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺸـﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺍﻣـﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳـﺪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳـﺪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳﻼﺡ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺷﻮﺩﻛﻪﺩﺭﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕﺍﺳﺖ.ﺑﺮﺧﻲﺍﺯﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱﻣﺴﻴﺤﻲ
ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳــﻼﺡ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻨﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖﻭﺩﺭﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞﺣﻤﻼﺕﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞﻣﻮﻓﻖﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖﻳﻚﻧﻮﻉﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺁﻥ ،ﻋﻤﻼ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ
ﻳﻚﺑﺮگﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩﺧﻮﺩﺭﺍﺍﺯﺩﺳﺖﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺩﺍﺩﻭﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺩﻟﻴﻞﻃﺮﻑﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻲﺭﺍﻗﺒﻮﻝﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.ﺍﻳﻦﻳﻜﻲﺍﺯﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕﺩﺭﺁﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻣﻮﺿــﻮﻉ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺤﺚ
ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﺴــﺎﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱ
ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ،ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺍﻣﺪﻱ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻐﻠﻲ
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺗــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺳﻌﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺪﻳﺸﺪ.
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ
38
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﭼﻮﺏ ﻻﻱ ﭼﺮﺥ
ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮﻱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺣﺎﻛــﻢ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﺩ .ﺑﺤﺚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻫــﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒـﺎﻁ ﺑـﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣـﺖ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫـﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺸـﺮﻭﻱ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﺭﺍﻫـﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻛـﻪ
ﺳـﻌﺪﺍﻟﺤﺮﻳﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﻳﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ 14ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ،ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪﺟﺰ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺸﻜﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺳﻼﺡ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺿﺪﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻲ
ﺳــﻼﺡ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻼﺡﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻼﺡ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺿﻤﺎﻧــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑــﻞ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣــﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﻣﻠــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺧﻠﻊﺳﻼﺡ
ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﻃﻦ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻗﺒﻼ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﺩﻏﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ
ﮔﺮﻳﺰ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﺎﺩﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﺳﻼﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻼﺡ ﺳﺒﻚ ﻭ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻼﺡ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺐ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﻱ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖﻫﺎ،
ﺳــﻼﺡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺩﻏﺎﻡ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ،ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﮕﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩﻧﻘﺶﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﺩﺭﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥﻗﺮﺍﺭﺍﺳﺖﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩﻭﻻﻳﺤﻪﺍﻱﺑﻪﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪﺩﺍﺩﻛﻪﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﺷﻮﺩ.ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻭ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﺍﺯﺑﻴﻦﻣﺴﻴﺤﻴﺎﻥﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﭼﻪﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺩﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1989ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 1975ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ 1989ﺑﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻃﺎﺋﻒ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﺑﻪﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺎﺋﻒ ﭘﻲﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ
ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﺻﻔﻪ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ
ﻭ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﺴــﻴﺤﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺁﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺩﻭﺳﻮﻡ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺩﻭﺳﻮﻡ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴــﻴﺤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺣﻘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄــﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴــﻴﺤﻲ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﺿﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﻪ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻓﺎﻻﻧﮋ
ﻭ ﺣﺰﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ 14ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﺳﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺷــﻴﻌﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠــﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻗﺒـﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺸـﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ،ﺣـﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺍﻋـﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑـﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻌﺪﺍﻟﺤﺮﻳﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺨﺴـﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺭﺍﻱﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩ .ﻋﺪﻡ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﺸــﻮﺭﺕﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ 14ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ
ﻓــﺮﺩ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨــﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻧﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﺻﻤﺖ.
ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻱ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﺮﻓــﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒــﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ
ﺑــﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ
ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ ﻣﻌﺮﻓــﻲ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺣــﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺣﻘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺳﻨﻲ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍﻱ
ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﮕﺮ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ
ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺘﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺱ ﺍﻭ ،ﺩﻣﻴﺘﺮﻯ
ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷـﺖ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﺁﺷـﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺿـﻊ ﺭﻭﺱﻫـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢﭘﻴﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳـﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺫﻛﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺳـﺦ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻧﺪﻫﺪ »ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻴﺰ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ« .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳـﺎﺱ ،ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺑﺸﺮﻯ،
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﺴـﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳﻼﺡ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒـﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﺗﻮ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭ
ﭼﻴﺰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷـﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ
ﻻﺯﻡﺍﻻﺟﺮﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﺸـﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ – ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﻫﻢ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳـﺪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻋـﺮﺍﺏ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﺴـﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻟﻰ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺁﻧﻬـﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ – ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺳـﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ :ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ )ﻳﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺑﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺨﻄﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻯ ﻛﻨﮕﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ ﭼﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠــﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭﻃﺮﻑ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﻯ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻋـﻼﻡ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﺰﻳـﻦ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﻫـﻢ ﻣﺸـﻤﻮﻝ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ
ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴـﺮﺩ .ﺿﻤـﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜـﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻴـﺎﻥ »ﺗﺠـﺎﺭﺕ« ﻭ
»ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ
ﻣﻨﻊ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻗﻼﻣﻲﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺑﻨﺰﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺁﺳــﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﺒﻮﻉ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻻﺯﻡﺍﻻﺟﺮﺍﺳﺖ
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖﺷﺎﻥ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﭘﻮﺷــﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﻝ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﻯ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻟﻴﺰﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻳﺎ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻭ
ﺿﻌﻒ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳــﻰ ﻧــﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺧﺼﻮﻣﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺣﻞ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗــﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺑﻪﺳﻤﺖ ﺧﺼﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ
ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻓﻀﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻟﻴﺰﻩ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸــﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﺍﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣــﺎﻝ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺗــﻰ ﺿﻤﻨﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧــﺪ .ﻧﻔﺲ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ
ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮﻯ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻟﺬﺍ
ﺗﺎﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮﻯ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ
ﺑﺮﺳﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻏﻨﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ NPTﻭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻏﻨﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺧﻠﻮﺹ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻴﻮﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺳــﻤﺖﻭ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ – ﺑﻪﺯﻋﻢ ﻏﺮﺏ – ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺩ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﻧﺮﻭﺩ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴـﺘﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﭼﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﺎﺛﻴـﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻨﻔﻰ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺁﻥ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ »ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ«
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﺵ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ »ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ« ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ .ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻰ
ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴــﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ 5+1ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ
ﻏﻨﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻃﻴﻒ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭﺕ .ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ
ﻛﻼﻫﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺩﺭ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ
ﺑﻪﺳﻮﻯ ﻛﺎﺳــﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻼﻫﻚﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻯ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﻣﺘﺸﻨﺞ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻰ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ
)ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ – ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ – ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ( ﺳﻼﺡ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻛﻼﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ – ﻏﺮﺏ.
ﺑﺤﺚ ﺳﭙﺮ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻚ ﻭ ﻟﻬﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ،ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﭙﺮ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺟﺰ ﻧﺮﻣﺶ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ
S - 300ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺷــﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺗﻌﻠﻞ ﻣﻲﻭﺭﺯﻧﺪ.
ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺸـﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑـﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻞ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻞ
ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﻫﺴـﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻋـﺮﺍﺏ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺏﻫﺎ
ﭼﻪ ﻧﻘﺸﻰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺧﻮﺷــﻰ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ
ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻼﺡ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ.
ﭼﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﻴﺪ؟
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣﺰﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﺸﺪﻥ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺭﺳــﻤﻲﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺳﻼﺡ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺻﻠﺢﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭼﻪ »ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻨﻰ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺳﻮﺧﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺿﺮﺭ
ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻨﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﺳﻮﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
39
ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻣﺘﻘﻲ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻋﻠﻴــﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻃﻲ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
1979ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ
ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 12ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒﺮ 2009ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻱ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ ﺷﻜﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ،ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺩﻫﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺩﻫﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺯﻣﻴﻨــﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ -ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺮﻭ ﺧــﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ
»ﻛﻨﺶ ﭘﻴﺸــﮕﻴﺮﺍﻧﻪ« ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﺻﻠــﻲ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻃﺌــﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻱ 28ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺩﻫﻲ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ
ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺩ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮﻛــﺰ ﺗﻮﻃﺌﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩﻣﺪﺕ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ
ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻱ »ﻗﻄﻊ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ« ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺭﺕ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻫﺮ ﻳــﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
»ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ« ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺸﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻜﺲﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻲ
ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒﺮ 1979ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺳــﺎﻱﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ
ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ »ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ« ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ »ﻛﻨﺶ
ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻱ« ﺩﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕــﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺶ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﻬــﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ،
ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ،
40
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺗﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻞ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ
ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺗﻐﻴﻴــﺮ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ
ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺻــﺪﺩ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱﺟﻮﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻱ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ
ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻭ ﺻﺮﻳﺤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻐﻮ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ،ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻬﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻋﻠﻴــﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ.
ﺩﺭ 12ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒــﺮ ،2009ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ
232ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻝ 1962ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺁﺷﺘﻲ« ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ -ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻃﻲ
ﺳﺎﻝ 2009ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻧﺸﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
»ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﻋﻠﻮﻱ« ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒﺮ 2009ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ
ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺗﻀﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ.
- 1ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﮔﺬﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ
ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒﺮ 1979ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ »ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ«
ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ -ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻃﻲ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
،1979 - 2009ﺑﺎ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺍﻟﻒ :ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳــﺦ 12ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒﺮ 1979ﻳﻌﻨﻲ 8ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺴــﺨﻴﺮ
ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﺟﻴﻤﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺑﺨﺶﻧﺎﻣﻪ 12170ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺿﺒﻂ 12ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ.
ﺏ :ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 14ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒﺮ ،1979ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺭﺕ
ﺑــﻪ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺝ -ﺩﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﻳــﻞ ،1980ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬــﺎ ﺑﺮ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﻓﺮﺕ ﺍﺗﺒﺎﻉ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻉ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩ :ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳــﺦ 21ژﺍﻧﻮﻳﻪ 1981ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ
ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ
ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ.
ﻩ -ﺩﺭ ژﺍﻧﻮﻳﻪ 1984ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻳﮕﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ
ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻉ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ
ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺼﺎﺭﻑ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻭ -ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1987ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻳﮕﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻱ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺯ -ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ » 1992ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻊ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ« ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ
ﻣﺎﺷــﻴﻦﺁﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻨﻊ ﺷﺪ.
ﺡ -ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1993ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻮﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻁ -ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 15ﻣﺎﺭﺱ 1995ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻮﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺰﻟﻪ
ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻱ -ﺩﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﻳﻞ 1996ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ »ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺿﺪﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴﻢ« ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻱ
ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻬﻀﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﺑﺨﺶ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪ.
ﻙ -ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ -ﻟﻴﺒﻲ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ »ﺍﻳﻠﺴﺎ« )(ILSA
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻛﻨﮕﺮﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻫﺮ ﺷﺮﻛﺘﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻱ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺍﺯ 20ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻝ -ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺑﺨﺶﻧﺎﻣﻪ 13059ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻮﻥ ،ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺷﺪ.
ﻡ -ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘــﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻨﻊ
»ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻪﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﺪ.
ﻥ -ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒﺮ ﺳــﺎﻝ 2000ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻊ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ
ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷــﺪ .ﻫــﺪﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ.
ﺕ -ﺍﺯ ژﻭﺋﻴﻪ 2006ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 21ژﻭﺋﻴﻪ
2006ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،1696ﺩﺭ 23ﺩﺳــﺎﻣﺒﺮ 2006ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،1737
ﺩﺭ 24ﻣﺎﺭﺱ 2007ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 1747ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺭﺱ
2008ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣــﻪ 1803ﻭ ﺩﺭ 30ﺳــﭙﺘﺎﻣﺒﺮ 2008ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣــﻪ
1835ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼــﻮﺏ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ
ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺷﺎﻫﺪ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻠﻲ،
ﻣﻠﺖ ،ﺳــﭙﻪ ،ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺸــﺘﻴﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﻫﺮ ﻳــﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺠــﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﻛﻢ ﺷﺪﺕ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ 1979 -2009
ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﻭﺳﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺭﺕ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
- 2ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺁﺷﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ -ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ ،ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ
ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍژﻩ »ﻧﻪ« ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ »ﺷﺎﻳﺪ« ﺑﻪ »ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ« ﻭ ﺍﻧﺸﺎءﺍﷲ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺯﻳﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
-ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ،ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ )ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺎﺭﺍﻙ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ( ،ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴــﻦ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺑﻮﺭﻭﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﺳــﺎﺯﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺍﻟﻒ -ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﺑﻮﺭﻭﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ،
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣــﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺏ -ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻨﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺫﻱﻧﻔﻮﺫ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺝ -ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ،ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬــﻮﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﮔﻮﺍﻫــﻲ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳــﺖ ،ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺩ -ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﻳﻜﺠﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬــﻮﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧــﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ »ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳــﻲ« ) (Executive Order
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ
ﻛﻨﮕﺮﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺩﻫﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺣــﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ
ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻉ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
41
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭﺁﻳﻨﻪﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﮔﺮﻣﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ؛ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ،ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ
ﻫﻢﺻﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﺳﺠﺎﺩﭘﻮﺭ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻜﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣــﺎ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﻣــﺪﻭﺩﻑ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ
14ﻧﻮﺍﻣﺒــﺮ (88/8/23) 2009ﺩﺭ
ﺳــﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺳــﺮﺍﻥ
ﺁﭘﻚ ،ﺩﺭ ﺗــﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻧﻮﻳــﻦ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ،ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠــﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﺳــﺎﻣﺒﺮ ) 2009ﺩﻱ ،(1388
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺳــﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ 10ﺩﺳﺎﻣﺒﺮ ) 19ﺁﺫﺭ( ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩ ﻧﻮﺑﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﻪﻫﻢ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺖﺍﻧﺪﺭﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺑﻪﻫﻢ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﮔﺮﻡﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﮔﺮﻣﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﭼﻴﺴــﺖ؟ ﻃﻲ ﭼﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ؟ ﻭ
ﭘﻲﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻨﺪ؟
ﺍﻟﻒ :ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﮔﺮﻣﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ؛ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻋﻄﻔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﺪ .ﻧﮕﺮﺵ
ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ،ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﻮﺵ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻫــﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧــﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺵ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻲ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ.
ﻧﻈﺎﻡﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ) (Cognitive Systemﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻮﺵ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﺗﺤﻘﻴﺮﺁﻣﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ 2003ﺁﺯﺭﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﺟﺪﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑــﻼ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﺵ ﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺷــﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺵ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ
42
ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴــﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﮔﺮﻣﺎﻱ ﺧــﺎﺹ ﻭ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ.
ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻫﮋﻣﻮﻧﻲ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺳﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ
ﺟﺪﻱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﻣﻬﺎﺭ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻧﺎﺗﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻕ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﭙﺮ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻲ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﮔﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ،ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﺷﺪ.
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻛﻨــﺶ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻮﻕ ،ﺗﺤــﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﮕﺮﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ،ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ،ﺍﺯ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ،
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ ،ﺷــﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ
ﻣﺤﺘﺎﻃﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻌﻞﻭ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﻳﻚ ﺷــﺒﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﮕﺮﻓــﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻱ ﭘﻮﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺏ :ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ؛ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﺍﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻟــﺰﻭﻡ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺭﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﻩ )ﺁﻭﺭﻳﻞ (2009ﺩﺭ
ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺴــﺖ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳﻼﺡ
ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ
60ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﺸــﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳــﻲ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺣﻠﻘــﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ
ﺭﻭﺳﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳﻼﺣﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻫﻤﭙﻮﺷﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺳﭙﺮ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻟﻬﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺎﺭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺟﻠﺐ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭﺝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺳﭙﺘﺎﻣﺒﺮ ) 2009ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻣﻬﺮ( ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﻭ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﻗﻄﻊﻧﺎﻣﻪ
1887ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳﻼﺣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻭﺩﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ
ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻭ ﻣــﺪﻭﺩﻑ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺳــﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺭﻓﺘﻨــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭﺕ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭﺕ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ
ﺗﺴﻠﻴﺤﺎﺕ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﺳﺎﻣﺒﺮ 2009
) (88/9/14ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﻮﺭﺑﺎﭼﻒ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺵ
ﭘﺪﺭ ﺩﺭ 1991ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻼﻫﻚﻫﺎﻱ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱﺩﻭﻛﺸﻮﺭﺑﻪﺳﻘﻒ 1700ﺗﺎ 2200ﻋﺪﺩﻛﺎﻫﺶﻳﺎﺑﺪ.ﺩﺭﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ 2002ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻼﻫﻚﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘــﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺮﻣﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺝ :ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ ،ﮔﺮﻣﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺑﺮﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ
ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ
ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳــﻼﺡ ﺩﺭ ژﻧﻮ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ .ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ
ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻭ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ
ﻭ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺟﺪﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ
ﺑﻪ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺎﻋﻪ ﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﻲ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﻛﻨﻮﺍﻧﺴــﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳــﻼﺣﻲ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺗﺴــﻠﻴﺤﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻓﺰﻭﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳﻼﺣﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﻮﺵ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻫﻤﭙﻮﺷﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺗﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ
ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﺧﻠﻊ ﺳــﻼﺣﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﻭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﻘﻂ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﻫﺴــﺖ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
www.mosalas.ir
jI~T¤H
ﺧﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫــﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮگﺭﻳﺰﺍﻧﻰ ﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻬــﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺳﺨﺘﻜﻮﺵﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﮔﻼﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻮﺷﻪ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺗﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ.
43
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺩﻫﻪ 50ﺗﺎ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺩﻫﻪ 80
ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﻤﻠﻮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﺱ ﻭ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ
ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻰ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﻫﻪ 40ﺳــﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺨﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺖ
ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻻﺑﻪﻻﻯ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺩﻫﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺯﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 50ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﻠﺦ ﻣﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﭽﻴــﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﻭ ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺷــﺘﺮﺍﻛﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺩﻫــﻪ 40ﻳﺎ 50ﺑﺎ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﻳﺎ 70ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗــﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ
ﺩﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺖ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﻴﺮ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﭼﻪ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﺷــﻜﻞ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ
ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻳﻜﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺭﻓﺘﻨــﺪ .ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻧﻤــﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ
ﺑــﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻭ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻫﻪ 50ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ» :ﺷﺎﻩ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﭼﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺳــﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ «.ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻛﻴﺪ ﺷﺎﻩ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﺪﻝ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﺮﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺷﻬﺮﻧﺸﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩﺷﺪ.
ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﺝﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻗﻴﻤــﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻌﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺷــﺪﺕ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺳﻨﺘﻰﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩﺑﻮﺩ.ﺩﺭﭘﻰﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯﻧﻔﺘﻰ،ﺟﻬﺖﮔﻴﺮﻯ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﻓــﺖ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻗﻢ 4323ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1342ﺑﻪ ﺭﻗﻢ 49365ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ
ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1357ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻋﻮﺍﻳﺪ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻰ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺑﻮﺩ.ﺁﻧﺎﻥﺍﺯﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦﺑﺨﺶﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻛﻠﻰ
ﺑﻰﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.ﺳﺎﻝ 1352ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯﻧﻔﺘﻰﺑﻴﺶﺍﺯﭼﻬﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﺳﺎﻝ
1342ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺮﺥ 18000ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ
ﺳﺒﺐﺭﺷﺪ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻯﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯﺷﺪ.ﺩﻭﻟﺖﺍﺯﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊﺭﺍﻧﺖﻣﻴﺎﻥﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰﺍﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥﺑﺨﺶﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﻌﻰﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻧﺎﻋﺎﺩﻻﻧﻪ ﺭﺍﻧﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1356-57ﺳﻬﻢ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪﺩ 9/1ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺻﻨﻌﺖ 18/5ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﻣﻠــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺳــﻬﻢ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻃﻰ ﺳﺎﻝ
1346ﺗﺎ 1352ﺑﻴﻦ 106ﺗﺎ 333ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔــﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﮔﺮﻭﻫــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﭘﻮﺯﻳﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ،
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨــﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺯﻯ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ،ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
44
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ» :ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﻯ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ،ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﺯﺳﺎﻝ 1352ﺑﻪﺑﻌﺪ،ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻗﺴــﻤﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻳﺪ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻧﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﻭﺍﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻢ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﺩ ﺳﺮﺷﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ«.ﻛﺎﻫﺶﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯﺳﺒﺐﺷﺪﺗﺎﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕﺍﺯ
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺑﻪﺷﻬﺮﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶﻳﺎﺑﺪ.ﺣﺪﻓﺎﺻﻞﺳﺎﻝ 1342ﺗﺎ1357
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻫﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 1/2ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ
4/6ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻓﻮﻕﻧﻴﺰﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥﻣﻲﺳﺎﺧﺖﻛﻪ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻫﺎﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ 333ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺮﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ 60ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻜﻨﺴــﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ »ﭘﻨﺠﻤﻴﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺻﻨﻌﺘــﻰ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﺍﻯ
ﺳــﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺠﻢ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﺑــﻪ 60ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ 60ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ
ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﭘﻠﻴﺴﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ
ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ» :ﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻔﺮﻭﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﮔﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻄﻖ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻧﻴﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ «.ﺍﺳــﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻭﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻰ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻣﻮﺭﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﻨﺪ
ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻲﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﺟﺎ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺨﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﻚﺭﻗﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ
ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﻧـﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧﺮﺥ ﺑﻴـﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻗﻤـﻲ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧـﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺶﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺷﻴﺦﺍﻻﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻧﺶ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝﺯﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﻘﺸﻰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﻞﻗﻮﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﮕﺸﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺸـﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺷـﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﻧﻘﺸـﻪﺍﻯ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻴﺦﺍﻻﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﺘﺒﻮﻉ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻭ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺴﻮﻯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻰﺷﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﻃﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻌﻰ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻰﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﻛﻤﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺷﻰ
ﺳﺨﺘﻜﻮﺷﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻪﺩﺳـﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻯ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺷـﻴﻮﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻱ 50ﻭ 60
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺟﻬﺮﻣﻲ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳـﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺳـﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧـﺪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺑـﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳـﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩﻩ ،ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﺸﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺳـﺨﺖ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻠﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺷـﻴﻮﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤـﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺎﻳﻠﻨﺪ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻳـﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﺟﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺴﻮﻯ ﺍﻗﻴﺎﻧﻮﺱ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺩﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ ،ﻛﺸﺘﻴﺮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺁﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻨﮕﻼﺩﺵ ﻟﻨﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳـﻴﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﺷﺮﻗﻰ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷـﻮﺩ .ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺁﺳـﻴﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﭼﻴﻨﻰﻫﺎ ﻳـﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑـﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻃﻰ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻻﺳﺘﻴﻚﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺼﻔﻴﻪ ﭼﺎﻯ
ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﺎﻋﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ ﺯﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻧﺸـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ .ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﻖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺷﻴﺦﺍﻻﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻭﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻮﻳﺪﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺿﻴﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺳﺎﻝ 1355ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻓﺎﺯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺗﺮﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻍ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻐﺎﺯﻩﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺧﺮﺩﻩﭘﺎ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻻﻻﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ،ﻗﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺷﻜﺮ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳــﺎﺯﺩ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻓﺸﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ» :ﺷﺎﻩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻘﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺭﺍﻙ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﺐ
ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴــﻢ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻤﻨﺪﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤــﺮﺍﻩ ﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﻮﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻰﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ «.ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺛﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥﻗﺎﺑﻞﺩﺭﻙﻧﺒﻮﺩ»:ﺩﺭﺫﻭﺏﺁﻫﻦﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺟﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ
ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ،ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻭﺏﺁﻫﻦ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻩ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺐ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ «.ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺫﻭﺏﺁﻫﻦ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻰﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻫﻪ 50ﺑﺎ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﮔﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺩﻫﻪ 50ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻃﻠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ
ﻳﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻫﻪ 50
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﺳﺎﺯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﺪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺷــﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻒ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ 50ﺗﺎ
80ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺴــﺖﻭﺟﻮﻯ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ
ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 50
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺻﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 80ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺭﺷﺪ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻃﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﺳﺖ
ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﺷﺪ
ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻘﺪﻯ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﻣﻐــﺎﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
45
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ:
ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺣﻖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺣﻖ ﺿﺎﻳﻊﻛﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﺰﺍﺩﻩ -ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻖ
ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻬﺮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻗﺼﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ
ﺩﻫﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ .ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺮﻣﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﺗﻼﺷـﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﻮﻳﻰ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺮﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﺕ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
46
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﺳﺎﺯﻯ؟
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﻫﺮﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻛﻨﻔﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻛﺸــﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﻭ
ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻔﻘﻮﺩﻩ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ.
ﺍﮔـﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃـﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ﺑـﺎ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻯ ﻛـﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ
ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﻜﻴﻪﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ NGOﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺗﻀﺎﺩﻫـﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔـﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ،ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ،ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭﻯ ،ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖ ،ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ
ﻛﺴﺐ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ .ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻗﻮﻯﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ.
ﺍﻻﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻓﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭ ﻭ ﺧﻼﻕ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺣﺎﻻ! ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻰ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻳﺎ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻳﻚ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭ ﻭ ﺧﻼﻕ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻰ ﻇﻠﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ،
ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺒﺮ ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮﻑﻛﻨﻨــﺪﻩ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺳــﻬﻞﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥﺗﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ
ﻛﺎﻻ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﺼﺮﻑﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌــﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﺘــﻰ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺖ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺯﻳﺮﺳــﺎﺧﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ
ﻓﻌﻼ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ؟
ﻧﻪ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﻣﻔﻘﻮﺩﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺗﻬﺎﺗﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺮﻣﻰ ،ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﻣﺠــﻮﺯ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻴــﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣــﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺳﺲ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧـﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷـﺪﻥ ﺑﻨﺪ »ﺯ« ﺑﻪ ﻣـﺎﺩﻩ 21ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﻓﺸـﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺗﺴـﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳـﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ.
ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻴــﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺒﺮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻓﻌﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻛﻼﻥ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﺪ .ﺑﺨﺶ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ
ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﻜﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﺷـﺮﻁ ﭘﺎﻳﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻭﺭﻯ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻰ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﻴــﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺒﺮﻳﺪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺯﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﺍﻥ
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻧﻤﻲﻧﻮﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺣﺘﻤﺎ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ،ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠــﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻀﻮ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﺪ.
