ماهنامه مثلث شماره 8
ماهنامه مثلث شماره 8
ماهنامه مثلث شماره 8
ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻲ:ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻫﺎﺁﺭﺯﻭ
ﺩﻩ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻓﻴﻠﻤﺸﺎﻥﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷﺪ
ﺩﺭ
ﻏﻢﺯﻣﺎ ﻪ ﺎﻓﺮ ﻕ ﺎﺭ
ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺮﻭ ﺰ ﻣﺸﻜ ﻴ ﻥ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﻚ ﻓﺎﺭﻟﻴﻦ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ 5 /ﻣﻬﺮ 148 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
+48
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﻧﺎﻣﻪ
8ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺎﻗﺮ ﻗﺎ ﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺷﻤﺨﺎ ﻲ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﺭﺟﺒﻲﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﺪیﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻋﻼﻳﻲ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺩﻫﻜﺮﺩی ﻭ ﺭﺿﺎ ﺭ ﻴﺴﻰ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ:
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿ ﻛ ﻮﺯ ﻥ ﺩ ﻭﻭﺩ ﻣﺪﺩﻱ ﻣﻴﺮ ﻣﺤﺒﻴ ﻥ
ﺳﺪ ﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮ ﻭﻻﺩﻱ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﻣﻠﻜﻮ ﻴ ﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻤ ﻲﺧﻮﺷﺨﻮ ﻮ ﻘ ﺳﻢﺭ ﻮﻓﻴ ﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩﺷ ﻮ ﻲ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺣﺴﻦﺳﺒﺤ ﻲ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿ ﺷ ﻥﻣﻬﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﺴﻞﻛﺸﻲ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﭼﺮﺍ »ﭼﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪ
ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺣﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ 8ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺎ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ
ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤﻲ:
ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱﻫﻢﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﺜﻞﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩﻋﻤﻞﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻣﮋﮔﺎﻥ ﺷﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ :ﺩﺭﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﭘﺪﺭ ﺳﺎﺯ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻢ
ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ »ﺗﺘﺮﻭ«
ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻓﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﭘﻮﻻ
ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﺷﻜﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺸﻢ 22 /ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺻﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ
ﻒ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐﻧﻴﺎ :ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ
ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩﭘﻨﺠﻢ 15 /ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﺳﻬﻢ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥﺩﺭﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﺩﻫﻢ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﺭﻭﺳﺎﻱﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ؟
ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﻖ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﺑﺎﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ:
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ،ﻋﻠﻲ ﺧﺮﻡ ،ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻲ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻲ ،ﺳﻴﺪﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺟﺎﺭﻳﺎﻧﻲ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻌﻠﻢ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲ ،ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻃﺎﻫﺮﺧﺎﻧﻲ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﻓﻴﻌﻲ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﻲ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥ
ﻛﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ
MOSALAS.IR
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻘﻴﻤﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ ،ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ ،ﺭﺿﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﻋﻠﻲﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻧﺠﻒ ﻟﮏﺯﺍﻳﻲ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﻼﻣﺘﻲ
ﺍﻛﺮﻣﻲ ،ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻏﺮﻭﻳﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻛﺮﻣﻲ،
ﺣﺠﺖ ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺗﻘﻲ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻋﻠﻲﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺰﺭگ
¸É|¿ » ZÌ-
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ وﺭﺯﺵ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﺩﺍ ﺷﺘﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﯾ ﺮﯾﺘﻰ 2 0ﺳﺎﻝﺭو ﺳﺎى
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿ ﺎ ﯾﺰﺩ ﺍﻧﻰ ﺧﺮﻡ ،ﺟﺰو ﻣﺪﯾ ﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩو
ﻣ ﺤﻤﺪ ﺭﺿﺎﯾﺰ ﺩﺍﻧﻰﺧﺮﻡ ،ﺟﺰوﻣﺪ ﯾﺮ ﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩوﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﯾ ﺮﯾﺘﻰ 20ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭوﺳﺎىﺳﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ و ﺭﺯﺵﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﺩﺍ ﺷﺘﻪ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥﺭﺯﺵ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣ ﺴﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺟﺰو ﻣﺪﯾ ﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖﮐﻪ ﺩﺭﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩ وﺭ ﺍﻥﻣﺪﯾ ﺮﯾﺘﻰ 20ﺳﺎﻝﺭ وﺳﺎى ﺳﺎ و
ﯾﺰ ﺩ ﺍﻧﻰ ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺭﺿﺎ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺮﺩ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻤﻰﺍو
ﺯﺷﻰ
ﺣﻀﺍﻧﻰﻮﺭ
ﯾﺰﺩ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﮐﺮﺩ.ﺍﻣﺎوﺭ
ﻫﺎى
ﻧﻨﺪ.
ﯿﻮﻥﮕﺎﻩ
ﻫﯿﭽ
وى
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪﺩﺍ
ﺍﺳ
ﻮﻥﻣﻰ
ﻓﺪﺭ
ﺭﯾﺦ
ﯾﺎﺩى ﯿ
ﺍﺳ
ﻓﺪﺭ ﺎﺎى
ﺭوﺳﺗ
وﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺍﯾﻦ ﺯ
ﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎى
ﭘﯿﺮ
ﻫﺎى
ﺍﻗﻊﮐﻪ
ﺷﺪ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝﺍﻧﺘو
ﯿﮏ ﮐﻪﺩﺭ
ﻮﺩ
ﺭوﺳﺎىﺑوﺍﺭﺩ
ﺍﻟﻤﭙ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﯽ
ﺗﺮﯾﻦ
ﺘﻰ.ﻰﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﻓﻖﺍو
ﮐﺸﮐﺎﻣ
ﯾﮑﻰﺩﺭﻦﺍﺯﻧﺁﻥﺎ
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﯾ
ﺳﻪﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﻟﯿﻞ ﺍوﺭﺍ
ﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝﮐوﻪ
ﺷﺪ
ﻤﯿﻦ
ﯿﻮﻥوﺭو
ﺭوﺑﻫﻪ
ﺯﯾﺎﺩىﺑﻪ
ﺷﻮﺩ،ﺍﺳ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻓﺪﺭ
ﻣﺎﻥﻫ ﺩﺎىﺭ
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺶ
ﻗﻬﺮ17
ﭼﺎﻟ
ﺍﺳﺖ ؛
وﺯىﺑﺎ
ﮐﺸ ﺘﻰ
ﺭ
ﺖ.
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺮﺩ
ﺍﻧﻰﺍ ﺍوﺳ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
وﺭﺯﺷﻰﻧﻤﻰ
ﯾﺰ ﺩ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﮐﺮﺩ .
ﻫﺎى ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﭽﮕﺎﻩ
ﯿﻮﻥ .
ﻮﺟﻪﺩوى
ﻣﻰ
ﺍﺳﻫﯿ
ﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦﺭ
ﺯﯾﺎﺩىﻓﺪﻣﺘ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍ
ﺳﺎى
ﺯﺷﻰ
ﭘﯿﺮﺍﯾﻦ
ﺩﻫﺎى
ﺭو
ﻫﺎى وﺭ
ﺍﻗﻊﮐﻪ
ﺷﺪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎ
ﯿﻮﻥ
ﺩﺭ و
ﮐﻪ
ﯿﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﺳ
ﻓﺪﺭﺑﻮﺩ
وﺍﻟ
ﭙﯿﮏ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﻧﯽﺍﺭﺩ
ﻟﻤ
ﺩﺭﺯﻣﺎﺍو
ﺗﺮﯾﻦ
ﻧﺎﮐﺎﻣﻰ
ﻣﻮﻓﻖ .ﺍو
ﺁﻥ ﺸﺘﻰ
ﺩﺭﺍﺯ
ﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﮐ
ﺳﺎﻝﯾﮑﻰ
ﻣﻬﻤ ﺍ
ﺍو ﺭ
ﺩﻟﯿﻞ
ﮐﻪﺳﻪ
ﺷﺪﺒﺎﻝو
ﺭوﺍﻟ ﯿ
ﻫﻤﯿﻦ
ﺭوﺑﻪو
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﯾﺎﺩى ﺑﻪ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥﺷﻮﺩ،
ﻫﺎى ﺯ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺳﺖ؛ﺑﺎ 17
ﺸﺘﻰ
ﺭوﺯى
ﮐ ﺍ
ﺖ.
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺮﺩ
ﺍﺳ
ﺍﻧﻰ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺍو
ﺭﺯﺷﻰﻧﻤﻰ
ﯾﺰ ﺩ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﮐﺮﺩ
ﻫﺎى و.ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﻫﯿﭽﮕﺎﻩ
ﯿﻮﻥوى .
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
ﻣﻰ
ﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳ
ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى
ﺳﺎى ﺍ
ﺯﺷﻰ
ﺎى ﻓﺪﺭ
ﺍﯾﻦ
ﺭو
ﭘﯿﺮ وﺭ
ﻫﺎى
ﮐﻪ
ﺍﻗﻊﺩﻫ
ﺷﺪ
ﻧﺘﻘﺎ
ﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﺩﺭو
ﮐﻪ
ﯿﺒﺎﻝﺍ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍ
ﭙﯿﮏ وﺍﻟ
ﺎى
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﯽ ﺳوﺍﺭﺩ
ﺭو
ﺩﺭﺍﻟﻤ
ﺎﻣﻰﺗﺮﯾﻦ
ﻓﻖ .ﺍو
ﮐﺸﺘﻰ
ﻧﺎﮐ
ﺁﻥﻣﻮ
ﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﯾﮑﻰ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍ
ﮐﻪﺳﻪﺍوﻣﻬﻤ
ﺩﻟﯿﻞ
ﺷﺪ و
ﯿﺒﺎﻝ
ﻤﯿﻦ
ﺭوﺑﻪ وﺍﻟﺭو
ﯿﻮﻥ
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى ﻫ
ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺎىﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﺎﻟﺶ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛ﭼ17ﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺸﺘﻰﺑﺎﻗﻬ
ﮐ ﺭوﺯى
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
-Y
ÊËZ
ZÅ Y
» ½Yv³ÁZÅ
] ^y
ÉY ,ZÅ
ÃY¶Ì¸v
»ÊÀv
e ¾Ëe
ÉZÃZe
] ¯ À
Ê»Z£
{YÉ|¼uY
{°
{¿ ËÁºÅ
Ì̤
]Ä
¾Ì
{d·Á
»e | ÀÆ
{ ÊfË
Ê»Ô
É|¿ Y
»|Ë
¨ÅZ
Ä »Zm
|Ë|m
|Y
ÉZ¨
Ĭ¸u
fY
Å
-Y
»ÊËZ
ZÅY³
½Y v ] ÁZÅ^yÉYÃY
¸, ZÅ ¶Ì
»Ê Àv
v e¾Ë
É ZÀ
ÃZ
e¯]e
Ê»Z£{Y
¼| ¿É
{°ËÁ
]uºYÄ
Å Ì̤e
{{¾dÌ·Á
»|ÀÆ
¿| {É
ÊfËË
Ê»ÔY
Å
¨| »Z
Ȁ
¨|ÉZ
|Ë
Zm
mY fY
Ä|¬¸u
Å
ﺍﺯ؛
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻫﺎ
ﺧ ﺒﺮﻫﺑﺎﻭﮔﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻱ
ﺤﻠﻴﻞﺍژﻩ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﺮﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺯ؛
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺤﺮﺍﻥﺵ ﻫﺎ
ﺧﺒﺍﻱﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻭﮔﺰ ﺍﺭ
ﻫﺎ،
ﻠﻴﻞ ﺍژﻩ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱﺮﻳﻦﺗﻣﺤﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺗ
ﺿﺮﻏ ﺎﻣﻲ
ﻤﺪﻱﮋﺍﺩ
ﻜﺮﺩ
ﺭﻭﻳ ﻧ
ﻢﺍﺣ
ﻐﻴﻴ ﺮ
ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻴﻦﺩﻫ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﺗ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪ
ﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺎﺭﻫ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﺻﻔ
ﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘ
ﻫ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺪﻱﺿﺮ
ﺍﺣﻤﻜﺮﺩ
ﺩﻫﻢﺭﻭﻳ
ﺑﻪ
ﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻬﻨ ﺗ
ﺮﻳﺘﻲﺩﺭ
ﻼﻣﻲ
ﺍﺳﺮﻧ ﺪﻱ
ﻣﺪﻳ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭ ﻫ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺪﻳ ﺪ
ﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪﺟ
ﻫ
ﺍﺯ؛
ﻫﺎﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺭﺵ
ﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﻫﺎ ﺑ ﻭﮔﺰ
ﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻱ
ﺤﻠﻴﻞﺍژﻩ
ﺮﻳﻦ ﺴﻨﻲ
ﻣﺤ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ ﺗ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺗ
ﺿﺮ ﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﻤﺪﻱ ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺩﻫﻢﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺍﺣ
ﺑﻪﺭﻭ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧ ﺪﻱ
ﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺟ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺍﺯ؛
ﻫﺎﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺭﺵ
ﺤﺮﺰﺍﻥ
ﺍﻱﺒﺮﻫﺎ ﺑ ﻭﮔ
ﻫﺎ ،ﺧ
ﺤﻠﻴﻞﺍژﻩ
ﺮﻳﻦ ﺴﻨﻲ
ﻣﺤ
ﻨﺎﺭﻱ ﺗ
ﺑﺮﻛﺎﺯﻩﺗ
ﺗ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺪﻱ ﺿﺮ
ﺍﺣﻤﻜﺮﺩ
ﺭﻭﻳ
ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩ
ﻼﻣﻲﺩﺭ ﺗ
ﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳ
ﻣﺪﻳ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺎﻱ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻔ ﺟ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺍﺳﺘ ﻌ
ﺍﺯ؛
ﺰﺍﺭﺵﺸﻫﺎﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮ ﺍﻥ ﻣ
ﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻱﺧ ﺒﺮﻫﺎﻭﮔ
ﺤﻠﻴﻞﺍژﻩ
ﻣﺤ ﺴﻨﻲ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗ
ﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛ ﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﻤﺪﻱﺿﺮ
ﺭﻭ ﻳﻜ ﺮﺩ
ﺩﻫﻢﺍﺣ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻴﻦ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺮﻳﺘﻲﻣﺩﺭﻬﻨﺪ
ﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﺪﻳ ﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍ
ﺸﺪﺍﺭﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘ
ﻫ
ﻣﮋﮔﺎﻥ ﺷﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ :ﺩﺭﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﭘﺪﺭ ﺳﺎﺯ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻢ
ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺻﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ :ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐﻧﻴﺎ :ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ
ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ
168ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻳﻚ
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻼﻟﻲ :ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻻﺑﻲ ﻱ
ﻧﺎﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ44
44
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭم 8 /ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩﭘﻨﺠﻢ 15 /ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﭘﺸﺖ ﭘﺮدﻩ اﻧﺘﺨﺎب وﺯﺭا دﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ و ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﯽ ﻣﻄﻬﺮی
اﮐﺜﺮ وﺯﯾﺮان
اﺻﻠﺢ ﻧﯿﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ZË|À¨/Y
ﮔ ﻔﺖ وﮔﻮﻫ ﺎی و ﯾﮋﻩ ﻣﺜﻠﺚﺑﺎ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﻛﻮﻫﻜﻦ -ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﻲﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺳﻴﺪﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﺍﻛﺮﻣﻲ -ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺁﺭﻳﻦﻣﻨﺶ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ ﺷﻜﻴﺐ -ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﻳﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻘﺪﺳﻲ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﻼﺯﻫﻲ -ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺗﺸﻜﺮﻱ -ﻧﻮﺫﺭ ﺷﻔﻴﻌﻲ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﻧﺮﻳﻤﺎﻥ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺘﻲ -ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ
ﮔ ﻔﺖ وﮔﻮﻫﺎیو ﯾﮋﻩ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﺎ
ﻭ
ﻱﺍ ﺩﻩ
ﺣﺪ ﺯ
ﻱ ﺑﺍ ﻟﻮﺍﻘ ﺳﺎ ﻢ ﺳ ﺮ
ﺪ ،
ﻣﻬ ﺪ ﻱ ﺧﻮﺭ ﺷ ﻴ
ﺨ ﺑﺎﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍ ﺩﮔﺎ ﻩ ﺘﻣ ﻬﻤﺎ ﻥ ﭘﺲﺍ ﺯﻧﺍ ﺘ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻻﺑﻲ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﺯﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪﺗﻘﻠﺐﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻛﻢ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﻧﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﻋﻼءﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ -ﻳﺤﻴﻲ ﺁﻝﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻮﺵ ﻗﻨﺒﺮﻱ -ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻛﻼﻡ -ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺭﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ -ﻋﺴﮕﺮﻱﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩﻱ
ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ -ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻲ -ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺩﻫﻠﻮﻱ -ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ -ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ ﻧﺼﻴﺮﻱ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﻳﻲ
ﭘﯿﺶ ﺑﯿﻨﯽ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ اﺯ ﺭای اﻋﺘﻤﺎد دﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ و ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
4ﯾﺎ 5ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭای
ﻧﻤﯽاوﺭﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ-ﻳﮏ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ -ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ -ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱﺩﻩ
ﺯﺍ
ﺍﺣ ﻤﺪﻭ ﻣ ﻬﺪﻱﺧﻮﺭﺷ ﻴﺪﻱ ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍ ﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺩﺍ ﺩﮔﺎﻩﻣﺘ ﻬ ﻤﺎﻥ ﭘ ﺲ ﺍﺯﺍﻧﺘ ﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍ ﺣﻤﺪ ﻣﻭ ﻬ ﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺭﺷ ﻴ ﺪﻱ ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟ ﻘﺎﺳ ﻢﺳﺮ ﺣﺪﻱ ﺯﺍ ﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ-ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦﺣﻜﻴﻢ-ﻋﺒﺎﺱﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻱ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻱﻓﺮ -ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﻲ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ -ﺑﻴﮋﻥ ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ -ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ -ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻓﺎﺋﻘﻲ
ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻠﻲ
ZfyZÊÀÌu
ºÅ{Ê»Ì̤eYÄ¿ZzeYÁ
{]®Ë]Y
|ÀÀ¯Ê» ÊËZ¼À³] d·Á{ ÉZÅÄ¿Z Êf«Á
§¥Â¸Ì
{ |Ä¿Zzf·Y
ÉZÅÊ]ÓÄ] ¸n»Ê·Ôm
¿ |Å{ʼ¿ÉYº·ZZ
{»Ìa
|Âm d·Y
¿´\¿ Ê·Z ʨ»Ì» ʳ|¿ Ä] ÊÅZ
¨44Äv
§:·ÂmMļZ
]ÉY
¿ É Ê^m º¿Zy
d
dY ¹fv» ½Z{Ây
¨88Äv
8
¸¹ZÆ·Y ¾Ìv»Ô£-[Ânv»ZÌ
^ÊÀ»Â» {Z§ -Ê·Y ʸ Z
ÉZ¿Y |̼m -Á§ ½Z¼Ìa
½ZÌr»Y{Z] ×Y|Y ,½ZËÂeZ¯ |̼u
Ê]¬ Ë |¼v» ,Éi¯¶ÌZ¼Y
{ÉÆ» ʸ , ʨn¿ ÁÓ
»¨Z^ʼZÅÊ
ÂaÊÁ{§ µ{Z
¸{Y¿^¯Y ° -Ê»ZyʬÀÌ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺩﺭ
وﺍﻗﻊ
ﭘﯿﺮ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﺎى
وﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ.ﮐﺸﺘﻰ
ﺑﺎ
ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﻫﺎى
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى
ﺭوﺑﻪ
ﺭو
ﺷﺪ
ﮐﻪ
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ
ﺁﻥ
ﻧﺎﮐﺎﻣﻰ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻟﻤﭙﯿﮏ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﮐﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎى
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
وى
ﮐﺮﺩ.
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺭوﺯى
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﯿﻦ
ﺩﻟﯿﻞ
ﺍو
ﺭﺍ
ﯾﮑﻰ
ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺗﺮﯾﻦ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﺎى
وﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ
ﻣﻰ
ﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺍو
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛
17
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ
و
ﺳﻪ
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺸﺘﻰ.