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳـﺖ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﭼﻪ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ 87ﻭ 98ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎ
ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﻨﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻭ ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺗﻔﻜﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﻗﺮﺁﻧﻰ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺣـﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﺪ؟
ﻣﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 60 ،50ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
ﻛﺮﺩﻳــﻢ .ﻣــﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺷــﻤﺎ
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻪ ،ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻢ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻴﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻕ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻠﺤﻖ
ﻳﻌﻨـﻰ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻗﺎﻧـﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻴـﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﻣﻴﺘﻴﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ
200ﻣـﺎﺩﻩﺍﻯ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻣـﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ
ﻫﺮﻧــﻮﻉ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣــﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ
ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻛﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎ
ﺷﺮﻋﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ
ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ.
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻳــﺎ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑــﻂ ﺧــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺑﻴــﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺿﺎﻳﻊ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺷﺮﻋﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ،ﺑﻴﻤــﻪ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ
ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯﺍﺵ ﻭ ﺳــﻨﻮﺍﺗﺶ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﻜﻰﺍﺵ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻞ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺸــﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﺰﺋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺰﺋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺼﻮﻟﺶ ﻣﺠﺰﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻟﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻌﺪﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﺘﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻭ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ؟
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﺳﺨﺘﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻖ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻖ
ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺷﻪ ﻛﺸﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻧﻮﺭﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻳﺪ؟
ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻃﻮﺭﻯ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻴﺘﻴﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺣﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻖ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﻼﻥ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺿﺎﻳﻊ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺷــﺮﻋﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻋﻴﺐ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻨﻮﻳﺴﺪ.
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺸﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﺜﻼ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﺣﺎﻻ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺸــﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺸــﺖ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ،ﻫﻔﺖ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺑﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺮ ﺗﻄﻮﺭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻡ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻛﻨﻴﺪ.
ﻣﺮﺧﺼﻰ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻡ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪﺍﻯ
ﭘﺲ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳـﺘﻴﺪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧـﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ،ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ
ﻛﻨﻴـﺪ ،ﺑﻪﺟـﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣـﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿـﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺰﺑﻰ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﻳﻢ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ
ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻪﺿﺮﻭﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ،ﺿﺮﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﻢ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺳﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﭼﺎپ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﺮﻛﺲ ﻫﺮﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧــﻪ ،ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣــﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫــﻢ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 84ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ .ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
47
ﺑﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ...
ﭘﺲ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻓﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺁﻗـﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺮﻣﻲ ،ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺼـﺎﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﻑ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻣﺜﻞ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ 11ﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸﺖ ﻫﺮﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻋﺘﺼـﺎﺏ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻼﻧـﺶ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺟﺪﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧـﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻳﺎ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﺣﻘﺎﻕ ﺣﻖ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ؟
ﺍﺣﻘﺎﻕ ﺣﻖ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣـﺎ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻧﺮﻭﺩ ،ﭼﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺿﻤﺎﻧﺘــﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻋﺘﺼــﺎﺏ؟ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺿﻤﺎﻧﺘﻰ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺑﺰﻧﻴﻢ؟ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ
ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ ...ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﺩﻭ
ﺁﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻧﻪ ،ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﻴﻢ.
ﺑﻠﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻫﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻢ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﻗﺼــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞ
ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﺣﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﺨﺺ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ
ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻢ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺑﺮﺳــﺎﻧﺪ .ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺿﺮﺭ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﭼﻬـﺎﺭ ﻳﺎ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺣﻘـﻮﻕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ،ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ...ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ،ﺣﺎﻻ ﺷﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻳﺪ.
ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﻧﻪ ،ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﺣــﺪﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ
ﺩﻭ ،ﺳــﻪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﭼﻪ ﻋﻠﺘﻰ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ؟ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ
48
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺣﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻛﻴﺎﻥﺗﺎﻳﺮ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻻﺳـﺘﻴﻚ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺯ
ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻫﺮ ﻭﺍﺣــﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺸــﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻥﺗﺮ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ؟
ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺝ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﺑﺤﺜﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺮﺳﻰ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 8ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺪﻫﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑـﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺑـﺎ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ
ﺁﻥ 10ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺑﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 84ﻳﺎ 85ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﻠﻎ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪ؟
ﻓﻜﺮﻛﻨﻢﺍﻳﻦﺳﻮﺍﻝﺟﺰﺑﺮﺍﻯﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﺷﺎﻳﻌﻪﺍﻯﺭﺍﻣﻄﺮﺡﻛﻨﺪﭼﻴﺰﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺑﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 84ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ 10ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﻧﻰ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺑﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ
ﺩﺭﺳﺎﻝ 84ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ 18ﻳﺎ 19ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪﺗﺨﺼﻴﺺﺁﻥﻛﻤﺘﺮ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻰ ،ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺕ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻰ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺳﻰ .ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩ.ﺍﺻﻼﻣﻦﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻡﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺧﺎﻧﻪﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﺳﻮءﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺣﺴــﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻖ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻳﺎ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻫﺮ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻳــﺎ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺮﺳﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺨﻔﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺮﻭﻳﺪ
ﺑﭙﺮﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻭ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺳـﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺯ
ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﭙﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻢ.
ﻇﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻣﺎ
ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻓﻌﻼ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻳﻚ ﺳـﻮﺍﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﺨﺼﻰ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳـﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎ
ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻌﻨـﻰ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻳـﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫـﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔـﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ .ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺭﺳــﻢ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴــﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺑﻌﻀﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺻﻔﺶ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭘﺲ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻰ ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﺻﻼ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴـﺮﺍﺕ ،ﺩﻳـﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠـﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻯ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ؟
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻴﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ
ﺗﺸــﻜﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ
ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭘﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴـﺐ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺸـﻜﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ
ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺎﻟﺒﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺭﺍﻯ ﺗﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺮ ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻻﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺗﺸﻜﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﻳﺎ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ؟ ﺍﺻﻼ
ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎ ،ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺳـﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ.
ﭘـﺲ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣـﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻴــﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻗﻮﻯﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ
ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ .ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺗﺸــﻜﻞ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﺪﻟﻲ
ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺭﺳـﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺳﻪﺭﻗﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺭﺳـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ
ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﻓﻀـﺎﻱ ﻭﻳـﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻳﺠـﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑـﻮﺩ .ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ
ﺧﺎﻧـﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔـﺮ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔـﻮ ﺑـﺎ ﻣﺜﻠـﺚ ،ﻋﻮﺍﻗـﺐ ﺍﺟـﺮﺍﻱ
ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﻓﺴـﺎﺩ ،ﻓﺸـﺎﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴـﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴـﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺳـﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺭﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻪﺭﻗﻤﻲ
ﺩﺍﻧﺴـﺖ .ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻬـﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻛﺴـﺎﻧﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﭘـﺎﻱ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻼﺱ ﺩﺭﺱ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷـﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺗﺸﺒﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻴـﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ،
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺁﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺯﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺗــﻮﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﺎ ﺭﻳﺨﺖ .ﺻﺪﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻞ
ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺷﻮﻙ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻼ ﺷﻮﻙ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ.
ﺷــﻮﻙ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪﺷــﻜﻞ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺷﻮﻙ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﺷﻮﻙﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ ﻭ ﭘﻲﺩﺭﭘﻲ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺕ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺶ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣــﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺣﺎﻟﺶ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻋﺎﻗﻼﻧﻪ ﻭ
ﺁﻫﺴــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ
ﺑﺮﺟﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘــﺪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﻙ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﻠﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ؛ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺭﻛﻮﺩﻱ
ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻛــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ
ﺭﻛﻮﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﺠﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻌﺎﻟﺠﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻧﺴﺨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
49
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺣﻞ ﻣﻌﻀﻼﺕ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺁﺳـﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺗﻮﺳـﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ؟ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﻻﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ .ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ،ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ،ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻓﻘﺮﺍ ،ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ،
ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ...ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﻭﺯﻥ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻴﻞ ﻣﻼﻃﻔﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺳﻴﻞ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺸــﻮﻧﺘﺶ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑــﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ،ﺳــﻴﻞ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﻭﺑﻨﺸــﻴﻨﺪ ﺁﺑﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﮔﻮﺍﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻥ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻼﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ.
ﭼﻨﮕﻴﺰ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳــﻴﻞ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻥﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﺎﻥ ﺷــﻬﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺮﻋﺘﻲ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﻴﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﻞ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﮕﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻟﻄﻴﻒ ،ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﻲ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺏ ﺯﻻﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻃﻐﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻣــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺍﺑﺘﻬﺎﺝ ﺗﻜﻪ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻣﺎ ﮔﻮﺷــﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ
ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ.
ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻢ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑـﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﺩﻭﺳﻮﻡ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻓﻌﻼ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺘﻔﻖ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻀﺎﻓﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﺸــﻬﻮﺭﻧﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ،
ﭘﺲ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺟﺰﻭ ﻋﻘﺎﻳﺪﺵ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻘﺎﻳﺪﺵ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﻳﻚ ﻫﺠﻮﻡ ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﻪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﻨﺪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺁﻥ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻋﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻛﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﭘﺲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻨﺎﺣﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ﭘﻮﺳﺘﻴﻦ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺣﺮﺍﺝ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺒﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﭘﻮﺳﺘﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﺮ ﺟﺎﻳﺶ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﻤﻜﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻌﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲﻫﺎ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻧﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺼﺪ ﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻋﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩﻫﺎﺩﺭﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻻﻳﺤﻪﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻈـﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻــﻞ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﮔﻨﺠﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻱ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﻗﺒﻼ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ
13ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 13ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﺁﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺳﺮﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻦ
ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﻛﺸــﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 14ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 13ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ .ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
50
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻦ ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺒﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﺸﺪ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑـﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﭼﻨﻴـﻦ ﻣـﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ؟ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺳـﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺑـﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺮﺥ
ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺑﻪﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺰﺩ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﺎﺳــﺒﻪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﻣﺰﺩ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺘﻲ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩﻫﺎ ﺻﺪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ
ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻨﺰﻳﻦ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﻨﺰﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﺰﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺛﺮﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﭘﻮﺷﺸﻲ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷـﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻛﻢﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷـﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻧﺸﻮﻳﻢ .ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑـﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ؟
ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭﺳﻮﺳــﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻌﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ .ﻗﺪﺭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ
ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ،
ﻧﺮﺥ ﺍﺭﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺮﺥ ﺍﺭﺯ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻔﻌﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ .ﺑﻪﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ
ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺳﺮﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺳﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺕ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ
ﺗﺎ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺟﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺍﺭﺯ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻧﻘﺪﻳﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻙ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺣﺎﻻ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻗﺼﺪ ﭘﺎﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺗﻮﻓﺎﻧﻲ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﺭﺯﻭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺳﻪﺭﻗﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ
ﻳﻚﺭﻗﻤﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻪ ﺻﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﻜﻨﺎﺱﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺳــﻪﺭﻗﻤﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺬﻑ
ﺳﻪ ﺻﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ
ﺳﻪﺭﻗﻤﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ
ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﻪﺭﻗﻤﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺟﺮﺍﺕ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺭﻳﺰﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺗﻮﻓﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ.
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺳﻪﺭﻗﻤﻲ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﭽﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﺮﺳــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﭽﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ .ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺧﻮﻥ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ
ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺳﻤﺒﻞ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻛــﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤــﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﻴــﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻲ ﺻﻴﺎﻧﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺻﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﺎﺷﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻗﺒﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ،ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺗﻠﺨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺼﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؛ ﻓﻀــﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ،
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ،ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻳﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺧﺮﻭﺷﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭﻳﻢ .ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻣــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻳﻢ
ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﺍﺟﻲ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻡ ﺍﻏﻨﻴﺎ ﺑﺮﻳﺰﻳﻢ.
ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﻣــﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻛﻨﻴــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣــﻮﺍﺝ ﺣﺎﺻﻠﺶ
ﻳﻚ ﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ،ﻧﻪ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪﺑﻠﻜﻪﻓﻘﺮﺍﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂﺷﺎﻥﺷﮕﻔﺖﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺗﺮﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺷﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﺪ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺘﻜﺪﻱ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ .ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺩﻫﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﺍﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺿﺮﺏ ﻭ ﺯﻭﺭ ﭘﻮﻝ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﭼﺎﻕﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺑﻪﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻳﻚ ﻫﻴﻜﻞ ﻓﺮﺑﻪ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﺎﺑﻚ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﭼﺎﺑﻜﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ
ﻭ ﻣﻔﺎﺳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ
ﭘﺎﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﭘﺮﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺻﻔﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺣﺎﻣﻞﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻣﺰﻳﺖ ﻧﺴـﺒﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ
ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷـﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻧﻔﺖ ﺧﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
90ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﺨﺮﻳــﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ 95ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﺨﺮﻳﻢ .ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻻﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻻﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷﻴﺪ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺰﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺮ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺰﻳﺖﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻮﻕ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ
ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ؟ ﺧﻂ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭼﮕﻮﻧـﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺘﻲ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ؟
ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻼﺱ ﺩﺭﺱ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻀــﺎ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﻱ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﮔﺸﺖ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﭘﺸــﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻧﺎﻥ
ﻓﺎﻧﺘﺰﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨــﻲ ﺍﺭﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻗﻨﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﻧﺘﺰﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﺭﺩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﻭﺷﺪ.
ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﺪﻻﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﺁﻳﻨــﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﻛــﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﻧﺘﺰﻱ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻢ ﺗــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻧﺪﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺑــﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻧﺎﻥﻫﺎ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺻﺎﻑ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻳﻲ 500ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ .ﺧﺴــﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﺎﺷــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻳﻚ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺤﺎﺳــﺒﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺁﻥ ﺑــﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻔﺮ
166ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ 250ﻛﻴﻠﻮ ﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺳــﺎﻝ .ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﻱﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﺎ 200ﻛﻴﻠﻮ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ 300ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡ
ﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ 300ﺗﺎ 400ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻫﺮ ﻛﻴﻠﻮ ﻧﺎﻥ
ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ 120ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ .ﻛﻞ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﭘﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ 120ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﺎﻳﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻛﺎﻻﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻴﺐ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺳــﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﺠﺎﻧــﻲ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺁﺏ ،ﺑﺮﻕ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻃﺒﺦ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﻧﺘﺰﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺁﻳــﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺁﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﻮ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﮔﺮﺳــﻨﮕﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﭼﻄـﻮﺭ؟ ﻣﮕﺮ ﭼﻨﻴـﻦ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻣـﻲ ﺍﻣـﻜﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻲﺷــﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺿﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺳﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺣﺬﻑ
ﺁﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﻣﺖ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺩﺭ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﮔﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺭﻳﺎﻟﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺧﻂﻣﺸـﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧـﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ؟ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝ 84ﺑﺎ ﺷـﻌﺎﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ﻭ
ﺩﻫﻚﻫـﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌـﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻳﻌﻨـﻲ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﭼﭗ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳـﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳـﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺳـﺘﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﮔﻨﺠﺎﻧﺪ؟
ﻛﺴﺐ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺩﻟﺴــﻮﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ
ﻓﻘﺮﺍ .ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﭽﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ ،ﺩﻭﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻤﻨﺪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻤﻨﺪ
ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻭﺵ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺎﻝ ﺷــﺒﻴﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﺯﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﻲ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭼﭗ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﻫــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴــﻦ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﻟﻴﻮ ﺷﺌﻮﭼﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻛﺎﻻ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺬﻣﻮﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻔﻮﻟﻴــﺖ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ
ﻛﻮﺩﻛﻲ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺒﺘﻼ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻴﺖ
ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﺒﻴﺢ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭﻳﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ،
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺘــﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻱ ﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺟﺐ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲ ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﺶ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﭙﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺭﻡ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻲ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﺳــﺘﺒﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸــﺘﻲ ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺳــﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻃﻼ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻣﻲ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔــﻲ ﻣﻲ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺯﺩﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺳﺎﻻﺭ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺯﺩﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ،ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻮﻱ ﻫﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻮﺷﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭ ﺑﺨﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻏﺎﻝ ﺳــﻨﮓ ﮔﺮﻡ
ﻣﻲ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺟﻠﻮ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ
ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻭﺳــﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻜﺸــﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﭼﺸــﻤﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺜﻼ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺑﺎﺩ ،ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪ ﻭ ...ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﺮﺍﻋﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪ ،ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﺮﺍﻋﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺗﺎﺑﻠﻮﻳﻲ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻧﻤﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻤﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ
ﺣﺮﻛﺘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺳــﺘﺎﻧﺪﻩ
ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻧﻤﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺩﺍﺩ
ﻭﺍﺯﺧﻮﺩﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢﺍﻧﺮژﻱﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺖﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻫﻮﺷــﻨﮓ ﺍﺑﺘﻬﺎﺝ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻧﻲ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻭﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺗﺶ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺭﺿﺎﺷــﺎﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺑﺘﻬﺎﺝ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻟﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﻭﺳﻮﺳــﻪ ﺷﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻢ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷﻢ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺭﻳﺰﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ
ﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﻲﺧﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺰﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﻳﺰﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺖ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣــﺎﻥ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺭﻓــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻧﺮﺳــﻴﺪ .ﺍﻭ
ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻡ ﺷــﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭﻣﺎﻩ 1320ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ،ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﺗﻜﻪ
ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻣﻦ ﮔﻮﺷﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ.
51
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻌﻢ ﺑﻰﭘﻮﻟﻰ
ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ
ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﺪ،
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧــﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﻤﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻣﻰ،
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺮﺳــﻰ ﺻــﺪﺍﺭﺕ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺟﻬﺮﻣﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻤﺘﻰ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﺍﻯ
ﺑﻰﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺟﻤﻠﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺟﻬﺮﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺟﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀــﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻯ ﺟﺪﻯ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﭘﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ
ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰﻯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1388ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ
ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﺎﻥ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ ﺳــﺎﻝ 88ﺗﻨﻬﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫــﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑــﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭ
ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻔﺖ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﻯ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ
52
ﻣﻰﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻨﮕﺪﺳﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺿﺢﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺩﺭﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺭﺷﺪ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺣﺘﻢ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮگﺭﻳﺰﺍﻧﻰ ﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ
ﺳﺨﺘﻜﻮﺵﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﮔﻼﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻮﺷﻪ
ﻭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺗﻮﻯ ﻭﺍﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔــﻰ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ
ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ .ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻜﻮﺗﻰ
ﺳــﺨﺖ ﻓﺮﻭﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻫﺮﺩﻡ
ﻧﺠﻮﺍ ﺳــﺮ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﻨــﺪﺩ .ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺧﺎﻧــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨــﺪﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻥ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ «.ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻛﻼﻡ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺗﻨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﺑﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﻧﺪ.
ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺼﺮﻓــﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﺨﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺗﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠــﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺴــﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻟــﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺎﺏ
ﻣﻰﺳــﺎﺯﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪ ﮔﺬﺭ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ» .ﺩﻣﻴﻨــﻮﻯ« ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫــﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ
ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻛــﻒ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻰﻫﺪﺍﻳﺘﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﺮﻛﺸــﻰ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺳﺮﻛﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺬﺭ ﻭ ﻛﺴــﺐﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺑﺪﻝ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧــﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺩﻟﻤﺸــﻐﻮﻟﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻓﺎﺳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺗﻠﺨﻜﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺫﻫﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 88ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻳﺎ ﺷﺶ ﻣﺎﻩ
ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺟﻤﻠﮕــﻰ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺪﻡ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺣﻘــﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺷــﻰ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻳــﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻳــﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻔﻠــﻰ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺭﻧﺠﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺗﺠﻤﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ
ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﻌﻄﻞ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷــﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻻﺳﺘﻴﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ
ﻳﺎ ﻗﺼﺪﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﻔﻴﻪ ﭼﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺳﺎﻝ 88
ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﮋﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻧﺪﺍﻯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻚ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ
ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺩﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺭﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ.
ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ ﭘﻨﺠﻜﻲ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ،
ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺳــﻮﺧﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﮔﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺷــﺪﻥ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫــﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺳــﻮﺩﻩ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ
ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺳــﻮﺧﺖ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ
ﺳــﻮﺧﺖ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﭼﻄﻮﺭ
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺳﻮﺧﺖ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﻤﻚ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﺸﺘﺎﺑﺪ«.
ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴــﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧــﻪ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻧﻘﺪﻱ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﻛﺎﻏﺬ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻬﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻳــﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪ ﻃــﺮﺡ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 88ﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ؛
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻧﮓ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺎ ﻛﺠﺎ ؟ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻛﺠﺎ؟
ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻟﻨﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻄﻖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﻚﻫــﺎﻯ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻯ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛــﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﻫﻚ ﺑﻪ ﮔــﺬﺭﺍﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔــﻰ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧــﺪ .ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ
ﺩﻫﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻯ ﻗﺼﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺍژﻩ » ﺩﻫﻚ « ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣــﺬﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑــﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻛﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﺎﻯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻰ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ
ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻫﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷــﻰ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ
ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻫﻚ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﻛﺴﻰ
ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻫﻚ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻜﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﻚﻫﺎ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻫﻚ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻘﺪﺍ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺩﻫﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﻫﻚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ«.
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥﻛﻴﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﺍﺋﺪ ﺩﻫﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗﺮ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ،ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ«.
ﺍﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺸــﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻠﻲ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺗﺨﺼﻴﺺ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺸــﺮ ﻛﻢﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﻭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ «.ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥﻛﻴﺎ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ
ﻭ ﺳﺒﺪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﻧﺎﺷــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ،
ﺧﻠﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ«.
ﺍﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ،
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ«.
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺍژﻩ »ﺩﻫﻚ« ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﻫﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻯ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﻰ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﺑﻴﺎﺑﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔــﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﻴــﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﺗــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﻃﻠﺐ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻭﺿــﺎﻉ ﻗﺪﺭﻯ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻫﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ
ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﻭﺳــﻮﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻣﻰ ﺑﻪﺳﻮﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻛــﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻯ
ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﻫﺪﻑ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﺳﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﺩﺳــﺖ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ .ﺗﺴــﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﺑﺎﻧﻜﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺍﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ.
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻣﻰ ﺑﻪﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻮﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻧﺶ ﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺷﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ
ﻧﻘﺪﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ
ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ .ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ
ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻫﻢ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺴﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ
ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ 25ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻱ ،ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩ 20ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻱ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺪ«.
ﺣﺴــﻦ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺑﺖ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩﻛﻤﺘﺮﺍﺯﻧﺮﺥﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﻃﻠﺒﻜﺎﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ»:ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ
ﻫﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ،ﻧﻪﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﺩﺭﻧﻴﻤﻪﺳﺎﻝﻭﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲﻛﻪﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺷﺶﻣﺎﻩﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩﻱ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳــﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ
ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ
25ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻱ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ،ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ
ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ «.ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻳﻨﻪ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﺑﺮﺳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﻳﻚ
ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ
ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺪﺭﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩﻫﺎ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻋﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﻧﺪ.
ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﻛﺎﺭ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻮﺵ ﻗﻨﺒﺮﻱ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺑﺤﺚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺳﺒﺐ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺻﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬــﺖ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺑﻪﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺷﻐﻠﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺷــﻐﻠﻲ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﻳﮋﮔــﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺷﻐﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﻫﺮﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺗﺎ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺷﻐﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ
ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺿﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺷﻐﻠﻰ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ،ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺷــﻐﻠﻰ،
ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﻨﺶ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪﺗﺎﺑﻪﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺴﻲﺑﻪﻣﺎﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥﺩﺭﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺑﺎﻋﺚﺷﺪﻩﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲﺑﻪﺁﻧﻬﺎﻭﺍﺭﺩﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺷﺪﻩﻛﻪﺍﺻﻼﺡﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﻛﺎﺭﺑﺪﻭﻥﻧﻈﺮﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﺁﻥﺑﺎﻳﺪﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺳــﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺬ
ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ
ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺷﺮﻁﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺳﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﺩﺍﺩ.ﺍﺯﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭﺍﺻﻼﺡﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﻛﺎﺭﺑﺪﻭﻥﻧﻈﺮﺷﺮﻛﺎﻯﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺍﺛﺮﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞ
ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻗﻠﺒﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺷﻜﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ،ﺩﺭﻏﻴﺮﺍﻳﻨﺼﻮﺭﺕﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪﺷﻮﻧﺪﻭﺳﭙﺲ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻘﺺ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
53
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺣﺎﺝ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺗﺎ ﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺟﺐﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺍﺻـﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧـﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ،ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ
ﺧﺒـﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﻳـﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻗﺒـﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺶ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳـﺎﻥ ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ،ﻣﻮﺿـﻊ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨـﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺳـﺮﻛﺎﺭ
ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷـﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻤﻜﺶﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺷـﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺣﺎﺝﺍﺳـﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ،ﻓﻌﺎﻝ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ 15ﺳـﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳـﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻻﺑﻪﻻﻱ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺿـﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘـﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؟
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﺸﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ
ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﭽﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 300ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻛﺒﻴﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ
ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺸــﺎﺕ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ
54
ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻠﺨﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ
ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ
ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛــﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻲ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧــﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺣﻘﺎﻕ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﺳﺎﻧﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﭼـﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓـﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ 1803ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﻪﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺷﺪ ،ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1884ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؟
ﻫﻢﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﺸــﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺳــﻴﺮ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺣﻘﺎﻕ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1285ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ
ﭼﺎپ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1307ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻭﺍﻟﻲ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻓﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﺳﺎﻝ 1307ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺣــﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﻟﻔﻆ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺟﺎﺭﻩ
ﺧﺪﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻨﺠﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺳﺴــﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﺸــﻐﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺁﻫﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺴﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺳﻨﮓ ﺑﻨﺎﻱ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
1315ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻧﺎﻣــﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1323ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍﻩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﻓﺘﺮﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1328ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﻪﻭﻫﻨﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ
ﺳﺎﻝ 1325ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻞ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﭘﻴﺸــﻪﻭﻫﻨﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﻪﻭﻫﻨﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺎﺩﻩﻭﺍﺣﺪﻩ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺣﻖ
ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﭘﻴﺸــﻪﻭﻫﻨﺮ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1336ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﻲ
ﻭ ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
1337ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺸــﺘﻤﻞ ﺑﺮ 69ﻣــﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺣــﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻞﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺰﺍﻳﺎﻱ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺳــﺎﻝ 1337ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌــﻲ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟــﻮژﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺷــﺪ .ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺕ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻴﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1362ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺣﺰﺏ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺛﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﮔﺴﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ 1369ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﮔﺮﺗﻪﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻱ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ،
ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ
ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ،ﺣﺰﺑﻲ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺳــﻴﺪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤــﻲ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻨﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ؟
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ؛ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺸــﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺎ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺫﻱﻧﻔﻊ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻟﺬﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺷﺸﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ؟
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺗﺸــﻜﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ،ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻲ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻳﻚ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸــﺎﺑﻬﺖ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻣﺰﺍﻳﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘــﻲ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﻪﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﻋﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻱ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ؟
ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ
ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺟﺰ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ
ﺣﻞ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ؟
ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺸــﺎﺕ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺸــﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺳــﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ
ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳــﺲ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻪﻋﻠﺖ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺷــﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺍﻓــﻖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺟﺪﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ 26
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ
ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻔﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣــﻲﺩﺍﺩ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭﻗﺖ ،ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ.
ﻧﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺷــﻔﺎﻑﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﻩﭘﺎﺳــﺦﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ:
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠــﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻪﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻋﺬﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﻪ
ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﻮﺩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ
ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ
ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻠﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ
ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﺗﺮﺍژﺩﻱ ﻏﻢﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻓﺮﺳــﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺲ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﮔﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺳــﺎﻝ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻼﺡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ،ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺗﻲ
ﺳﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎ
ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻠﺖ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﻇﻠﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺗﻀﻴﻴﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺳﻮءﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
55
ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺣﻼﻝ ﻣﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻫﻴﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎﻧــﻚ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫــﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺣﻜﺎﻳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ » ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ
ﻧﺎﺭﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺯﻧﺪﺭﺍﻥ«» ،ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺗﺨﻢﻣــﺮﻍ« ﻭ »ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤﺎﺕ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﻴﻤــﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎ«
ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻗﺮﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ »ﺣﻼﻝ« ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻴﺮﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ؛ »ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺷﺪ «.ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ
ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺣﻼﻝ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺷﮕﻔﺖﺯﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﭼﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﻓﻘﻂ
ﺑﻪﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻯ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ »ﺣﻼﻝ« ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﺘــﻜﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ
ﻭﺳــﻴﻌﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﮓ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻨﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻱ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻏﺬﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻼﻣﺖ ﺣﻼﻝ
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ
ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳــﻲ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺑﻊ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺣﻼﻝ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻏﻢﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﻣــﺮﻭﺭ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ
ﻏﺬﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻰ »ﺣــﻼﻝ« ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺣﻜﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ
632ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ،ﻣﻌــﺎﺩﻝ 17ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻛﻞ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻏﺬﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺭﻗﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﭘﺮ ﺁﺏ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺑﺎﺩﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻧﺒﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻲ ﺿﻴﻐﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ
ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺣﻼﻝ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ:
»ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺻﺪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﻎ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ 12 «.ﺁﺑﺎﻥ
ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﻊﺑﻨﺪ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻧﻈﺎﻡﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺯﮔﺮﻱ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻳﻜــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺠــﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ» :ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺣﻼﻝ« .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻏﺬﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺻــﺪﻭﺭ 800ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ
ﻏﺬﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺣﻼﻝ ،ﺧﺒﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﻪﺳﺮ ﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺭﻓﺘﻪ
ﺭﺧﺖ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺷﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺗﻠﺨﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴــﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﺛﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺣﻼﻝ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ
ﺍﺭﺷــﺪ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺳﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻲ ﻃﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋــﺪﻡ ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻒ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻏﺬﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻱ
ﺭﻗﻢ 500ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
ﻳﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻏﺬﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺠﻢ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ،ﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ 26ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ
ﺳﺎﻝ 2020ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺑﻪ 28ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻏﺬﺍﻫــﺎﻯ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﻟﻴﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ
ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﻏﺬﺍﻯ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻱ
ﺍﺗﺨــﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ
ﭘﺮﺁﺷــﻮﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﭙﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﺷــﻔﺘﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺐ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ؛
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ
ﻧﭙﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ:
ﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻴــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳــﻦ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺟﻬــﺎﻥ )ﺣﻼﻝ( ﺧﺒﺮ
ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺸــﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻳﻜــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫــﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻲﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻤﻠﮕﻲ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ
ﺑﻲﺍﻃﻼﻋــﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻳــﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻧــﺪﻙ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺷﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺑﻲﺍﻃﻼﻋﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻓﺰﺍﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻴﺖ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻛﺎﺯﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
56
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠــﻲ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺣــﻼﻝ ﺑــﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖﻫﺎ،
ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ
ﺣﻼﻝ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ
ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ،ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ،
ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ،ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻔﺮﻩ ﺣﻼﻝ
ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺷــﻔﺎﻑ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻭ
ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺭﻗﺒﺎ ﮔﻮﻱ
ﺳﺒﻘﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺟﺎﺭﻳﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ» :ﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻄﺢ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ «.ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ،ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻭﻧﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ
ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ «.ﺟﺎﺭﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺣﻼﻝ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ
ﺑﻪﺳﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻭﻣﺎﻟﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻱ
ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﺗــﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺪﻋﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ«.
www.mosalas.ir
ª¹ÀoÎ
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ« ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻴﺴﺖﻭﭘﻨﺠﻤﻴﻦﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺑﻠﻨﺪﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪﺩﺭﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«ﺍﺯﻫﻔﺘﻪﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺑﺮﭘﺮﺩﻩﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ.ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲﻓﺎﺭﻍﺍﺯﺍﺭﺯﺵﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻛﻴﻔﻲ،ﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﺵﺷﻮﺭﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱﺩﺭﻓﻀﺎﻱﺭﺧﻮﺕﺁﻟﻮﺩﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﺩﺭ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻱﻗﺒﻠﻲﺍﺵﺑﺮﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩﺷﻬﺮﻣﺤﻜﻤﻪﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱﺩﺭﺭﺩﻳﺎﺑﻲﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖﺑﺮﭘﺎﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.ﻗﺎﺿﻲﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﺟﻮﺍﻥﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﺍﺳﺖ.
57
1
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ«ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛــﻪ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﺵ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ
ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺭ
ﻭ ﺟﻠﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻃﻴﻔﻰ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ
ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﭘﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥﺳﺎﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺑﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺠﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳــﻰ )ﻛﻪ ﭘﺨﺶﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧــﺶ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺴــﺎﺏ
ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ( ﺍﺯ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺳــﻨﺖ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﮕﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺭﺧﻮﺕ ﺯﺩﻩ ﭼﻨﺪﻣﺎﻩ
ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺷــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺒﺸﻰ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﭼﻮﻥ »ﺳــﺮﺑﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ« ﻭ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﻭ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ
ﺗﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ »ﺣﻜﻢ« ﺣــﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺑﺎ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺵ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﮔﻰ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺛﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ
ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺚ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﺶ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻚﻟﺤﻈﺎﺗﻰ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻫﻤﺬﺍﺕﭘﻨــﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ
ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺑــﻮﺩﻩ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ »ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ«
ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﺎﺕ
ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﺟﻠﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻓﻀﺎﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ 95 .ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﺶ،
ﻳﻚ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻯ ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﻳﻪﻭﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺷﻬﺮﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻠﻌﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﻡ
ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﮔﻮﻧــﻪ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ» .ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑــﺎﻥ« ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﺛﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻣﺮﺗﻔﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷــﻠﻮﻏﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﺗﻮﻣﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻱ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺨﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺷﻠﻮﻏﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺯﺩﺣﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧﻲﺍﺵ ،ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ
ﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﺤﻞ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻏﺎﻳﺐ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻣﻬــﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻯ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺣﺘﻰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺻﻞ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﺩﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺁﺧﺮ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﮔﻮﻳﻰ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﺮﺋﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺴﻠﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺎﺩﻩ ﺣﻴﺜﻴــﺖ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺧﻴﺰﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﺑﻪﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﺪ .ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻫﺶ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺑﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻪﺍﺵ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ
ﻭ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﻮﻳﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ.
2
3
ﻋﻜﺲ :ﺑﺎﺑﻚ ﺑﺮﺯﻭﻳﻪ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﺑﺨﺸﺶ ﺷﺎﻛﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎﺑﻚ ﻏﻔﻮﺭﻱﺁﺫﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻨﺖ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛــﺮﺍﻥ ﻫــﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ »ﻗﻴﺼﺮ« ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻓﺖ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺱ
ﻛﻴﻔــﻰ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﺎﺧﺮ ،ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
1
58
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺴــﺎﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻨﺖ
ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻰ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﺱ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﺸﺪﻥ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ
ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻪﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﻭﺯﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﮕﺮ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﺝ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﻨﺪ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ
4
2
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ«ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻜﺲ :ﺭﺿﺎ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻱ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮﻱ ﻣﻔﺼﻞ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺵ
ﻗﻴﺼﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻠﻚ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺝﭘﻮﺭ -ﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺧﺎﻧﻲ
ﺳـﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺷﻌﺮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ،ﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴـﺎﺯ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﺶ
ﻣﺘﻌـﺪﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ -ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦﻫﺎﺳـﺖ -ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻲ ،ﻟﺤﻈﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﻛﺸـﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻭ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴـﺎﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻴﺴـﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻔﺖ -ﻳﺎ ﺑﻴﺴـﺖ ﻭ
ﻫﺸﺖ -ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻫﻨﺖ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ
ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺶ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺵ ﻧﺸﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺫﺍﺕﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ...
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦﻓﻴﻠﻢﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺿﻤﻦ
ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﺵ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﺍﻳﺴﺘﺪ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲﺍﺯﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲﺍﺳﺖ-ﻭﺍﻳﻦﻫﻤﺎﻥﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﻲﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﺵ ،ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺶ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﺶ ،ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺶ ،ﺗﻢ ﻭ ﻟﺤﻨﺶ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ -ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ )ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ
ﻣﺜﻼ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻳﺎ ﺣﻜﻢ( ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﮕﺮﻳﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺳﺮﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺮﻓﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻲﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ )ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻧﺮﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ( ،ﺩﺍﺳـﺘﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﺭﺍﺳـﺖ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ )ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﻕ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ،
ﺩﺍﺳـﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ( ﻭ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﺳﺘﺪ.
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻟﺤﻦ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﺨﺺﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﺴﺘﻮﻱ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ )ﻓﻴﻠﻢ( ﺑﺎ ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻲ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻧﻲ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺑﻪﺭﻭﺯﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑـﺪﻭﻥ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﮔﻮﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭼـﻮﻥ »ﺣﻜﻢ« ﻭ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ«
ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺸﻢ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﻬﻮﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ
ﻭ ﺧﺸﻢ ﻭ ﺯﺧﻢ ﺑﺮﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻤﻲ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮﻛﺲ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺿﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﺮﻳﻨﻲ ﻋﺴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺸﻘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻴﺎﻭﺵﻭﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻜﻤﻪ
ﺁﺗﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﮔﺬﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﺮﻳﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺒﺮﺋﻪ ،ﺧﻮﺷﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﺯﺧﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺩﺵ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺴـﺘﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺣﺮﻑ ﺑﺰﻧﻴﻢ ،ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ
ﺩﻭﺳـﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﺸـﻪﺍﺵ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﭘـﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﺭﺍﻡﺗﺮ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴـﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ ﺳـﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ )ﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺝﭘﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ( ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﮔﻮﻳﺪ.
59
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ .ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ،ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺸـﺎﺵ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺳـﻨﺪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ« ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻫﻦ
ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺳـﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ .ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ ﺑﭙﺮﺳﻢ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷـﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺷﻮﻕ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﺎﻣﻴﺪ؟
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍﺿﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺟﻪ
ﺑﺸﺎﺵ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺴــﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳــﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺷــﺒﺎﻭﻳﺰ
ﻓﻮﺕ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺑﻄﻲ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﺣﻤــﺪﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ،
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺯﻭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ
ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﻡ ﻫﺮ ﻧــﻮﻉ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻧﻪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻼﻣﺘﻲ ﻣــﻦ -ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ -ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺧﺮﺝ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ...ﻣــﻦ ﺻﺮﻳﺤﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ
ﻛــﻪ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜــﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺷــﺒﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺳــﻴﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺳــﻔﻴﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺗﻢ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻡ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻳﺪ؟
ﺗﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻲ .ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﺑــﻲ ﺗﻮﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻱ .ﺫﻫﻨﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻤﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺭﻳﺰﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺳــﻲﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻧﻲ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺻﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺼﺖ،
ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 57ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻢ ﻛﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺭﺷﺪ
ﻛﻨﻲ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺟﻮﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﻮﺍﻳﺰ ﻓﻜﺮ -ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ،
ﺷــﻴﻤﻲ ،ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻴﺎﺕ -ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﻬﻞ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻴﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻓﺮﺍﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺷﺘﮕﻲﻫﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻤﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳـﺎﻟﻪ ،ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻧﻲ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﺴـﻮﺱ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﭼـﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ
ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴـﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﭼـﻮﻥ» ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺷـﻤﺎ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻋﻜــﺲ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺮﺟﻬﺖ ....ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻌﻼ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺑﻪﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻢ ،ﻧــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻛﻨﻲ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ.
ﺁﻗـﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳـﻲ ،ﺁﺩﻡ ﻭﻗﺘـﻲ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑـﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨـﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷـﻨﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﭼﻴـﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻓﻴﻠـﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘـﺎﻝ ﺍﺳـﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ .ﻭﻟﻲ
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴـﺎﺯﻱ ﭼـﻮﻥ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺴـﺖﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻤﻴﻦ
ﻳﺎ ﺑﻴﺴﺖﻭﻫﺸـﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ ﺳـﺮﺍﻍ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘـﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ
ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﺍﻗﺘﺼـﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ...ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ -ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﻳﺎ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴـﺎﺯ ﺭﺍ ﻗﻠﻘﻠﻚ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ
60
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻝ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ؟
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ،ﺳﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲﺍﺵ
»ﻣﻮﻭﻱ ﻛﻢ« ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﺷــﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻱ ﻣﺎﺷــﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ،ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ
ﺗــﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺍﻓﻴﻚ .ﺧﺐ ،ﺗﻨﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﺎﺷــﻴﻦ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻨﻪ ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺗﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟــﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﺳــﻲﻭﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻤﺘﺮﻱ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺷــﻴﻦ ﭼﺮﺍﻍ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻳﺎ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺷﻴﺸﻪ ﺟﻠﻮ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺗﻮﻱ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ،ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺩﻓﺮﻣﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﻟﻨﺰ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺗﻜﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻢ ﺗﻮﻱ ﻣﺎﺷــﻴﻦ ،ﺑﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﻳﻚ ﻋﻜﺲ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻝ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺧﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﺗﻴﻮ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﻣﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻲﺭﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﻛـﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺷـﺪﻩ .ﺍﮔـﺮ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷـﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺑـﺰﺍﺭ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺎﺷـﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ
ﺧـﻮﺩﺵ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻤـﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗـﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳـﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺭﻭﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﺛﺮ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻮﺍﻥﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻴﺴـﺖﻭﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﻣﺴـﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﻱ
ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﺗﺎﺑﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳـﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳـﺖ -ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ Freshﺷـﺪﻩ -ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ
ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻢ ﺁﻳﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻱ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﺎ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ -ﻣﺜﻼ -ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻧﻪ ،ﻧﻪ .ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻓﺮﻣﺖ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺗﻮﻣﺒﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﻡ .ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺩﻡ،
ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻬﺮ ،ﭘﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺶ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻦ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻦ ﺳـﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺷـﻬﺮ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻟﺨﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ .ﺁﻥ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﺑـﻂ ،ﺁﻥ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ،
ﺯﺧﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻣـﺮﻭﺯﻱ ....ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺮﺷﻲ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻦ ﻣﺜﻼ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﻡ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ،ﺳــﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺳﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﺍﺳــﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻡ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺳﻪ ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺷﺮﻳﻚ« ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺖ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻱ -ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯﺵ ﺗﺸﻜﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ -ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺳﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺷــﺮﻳﻚ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺩ ﺷﺪ -ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺧﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﺑﻬﺶ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻓﻜﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻜﻦ -ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﮕﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻱ -ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ
ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺒﺮﻡ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺳـﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﺑﭙﺮﺳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﺿﻲ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷـﻴﺪ ،ﻭﻟـﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴـﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﺠـﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ .ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺻﺤﺒـﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫـﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸـﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷـﺘﻪﺍﻳﺪ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸـﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺁﻣﺪ ،ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻤﺎ؟
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔــﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻄﻒ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻬﻢ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺍﺻﻼ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺠﺎﻳﺶ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻴﺴﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺠﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻱ ،ﻳﻚ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺩﺍﻧﺎ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻠﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻛﺠﺎﻳﺶ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺠﺎﻳﺶ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ،ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫـﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷـﺪﺕ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻣﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﺍﻳﺸـﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴـﺎﺯﻱ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺴـﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ
ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺳـﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺠﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻔـﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻧﻴـﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺘﻔـﺎﻭﺕ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺷﺮﻳﻚ« ﻗﺒﻼ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﻢ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻣﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻱ )ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻲ( .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ.
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ
ﻗﻬﺮﻣـﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﻓﻘـﻂ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻪﺗﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻪﺷﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻭ ﺯﺧﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺎ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺳـﺖ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻮﻳـﺪ )ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﺗﻦ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺯﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻧﺶ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ( ﻳﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ )ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺎﻛﺴﻲ( ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺗﻠﺦ؟
ﻳﻚ ﺟﺸﻦ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻡ )ﺑﺎ
ﺷﻮﺧﻲ ﻭ ﺧﻨﺪﻩ(؛ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ،ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻢ.
ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻧـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮ ﭘﻮﻻﺩ )ﺍﻣﻴﺮ(
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﭘﺎﻙ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻟﻜﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻋﺸـﻘﺶ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ،ﭘﺎﻛﺶ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﺘﻲ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺑﺪﺵ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺟﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺒﺎﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﺎﻥ ﺷﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﻡ) .ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺝﭘﻮﺭ( ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻢ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﻫﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﻫﻢ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﻣﻦ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷـﻨﻮﻳﻢ ﻛـﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺱ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺕ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺪ )ﺑﺎﺧﻨﺪﻩ( ﻣﺜﻞ ﻓﺸــﻦ ) .(Fashionﺣﺎﻻ ﺗﻮ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻥ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺗﻮ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺱ
ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺱﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﺴـﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻲ .ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭﺵ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ
ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺱﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻗﺒﻴﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﮔﺎﻩ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻛﻲ
ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺵ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﺍﻱﺗﺮ،
ﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻱﺗﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻱ! ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ؟
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﺮﺳـﻮﻡ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺱﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ
ﻏﻴﺮﺕ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻓﺮﺿﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﺯﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺣﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻬﺶ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ
ﺟﺪﺍ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖﺗﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺣﺴﺎﺩﺕ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﺶ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ...
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ؟
ﻳﺎ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻳـﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺑـﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠـﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻱﺗﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻨﺪ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮ
ﭘﻮﻻﺩ ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮﻭﻱ ﺑﭙﺮﺳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ
ﭼﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻢ ﺯﺧﻢ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻭﺷﻲ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻗﺒﻴﻠﻪﺍﻱ.
ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﻠﻜﻲ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ )ﻣﻲﺧﻨﺪﺩ( ﻗﻴﺼﺮ،
ﻛﻠﻚ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ!
ﺧـﺐ ،ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑـﺎﻥ« ﻫﻢ ﺩﻗﻴﻘـﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳـﺶ ﺁﺧﺮﻱ ،ﻣﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ
ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ .ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ -ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﺘـﺎﻥ -ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳـﺮﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺷـﺒﻴﻪ ﻗﻴﺼﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ )ﭼﺎﻗﻮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺼﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ( ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻳﻚ
ﺁﺩﻡ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺁﺩﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ،
ﺍﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺭ
ﻣﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺷﺼﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻭ ﺣﺎﺩﺙ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻪﻫﺮ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﻣﻴــﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺝ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ،ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ ،ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﭽﻪﺍﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫــﻢ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻗﻴﺼﺮ ﺑﻬﺶ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺯﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﭼﻨــﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ،
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﺵ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺟﻬﺖ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﺸــﺪ ،ﻳﻚ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺗﺶ ﺷﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻋـﺎﻡ ،ﺯﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻭﺳـﺎﻣﺎﻥ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘـﻦ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻓﻴﻠـﻢ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺗﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻋﺎﺷـﻘﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺟﻲ ﺳﺮ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻲﺳﺮﻭﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺜﻞ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ؟
ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺮﺳﺪﺱ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ،ﺣﻜﻢ....ﺩﺭﻫﻤﻪﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺁﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﻣﻲﻛﻨﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺖ؟ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺳﺖ ،ﻳﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺎﻥ؟
ﺧﺐ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻃﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻗﺘﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ ،ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﺴﺎﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﺎﻻ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻭ
ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺩﻟﻴﻠﺶ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺠﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﭼﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱ ،ﻛﻲ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺳـﺎﻋﺖﻭﻧﻴﻤﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﻳـﻢ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳـﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻼﻗـﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑـﺎ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ
ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴـﻢ ﺗﻠﺦ ﻭ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺴﺎﺭﮔﺴـﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴـﻢ -ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ -ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻗﺒﻠﻲﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴـﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ
ﺁﻭﺭﻡ .ﻧﻪ ،ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻓﻜـﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ
ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ
ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻪ
ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﮔﺮ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻣﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻬــﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺟﻬﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺣﻖ
ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺟﺰ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ .ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺴﺎﻣﺤﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﻧﮓﺁﻣﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ
)ﺭﻧﮓ ﺁﻣﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ
ﺩﻫﺪ( ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻲ ،ﺁﺩﻡ ﺯﺧﻤﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺯﺧﻢ ﺗﻦ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮگ ﻭﻝ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ؛
ﮔﺮگ ﻭﻝ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺮگ ﺗﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﺟﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻪ ﺩﻟﺶ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺜﻼ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﻣﻦ )ﻛﻪ ﻫﻲ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻴﺼﺮ ﻳﺎ
61
ﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺳﺮﺏ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥﻣﺎﺭ( ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﻬﻮﻟﺖ
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻳﺶ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺧﻼﺹ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ؛ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻮﺭ
ﺯﺭﻩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺵ
ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻭﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺳﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﺍﺵ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺩﻭﺳــﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻟﺶ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺳﺮﺵ ﻛﻼﻩ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ.
ﺑﻪﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻬﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻔﺮﻩ ﻧﺮﻭﺩ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻧﺮﻭﺩ ،ﺍﺻﻞ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺁﺩﻣﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ:
»ﺣﺴﻮﺩﻡ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ« ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺣﺴــﺎﺩﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ؛ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﻴﺪﻥ ﺯﺧﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻪ ،ﺯﺧﻢ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺯﺷﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﻫﻤﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺯﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ.
ﺧـﺐ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳـﻢ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺷـﺒﺎﻫﺘﺶ ﺑﻪ
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﮔﺬﺷـﺘﻪﺗﺎﻥ ،ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﺖ؛ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺵ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻳﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺁﺭﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻢ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ
ﺑﻪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﭙﻮﺷﺎﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺮﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴـﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻲﺣﻮﺻﻠـﻪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻜﺲﺍﻟﻌﻤـﻞ ﺑـﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﻜـﺮﺩ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫـﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻗﺼﻪﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳـﻤﺖ
ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳـﺖ ﻧﻮﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻗﺼﻪﺗﺮ ﻛـﻪ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ
ﻳﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷـﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮓ ﺑﻲﺣﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﻧﻤﻲﭼﺴﺒﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺼﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺩﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺯﺧﻢ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻢ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺻﻼ ﺯﺧﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺯﺧﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﺩﻋﻮﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺷﻮﺧﻲ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺯﺧﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼﻬﻞ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑـﺎ ﺯﺧﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺳـﺮﻭﻛﺎﺭ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ...
ﺑﻪﻫﺮﺟﻬﺖﺍﻳﻦﺍﺳﺖﺩﻳﮕﺮ.ﺍﻳﻦﺭﺳﻢﺍﻟﺨﻂﻣﻦﺍﺳﺖ.ﺣﺎﻻﺍﻳﻦﻓﻘﻂﻳﻚ
ﺭﺳﻢﺍﻟﺨﻂﺍﺳﺖ،ﻳﺎﺁﻳﺎﺍﻳﻦﺭﺳﻢﺍﻟﺨﻂﺷﻌﺮﻱﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺍﺯﺯﺧﻢﻣﻦﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖﻛﻪﻧﺸﺎﻥﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﻣﺪﺕﭼﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ.
ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ ،ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ ،ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻨﺠﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻦ ،ﻳﺎ ﻗﺼﻪﻧﻮﻳﺴﻲ
ﻣﻦ ،ﻳﺎ ﺭﻣﺎﻥﻧﻮﻳﺴﻲ ﻣﻦ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺿﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﺏ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻮ ﭼﺮﺧﻴﺪﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻳﺎ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻭ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﺪﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺷﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ! ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ .ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺟﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﺍﻡ
ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻳﺴﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﻠﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ،ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ،ﻛﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﻠﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ.
ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺷــﺤﺎﻟﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﺴﺮﻫﺎﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲﺑﺮﺍﻱﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥﺩﺍﺩﻥﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ
ﺳﻮﺍﻟﻲﻫﻢﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱﺯﻥﺍﻳﻦﻓﻴﻠﻢﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﻢ.
ﻣﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮ ﺭﻭ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻢ .ﺗﻮ ﻓﻤﻨﻴﺴﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ.
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺴـﺘﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳـﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ...
62
)ﻗﻄﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ( ﻛﻲ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ؟ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺯﻥ ﺣﺮﻑ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺯﻧﺪ؟
ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﻡ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺼﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻗﺼﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺯﻧﺪﮔــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﺮﻭﻫﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؟ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺰﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؟ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؟ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﻨﻲ
ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ،ﺟﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺑﺘﺮﺍﺷــﻢ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ« ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻈﺎﻫﺮﺍﺕ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺴــﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ
ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﺠﻪ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ.
ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﺮﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻮ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻳﻜﺠﻮﺭ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥﺩﻫﻲ ،ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺩ ﮔﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﮔﻢ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ .ﺁﻥ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺳﺖﺳﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺯﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ
ﺁﺳﺎﻥ ﻟﻮ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻱ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ.
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻧﻴﺴـﺘﻨﺪ .ﻳﻜﻲﺷـﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻛـﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﭘﺮﻳﺸـﺎﻥ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺷـﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ .ﺯﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ
ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ.
ﻋﺎﺷــﻖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻛﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻜﺎﺭﻱﺍﺵ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ...
ﺩﺭﺩﺳــﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭ
ﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺍﺵ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺸﻘﺶ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﻭ ﺗﺎ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﺗﻮﻱ
ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻪ ﻳﺎﺩﻣﻪ« ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺗﻮﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﺎ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ.
ﭼﻴﺰﻱﻛﻪﻓﻴﻠﻢﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪﻳﻚﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻱﻭﻳﻚﭼﻴﺰﻭﺳﻴﻊﺗﺮﻱﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻫﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲﺗﺎﻥ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻡ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻡ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻧﮓﺁﻣﻴﺰﻱ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺯﺧﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﻫﺴــﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻫﺮﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮﻱ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﻟﺤــﻦ ﻭ ﻟﻬﺠﻪﺍﺵ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍﺿﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ؟
ﻧﻪ ،ﻧﺨﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷﺶ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺴـﺘﻘﻞ ﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﺑـﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺴﺖﻭﺍﻧﺪﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﺻﻼ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﭘﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺟﻮﺭﻱ ﺣﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺩﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﻪ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ،ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﺠﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﺗﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﺪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ
ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ )ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﻡ
ﺧﻮﺩﺳﺘﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ( ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﻧﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ ،ﺗﺸـﺨﺼﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺎﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻘﺸﺶ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﺒﺮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ .ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﻣﺜﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻳﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﻴﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻋﺠﺐ
ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
3
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺵ ﺍﺯ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ«ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻣﺮﻭﺗﻲ
ﺗﻴﺘــﺮﺍژ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺮﻱ ،ﺟﺪﻭﻝ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ
ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﻳﻚ ﭘﻞ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ .ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩ
ﺗﻴﺘﺮﺍژﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻮﺷﻪ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﺎﺩﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﺎﻻ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﺮﺗﺮﺩﺩ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﻭﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻘﺶ
ﺑﺒﻨﺪﺩ؛ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«.
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ )ﭘﻮﻻﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ( ﺑﻪ ﮔﻠﻔﺮﻭﺷــﻲ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ
ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮔﻞ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ.
ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺷﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺩﻱ ﭘﻮﻻﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﮔﻠﻔﺮﻭﺷﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺗﻠﺨﻲ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎﻟﻲ ﭘﻮﻻﺩ ﺭﺍ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺳــﺮﻭﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﻲ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ .ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ
ﺧﺸﻦ ﻭ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﺼﺮﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻲ
ﻭ ﺧﻔﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺑﺸﻜﻦﺯﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻭﺗﻦ ﺗﻜﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺩﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻮﻻﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﻃﻮﻟﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺸﺪ .ﺭﻓﻴﻘﻲ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﻲ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﺳــﭙﻴﺪ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺭﻓﻴﻖ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻗﺎﻳﻖ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ،
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻠﻮﻍ ﻭ ﺩﻟﮕﻴﺮ .ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺧﺎﻛﺴﺘﺮﻱ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺒﻮﻩ ﺍﺗﻮﻣﺒﻴﻞﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺮﺩﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻧﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺵ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﻻ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﻭ ﻛﻼﻥﻧﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻮﻻﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﻲ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺭﻓﻴﻖ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲﺍﺵ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﺮﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺗﻮﻣﺒﻴﻞ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﺾ ﺭﻭﻏﻨﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺳــﻴﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺻﺶ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻮﻻﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻓﻴﻖ
ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺧﻮﺷــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﺩ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺵ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎﻝ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﮔﻮﻳﺶ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺩ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ» :ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺴــﺮﻩ ﺣﺮﻓﺶ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻬﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻏﻴــﺮﺕ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺱﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻪ .ﻣﺎ
ﭼﻴﻜﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﺍﻓﺘﻴﻢ؟« ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺭﺥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺥ ﺣﺮﻓﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻧﺴﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ،ﭘﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﻮﻻﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﺎﺩﺭ ،ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﻴﺪﻳﻢ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳــﺮﺧﻮﺵ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﺨﺖ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ .ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﻭﺱ ﻗﺒﻼ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﺯﻥﺩﺍﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ،
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺣﺎﻣﻠﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻘﻂ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ.
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺨﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺁﺷــﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺸﻒ
ﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺭﺯﻭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻛﺜﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻫﻢ
ﺭﻳﺨﺘﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻠﻮﻍ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻭﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎ ،ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻲ
ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻓﺼﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻥ ﻋﺒﺪ) ،ﺷﻘﺎﻳﻖ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻲ(،
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﺮﻛﻪﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺯﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻦ
ﻣﺸﺮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ؛ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻓﺮﻳــﺎﺩ ﺯﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺣــﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻧﺶ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻘــﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ )ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻏﺮﺍﻕﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺟﻤﻊ
ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒــﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ...ﺩﺍﻣﺎﺩ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﺶ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ؛ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯ ﺑــﺮ ﺯﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭ) ،ﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺯﻧــﺪﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﻭﺗــﻦ ،ﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻛﺮﻳﻤــﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻳﺪ ،ﻛﻪ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﺧﻴﺎﻧــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺗﻢ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻣﻮﻛﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺳــﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺭﻓﺎﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻞ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﺮﻭﺗﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ »ﺣﻜﻢ« ﻭ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ«
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﻃﻮﺳﻲ ،ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻧﻮﺁﺭ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ ،ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻓﺎﻗﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ!
ﻣﺮﺩ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﻦﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻫﺮﻭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺣﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴــﻢ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ
ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺒــﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﭘﻲﺑﺒﺮﻳﻢ .ﺍﻭ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺴــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺁﺷــﻨﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻲﻣﺮﺍﻣﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﻠﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲﺍﺵ ﻓﺮﻭ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ؛ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺍﺵ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﺯﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻓﻼﺵﺑﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺭﻓﻴﻖ ﺧﺎﺋﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺰﻟﺶ ﻭ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱﺍﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﻫﺎﻱ
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩﻩ .ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺗﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﺸﻦ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺩﻧﺎﻙ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ،ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫــﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻭﺗﻦ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﺩﺭﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻛﺪ ،ﺧﺸﻢ ﻭ ﻋﺼﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺯﺧﻢ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻏﻮﺵ ﻣﺮگ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻲﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻓﺸــﺎﺭ )ﻋﺒﺪ( ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺴﻴﺮﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﺎ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ،ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ )ﭘــﻮﻻﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ( ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﺶ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﻮﻱ ﺫﻭﻕ
ﻧﻤﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻼﻗﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻗﺎﻳﻖ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺍﻓﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻫﺎ ،ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺘــﻢ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻝ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ.
ﺟﺎﻟــﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳــﻲ ﻣﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻘﻴــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺧﺎﻛﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﺯﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﻣﺮﺩ ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﺎﻧﻪﺍﺵ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﻴﭗ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻨﻲ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻋﺒﺪ )ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻓﺸــﺎﺭ( ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگ ﻭ ﻟﺤﻨﺶ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺳﻮء ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻱ
ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﻓﻌﻪﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ
ﺷﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻜﺶ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺼﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﺏ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ
ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ،
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﺰ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺩﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻳﺪ .ﺩﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﻥ
ﺷــﻮﻫﺮﺵ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻜﺚ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨــﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻱ
ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﻳﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺎ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ
ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻣﻲ ﺧﻮﺵ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻱ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻜﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﺳﺎﻳﻪﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﻮﻣﺒﻴﻠﺶ
ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣــﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ؛ ﻋﻜﺲ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺎﻟــﻮگ ﻋﺒﺪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ» :ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ ﺑﭽﻪ!«
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺩﺭ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﺨﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻠﺨﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﻫﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺲ ﻳﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻮﺗﻴﻒ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺼﺮﻱ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ )ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺩﻛﻮﭘﺎژ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭﻱ( ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﺧﺎﻛﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﺗﺒﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﻣﺘﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ.
ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺟﺪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺧــﻮﺏ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻭ
ﺍﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﮔﻮﻳﻲ ،ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣــﻮﻥ ﻫﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﻀﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪﺩﺭﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«)ﺑﺎﺫﻛﺮﺍﻳﻦﻧﻜﺘﻪﻛﻪ»ﺣﻜﻢ«ﺗﻚﺳﻜﺎﻧﺲﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﻲﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ(ﺍﻳﻦﻗﻮﻝﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭﺳﺖﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ.
63
4
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ«ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ » ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻣﻨﺠﻤﺪ
ﻣﻬﺮﺯﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ
ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪ؟
ﺭﻓﺎﻗﺖ ،ﻏﻴﺮﺕ ،ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺱ ،ﭼﺎﻗﻮ...؟ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻧﻲ
ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺟﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛
ﻋﻜﺲ .ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻜﺲ ،ﻟﺰﻭﻣﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؛ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺲ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲﺍﺵ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ )ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ( ﺭﻗﻢ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺲ
ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺩﭘﺎﻱ ﮔﺮگ؛ ﺁﻧﺠــﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺑﻠﻮﻱ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﺟﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺗﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻨﺶ ﻭ ﺷــﻢ
ﺧﺎﺭﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻭ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﺶ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺚ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻳﺎﺩﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺰﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻻ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﻟﺤﻈﺎﺕ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ
ﻫﻢ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻤﺶ ﺩﻫﻢ .ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻫﺎ ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻠﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﺟﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲ؛
ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺭﺑﻂ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭﻱ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻜﺲﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻜﺲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﻟﺤﻈﺎﺕ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩﻣﺪﺕ
ﺭﻳﺘﻤﻴﻚ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻮﺷــﻪ ﺫﻫﻦﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﻀﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫــﺎﻱ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻣــﻲ ﻭ ﺿﺮﺑﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺒﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﮔﻮﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺘﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﺁﻳﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺟﺰء ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺁﻓﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ
ﻣﻲﺁﻳــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻤﺘﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻗﻴﺼــﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻓﺎﺕ
64
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻧﺒــﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﺎﺧﺮﺗﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻧــﮕﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﺨﺺ ﻭ ﻫﻮﻳﺘﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﻼ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻝ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﻫﻴﺪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻗﻲﺗﺮ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻧﻜﻮﻳﻲ )ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻓﺮﻭﺗﻦ( ﺍﺯ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺘﻦ )ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺭﺍﺯ
ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﺶ ﺍﺳــﺖ( ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺣﺪﺱ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻴﻢ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﺯﻭﺩﻱ ﺩﺭﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼ
ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﻭﺭﺷﻜﺴﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ
ﻭ ﺷﺮﻳﻜﺶ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺳــﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﭘﺲ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮ ﺳﻤﭙﺎﺗﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻧﺘﻲﺳﻤﭙﺎﺗﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭﺍﻣﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻟﺒﺎﺱﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻬﺪ
ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻱ 30ﻭ 40ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺞ ﺍﺗﺎﻗﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻫﺮﻭﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺑﭽﻪﺍﺵ ﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻳﺪ .ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﭼﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺲ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺑﺮ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ
ﻣﺮﺩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺯﺧﻢﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻓﺮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻫﻢ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺳﻪ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯﺷﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ )ﺁﺑﺪﺍﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ،
ﺭﺍﻫﺮﻭﻱ ﭘﺎﺳﺎژ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻨﺰﻝ( ﻭﺍﺟﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺮﺩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﺎ
ﻗﺼﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩﻣﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﺯﺩ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻳﺴﺘﻨﺶ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﭘﺴﺮﺵ 10ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺭﻭﺡ ﻭ ﻋﺎﻃﻔﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺭﻭ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻧﻜﻮﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻳﻜﺶ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻛﻪ ﻻﺑﺪ
ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺿﺎﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ .ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻛﻢ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﮕﻮﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺭﻳﺘﻢ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺳﺮﻭﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻻﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺁﻥ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻳﺪﻥ ﻋﺮﻭﺱ ﻭﺳﻂ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺘﻚﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﻫﻲ
ﺣﻔﺮﻩ ﮔﺎﺭﺍژ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻋﺮﻭﺳــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻲ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﺩ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﺸــﺪ .ﻗﺒﻼ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪﻭﻓﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ؛ ﺍﺳﺐﺳﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺭﺩ ﭘﺎﻱ ﮔﺮگ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟ ﺑﻲﺟﻬﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻋﺒﺪ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺘﻚ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺶ ،ﺳﺨﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻭ ﻧﺠﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ
ﻋﺮﻭﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺗﺎﻻﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﺷﮕﻔﺖﺯﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻏﻴﺮﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵﺑ ُﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺭﺟﺰﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﭼﻪ ﺻﻴﻐﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻧﺰﺩ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻲﻧﺎﻣﻮﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﺘﻚ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﺑﻲﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺭﺍﻫﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ؟ ﭘﺲ ﭼﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮ ﻧﺸــﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﺒﺪ ﭼﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺶ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮ
ﻧﺸﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻗﺎﻧﻊﺷﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﺲ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻲﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺣﺖ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﻉ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﺎﺩ
ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣــﺎﻻ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﺰﺑﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻒ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺩﻭﭘﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﺳــﻂ ﺩﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﻣﻲﮔﺴﻠﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻀــﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺩﻭﭘﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ
ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻜﻮﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ؛ ﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻓﺖ ﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﺟﺎ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﺪﺱ ﺯﺩ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺩﺭﺍﻣﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺍﻡﺳﺎﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺘﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﻦ ﭘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺩﺭﺍﻣﺎﺗﻴﻚ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪ؟
5
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ«ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﺩﺭﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻩ ،ﺗﻮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺕ ﻧﻴﺎﺭ!
ﺷﺎﭘﻮﺭ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﻲ
ﺩﺍﮔﻼﺱ ﺳــﻴﺮﻙ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﻃﻼﻳﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻔــﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻠﻮﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﻭ
ﺗﺮﺍژﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﺍژﺩﻱ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﻣﻲﻣﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻠﻮﺩﺭﺍﻡ ،ﻣﻲﻣﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ
ﻫﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻮﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ .ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻫﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺨﻮﺭﺩ .ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺳﻲ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ )ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﻮﺩﺕ( ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺏ ﻭ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺑﺰﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﻭﺯﻱ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺑﺮﺳﻲ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻪ ﺩﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻲ «.ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺳﻴﺮﻙ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻠﻮﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﻭ
ﺗﺮﺍژﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ» ،ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﻮﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻧﺸــﺪﻥ ﺁﺩﻡﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻐﺎﻛﻲ ﺑﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺩﻭﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻐﺎﻙ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﺭﻃﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻡ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺭﻃﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﻩ،
ﺁﻫﺴــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﺮﺍﺷﺪ .ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺗﺮﺱﺁﻭﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﺸﻤﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺩﺭﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻩ ،ﺗﻮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺕ ﻧﻴﺎﺭ«
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺧﻨﺪﻩ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﭼﺸﻢ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﺧﻤﻲ
ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺯﺧﻤﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺯﺧﻤﺶ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﺧﻤﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ،ﺟﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﻱ
ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ،ﭼﺸﻢ ﺗﻮﻱ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﻳﺎﺩﺵ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﺒﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻋﻜﺲ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﺗﻮﻣﺒﻴﻞ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ» :ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﺑﭽﻪ «.ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺁﺩﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮ ﺟﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﻨﺸﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﺩﻣﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ .ﺍﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺶ ﻛﻨﺪ؛ »ﻣﻨﻮ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻧﻜﻦ«.ﺣﺒﻴﺐﻣﺎﻝﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ.ﺑﺮﺍﻱﻫﻤﻴﻦﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺣﻀﻮﺭﺵ
ﺍﻳﻨﻘﺪﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﻋﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ »ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ« ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛ »ﻫﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻦ ﻛُﺸــﺘﻲ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻦ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛُﺸﺘﻲ؟« ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺍﻭ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺭﻓﻴﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﮔﻠﻴﻤﺶ ﺩﺭﺍﺯ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻫﺸــﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻛﺎﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭼﺮﻙﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﺳﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ »ﮔﻮﺯﻥﻫﺎ« ﻫﻢ
ﻫﺴــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ »ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ« ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ؟ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻋﺸﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ »ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺧﻮﺍﻡ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﻭﺩﺭﻭﺍﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻩ .ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻪ ﺍﮔﻪ ﺑﺮﻩ ،ﻛﻠﻚ ﺯﺩﻩ «.ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺍﮔﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻮ،
ﻣﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺸــﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ؟ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻋﺸﻖ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻥ ،ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﺮﺯ
ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎ ﺧﻄﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ »ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻪ ﺭﻭ ،ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﻢ« ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﺳﺘﺪ .ﺍﺑﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﭼﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺖﭘﺮ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ.
ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻪ ،ﺩﺳﺖﻛﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﺴﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ
ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺑﺮﻧﮕﺮﺩﺩ »ﻣﻲﺭﻡ ﻳﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﻢ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﺵ ﻧﻜﻨﻢ«
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﻣﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺭﻩ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺧﻄﺎ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ،ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻣﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﺯﺍ
ﻭ ﻧﺴــﺨﻪ ﺍﻟﻤﺜﻨﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺯﻧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺰﻩﻣﺰﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﻗﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻮﺭﻩﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﺵ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﻟﺸﻮﺭﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ
ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻳﺰﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺩﻝ
ﻭ ﺯﻭﺩﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻴﻎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺳﭙﺎﺭﺩ .ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻜﺲﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﺶ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺮگ ﺷﻮﻫﺮﺵ؛ ﺧﻮﻧﺴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ.
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺩﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻠﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ
ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺼﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ،ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﺎﻥ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ» .ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﻮ ﻭﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ.
ﻣﺜﻪ ﻛﺮﺑﺎﺱ ﭘﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻡ« .ﺑﻲﺍﻏﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﻓﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮﮔﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ »ﺩﺷﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ« .ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺎﻣﻠﻲ
ﺍﺯﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲﺑﺒﻴﻨﻢ.ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﺩﻟﻢﺧﻮﺵﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩﺩﺭﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲﺍﺯﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮﮔﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺻﺒﺎﺣﻲﺑﺸﻮﺩﺑﺎﺁﻥﺳﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ »ﺣﻜﻢ« ﭼﻨﺪﺗﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ» .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﻫﻢ
ﺩﺳﺘﻜﻢ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﻭﺗﺎﻳﻲ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺼﻪ ﻭ »ﻋﻜﺲﻫﺎ« ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺏ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﭘﮋﻭﺍﻙﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲﻭﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻭ
ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮﻫﻢﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎﻱﺯﻳﺒﺎ،ﺍﻳﻦﻇﻦﺭﺍﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭘﻴﺪﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺗﺮﺍﺵ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻠﻪﮔﻠﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺣﺮﻓﻲ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ،
ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮﮔﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﻮﻳﻢ.
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺣﻮﺻﻠــﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣــﺎ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺷــﺎﻛﻠﻪ ﺑﺼﺮﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻗﺖ
ﻭ ﺭﻳﺰﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﺳــﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻛﻼﻧﺸــﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥِ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮ ﮔﻮﺷﺶ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﭘﺮﺁﺏِ ﭼﺸــﻤﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﺎﻧﺶ ﺑﻲﺫﺭﻩﺍﻱ
ﻣﻜﺚ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﺣﺮﻑ
ﻧﻤﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺎﺭ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪﺳــﺮﺍﻍ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﻴﭻ ﻭ ﺧﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﺶ ﺳﺮﺭﺍﺳﺖﺗﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺩﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺵ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ »ﺷﺒﺢ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ«
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﻧﻮﺋﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﺳﺎژ ﺑﻪﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ
ﻭ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻋﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ
ﻓﺮﻫــﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻧﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
»ﺷﻮﻛﺮﺍﻥ« ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﻋﺒﺪ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﺎﺩﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺯﻧﺪﻩ ،ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺩ،
ﺷﻘﺎﻳﻖ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺒﻨﻢ ﺩﺭﻭﻳﺶ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻓﺮﺽ :ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻘــﺶ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻧﺸﺴﺖ ،ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ؟
65
6
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ«ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻗﻴﺼﺮ
ﮔﻮﺯﻥﻫﺎ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻰ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺕ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻃﺎﻫﺒﺎﺯ
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺑﻴﺴـﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺠﻤﻴـﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ
ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺑـﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺴـﺎﺏ ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠـﻢ ﻛﻮﺗـﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻤـﻪ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ
»ﭘﺴـﺮ ﺷﺮﻗﻰ« ﻭ »ﺍﺳﺐ« ﺑﻴﺴـﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ
ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳـﺖ؛ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺸﻰ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﻫﻢﻧﺴـﻼﻧﺶ ﭘـﺮﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻛـﻢﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ
ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻧﺸـﻴﻨﻰ ﺗﺮﺟﻴـﺢ ﻣﻰﺩﻫـﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻄﺶ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﺮﺳﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﺑﺒﺮﺩ .ﻣـﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺑـﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺑـﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭘﺮﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸـﻴﺐ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﭘﻨﺠﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺵ ﺧﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻟﻄﻒ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺎ )(1347
ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻰﻛﻪﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪﻛﺎﺭﺵﺩﺭﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﺗﻨﻬﺎﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺭﻯﺳﺎﻣﻮﺋﻞﺧﺎﭼﻴﻜﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ« ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑــﺮﺍﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥ،
ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮ ﻣﻮﻟﻦﺭﻭژ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﺵ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ 27ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
10ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ»ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺎ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺸﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛــﺮﺩ ،ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺭ
66
ﻛﺎﻣﻞﺟﻠﻮﻯﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﺑﺮﺩ.ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰﺟﻮﺍﻥﺣﺘﻰﺑﻪﻣﺪﺩﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﺍﻥ
ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯ ﻭﺛﻮﻗﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻢﺑﺮﺍﻯﺑﺎﺯﻯﺩﺭﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪﻛﻨﺪ.ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ»ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪﺑﻴﺎ«ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﭘﺮﺳﺮ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﺸــﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻮﻳﺪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻔﺎﺭﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ
ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ» .ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺎ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯ ﻭﺛﻮﻗــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻳﻨــﺪﻩﺍﺵ )ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺛﻮﻗﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﺳﺎﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ(ﺟﻠﺐﻛﻨﺪﻭﻫﻢﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕﺳﺎﺧﺖ»ﻗﻴﺼﺮ«ﺭﺍﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻗﻴﺼﺮ )(1348
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ »ﻗﻴﺼﺮ« ﻛﻠﻴﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻫﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷــﺪ» .ﻗﻴﺼﺮ« ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺑﺼﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﺟﺴﺎﺭﺕﺁﻣﻴﺰﺵ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻛﻠﻴﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸــﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻪ 40ﺷﻤﺴﻲ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﺎ »ﻗﻴﺼﺮ« ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻮﺵ ﻣﻬﺮﺟﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ »ﮔﺎﻭ« ﻣﻮﺝ ﻧﻮﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ
ﻭ ﻗﺼﻪﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮﻱ ﺗــﺎﺯﻩ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
»ﻗﻴﺼﺮ« ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺎﺭﺳــﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤــﻲ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣــﺎ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﻨﺲ
ﺳﺮﺏ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ »ﻗﻴﺼﺮ« ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ
ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺪ.
»ﻗﻴﺼﺮ« ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﺴﻨﺪﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﻠﻴﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﻋﺎﻣﻪﭘﺴﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ،
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﭘﺮﻓﺮﻭﺵﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻱ )(1349
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ »ﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻱ« ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ »ﻗﻴﺼﺮ« ﺭﺍ
ﺭﺍﺿﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺳــﺒﻚ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﺷﺪ» .ﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻱ« ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ »ﻗﻴﺼﺮ«.
ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﺵ
ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺿﺎ
ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻣﺤﻜﻢ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﺻﻼﺑﺖ ﻗﻴﺼﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻧﻲ
ﻫﻢ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺗﺤﺮﻙ ﻭ ﺻﻼﺑﺖ ﻗﻴﺼﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ» .ﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻱ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩ »ﻗﻴﺼﺮ«
ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺍﺵ ﺁﻛﻞ )(1350
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺵ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ
ﺧﺎﻙ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻢ ﻗﺼﻪ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻠــﻖ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﻠﻘﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻭ ﺁﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﭘﺴﻨﺪﻳﺪ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ» .ﺩﺍﺵ ﺁﻛﻞ« ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺼﻪ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑــﻪ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻗﺼﻪ »ﺩﺍﺵﺁﻛﻞ« ،ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻧﻜﻮﻫﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ،ﺯﺧﻢﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻋﺎﺻﻲ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﻪﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻠﻮچ )(1351
ﭘﻨﺠﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ »ﻗﻴﺼﺮ« ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻧﺸــﻴﻦ .ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺑﻠﻮچ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﻴﺼﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﺎﻏﻴﺮﺕ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﺘﻚ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺳــﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻠﻮچ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﺩ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻰ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺩﻝ ﻭ
ﺳﺎﺩﻩﻧﺸﻴﻦ ،ﺍﺳــﻴﺮ ﺯﺭﻕ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻕ ﺷﻬﺮﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎ
ﺟﺎﻳــﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻠﻮچ ﻓﺮﺍﻣــﻮﺵ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ
ﻫﺪﻓﻰ ﺑﻪﺷــﻬﺮ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻢ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻯ ﺍﻭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺤﺖﺍﻟﺸــﻌﺎﻉ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻣﺶ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ »ﺑﻠﻮچ« ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﻯ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺷﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺧﺎﻙ )(1352
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ »ﺑﻠﻮچ« ﺑﻪﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻗﺼﻪ
»ﺁﻭﺳﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﺑﺎ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ« ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﺩﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﺼﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺸــﺪ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ »ﺧﺎﻙ« ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﺭﺩ ﭘﺎﻱ ﮔﺮگ
ﺗﻴﻎ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﻳﺸﻢ
ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴــﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯ ﻭﺛﻮﻗﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺮﺯ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻓﻴﻖ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ
»ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺎ« ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ »ﺧﺎﻙ« ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﮔﻮﺯﻥﻫﺎ )(1353
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 53ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻫﻢﺍﺭﺯ »ﻗﻴﺼﺮ« ﺭﺍ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ» .ﮔﻮﺯﻥﻫﺎ« ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﻪ »ﻗﻴﺼﺮ« ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ،
ﺗﺤﺴــﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ» .ﮔﻮﺯﻥﻫﺎ«
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﺴــﺎﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺻــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻃﻠﺒﻴﺪ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﭼﺮﻳﻚﻫﺎﻱ
ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ،ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﺯﺩﮔﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮ »ﺳﻴﺪ« ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯ ﻭﺛﻮﻗﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﻳﻚ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻣﻌﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ »ﮔﻮﺯﻥﻫﺎ«
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸــﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻴﺖﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﺗﻲ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﮕﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ» .ﮔﻮﺯﻥﻫﺎ« ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ،
ﭘﺮﻓﺮﻭﺵﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﺎﻝ 54ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻏﺰﻝ )(1355
ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻧﺎﻛﺠﺎﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ »ﻏﺰﻝ« ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﭘﺮﺳﺮ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍﻱ »ﮔﻮﺯﻥﻫﺎ« ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ،
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺵ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺼﻪﺍﻱ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﺪ» .ﻏﺰﻝ« ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺑﺼﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ »ﻏﺰﻝ« ﺑﺪﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
»ﻏﺰﻝ« ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺼﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺭﺧﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺍﻫﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺑﻮﺭﺧﺲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻲ
ﻓﺮﺩﻳﻦ ،ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﺎﻣﻪﭘﺴﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺸﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ
ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﺸﺪ.
ﺳﻔﺮ ﺳﻨﮓ )(1356
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰﻛﻪﺑﺎﻋﺚﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭﻯﻭﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ»ﺳﻔﺮ
ﺳﻨﮓ« ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻪﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻗﺼﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﻮﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥﺍﺛﺮﺑﻠﻜﻪﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰﺍﻭﺍﺯﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪﻭﻗﺪﺭﺕﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻭﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ
ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯﻧﻪﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥﺩﻭﺭﺍﺳﺖ.ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰﺩﺭﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶﻛﻪﻳﻚﺳﺎﻝﭘﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺷﺪ،ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻰﻭﻗﻮﻉﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰﺭﺍﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺟﻠﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻫﻢﻧﺴﻠﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ» .ﺳﻔﺮ ﺳﻨﮓ« ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺑﻬﺰﺍﺩ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻮﻳﺴﻰﻫﺎﻯﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺷﺪ.ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻓﻴﻠﻢﺭﺍﻛﻪﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﺁﻥﺭﺍﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ،ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩﺧﻮﺩﺍﻭﻭﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ» .ﺳﻔﺮ ﺳﻨﮓ« ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺧﻮﺑﻰﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ )(1360
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ »ﺳﻔﺮ ﺳــﻨﮓ« ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔــﻲﺍﺵ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨــﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻣــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑــﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ
»ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣــﺰ« ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 60ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻳﻜــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ.
»ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ« ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ »ﺷــﺐ ﺳﻤﻮﺭ« ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﺍﻡ
ﺑﻴﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺷــﺒﺎﺡ )ﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻴﺮﻟﻮﺣﻰ( ،ﺣﺎﺟﻰ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ
)ﻋﻠــﻰ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰ( ،ﺳــﻔﻴﺮ )ﻓﺮﻳﺒﺮﺯ ﺻﺎﻟــﺢ( ﻭ ﻣﺮگ ﻳﺰﮔــﺮﺩ )ﺑﻬﺮﺍﻡ
ﺑﻴﻀﺎﻳﻰ( ،ﭘﻨﺞ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻓﺠﺮ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ »ﺍﺷﺒﺎﺡ«
ﮔﺮﻭﻫﺒﺎﻥ
67
ﻭ »ﺳﻔﻴﺮ« ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﺗﺮﻫﺎ »ﺣﺎﺟﻰ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ« ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ )ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ( ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻀﺎﻳــﻰ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰ »ﮔﺮﻭﻫﺒﺎﻥ« ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺧﺸــﻦ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ» .ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻓﺠﺮ ﻃﻰ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻧﺲ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻯ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻗﺼﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺑﻂ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ.
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ
ﺭﺩﭘﺎﻱ ﮔﺮگ )(1370
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﺶ ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ ،ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ »ﺭﺩﭘﺎﻯ ﮔﺮگ« ﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﻪﺳــﺮﺍﻍ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳــﻮژﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺍﻫــﺶ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ .ﺑﺎﺯﻫــﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻏﻴﺮﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕــﻰ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺱ ﻭ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ،ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﻭ ﺣﺠﺎﺏ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺯﺧﻢﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻭ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﺵ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﮕﻰ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻤﻴﺰﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻛﻨﺪ» .ﺭﺩ ﭘﺎﻯ ﮔﺮگ« ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﻮﺳــﺘﺎﻟﮋﻳﻚ
ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﺗﻴﻎ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﻳﺸﻢ )(1364
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ
»ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ« ﺳﺮﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻗﻴــﻒ »ﺧــﻂ ﻗﺮﻣــﺰ«
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫــﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺳﻮژﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ؛
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺮﺯ ﻗﺮﻳﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺧﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎ ﭘﺮﺳﻪﺯﻧﻰ ﺭﺿﺎﻯ ﺯﺧﻢﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺗﻠﺦ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ »ﺗﻴﻎ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﻳﺸــﻢ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﻣﻰﺳﺎﺯﺩ.
»ﺭﺩ ﭘﺎﻯ ﮔﺮگ« ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ »ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ« ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﭙﺴﻨﺪﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ.
ﭼﺎﻗﻮﻛﺸــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ »ﺗﻴﻎ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﻳﺸﻢ« ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ
»ﺭﺩﭘﺎﻯ ﮔﺮگ« ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ
ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸــﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻓﺠﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺟــﺮﺡ ﻭ
ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪﺳﻤﺖ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﺩﻭﺳﺖﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺴﻠﻰﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﻯ ﺗﺸﺒﻴﻪ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﺵ ﺯﺧﻤﻰ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ
ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ
ﻭ ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﺎﻟﻴــﻪﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ،ﺻﺮﻓــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺗﺮﺣﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺭﻭﻯ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﮔﻴﺸﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﺘﻨﺪﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺗﻜﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺮﺳــﻰﻫﺎ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ )(1373
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺮﺱ )ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺮﺯ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻰ( ﻭ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ )ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺻﺎﻟﺢﻋﻼ( ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ،ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺟﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ )ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﺗﻴﻎ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﻳﺸــﻢ« ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﺗﻜﻪﭘﺎﺭﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺳــﻄﺤﻰ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺬﺍﻕ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺵ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺪﺗﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﻛﻴﻔﻰ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ
»ﺟﻴﻢ« ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺍﺭﺷــﺎﺩ ،ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺻﻒﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ».ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ« ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ
ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻰ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺳﺮﺏ )(1367
ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ،ﺧﻮﺩﺑﺎﺧﺘﮕﻰ ﻫﻮﻳﺘﻰ ،ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢ ﺩﻭ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻛﻢﻛﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﻓﻖ »ﺗﻴﻎ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﻳﺸﻢ« ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺮﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﻓﺎﺭﺳــﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﻛﻤﻲ ﻣﻬﺠﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳــﺎﺯﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﻭﺑﻠﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﮔﺮ ﻋﺎﻡ
»ﺳﺮﺏ« ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﻳﺶ ﺳﻬﻞﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ» .ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ« ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﺧﻢ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ.
»ﺳﺮﺏ« ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻣﻞﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻗﺼﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺳﺮﺍﻍ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺏ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ.
ﻋﻤــﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘــﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺟﺎﻱ
ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ )(1374
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
»ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ« ﺳﺮﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ »ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ« ﺑﻪ
ﻓﻠﺴﻄﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪﺳﻤﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﻋﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
ﻧﺴﻠﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻮ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ» .ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ«
ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺭ )(1368
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﺍﻯﺍﺵ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ »ﺳــﺮﺏ« ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺳــﺨﺖ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳــﺎﺯﺩ» .ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺭ« ﻛﺎﻣﻞﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳــﺘﻮﺩﻧﺪ؛ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ »ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ« ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺩﻭﭘﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺎﻗﺖ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺭﻃﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺴــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺯﺧﻢ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ،ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﻴﺮﻩ ﻭ ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳــﻰ ﺩﺭ »ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ« ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺑﻪﺳــﺮﺍﻍ
ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﺶ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺼﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﻃﻴﻔــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ »ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣــﺎﺭ« ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ.
ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ )(1375
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺭﻭﺯ،
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳــﻲ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑــﻪ ﻛﺎﻣــﻼ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﻓﻖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺳــﻂ
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﺳــﺘﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﻔﺘــﺎﺩ ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ« ﻭ »ﺳــﻠﻄﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳــﺎﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ »ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺭ« ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺭﻧﮓﻭﺑﻮﻱ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﮔﺮﻭﻫﺒﺎﻥ )(1369
ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ »ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ« ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻱ« ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﻱ ﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻮﺗــﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻫﻢ
»ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺭ« ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻃﺮﺣﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻣﺒﻮﺯﻳﺎ ﭘﺮﺗﻮﻯ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺗﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺱ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ» .ﮔﺮﻭﻫﺒﺎﻥ« ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟــﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻬﺶ ﻓﺮﻳﺒﺮﺯ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ »ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺭ« ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻋﺮﺏﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻫﺪﻳﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ» .ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ«
ﺷﺪ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻴﺸﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ
68
ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ
ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺿﻌﻒ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺮﺳﺪﺱ )(1376
ﺣﻜﻢ )(1384
ﺍﺯ »ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ« ﻭ »ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ« ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻭ ﻋﺎﻡ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪﻋﻤﻞ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ »ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ« ،ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﭘــﺮﻛﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻪﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ
ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺟﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤــﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﺋﺐ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺒﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻨﮕﺴﺘﺮﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ» .ﺣﻜﻢ« ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺧﻮﺵﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ» ،ﻣﺮﺳﺪﺱ« ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﺴﻨﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﺍﻭ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻧﺴــﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺼﻪﮔﻮﻳﻰ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺜﻞ »ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ« ﻳﻚ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻑ ،ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺑﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻣﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﭘﺴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺼﻪ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺷﻤﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﭼﻨﺪﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻗﺒﻠﻰﺍﺵ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺮﺳﺪﺱ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻛﻰ »ﺣﻜﻢ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺟﺸــﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻧﺮﺳــﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻜﺮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻭ ﺑﻰﺁﻻﻳﺸﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻰﺭﺣﻢ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﭘﻠﻴﺪ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻋﺰﺕﺍﻟﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻰ،
»ﺣﻜﻢ« ﻭ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﺭﻧﮓ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﺯﺩ.
ﺧﺴﺮﻭﺷــﻜﻴﺒﺎﻳﻰ ،ﻟﻴﻼ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰ ،ﺑﻬﺮﺍﻡ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻱ
ﺧﻴﻠﻰﻫــﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴــﺖ »ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ« ﻭ
ﺭﺍﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﭘﻮﻻﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ
ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ »ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻗﺎﺑــﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺣﻜﻢ« ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﻓﺮﻳﺒﺮﺯ ﻋﺮﺏﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
»ﺣﻜــﻢ« ﭘــﻮﻻﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳــﻰ ﺧﻮﺵ
ﻗﺼﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ
ﺣﺘــﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺛﻮﻗــﻰ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﻣﻰﺩﺭﺧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧــﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺪﺭﺵ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻋﺮﺏﻧﻴﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻋﻤﺪﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ
ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺑــﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑــﺎﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﭘﺪﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ
ﺧﻠﻖ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺎﻛﺠﺎﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻰ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ
ﻧﺎﻣﺎﻧﻮﺱ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ
ﻓﺮﻭﺗﻦ ﺳــﭙﺮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﺴــﻰ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻧﺎﻣــﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﻓﺮﻭﺗﻦ ﻫﻢ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ )(1385
ﺧﻮﺵ ﺩﺭﺧﺸــﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ
»ﺣﻜﻢ« ﻭ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺷﺪ.
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺼﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ )(1377
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻋﻤﺪﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺎﻛﺠﺎﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻮﺱ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ» .ﺣﻜﻢ« ﻭ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﻼءﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﭘﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 77ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﺵ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ »ﺣﻜــﻢ« ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﻈــﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ« ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺲﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﻛﺴــﻰ ﺻﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺴﻨﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻋﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺳﺨﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﺳــﺨﺖ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻯ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺿﻌﻒ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺼﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻗﻮﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﺠﻮﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ )(1388
ﻭ ﺩﻭﺳﺖﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺠﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ )(1378
ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
»ﺍﻋﺘــﺮﺍﺽ« ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﺸــﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ .ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ
ﻣﻠﺘﻬﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻡﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ »ﮔﻮﺯﻥﻫﺎ« ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺼﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻭ ﻗﺼﻪﮔﻮﻳﻰ
ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔﺰﻳﻨﺪ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳــﻰ ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
»ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ« ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦﻣﺼﺮﻑﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻍ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﺼﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻝ ﺿﺒﻂ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺟﺎﻟﺐﺗﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻰ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﻛﻨﺪ» .ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ« ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﻩﻭﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺯﺩﮔﻲ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺁﺷــﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻠﺨﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻗﺼﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪﺭﺥ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﻫﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺍﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲﺍﺵ ﭼﺎﻗﻮ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻪ ﺳــﻤﺒﻠﻴﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺫﺍﺋﻘﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻫﻪ )ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻋﺘــﺮﺍﺽ( ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻭ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﻛﻬﻨﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﺎ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺑــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫــﻢ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻰ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺕ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮕﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ )(1382
ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺐ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺷــﺮ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻮﺍﺷــﻰ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺧﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺮﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ »ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ« ﻭ »ﻋﺒﺪ« ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑــﺎﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ »ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ« ﻭ »ﺳــﻠﻄﺎﻥ« ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﮔﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ )ﭘﻮﻻﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ(
ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ »ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ«ﺵ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺧﻴﺮﻳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺷــﺮﻳﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳــﺖ .ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ .ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ »ﺿﻴﺎﻓﺖ« ﺗﺎ »ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ« ﻫﺮ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺎﺧﺼﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭼﺸﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﻣﻼ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ »ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ« ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺟﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺒﺪ ﭘﻰ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺑﺮﺩ؛ ﮔﻮﻳﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻰ ﻛﺸــﻒ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻛﻴﺎﺭﺳــﺘﻤﻰ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻴﺘﺮﺍژ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻫﺮ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻓﺠﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﻑ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ
ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺑﺮﭘﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ
)ﻣﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻣﺎﻥ( -ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻮﺵ ﻣﻬﺮﺟﻮﻳﻰ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﻫﻢﻧﺴﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻛﺠﺎﺁﺑﺎﺩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ »ﺣﻜﻢ« ﻭ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺬﺍﻕ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺵ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻭ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﺪﭘﺎﺭﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ؛ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭘﻠﻴﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ »ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ« ﻭ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﺯﺩﮔﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻧﺎﻣﺮﺍﺩﻯﻫﺎ.
69
7
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ«ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺭﻭﺡ ﺧﺮﺍﺵ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﺪﺍﻥﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﺭﺿﺎ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺗﺎﻥﺑﺎ »ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ« ﺷﻜﺮﺍﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ؟
ﺧﺪﺍ ﺭﻭ ﺷــﻜﺮ ،ﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻘﺪﺭ ﺟﻮﻭﻥﻫﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻦ
ﻗﺪ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ.
ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺁﻥ
ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻡ ،ﺍﺷــﺘﻴﺎﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲﺍﻡ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﻡ» .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ«
ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﺵ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﻪﺍﺵ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ،
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻻﺍﻗﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗــﺎ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﺕﻫــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﮔــﺬﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ
ﺧﺮﺳﻨﺪﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﻟﺤﻈﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻡ.
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑــﺎﻥ« ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗــﻲ ﻣﺘﻔــﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺁﻥ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺍﻭ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﻧﻴﺰ .ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺗﻮﺩ ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻭ »ﻳﻐﻤﺎ ﮔﻠﺮﻭﻳــﻲ« ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ
ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﻣــﻞ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻋﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻔﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ» :ﺷﺎﻛﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻢ .ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ«
ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ »ﻗﺮﻩ ﮔﻮﺯﻟﻮ« ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ »ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺗﺎ
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﺶ ﻧﻨﺸﺴــﺖ ،ﺭﺍﺿﻲ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﺮﺳﻨﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺿﻲ.
»ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ« ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺰﺭﮔــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ
ﻫﻨﺮﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﺵ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ
»ﺳﻬﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻤﺘﻨﻊ« ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﺵ ﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺳﺎﻋﺎﺗﻲ
ﺧﻮﺷﻲ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﻓﻴﻖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﻫﺮ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
70
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﺍﺵ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﺖﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺳﻮﺍﺱ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻳﺎﺩﻡ
ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻟﺤﻈﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺗﺶ ﺣﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ
ﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻢ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻌﻨﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻴﺘﺮﺍژﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپِ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﺪﻯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪﻫﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؛ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺳﻄﺤﻰ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭ
ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ »ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ« ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺟﺰ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺳــﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺯﺩﮔﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻰ
ﭘﺎپ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ – ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺶ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ -ﺗﻦ
ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ« ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ
ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻠﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻭ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺛﺮﺵ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﻣﻠﻮﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢﻫﺎ ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻯ ژﺍﻧﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ »ﺣﻜﻢ« ﺩﺭ ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺲ ﺟﺸﻦ
ِ
ﻧﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺳــﺮ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﭘﺮﺳــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﭼﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻢ .ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻰﻃﺒﻘﻪ
ﻭ ﻧﺎﻫﻤﮕﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲﺍﻡ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻢ.
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﻠﺦ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺝﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﻳﺰ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺷﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺟﺰ »ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪ« ﺑﺮﺝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩ؟
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺶ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻟﻄﻒ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮﻡ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻋﺮﺻﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﮔﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻠﻖ )ﺷﻬﺮﺍﻡ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ( ،ﻣﺮگ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﻲ ﻳﻚ
ﺭﻭﻳﺎ )ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺟﻴﺮﺍﻧﻲ( ،ﺻﺒﺢ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ )ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺍﻃﻴﺎﺑﻲ( ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻘــﺶ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻢ.
ﻓﺮﺯﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﮔﺰﻟﻮ
ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺳــﺮﮔﺮﻡ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑــﺎﻥ« ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ،ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺷــﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ
ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ،ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ« ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﻬﺮ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺼﻪ
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ
ﺑــﺎ ﻓﻀــﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﺳــﺘﺎﻟﮋﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﺘــﺮ ﺭﻧﮕﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫﺎ ﺳــﺎﺯﺑﻨﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻗﻄﻊ ﻭ ﻭﺻﻞ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﻮﺍﻯ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﺷــﻨﺎﻳﻰﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺭﺋﻴﺲ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰﺍﻡ
ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻡ ،ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺑﻚ ﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘــﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻡ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺘﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺴــﺘﮕﻰ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻦ ﻭ ﭼﻪ
ﺗﻢ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺒﺮ ،ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻯ ﺫﻫﻨﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻰﮔﻔــﺖ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻓﻠﺰﻯ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺟﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺭﺍ
ﺧﺮﺍﺵ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﻥ ﺑﭽﻜﺪ
ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺯﺑﺮ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻰ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﻇﺮﻳﻒ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ
ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﻠﺒﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ
ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
www.mosalas.ir
¾zÄkºH
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﻣﺮﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ
ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ.
71
ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻦ
ﭘﺎﺭﺳﺎ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﻟﻠﻬﻲ
ﻳﻜﻢ :ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻰ،
ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﻳﻔﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﺧﺺﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺿﺪ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎﻧﻮﺋﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ،ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ
ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺴﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻭ ﺳﺘﺮگ» :ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺣﻖﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﻯ
ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ« ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ،ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ ﻧﺴــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺴــﺘﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﻪ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴﺎ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ »ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻯ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺑﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥﺍﺳــﺖ« ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ»ﺻﺪﻕ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ« .ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ،ﺩﺭﻭﻍ
ﺭﺍ ﭼﻨﻴــﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ» :ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺗﻌﻤﺪﻯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ« ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﻯ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻣﻠﻐﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﻟﻄﻤﻪﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﺑﺮﻭﻯ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﮔﺮﻳﺰ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻗﺎﺗﻞ ﺗﻮﺳــﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻭﺩ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﻗﺘﻞ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺷﻤﺎﺗﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ
72
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ
ﻋﻤﺪﻯ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﻛﺎﻧﺖ ،ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ
ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻣﺮﺗﻜﺐ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ »:ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺑﻰﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰﺑﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺸﺮﻳﺖ ﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ.
ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺧﺎﻃﻰ ﻣﻀﺮ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺩﺳﺖﻛﻢ ،ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝﺑﺸﺮﻳﺖ
ﻣﻀﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺒﺎﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ «.ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎ ،ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺪﺭﺕ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺘﻜﻠﻤﻰ ،ﻣﻄﻠﻖﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﺘﻰ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻭ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ،
ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺎﻳﺰ ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻰ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﻟﺮﻋﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ،ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻭ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻘﺾ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭﻇﻴﻔــﻪ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺑﻰﮔﻨﺎﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﺿــﺮﺭ .ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻗﺎﺗﻞ ﺗﺨﻠﻒ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪﻛﻠﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺘﻞ ﻣﺤﺘﻤﻞ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳــﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﻣﻄﻠﻖﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻃﺎﻋﺖ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﻭﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﺑﺸﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﻭﻡ :ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺩﺭﻭﻍﻫﺎ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺫﻳﻠﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﭘﺎﻙ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ،ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﮔﻔﺘﻦِ
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺷﻜﻨﺠﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﺟﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ،ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺭﺍﺳﺘﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳﻰ ،ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ،
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ »ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ« ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺎ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ
ﻣﻰﺷﻤﺎﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻨﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﭼﺸﻤﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﮔﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻌﺪﻱ ،ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻯ ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﻏﺰﺍﻟﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺮﺍﺝﺍﻟﺴﻌﺎﺩﻩ ،ﺳﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﻍﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﻴﻢ .ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ
ﺩﺭﻭﻍﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ،ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮﻛﺲ
ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺩﺭﭘﻰ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺘﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﻳﺾ
ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺑﻰﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ :ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﭼﻴﺴــﺖ؟ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴــﻰ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ )ﻛﺴﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ؟ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﻳﺎ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺛﺎﻟﺚ؟( ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ؟ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻯ:
»ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖﺧﻴﺰ .ﺧﻴﻠﻰ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ،ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖﺧﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻳﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ،ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ
ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖﺧﻴﺰ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺳﻮﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ «.ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﻳﻎ
ﻛﻪ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻫﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ ،ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺷﺶﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳــﻮﻡ :ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰ ،ﺻﺪﻕ ﻭ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﺑﻪﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ﻭ
ﺭﺫﻳﻠﺖ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ،ﺍﺑﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﮔﻔﺖ .ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮﺍﻧﺶ ﻭﺣﻰ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ
ﺷــﺮﻭﺭ ،ﺻــﺪﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺭﺳــﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧــﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ،ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺩ ﺭﺳﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻰ ﺑﺎﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳــﻰ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺧﻀﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﺍﻭﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻭﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺣﺘــﻰ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ »ﺩﺭﻭﻍ
ﺷــﺮﻳﻒ« ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﻛﺒﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻛﺴﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻯ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺩﺭﻭﻍﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻋﻼﻣﺖ ﺑﻰﺣﺮﻣﺘﻰ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭ،
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺫﺍﺕﺍﻟﺒﻴﻦ ،ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ .ﻣﻮﻣﻦ
ﺩﺭﭘﻰ ﺧﻠﻮﺹ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﮔﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ
ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﻋــﺎﺩﺕ ﻛﻨــﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﻓﺮﻳﺒﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻭ
ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺧﻮﺩﻓﺮﻳﺒﻰ ﻓﻰﻧﻔﺴــﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻓﻼﺳــﻔﻪ ﻭ
ﻣﻮﺿــﻮﻉ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻬــﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ
ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﻓﺮﻳﺒﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﻜﻴــﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﺎﻳﻖﻭ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺭﻭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﻳﺎ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﻛﺎﻣﻞﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳﻰ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺳﻮﺍﻝﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﻓﺮﻳﺒﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ.
ﺧﻮﺩﻓﺮﻳﺒﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﻰ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻭ ﻫﮕﻞ ،ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻪﻧﻔﺲ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﮔﺰﻳﺴﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺍﺭﺗﺒــﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺧﻮﺩﻓﺮﻳﺒﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺗﻨﮕﺎﺗﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ،ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺗﺒﻰ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥ
ﭼﻪ ﻧﺴـﺒﺘﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻰ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻓﻼﺳﻔﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺸـﻐﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳـﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺟﺪﻯﺗﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﻛﺸﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻰ ﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ،
ﻧﻈﺎﻣـﻰ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛـﻪ ﻣﺒﻠﻎ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻧﺎﮔﺴﺴـﺘﻨﻰ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﻰﺍﺵ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﻋﻄﻒ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﭙﻬﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﻭ
ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺳـﺶﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺷﻤﺎﺳﺖ.
ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﻤﻮﻝ
ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﭘﺴﻨﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻤﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻳﻞ ﺣﻜﻤﺖ ﻋﻤﻠــﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻣﻰﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﻨﺰﻝ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻣﺪﻥ ،ﻫﺮ ﺳﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﻮﻻﺕ ﺣﻜﻤﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻧﺴﺒﺖﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻜﻤﺖ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﺷﺨﺼﺎ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻤﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻤــﺖ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ »ﻫﺴــﺖ« ﻭ »ﺑﺎﻳﺪ« ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﻻﻟﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦﺩﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂﺍﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺫﻳﻞ ﺣﻜﻤﺘﻰ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ
ﺑﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺘﻰ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻇﺮﻳﻔﻰ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺗﺒﻰ
ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺷــﻰ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷــﻮﻳﻢ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ،ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻬﻤﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺧﺮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻏﻢ
ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁﺷﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺛﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ،ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﭼﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﺫﻳﻞ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻯﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻛﻴﺎﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻭﻻ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﭙﺲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ
ﺷﻜﻮﻩ ﻭ ﺟﺒﺮﻭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﻯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﻭ
ﺩﻻﻟﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺹ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ
ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﻭ ﮔﻢ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﺖﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﻉ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺒﺎﺡ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻫﺮﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﻠﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺗﺠﻮﻳﺰ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ،
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﮔﻢ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺑﻪﺭﺥ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺒﺮﻭﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺪﻝ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﺣﺴﺐ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺗﺒﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺷــﻰ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺗﺒﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻛﻴﺎﻭﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ .ﺟﺎﻥ ﻛﻼﻡ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺧﺮﻯ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﺶ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺗﺒﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ
ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻭﻻ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺛﺎﻟﺜﺎ ﺧﻠﻂ
ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺑﻌﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ،ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻣﺎﻛﻴﺎﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺑﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﻳﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟــﺐ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟــﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜﻼ
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ،ﺑﺴﻂ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻏﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺖﺍﷲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻏﺎﻳﻰ
ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺖﺍﷲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺫﻳﻞ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ
ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ
ﺑﻪﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺘﻰ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺗﺒﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ.
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ،ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﻮﺍﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣـﺎﺕ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻗـﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻛـﻪ ﻳﻜـﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻔﺶ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﺑﺴـﻂ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ
73
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳـﺐ ﺑـﺎ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺮﻩ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ؟
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﺍﻻﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﺼﻮﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩ.ﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻢﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻻ
ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﻳﻚﺍﻣﺮﻛﺎﻣﻼﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﻣﻨﺪﺍﺳﺖﻭﺳﻪﺍﺻﻞﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺁﻥﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖﺷﻮﺩ.ﺍﻭﻝﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺑﺎﻳﺪﺩﺭﺫﻳﻞﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡﺷﺮﻳﻌﺖﺑﺎﺷﺪﻭ
ﺩﺭﻋﺮﺽﺁﻥﻗﺮﺍﺭﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﻭﺩﺭﺿﺪﻳﺖﺑﺎﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ.ﺩﻭﻡﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻫﻢﻭﻣﻬﻢﺩﺭﺁﻥﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖﺷﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﺪ.ﺳﻮﻡﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺑﺎﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥﺩﺍﻧﺎﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥﺁﻥﺻﺤﺒﺖﺷﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﺪ.ﭘﺲﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺭﺍﻳﻚﺍﻣﺮﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪﺍﻯ،ﺷﺨﺼﻰﻳﺎﺫﻭﻗﻰﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ.ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﺩﺭ
ﺧﺼﻮﺹﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺑﺎﻳﺪﺑﻪﺟﻬﺘﻰﻛﻪﺑﺎﻳﺪﻧﺴﺒﺖﺑﻪﺁﻥﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺳﻨﺠﻰ
ﺷﻮﺩ،ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪﺑﻮﺩ.ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﻳﻚﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪﺑﻰﺟﻬﺖﻧﻴﺴﺖﻭﺑﺎﻳﺪﺑﻪﺟﻬﺖ
ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ،ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﺶ ،ﻳﻚ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ
ﺍﻭﻻ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻌﻰ ،ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ
ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺲ ﻫﺮ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺘﻰ ﻳﻚ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﺪﻳﻞ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺲ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻰ
ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖﮔﺮﺍ ،ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻰ ﺑﺪﻳﻞ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﺭﻭﻳﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺧﺮ ﻭ
ﺟﻬﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺘﻰ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﭘﺸﺘﺶ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﺪﻳﻠﻰ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻯ
ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺭﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢﻭﺍﻳﻦﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﻣﺼﻠﺤﺘﻰﺭﺍﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ.ﻣﺎﺑﺎﻳﺪﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﻧﻜﺘﻪ
ﻫﻢﺗﻮﺟﻪﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢﻛﻪﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩﺣﻖﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻭﻣﻨﺰﻟﺖﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺲ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ
ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ،ﻳﻚﺍﺭﺯﺵﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻰﺗﺮﻯﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ.ﻣﺜﻼ
ﻣﺎﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢﻛﻪﺩﺭﻭﻍﻳﻚﻓﻌﻞﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰﺍﺳﺖﻭﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻧﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ .ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺬﻣﻮﻡﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ
ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢﻛﻪﺍﮔﺮﺑﻴﻦﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖﻭﺍﺻﻼﺡﻛﻪﻫﺮﺩﻭﻓﻌﻞﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ،
ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺿﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ؟ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺮ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻰ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ »ﺍﻥﺍﷲ ﻳﺤﺐ ﺍﻟﻜــﺬﺏ ﻓﻰﺍﻻﺻﻼﺡ« .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ
ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ.ﻳﻌﻨﻰﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢﻣﺎﺍﮔﺮﺑﻴﺎﻳﻴﻢﻭﻳﻚﺍﺭﺯﺵﺣﻘﻴﻘﻰﺭﺍﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺘﻰ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺟﺎﻳﻰﻛﻪﺑﻪﺳﻤﺖ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻰﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﻣﻰﺭﻭﻳﻢ،
ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻬﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺕﺗﺎﻡﺑﺎﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻰﻣﺎﺑﺎﺷﺪﻭﻣﺎﺑﻨﺎﺑﻪﺣﻔﻆﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺍﺳﻴﺮ
ﻣﺎﻛﻴﺎﻭﻟﻴﺴﻢﻧﺸﻮﻳﻢﻭﺑﺮﺍﻯﺣﻔﻆﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﻳﺎﺑﺴﻂﻗﺪﺭﺕ،ﺍﺑﺎﺣﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺭﺍﺑﺎﺏﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻧﻜﺘــﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻰ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻯ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻨﻮﻳﺴــﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻣﻨﺪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺷــﻔﺎﻑ
ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﻣﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳــﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴــﺮﺩ .ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ( ،ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻚ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻻﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺑﭙﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ،ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺛﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺘﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ،ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﻰ ،ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺣﺴــﻦ)ﻉ( ﺑﺎ
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺯﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺣﺴــﻦ)ﻉ(
ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤــﺎﻅ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻰ ﻭ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ،ﻳﻜﻰ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻳﻦﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﺮﺿﻰ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﺷﻮﺩ.
74
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺑﺴﻂ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻛﻴﺎﻭﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺴــﺐ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔــﻆ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻫﺮ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺒﺎﺡ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺴــﺒﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ .ﭘﺲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻯ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺳــﺨﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺳــﻠﻴﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺷــﺨﺼﻰ
ﻫﺪﻑ ﻭ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺗﺒﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻳﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺭﻭﺷﻦ
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻜﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﻓــﺮﺩﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﻴﻦ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺰﻩ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤــﻮﻉ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﭼــﺎﺭ ﺍﺑﺎﺣﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ
ﻫﺮ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺧﻠﻂ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻭ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻧﺸﻮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﻋﺎﻟﻤﺎﻥ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﻭ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺖ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺟﺰﻣﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻰ ،ﺍﻭﻻ
ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺤﺖﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﻉ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﻋﺮﺿﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻻﺯﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻭ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﺍﻧﻀﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ
ﻣﺸـﺨﺼﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺧﺼﺎﻳﻞ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ
ﻭ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺩﺍﻧﺴـﺖ
ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﺫﻫﻨﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺰﻳﺴـﺘﻰ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﺫﻫﻨﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞﺩﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ،
ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ؟
ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻰ ،ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺷــﻬﻮﺩﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﻳﻢ ،ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ
ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ ،ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻔﻰ
ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻋﺎﻟ َﻢ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻰ ﻭ
ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖﻫﺴﺘﻢﻛﻪﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻰﻣﻴﺎﻥﻓﻌﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻬﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺷﻬﻮﺩﻯ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮﺕ ﺗﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻥ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻴﺘــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ
ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺩﻧﺒــﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴــﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﺑﻴﻨﺎﺫﻫﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺭﺥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻣﻄﻠﻖﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢﺭﺍﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩﻓﻌﻞﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺣﻜﻮﻣــﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮ
ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺶ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺷــﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻧﻀﻤﺎﻣﻰﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﻡﺧﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣــﺎ ﻣﻨﻀﺒﻂ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﻣﻨﺪ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕﻫﺎ ﮔﺎﻩ ﭘــﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤــﺎﻅ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺷﻬﻮﺩﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ
ﻣﻰﻛﺸﺪ.ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰﺩﺭﻓﻌﻞﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑــﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻫﻢ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺎ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘــﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺮﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺁﻧﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻋﻘﻠﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻬﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ
ﺍﻓﻼﻃﻮﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺳــﻄﻮﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄــﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺴــﺐ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺗﻌﻠﻞﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺳــﻨﺠﻰﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﺑﻴﺮ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﻗﺮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻠﻂ ،ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ،ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ؟
ﺑﻰﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ،ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ( ،ﺣﻜﻤﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ؟ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺩﺳﺖﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺣﺴــﻦ)ﻉ( ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺣــﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ
ﻭ ﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻛﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻝ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻢ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ)ﻉ( ﺷــﺪ؟ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻣﻘﻮﻻﺕ ﺳــﻪﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻜﻤﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ
ﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗــﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﺭﺥ ﻧﻤــﻰﺩﺍﺩ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻭﻗــﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ
ﻣﺪﻥﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻨﺰﻝﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺘﻤﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ
ﺍﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﭘﺲ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﺷــﺨﺼﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ
ﻳﻚ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦﺩﻭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﺩﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ
ﻓﻌﻞﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎﺳﻴﺎﻝ،ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﻌﻄﻒﺑﻪﺳﻤﺖﻳﻚﺍﺭﺯﺵﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺗﺎﺑﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ
ﺳــﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺭﺗﺒﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻘﻖﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻭﺍﻣﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻳﻚﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢﻭﺍﺑﺎﺣﻪﮔﺮﻯﺭﺍﺑﺮﻧﻤﻰﺗﺎﺑﻴﻢﻭﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢﻛﻪﻫﺪﻑ ،ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﻛﺸﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
58ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰﻛﻪﺩﺭﺟﻬﺖﺟﻨﮓﻃﻠﺒﻰﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﺷﺪ،ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻳﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻔﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﺳــﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﭙﻬﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻓﺮﺑﻪﺗــﺮﻯ ،ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰﺑﺎﺷﺪ.ﻳﻌﻨﻰﺣﺘﻰﺁﻧﺠﺎﻫﻢﺑﻪﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞﺍﻳﻦﺗﻮﺟﻪﺷﻜﻞﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻰ ﻭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖﺳﭙﻬﺮﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮﻯﻭﺟﻮﺩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪﻛﻪﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰﻭﺩﺍﻭﺭﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻤﺮﻧﮓ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﺕ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ،ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺰﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﺣﺴﺐ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺋﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻧﻀﻤﺎﻣﻰﺗﺮ ،ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯ .ﻣﻦ
ﻛﻪﺑﻪﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻭﺭﺯﻯﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏﺗﺮﻛﻤﻚﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪﻫﻢﺗﻮﺟﻪﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻬﺎﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺟﺪﻯﺗﺮ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻴــﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺣﺪﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺗﻜﺜﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ
ﻣﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻏﺎﻓﻞ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻰﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ،ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺟﺪﻯﺗﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﺍﺯﺗﻘﺪﻡﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﭘﻮﻳﺎﺗﺮ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺳﺶﮔﺮﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﺗﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺴﻰ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺝ ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴـﺖ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫـﻰ ﻭﺟـﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻠﻮﻯ
ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸـﺨﺺ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻼ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ
ﻻﻟﻪ ﺭﺷﻴﺪﻯ
ﺁﻳــﺎ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺟﺪﺍﺳــﺖ؟ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﻼﺳــﻔﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻛﻴﺎﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﻭ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺟﺪﺍﺳﺖ
ﻳﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺎﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﻣﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺩﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺳﻮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺷﻤﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺳــﭙﺎﺱ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﻴﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ -ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﺗﻖ ﻭ ﻓﺘﻖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺗﺎ ﻥ ،ﺩﺳــﺘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺮ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺭﻏﺒﺖ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ؟
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﻣﻨﻔﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮ ﺍﻣــﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ،ﺑﺮﻗــﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﻧﻈﻢ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺷــﻐﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ،
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧــﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻋــﻮﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻱ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻜﻠﻒ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻋــﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﻣﻜﻠﻒ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺍﺑﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﺸﻢ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻑ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ.
ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ،ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ،ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﺍﺟﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺎﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ ﺗﻘﺒﻴﺢ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻓﻼﺳﻔﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻓﺎﺳﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻓﺴﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ،ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺣﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﺳــﺎﺣﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸــﻤﻮﻝ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺁﻧﭽﻨــﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﻤﻊﻛﻦ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳــﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰﻣﺎﻥ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ .ﻻﺯﻣﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺣﺖ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﻄﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺣﻤﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻰ ﺑﻰﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ
ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣــﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨــﮓ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ
1
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻳﻰ ،ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﭘﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻐﺰ ﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻪ
ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ،
ﺟﺰﻣﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﺍﻧﻀﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺋﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺯ
ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﺠﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺳﻮﺍﻝ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻢﭘﺎﻯ
ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﻧﻀﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﻰ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳــﺶﻫﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧــﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﻳﮕﺎﻧﮕﻰ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﺍﻯ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌﺎﻥ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﮕﻰ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺟﻤﻌﻰ .ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻔﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﺼﻴﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻓﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻨﺠﺰ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻰ
ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺪﻩ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻏﺎﻳﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ،ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ
ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎ ،ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﻴﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﮔﻴﺘﻰ ،ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻢ ﺯﻳﺴــﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘــﺮﺍﻡ ﺗﻚﺗﻚ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻏﺎﻳﺎﺗﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﻳﻦ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻐﺮﻧﺞ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﮕﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘــﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺷــﺨﺼﻰ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻــﻲﺍﺵ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻓــﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ
3
ﻓــﺮﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺯﻳﺴــﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭘﺲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﺣﺖ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ
ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻄﻮﺡ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ
ﻏﻴــﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻜﺲ ،ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻏﻴــﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔــﻰ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ
ﺷﺨﺼﻰﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ
ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﻣﺬﻣﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻧﺎﭘﺴﻨﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﭘﺴﻨﺪﻯ ﻣﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺧﻴﺮ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻧﻴﺮﻧﮓ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺷــﻤﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﻰ ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ
ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻡ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺳــﺨﻦﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺷﺮﻁ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻭ
ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻯﺗﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﻋﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺎﺏ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﺩﺳﺖﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ،ﺟﺎ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ.
ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻮﺷــﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ
ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺘﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﻜﻦ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ .ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ،ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ
ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻡ
ﺩﺭﺁﻳــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻴــﺎﻭﺭﺩ .ﻭﻯ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ
»ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻼﻳﻰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ« ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ» :ﻫــﺮ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺣــﻖ ،ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺟﺪ ﺻﻔﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻴﺖ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ« ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
2
75
ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺭﻧﺠﺒﺮ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻗﻢ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧــﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﭘﻴﻮﻧــﺪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻲ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ؟ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ،ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺏ
ﻭ ﺑﺪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺭﻏﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ،ﻫﺮ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ؛ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﺑﻌﻀﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺑﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﺑﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺎﺏ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺷﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺪﺍ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ،ﺗﺨﻠﻖ ﻣﺆﻣﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻧﻴﻚ ﻭ ﭘﺴﻨﺪﻳﺪﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ
ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﭼﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ
ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﺑﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﻭﺟﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ...ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻨﺠﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻕ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻧﺴﺒﻴﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ .ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺒﺢ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ،ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺣﺴــﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺒﺢ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺟﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺋﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﻨﺪ .ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ:
ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺑﺪ )ﺣﺴﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺒﺢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ( ﺩﻭ ﺻﻔﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ
ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺻــﺎﺩﺭ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻋﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌــﻞ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺒﻨــﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺑــﺪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻫــﻢ ﺟﻬﺎﻥﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ :ﻫﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻭﻻ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥﺑﻴﻨــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ؛ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺳﺮﭼﺸــﻤﻪ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ،
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ،ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ
76
ﺑﺪ ،ﺣﺴﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺒﺢ.
ﻋﻼﻣﻪ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥﺑﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﺩﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺮﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻧﺴﺒﻲﺍﻧﺪ:
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﻈــﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺒﺢ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴﺎ ﺻﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﺴــﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺒﻴﺢ ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﻓﻀﺎﻳــﻞ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺫﺍﻳﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﻳﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺍﺻﻞ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻞ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﻌﻞ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﻳﻖ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺣﺴــﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺒﺢ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺑﺤﺜﻲ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺫﺍﺗﺎ
ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺫﺍﺗﺎ ﺑﺪﻧــﺪ.ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﻌﺎﻝ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻲ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ،ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﭼﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ؟
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ،ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻱ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﻭ
ﺑﻪﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻞ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺫﺍﻳﻞ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﻫﺪﻑ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ
ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺑﻪﻃــﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺑﺪ
ﺍﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺑﺪ ﺍﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﺟﺴﺖ
ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖ ﻛﺮﺩ؟ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺟﺰ ﺭﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻫﺪﻓﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ،
ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻲﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻲ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﻢﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻣﺎﻧﻮﺋﻞ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ،
ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻱ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﺪﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻋﺎﺩﻻﻧﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﻌﻜﻮﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ،
ﻫﺪﻑ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ« ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ:
ﺭﻭﺵ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ .ﻫﻢ
ﺭﻭﺵ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ
ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻱ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺭﻭﺵ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻱ ﭼــﻮﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ،
ﺭﻭﺵ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺁﻥ ،ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺘﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ
ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ
ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻫﻢ ،ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻭ
ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﺭﻭﺵ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﻣﻼﺯﻡ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺗﻌﻬﺪ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺮ
ﻋﻤﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻭﺭﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ،
ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ
ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺮﭘﺎ ﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺷــﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﻮﻉ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ،ﻧﻔﻲ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ.
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ،ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻓﻲ ﻧﻔﺴــﻪ ﻭ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﻓﻌﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﺑﺎ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺠﺶ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ.
ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﺠﻮﻳﺰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ،
ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻜﺘﺐﻫﺎ ،ﻃﻴﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺷــﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈــﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﭼﻪﺑﺴﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻌﺎﻟﻲ
ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﻓﻼﻃﻮﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻓﺮﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ،
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎﻛﺲ ﻭﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ »ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ«
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ( ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻣﻜﺘــﺐ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ
ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻔــﺎﻭﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺿﻴــﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﻱ ،ﻣﺮﺩ
ﺁﻥ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺎﺏ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻃﻴﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻲﺍﺵ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ،
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﻗﻴﺒﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﻴﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻭﺑﺮ ﻋﺪﻡ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻮﻣــﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺑﻲﻗﻴــﺪﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺑﻨﺪﻭﺑﺎﺭﻱ
ﻃﻴﻒﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮﺭﺍ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻠﻘﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺎﻛﺲ ﻭﺑﺮ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ،
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﻲﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ« ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ،ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ،ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ،
ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ،ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺯﻳﺮﭘﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧــﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ 8ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻠﻘﻲﺍﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻧﺸــﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻭﺑﺮ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺗﻌــﺎﺭﺽ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻋﺪﻡ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ،ﺑﺮﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﺸــﺮﻱ، ،ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻭﺭﺯﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .
ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺎﻛﺲ ﻭﺑﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻧﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﺎﻳﻞ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻛﺴــﺐ ،ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ »ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ« ،ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ
ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻛﻴﺎﻭﻟﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻴﭽﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔــﻲ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺳــﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻛﺲ ﻭﺑﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺻــﻮﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺣــﻜﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑــﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻋﻤﻠﻜــﺮﺩ ﺿﺪﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻳﻚ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣــﻲ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺁﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻓــﺮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧــﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ،
ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑــﺎ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺿﺪﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﺭ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗــﻲ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﺒﺪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﺸﺮﻱ، ،ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔــﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﻄﻮﺡ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ
ﻣﻤﻜــﻦ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺲ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ
ﺷــﺨﺼﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﭘﺮﺳــﺘﺶ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻣﺴﺘﺜﻨﺎ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ »ﻓﺮﻩ ﺍﻳﺰﺩﻱ« ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﺖ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ
ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻭ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻓ ّﺮ ﺍﻳﺰﺩﻱ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺻﺎﻑ
ﻭﺑﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻟﺰﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻜﻤﻞ ﻫﻢ
ﺳﻨﺖ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ،ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ،ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎﻛﻴﺎﻭﻟﻲ ،ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ،ﻟﺰﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﻣﺎﻛﻴﺎﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺘﺶ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ،
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺮﻳﺢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺭﺣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺑﺮ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺭﺳﺘﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﻭﺣﻲ
ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؛ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻳﻤــﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ،ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ
ﭘﺮﺳــﺶ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ :ﻣﮕﺮ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﻭ
ﺭﺳﺘﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﻭﺣﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ،ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺖ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊﺑﻴﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺫﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﺨﻦ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ
-1ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺘﻤﮕﺮﻱ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺟﺰ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
-2ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ( ﻣﺘﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ( ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺫﺍﺕ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒــﺎ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺣﻀــﺮﺕ ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ( ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺟﻮﻳﻲ ﻏﺎﻓﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺟﻮﻳﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﻌﻘﻴﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺟﻮ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺭﺯﺷــﻲ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻋﻠﻮﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ(
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﻣﺖ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﺑﺮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ،ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ( ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﺍﺵ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ( ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺣﻖﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺣﻀﺮﺕ،
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑــﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻈﺮﺷﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳــﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ( ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴــﻚ ﺗﻌﻘﻴﺐ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ
ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ
ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺯﻣﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﻭ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺩﻧﻴﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺮﻭﻱ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﻬﺞﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺳﻮﺩﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ:
ﭘﺲﺍﮔﺮﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭﺍﺯﺗﻌﺼﺐﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ،ﻋﺼﺒﻴﺖﺧﻮﺩﺭﺍﺑﺮﺍﻱﺍﺧﻼﻕﻧﻴﻜﻮ
ﻭ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺴــﻨﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ
ﻭ ﺑﺰﺭگﻣﻨﺶ ﻋﺮﺏ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳــﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺻﻮﻑ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ؛ ﺗﻌﺼﺐ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦﺍﺧﻼﻕﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏﻋﻘﻼﻭﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱﺑﺰﺭگﻭﺩﺭﺟﺎﺕﺑﺎﻻﻱﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ
ﻭﺁﺛﺎﺭﭘﺴﻨﺪﻳﺪﻩﻛﻪﺍﺯﺧﻮﺩﺑﻪﻳﺎﺩﮔﺎﺭﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.ﭘﺲﺗﻌﺼﺐﺑﻮﺭﺯﻳﺪﺑﻪ
ﺧﺼﻠﺖﻫﺎﻭﻋﺎﺩﺍﺕﭘﺴﻨﺪﻳﺪﻩﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻭﺣﻔﻆﺣﻘﻮﻕﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻲ
ﻭ ﻭﻓﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻃﺎﻋﺖ ﻧﻴﻜﻮﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﻓﻀﻞﻭﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖﻭﺑﺰﺭگﺷﻤﺮﺩﻥﻣﻌﺼﻴﺖﻗﺘﻞﻧﻔﺲﻭﺍﻧﺼﺎﻑﺑﻪﺧﻠﻖﻭ
ﻓﺮﻭﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻏﻀﺐ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ .
77
ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﻓﺎﺿﻠﻪ ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪﻧﺼﻴﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﮕﺮﺍ
ﺳﻴﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﻣﻴﺮﺧﻠﻴﻠﻰ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ :ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻌﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﺼﺎﺭ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻭﺛﻴﻖ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ،
ﭘﺎﺭﺍﺩﺍﻳﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺶﻭﺭﺯﺍﻥ
ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﺩﺍﻳﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻨﺠﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ،
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ،ﺗﺎﻟﻴﻒ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﺳــﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻛﺎﻇﻤﻰ )ﻧﺸﺮ ﻗﻮﻣﺲ(1376 ،
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻣﺘﻜﻔﻞ ﺑﺤــﺚ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺎﻣــﻞ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻼﻓﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﺍﺩﻑ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻨﺸﺎ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﻪﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﭼﻨﺎﻥ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻪ ﺷــﺮﻳﻔﻪ 165ﺳــﻮﺭﻩ ﺑﻘﺮﻩ؛ ﺍﻥﺍﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﷲ
ﺟﻤﻴﻌﺎ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ،ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺼﺒﻰ ﺟﺰ ﺑﺎﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻭ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ :ﻻﻗﻮﻩ
ﺍﻻﺑﺎﷲ .ﺑــﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ
ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻫﺒﺖ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ
ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺁﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﻼﻡﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ،
ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺍﺟﺪ ﺧﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻋﻘﻠﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴــﺖ؛
ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ،ﺳــﻪ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ:
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﺪﻥ ،ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺰﻝ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ؛ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴــﺎﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ،ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺪﻥ ،ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴــﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ،ﺁﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ،ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺟﺪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ،ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺧﻄﺒﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ( ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺷﺮﻳﻒ ﻧﻬﺞﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺘﺐ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﺻﺤﻴﻔﻪ ﺳــﺠﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺯﻳﻦﺍﻟﻌﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ)ﻉ( ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ( ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ
ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ،ﺑﻴﻨﺶ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﻻ ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ( ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ(،
ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺍﺷﺘﺮ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺰﻟﻪ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸــﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ( ،ﻭﻓﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ
ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥﺷــﻜﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻋﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻧﮓ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ،
ﺗﻮﺳــﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ،ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻟﻬﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻳﺎ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﻣﺬﻣﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺮﻭﺩ ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ
78
ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻓﺎﺭﻍ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺋﻤﻪﺍﻃﻬﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺮﻩ
ﻋﻤﻠﻰﺷــﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ؛
ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻰ ،ﻣﺴــﻜﻮﻳﻪ ،ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻰ،
ﻋﺎﻣﺮﻯ ،ﻏﺰﺍﻟﻰ ،ﺍﺑﻦﺳﻴﻨﺎ ،ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﺼﻴﺮ ،ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﺳﺒﺰﻭﺍﺭﻯ ،ﻧﺮﺍﻗﻰ ﻭ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﻭ ...ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺑﻦﺧﻠﺪﻭﻥ :ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﻯ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻇﺎﻟﻢ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺳــﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﺒﺪ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺨﺘﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﺎﻫﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ،
ﭼــﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺍﻭ :ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻠــﻰ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻠﻮﻛﻬﻢ؛ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻳﻦ
ﺣﺎﻛﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻏﺰﺍﻟـﻰ :ﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨــﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻭ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻭ
ﺷــﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺩﻧﻴﻮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﺧﺮﻭﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻏﺰﺍﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻜﺒﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﻋﻴﺖ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺷﻬﻮﺕ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻗﻨﺎﻋﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻣﺸﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ
ﻭ ﺳــﺨﺘﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﻯ ﺟﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺷﺮﻉ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ،ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻭ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻰ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﺰﺍﺝ ﻭ ﻃﺒﺎﻳﻊ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻰ :ﻭﻯ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺗﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻰ ،ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ -ﺷﺎﻩ
ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺷﺎﻫﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﺸــﻬﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﺖ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻰ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ،ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﻓﺎﺿﻠﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.
ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻰ ،ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ
ﻓﺎﺳــﻘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﻬﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺤــﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻰ ،ﻧﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﺪﻳﻨــﻪ ﻓﺎﺿﻠﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻰ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻮ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻯ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺍﻩ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ،
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻣﺪﻧﻰ
ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺑﻦﻣﺴـﻜﻮﻳﻪ :ﺑﻪ ﺑــﺎﻭﺭ ﻭﻯ ،ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﺪﻧﻰ
ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ،ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺳــﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢﻧﻮﻋﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﻜﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻰ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺳــﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮﻳﻪ ،ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻫﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺷــﻪﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ،
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻋﻔﺖ ،ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﺧﺼﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ
ﺑﺪ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ،ﻓﺮﺻﺖ
ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻭ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻣﻨﺰﻭﻯ،
ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻃﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻛــﺮﺩﺍﺭ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﻫﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻰﻭﺟﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ،ﻣﺴﻜﻮﻳﻪ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺷﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﻈﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ
ﻣﻲﭘﻨــﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮﻳﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﻣﻔﻬــﻮﻡ ﺍﻓﻼﻃﻮﻧﻰ
ﺳــﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺭﺳــﻄﻮﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺣﺼﻮﻝ ﺳــﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﺪﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺟﺴﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ ﻋﺎﻣﺮﻯ :ﻭﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺳﻨﺖ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺒﺎﭼﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﺸﻬﺮﻯ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻭ ،ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺘﻰ ﻣﺪﻧﻰ ،ﺧﻂ
ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺶﻭﺭﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ
ﺩﺭﻙ ﻋﻘﻠﻰ ﻳﺎ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻬﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﻭﻯ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﻭ
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﺑﻦﺳﻴﻨﺎ :ﻭﻯ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﺷﻔﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺒﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺖ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﺍﺑﻦﺳﻴﻨﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺳﻠﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﺖ،
ﻋﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺴــﻦ ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺖ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺗﻌﻠﻖ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ،ﺍﺑﻦﺳﻴﻨﺎ ،ﺑﺤﺚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻓﺮﻋﻰ
ﻧﺒﻮﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺧﻮﺍﺟﻪﻧﺼﻴﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺳـﻰ :ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘــﺎﻡ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻼﻙﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻒ ﺑﻮﺩ.
www.mosalas.ir
–IµT]H
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺳﺮﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻧﺶ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻧﺸــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻚ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
79
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ 18ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ!
ﻫﻮﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻯ
ﺍﻇﻬــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧــﻰ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ،
ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺣﻮﻝﻭﺣﻮﺵ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﺎﺯ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ،ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﺳﻜﺎﻥﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ ،ﻣﺘــﻦ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖﻧﺸــﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﻴﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ 20
ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ،ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺒﻮﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪﺍﻯ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪﭼﻴﻨﻰ ﻭ
ﻳﻜﻰ ،ﺩﻭ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻰﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺻﺎﻑ ﻭ ﭘﻮﺳﺖﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
–ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ -ﺑﺮﻭﺩ .ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺴﻮ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻯ
ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ 8ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻭ 42/5ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺕ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﺎ 40ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﺯ 65ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
85ﺑﻪ 105ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 88ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ ﺷﺪ،
ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺳــﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑــﺎ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﻭ 500ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ،ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﺴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
80
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﻰ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﻮﺭﻳﻞ ﻭ ﻗﻄﺎﺭﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻋﺪﺍﺩ
ﻭ ﺍﺭﻗﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﺨﻤﻴﻦ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻫــﺮ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻓﻨﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻭ ...ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻃﺮﺯ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﻰ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺳﻮءﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﻓﻨﻰ
ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ 30»:ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺴــﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻦﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻧﻞﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻳﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻔﺖ ﺧﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ...ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ
ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺯﺍﻱ
ﻫﺮ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺼﻒ ﻣﺘﺮﻭﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺳــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺰﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ
ﺫﻱﺭﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﻌﺪﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ
ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺣﺘﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺷﻬﺮﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺗﺮﺍﻓﻴﻚ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﻣــﺎ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﻳﻢ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺎ
95ﺗﺎ 96ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻇﺮﻑ ﺩﻭﺗﺎﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ
ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜﻼ 1500
ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﭘــﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴــﺪ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻗﻄﺎﺭﺵ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺧﺐ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺧﺘﻴﻢ ،ﻗﻄﺎﺭﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﺮﻳﺪﻳــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻴﻢ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺯﻭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ،
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ...ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳــﻲ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻧﺘﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺣﺘﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺖﻭﺳﺎﺯ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻢﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖﻭﺳــﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺗﻮﻧــﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻩ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣــﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﭼﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ
ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﻭ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ 2/2
ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺟــﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ 250ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻋــﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
2/2ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ 4/4ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢ 250ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ 60ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺯﻳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ
10ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫــﺮ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ 60ﺗﺎ
70ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣــﺎﻥ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻴﻠــﻲ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ
50ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣــﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻧﺘﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
15ﺗﺎ 20ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕﺩﺭﺟﻪﻳﻚﺩﻧﻴﺎﻧﻴﺴﺖﻭﻟﺬﺍﺣﺪﻭﺩﻫﻤﻴﻦ
60ﺍﻟــﻲ 70ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﺭﻭﺯ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻳﻚﺟﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﻄﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 400ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
100ﻳﺎ 33ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ،
ﭼﻪ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﻧﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﺮ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ،ﺳﺴــﺖ ﺑــﻮﺩﻥ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺎﻟﻰ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ
ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺑــﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﺻﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻧﻤﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ .ﻓﻮﺍﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ ،ﺳــﺮﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﻮﺯ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻭﻗﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ» :ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻠﺴــﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﺡ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺷﺶ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺭﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳــﻰ ﻋﻤــﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻯ
ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻰ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻣﻨﻮﺭﻳﻞ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻤﺘــﺮ ﺍﺯ 10ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮﻯ ﺳــﻪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺶ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮﻯ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 100
ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻋــﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﻮﺭﻳﻞ ﻧﺼﻒ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺒﻠﻎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ
ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘــﺮﻯ 33ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺳــﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻣﻨﻮﺭﻳﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺳﻪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ
50ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ 16ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖﻛﻢ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻇﻬــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘــﺮﻯ 50ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ )ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ 1/5ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ( ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻪ ﺳﻪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠــﻒ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﻣﻨﻮﺭﻳﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ 150ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ
ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﺭﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴــﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻰ
ﻳﻚ ﺧﻂ ﻣﻨﻮﺭﻳﻞ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﻣﺎﻓﻴﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﻮﺭﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻳﺎ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻢ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺑﻰﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺨﻦ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ،
ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ
ﺗﺮﺍﻓﻴﻚ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﺍﻓﻴﻚ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ ،ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺒﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻣﻨﻮﺭﻳﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ«.
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ 18ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺒــﺮﻯ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻗــﺎﻡ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ:
» ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ
ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﻣﺘﺮﻭﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ
ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺑﻪﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ
ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻗﻄﺮ 14ﻣﺘﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻗﻄﺮ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ 8ﻣﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 154ﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﻭ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 50ﻣﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚﺳــﻮﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ
ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻳــﻚ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚﺳــﻮﻡ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻗﻄﻌﺎ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ
ﻳــﻚ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ 10ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧــﻪ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﺒﻠﻐﻰ ﻛﻤﺘــﺮ ﺍﺯ 10ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ 60ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ 14ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺳﺖﻛﻢ ﺳﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺪﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
42ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 30ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ 12ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ
ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﺎﻗــﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ،ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺷــﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻳﻚﺳﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
18ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺁﻣﺎﺭﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
ﺍﺯ 14ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﻯ 200ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺜﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪ،
ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ؛ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ – ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯﺍﺵ -ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻮﻟﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻳﻊﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥﺗﺮ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ
ﺯﻳﺮﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴــﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ
ﻛﻤﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 100ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 600ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺷــﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﭼﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﻠﻎ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺟﻤــﻊ ﺑﺰﻧﻴﺪ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ
800ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ «.ﻭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺳﻪ ﺗﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻪ ﺗﻴﻜﻪ 14ﺗﺎ 15ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﻦ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ
ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﻗﻔﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ 14ﺗﺎ 15ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻭ 42/5ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺕ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﻃﻮﻝ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﺎ
40ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘــﺮ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳــﺶ ﺍﺯ 65ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘــﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 85ﺑﻪ 105
ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 88ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺸﻰ ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﺑﺮ 26ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ 35ﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 84
ﺑﻪ 61ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 88ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﻬﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻣﺘﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ
ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 1/7ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ،
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﮔﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻰ
ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ 30ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﻇﺮﻓﻴــﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻂ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺮﺍﻫــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ 1800ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﻧﻘﻠﻴﻪ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﺗﻚﺳﺮﻧﺸــﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺑﻪ 60ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ ﻭ ﻇﺮﻓﻴــﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ 33ﺧﻂ ﻋﺒﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ 120
ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ 150ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ
ﺳﻔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻠﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣــﺮﺯ 2/4ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ
ﻧﻔﺮ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﺟﻮﻳﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﻫﺴــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺭﻭﺍ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ »ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺟﻬﺖ
ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﺍﻓﻴﻚ ﻋﺬﺍﺏ ﺑﻜﺸــﻨﺪ« ﻭ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﺍﻓﻴﻚ ﺳﺮﺳــﺎﻡﺁﻭﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﻓﺮﺳﻮﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺡﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ
ﺧﺮﺍﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ.
81
ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﺣﺴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻰﻧﻴﺎ
ﻧﺎﻳﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ
ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗــﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳــﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻞ 44
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻪ
ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﻻﻳــﻞ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﺩ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﭼﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺭﺍﻩ ﺣﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺗﺼﺪﻯﮔﺮﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﭘﻴﺶﺭﻭ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺣﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺳﺮﻭﻳﺲﺩﻫﻰ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺒــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻣــﻞ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻫﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ
ﻣﻠﻰ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﮔﻔﺘــﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻰ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺘــﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺳﺮﻭﻳﺲﺩﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺳــﻔﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
82
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻘﻴﻤﻰ:
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﭼﻪﻛﺎﺭ؟!
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺘـﺮﻭ ،ﮔﻮﻳـﺎ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻓﻌﻼ
ﻓﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺨﻄﺎﺏ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ.
ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻫـﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨـﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑـﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺷـﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ ،ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ
ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺑﺎﻧـﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤـﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭘﺎ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳـﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﺎﻗﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻘﻴﻤﻰ،
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﻣﻘﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﻡ
ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺷـﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻫﻰ ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺑـﻮﺩ .ﻣﻘﻴﻤﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷـﻬﺮﻯ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭﺑـﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺷـﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺳـﺮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔـﻮ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴـﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷـﻬﺮﻯ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺩ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺴﻮﺯﺩ!
ﮔﻮﻳﺎﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕﻣﺘﺮﻭﺑﺎﺣﻀﻮﺭﺁﻗﺎﻯﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩﺩﺭﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻭﺩﻯﻫﺎ ﺣﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﺶ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺷـﻨﺒﻪ 20 ،ﺁﺑﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ.
ﭘــﺮﻭژﻩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﺳــﺖ .ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺧﻂ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ
ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺠﺎﻯ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﺘﺮﻭﻳﻰ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬــﺎﺭ ﺧﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ،ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻂ
ﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺩﻭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭘﻮﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻰﭘﻮﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺳــﻪ ،ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺑﻘﻴــﻪ ﺧﻂﻫﺎ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ
ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟــﺮﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ 82
ﻭ 83ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺍﺟــﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭ ﺧــﻂ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
2/5ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﻓﺎﻳﻨﺎﻧﺲ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪﺩﻻﻳﻠﻰ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺳــﺎﻝ 86ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ،ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺷﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺮ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﻭﻥﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ 87
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ 1800 ،ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﻯ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﻫﻢ 1300ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ 30ﺗﺎ 40ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ 87ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﻭﺍﻡ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭﺍﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺩ 1/5ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﻭﺍﻡ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﺍﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ،ﻫﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺑﻦﺑﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﭼﻬــﺎﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
75ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ 90ﺑﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ 30ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻔﺖ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺍﻯ
ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ .ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻞ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ،ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺁﻣﺪ
ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﺭﻓﺖ
ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 3ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺣﻮﻣﻪ
ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺷــﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 85ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 9ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘــﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﺳــﺖ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ،ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻭ
ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳــﻰ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 4
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﺎ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ
ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘــﻞ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺳــﻨﻮﺍﺗﻰ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ
ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻫﻢ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﺪﻯﮔﺮﻯ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻛﻠﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﺸــﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺳﺮ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ!
ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺣﺮﻑ
ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ،ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﻫﻢ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ،ﺩﺭﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺳـﻢ ﭼﻨﻴـﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔـﺖ ﺑـﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻔﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺧﺐ ﻓﺮﻗﻰ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺁﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩﺁﻫﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺸـﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎﺳﺖ؟
ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﻭﺳــﻴﻊ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﮕﺮﺩﻳــﻢ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻌﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻫﻨﮕﻔﺘﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻓﻼﻥ ﻣﺸـﻜﻞ ﺑـﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺣﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧــﺎﺭﺝ ﭘﺮﺗﻘﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻳــﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺘﺮ ﺭﻳﻞ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﻳﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﭘﺮﺗﻘﺎﻝ ﻛﺠﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﮕﺮﺩﺩ .ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ،ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﻭﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺳــﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻣﺸﻬﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 83
ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﮔﻦ ﻭ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﺑﺨﺮﻳﻢ .ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻴﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻮﻟﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ
ﺑﺪﻫﺪ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ 75ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﺭﻭﻥﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ
75ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺧﻂ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺳــﺎﺯﺩ ،ﺑﻘﻴﻪ
ﻛﻼﻧﺸﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﻋﺪﻡ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺳـﻬﻤﻴﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻭ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳﻬﻢ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ .ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﺮ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ
ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ
8ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﮕﻮ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ،ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛــﻢ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ؟
ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳــﻰ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ
ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ،ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ
ﺑﺮﻭ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻮﺭﻳﻞ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻛﻦ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻻﻳﺤﻪﺍﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ،44ﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻠﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ 136
ﻭ 137ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺴــﻤﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻫﺪﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ 22ﺗﺎ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ.
ﺍﮔـﺮ ﭼﻨﻴـﻦ ﻻﻳﺤـﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺑﻴﺎﻳـﺪ ،ﻣﺠﻠـﺲ ﺭﺍﻯ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻗﺴــﻢ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ .ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﻭ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﻃﻼﻳﻰ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺤــﺚ ﻭﺍﮔــﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻞ
44ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺟﻬــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺻــﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷــﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺑﺮﮔﺸــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﺒﻨﻰﺑﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳــﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﺎﺕ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺤﺜﻲ ﺟﺪﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧــﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻰ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻪﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ.
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺳﻮﺧﺖ
ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ
ﺷــﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻞ
ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺰﺩﻩ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﺗﺒﺼﺮﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻳﻜﺸﻨﺒﻪ ﻫﺠﺪﻫﻢ
ﺁﺫﺭﻣﺎﻩ ﻳﻜﻬﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺼﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺶ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳــﺐ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳــﺦ 1386/9/28ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻬﺎﻡ
ﺭﺍﻩﺁﻫﻦ ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻔﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ
ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ.
ﻋــﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳــﻦ ،ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻋﻀــﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻤــﻊ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ* ﻭ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺷــﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺴــﺘﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﻰ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ
ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
* ﺍﻋﻀـﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻤـﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺷـﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺁﻫـﻦ ﺷـﻬﺮﻯ
ﺗﻬـﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻮﻣـﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺷـﺎﻣﻞ ﺷـﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑـﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ،ﺳـﻪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸـﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺷـﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﺎﻗﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒـﺎﻑ ،ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﻃﻼﻳﻰ ،ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ
ﻓﺮﻭﺯﺵ )ﻋﻀﻮ ﺳـﺎﺑﻖ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ( ،ﺭﺳﺘﻢ ﻗﺎﺳﻤﻲ )ﺍﺯ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺧﺎﺗﻢ ﺍﻻﻧﺒﻴﺎ( ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
83
ﻗﺪﺭﺕﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﺨﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ:
ﻣﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷـﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻰ
ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳـﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺣـﺎﻻ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﺎﻻ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺮﻭﺻﺪﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻣﺤﻤـﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳـﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ 20ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺳـﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ
ﻣﺘـﺮﻭ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳـﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ.ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﺎﻝ 82ﺗﺎ 84ﺷـﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ
ﺗﻬـﺮﺍﻥ ﺑـﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺟﺎﻟﺒـﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧـﻰ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﺑﻨـﺪﻩ ﺧﺎﺩﻡ ﻣـﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ،ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻢ
ﭼﻴﺴـﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﭘﺸـﺖ ﺑﻮﻟﺪﻭﺯﺭ ﻭ ﻟﻮﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺸﺴـﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛـﺮﺩﻡ ،ﻟﻮﺩﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻟﺪﻭﺯﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳـﻢ ،ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﻢ «.ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﻗـﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺴـﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛـﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺷـﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﮕﻴـﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺨﺶﻫـﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻰ ﭼـﻮﻥ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ،ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ،ﺁﺏ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻕ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﻭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ.ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘـﺮﻭ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺨﺼﻴﺺ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷـﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻛﻢﺳـﺎﺑﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺮﻭﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﺍﻯ
ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺎ
ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ؛ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨـﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﻗـﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﺨﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻋﻀﻮ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺷـﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻋﻮﺍ
ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﺨﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺟﺪﻳـﺪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
84
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺷﻜﻨﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ .ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ،ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻢ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﺳـﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؛ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻫﻢ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ!
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ
ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻬﺎﻡ ﺭﺍﻩﺁﻫﻦ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻔﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻤﻊﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ.
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﻯ
ﻭ ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ 22ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1385ﺑــﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻢ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﺤﺖﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻻﻳﺤــﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﻭ
ﺣﻮﻣــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ 21ﻣﻬﺮﻣﺎﻩ 83ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
17ﻣــﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻗﻴﺪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ
ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ ﺷــﻬﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺣﻮﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﻥ،
ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺫﻯﺭﺑﻂ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺺ
ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺁﻗـﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧـﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﺍﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺳـﺮﻋﺖ ﺑﺒﺨﺸـﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴـﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘــﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ
ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﻘﻒ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ ﺩﺭﻭﻥﺷﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺳﻨﻮﺍﺗﻰ
ﻛﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﻳﻠــﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻘــﺎﻕ ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺘــﺮﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻛﻢﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭘﺲ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ؟
ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ،ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺨﺼﻴﺺ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﺩﻭ ﻓﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻃﺮﺣﻰ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺷــﻮﺩ
ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻣــﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻋﻮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺮﺑﺎﺳــﭽﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻰﻛــﺮﺩﻡ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑــﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺷــﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺑﺎﺳــﭽﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺜﺒﺘــﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﭼــﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ،
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻟﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪﻣــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﺵ ﺩﻫﺎﻥﺳــﻮﺯﻯ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺴــﻦ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭘﻨﺞﺑــﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒــﺎﻑ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺛــﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻲﺷﻚ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺿﺮﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﺭﻭﻥﺷﻬﺮﻱﺷــﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﻣﻰﻃﻠﺒﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺯﻳﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﻌــﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺗﺨﺼﻴﺺ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻓﻮﺍﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻰ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 54ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﻣﻠﻰ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ
ﺳﻮﻓﺮﺗﻮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺗﺮﺍﻓﻴﻚ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ،
ﺑﻪﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ
ﺯﻳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻃﻰ ﺳــﻪ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ
2/5ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻛــﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻭﻗﻔﻪﺍﻯ ﻫﺸــﺖ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ
ﺷﺪ .ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 65ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﻀﺎﺭﺑﻪﺍﻯ ﻳﺎ
ﻭﺍﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﻧﻜﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻰ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻞ ﻭﺍﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﻧﻜﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ.
ﻃﻰ 13ﺳﺎﻝ )ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 66ﺗﺎ (79ﻓﻘﻂ ﻫﺸﺖ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺯﻳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻭﺩﺍﺭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻧﻜﻰ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭﺍﻡ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺷﺖ 11 .ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤــﻰ ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 77ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ ،79ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻋﻄﻔﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪﺍﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯﺷﻬﺮ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺑﺪﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮ
ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ،ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺳﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﻟﻰ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻠﻰ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣــﺪﻝ ﻛﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫــﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ،ﭼــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﭼﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯﺷــﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻜﻢﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﺭﺯﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺭﻳﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳــﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪ؛
ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ،ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ
ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺭﻳﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 85ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺳﻮﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ؛
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻤﻠﮕﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ 138ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ
ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺗﻀﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎﺕ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ
ﺭﻭﺵ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﺯ
ﻫﻢ ﻛﻔﻪ ﺗﺮﺍﺯﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 58ﺗﺎ 79
ﻓﻘﻂ ﻫﺸــﺖ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺯﻳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻰ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺴﺎﺏ
30ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺧﻂ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ 38ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﺣﺴﺎﺏ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 79ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻰ 70ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺴــﺎﺏ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 10ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ ،ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ 9ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﺑﺮ 80ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ 9ﺳﺎﻝ ،ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
11ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﺴﺒﺘﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ ،ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ
ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ 9ﺳﺎﻝ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻯﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺩﺭ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ 330ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ
ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ 20ﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ )ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ
60ﺗﺎ ،(80ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻧﺸــﺪ ،ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﭼﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺰﻭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ 600ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺨﺼﻴﺺ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﻛﺪﺍ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺸﺮ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺑﻪﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﻗﺸﺮ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻭ ﺁﺳــﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺭﻳﺰﺩ .ﻣﮕﺮ
ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻮﺑﻮﺱ ﺟــﺰﻭ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬــﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮﻧﻤﻰﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻫﺪ؟
ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻞ
ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻯ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﻣﻰﻛﻮﺑﻨﺪ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﻳﻦﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻛﺸــﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ
ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ 30ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ
ﻣﺸﻬﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ 20ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪﺍﻯ
ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﭼﻨﺪﺳﺎﻋﺘﻰ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﻗﻄﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﻧﺪ.
)ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻗﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ 20ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﻳﻨﻚ 12ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ(.ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺿﻤﻦ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻏﺎﻓﻞ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺴﻮ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ 1/5ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮ
ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺳﻮء ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ
ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻃﺮﺣﻰ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻧﺸﺪﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻃﺮﺣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻳــﻚ ﻓﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣــﺎﻩ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻦ ﻋﻠﻨــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺘــﺮﻭ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﺭﺯﻯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﻭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ.
85
ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺣﺎﺟﻴﺎﻥ
ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺁﺭﺵ ﻋﺮﺏ ﻳﺎﺭﻣﺤﻤﺪﻯ
ﺑﺎ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻢ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺧﺒــﺎﺭ ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺟﻴﺎﻥ
ﺭﻧﮓ ﻭ ﺑــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴــﺰ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺳﻨﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺻﺪﻫﺎ
ﻫــﺰﺍﺭ ﺯﺍﺋﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﺍﺳــﺮ ﺟﻬــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴــﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﺻﺤﺮﺍﻯ
ﺣﺠﺎﺯ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﻳﻀﻪ ﺣﺞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺳــﺎﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﻨﺖ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﻣﻰﻧﺸﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭﺣﺪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ،ﭘﻮﺷــﺶ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺑﭙﻮﺷﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮ ﺑﻜﺸــﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺍﻋﺘــﺮﺍﻑ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺞ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻯ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﺸﺪﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ 90ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥﻫﺎ )ﺗﺎ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺗﻨﻈﻴــﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ(
ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺣﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺞ
ﺣﺎﺟﻴــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪﻣﺘــﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻰﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﺶﻫــﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﺯﺍﺋﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺞ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ؛
ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻓﻘــﻂ ﺯﻣﺰﻣﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻌﺘﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻔﺮ
ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﺳــﺨﺘﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﺳﺮ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ
ﻗﺮﺹ ﻛﺪﺋﻴﻦ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺭﻭ ﺁﻥﻭﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻫﺸــﺪﺍﺭ
ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺞ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺞ ﺑﺴﭙﺎﺭﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴــﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﺟﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ
ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ – ﺣﺘﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ
ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ -ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ
ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﺘﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
» 92ﺯﺍﺋــﺮ ﺣﺞ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻛﻴﻠﻮ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﻴﺮ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ« .ﺍﻳﻦ
86
ﺗﻴﺘﺮ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ
ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﺩﻭ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﺠﺎﺝ ﻛﺸــﻒ ﻭ ﺿﺒﻂ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ «.ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﺳﻰ ﺑﻌﺜﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻰ
ﻭﺟﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺩ ﭘﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ
ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ،ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺞ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﺟﺪﻯ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺞ ﻣﺒﻨﻰﺑﺮ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ،
ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺍﺋﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﻣﻨﻮﺭﻩ
ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖﺷــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ
ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ «.ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺗﻌــﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺯﺍﺋﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨــﺪﺭ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺯﻋﻢ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﺳــﻌﻮﺩﻯ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ
ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖﺷﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻋﻤﺮﻩ ﻣﻔﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ» .ﻋﻤﺪﻩ
ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮﺷﺪﮔﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻬﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﮓﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻳﺎﺏ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺳــﻪ ﺯﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳــﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺞ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻮﺷﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺯﺍﺋﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﻫﺪ «.ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸــﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻏﻤﺎﺿﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﺣﺎﺟﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﺮﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﺳــﻰ ﺑﻌﺜﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ» :ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ
ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﻫﺸــﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ «.ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻯ
ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻛﺪﺋﻴﻦﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺮﻓﻴﻦﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻴﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺯﺍﺋﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺗﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻠﺖ
ﻋﺪﻡ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟــﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ «.ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻫﺮ
ﺭﻭﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺪ» :ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﺮﻩ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺴــﺠﺪ ﻧﺒﻮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺋﻤﻪ ﺑﻘﻴﻊ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺳﺨﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺴــﺎﻓﺮﺕ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ «.ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ
ﺑﺎﺯﺭﺳﻰ ﺑﻌﺜﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻡ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺜﻤﺮﺛﻤﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺍﺋﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻰ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ «.ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻌﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺯﺍﺋﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ
ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ.ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺍﺋﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺳﻪ ﮔﺮﻡ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺑﻠﻊ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺣﺴﻴﻦﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ» :ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻔﻴﺎﺕ
ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓــﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﮔﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ
34ﺯﺍﺋﺮ 716 ،ﮔﺮﻡ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺸﻬﺪ ﺍﺯ 17ﻧﻔﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺣﺞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ 329 ،ﮔﺮﻡ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ،
ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻬﺮﺁﺑــﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ 16ﻧﻔﺮ 300ﮔﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ
282ﮔﺮﻡ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺍﺯ 12ﺯﺍﺋﺮ ﺣﺞ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
www.mosalas.ir
»xpn
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻧﺶ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ،
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺪﻋﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻛﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺑﻴﺖ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻢﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
87
ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺷﺪ؟
ﻃﺮﺍﺣﺎﻥﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲﺍﻳﻦﺩﻭﻧﻔﺮﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ
ﻭ ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺳﺘﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻭﻱ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺨﻠﻒﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﺩﻻﻟــﻰ ،ﺗﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ »ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻰﺷــﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ« ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؛
ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻧﻲ
ﺟــﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺷــﺪ؛ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻟﻴﮓﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻫﺮﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﮓﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺷﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻓﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ،ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻣﻴﺜﺎﻗﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻟﻴﮓ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻧﻴﻜﺒﺨﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺣﻨﻴﻒ
ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻴﻢ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ
ﻟﻴﮓ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ» :ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ«.