ﺍو
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﯽ
وﺍﺭﺩ
وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ
ﺷﺪ
ﮐﻪ
ﺍﯾﻦ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﯿﭽﮕﺎﻩ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻧﻤﻰ
ﮐﺮﺩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﺟﺰو
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﮐﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺩوﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺘﻰ
20ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
وﺭﺯﺵ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
4
ﺳﺎل
ﺑﺎ
ﻋﻠﯽ
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{5/¹Á
»{{Y
/1388
100
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{5/¹Á
»{{Y
/1388
100
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
ÃZ»Ìe/µÁY
/1388
84
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{5/¹Á
»{{Y
ﮔﻤﺎﻧ ﻪ ﺯﻧﯽ
ﺑﺎ:
ﺧﺮﻡﺮﻡ:
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲﺍﺩﻩ
ﺩﻱ
ﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﻲﺪ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧ
ﺍﻭﻭﺯ
ﺣﻤ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧ
ﺩﺍ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺴﻦﺍﺩ
ﺴﻦ
ﺪﺭﺿﻢ،ﺎ
ﺤ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻜﻴ
ﺍﻟﺤ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍ ﻟ
ﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺍﺑﻮﺣ
ﻣﺤﻤ
ﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺤﺴﻦ
وﯾﮋﻩ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦﻣﺤﻤ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﻛﻼﻧﺍﺑ
ﺳﭙﻮﺭ ،ﻣ
ﻴﺴﻲ
وﮔﻮﻫﺎی
ﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻋﺒﺎﻋ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻲ
ﻲﺮﺧﻋﻠ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﺩﻛﺘ
ﮔﻔﺖﺮ ﻋﻠ
ﺩﻛﺘ
ﺍﺣ ﻤﺪ
ﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ:
ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﺎﺑﺎﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠ ﺐ
ﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻧﻴﺎ
ﺩﻱ
ﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﻭﻻ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮ ﺍﻣ
ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺮ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﮕ
ﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲﻋﺴ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺁﻝ
ﻳﺤﻴﻲﺭﺋ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟ
ﻳﺤﻴ ﻲ
ﻋ
ZË|À¨/Y|Ë|m
º//q
Ä//ËZ
ZÅ
]ÉZ
]Z
ZË|À¨/Y|Ë|m
º//q
Ä//ËZ
ZÅ
]ÉZ
]Z
ZË|À¨/Y|Ë|m
º//q
Ä//ËZ
ZÅ
]ÉZ
]Z
Ĭ¸u
12
ZË|À¨/Y|Ë|m
º//q
Ĭ¸u
12
|Ë|m
Ĭ¸u
12
ZË|À¨/Y|Ë|m
º//q
MOSALAS.irﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭاﯾﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
دوﻟﺖ
دﻫﻢاﺭاﯾﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
دوﻟﺖ
دﻫﻢ
دﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭد
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ
ﻓﺼﯿﺢ
دﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭد
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ
ﻓﺼﯿﺢﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭیﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭیﺑﺤﺮان
اﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
دﺭ
اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﮑﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﮑﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎد
ﻓﺨﺮاﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
اﺳـﻔﻨﺪﯾﺎﺭ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
ﻧﮑﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﯿﻢ
داﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮد
ﺟﺎﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭا
ﻧﻤﯽ
ﺑﯿﻨﯽ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
دﻗﯿﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
اﯾﺮان
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﯿﻦ
ﺧﺪاﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
ÊZÌ
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
ÊZ̵Z
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
\µZ
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
\ºm
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
h¸j»ºm
»½Y|¬fÀ
]h¸j»YZ
»½Y|¬fÀ
]YZ
É|¼uY
¿{Y
-
ʼZÅ
§Ê¿ZnÀ
»ÉÁ
]
µY|m
4
Ä·Zﺳﺎﯾــﻪ
ﻫﺎﺳﺎﯾــﻪ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺯی
ﺑﺎ½Â»YÌa
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
½Â»YÌaÊ·Y
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
{Ê·Y
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
{
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
MOS ALAS. IR
Á
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﻣﻲ
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻳﻦﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﺭﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﻪﻧﻤﺎ
ﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ
ﻮﻟﻴﺲ
ﺩﺭﺳﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺮﺳﭙ
ﺍﺯﭘﺮ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ ﭘ
ﻤﻲﺩ
ﺍﷲ
ﻲﺩﺍ
ﺍﷲ
ﺳﻴﻒ
ﻛﺮﻳ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤ
ﺳﻴﻒ
ﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﺮﺩﻩﺟ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪﭘﺖ
ﺮﺩﻩ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﭘ ﺸ
ﺖ
ﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﺧ ﺧﻮﺏﺑﺎﻮﺏﺑﺎﻫﭘﺸ ﭘ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
{d·Á
MOSALAS.irﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭاﯾﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
دوﻟﺖ
دﻫﻢاﺭاﯾﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
دوﻟﺖ
دﻫﻢ
دﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭد
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ
ﻓﺼﯿﺢ
دﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭد
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ
ﻓﺼﯿﺢﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭیﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭیﺑﺤﺮان
اﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
دﺭ
اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﮑﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﮑﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎد
ﻓﺨﺮاﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
اﺳـﻔﻨﺪﯾﺎﺭ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
ﻧﮑﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﯿﻢ
داﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮد
ﺟﺎﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭا
ﻧﻤﯽ
ﺑﯿﻨﯽ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
دﻗﯿﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
اﯾﺮان
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﯿﻦ
ﺧﺪاﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
ÊZÌ
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
ÊZ̵Z
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
\µZ
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
\ºm
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
h¸j»ºm
»½Y|¬fÀ
]h¸j»YZ
»½Y|¬fÀ
]YZ
É|¼uY
¿{Y
-
ʼZÅ
§Ê¿ZnÀ
»ÉÁ
]
µY|m
4
Ä·Zﺳﺎﯾــﻪ
ﻫﺎﺳﺎﯾــﻪ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺯی
ﺑﺎ½Â»YÌa
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
½Â»YÌaÊ·Y
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
{Ê·Y
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
{
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
MOSALAS.irﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭاﯾﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
دوﻟﺖ
دﻫﻢاﺭاﯾﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
دوﻟﺖ
دﻫﻢ
دﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭد
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ
ﻓﺼﯿﺢ
دﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭد
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ
ﻓﺼﯿﺢﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭیﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭیﺑﺤﺮان
اﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
دﺭ
اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﮑﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﮑﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎد
ﻓﺨﺮاﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
اﺳـﻔﻨﺪﯾﺎﺭ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
ﻧﮑﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﯿﻢ
داﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮد
ﺟﺎﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭا
ﻧﻤﯽ
ﺑﯿﻨﯽ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
دﻗﯿﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
اﯾﺮان
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﯿﻦ
ﺧﺪاﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
ÊZÌ
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
ÊZ̵Z
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
\µZ
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
\ºm
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
h¸j»ºm
»½Y|¬fÀ
]h¸j»YZ
»½Y|¬fÀ
]YZ
É|¼uY
¿{Y
-
ʼZÅ
§Ê¿ZnÀ
»ÉÁ
]
µY|m
4
Ä·Zﺳﺎﯾــﻪ
ﻫﺎﺳﺎﯾــﻪ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯی
ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺯی
ﺑﺎ½Â»YÌa
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
½Â»YÌaÊ·Y
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
{Ê·Y
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
{
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
MOSALAS.irﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭاﯾﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
دوﻟﺖ
دﻫﻢاﺭاﯾﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
دوﻟﺖ
دﻫﻢ
دﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭد
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ
ﻓﺼﯿﺢ
دﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭد
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ
ﻓﺼﯿﺢﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭیﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭیﺑﺤﺮان
اﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ
دﺭ
اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﮑﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﮑﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎد
ﻓﺨﺮاﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﯾﺪﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
اﺳـﻔﻨﺪﯾﺎﺭ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
ﻧﮑﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﯿﻢ
داﯾﯽ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮد
ﺟﺎﯾﯽ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭا
ﻧﻤﯽ
ﺑﯿﻨﯽ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
دﻗﯿﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
اﯾﺮان
دﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎل
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﯿﻦ
ﺧﺪاﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
ﻋﻜﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻋﻜﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.IRﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ44
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
|Ì¿YÂyﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻧﻴﺎﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻧﻴﺎ]Z
ÊËZÅZf¨³
Z]:Y
ÊËZÅZf¨³
:Yﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮن
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
دﻫﻢ
ﺑﻌﺪ
اﺯ
ﺗﻨﻔﯿﺬ
و
ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻒ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮن
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
دﻫﻢ
ﺑﻌﺪ
اﺯ
ﺗﻨﻔﯿﺬ
و
ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻒ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﺮﻡﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮﻫﺎی
وﯾﮋﻩ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺑﺎ:
ﮔﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮﻫﺎی
وﯾﮋﻩ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺑﺎ:
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
1212
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
18
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
Z:
W
|
§/É
u
¾«
°
Z:
W
|
§/É
u
¾«
°
Z:
W
|
§/É
u
¾«
°
MOSALAS.IR
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﯾﺪ
ﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩﻱ
ﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ
ﺎﻥ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲ
ﺨﻔﻲ
ﺩﮔ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻫﺎﻱﻣ
ﺮﻙﺍﻣﺍﻗﺘﺮ
ﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﺑﻴﻦﺍﺯ
ﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﭘﺲ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﺷﻬ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗ
ﺩﻭ
ﺮﻑ؛
ﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻭﺯ
ﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﺷ
ﻣﺘﻬﺍ4
ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩﺩ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺮﺩ
ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩﺍﻱ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻧﺪﻩﻜ
ﻋﻤﻠﻗﺮ
ﺭﺳﻲﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻗﺮﻭ
ﻧﺪﻩ
ﭘﺮﻭ ﭘﺮ
ﺑﺮ
ﺲ:ﺎ
ﺎﺭﺱﺋ
ﺪ
ﻱ/ﻓﺭ
ﺱ
ﺣ
ﺴ
ﻦﻗﻋ
ﻜ
ﺣﺴ :
ﻓﻗﺎﻋﻜﺋﺪ
ﺧﻮﺏﺑﺎﺑﺎ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﺧﻮﺏ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
MOS ALAS.IR
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻮﺏﻮﺏﺑﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺧ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺧ
MOS ALAS. IR
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﺭی
ﯿﺢ
ﺼﯿﺢ
ﻓﺼ
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞﻨﺎ ﻓﺪ
ﺳﻤ ﺎدﻋ ﺭﯾ ﺑ
ﯿﻞ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﻮﺭد ا
وﮔﻮﻣﻮﺑ ﺎ
ﺑﺎﺭد
ﮔﻔﺖد ﻣﮔوﺭ
دﺭ
ﮔ ﻔﺖ
/1388
ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻲﻃﺒﺎ
ﭘﻮﺭ
ﺷﻤﻲ
ﻫﺎﺷ ﻤﻲ
ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻲ
ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﻫﺎ
ﺼﻄﻔﻲ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ
ﺩﻝ
ﻣ ﻋﺎ
ﺨﮔﺩﻱ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱﺎ
ﻥ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ
ﻔﻲ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲ
ﻫﺎﻱﺮﺘﻣ ﺼﺎﺩ
ﺮﻙﻫﺎﻗ ﻱ
ﻴﻦﻧﺮﺎ ﻪﺍ
ﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﻙ
ﺷﻬﺨﻬ
ﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻭﺯ ﺷﺑﺭﺗ
ﻑ
ﺮﻑ؛ﺩﺯﻭﺍ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻩﻭﺮ ﺩ ؛
ﺷﺭﺷ
ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩﺩﺭ ﺍ4ﺍﺑﺎ
ﻜﺮﺩ ﺎﻩ
ﻱﮔﺮﺩ
ﺍﻱﺍﺭ
ﺪﻩﺍﺮﻜ
ﻭﻧﺪﻩﻗ
ﻤﻠﻋﻤﺮ
ﻲﻋﺮﻧﻭ ﻗﻠ
ﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﭘﺮ
ﺑ ﺑ ﺮﺭ ﺳ ﭘ
ﺳﻪﻟ ﻤﺎ
ﻤﺎ
ﺲ
ﻟﻴﺲ
ﺳ ﻧﻴﻧﻪ
ﺮﺳﭙ ﻮﭙﻮ
ﺳ
ﺩﺭﺮ
ﺍﺯﺯ ﺩﺭ
ﻲﺩﺍﭘ ﭘﺍﺩ
ﻤﻲﺍ
ﺳﻴﻒﻳﺍ ﷲ
ﺍﷲ
ﻴﻒ
ﺳ ﻛﺮﻛﺮﻳﻤ
ﻳﻲ
ﺟﺪﺪﺍﺍﻳﻲ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩﺩﻩ ﺟ
ﺚ
ﭘﺸﺖﭘﺮ
ﻣﺜﻠ
ﺖ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺸﭘ ﻠﻣﺜ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧ ﺎﻣﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ ﻫﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﻮ
ﺏ
ﻫﻔﺘ ﺧﻪ
ﮔ ﻤﺎﻧ ﻪ ﺯﻧﯽﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮنﮐ ﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪدﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺪاﺯ ﺗﻨﻔﯿﺬو ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻒ
ﺑﺤ ﺮان اﻣ ﺮﯾﮑﺎدﺭ اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎن
MOSALAS .ir
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭی
ﻓﺼﯿﺢ
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ
ﻮﺭدﻧﺠﻒ
ﻧﺠﻒ
وﮔ ﻮ
ﺑﺎ
دﺭ ﻣ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻣﻮﺭد
دﺭ وﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮔﻔﺖ
100
:Y ÊË
ÊË ZÅZÅZf¨³
Z f ³
] ]¨ ZZ
ﻻ ﻧﻴﺎ
ﻧﻴﺎﺩ
ﻱ
ﻭﻻﺩﻱﻳ
ﻲ
ﺎﻳﻲ
ﺠ
ﺐ
ﺘﺠﺐﻭ
ﺿ
ﺣﺎﺝﺭﺘﺿﺎ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﺮﺍﻨ
ﮕ
ﺝ
ﻣﻨ
ﺣﺎﻣ
ﻝ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﺍﻣﻴﺮﻣﻴﺮ ﺴ
ﺳ
ﺍﷲ
ﻕﺭﺍ ﻋﻮ
ﻥ
ﺪ
ﺤﺎﻕ،،
ﺳﺎﺍﺳ
ﺤ
ﺍﺳ ﺍﻴ
ﺳﻓ
ﻝ ﻮﺍ
ﻢﺁ
ﺳﻢ
ﺁﻝ
ﻲ ﺋﺭ
ﺳﺎﻴ
ﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟ ﻘﺎ
ﺤﻘ
ﺑﺍ ﻟﻳﻮﺍ
»|Ì ÂY¿ yÊ
|Ì¿YÂy
¼Ê » ÃZ
ÃZ ¼¾ËY
{ ¾ Ë
Y
ﻓﺨﺮاﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺳﮑﻮت
ﺳﮓ ،
ﺌﺎﺗﺮ ،
ﻓﺮ ﻫﺎد
ﺳﮓ
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮانﺗ
وﮔﻮﺮدﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔ
ﻔﺖ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮ ﮔﺑﺎ
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭی
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭی
ﻓﺼﯿﺢ
ﻋﯿﻞﻋﯿﻞ
اﺳﻤﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
اﺳﻤﺎ
ﻮﺭد
ﻧﺠﻒ
وﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ
دﺭ ﻣ
ﻣﻮﺭد
ﻔﺖ
وﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ
ﮔﻔﺖ دﺭ ﮔ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOS ALAS. IR
ﺳﻪ ﻧﻤﺎ
ﻧﻤﺎ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ
ﺲ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴ
ﺩﺍﺩﺩﺍﺩﺩﺭﺩﺭ
ﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻴﻒﺍﷲ
ﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺮ
ﺍﷲ
ﺍﻳﻲﻛﺮ
ﺳﻴﻒ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲﺪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚﺮﺩﻩ ﺟ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﭘ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪﭘ
ﭘﺸﺖ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻮﺏﺑﺎﻮﺏﺑﺎﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺧ
ﻫ ﻔﺘﻪ ﺧ
MOSALAS.ir
ﺳﮓ،ﺮاﺳﺳﻟﺪﮑﮑﯾﻨﯽ
ﻮت
ﮓ
ﻓﺨ
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺳ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎدﺮ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان ﺗﺌ ﺗﺎ
ن
وﮔ داﻮ ﺑﺎ
ﮔﻔﺖﺎﺭ ﺮﮔ
ﺑﺎ ﮐ
وﮔﻮﮔﻮﺑﺎ
ﮔﻔﺖو
ﮔﻔ ﺖ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻭ
ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞا ﺑ
ﻫﺎﻱﻣ ﺍﺻ
ﺰﺍﺭ
ﮑﻞ
ﺑﺮﺭ ﻫ
ﺘﺮﺍضﻧﮋ ﺗﺍﺩﺸ:ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣ ﻤﺪﻱ
ﺍﻋ
ﮐﺎ ﺑﯿﻨﻪ
ﭼﯿﻦ
ﺎﻧﺎن
ﺳﻼم
ﻣﺴﻠﻤ
ﯿﻨﻪ،
ﻗﺒﺎل
ﺎﻓﻆﺣﮐﺎﺑ
ﺮﺧﻲدﺭ
ﯾﺮان
ﺧﺪاﺣ
ﻮﺿﻊ
ﺳﯽ
ﺧﻮﺏﺑﺎﺑﺎ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﺧﻮﺏ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻓﺨﺮاﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﺳﮑﻮت
ﺳﮑﻮت
ﺳﮓ،
ﺳﮓ،
ﺮﻫﺎد
دان ﻓﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮوﮔﻮ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺤ ﺮاناﻣ ﺮ ﯾﮑﺎ دﺭ اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎن
ﺗﺮﻣ ﺮگ
ﺑﯿﻨﯽ
ﺑﻮد
ﻮبﻤﯽ
ﻗﯿﻘﻪﻧ ﺗﺎ
ﺭا
ﻣﺤﺒ
اﺳﻤﺎن
اﯾﯽ د
16
ﻟﻮف؛
ﺗﯿﻢﮐﻪد
ﺗﻮﭘﻮ
ﯾﯽ
ﻮﻧﺎم :
ﻧﮑ ﺟﺎ
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{5/¹Á
»{{Y
/1388
100
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
ÃZ»Ìe/µÁY
/1388
84
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{5/¹Á
»{{Y
ﺘﮕﺎﻩ:
ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻣﭽﻴﺎﻥ
ﭽﻴﺎﻥ
ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺑﻲ
ﻮﺑﻲ
ﺮﻱ
ﻄﻬﺮﻱ
ﺷﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﻣﻄﻬﺑﺎﺑﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯداﺷﻘ
وﮔﻮﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﻳﻌ
ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻣ
وﮔﻮﻫﺎﯾﯽ
ﺑﺎﺯدا
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺍﷲ
ﯾﮏ
ﺮﻱ،ﺍﷲ
ﺍﺳﺪ
ﺠﻔﻲ،
دﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﺳﺪ
ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ،
ﻧﺠﻔﻲ
ﯾﮏ
ﺯﻳﺎﻥ،،
ﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ،
ﺩﻻﻭﺭﺛ
ﻛﻮ
یﻧ
ﺩﻻﻭﺭ
دﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻛﺎﺗﻮ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ا
ﻛﺎﺗ
ﮔﻔﺖ
وﻧﺪﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ای
ﭘﺮوﻧ ﺪﻩ ﭘﺮ
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﯾﺪ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺑﺎﺑﺎﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲﺍﺯ :
ﺘﺠﺐ ﻧﻴﺎ
ﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺣﺎﺝﻣﻨ
ﻋﺴ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﻳﺤﻴﻲﺁﻝ
ﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﻳﺤﻴﻲ ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲ
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﻳﻦ ﺷﻤ
ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭﺩﺭ ﺍ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲ
ﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩ
ﻬﺮﻙ
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺭﺑﻴﻦﺍﺯ
ﭘﺲ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﺷ
ﭘﺲ
ﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺩﻭ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺎﺭﻩ
ﻣﺘ
ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍ
ﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﺭ ﺑ
ﺍﻱﺩ
4
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻱﻗﺮﺩ
ﺭﺳﻲ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﺲ:ﺎ
ﺎﺭﺱﺋ
ﺪ
ﻱ/ﻓﺭ
ﺱ
ﺣ
ﺴ
ﻦﻗﻋ
ﻜ
ﺣﺴ :
ﻓﻗﺎﻋﻜﺋﺪ
MOS ALAS. IR
h ¸j » Ä»Z¿ Äf¨Å Z] [ Ây Äf¨ Å
MOS ALAS. IR
h¸j» Ä »Z¿ Äf¨Å Z ] [ y Äf¨Å
MOSALAS.IR
ﻭﻭﺩﻱﺮﻡﺮﻡﺑﺎ:
ﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ :ﺎ
ﺩﻱ
ﻲ ﺧﺑﺧﻭ
ﺩﺍﺩﺍﻤ
ﺪﻧ
ﺚ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺣﻤ
ﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦﺰﺩﺍ
ﻦ
ﻢ ﻳﻠﺣ
ﺴ
ﻜﻴﻢ،،ﺎ
ﺤ
ﻣﺜﺍﻳ
ﺪﺭﺿ
ﺿﺍ
ﺪﻤﺍﻮ ﻜﺭﻴﻟ
ﺣﺣﺑ
ﯾﮋﻩﺍﺑ
وﯾﮋﻩ
ﻣﺤﻤ
ﻱ
ﻦ
ﺴﻣﺮ ﺤ،
ﺘﺮﻱ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺤ
وﺘ
ﻼ
ﻛﻼﻧﻣﻧ
ی
وﮔﻮﻫﺎی
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،،ﻮﺭﻛ
ﺳﻲ
ﻴﺴﻲ
ﺎ ﺴﭙ
ﻫﻋ ﻴﻋﺒﺎ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻠﻲﻮ
وﮔ ﺮ
ﺩﻛﺘ ﺩﺮﻋ ﻋﺘﻛﻠ
ﻲ
ﺖﺘﺮ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﮔﻔ ﺩﻛ
ﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺣﺪﻱ
ﺣﻤﺪ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺤﺴﻦ
ﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺳﺮﺍ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،ﻳ
ﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦﺍﺑﻮ ﺍ
ﺘﺮﻱ،
ﻣﺤﻤ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﻴﺪﻱ،
ﭙﻮﺭ،ﻛﻼﻧ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻬﺪﻱ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺣﻤﺪ ﻣﻭ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺤ ﺮان اﻣ ﺮﯾﮑﺎدﺭ اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎن
ﺲ:ﺎ
ﺋ
ﺪ
ﻱ/ﻓﺭ
ﺱ
ﺣ
ﺴ
ﻦﻗﻋ
ﻜ
MOSALAS.IR
ISSN: 2008-5281
»¹Z Æ·Y ¾Ìv
»dÌ «YÁ Y ÃZe { -h¸j
ÂaÊ Á{§ µ{Z
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
MOSA LAS.IR
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨ÅZ][Ây Äf¨Å
/1388
¿¼|¿ ÁMÊ
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
ÉÆ
ÃZ´f
½ZÌr
]Ê
^Z
¼Ê
»Â
Y¬ Ë
]»Y{Z
¸Ê
{Z
»|¼v
ZÅ
×Y
¨Ê
],®Ë
¿Ê¨n
|
»
,Éi
YÃZ
¯,½Z
{ÁÓ
¯ËÂeZ
¶]{ÌZ
ÉY|̼u
¼ÃY| ¿Á
a
MO S ALA SR. I
Âa ÊÁ {§ µ{Z
MOS ALAS. IR
100
h
- ¸j»Â³
Z] Á d¨³{{Z ¼fY ÉY YÀÅZ] ÊÀÌ] Ìa
Ê¼Ì ¸ ¾ÌuÉZË|Ì
·Â
{Ê¿Y
´É{ÓÁY
{«Ê
Æ
ʸ Z
¸Ê
|Ë -
¼Z
Ã{Y
vÌu
»ÊÌv
|-Ì×Y
»Ê¿Z¼u
ÔË µÔm
Á
¯Y Z
]ʸ¾¼Æ
YZZÌÆ·Z^y
½zf§Y
Âa
É
ÊËZÅ
ÌY ÃÅ
Z
·¿ Ä
»||¼v
»Ó¼v
--ÊËZ
Ê]Y
ÉY
-ɯZ
e
-×Y
¬|¹
É
|Z
¼f Ë
¿
»»Ê^fn
Ê»Y³
]Zf¨³Z
»|¼v
»|¼v
Z ¼Y
¶Ì
»|Ì ¿YÂyÊ
ÊfÀ
{Y
»±
½
¯ºÅZf
{¿ÁÉ|¼uY
ÃZ
¿ºÆ
Za½ZËY
{]
·^½Z
{d·Á
ÉYYZ
|Ã
³ ^Å
Z]¿Áa
d
»Y¸n
»¶É ZÅ
Zf
Z e¿YÃ|¿Áa
©Y
{
».Ê|ÀÆ
dË
½ÂË
¿^{¿½{Â
{d·Á
Y ËY
»ÊfÌÀ
»Ë Ìv
¸e
»½Y|¬fÀ
¹Â
¿Á¹Z
¿{Â]Ê
Y ZÁY
cZ
ÂeY
½Z»Z
Zf]Ze
] Zzf¿Y
ÉÁÌa
¾ÌeÂ
ZÅ
Ê
aYɵZË
- a¿Z]¼Å
ĻZ
Ê
Ê
]]¯
:Z] h¸j» ÃË Á ÉZųÁd¨³
É{ÁÁ
¹y
Ã{YÉ|u
{Ê¿Y
{Y
|¼uY
¾v·YÂ
Ë
,ºÌ°
Z
º
»|¼v
u]YZ¬,É
¾v
·YÂ
Y] f¿Ô
,É|Ì
» , ¯ÂÊÌ
^bZ
 y É|Æ
¯f
¸Ê
{¯{f
»Á |¼uY
] YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
»ZÌ¿ \nfÀ
´É{ÓÁY
ÊËZ
kZ
µ
u̻Y
Â,½Z
©,
×YZvY
|Y̧ÂWº
µM
ÊÌvË
Z¬·YÂ]Y
{ |Ì ¿YÂyÊ »ÃZ¼¾ËY
cZ ]Zz
É{Z
{½Z³
ʨz
«f
»»
f¿Y
YÉZÅ
Ä¿Z
¾Y
a
zeY
»ÆÌ]½Z¼Æf
Á Á{-¥Y
{] ÃZ
ÃZ³
{ÃZ
4
°
³{Y
«Y
¼¸ Ã
ÉY
{|¿ ÁÊ
] a
Z¼¿ ÄÂba
·Ì
¼{{YY {Ê
×Y¦Ì
˯ ÊËY|m Ã{a da
h¸j
¿» Ä»Z
[ ]f¨ ÄÅZ
Ây Äf¨ Å
MOSALAS.IR
]:Y ÊËZÅZf¨³ Z
ZÌ¿ \nfÀ
´É{ÓÁY
ÊËZ
kZuµÂ,½Z̧ÂW
» Ì»Y
×Y|Y,©ZvYµM
ºÊÌvË
Z¬ ·YÂ]Y
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
É{Zf«YÉZÅ
»{½Z³
»Ê¨z
Æ
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
¾Ì]Á
-¥
]{ ÃZ
Y ÃZ³Y
{ÉY
4
{°Ã|¿Á
«
¸¼ Ê
] a
Z¼¿ Ä{Y
Ì·Âba
{Y{ʼË
×Y¦Ì
¯ ÊËY|m Ã{a
da
h ¸j» Ä»Z¿ Äf¨Z]Å [ Äf¨Å
y
MOSALAS .ir
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
ÉY ¨¿ 5ZË4
¨88Äv
:Z] ÊËZÅ ³Á d ¨³
¯¾Ì¼¿iÂ
É
ÉÁ
Ì ´¿ZÆm
¸Ê¼Ì
Æ]¶ÌZ
º Ë©ZvY
»
¼Y
- -Ê«e
¯Z^Éf¿Ô
Z |̼u
ÊÌ
{ÃZ¼¾ËY
½ Z»Â e 1000 / Äv¨ /1388
¼100 { Y{ » 25 / ¹Á {à Z
»/µÁY µ Z/ʸ̸ ve , É Ä
^y
Z ¿Äf¨Å
ÉZÅ ¹ZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
¦Ì¸ve Á ~̨ Àe Y | ] ºÅ{ Ä ÀÌ]Z¯ ½ »YÌa Ê¿ Ä¿Z¼³
©Y
{
.Ê|ÀÆ
dË
½Â
¿{Â
·d
½YË
¿^{Â
˹Â
ÊfÌÀ
Á˸e
»{Y»ÁÌv
»½Y|¬fÀ
{Â
¿¹Z
Ê¿Zf]Ze
½] »Y
Z
ÂeY
cZ]Z
Z»Z
ÉÁ
ÁY
zf¿Y
Ê
-¾ÌeÂa
ÉZÅ
aY ĻZ
µZ
]Ìa
¼Å
Ë
¯¿ Z
Ê
Ê
] ]
|Ë|m
§ÊÀË°|·Yz
cÂ
,²eZXe
{{ZÅ §½Y
Z] ³Á
d¨³
³Z¯Z]  ³Á
d¨³
{É|À]ZË
tÌ
§ ¶ÌZ¼Y
¿¦n
»{Â
Z]  ³Á
{d¨³
اﺑﺎدی
¼½Z»Âe 10 00 / Äv ¨10 0 /1388 Â Ë Æ µÁY/ÃZ
¹  /µ ÁY µZ/Ê ¸Ì¸ve , É44Äv
^y Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
¨
¨ 38 Äv
½ Z»Âe1 000 /Äv ¨100 /1388{ Y{ »/µÁY18 ÃZ¼/µÁY µ Z/ʸ̸v e ,ÉÄ ^y
»Z¿Äf¨Å
12 Ĭ¸u
»|Ì¿YÂy Ê
]ºÅ{¿ ÃZ
ÊfÀ
{Y
»±
½Zf¯Za
Áº Æ¿ ¼u
½ZËY³
|É
{{d·Á
½Z^·Z
Y ÉY
dY
Y
Ã|¿Á
Z] ^Å
a
¿ÉZÅZf
»¸n
¶»ZY eÃ|¿Á a
:Z]ÊËZųÁ d¨³
½ZÌr
Ê]Â
É
^Z
ÃZ´f
¼Ê
Æ
]¬Y{Z
Ë
]»Y{Z
¸» Ê
»|¼v
ZÅ®Ë
×Y,ʨn
¨Ê
,ÉiÂ
{| YÃZ»¿ÁÓ
½,
{]
¯ZË
¶ÌZ¼Y
ÉYÂÃ|¿Á
¯eZ
| ̼u
a
ºÅ{ d·Á{ µZ^«{ ½ZËY ´·ÂY ÃZeËY M
]½Zf¿Z¤§Y {Z°Ë »M ½Yv
MOSALAS.IR
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
MOS ALAS. IR
ﻣﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﻣﻲ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﻫﻢ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺳﻨﺘﻲ
ﺍﺩ
ﮋﺍﺩ
ﺮگ
ﻣﺮگ
ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﻬﻢﻭﻣ ﻧﺩ
ﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻬﻢ
ﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ
ﻟﺒﺎﻥﻧ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﮔ ﻧ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﮔﺍﺯ
ﺍﻱ
ﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﺯ
ﺍﻱ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﻃﺎ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻠﺲﺑﺎ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﭘﺮ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲﺑﺎ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻫﺎﻱﭘ
ﻣﺠ
ﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻌﺎﻣﻞ
ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞﺍﻧ
ﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺗ
ﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﭘ ﭘ
ﻋﺮﺮﺍﻕ
ﺍﻕ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ؟
ﺯﻳﺴﺖ
ﺯﻳﺴﺖ
ﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﻮﺩ
ﻧﻮﺩ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﺮﺍﻥﻧ
ﻮﻳﻋ
ﻮﻡ
ﻨﻴﺘﻲ
ﺤﻴﻂ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ
ﺳﻮﻡ
ﻣﺤﻴﻂ
ﺳﺗﻠﺍﻳﺍﻳ
ﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩﻭ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺘﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲ
ﻮﺩﻭ
ﺍﺗﻮﺭﻣ
ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ
ﺍﺗﻮﺭﺑﺍﻣ
ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ
ﺗﺎﺑﺴ
ﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻣﻨﺘ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﭘﺮ
ﻮﺗﻴﻦ؛
ﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻫﺎﻱﺍﭘ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ؛
ﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻧﺘﺳ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝﻳﭘﭘﻴﺎﻝ
ﻫﻤﺴﺮ
ﺳﺮ
ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺑ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺴﺮ
ﺑﺑﻫﻤ
اﺑﻬﺎمﻫﺎی
ﮐﻬﺮﯾﺰک
ﮔﻤ ﻧﺎ ﻪﺯ ﻧﯽﭘ ﯿ ﻣﺮا ﻮن ﮐﺑﺎ ﻨﯿ ﻪ ﻫد ﺑﻢ ﻌﺪا ﺯﺗ ﻨﻔ ﯿ ﺬ ﺗ ﺤﯿﻠ ﻒ
ﺑﺎ:
ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮﻫﺎی وﯾﮋﻩ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ :
دوﻟﺖدﻫﻢ
دوﻟﺖ
ﻗﺒﺎل ﻗﺒﺎل
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮا ﯾﺎندﺭ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩاﯾﺎن دﺭ
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮ
ا ﺭاﯾﺶ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ اﺭاﯾﺶ
MOSALAS.ir
ﻨﻔﯿﺬ وﺗﺤﻠﯿﻒ
ﺗﻨﻔﯿ ﺗﺬ و
دﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ اﺯ
ﺑﻌﺪ اﺯ
دﻫﻢﮐﺎ ﺑﯿﻨ ﻪ
ﭘﯿﺮاﻪ ﻣﻮن
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨ
ﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺯﻧﯽ
ﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮن
ﮔ
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﯾﺪ
ﺍﺷﺘﻦﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﻧﺪ
ﻨﺎﺭ ﮔ ﺬ
ﻣﺸﺮ
ﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﮐ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺼﺪﻱﺷﺪ
ﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﺍﺑﻼغ ﻣ
ﻌﻈﻢ
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﺭﺗ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣ :
ﻣﮑﺎﺭمﻣﻘﺎم
ﷲ :ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ
ﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺍﺑﻮﺁﻳﺖ ﺍ
ﺑﻮد
ﯿﻨﯽ
ﺗﺮﺑﻣﺮگ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮبﻤﯽ
ﺭاﻧ ﺗﺎ
اﺳﻤﺎنﻗﯿﻘ ﻪ
16
داﯾﯽد
ﻮف؛
ﺗﯿﻢ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﮐ ﻪ
ﺟﺎﯾﯽ
ﻧﮑﻮﻧﺎم
:
MOSALAS.IR
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﯾﺪ
ﺍﺭﺩ
ﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﮔﺬ ﻧﺪ
ﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻣﺸﺮﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺷﺪﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﺼﺪﻱﺮﻱ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﺭ ﻫﺒ
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺷﻴ ﺗ:
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭمﻣﻘﺎم
ﺍﷲﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺑﻲ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻳﺖ :
ﺍﺑ ﻮﺗﺮﺍ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﺎﻓﻆﺣ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺮﺧﻲ
ﺮﺍ ﺑﻭ
ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻮﻟﮕ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽﺍﺭ
ﻫﺰ
ﺸﮑﻞ ﺍ
ﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺘﺮﺍض :
ﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﺗﻧ
ﺍﺍﻋ
ﻤﺎﻧﺎن ﮐ ﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
ﭼﯿﻦ
ﺳﻼم
ﻣﺴﻠ
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ،
ﻗﺒﺎل
دﺭ
ﺧﺪاﺣن
اﯾﺮا
ﺿﻊ
ﻫﺎﻱﻣ ﻮ
ﺋﺪﻱ /ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ
ﻋﻜﺲ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻗﺎ
ﻋﻜﺲ
::
»ºÌ¿Z
»Ê
Á
{ °¸¼½ ZÉY
»Z
]ÉY
ÿÁ| a
54
Ê
¨Äv
ÌWZ]|ÀÂƳ» Ád¨³
¹Z¿½Z»Z
¨38Äv
{ ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
½ Z»Âe
1000 / Äv ¨ 100 /13 88{Y{ »25 / ¹Á{à Z¼ µÁY
/ µZ/ ʸ̸v e,É ^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
ÉZÅ ¹ZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
:Z]¹y
{É{ÁÁY
|¼uY
{Ê¿Y
»h¸j
¾v·YÂ]Y
,ºÌ°
|Z
»Ë u¼v
ÃËÁ
,Éf¿Ô¯,Âb
»¾v
ÊÌ
ÉZųÁ
¸Z^ Ê
{¯f¯{ f
d¨³
:Z] h¸j» ÃËÁ ÉZųÁd¨³
]Y ÊËZÅZf¨ ³Z
»ZÌ¿ \nfÀ
É{ÓÁ
ÊË
´ZY
½kZ uÂ,
µÌ»Y
|×Y
©,
ZvY
Z̧ÂW
Y µM
¬ ºZ
ÊÌvË·YÂ]Y
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ »Ã Z¼ ¾ËY
É{Zf
{½Z³
ʨz
cZ]Zzf¿Y
»»
ÉZ
« Y
]ÅÄ¿Z¾Ì
ze
Y Æ
Y
Á Á{-¥
aZ¼Æ
{]»½ f
ÃZ
Y 4ÃÃZ³
{ÉYZ³Y
¼¸°
{Y
¿|{Ã
«
]Á a Ê
Z¼ ¿Ä
Ì· Âba
¼{{Y{ Y×YÊ
¦Ì
Ë ¯ Ê ËY|mÃ{h¸j
da a»Ä» ÄZ¿ f¨Å Z ] [ y Äf¨Å
`?AE3>3E W
¼É|À]Z¶ÌZ
§tÌ
¿Ë {¦n
»Y{Â
{ Z ]Â ³
Á d¨³
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ38
ﺻﻔ ﺤﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ 1000 /
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒ ﺮﻱ ،ﺗ ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝﺍﻭ ﻝ /ﺷ ﻤﺎﺭﻩﺩﻭم 25 /ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ100 /138 8
ﺋﺪﻱ /ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ
ﻋﻜﺲ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻗﺎ
ﻋﻜﺲ
::
ʼZÅ
Ã|À ËMfÀ
»»|¼v
»º Ì¿Z » Ê
½Z»Â1000
¨ e / Äv
100 /13 88{ Y{ » 18µÁY
/ ÃZ¼ / µ ÁYµZʸ̸v
/
e ,É ^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
12 Ĭ¸u
¯¦Ì ¸ve Á~̨ Àe Y | ] ºÅ{ Ä À Ì]Z
½Â »YÌa Ê¿ Ä¿Z¼ ³
É{ÁÁ
¹y
¼|Ã {Y
É|u
{Ê¿Y
Y{ uY
¾v
,ºÌ°
Ë º
¼|Z
¬· YÂZ
]u]Y·YÂ
»,Év
»¾v
Y ,É|ÌÂ
¯f¿Ô
,ÂbÊÌ
^Z
¯y f
|É
¸Ê
Æ{» Áf{|¼uY
¯
|Ë|m
|ÊÀË
c
§Â° ·Yz
,²
{ZeZXe
ŧ ½Y{³
Z] ³Ád¨³
Z ¯Z] ³Á
 d ¨³
§½ Zf ¿ Z¤
]Y { Z° Ë »M ½Y v
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻴﻢ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺪﺳﻲ
ﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ
ﺤﻪ54
54
ﺑﺎ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﻣﻬﻨ
ﺻﻔﺑﺎ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻣ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻮﻭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﮔﻮﻭ
ﺖ
ﮔﻔ ﮔ
ﮔﻔ ﺖ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ 12
ﮔﻤﺎﻧ ﻪ ﺯﻧﯽ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ 12
دوﻟﺖدﻫ ﻢ
ﻫﻢ
ﻟﺖ
ل ود د
ﻗﺒﺎل
ندﺭدﺭ ﻗﺒ ﺎ
ﯾﺎن
ﻮﻟﮕﺮاﺮا ﺎﯾ
اﺻ ﻮﻟ ﮕ
ﺶﺗﺗ ﺎﺯﺎﺯﻩﻩﺻا
ااﺭﺭاﯾاﯾﺶ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
اﺳـﻔﻨﺪﯾﺎﺭ
دوﻟﺖ دﻫﻢ
ﻗﺒﺎل ﻟﺖ
ﻗﺒﺎلدﺭ دو
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن دﺭ
اﺭاﯾﺶ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻩ اﺭاﯾﺶﺗ ﺎﺯﻩ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
اﺳـﻔﻨﺪﯾﺎﺭ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ 12
ﻔﯿﺬوﻔﯿﺬو ﺗﺤ ﻠﯿﻒ
دﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺪﺗﻨاﺯ ﺗ ﻨ
ﺑﻌﺪ اﺯ
دﻫﻢﮐ ﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
ﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮن
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
ﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮنﻪ ﺯﻧﯽ
ﮔ ﻤﺎﻧ
دوﻟﺖ د ﻫ ﻢ
دﻫﻢ
ﻗﺒﺎل د وﻟﺖ
دﺭ ﻗﺒﺎ ل
اﯾﺎند ﺭ
اﺻﻮﻟﺮﮕﮕﺮاﯾ ﺎن
ﺎﺯﻩ ﺻ ﻮﻟ
اﺭاﯾﺶﺎﺗ ﺯ اﻩ
ﺭا اﯾ ﺶ
MOSALAS .ir
ﭼــﺸﻢ
اﺳـﻔﻨﺪﯾﺎﺭ
ﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﻧﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﻣﺸﺮﮐﻨﺎﺭﮔﺬ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﺎﻳﻲ
ﻫﺒﺮﻱﺸ
ﺷﺪ
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ ﻣ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺍﺯﻱ ﺭ
ﻌﻈﻢ
ﻬﻮﺭ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﻣﻤﺮ :
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﺷﻴ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم ﺟ
ﺍﷲﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺍﺑﻲ
ﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻳﺖﺮ :
ﺑﺍﻣ ﻮﺗ
ﯾﻨﯽ
ﻮت
ﺳﮑﻮت
ﺨﺮاﻟﺪﺳ ﮑ
ﮓ،
ﺳﺳﮓ
ﺮﻫﺎد
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮﺗﺮ ﻓ
انﺗﻓ ﺌﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
وﮔ دﻮ ﺑﺎ
وﮔﻮﻮ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﮔ ﮐﺎﻔﺖﺭﮔ ﺮ
ﻔﺖ ﮔو
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﮔ
ﻨﺪ م
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻼﻗﻪﻣ
ﺧﺪاﺣﺎﻓﻆﺣﺎ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻋ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍﺭ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﯽﺻ
ﻫﺰ
ﺸﮑﻞ ﺍ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺘﺮﺍض :
ﻤﺪﻱ
ﺍﻋﺍﺣ ﺗ
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭼﯿﻦ
ﺳﻼم
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﯿﻨﻪ،
ﻗﺒﺎل
ﮐﺎﺑ
ﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ اﯾﻭﺮاندﺭ
ﻮﺿﻊ
ﻫﺎﻱﻣ
ﺑﺤ ﺮاناﻣ ﺮﯾﮑﺎ دﺭاﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎن
ﺗﺮ ﺑﺮگ
ﺑﯿﻨﯽ
ﻮد
بﻣ
ﻣﺤﺒﻘﻪﻮﺗﺎ
ﻧﻤﯽ
ﺭا
دﻗ ﯿ
ﻤﺎن
اﯾﯽ
16
ﻮف؛
اﺳ
ﮐﻪ
ﺗﯿﻢ د
ﻮﭘﻮﻟ
ﺎﯾﯽ
ﻮﻧﺎم :
ﻧﮑ ﺟ ﺗ
ﺼﺭی
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭی
ﯿﺢ
ﺼﯿﺢ
ﻞﺑﺎ ﻓﻓﻨ ﺪ
اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞﯾ
ﻧﺠﻒﺎ ﺭﻋدﯿ
ﺠﻒﻤ
ﻣﻮﺭدد ﺳا
وﮔ ﻣﮔﻮ ﺑﺎﻮﺑﺎﺭ ﻧ
ﺖو
ﮔﻔﺖدﺭ
ﮔﻔ دﺭ
دوﻟﺖ دﻫﻢ
دوﻟﺖ
دﺭﻗﺒﺎل
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎنﻗﺒﺎل
اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن دﺭ
ا ﺭاﯾﺶ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ اﺭاﯾﺶ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
MOSALAS.IR
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﯾﺪ
ﺧﻮﺏﺑﺎﺑﺎ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﺧﻮﺏ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻓﺨﺮاﻟﺪ ﯾﻨﯽ
ﺳﮑﻮت
ﺳﮓ ،
ﺳﮓ ،
دانﺮﻫﺎد
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮﻓ
وﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان
ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﮔ ﻔﺖ وﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺤﺮان اﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎدﺭ اﻓﻐﺎﻧ ﺴﺘﺎن
MOSALAS.ir
ﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭی
ی
ﺼﯿﺢ
دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭ
دﺭﻋﯿﻞ ﻓ
ﯿﻞ
ﻧﺠﻒ
اﺳﻤﺎ
ﻮﺭدﻤﺎﻋ
ﻧﺠﻒ
اﺳ
وﮔﻮﻣ ﺑﺎ
دﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭد
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﮔﻔﺖ دﺭوﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
اﺳـﻔﻨﺪﯾﺎﺭ
ﺍﺷﺘﻦﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭﻋﻴﺖﻧ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭﮔﺬ
ﻣﺸﺮ
ﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺼﺪﻱ ﺷﺪ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻮﺭ ﻣ