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ،
ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﺤﻤﺪﻯ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺗﻴﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻴﻢﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻫﻢ
ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺁﺷــﻜﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭﺝ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ،
ﻛﻔﺎﺷﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺝ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ،
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﺑﺴﭙﺎﺭﻧﺪ .ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺗﺎﺝ
ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻣﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺗﺨﻠﻒ
ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻻﻟﻴﺴﻢ ،ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻰﺷﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﺍﻳﻢ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴــﻢ «.ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺗﺎﺝ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻢ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﺤﻤﺪﻯ ﻧﻤﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ
88
ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ
ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻯ ،ﻣﺠﺘﺒﻰ ﺷﺮﻳﻔﻰ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻦ
ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺸــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ.
ﻣﺎ ﺍﺻــﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ
ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺘﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ«.
ﺍﻳﻦﺍﻣﺎﻫﻤﻪﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕﻧﺒﻮﺩ،ﭼﻪﺁﻧﻜﻪﺩﺭﭘﺲﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞﻣﻨﺪﺭﺝ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 14/11ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ
ﺍﺯ ﭘﻮﺷــﻴﺪﻥ ﻟﺒﺎﺱﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻠﻒ ،ﺗﻨﮓ ،ﺑﺪﻥﻧﻤــﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺭﻙﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺟﻨﺒﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ
ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻗﻴﺎﻓﻪ )ﻣﻮﻯ ﺳﺮ
ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﺳــﻦ( ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﺪﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺸﻰ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺟﻨﺒﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ
ﺑﺎ ﺷــﺌﻮﻧﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻂ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺍﺟﻨﺒﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺯﻳﻮﺭﺁﻻﺕ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺒﻨﺪ ،ﮔﻮﺷﻮﺍﺭﻩ ،ﺍﻧﮕﺸﺘﺮ ،ﻗﺎﺏ ﺳﺮ)ﺗﻞ ﻭ (...ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ
ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﺴــﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴــﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺑﻴــﺎﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿــﻮﻉ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳﺘﺎﺩ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﮔﻮﻳﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﺎﻛﻴــﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻫــﺮ ﻣﺮﺑﻲﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻤﻜﻴﻦ ﻛﻨــﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﻭ ﻗﻴﺪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﻧــﺪ .ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺟﺪﺍ
ﺑﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺷﺨﺼﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ«.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺻﻤﺪ ﻣﺮﻓﺎﻭﻱ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻫﺮ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻟﺶ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ،
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺳﺘﺨﻮﺵ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺳــﭙﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﻨﮕﻼﺩﺵ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ «.ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻛﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺳــﺮﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺑﻮﻣﺴﻠﻢ،
ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺑﻮﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﻇﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ
ﻛﺎﻇﻤــﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻨﻌﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ
ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃــﻲ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ
ﺑﺒﻨﺪﻳﻢ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﺘﺒﻲ ﺷﺮﻳﻔﻲ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭼﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺁﻥ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﻇﻤﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻥ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﺵ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳــﺮﻣﺮﺑﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ،
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺑﻮﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻭﺟﺎﻫﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎﺟــﺮﺍ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ،ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺗﺎﺝ ﺩﺭﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻮﺟــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﻤــﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻴﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻄــﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ
ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺍﺳــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ«.
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴــﮓ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺧﺎﻟــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃــﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﻱ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﺎﺝ ﻓﻌﻼ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﭘﻴﺸــﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ:
»ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺣﺮﻓﻲ ﺑﺰﻧﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﻩﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ
- 1ﻣﻄﺎﺑــﻖ ﻣــﺎﺩﻩ 60ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ،ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ
ﻭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻴﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺩﻭ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻘﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻣﻮﺍﺩ 62 ،61ﻭ 63ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ،ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻭ
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺼــﺎﺏ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺟﺮﺍﻳﻢ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺍﺷــﺨﺎﺹ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ
ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ،ﻛﻤﻴﺘــﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻨﺪ 2ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 64ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺁﺭﺍﻱ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻱ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺰﻟﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ( ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﻨﺪ 5ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 43ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ،
ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻫﺮ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ 13ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ.
ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻲ
ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ
ﺑﻨﺪ 2ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 60ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃــﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴــﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ .ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣــﻲ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺬﻛــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ،ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﺴﻮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻴﺖ
ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻭﺟﺎﻫﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ
ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒــﺎﻝ ﻧﺎﻗﺺ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﻧﺐ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻘــﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻃﻲ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ
ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺠﻤﻊﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ )ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻨﺪ
2ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 60ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ(.
ﻫﻤــﮕﺎﻥ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺗــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻱ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻓﻲﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻖ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1384ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻋــﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻻﺯﻡﺍﻻﺟﺮﺍ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
24ﻣــﺮﺩﺍﺩ ،1386ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ
ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ،ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ
ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 2ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ،ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ - 1ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ - 2 ،ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ،
- 3ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ - 4 ،ﺩﺑﻴﺮ - 5 ،ﺧﺰﺍﻧﻪﺩﺍﺭ - 6 ،ﺑﺎﺯﺭﺱ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1380ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻴﮓ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 13ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ
ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧــﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻠﺴــﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻟﻴﮓ ﺗﻔﻮﻳﺾ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ
ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻭﻻ؛ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻴﮓ
ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ؛ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺴــﻲ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺗﻲ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺄﺫﻭﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺟﻬﺖ
ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 13ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻻﻏﻴﺮ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ .ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎ
)ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ( ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﺣﺼﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ).ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﻪ 9-2-3 :ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻴﮓ( ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻟﻴﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ
ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﺪﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺑﺤﺚ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳــﺎﻋﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﻠﺴــﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺧﺪﺷﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﻱ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ،ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺷــﺨﺎﺹ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﻳﺎ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ.
- 2ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﻃﻲ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﻫﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺋﺎﺕ ﺷﻐﻠﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴــﻦ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺸــﺎﮔﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﻧﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻋﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻏﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻧﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
89
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ:
ﻣﺎ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ
ﻋﺰﻳـﺰﺍﷲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳـﻴﻮﻥ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ«.ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳـﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺍﺑﻼﻏﻴﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﺩﺭ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺗﻴﻢﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺰﻡ ﺭﺍﺳﺦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ،ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﺴـﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﭼﻪ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ
ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻦ ﻳــﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺣﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻟﻴﮓ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﮕﺮﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺼﻞ
ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺣﺮﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻃﺒـﻖ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳـﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴـﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
90
ﺧﻴﺮ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ 92ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺑــﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻓﻴﻔﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺑـﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣـﺎﻝ ﻧﺤـﻮﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴـﺖ ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑـﺎ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ
ﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﻫﻢ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﮕﻴــﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻦ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻲ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻦ ﻳﺎ
ﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺛﺒﺖﻧﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺑﻄﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ
ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺴـﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﻫﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻛﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻢﻛﻢ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ AFCﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﮕﺮﻱ Aﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺼﻞ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻤﺎﺽ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻳﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﻇﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻧﻴﻤﻜﺖ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺳﺨﺘﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻛﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺿﻤﻦ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﻭ ﺑﻨﺪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻡ 72ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ.ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﺑﻼﻏﻴﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﺮﺽ ﻧﺸﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﺪ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺷﻜﺎﻳﺖﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﺮﺱﻭﺟﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ 86ﺍﺑﻼﻏﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳــﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ،ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻣﺨﺪﺭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺩﺭ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺗﻴﻢﻫﺎﻱ
ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ،ﺩﺳــﺘﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻣﻲ ،ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻳﻢ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ .ﻣﻦ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺴــﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻑ
ﺯﺩﻡ؟ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺴــﺖ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺑﻨﺪﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﻀــﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺩﺭ ﻓﻨﻲ
ﺗﻴﻢﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺩﺭ ﻓﻨﻲ
ﺗﻴﻢﻫﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺒﺤﺚ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﭼﺮﺍﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲﺩﺭﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝﺑﻪﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴــﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ:
ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺑﻄﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺧﻠﻴﻔﻪ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﺕ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴـﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺗﺎﺝ،
ﻧﺎﻳﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳـﻴﻮﻥ ﻃﺮﺡﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺷﺪ.ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭ ﻣﺪﻋﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳـﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻛﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺑﻴﺖ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻢﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳـﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ.ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﭘﺎﻛﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻢﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻓﻮﺗﺒـﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ
ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭﻱ
ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﺯﺍ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷـﻔﺎﻑ ﺷـﺪﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺗﺒﺼﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﺘﺒﻲ ﺷﺮﻳﻔﻲ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺍﺧـﻼﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﭼﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫـﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﺮﺧـﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺨﻠﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨــﺶ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺍژﻩ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ
) moralﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ( ﻭ ) Ethicﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ( ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺵ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺗﻴﻚ،
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ،
ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﺼﻮﺭﺕ
ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺗﺨﻠﻒ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺖ
ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺩﺍﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺍﺯ ﺑــﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﺎﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ
ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴــﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺣﻘﻮﻗﺪﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﺮﻓــﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻳﻢ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﭼــﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺻﻴــﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴــﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺎ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﺮﻓــﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻋﻠــﻢ ﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ،
ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ...ﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻠــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﺪﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣــﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ
ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻴﻢﻫﺎ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﻣﺪﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧــﺪ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑــﺎ ﺑﺪﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﺐ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻦ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻴﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻦ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻳﻢ ﻛــﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒــﺎﻝ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ،ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨــﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒــﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺳﭙﺮﺩ.
ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ FIFA
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺑﺤﺜﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﻟﻮﻛﺎﻟﻴﺰﻳﺸﻦ )ﺑﻮﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ( .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ) (FDCﻧﻴﺰ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺑﻨﺪ ﻟﻮﻛﺎﻟﻴﺰﻳﺸﻦ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﻣﻠﻲ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻨﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺎ ﻛﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﭘـﺲ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻋﺎﻳـﺖ ﺍﺧـﻼﻕ ﺣﺮﻓـﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﻳـﺪ ﺑـﻪ ﺳـﻮﻱ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣــﺎﻝ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺣﺮﻓــﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﺘﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺳﺘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻦ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻃﺒﻖ
ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﻣﺘﺨﻠــﻒ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷﺄﻥ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒــﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﭼﻪ
ﺗﻀﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻣﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺗﻀﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺸــﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ
42ﻣﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧــﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ »ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ« ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻪ ﺗﺒﺼﺮﻩ
ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺄﻥ ،ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﻭ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﻨﺒﻬﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 42ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻳﺎ ﺳﻮءﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ،ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺳﺤﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻠﻲﭘﻮﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺒﻼ ﺣﻖ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺁﻳـﺎ ﻣـﺎﺩﻩ 42ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳـﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﺑـﺎ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﻓــﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻓﻴﻔــﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻨــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.
91
ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ:
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﺩﺑﻴﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﭘﺎﻙﺳﺎﺯﻱﻭﺑﻪﻗﻮﻝﺧﻮﺩﺵﺑﺮﺍﻱﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺑﺎﻟﻤﭙﻨﻴﺴﻢﺩﺭﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﻛﻤﺮﻫﻤﺖﺑﺴﺘﻪﺗﺎﻣﺴﺘﻄﻴﻞﺳﺒﺰﺩﺭﻭﺭﺯﺵﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻋﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﺯﺣﻀﻮﺭﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺳـﻮﺩﺟﻮ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪﻭﭘﺸﺖﭘﺮﺩﻩﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﭘﺎﻙ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭﻱ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺟﻮﺳﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﻫﻴﭻﻣﻨﺎﻓﺎﺗﻲﺑﺎﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻭﻫﻤﻪﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻭﻣﺎﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱﺍﻳﻦﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺯﺩﻝﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ
ﻓﻴﻔﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺎﻟﻢﺳﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ »ﻣﺮﺍﻡﻧﺎﻣﻪ«
ﺗﺸﺒﻴﻪﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﺁﺷﻨﺎﺷﻮﻳﻢ.
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1382ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺭﻓﺘــﻦ ﻧﺎﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﭘﺎﻙ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺍﻡﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺳﺖﺍﻧﺪﺭﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺮﺍﻡﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺩﺭ 21ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
92
ﻣﺮﺍﻡﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﺑـﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ 95ﻣﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻤﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﺳﺖ .ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1383ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ) Green Cardﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﺳﺒﺰ(
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎﺳــﺖ.
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜــﺎﻝ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﺸــﺪﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻤﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺁژﺍﻛﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻫﻠﻨﺪ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ
ﺁژﺍﻛﺲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﺣﻖ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺨﻠﻒ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ
ﺁژﺍﻛﺲ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﭘـﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴـﻦ ﻛﻤﻴﺘـﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃـﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﭼـﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺨﻠﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﭘﺲ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻓﺤﺎﺷﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﺭﺍﺩﻭﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ؟
ﭼــﻮﻥ ﺭﻓﺘــﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﺭﺍﺩﻭﻧﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘــﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺳﺮﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺁﺭژﺍﻧﺘﻴﻦ ﻓﺤﺎﺷﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﺭﺍﺩﻭﻧـﺎ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ ﺑﺪﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑـﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺣﻖ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻲﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻇﺎﻳــﻒ ﻭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏﻫﺎﻱ
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻗﻴﻖﺗﺮ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻫﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺻــﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻃﺒﻖ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌــﺮﻭﻑ ﻭ ﻧﻬﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺳــﭙﺲ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴــﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ
ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻠﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺪﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺗﺎﻣﻞ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ؟
ﻣﺎ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺑــﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ
ﻓﺼﻞ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻓﻴﺮﻭﺯ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻣﻴﺜﺎﻗﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﻭﺿﻊ ﭼﻨﻴــﻦ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺧﻄﺮﺳــﺎﺯ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻙ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺳــﺘﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﭼﻨﻴــﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋــﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨــﺪ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺳــﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻮﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﻓﻀــﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻨــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺨﻠﻔــﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺟﻮﺳــﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ
ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭﺭﺍﺯﻳﺮﺳــﻮﺍﻝﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺜﻼ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻼﻣﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺑﻲ
ﻛﻪ 300ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ 30ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮﺵ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﺗﺴــﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻤﻜﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻳـﺎ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﺴـﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳـﻴﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺷــﺎﻏﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻋﻠﻲ ﻛﻔﺎﺷــﻴﺎﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻪﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻧﻔﺮ
ﺗﺴﺖ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺑﻲﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺗﺴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻴﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺟــﺰﻭ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺭﺍ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺿﻌﻒ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺩﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑـﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺗـﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗـﻲ ﭼـﻪ ﻛﻤﻜـﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ،
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺎﻳﺮﻥﻣﻮﻧﻴﺦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﻟﻴﮓ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻠــﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣــﺎ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻓــﻖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ 18ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩ
ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺸﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺷﻮﻗﻲ
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩﻣﺎﻩﺳﺎﻝ 1387ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱﺍﺯﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻝﺩﺭﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫــﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﭘﺎﻙ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ ،ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ
»ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ« ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺗﺎﺝ ،ﻧﺎﻳﺐﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ،ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻟﻴﮓﻭﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ،ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ
ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻛﻔﺎﺷﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﻏﺒﺖ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻲﻛﺸﻮﺭﺍﺯﺧﻮﺩﻧﺸﺎﻥﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩ.
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸــﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫــﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺑــﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﺳﺮﺩﺭﮔﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺗﻌــﺎﺭﻑ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻲﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ،
ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﺨﻠﻒ ،ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ .ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ 21ﻣﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺳﺘﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﻮﺍﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺷﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺷــﻔﺎﻓﻲ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ
ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳــﺐ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ
ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟
ﺁﻳــﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ
ﺧﻴﺮ؟ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺍﺫﻫﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﻴﻔــﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘــﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻭ ﻛﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ FIFAﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ
ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺪﻝ ﻣﻮ ،ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺯﻳﻮﺭﺁﻻﺕ ﻭ ﭼﺎپ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ
ﺗﻴﺘﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﺍﻱ ،ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎﺩ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻓﻴﻔﺎ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻃﺒﻖ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ،ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ
ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ،ﻫﺮ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﻪﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻱ ﻃﻲ ﻧﺸﺪ.
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭﺿﻊ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴــﻦ ﺭﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻭ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺭﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻳﺎ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻳﺪﻙ
ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ.ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ،
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ...ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺭﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﻟﻴﮓ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ،ﻟﻴﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻡ ،ﻓﻮﺗﺴﺎﻝ ،ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﺍﻥ،
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺳﺎﺣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑــﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 60ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ،
ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﻓﻮﺗﺒــﺎﻝ ،ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻨﺎﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 60ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ
ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺟﺎﻫﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
93
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻲﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥﺗﻴﻢﻣﻠﻲﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ
ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ؛ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ 18:30
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﭘﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﺗﺮﺍژﺩﻯ؛ ﺻﺒﺢ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥ 32ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓﺮ ﻛﻪ 48ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ
18ﻋﺼﺮ ﺳﻪﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻫﺎﻣﺒﻮﺭگ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﺍﻭ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺩﮔﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﺪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﺯﺩ.
ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻰ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳــﺘﺜﻨﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻚ ﻧﺎﮔﻞ،
ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﻩ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺗﻴﺮﺍژ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﻛﻠﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻭ
ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴــﺪ» :ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦﻫﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺯﻭﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺑﻰﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻰ ﺻﺒﻮﺭ،
ﺑﺎﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﻡ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ«.
ﺣﺘﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻧﻜﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﺮگ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺩﻧﺎﻛﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺳﻪﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﺍﺗﻮﻣﺒﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻂﺁﻫﻦ
ﻧﻮﻳﺸﺘﺎﺕ ﺍﻡ ﺭﻭﺑﻦ ﺑﺮگ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻗﻄﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﻣﻦ -ﻫﺎﻣﺒﻮﺭگ
ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻋﺘﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 160ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺩﺭﺩﻧﺎﻙ ﺍﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻰﭘﻮﺵ ﻭ ﻛﺎﭘﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓــﺮ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﺮﺍ
ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﻻﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻬــﺎ ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻭ ﺣــﺎﻻ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣــﺮگ؛ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ
ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﺎﻳﻰ ﻗﻠﺒﻰ ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺖ .ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﻭ ﻋﺸــﻖ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ
94
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻻﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻻﺭﺍ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻓﺴــﺮﺩﮔﻰ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﻓﺖ ﻓﻨﻰ ﻧﺎﺷــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻭﺭﺯﺷــﻰ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭﺝﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖﻫــﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﻯ ﺗﻴــﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔــﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻝ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﮔــﺮﺩﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺗﻠﺨــﻰ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ
ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩ ﺑﺎﻥ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓﺮ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﺯﺩ؛
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺮگ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻋﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸــﻰ ﺑــﺎ ﻗﺎﻃﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻧﻰ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﻞ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﺍﺷــﺘﻔﺎﻥ ﻭﻳﺘﻜﻪ ،ﺳﺨﻨﮕﻮﻯ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺷﻬﺮ
ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻳﻮﺭگ ﻧﺒﻠﻮﻧﮓ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺯﻭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻔﺖﻭ ﮔﻮﻯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟ ﻣﺮگ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺩﻭﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2006
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﻻﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﺗﺮﺯﺍ ،ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷــﺖ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷﺪ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ.
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺗﺮﺯﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺘﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﺭﻭﺣﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻓﺴــﺮﺩﮔﻰ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﭘﺰﺷــﻚ
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺮگ ﻻﺭﺍ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺩﮔﻰ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺩﮔﻰ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻮﺛﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﻭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ .ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮگ ﻻﺭﺍ
ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺘﻰ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﻰ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ
ﺭﻭﺣﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺩﮔﻰ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﭘﻨﻬــﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ.ﻟﻴﻠﻰ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧــﻪ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻯ ﻻﺭﺍ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺮ ﻛﻨــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺯﺍﺩ
ﻫﺸــﺖﻣﺎﻫﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﻭﺣﻰ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﺨﻔﻰ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺩﮔﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﻭﺣﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻋﺬﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮگ ﻻﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺩﮔﻰ
ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮگ ﺩﺧﺘــﺮﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﻭﺣﻰ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴــﺮ ،ﭘﺰﺷﻚ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰ
ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 2003ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ
ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺭﺯﺷــﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺱ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻰﻋﻼﻗﮕﻰ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﻻﺭﺍ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﻣﺮگ ﻻﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺭﻭﺣﻰ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ 18:30ﺭﻭﺯ ﺳﻪﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺑﺪﺷﺎﻧﺴﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺮﺍژﺩﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺪﺷﺎﻧﺴــﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺎﭘﻰ ﻭ
ﺑﻰﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻖ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1985ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻴﻢ ﮔﻤﻨﺎﻡ ﻳﻨﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻳﻨﺎ ،ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﺎﻓﺒــﻚ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻂ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷــﺪ .ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1996ﺑﻪ ﺑﻮﺭﺳﻴﺎ
ﻣﻮﻧﺸﻦ ﮔﻼﺩﺑﺎﺥ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﻨﻔﻴﻜﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺗﻐﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ
ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺪﺷﺎﻧﺴــﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻭ
ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻧﻴﻮﻛﻤﭗ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻫﻦ
ﺑﺎﺭﺳﻠﻮﻧﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺑﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﻨﺮﺑﺎﻏﭽﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺖ .ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ
ﻓﻨﺮﺑﺎﻏﭽﻪ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺗﺮﻙ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺪﻯ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺩﺳــﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻨﺮﻳﻒ
ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓﺮ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺑﻴــﺖ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭﺧﺸــﺶ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻪ
30ﺳﺎﻟﮕﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻡﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ
2010ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﺳــﻨﮕﺮﺑﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﺷﺎﻧﺴﻰ ﺑﻪﺳــﺮﺍﻏﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﻭ ﻋﻔﻮﻧﺖ ﺭﻭﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺩﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺑﺪﺷﺎﻧﺴﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ .ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ
ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﻯ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺷــﻨﺒﻪ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻛﻠﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺷــﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺧﺒﺮ
ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻰ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﺮﻫﻮﻑ ،ﻣﺪﻳــﺮ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠــﻰ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺳــﻴﺎﻩﭘﻮﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﺗﻠﺦﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻭﺭﺯﺷــﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻗﺎﻳﻘﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻯ
ﺑﻴﺮﻫﻮﻑ ﻟﺮﺯﻳﺪ .ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠــﻰ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﻜﺮﻭﻓﻦ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﺴﺖ.
ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﻭﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻌﻀﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻡﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ
ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﻝ ژﺭﻣﻦﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ژﺭﻣﻦﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ.ﻣﻠﻰﭘﻮﺷﺎﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻳﻜﺸﻨﺒﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺗﺪﻓﻴﻦ
ﻫﻤﺒﺎﺯﻯ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻯ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻰﭘﻮﺵ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﺵ ﻻﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺁﻧﮕﻼ ﻣﺮﻛﻞ ﺻﺪﺭﺍﻋﻈﻢ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻼﺗﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ،ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﺪﺭﺩﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻗﻄﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﻩ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓﺮ ﺳﻪﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﺷــﺐ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺗﺠﻤﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻂ ﺭﻳﻞ ﻣﻤﺎﻧﻌﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺠﻤﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺷﻤﻊ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﻭﺍﺯﻩﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻛﺎﭘﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺑﻴﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷــﮕﺎﻩ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻴﺎﻥ :ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭﺣﻴﺪ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ ،2008ﺳﻪ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻫﻢﺗﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓــﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻳﭽﻪ ﻭﻟﻪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ
ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺎﻧﻮﻓﺮ ﻭ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ» :ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﺍﻭ ﻛﺎﭘﻴﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻦ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ
ﺧﻮﺑــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﺍﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺳﻪﺷــﻨﺒﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ
ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ 19:30ﺑﺎﺯﻯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﺪ «.ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ
ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ .ﺍﻭﻝ
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻡ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺷﻮﻛﻪ ﺷﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻡ
ﻧﻤﻰﺷﺪ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﺪﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﺷﺪﻡ.
ﺁﺩﻡ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ«.
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﻭﺣﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺩﮔﻰ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻣﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻡ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﻔﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻡ.
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺗﻌﺠﺐﺁﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻛﺴﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻳﻜﺸﻨﺒﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺘﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻭ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﺒﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻫﺴــﺖ ،ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻜﺎﺭ
ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﺖ«.
95
96
97
98