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺮﺍﺯﻱ :ﺭﺗ
ﻣﻘﺎﺟمﻤﻬ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﮑﺎﺭمﺷﻴ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﷲﻣ ﺑ :ﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﺍﺑﻲ
ﺍﺑ ﻮﺗﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻼﻗﻪ
ﺣﺎ
ﺮﺧﻲ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﻋ
ﻮﺿﻊ ﻭﺑ
ﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﺩﻟﻴ ﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺎﻱ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺸﮑﻞﻫ
ﮋﺍﺩ ﺑ ﻪ
ﺘﺮﺍض ﻧﺗ :
ﺍﺍﻋﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨ ﻪ
ﭼﯿﻦ
ﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﺳﻼم
ﻣﺴﻠ
ﯿﻨﻪ،
ﻗﺒﺎل
ﮐﺎﺑ
ﺧﺪاﺣﺎﻓﻆ
دﺭ
اﯾﺮان
ﺍﺻﻣ
ﺳﯽ
ﺑﺮﺭ
ﻣﺮگ
ﺑﯿﻨﯽ
ﺑﻮد
ﻮب ﺗﺎ
ﻧﻤﯽ
ﺗﺮ
دﻗﯿﻘﻪ
ﻣﺤﺒﺭا
ﻤﺎن
داﯾﯽ
ﻮف؛اﺳ16
ﺟﺎﯾﯽﮐﻪ
ﺗﯿﻢ
ﻮﭘﻮﻟ:
ﻧﮑﻮﻧﺎم
ﺗ
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388{Y{» 18 /µÁY ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^y Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388{Y{» 18 /µÁY ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^y Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388 ÂËÆ µÁY/ ¹Â ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
-h¸j» Z] ³ Á d¨³ { {Z¼fY ÉY Y ÀÅZ] ÊÀÌ] Ìa
ÉY ¨¿ 5ZË4
¿¼|¿ÁMÊ
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ»ÃZ¼¾ËY
:Z]ÊËZųÁ d¨³
ÉÌ´¿ZÆm ©ZvY
^¾Ì¼¿Ê¼Ì¸
Z
Éi¯ ¶ÌZ¼Y - Éf¿Ô¯ ÊÌ
ÉÁÆ] ºË» - Ê«e Z|̼u
]ʼ̸ ¾Ìu - ÁZ¯ ¾¼Æ
É{ÓÁY´ ×Y|Y
Ê«{Z |¼v»Ì»Ô
¸Ê¿Y{Ë Z - Ê¿Z¼u Ê
·|Ì Ê¸- Ã{YÊÌvË µÔm
ÉZËÆ Ê¸ ÀÌu
ÄÌZua Ä»Z¿ ®Ë-d»|y d·Á{ Ze Z¯ d·Á{ Y
½Z» { Z¼Ì - Z°Ë»M Á ½YËY Ä]Y
¿Á |Ë|m ÌW - ÄÀÌ]Z¯ { ½Z
]YÊËZÅÉZf¨³Z
»É|¿»Z̸-ÉY|¼f Ë|¼v
»Z^y Z|¼v» - ɯZ Ê^fn
»½ZÌÆ·Y ÃÅ- ÊËZ Z|¼v
ÂaÌ¿|¼v»- ¹|¬»Ê»Y³¶ÌZ¼Y
¿ÉZzf§YÄ·Ó - Ê]Ye×Y
,661 026$/$6,5
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388{Y{» 25 / ¹Á{ ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
{ÃZ¼¾ËY
»|Ì¿YÂyÊ
ºÅ{ Á ºÆ¿ d·Á{ Z] ¸n» ¶»Z e Ã|¿Áa
ÊfÀ ½ZËY³dYÉZÅZf¿Y
{Y¿É|¼uY Y
±» ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
½Zf¯Za½Z^·Z^Å
]©Y ÊfÌÀ»YZÁY Ê
{ d·Á{ ½Y|¬fÀ» ÉÁÌa
Ê|ÀÆ»¹Z¿ cZ]Zzf¿Y
. ½YËY ¹Â ÂeYaY -¾ÌeÂa ¼Å
]dËÌv» ½Z»ZÄ»Z¿Z¯ Ê
]½ÂË˸eÊ¿Zf]ZeÉZŵZËÊ
]{¿ {Â^¿ Á {Â
¸¹ZÆ·Y ¾Ìv»Ô£ -[Ânv»ZÌ
^ÊÀ»Â» {Z§-Ê·Y ʸ Z
ÉZ¿Y |̼m -Á§½Z¼Ìa
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388{Y{» 25 / ¹Á{ ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^y Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å
ÉZŹZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
¦Ì¸ve Á ~̨Àe Y | ] ºÅ{ ÄÀÌ]Z¯ ½Â»YÌa Ê¿Ä¿Z¼³
12 Ĭ¸u
ÃZ´fY{Z] ®Ë ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
:Z] h¸j» ÃËÁ ÉZųÁd¨³
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
Ã{YÉ|u ºZ¬·YÂ]Y ,É|ÌÂy É|Æ» Á |¼uY
{¯É{ÁÁY{ ¾v·YÂ]Y ,Éf¿Ô¯ ÊÌ f
{¯¹y |¼uY ,ºÌ°u ¾v» ,ÂbZ^ ʸ f
»¹yÊ¿Y{Ë Z|¼v
½ZÌr»Y{Z] ×Y|Y ,½ZËÂeZ¯ |̼u
Ê]¬ Ë |¼v» ,Éi¯¶ÌZ¼Y
{ÉÆ» ʸ , ʨn¿ ÁÓ
»¨Z^ʼZÅÊ
ÂaÊÁ{§ µ{Z
]YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
¸{Y¿^¯Y°-Ê»ZyʬÀÌ
ZÌ¿\nfÀ» µÂ,½Z̧ÂW ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
É{ÓÁY´ ×Y|Y
ÊËZkZu Ì»Y ,©ZvYµM ÊÌvË
»dÌ «YÁ Y ÃZe { -h¸j
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ»ÃZ¼¾ËY
ÉZÅ ¹ZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
12 Ĭ¸u
12 Ĭ¸u
º//q
026$/$6,5
|Ë|m
h¸j» Ä»Z¿ Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
026$/$6,5
|Ë|m
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
{ ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
»|Ì¿YÂyÊ
ºÅ{ Á ºÆ¿ d·Á{ Z] ¸n» ¶»Z e Ã|¿Áa
ÊfÀ ½ZËY³dY ÉZÅZf¿Y
{Y¿É|¼uY Y
±» ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
½Zf¯Za ½Z^·Z ^Å
]©Y ÊfÌÀ»Y ZÁYÊ
{ d·Á{ ½Y|¬fÀ» ÉÁÌa
Ê|ÀÆ»¹Z¿cZ]Zzf¿Y
. ½YËY ¹Â ÂeYaY -¾ÌeÂa ¼Å
]dËÌv» ½Z»ZÄ»Z¿Z¯Ê
]½ÂË˸eÊ¿Zf]ZeÉZŵZËÊ
]{¿ {Â^¿ Á {Â
{cZ]Zzf¿Y Y a ½Z¼Æf» ÃZ³{Y
]É{Zf«Y Ä¿ZzeYÁ 4{°¸¼ Ê
«½Z³{» Æ -¥Y ÃZ³Y
ʨz» ÉZžÌ]Á{ ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Z¼¿ Ä { {Y{ ×Y¦Ì
Ì·Âba Y ʼ˯ ÊËY|m Ã{ada
º//q
026$/$6,5
|Ë|m
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
]Z] ÉZ
ZÅÄ//ËZ
MOSALAS.IR
ÉZŹZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
¦Ì¸veÁ~̨ÀeY| ]ºÅ{ÄÀÌ]Z¯½Â»YÌaÊ¿Ä¿Z¼³
12 Ĭ¸u
ÃZ´fY{Z] ®Ë ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Ĭ¸u
:Z] h¸j» ÃËÁ ÉZųÁd¨³
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
½ZÌr»Y{Z] ×Y|Y ,½ZËÂeZ¯ |̼u
Ê]¬ Ë |¼v» ,Éi¯¶ÌZ¼Y
{ÉÆ» ʸ , ʨn¿ ÁÓ
»¨Z^ʼZÅÊ
ÂaÊÁ{§ µ{Z
{¯É{ÁÁY{ ¾v·YÂ]Y ,Éf¿Ô¯ ÊÌ f
{¯¹y |¼uY ,ºÌ°u ¾v» ,ÂbZ^ ʸ f
»¹yÊ¿Y{Ë Z|¼v
ºÅ{ d·Á{ µZ^« { ½ZËY´·ÂY ÃZe ËYM
|Ë|m
]:Y ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
ZÌ¿\nfÀ» µÂ,½Z̧ÂW ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
É{ÓÁY´ ×Y|Y
-Y ZÅY³ Á ZÅ^y ,ZŶ̸ve ¾ËeÃZe
]ÊËZ» ½Yv
]¯ÉY ÃY ÊÀv» ÉZÀ
ÊËZkZu Ì»Y ,©ZvYµM ÊÌvË
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
12Ĭ¸u
º//q
MOSALAS.IR
|Ë|m
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
ZË|À¨/Y
ÊÀË|·Yz§ {Zŧ Z] ³Ád¨³
c° ,² eZXe ½Y{³Z¯ Z] ³Ád¨³
]½Zf¿Z¤§Y { Z°Ë»M ½Yv
º//q
MOSALAS.IR
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
026$/$6,5
Ê»Z£ {°ËÁ Ì̤e
É|¿ÅZ¨ ÉZ¨ fY
{Y¿É|¼uY Ä] ¾Ì|ÀÆ» Ê»ÔY Ä »Zm Y|Å
ºÅ{ d·Á{ { ÊfËË|» |Ë|m Ĭ¸u
{ |Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
|Ë|m
Ã{YÉ|uºZ¬·YÂ]Y,É|ÌÂyÉ|Æ»Á|¼uY
{¯É{ÁÁY{¾v·YÂ]Y,Éf¿Ô¯ÊÌf
ZË|À¨/Y
]Z] ÉZ
MOSALAS .ir
¦Ì¸ ve Á~̨À e Y | ] ºÅ{ÄÀÌ]Z ¯½Â» YÌa Ê¿Ä¿Z¼ ³
Ã{Y
É|u ºZ ¬·YÂ]Y
,É|ÌÂy É|Æ » Á|¼u Y
{ cZ]Zz f¿YY a ½Z¼Æ f»ÃZ³{Y
¦Ì¸ve Á ~̨Àe Y | ] ºÅ{ ÄÀÌ]Z¯ ½Â»YÌa Ê¿Ä¿Z¼³
Ã{YÉ|u ºZ¬·YÂ]Y ,É|ÌÂy É|Æ» Á |¼uY
{cZ]Zzf¿Y Y a ½Z¼Æf» ÃZ³{Y
·Ä¿Zzf
¸¥Â
{|Y
§Ì
»{Âm
|d·ÌaY
{-É
à ¼¿ÉZ
Z]Mʸ«M
^É|»¿ÂyM
Z
ª§Â
Z]¾ ËY
|º Ë
-É{Z]M
17
ü ¿ÉZ«M
¸Ê
¿|É
»ª§Â
: ÂyM
Z] ¾ËY
^
Z
|ºË
ºÅ{d·Á{µZ^«{½ZËY´·ÂYÃZeËYM
{¯¹y|¼uY,ºÌ°u¾v»,ÂbZ^ʸf
»¹yÊ¿Y{ËZ|¼v
É|À]ZË{ ¦n¿ Z] ³Ád¨³
{ »ţ ¶ÌZ¼Y {Â
ZÅ Ä//ËZ
º//q
Z]h¸j»ÃËÁÉZųÁd¨³
]É{Zf«Y Ä¿ZzeYÁ 4{°¸¼ Ê
«½Z³{» Æ -¥Y ÃZ³Y
ʨz» ÉZžÌ]Á{ ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Z¼¿ Ä { {Y{ ×Y¦Ì
Ì·Âba Y ʼ˯ ÊËY|m Ã{ada
Z§/ É|WZ«¾u °
:
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
É Y Y ¹] Ê
d
f ^vm » º½ ¿ Z·y
ÂmM
{ ¿ÂļZ
]y § \ ¿ Ê Z· ʨ » Ì» ʳ| Ä
¿´¿ Ê Å Z
:ʼÃ|À
ZÅËM fÀ
»»|¼v
{ °¸¼½Z»Z
Á
ÉY
] ÉY Ã|¿Á a
ÌW
Ê
54Äv
»Z]| ÀÆ
¨
½ ³
¿¹Z
ÁdZ»Z
¨³
½ Z»Âe 1000 / Äv¨ 100
¼/138 8{ Y{» 18 /µ ÃZ
ÁY /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve ,É ^yÄ »ZÄf¨Å
¿
12 Ĭ¸u
ºÅ{d·Á{ µZ^« { ½ Z ËY´·Â Y
ÃZ e ËYM
º//q
~{Y|¾fY
¯¿ dÌÁ³ZÀ
»^] »ÊÀ
»ÊËZ
|^Å
É
¡É
|ÔeÂÆ
ȼ
Y] ÉY
¼ ¹Z
m Ì
»¬
¹Z°
¿Ä»Z
ÌW »Ä]×Y
Ê
Ê]YËZd
»
eÂ]ËMY
»¹|À
ZÌ
«^Ä«µZ
»Zu
Ô
Êy
ÊË ½Y
ÁuY|y
·´]Y ËY
»ÄÂ
·¶Ì
]ÂY{ÉÊ
YÅ
ZŶ İ
É
¼| ¿
fuYY
¾Ìq
ÄÀÌ] Z¯½Z
¹Ô
{Z¿d·Á
½¼
»¸
],ÄÀÌ
§ ¯Z
{
»ZZ
]] {YeY
]{Â
ÊÀ
±Ì]e
¿¼»Ê
[Â^v
«ZeÄ ¬Ì
¼Y ½Z
{»{ÊËY
·1 -¥Â
MºÌe
Ä ¯Ê
¿:¹Z
ÂaÂ
ËZ
¿Âm°
e
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻳﻨﺪﻩ :
ﻫﺎﺷ ﻤﻲ
ﻨﺘﻈﺮﺁ
ﻣﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﻱﺍﻱ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﭘ ﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺤﻪ 1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻱ ﺗ ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭ /ﻝ ﺷ ﻤﺎﺭﻩﺍﻭ/ﻝ 18ﻣﺮ ﺩﺍ ﺩ100 /13 88ﺻﻔ /
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒ ﺮ ،
µZ
µZ
ºm
½Y¯Y
¹Zm
{¹Zm¡Y
½Y¯Y
{¡Y
¾Ë
¾Ëe
eÉZÅ
ÉZÅ
ÊZÌ
ÊZÌ
\
\
Ê¿Zn À§ ʼZÅ
Ä·Z 4 µY|m
¼|- {Y¿ É
] É uY
»Á
µZ
ºm½Y¯Y
¹Zm
{½Y¯Y¡Y
{¡Y
¾Ëe
¾Ëe
ÉZÅ
ÉZÅ
ÊZÌ
ÊZÌ
\
\
Ê¿Z nÀ§Ê¼Z
ķZ 4ŵY|m
¿- {Y
¼|] É
»É Á
uY
É
»ÂbZ^ ʸ - ɸÅ{ ¾Ìu Z|¼v
»ÉÌ¿ ×Y| - Ê»ÔY ¾v
¸ÊËYÌ» Ê
ºÅ{ Á ºÆ¿ d·Á{ Z] ¸n» ¶»Z e Ã|¿Áa
ÊfÀ ½ZËY³dYÉZÅZf¿Y
{Y¿É|¼uY Y
±» ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
½Zf¯Za ½Z^·Z^Å
]©YÊfÌÀ»Y ZÁY Ê
{ d·Á{ ½Y|¬fÀ» ÉÁÌa
Ê|ÀÆ»¹Z¿cZ]Zzf¿Y
. ½YËY ¹Â ÂeYaY -¾ÌeÂa ¼Å
]dË Ìv»½Z»ZÄ»Z¿Z¯Ê
]½ÂË˸eÊ¿Zf]ZeÉZŵZËÊ
]{¿ {Â^¿ Á {Â
ÃZ´fY{Z] ®Ë ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
MOSALAS.IR
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﻲ -ﺷﻜﻮﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﻲﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﻲ
ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺻﻔ ﺤﻪ 1000 /
ﺍﻭﻝ 18ﻣﺮﺩﺍ ﺩ100 /13 88
ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﻩ /
/
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺗ
»YZ] ½Y|¬fÀ
»½Y|¬fÀ»h¸j
Ã|¿Áa
»h¸j
d·Á{ Á YZ
]Á YZ
] Ä]Y ½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ã|¿Áa ÉY
.d
.d~³
~³ Äq Ê¿ÂËË
Äq Ê·Y
Ê¿ÂË˸e
¸eÃZ
ÉZÅ
{]ÃZ
»]{ÃZÀ
¼ËZ
ÉZÅ
¿¼ËZ
»¿ ½Â
{ YÌa
»ÃZÀ
{ ½Â»YÌa
ﺑﺎﺯی ﺑﺎ
ﺳﺎﯾــﻪ ﻫﺎ
ﺳﺎﯾــﻪ
YZ] ½Y
»½Y|¬fÀ
»|¬fÀ» h¸j
Ã|¿Áa
»h¸j
{d·Á
d·Á{ÁYZ
]ÁYZ
»] Ä]Y½Â
Ä]Y
YÌaɽ»YÌa
Y Ã|¿Áa ÉY
.d~³
.d
~³ ÄqÄq
¸Ê¿Â ËËÂ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Ê·Y
Ê·Y
{]ÃZ
eÃZ
ÉZÅ
»]{ÃZÀ
ËZ¼¿ÉZÅ
¿¼ËZ
»½Â
{ YÌa
»ÃZÀ
{ ½Â»YÌa
ﺑﺎﺯی ﺑﺎ
ﺳﺎﯾــﻪﻫﺎ
ﺳﺎﯾــﻪ
MOSALAS .ir
ÌW Z] ³ Ád¨³
Ê|ÀÆ» ¹Z¿ ½Z»Z
¨54Äv
YÁµ
Z
ÄÌZua Ä»Z¿ ®Ë-d»|y d·Á{ Ze Z¯ d·Á{ Y
½Z» { Z¼Ì - Z°Ë»M Á ½YËYÄ]Y
¿Á |Ë|m ÌW - ÄÀÌ]Z¯ { ½Z
{ÃZ¼¾ËY
»|Ì¿YÂyÊ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ-ﻳﮏ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ -ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ -ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻱ-ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﻣﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﻣﺠﺘﺒﻲ ﺷﺎﻛﺮﻱ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺧﺒﺎﺯ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ -ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ ﻣﻮﻣﻨﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻌﻠﻲ ﺯﺍﻟﻲ-ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥﻓﺮﻭﺯﺵ -ﺟﻤﺸﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻣﭽﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺑﻲ
ﺩﻻﻭﺭ ﻧﺠﻔﻲ ،ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﻃﺒﺎ
ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻲﭘﻮﺭ
ﺑﺎﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ:
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐﻧﻴﺎ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻔﺤﻪ 1000ﺗ ﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﺩ 100 /138 8ﺻ /
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺷ ﻤﺎﺭﻩﺍﻭﻝ 18 /
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺗ ﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ /
ﮔﻔﺖوﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺠﻒ دﺭﯾﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭی
دﺭ ﻣﻮﺭد اﺳﻤﺎﻋﯿﻞ ﻓﺼﯿﺢ
¿ÉY]Ê^mº¿Zy
dY¹fv»½Z{Ây
¨88Äv
¨38 Äv
{°¸¼ ÉY] ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Á ½Z»Z
^É|¿ÂyM
Z
ª§Â»Z]¾ËY
|ºË
¨38 Äv
¼Z
Ì
a
µ
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
»¹|¬»ÊuZ^» Z»Ô£ - ¾°Å¯ ¾v
À»¾ËM {YÂm - Ê»¯Y ºZ¯|Ì
½Z̨ÂË ×Yc - \Ì° üu
¾Ì»Y wÅZ -ÊÅÔ» |¼v» - Ê|¬» É{ZÅ
»Ê ̨ }¿ - É°eʼZÅ É|Æ
»Â¿ZÆm Z|¼v» - ½Z¼Ë¿ ¾v
ÉZ¿Y ʸ - ÊfËY|Å ¾Ìu
]YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
©ZvYµM ÊÌvË - Ê«{Z |¼v»Ì»LÔ
{³{Ó§ Z|̼u -É^À« ÂËY
ÊËZm
Z^ - ¹Ô¯Z^Ë ©{Z
É{Á»ɴ -ÊÀÌu {Z¼|Ì
§½ZËÂeZ¯ Z|̼u -|¿ÂÀu ½Á|Ë
©{Z É|Æ» - Ê¿Z¼u ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
{ :|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
ÉÌ´¿ZÆm ©ZvY
^¾Ì¼¿Ê¼Ì¸
Z
Éi¯ ¶ÌZ¼Y - Éf¿Ô¯ ÊÌ
ÉÁÆ] ºË» - Ê«e Z|̼u
]ʼ̸ ¾Ìu - ÁZ¯ ¾¼Æ
É{ÓÁY´ ×Y|Y
Ê«{Z |¼v»Ì»Ô
¸Ê¿Y{Ë Z - Ê¿Z¼u Ê
·|Ì Ê¸ -Ã{YÊÌvË µÔm
ÉZËÆ Ê¸ ÀÌu
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388{Y{» 25 / ¹Á{ ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^y Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å
ÉZŹZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ -ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﻋﻼﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻲ -ﺭﺿﺎ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺟﻼﻝ ﻳﺤﻴﻲﺯﺍﺩﻩ -ﻋﻠﻲﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﻲ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭیﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ:
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ -ﺯﻫﺮﻩﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞﮔﺮﺍﻣﻲﻣﻘﺪﻡ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻧﺼﻴﺮﭘﻮﺭ
ﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ -ﻻﻟﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﻱ
ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ:
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻭﻭﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻴﺴﻲﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ ،ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺧﺮﻡ
ﻋﻠﻲﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲﺧﺮﻡ
ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮﻫﺎﯾﯽﺑﺎ:
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻣﭽﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺑﻲ
ﺩﻻﻭﺭ ﻧﺠﻔﻲ ،ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﻃﺒﺎ
ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻲﭘﻮﺭ
ﺑﺎﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ:
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐﻧﻴﺎ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﻳﺤﻴﻲ ﺁﻝﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ ،ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺣﺎﺝﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ 4ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛ ﺷﻬﺮﻙ ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﻔﻲ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﻴﻒﺍﷲ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻤﺎ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﭘﺸﺖﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖوﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﺎد ﻓﺨﺮاﻟﺪﯾﻨﯽ
ﮔﻔﺖوﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮدان ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺳﮓ ،ﺳﮑﻮت
ﺑﺤﺮان اﻣﺮﯾﮑﺎ دﺭ اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎن
§Â·ÂmMļZ
»Ê¼ZÅ|¼v
»Ã|ÀËMfÀ
»ºÌ¿Z»Ê
¸-É{Z]MÊ
ü¿ÉZ«M
»:ʼZÅ |¼v
»Ã|ÀËM fÀ
»ºÌ¿Z»Ê
¸-É{Z]MÊ
17 ü¿ ÉZ«M
{°¸¼ ÉY] ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Á ½Z»Z
^:É|¿ÂyM
Z
ª§Â» Z]¾ËY
|ºË
ÌW Z] ³ Ád¨³
Ê|ÀÆ» ¹Z¿ ½Z»Z
¨54Äv
½Z»Âe
Äv¨
{Y{»
µÁYÃZ¼
µÁYµZ
ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
{{Y
{»
¹Á
Ã
½YËÁ j¯Y
|ÀfÌ¿ t¸Y
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ»ÃZ¼¾ËY
{Y¿ É|¼uY d·Á{ Ze É» d·Á{ Y
{Z¼fY ÉY ÉY] ½YËÁ Ê]Ó
½ ÉYÁ [Zzf¿Y ] µZnÀm
½Zf¿Z¤§YcZ]Zzf¿Y {\¸¬eÄ^WZ
½ZÌ]Yv» Á É{Z]M ʸº¯ ¿Z
¿{ZYcYÁÄÀ˳YÊËZÅÄf¨³ Z
».|ÀÀ¯Ê» Äq Á { ½YY{ÄËZ
-h¸j» Z] ³ Á d¨³ { {Z¼fY ÉY Y ÀÅZ] ÊÀÌ] Ìa
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
]:YÊËZÅÉZf¨³ Z
»É|¿» Z̸-ÉY|¼f Ë |¼v
»Z^y Z|¼v» - ɯZ Ê^fn
»½ZÌÆ·Y ÃÅ- ÊËZ Z|¼v
ÂaÌ¿ |¼v»- ¹|¬»Ê»Y³¶ÌZ¼Y
¿ÉZzf§Y Ä·Ó - Ê]Ye ×Y
ﭘﯿﺶ ﺑﯿﻨﯽ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ اﺯ ﺭای اﻋﺘﻤﺎد دﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ و ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
4ﯾﺎ 5ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭای
ﻧﻤﯽاوﺭﻧﺪ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮﻱ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ -ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ -ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺮگ
ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﻧﻈﺎﻡﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ
ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ؛ ﺍﭘﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ؟
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻧﻮﺩ
ﭘﺮوﻧﺪﻩای دﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﯾﮏ ﺑﺎﺯداﺷﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖوﮔﻮﻫﺎی وﯾﮋﻩ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﺎ:
ﭘﺮوﻧﺪﻩای دﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﯾﮏ ﺑﺎﺯداﺷﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖوﮔﻮﻫﺎی وﯾﮋﻩ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﺎ:
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻭﻭﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻴﺴﻲﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ ،ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻲﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲﺧﺮﻡ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎ ،ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ؛
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ ﺍژﻩﺍﻱ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ
¨44Äv
{ :|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
ÄÌZua Ä»Z¿ ®Ë-d»|y d·Á{ Ze Z¯ d·Á{ Y
½Z» { Z¼Ì - Z°Ë»M Á ½YËY Ä]Y
¿Á |Ë|m ÌW - ÄÀÌ]Z¯ { ½Z
]:YÊËZÅÉZf¨³ Z
»É|¿»Z̸-ÉY|¼f Ë |¼v
»Z^y Z|¼v» - ɯZ Ê^fn
»½ZÌÆ·Y ÃÅ - ÊËZ Z|¼v
ÂaÌ¿ |¼v» - ¹|¬»Ê»Y³ ¶ÌZ¼Y
¿ÉZzf§Y Ä·Ó - Ê]Ye ×Y
¸¹ZÆ·Y¾Ìv»Ô£ -[Ânv»ZÌ
^ÊÀ»Â» {Z§ -Ê·Y ʸ Z
ÉZ¿Y |̼m -Á§ ½Z¼Ìa
¸{Y¿^¯Y° -Ê»ZyʬÀÌ
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388 ÂËÆ 8 /¹ZÆq ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
ÉÆ» ʸ Z] ³ Á d¨³ { YÁ [Zzf¿Y Ã{a da
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388 ÂËÆ µÁY/ ¹Â ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
ÉY ¨¿ 5ZË4
¿¼|¿ÁMÊ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻮم /ﺍﻭﻝ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ:
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻭم 25 /ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
اﺑﻬﺎمﻫﺎی
ﮐﻬﺮﯾﺰک
دﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ اﺯ ﺗﻨﻔﯿﺬ و ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻒ
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪدﻫﻢ
ﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮنﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮن
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﯽ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
MOSALAS.IR
اﺑﻬﺎمﻫﺎی
ﮐﻬﺮﯾﺰک
دﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ اﺯ ﺗﻨﻔﯿﺬ و ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻒ
ﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪدﻫﻢ
ﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮنﮐﺎﺑﯿﻨﻪ
ﺯﻧﯽﭘﯿﺮاﻣﻮن
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﯽ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ 12
اﺭاﯾﺶ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ اﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮاﯾﺎن دﺭ ﻗﺒﺎل دوﻟﺖ دﻫﻢ
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﯾﺪ
MOSALAS.IR
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
§¥Â¸Ì
{|Ä¿Zzf·Y
{»Ìa
|Âmd·Y
¿´\¿Ê·Z ʨ»Ì» ʳ|¿ Ä] ÊÅZ
ÉY ¨¿ 5ZË4
¿¼|¿ÁMÊ
ºÅ{ÁºÆ¿d
·Á{Z]¸n»¶»Z eÃ|¿Áa
ÊfÀ½ZËY³dYÉZÅZf¿Y
{Y¿É|¼uYY
±»ÃZ]{ÉYÃ|¿Áa
½Zf¯Za½Z^·Z^Å
]©YÊfÌÀ»YZÁYÊ
{d·Á{½Y|¬fÀ»ÉÁÌa
Ê|ÀÆ»¹Z¿cZ]Zzf¿Y
.½YËY¹ÂÂeYaY-¾ÌeÂa¼Å
]dËÌv»½Z»ZÄ»Z¿Z¯Ê
]½ÂË˸eÊ¿Zf]ZeÉZŵZËÊ
]{¿{Â^¿Á{Â
Ê
̸ ¸v
e
ÌW Z] ³ Ád¨³
Ê|ÀÆ» ¹Z¿ ½Z»Z
¨54Äv
ﮔﻔﺖﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ54
54
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ 18 /ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱﺭﺍﺳﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥﺳﻨﺘﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺮگ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ
ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ؛ ﺍﭘﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ؟
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻣﺤﻴﻂﺯﻳﺴﺖ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻧﻮﺩ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ 12
ﻳﺤﻴﻲ ﺁﻝﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ ،ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺣﺎﺝﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﻳﺤﻴﻲ
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
»¹|¬»ÊuZ^» Z»Ô£ - ¾°Å¯ ¾v
À»¾ËM {YÂm - Ê»¯Y ºZ¯|Ì
½Z̨ÂË ×Yc - \Ì° üu
¾Ì»Y wÅZ -ÊÅÔ» |¼v» - Ê|¬» É{ZÅ
»Ê ̨ }¿ - É°eʼZÅ É|Æ
»Â¿ZÆm Z|¼v» - ½Z¼Ë¿ ¾v
ÉZ¿Y ʸ - ÊfËY|Å ¾Ìu
]YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
©ZvYµM ÊÌvË - Ê«{Z |¼v»Ì»LÔ
{³{Ó§ Z|̼u -É^À« ÂËY
ÊËZm
Z^ - ¹Ô¯Z^Ë ©{Z
É{Á»ɴ -ÊÀÌu {Z¼|Ì
§½ZËÂeZ¯ Z|̼u -|¿ÂÀu ½Á|Ë
©{Z É|Æ» - Ê¿Z¼u ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
»ÂbZ^ ʸ - ɸÅ{ ¾Ìu Z|¼v
»ÉÌ¿ ×Y| - Ê»ÔY ¾v
¸ÊËYÌ» Ê
-h¸j» Z] ³ Á d¨³ { {Z¼fY ÉY Y ÀÅZ] ÊÀÌ] Ìa
ÉÌ´¿ZÆm ©ZvY
^¾Ì¼¿Ê¼Ì¸
Z
Éi¯ ¶ÌZ¼Y - Éf¿Ô¯ ÊÌ
ÉÁÆ] ºË» - Ê«e Z|̼u
]ʼ̸ ¾Ìu - ÁZ¯ ¾¼Æ
É{ÓÁY´ ×Y|Y
Ê«{Z |¼v»Ì»Ô
¸Ê¿Y{Ë Z - Ê¿Z¼u Ê
·|Ì Ê¸ - Ã{YÊÌvË µÔm
ÉZËÆ Ê¸ ÀÌu
{ÃZ¼¾ËY
»|Ì¿YÂyÊ
^y
Ȁ
¨38 Äv
{°¸¼ ÉY] ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Á ½Z»Z
É{Z]Mʸ Z] µ Z 4
^É|¿ÂyM
Z
ª§Â»Z]¾ËY
|ºË
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ44
44
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺭﺟﺒﻲ ﻱ
ﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ88
8
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ 38
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
4ﺳﺎل ﺑﺎﻋﻠﯽ اﺑﺎدی
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻱ:
ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺷﺪﻳﻢ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ 38
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
4ﺳﺎلﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﯽاﺑﺎدی
ﮔﻔﺖﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ54
54
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻭم 25 /ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ZË|À¨/Y
ZË|À¨/ Y
½YËÁ j¯Y
|ÀfÌ¿ t¸Y
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ»ÃZ¼¾ËY
{Y¿ É|¼uY d·Á{ Ze É» d·Á{ Y
{Z¼fY ÉY ÉY] ½YËÁ Ê]Ó
½ ÉYÁ [Zzf¿Y ] µZnÀm
½Zf¿Z¤§YcZ]Zzf¿Y {\¸¬eÄ^WZ
½ZÌ]Yv» Á É{Z]M ʸ º¯ ¿Z
¿{ZY cYÁÄÀ˳ Y ÊËZÅÄf¨³ Z
».|ÀÀ¯Ê» Äq Á { ½YY{ÄËZ
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
½Z»Âe
Äv¨
{Y{»
¹Á{ÃZ¼
µÁYµZ
ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
½ZÌr»Y{Z]×Y|Y,½ZËÂeZ¯|̼u
Ê]¬ Ë|¼v»,Éi¯¶ÌZ¼Y
{Éƻʸ,ʨn¿ÁÓ
»¨Z^ʼZÅÊ
ÂaÊÁ{§µ{Z
Z
Ä¿ f
¨Å
»Ê¼ZÅ|¼v
»Ã|ÀËMfÀ
»ºÌ¿Z»Ê
¸-É{Z]MÊ
ü¿ÉZ«M
Á
ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺟﻮ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﻋﺎﻟﻲﻧﺴﺐ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲﺑﻪﺑﻪﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ
ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻪﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ:
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ:
ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻴﻢ
ﻋﻠﻲﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ؛
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺮﻩ 17
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ:
ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻴﻢ
ﻋﻠﻲﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ؛
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺮﻩ 17
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻱ:
ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺷﺪﻳﻢ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ 18 /ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ 4ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛ ﺷﻬﺮﻙ ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﻔﻲ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﻴﻒﺍﷲ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻤﺎ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﭘﺸﺖﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﭘﺸﺖ
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388 ÂËÆ 8 /¹ZÆq ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
ÉÆ» ʸ Z] ³ Á d¨³ { YÁ [Zzf¿Y Ã{a da
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388 ÂËÆ µÁY/ ¹Â ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
Z§/É|ZW «¾u : °
MOSALAS.IR
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲﺑﺎ:
ÉZÅÊ]ÓÄ] ¸n»Ê·Ôm
É
¿ |Å{ʼ¿ÉYº·ZZ
¨44Äv
¨88Äv
8
¨Äv
{°¸¼ÉY]ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Á½Z»Z
É{Z]MʸZ]µZ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ ﺧﺮﻡ،ﺟﺰو ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖﮐﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﺩوﺭﺍﻥﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺘﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﺭوﺳﺎىﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥوﺭﺯﺵ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥوﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ وﺳﻪﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﮐﺸﺘﻰ ﺍو ﺯﻣﺎﻧﯽوﺍﺭﺩ وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﮐﻪ ﺍﯾﻦ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ ﻫﯿﭽﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﮐﺮﺩ
ﺭوﺯى ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥﺟﻬﺎﻥﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﯿﻦﺩﻟﯿﻞ ﺍو ﺭﺍ ﯾﮑﻰ ﺍﺯﻣﻮﻓﻖﺗﺮﯾﻦﺭوﺳﺎى ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥﻫﺎى وﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍو ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺸﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎى ﺯﯾﺎﺩى ﺭوﺑﻪﺭو ﺷﺪﮐﻪﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﮐﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﭙﯿﮏ ﺑﻮﺩﮐﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎىﺯﯾﺎﺩى ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪوى ﮐﺮﺩ ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﺭ وﺍﻗﻊ ﭘﯿﺮﺭوﺳﺎى ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥﻫﺎى وﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ÌWZ]³Ád¨³
Ê|ÀÆ»¹Z¿½Z»Z
¨Äv
ÃZ´fY{Z]®ËÃZ]{ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Z]ÊËZųÁd¨³
Ä
¨ v
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻟﺒﻪ ﺗﻴﻎ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ 18ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ
14ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﻳﻊﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲﺩﺭﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪﺩﺭﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺗﻜﺎﻧﻲﺑﺰﺭگﺩﺭﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖﺑﺪﻧﻲ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪﻫﺎﻱﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ZfyZÊÀÌu
ºÅ{Ê»Ì̤eYÄ¿ZzeYÁ
{]®Ë]Y
|ÀÀ¯Ê» ÊËZ¼À³] d·Á{ ÉZÅÄ¿Z Êf«Á
§¥Â¸Ì
{ |Ä¿Zzf·Y
{»Ìa
|Âm d·Y
¿´\¿Ê·Z ʨ»Ì» ʳ|¿ Ä] ÊÅZ
§:·ÂmMļZ
]ÉY
¿ É Ê^m º¿Zy
dY ¹fv» ½Z{Ây
d
»Ê¼ZÅ|¼v
»Ã|ÀËMfÀ
»ºÌ¿Z»Ê
¸-É{Z]MÊ
ü¿ÉZ«M
Á
^É|¿ÂyM
Z
ª§Â»Z]¾ËY
|ºË
ÉZŹZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
»Z½ Â
e
MOSALAS.IR
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮﻱ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ -ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ -ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ -ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﻋﻼﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻲ -ﺭﺿﺎ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺟﻼﻝ ﻳﺤﻴﻲﺯﺍﺩﻩ -ﻋﻠﻲ ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﻲ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ-ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦﺣﻜﻴﻢ-ﻋﺒﺎﺱﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻱ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻱﻓﺮ -ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﻲ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ -ﺑﻴﮋﻥ ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ -ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ -ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻓﺎﺋﻘﻲ
ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻠﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭیﻫﺎﻳﻲﺍﺯ:
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻱ-ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎﻣﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﻣﺠﺘﺒﻲ ﺷﺎﻛﺮﻱ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺧﺒﺎﺯ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ -ﺯﻫﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﮔﺮﺍﻣﻲﻣﻘﺪﻡ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﺼﻴﺮﭘﻮﺭ
ﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ -ﻻﻟﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ -ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻌﻠﻲ ﺯﺍﻟﻲ -ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ ﻣﻮﻣﻨﻲ
ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﺯﺵ -ﺟﻤﺸﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﻲ -ﺷﻜﻮﺭﺍﻛﺒﺮﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﻲﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘ ﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩ ﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻣﺘ ﻬ ﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ88
8
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻮم /ﺍﻭﻝ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲﺍﺯ:
ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ:
ﺍ ﺣﻤ
ﺪ
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺟﻮ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﻋﺎﻟﻲﻧﺴﺐ
ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻪﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ:
ﻱ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺭﺟﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺖ
ﮔﻔﺖ وﮔﻮﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﺑﺎ:
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻟﺒﻪ ﺗﻴﻎ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ 18ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ
14ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﻳﻊﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲﺩﺭﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪﺩﺭﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺗﻜﺎﻧﻲﺑﺰﺭگﺩﺭﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖﺑﺪﻧﻲ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪﻫﺎﻱﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲﺑﺎ:
ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ؛
17
ﻗﺎﻱﻠﻲﻧ ﻤﺮﻩ
ﺁ ﻋ
ﻮﻓﻖ
ﻮﻧﺪﻱ :
ﺁﺧﺑﺎﺭ ﻣ
ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋ ﺒﺎﺱ
ﺷ ﺪ ﻳﻢ
|Ë|m
]YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
ZÌ¿\nfÀ»µÂ,½Z̧ÂWºZ¬·YÂ]Y
É{ÓÁY´×Y|Y
-YZÅY³ÁZÅ^y,ZŶ̸ve¾ËeÃZe
]ÊËZ»½Yv
]¯ÉYÃYÊÀv»ÉZÀ
ÊËZkZuÌ»Y,©ZvYµMÊÌvË
h¸j»Ä»Z¿Äf¨ÅZ][ÂyÄf¨Å
Ê»Z£{°ËÁÌ̤e
É|¿ÅZ¨ÉZ¨ fY
{Y¿É|¼uYÄ]¾Ì|ÀƻʻÔYÄ »ZmY|Å
ºÅ{d·Á{{ÊfËË|»|Ë|mĬ¸u
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ»ÃZ¼¾ËY
Z§
É|ZW «¾u °
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ:
{cZ]Zzf¿YYa½Z¼Æf»ÃZ³{Y
]É{Zf«YÄ¿ZzeYÁ{°¸¼Ê
«½Z³{»Æ-¥YÃZ³Y
ʨz»ÉZžÌ]Á{ÃZ]{ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Z¼¿Ä{{Y{×Y¦Ì
Ì·ÂbaYʼ˯ÊËY|mÃ{ada
ÊÀË|·Yz§{ZŧZ]³Ád¨³
c°,²eZXe½Y{³Z¯Z]³Ád¨³
]½Zf¿Z¤§Y{Z°Ë»M½Yv
É|À]ZË{¦n¿Z]³Ád¨³
{»ţ¶ÌZ¼Y{Â
º//q
026$/$6,5
|Ë|m
h¸j»Ä»Z¿Äf¨ÅZ][ÂyÄf¨Å
ZË|À¨/Y
]Z]ÉZ
ZÅ Ä //ËZ
`?AE3>3E W
ZË|À¨/Y
¾fY~³ZÀ¯]ÊÀ^»É^ź »¹Z¬»Ä»Z¿Ê]YeÂ]Y
»|¡Ô]YÂƼmÌWÄ]ÊËZ
{Y|¿dÌÁ»ÊËZ»É|eÉY̹Z°»×YdËM
¹|À»Ä«ÔÊËZ»Ä]¶Ì·{YÅÄ]{Y¿É|¼uY
d·Á{½ZÌ»ZuÊy]ÁY´·ÂYÉZŶ°eYfY
ÄÀÌ]Z¯¹Ô,ÄÀÌ]Z¯§ZuY|y
]¾Ìq½Z¿Z¼¸»µZ^«{½YËY»Ê
±»ZeĬ̫{-¥Â·ÂaÂe
ÊÀÌ]ʼ¿Y½Z¼MįÊËZm
¿{Â]e[Â^v»ÊËY{ºÌe¹Z¿Â°
·k{ nHk²¼Q
nHk pHn ,ÂThL{¼i pHn ,¬kºp pHn pHn kÅ JIT¨ IM
.k@@ÃÀj ¾@@Äk@@À ·Ho@@«Äj » ·I@@Uj¼@i ¾@M Hn Â@T¶°@w pHn »
Svú JIT¨ ¦Ä I¿¹U ÂzÄkºH SLX¶ Á¼w ¾M yÃQ JIT¨
.k¹¨ ¶ ϼdT¶ Hn ·ITìkºp ¾¨ SwH ¾Tÿ¿º ·A nj ÁpHn
·I«ÄHn ®Ä¼dU ¸ÿ±U ¦Ä IM I¿¹U
n¼z¨ owHow nj (I{ nI¨ ®d¶ IÄ Ïq¹¶ Jnj)
!!!kù¨ Âxº n»IM
021-22901392-93, 0912 120 75 66 .kù¨ ¾Mo\U Hn ·A ·I¶¼U 3500 IM ô£Î
42
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﺮﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺠﻢ
ﺭﺋﻴـﺲ ﺟﻤﻬـﻮﺭ ﻳﻤـﻦ ﺑـﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝﻧﺴﻞﻛﺸﻲﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺩﻛﺘـﺮ ﺍﺳـﺎﻡﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺼﺎﻑ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺷـﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ.
50
ﻓﺮﺵ ﻧﻔﻴﺲ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺳـﻤﻲ ﺣﺎﻛﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﺪﺕ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺘﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ :ﺭﻭﺍﺝ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﺩﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻇﻠﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ20..............................................................................................
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﺎﺭ ﺷﺪ21 .............................................................................................
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺁﺑﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ؟ 22 ..................................................................
ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻲ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ 24..................................................................
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
68
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻏﻢﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻕ ﻳﺎﺭ
ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﻜﺮ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻌﺖ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺸﺎﺑﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷﺪ.
ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ
ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺷﺎﻟﻮﻳﻲ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﻤﻲ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭ
ﻓﺮﺍﺯ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺩﻭ
ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 58ﻭ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻧﺸﺪ72 ........................................
ﻧﺸﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖﺳــﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ 74 .....................................................................
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﺎﺩﻩﺻﺎﻑﻛﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻳﻦﻛﺎﺭﺕ48 .....................................................................
ﻓﺮﺵ ﻧﻔﻴﺲ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ 50 ..........................................................ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﺰﺭگ 51..................................................................................ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭼﭗ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ52 ...................................................................
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ.
ﺳﺮﺍﺏ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ 54............................................................................
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻞ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻡﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻨﺪ56 .........................................................
ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺰﺭگ 58 ...............................................................................
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ 76 ..........................................................
ﭘﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ 60 .................................................................
ﺷﻮﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻛﻬﻦ 77 ...........................................................
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺳﻮﻡ 78........................................................................
ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ 80 ..............................................................................
ﺍﺯ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻲ 82...........................................
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ 84 ..................
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ86 ...........
ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ 88 .................................................................
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳــﺎﻥ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ26 .........................................................
ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻰ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ28.........................................
ﮔﻼﻳﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ29..........................................................................................
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻌﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺦ 30 ............................................................................
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ 31 ...................................................................
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻪ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ 33........................................................
ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺰﻧﮕﺎﻩ 34...................................................................ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ؛ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﻮ 36..........................................................................ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ 54ﺳﺎﻟﮕﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺖ.
ﻏﻢﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻕ ﻳﺎﺭ62 ...............................................................................
ﻫﻢ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭﻡ ،ﻫﻢ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺘﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻋﺼﺒﺎﻧﻲ 64 ..............................................
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻨﻪ
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺷﺨﻮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺷﺒﻬﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺫﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﺪﺍﻋﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻧﺴﻞﻛﺸﻲ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ 90 ..........................................
ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺷــﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﺍﻛﻨــﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻋﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ؟
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ 65 .............................ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻪ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ92 ..............................
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻗﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ94 ....................
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ .ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﻧﺰﺍﻋﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ 38 ............................................................ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ »ﭼﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮگ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻰ 39 ..................................................................ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻓﺮﺍﻓﻜﻨﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ » 40 ..........................................................ﭼﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﮔﻮﺍﺭﺍﺳﺖ 68 ............................................................ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ 96 ................................................
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﺮﺏ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺠﻢ 42 ....................................................................ﻫﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻭﻧﻲ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭼﻲ؟ 71.......................................................................ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ 98 .................................................
4
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ
ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ :ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﺮ
ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺳﺮﺩﺑﻴﺮﻯ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮﻳﻪ:
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮﻳﻪ :ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﻤﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ :ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ :ﺑﻬﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻬﺮﺟﻮ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ:ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﺴﺮﻭﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ :ﺑﺎﺑﻚ ﻏﻔﻮﺭﻱﺁﺫﺭ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ :ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﻧﺠﻲﭘﻮﺭ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ :ﺳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻮﺭﻭﺯﻱ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺷﻮﻗﻲ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻋﻜﺲ :ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮﻳﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ :ﺳﺠﺎﺩ ﺳﺎﻟﻚ -ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺻﺎﻧﻌﻲ -ﺁﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ -ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻩ ﺷﻔﻴﻌﻲ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻰ -ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺍﻓﻀﻠﻲ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ -ﺯﻫﺮﺍ ﻛﻠﻬﺮﻱ -ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﭘﻮﺭ -ﻟﻴﻼ ﻟﻄﻔﻲ
ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﻳﻲ -ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻓﺘﺤﻲ -ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻃﺎﻫﺒﺎﺯ ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﻣﻬﺘﺪﻱ -ﺳﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻲ -ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ -ﻣﻮﻧﺎ ﻗﺎﺳﻤﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻱ -ﻫﻮﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻱ -ﺁﺗﻮﺳﺎ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻴﺎﻥ -ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺭﺑﻮﺷﻪ -ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﻱ -ﻋﻠﻲ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥ
ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺣﺴﻨﻰ
99
ﻭ ﮋﻩ ﻪﻫﺸﺖﺳ ﻝﺩ ﻉ ﺪﺱ
ﺠ ﻪﺩﺭ ﺠ ﻪ ﻦﺷـﻤ ﺭﻩ ﺚ ﺯﺧﻮ ﻲﻫﺸﺖﺳـ ﻝﺩ ﻉ ﻘﺪﺱ ﺳﺖﻛﻪ ﻪ ﺴ ﻞﺳ ﺳﻲ
ﻈ ﻲﻭ ﺮﻫ ﮕﻲ ﻦﺩﻭﺭ ﻥ ﻲ ﺮﺩ ﺯﺩ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎ
ﻓﻨﻲ:
ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ :ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺷﻮﻗﻲ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﻴﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﮔﺮﺍﻓﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺻﻔﺤﻪﺁﺭﺍﻳﻲ :ﻧﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻠﻚﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ -ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻲ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ :ﻫﻮﻣﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻴﺎﻥ
ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ :ژﻳﻼ ﺷﺎﻛﺮﻱ
ﺣﺮﻭﻓﭽﻴﻨﻲ :ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﺣﺸﻤﺘﻲ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ :ﺳﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﻣﻨﻲ -ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻗﻠﻲﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ :ﺑﻴﺘﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺎ
ﺑﺎﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﺯ :ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ -ﻛﻤﻴﻞ ﺧﺠﺴﺘﻪ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﻯ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ -ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﻻﻳﻰ
ﺣﺠﺖ ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ ﺭﺿﺎ -ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻃﻼﻳﻰ -ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﺭﻯ -ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﭼﺎپ :ﺭﻭﺍﻕ
ﭼﺎپ
ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ
ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ :ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﻭ ﮋﻩ ﻣﻪ ﺩ ﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺻ ﺩ ﻪ ﮕﻮ ﺪﺩﺭﺟ ﮓ ﻮﺩ ﻢ
5
ﺩ ﻉ ﺯ ﺟﺮ ﻯ ﮏ ﺭ ﻦ
8
ﺪ ﻪﺳ ﺳ ﻮﻥ ﻋ ﻤ ﺩ ﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻢ
3
ﺮ ﺐ ﺩﻡﻫ ﻱ ﻘ ﻲﺟ ﮓ ﺷ ﺪ
6
ﺟ ﮓﻫ ﭻﻋﻼ ﺖﺳﻮ ﻲ ﺪ ﺭﺩ
ﻜﺮ ﻲﻛ ﺪﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﻮﺣﻪ ﻲﺧﻮ ﺪ ﻢ ﺷﺐﻫﻢ ﻲﺭ ﻢﻋﻤ ﺕ
8
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻲ :ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻔﺖ ﺗﻴﺮ ،ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﺘﺢ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ،ﻧﺒﺶ ﻛﻮﭼﻪ ﻣﺒﻴﻨﻲ ،ﭘﻼﻙ ،121ﻭﺍﺣﺪ 11
ﺗﻠﻔﻦ88140548 :
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﻚ ﻓﺎﺭﻟﻴﻦ
ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻲ:ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻫﺎﺁﺭﺯﻭ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻓﻴﻠﻤﺸﺎﻥﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷﺪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ 5 /ﻣﻬﺮ 148 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭﺩﻭﺳﻮﻱ ﺮﺯ
ﺳ ﺩﻮ ﻤگ
ﭼﺸﻤﻬ ﺶ
ﺯﻱ ﺟ ﻥﺧﺴ ﻪ
ﻛ ﻮﺯ پﺳ ﻤ ﻯﺟ ﮓ
ﺭﻭﺷ ﻔﻜﺮﻫ ﺭﺯﻭﺩ ﺭ ﺪ ﻢﺷ ﻥ ﻞ ﻦ ﻔﺮﻭﺷﺪ
ﭼﻪﻋ ﻰﺩ ﺭﺩ ﻬﺮﺟﻮ ﻰ ﻢﺟ ﮕﻰ ﺴ ﺯﺩ
ژ ﺲ ﺾ ﺮﻭﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺮ ﻫ ﻢ ﻮﺩ
ﻋﻘ ﮕﺮﺩﺩﺭﺳ ﻤ ﻱﺟ ﮓ
ﺮﺧﻮﺏﻫﻤ ﺸﻪﺭ ﻫﺶﺭ ﺪ ﻲﻛ ﺪ
ﻪﺟ ﻱﻛ ﺭﺷ ﺱ ﺳﺮ ﺯ ﻲﮔﻤ ﺭ ﻢ
ﻜﻲ ﻮﺩ ﻜﻲ ﻮﺩ ﺼﻪﺟ ﮕﻲﻛﻪ ﻮﺩ
2
22
24
26
28
3
35
38
4
42
44
46
+48
ﺻ ﺤﻪ ﮋ ﻪ
8ﺳ ﻝ ﺩ ﻉ ﺪﺱ
ﻑ
ی
ی
ﺸ ﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺯ؛
ﺭﺵﻫ
ﻥ ﻣ
ﮔﺰ ﺍ
ﺎ،ﺍ ﻱﺧ ﺒﺮﺑﻫ ﺎﻭﺤ ﺍﺮ
ﻴﻞﺍژﻩ
ﻨﻲ
ﺤ ﻫ
ﻳﻦ ﺗﺴﻠ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺭ ﺗﻱﺮ ﻣ
ﺑﺮﻛ ﻨﺎ
ﺿﮋ ﺍﻏﺎﺮﺩ ﻣﻲ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﻧﺩ
ﻤﺪﻱ
ﻢ ﺍﺣ
ﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﺮﻪ
ﺗﻐﺩﻫﻴ
ﻣﻬﻨﺩﻭﺪﺳﻟﺖ
ﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺪﻫ ﻳﺮﻧﺮﺪﻱ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺻﻔﻣﻳﻌﺎﺭﻪ
ﺟﺪ
ﺟﺎ ﻣ
ﻔﺎ ﺪﻱ
ﺍﺭ
ﻫﺸﻪ
ﺣﻠﻘ
ﺍ ﺳﺘ ﻌ
ﻱ
ﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﻜﺲ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﺴﻞﻛﺸﻲ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﭼﺮﺍ »ﭼﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪ
ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺣﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺱ
ﻲ
ﺴﻦ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪﺑﻪﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ
ﮔ ﻤ ﻧﺎ ﻪ ﻧﺯ ﻲﭘﻴ ﺮﺍﻣ ﻮنﮐﺎ ﺑﻴﻨﻪﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻌ ﺪ ﺍﺯﺗ ﻨﻔﻴ ﺬﻭﻭﺗﺤ ﻠﻴ ﻒ
ﮔ ﻔ ﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫ ﺎ ﻱ ﻭﻳ ﮋ ﻩ ﻣﺜ ﻠ ﺚ ﺑﺎ
ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤﻲ:
ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱﻫﻢﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﺜﻞﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩﻋﻤﻞﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﺷﻜﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﮋﮔﺎﻥ ﺷﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ :ﺩﺭﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﭘﺪﺭ ﺳﺎﺯ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻢ
ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ »ﺗﺘﺮﻭ«
ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻓﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﭘﻮﻻ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﺳﻬﻢ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥﺩﺭﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﺩﻫﻢ
ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﺭﻭﺳﺎﻱﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ؟
ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﻖ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ،ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﺑﺎﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ:
ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ،ﻋﻠﻲ ﺧﺮﻡ ،ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻣﻲ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻲ ،ﺳﻴﺪﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ
ﻣﻌﻠﻢ ،ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺟﺎﺭﻳﺎﻧﻲ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻌﻠﻢ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲ ،ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻃﺎﻫﺮﺧﺎﻧﻲ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﻓﻴﻌﻲ
ﺭﻓﻴﻌﻲ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥ
ﻛﻴﻮﻣﺮﺙ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
:
ﭘﺪﺭ ﺳﺎﺯ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻢ
ﺳﺎﻝﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﺷﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﻣﮋﮔﺎﻥ ﺻﺪ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ
ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ
:
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ
ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ :ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩﭘﻨﺠﻢ 15 /ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﮐﺜﺮ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍن
ﺍﺻﻠﺢ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ:
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﻛﻮﻫﻜﻦ -ﻏﻼﻣﺮﺿﺎ ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺣﻲﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺳﻴﺪﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﺍﻛﺮﻣﻲ -ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺁﺭﻳﻦﻣﻨﺶ
ﺣﻤﺰﻩ ﺷﻜﻴﺐ -ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﻳﻮﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻘﺪﺳﻲ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﻼﺯﻫﻲ -ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺥ ﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺗﺸﻜﺮﻱ -ﻧﻮﺫﺭ ﺷﻔﻴﻌﻲ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﻧﺮﻳﻤﺎﻥ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺴﻮﺯ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺘﻲ -ﻋﻠﻲ ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻟﺒﻪ ﺗﻴﻎ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ 18ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ
14ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﻳﻊﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲﺩﺭﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪﺩﺭﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺗﻜﺎﻧﻲﺑﺰﺭگﺩﺭﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖﺑﺪﻧﻲ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪﻫﺎﻱﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻪﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ:
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺭﺟﺒﻲ ﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺖ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ88
8
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻮم /ﺍﻭﻝ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻻﺑﻲ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﺯﻥ
ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪﺗﻘﻠﺐﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻛﻢ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺮﺍﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﻧﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲﺍﺯ:
ﻋﻼءﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ -ﻳﺤﻴﻲ ﺁﻝﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻮﺵ ﻗﻨﺒﺮﻱ -ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻓﻮﻻﺩﮔﺮ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻛﻼﻡ -ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺭﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ -ﻋﺴﮕﺮﻱﻣﻮﺭﻭﺩﻱ
ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﺴﻨﻮﻧﺪ -ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻲ -ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺩﻫﻠﻮﻱ -ﻋﻠﻲ ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ -ﺳﻌﺪﺍﷲ ﻧﺼﻴﺮﻱ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﻳﻲ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
4ﻳﺎ 5ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍﻱ
ﻧﻤﻲاﻭﺭﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ:
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮﻱ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ -ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ -ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ -ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﻋﻼﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻲ -ﺭﺿﺎ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺟﻼﻝ ﻳﺤﻴﻲﺯﺍﺩﻩ -ﻋﻠﻲ ﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﻲ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ-ﻳﮏ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ -ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ -ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ-ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦﺣﻜﻴﻢ-ﻋﺒﺎﺱﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻱ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻱﻓﺮ -ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﻲ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ -ﺑﻴﮋﻥ ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ -ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ -ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻓﺎﺋﻘﻲ
ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻠﻲ
ZfyZÊÀÌu
ºÅ{Ê»Ì̤eYÄ¿ZzeYÁ
{]®Ë]Y
|ÀÀ¯Ê» ÊËZ¼À³] d·Á{ ÉZÅÄ¿Z Êf«Á
§¥Â¸Ì
{ |Ä¿Zzf·Y
ÉZÅÊ]ÓÄ]¸n»Ê·Ôm
¿ |Å{ʼ¿ ÉYº·ZZ
{»Ìa
|Âm d·Y
¿´\¿ Ê·Z ʨ»Ì» ʳ|¿ Ä] ÊÅZ
¨44Äv
§:·ÂmMļZ
»Ê¼ZÅ|¼v
»Ã|ÀËMfÀ
»ºÌ¿Z»Ê
É
¿ ÉY] Ê^m º¿Zy
dY ¹fv» ½Z{Ây
d
¨88Äv
8
¸-É{Z]MÊ
ü¿ÉZ«M
Á
{°¸¼ ÉY] ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Á ½Z»Z
ﺩﺭ
وﺍﻗﻊ
ﭘﯿﺮ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﺎى
وﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ.ﮐﺸﺘﻰ
ﺑﺎ
ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﻫﺎى
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى
ﺭوﺑﻪ
ﺭو
ﺷﺪ
ﮐﻪ
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ
ﺁﻥ
ﻧﺎﮐﺎﻣﻰ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻟﻤﭙﯿﮏ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﮐﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎى
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
وى
ﮐﺮﺩ.
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺭوﺯى
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﯿﻦ
ﺩﻟﯿﻞ
ﺍو
ﺭﺍ
ﯾﮑﻰ
ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺗﺮﯾﻦ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﺎى
وﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ
ﻣﻰ
ﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺍو
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛
17
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ
و
ﺳﻪ
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺸﺘﻰ.
ﺍو
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﯽ
وﺍﺭﺩ
وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ
ﺷﺪ
ﮐﻪ
ﺍﯾﻦ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﯿﭽﮕﺎﻩ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻧﻤﻰ
ﮐﺮﺩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﺟﺰو
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﮐﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺩوﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺘﻰ
20ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
وﺭﺯﺵ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
4
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺑﺎ
ﻋﻠﻲ
اﺑﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﺭ
وﺍﻗﻊ
ﭘﯿﺮ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﺎى
وﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ.ﮐﺸﺘﻰ
ﺑﺎ
ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﻫﺎى
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى
ﺭوﺑﻪ
ﺭو
ﺷﺪ
ﮐﻪ
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ
ﺁﻥ
ﻧﺎﮐﺎﻣﻰ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻟﻤﭙﯿﮏ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﮐﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎى
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
وى
ﮐﺮﺩ.
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺭوﺯى
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﯿﻦ
ﺩﻟﯿﻞ
ﺍو
ﺭﺍ
ﯾﮑﻰ
ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺗﺮﯾﻦ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﺎى
وﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ
ﻣﻰ
ﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺍو
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛
17
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ
و
ﺳﻪ
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺸﺘﻰ.
ﺍو
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﯽ
وﺍﺭﺩ
وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ
ﺷﺪ
ﮐﻪ
ﺍﯾﻦ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﯿﭽﮕﺎﻩ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻧﻤﻰ
ﮐﺮﺩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﺟﺰو
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﮐﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺩوﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺘﻰ
20ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
وﺭﺯﺵ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
4
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺑﺎ
ﻋﻠﻲ
اﺑﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﺭ
وﺍﻗﻊ
ﭘﯿﺮ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﺎى
وﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ.ﮐﺸﺘﻰ
ﺑﺎ
ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﻫﺎى
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى
ﺭوﺑﻪ
ﺭو
ﺷﺪ
ﮐﻪ
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ
ﺁﻥ
ﻧﺎﮐﺎﻣﻰ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻟﻤﭙﯿﮏ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﮐﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎى
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
وى
ﮐﺮﺩ.
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺭوﺯى
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﯿﻦ
ﺩﻟﯿﻞ
ﺍو
ﺭﺍ
ﯾﮑﻰ
ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺗﺮﯾﻦ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﺎى
وﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ
ﻣﻰ
ﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺍو
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛
17
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ
و
ﺳﻪ
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺸﺘﻰ.
ﺍو
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﯽ
وﺍﺭﺩ
وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ
ﺷﺪ
ﮐﻪ
ﺍﯾﻦ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﯿﭽﮕﺎﻩ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻧﻤﻰ
ﮐﺮﺩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﺟﺰو
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﮐﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺩوﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺘﻰ
20ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
وﺭﺯﺵ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
4
µZ
]Z
¸Ê
É{Z]M
{ :|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
ÄÌZua Ä»Z¿ ®Ë-d»|y d·Á{ Ze Z¯ d·Á{ Y
½Z» { Z¼Ì- Z°Ë»M Á ½YËYÄ]Y
¿Á |Ë|m ÌW - ÄÀÌ]Z¯ { ½Z
É{Á»ɴ -ÊÀÌu {Z¼|Ì
§½ZËÂeZ¯ Z|̼u -|¿ÂÀu ½Á|Ë
©{Z É|Æ» - Ê¿Z¼u ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
»ÂbZ^ ʸ - ɸÅ{ ¾Ìu Z|¼v
»ÉÌ¿ ×Y| - Ê»ÔY ¾v
¸ÊËYÌ» Ê
]:YÊËZÅÉZf¨³ Z
»½ZÌÆ·Y ÃÅ- ÊËZ Z|¼v
ÂaÌ¿ |¼v»- ¹|¬»Ê»Y³¶ÌZ¼Y
¿ÉZzf§Y Ä·Ó - Ê]Ye ×Y
ºÅ{ Á ºÆ¿ d·Á{ Z] ¸n» ¶»Z e Ã|¿Áa
ÊfÀ ½ZËY³dYÉZÅZf¿Y
{Y¿É|¼uY Y
±» ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
½Zf¯Za ½Z^·Z^Å
]©YÊfÌÀ»YZÁY Ê
{ d·Á{ ½Y|¬fÀ»ÉÁÌa
Ê|ÀÆ»¹Z¿cZ]Zzf¿Y
. ½YËY¹Â ÂeYaY -¾ÌeÂa ¼Å
]dË Ìv» ½Z»ZÄ»Z¿Z¯Ê
]½ÂË˸eÊ¿Zf]ZeÉZŵZËÊ
½ZÌr»Y{Z] ×Y|Y ,½ZËÂeZ¯ |̼u
Ê]¬ Ë |¼v» ,Éi¯¶ÌZ¼Y
{ÉÆ» ʸ , ʨn¿ ÁÓ
»¨Z^ʼZÅÊ
ÂaÊÁ{§ µ{Z
]{¿ {Â^¿ Á {Â
¸¹ZÆ·Y ¾Ìv»Ô£-[Ânv» ZÌ
^ÊÀ»Â» {Z§ -Ê·Yʸ Z
ÉZ¿Y |̼m -Á§ ½Z¼Ìa
¸{Y¿^¯Y° - Ê»ZyʬÀÌ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﻲ -ﺷﻜﻮﺭ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﻲﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﻲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﻲ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
»h¸j
»½Y|¬fÀ
]h¸j»YZ
»½Y|¬fÀ
]YZ
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
»h¸j
»½Y|¬fÀ
]h¸j»YZ
»½Y|¬fÀ
]YZ
ﻣﻲ
ﻣﺎﻧﻴﻢ
ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ
ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ:
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
»Ê
»ºÌ¿Z
»fÀ
Ã|ÀËM
»|¼v
:ʼZÅ
½Â»YÌa
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
½Â»YÌaÊ·Y
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
{Ê·Y
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
{
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
ÊZÌ
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
ÊZ̵Z
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
\µZ
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
\ºm
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
ºm
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
18
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
½Â»YÌa
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
½Â»YÌaÊ·Y
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
{Ê·Y
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
{
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
ÊZÌ
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
ÊZ̵Z
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
\µZ
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
\ºm
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
ºm
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
18
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
18
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ
ﻧﻤﺮﻩ
17ﻋﻠﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ؛
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ5454
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭ
ﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺷﺪﻳﻢﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺎﺭ
ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻱ:
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
3838
ﺩﺭ
وﺍﻗﻊ
ﭘﯿﺮ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﺎى
وﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ.ﮐﺸﺘﻰ
ﺑﺎ
ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﻫﺎى
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى
ﺭوﺑﻪ
ﺭو
ﺷﺪ
ﮐﻪ
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ
ﺁﻥ
ﻧﺎﮐﺎﻣﻰ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻟﻤﭙﯿﮏ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﮐﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎى
ﺯﯾﺎﺩى
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
وى
ﮐﺮﺩ.
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺭوﺯى
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﯿﻦ
ﺩﻟﯿﻞ
ﺍو
ﺭﺍ
ﯾﮑﻰ
ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺗﺮﯾﻦ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﺎى
وﺭﺯﺷﻰ
ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦ
ﻣﻰ
ﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺍو
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛
17
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ
و
ﺳﻪ
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺸﺘﻰ.
ﺍو
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﯽ
وﺍﺭﺩ
وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ
ﺷﺪ
ﮐﻪ
ﺍﯾﻦ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ
ﻫﯿﭽﮕﺎﻩ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻧﻤﻰ
ﮐﺮﺩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﺭﺿﺎ
ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ
ﺧﺮﻡ،
ﺟﺰو
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﮐﻪ
ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺩوﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺘﻰ
20ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺭوﺳﺎى
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
وﺭﺯﺵ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
4
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺑﺎ
ﻋﻠﻲ
اﺑﺎﺩﻱ
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
/µÁY
18
»{/1388{Y
/Äv¨100
½Z»Âe1000
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
/µÁY
18
»{/1388{Y
/Äv¨100
½Z»Âe1000
½Z»Z
Ã|¿ÁaÁ
ÉY
]ÉY
¼¸{°
ÉZ«M
¿¼Ã
ʸ17
-É{Z]M
¨54Äv
½Z»Z
¿¹Z
»d¨³Ê|ÀÆ
Á
³
]Z
¾ËYºË|ÌW
]Z
»ª§Â
^
Z
:É|¿ÂyM
¨Äv
38
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
/µÁY
18
»{/1388{Y
/Äv¨100
½Z»Âe1000
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
ÃZ»Ìe/µÁY
/1388
84
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{5/¹Á
»{{Y
/1388
100
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{5/¹Á
»{{Y
/1388
100
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮن
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢاﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢاﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﺮﻡﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻱ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻋﺼﺮ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻧﻴﺎﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻧﻜﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺩﺍﻳﻲ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲ
ﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍن
اﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ
ﻓﺨﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲ
ﻧﻜﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺩﺍﻳﻲ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲ
ﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍن
اﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ
ﻓﺨﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ44
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ
É|¼uY
¿{Y
-
ʼZÅ
§Ê¿ZnÀ
»ÉÁ
]
µY|m
4
Ä·Z
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱ
ﻋﻜﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻋﻜﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.irﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢاﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﺑﺤﺮﺍن
اﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ
ﻓﺨﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺍﺳـﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
ﻧﻜﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺩﺍﻳﻲ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲ
ﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ÊZÌ
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
ÊZ̵Z
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
\µZ
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
\ºm
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
h¸j»ºm
»½Y|¬fÀ
]h¸j»YZ
»½Y|¬fÀ
]YZ
É|¼uY
¿{Y
-
ʼZÅ
§Ê¿ZnÀ
»ÉÁ
]
µY|m
4
Ä·Zﺳﺎﻳــﻪ
ﻫﺎﺳﺎﻳــﻪ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﺎ½Â»YÌa
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
½Â»YÌaÊ·Y
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
{Ê·Y
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
{
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
MOSALAS.IRﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎ
É|¼uY
¿{Y
-
ʼZÅ
§Ê¿ZnÀ
»ÉÁ
]
µY|m
4
Ä·Z
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
M OSAL AS . ri
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
M OSAL AS. ir
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱ
ﻋﻜﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻋﻜﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.irﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢاﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﺑﺤﺮﺍن
اﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ
ﻓﺨﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺍﺳـﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
ﻧﻜﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺩﺍﻳﻲ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲ
ﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ÊZÌ
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
ÊZ̵Z
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
\µZ
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
\ºm
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
h¸j»ºm
»½Y|¬fÀ
]h¸j»YZ
»½Y|¬fÀ
]YZ
É|¼uY
¿{Y
-
ʼZÅ
§Ê¿ZnÀ
»ÉÁ
]
µY|m
4
Ä·Zﺳﺎﻳــﻪ
ﻫﺎﺳﺎﻳــﻪ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﺎ½Â»YÌa
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
½Â»YÌaÊ·Y
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
{Ê·Y
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
{
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
MOSALAS.IRﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
MOSAL AS. ri
ﺪﺭﻱ
ﻱ
ﻴﺢ
ﺼﻴﺢ
ﺼﺭ
ﺎﻋﻴﻞﺑﻨﻓﺪ
ﻒ
ﻋﻴﻞ
ﺩﺭﻳﻓﺎ
ﺠﺎﺑﻨ
ﺳﻤﺎﺑﺎ
ﺠﻒ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺩﺭﻳﻧ
ﺍﺳﻤ
ﺩﺭﻧ
ﻮﺭﺩ
ﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﻭﮔﻮﻣﺑﺎﺍ
ﮔﻔﺖﺩﺭﮔﻔ
ﻧﻤﺎ
ﻋﻜﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻋﻜﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.irﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢاﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﺑﺤﺮﺍن
اﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ
ﻓﺨﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺍﺳـﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
ﻧﻜﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺩﺍﻳﻲ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲ
ﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ÊZÌ
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
ÊZ̵Z
¾Ëe
½Y¯Y
\µZ
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
\ºm
ÉZÅ
{¡Y
¹Zm
h¸j»ºm
»½Y|¬fÀ
]h¸j»YZ
»½Y|¬fÀ
]YZ
É|¼uY
¿{Y
-
ʼZÅ
§Ê¿ZnÀ
»ÉÁ
]
µY|m
4
Ä·Zﺳﺎﻳــﻪ
ﻫﺎﺳﺎﻳــﻪ
ﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﺎ½Â»YÌa
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
½Â»YÌaÊ·Y
¿¼ËZ
{]ÃZ
{Ê·Y
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
{
»ÃZÀ
ÉZÅ
Ê¿ÂË˸e
Äq
.d~³
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
½Â»YÌa
Ä]Y
]YZ
Á
{d·Á
MOSALAS.IRﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.irﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢاﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻓﺼﻴﺢﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺠﻒ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱﺑﺤﺮﺍن
اﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ
ﻓﺨﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻋﺼﺮ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺍﺳـﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
ﻧﻜﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺩﺍﻳﻲ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲ
ﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
MOSALAS.IR
ﻋﻜﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻋﻜﺲ:
ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻗﺎﺋﺪﻱ/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
MOSALAS.IRﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﭘﺸﺖ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﺳﻴﻒ
ﺍﷲ
ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ44
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
{
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
{|Ì¿YÂy
¾ËY
¼ÃZ
»Ê
|Ì¿YÂyﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻧﻴﺎﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻧﻴﺎ]Z
ÊËZÅZf¨³
Z]:Y
ÊËZÅZf¨³
:Yﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮن
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ
ﻭ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻒ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺯﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮن
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ
ﻭ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻒ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﺮﻡﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻱ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺑﺎ:
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻱ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺑﺎ:
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
1212
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
18
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
{
»{Â
¶ÌZ¼Y
§d¨³tÌ
³Á
]Z
¿¦n
{É|À]ZË
:°
¾u
«
Z§/É|WZ
Äf¨Å
[Ây
]Z
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
»h¸j
ZË|À¨/Y|Ë|m
º//q
Ä//ËZ
ZÅ
]ÉZ
]daMOSALAS.IRZ
Ã{a
ÊËY|m
¯Ê¼Ë
Y
¦ÌÌ·Âba
×Y
{{Y
{
Ä
¿¼Z
{
»{Â
¶ÌZ¼Y
§d¨³tÌ
³Á
]Z
¿¦n
{É|À]ZË
:°
¾u
«
Z§/É|WZ
Äf¨Å
[Ây
]Z
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
»h¸j
ZË|À¨/Y|Ë|m
º//q
Ä//ËZ
ZÅ
]ÉZ
]daMOSALAS.IRZ
Ã{a
ÊËY|m
¯Ê¼Ë
Y
¦ÌÌ·Âba
×Y
{{Y
{
Ä
¿¼Z
Äf¨Å
[Ây
]Z
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
»h¸j
ZË|À¨/Y|Ë|m
º//q
MOSALAS.IR
Ĭ¸u
12
:°
¾u
«
Z§/É|WZ
Äf¨Å
[Ây
]Z
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
»h¸j
ZË|À¨/Y|Ë|m
º//q
Ä//ËZ
ZÅ
]ÉZ
]daMOSALAS.IRZ
Ã{a
ÊËY|m
¯Ê¼Ë
Y
¦ÌÌ·Âba
×Y
{{Y
M OSALAS . ir
`?AE3 > 3 E W
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻧﻜﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺩﺍﻳﻲ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲ
ﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍن
اﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏﺑﺎﺑﺎﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﺧﻮﺏ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻓﺨﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲ
ﻧﻜﻮﻧﺎم:
ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺩﺍﻳﻲ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮب
ﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﮐﻪ
اﺳﻤﺎن
ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲ
ﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻮف؛
16
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮگﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎن
ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ،
ﺳﻼم
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍن
اﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎنﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺳﮓ
،
ﺳﻜﻮتﮔﻔﺖ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ
ﻓﺨﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ44
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﻧﻴ ﺪ
ﺧﻮﺍ
ﻣﻲ
ﻣﻲ
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻦﺭﻩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩ ﺭ ﺍ ﻳﻦ ﺍ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
،
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛
ﺷﻬﺮﻙ
ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ44
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ
| Ì¿Ì ¿ÂYÂy
¼Y yÊ »ÃZ Z
{ ¼¾ ËYË Y
ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺧﻮﺏﺑﺎﺑﺎﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﺧﻮﺏ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﺳﮓﺳﺪﻳﻜﻮﻨﻲ
ﺳﻜﻮت
ت
ﺮﺍﻟ،
ﮓ
ﺨ
ﺗﺮﺳﻓن
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﻫﺎﺩ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍ
ﻓﺮﺎ
ﺩﺍنﺗﺌ
ﻭﮔﻮﺑﺎﺑﺎ
ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮ
ﻭﮔﻮ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭ ﮔﻮﺑﺎ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
¿:¹Z¿Â°
ºÌe
{ÊËY
»[Â^v
e
]{Â
ÊËZm
¯Ä
½Z¼M
Y
¿¼Ê
]ÊÀÌ
-¥Â·ÂaÂe
1
{«Ä¬Ì
Ze
»Ê]±
»Â
½YËY
{
«^µZ
»¸¼½Z¿Z
¾Ìq
§ZuY|y
¯,ÄÀÌ]Z
¹Ô
¯ÄÀÌ]Z
]½Yv
Z°Ë»M
{
d¨³½Zf¿Z¤§Y
³Á
]Z
¯½Y{³Z
eZXe
²
,
d¨³c°
³Á
]Z
§{ZÅ
§ÊÀË|·Yz
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
{¾Ì]Á
ÉZÅ
»ÃZ³Y«Ê¨z
-¥Y
Æ
»{Ê]½Z³
¼¸4{°
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
É{Zf«Y
{ÃZ³{Y
»½Z¼Æf
a
Y
cZ]Zzf¿Y
]½Yv
Z°Ë»M
{
d¨³½Zf¿Z¤§Y
³Á
]Z
¯½Y{³Z
eZXe
²
,
d¨³c°
³Á
]Z
§{ZÅ
§ÊÀË|·Yz
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
{¾Ì]Á
ÉZÅ
»ÃZ³Y«Ê¨z
-¥Y
Æ
»{Ê]½Z³
¼¸4{°
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
É{Zf«Y
{ÃZ³{Y
»½Z¼Æf
a
Y
cZ]Zzf¿Y
Ã|¿Áa
ÉY
{]ÃZ
{¾Ì]Á
ÉZÅ
»ÃZ³Y«Ê¨z
-¥Y
Æ
»{Ê]½Z³
¼¸4{°
Ä¿ZzeYÁ
É{Zf«Y
{ÃZ³{Y
»½Z¼Æf
a
Y
cZ]Zzf¿Y
»dÌ «YÁ Y ÃZe { -h¸j
| Ì¿ YÂy Ê
{ »ÃZ¼¾Ë Y
{ | Ì¿ YÂyÊ» Ã Z¼ ¾ ËY
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
{|Ì¿Y ÂyÊ»ÃZ ¼¾ ËY
ﻧﻴﺎ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍض
ﺗﺸﮑﻞ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ:
ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ
ﻣﻨﺪم
ﺁﻳﺖ
ﺍﷲ
ﻣﮑﺎﺭم
ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ:
ﺗﺼﺪﻱ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻼغ
ﺷﺪﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ:
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎم
ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ
ﮐﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻧﻴﺎﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻲﺯ :
ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺯ
ﺑﺎﮔﻔﺘﺎﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳ ﺍ
ﻧﻴﺎ
ﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺁﻝ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ
ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
ﻧﻴﺎﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐ
: YY ÊË ËZÅ
]ZÅ ZfZf¨³¨ Z]Z³
ﻧﻴﺎ
ﻋﺎﺩﻝ
ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻲ
ﭘﻮﺭﻋﺎﺩﻝ
ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻲ
ﭘﻮﺭﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ
ﻃﺒﺎ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ
MOSALAS.IR
ﻃﺒﺎ
YfY
¶°e
ÉZÅ
Y´·ÂY
Á
]Êy
½ZÌ»Zu
{d·Á
É|¼uY
¿{Y
]Ä
YÅ
{·¶Ì
]Ä
»ÊËZ
Ä«Ô
»¹|À
dËM
×Y
»¹Z°
ÉYÌ
É|e
»ÊËZ
»dÌÁ
¿|{Y
»ÊËZ
]Ä
ÌW
ÂƼm
¡Ô]Y
|Ê]YeÂ]Y
¿Ä»Z
»¬¹Z
ȼ
É^Å
»^ÊÀ
]
¯ZÀ
¾fY~³
ÊÌvË
µM
,©ZvY
̻Y
kZu
ÊËZ
×Y|Y
´É{ÓÁY
ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
µÂ,½Z̧ÂW
»\nfÀ
]Y ÊËZÅ Zf¨ ³Z
¿ZÌ
ÊÌvË
µM
,©ZvY
̻Y
kZu
ÊËZ
×Y|Y
´É{ÓÁY
ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
µÂ,½Z̧ÂW
»\nfÀ
]: Y ÊË ZÅ Zf¨³ Z
¿ZÌ
µ{Z
§{ÊÁ
Âa
ÊÌvË
µM
,©ZvY
̻Y
kZu
ÊËZ
×Y|Y
´É{ÓÁY
ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
µÂ,½Z̧ÂW
»\nfÀ
¿ZÌ
µ{Z
§{ÊÁ
Âa
MOSALAS.IR
ISSN: 2008-5281
|Ë|m
MOSALAS.IR
|Ë|m
ZË|À ¨/Y
ﺑﺎ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢاﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻫﺎ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ
ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ؛ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ
ﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ
ﺍژﻩ
ﺍﻱ
اﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢاﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن
ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﺮﻡﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﺮﻡﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﺣﻜﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺧﺮﻡﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻭ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﺩﺖ
ﻫﻢ
ﻗﺒﺎ ﻝ
ﺩﻭﻟ
ﺍﻳﺎنﻳﺎﺩﺭنﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﮕﺮﺍ
ﺶﺮ
ﻮﻟﮕ
اﺭﺍﻳﺻﻮﻟ
ﺯﻩﺍﺻ
ا ﺭﺍﻳﺶﺗﺎ ﺍ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺩﻻﻭﺭ
ﻧﺠﻔﻲ
،
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱﺩﻻﻭﺭ
ﻧﺠﻔﻲ
،
ﻋﻠﻲ
ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺑﻲ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ،
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺑﻲ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ،
ﺍﺳﺪ
ﺍﷲ
ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻣﭽﻴﺎﻥ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ
ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ،
ﺍﺳﺪ
ﺍﷲ
ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻣﭽﻴﺎﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﻧﻮﺩ
ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﻧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻴﻂ
ﺯﻳﺴﺖﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻴﻂ
ﺯﻳﺴﺖﻫﻤﺴﺮ
ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ؛
ﺍﭘﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ
ﺳﻮﻡ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
؟ﻫﻤﺴﺮ
ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ؛
ﺍﭘﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ
ﺳﻮﻡ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
؟
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ
º//q
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ÃZe
¾Ëe
¶Ì¸ve
,ZÅ
ZÅ^y
Á
Y³
ZÅ
Ĭ¸u-Y
|Ë|m
»|ÊfËË
{
{d·Á
{ºÅ
Y|Å
Ä »Zm
Ê»ÔY
»¾Ì|ÀÆ
]Ä
É|¼uY
¿{Y
Ì̤e
{°ËÁ
Ê»Z£
]½Yv
»ÊËZ
ÉZ¨ fY
¨É|¿ÅZ
]¯ÉZÀ
»ÊÀv
ÃY
ÉY
ËYM
ÃZe
½ZËY´·ÂY
{
«^µZ
{d·Á
{ºÅ
»Z|¼v
Ê¿Y{Ë
¹y
{¯f
¸Ê
^,ÂbZ
»¾v
,ºÌ°u
|¼uY
f¯{¹y
ÊÌ
¯,Éf¿Ô
¾v·YÂ]Y
{É{ÁÁY
|¼uY
Á
»É|Æ
,É|ÌÂy
ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
É|u
Ã{Y
ÃZe
¾Ëe
¶Ì¸ve
,ZÅ
ZÅ^y
Á
Y³
ZÅ
Ĭ¸u-Y
|Ë|m
»|ÊfËË
{
{d·Á
{ºÅ
Y|Å
Ä »Zm
Ê»ÔY
»¾Ì|ÀÆ
]Ä
É|¼uY
¿{Y
Ì̤e
{°ËÁ
Ê»Z£
]½Yv
»ÊËZ
ÉZ¨ fY
¨É|¿ÅZ
]¯ÉZÀ
»ÊÀv
ÃY
ÉY
ËYM
ÃZe
½ZËY´·ÂY
{
«^µZ
{d·Á
{ºÅ
»Z|¼v
Ê¿Y{Ë
¹y
{¯f
¸Ê
^,ÂbZ
»¾v
,ºÌ°u
|¼uY
f¯{¹y
ÊÌ
¯,Éf¿Ô
¾v·YÂ]Y
{É{ÁÁY
|¼uY
Á
»É|Æ
,É|ÌÂy
ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
É|u
: Z] h ¸j»ÃËÁÉZ ųÁ d¨ ³
Ã{Y
»¨Ê
ʼZÅ
^Z
{ÁÓ
¿Ê¨n
,
¸Ê
»¶ÌZ¼YÉÆ
¯,ÉiÂ
»|¼v
Ê]¬ Ë
|̼u
¯,½ZËÂeZ
|Y
×Y
]½ZÌr»Y{Z
]{Â
Á
¿^{Â
¿{Â
]Ê
µZË
ÉZÅ
Ê¿Zf]Ze
Ê]½ÂË˸e
¯Ä»Z¿Z
½Z»Z
»Ìv
¼ÅdË
-¾ÌeÂa
ÂeYaY
¹Â
½YËY
.
cZ]Zzf¿Y
¿¹Z
»ÉÁÌaÊ|ÀÆ
»½Y|¬fÀ
{d·Á
{]Ê
ZÁY
ÊfÌÀ»Y
©Y
»Z|¼v
Ê¿Y{Ë
¹y
{¯f
¸Ê
^,ÂbZ
»¾v
,ºÌ°u
|¼uY
f¯{¹y
ÊÌ
¯,Éf¿Ô
¾v·YÂ]Y
{É{ÁÁY
|¼uY
Á
»É|Æ
,É|ÌÂy
ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
É|u
Ã{Y
»¨Ê
ʼZÅ
^Z
{ÁÓ
¿Ê¨n
,
¸Ê
»¶ÌZ¼YÉÆ
¯,ÉiÂ
»|¼v
Ê]¬ Ë
|̼u
¯,½ZËÂeZ
|Y
×Y
]½ZÌr»Y{Z
{ÃZ´fY
:Z ] ÊËZ]ZųÁ
®Ëà Zd¨³
{]ÉYÃ|¿Á
a
:Z] h ¸j »Ã ËÁÉZųÁ d¨³
ﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﺷﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲﺑﺎﺎ :
ﻳﻲ
ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺑ
ﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷ
ﻳﮏ
ﻳﮏ
ﻮﻫﺎ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻭﮔ ﺑ
ﻱﺍﻱ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍ
ﺑﺎ:
ﻣﺜﻠ ﻠﺚ ﺑ ﺎ:
ﻭﻳﮋ ﻩﻣ ﺜ
ﮔﻮﻫﺎﻱﻭﻳﮋ
ﻭﮔ ﻫﻮ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻒ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ
ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ
ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻣﺮگﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﻣﺮگ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ
ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺳﻨﺘﻲﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺳﻨﺘﻲ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻬﻢ
ﻭ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻬﻢ
ﻭ
ﺩﻫﻢ
^Å
½Z^·Z
Ã|¿Áa½Zf¯Za
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»±
Y
É|¼uY
¿{Y
Zf¿Y
ÉZÅ
dY
½ZËY³
ÊfÀ
Ã|¿Áa
¶»Z e
»¸n
]Z
{d·Á
¿ºÆ
Á
{ºÅ
^Å
½Z^·Z
Ã|¿Áa½Zf¯Za
ÉY
{]ÃZ
»±
Y
É|¼uY
¿{Y
Zf¿Y
ÉZÅ
dY
½ZËY³
ÊfÀ
Ã|¿Áa
¶»Z e
»¸n
]Z
{d·Á
¿ºÆ
Á
{ºÅ
| Ì ¿YÂy Ê
»
ÃZ´f
: Z]ÊË
]Y{Z
ZųÁ
®Ë Ãd¨³
Z]{ÉYÃ|¿Áa
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
ÃZ»Ìe/µÁY
/1388
84
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{5/¹Á
»{{Y
/1388
100
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{5/¹Á
»{{Y
/1388
100
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ/
ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭﻝ/
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭم
/
25
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ/1388
100ﺻﻔﺤﻪ/
1000ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
É^y
-
/ʸ̸ve
µZ
Ìa/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{5/¹Á
»{{Y
/1388
100
¨½Z»Âe1000/Äv
Äf¨Å
¿Ä»Z
/ʸ̸ve,É^y
µZ
/µÁY
¼ÃZ
{¹Á
/
25
»{/1388{Y
/Äv¨100
½Z»Âe1000
{ à Z¼¾ËY
ÉZÅ ¹ZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
12
¦Ì¸veÁ Ĭ¸u
~̨Àe Y| ]ºÅ{ÄÀÌ]Z¯ ½Â»YÌaÊ¿ Ä¿Z¼³
] YÊ ËZÅ Zf¨Z³
MOSALAS.IR
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﺋﺪﻱ /
ﺋﺪﻱ
ﺣﺴﻦﺎﻗﺎ
ﻋﻜﺲﺣﺴﻦﻗ
ﻋﻜﺲ:
:
ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
/ﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﺋﺪﻱ /
ﺋﺪﻱ
ﺣﺴﻦﺎﻗﺎ
ﻋﻜﺲﺣﺴﻦﻗ
ﻋﻜﺲ:
:
{ ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
»| Ì¿YÂyÊ
ÉZÅ ¹ZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
12Ĭ¸u
:Z ] h¸ j» à ËÁÉZųÁ d ¨³
12
¦Ì¸veÁ~Ĭ¸u
̨Àe Y| ] ºÅ{ ÄÀ̽»Y
]Z¯ Ìa Ê¿ÄZ¿ ¼³
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ 12
ﺎ:
ﺚ :
ﻣﺜﻠﺚﺑﺎ
ﻣﺜﻠ ﺑ
ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻱﻩﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﮋ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﮔﻔ ﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫ
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﺳـﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ
MOSALAS.IR
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﻳﺪ
MOSALAS.IR
ﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲﺯ:
ﺭﻫﺎ ﻳﻲﺍ
ﮔﻔﺘﺎﻔ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﮔ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﻧﻴﺪ
ﻣﻲ
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩﺧﻮﺍ
ﻦﻣﻲ
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺍ ﻳ
M OSAL AS . ri
ﺑﺤﺮﺍن اﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺩﺭﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎن
-h¸j» Z] ³ Á d¨³ { {Z¼fY ÉY Y ÀÅZ] ÊÀÌ] Ìa
ÉY ¨¿ 5ZË4
¿¼|¿ÁMÊ
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ»ÃZ¼¾ËY
ÉÌ´¿ZÆm ©ZvY
^¾Ì¼¿Ê¼Ì¸
Z
Éi¯ ¶ÌZ¼Y - Éf¿Ô¯ ÊÌ
ÉÁÆ] ºË» - Ê«e Z|̼u
]ʼ̸ ¾Ìu - ÁZ¯ ¾¼Æ
É{ÓÁY´ ×Y|Y
Ê«{Z |¼v»Ì»Ô
¸Ê¿Y{Ë Z - Ê¿Z¼u Ê
·|Ì Ê¸- Ã{YÊÌvË µÔm
ÉZËÆ Ê¸ ÀÌu
ÄÌZua Ä»Z¿ ®Ë-d»|y d·Á{ Ze Z¯ d·Á{ Y
½Z» { Z¼Ì - Z°Ë»M Á ½YËY Ä]Y
¿Á |Ë|m ÌW -ÄÀÌ]Z¯ { ½Z
]YÊËZÅÉZf¨³Z
»É|¿» Z̸- ÉY|¼f Ë|¼v
»Z^y Z|¼v» - ɯZ Ê^fn
»½ZÌÆ·YÃÅ- ÊËZ Z|¼v
ÂaÌ¿ |¼v»- ¹|¬»Ê»Y³¶ÌZ¼Y
¿ÉZzf§YÄ·Ó- Ê]Ye×Y
,661 026$/$6,5
ºÅ{ Á ºÆ¿ d·Á{ Z] ¸n» ¶»Z e Ã|¿Áa
ÊfÀ ½ZËY³dYÉZÅZf¿Y
{Y¿É|¼uY Y
±» ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
½Zf¯Za ½Z^·Z^Å
]©Y ÊfÌÀ»YZÁY Ê
{ d·Á{ ½Y|¬fÀ» ÉÁÌa
Ê|ÀÆ»¹Z¿ cZ]Zzf¿Y
. ½YËY ¹Â ÂeYaY -¾ÌeÂa ¼Å
]dË Ìv» ½Z»ZÄ»Z¿Z¯ Ê
]½ÂË˸eÊ¿Zf]ZeÉZŵZËÊ
]{¿ {Â^¿ Á {Â
¸¹ZÆ·Y ¾Ìv»Ô£ -[Ânv»ZÌ
^ÊÀ»Â» {Z§-Ê·Y ʸ Z
ÉZ¿Y |̼m -Á§½Z¼Ìa
ÉZŹZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
¦Ì¸ve Á ~̨Àe Y | ] ºÅ{ ÄÀÌ]Z¯ ½Â»YÌa Ê¿Ä¿Z¼³
12 Ĭ¸u
ÃZ´fY{Z] ®Ë ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
:Z] h¸j» ÃËÁ ÉZųÁd¨³
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
Ã{YÉ|u ºZ¬·YÂ]Y ,É|ÌÂy É|Æ» Á |¼uY
{¯É{ÁÁY{ ¾v·YÂ]Y ,Éf¿Ô¯ ÊÌ f
{¯¹y |¼uY ,ºÌ°u ¾v» ,ÂbZ^ ʸ f
»¹yÊ¿Y{Ë Z|¼v
½ZÌr»Y{Z] ×Y|Y ,½ZËÂeZ¯ |̼u
Ê]¬ Ë |¼v» ,Éi¯¶ÌZ¼Y
{ÉÆ» ʸ , ʨn¿ ÁÓ
»¨Z^ʼZÅÊ
ÂaÊÁ{§ µ{Z
]YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
¸{Y¿^¯Y°- Ê»ZyʬÀÌ
»dÌ «YÁ Y ÃZe { -h¸j
ZÌ¿\nfÀ» µÂ,½Z̧ÂW ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
É{ÓÁY´ ×Y|Y
ÊËZkZu Ì»Y ,©ZvYµM ÊÌvË
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ»ÃZ¼¾ËY
ÉZÅ ¹ZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
12 Ĭ¸ u
12 Ĭ¸u
º//q
026$/$6,5
|Ë|m
h¸j» Ä»Z¿ Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
026$/$6,5
| Ë| m
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
ZË|À¨/Y
{ ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
»|Ì¿YÂyÊ
ºÅ{ Á ºÆ¿ d·Á{ Z] ¸n» ¶»Z e Ã|¿Áa
ÊfÀ½ZËY³dY ÉZÅZf¿Y
{Y¿É|¼uYY
±» ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
½Zf¯Za ½Z^·Z^Å
]©Y ÊfÌÀ»Y ZÁYÊ
{ d·Á{ ½Y|¬fÀ»ÉÁÌa
Ê|ÀÆ»¹Z¿ cZ]Zzf¿Y
. ½YËY ¹ÂÂeYaY -¾ÌeÂa ¼Å
]dË Ìv»½Z»ZÄ»Z¿Z¯Ê
]½ÂË˸eÊ¿Zf]ZeÉZŵZËÊ
{cZ]Zzf¿Y Y a ½Z¼Æf» ÃZ³{Y
]É{Zf«Y Ä¿ZzeYÁ4{°¸¼ Ê
«½Z³{» Æ -¥Y ÃZ³Y
ʨz» ÉZžÌ]Á{ ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Z¼¿ Ä { {Y{ ×Y¦Ì
Ì·Âba Y ʼ˯ ÊËY|m Ã{ada
º//q
026$/$6,5
| Ë| m
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
ZË|À¨/ Y
]Z] ÉZ
ZÅ Ä//ËZ
]{¿ {Â^¿ Á {Â
MOSALAS.IR
ÉZŹZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
¦Ì¸ve Á ~̨Àe Y | ] ºÅ{ ÄÀÌ]Z¯ ½Â»YÌa Ê¿Ä¿Z¼³
12 Ĭ¸u
ÃZ´fY{Z] ®Ë ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
:Z] h¸j» ÃËÁ ÉZųÁd¨³
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
Ã{YÉ|u ºZ¬·YÂ]Y ,É|ÌÂy É|Æ» Á |¼uY
{¯É{ÁÁY{ ¾v·YÂ]Y ,Éf¿Ô¯ ÊÌ f
{¯¹y |¼uY ,ºÌ°u ¾v» ,ÂbZ^ ʸ f
»¹yÊ¿Y{Ë Z|¼v
½ZÌr»Y{Z] ×Y|Y ,½ZËÂeZ¯ |̼u
Ê]¬ Ë |¼v» ,Éi¯¶ÌZ¼Y
{ÉÆ» ʸ , ʨn¿ ÁÓ
»¨Z^ʼZÅÊ
ÂaÊÁ{§ µ{Z
]:Y ÊËZÅZf¨³Z
ZÌ¿\nfÀ» µÂ,½Z̧ÂW ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
É{ÓÁY´ ×Y|Y
ÊËZkZu Ì»Y ,©ZvYµM ÊÌvË
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
]¯ÉYÃY ÊÀv» ÉZÀ
12 Ĭ¸u
º//q
MOSALAS.IR
| Ë| m
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
ZË|À¨/Y
MOSALAS.IR
| Ë| m
h¸j» Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å Z] [Ây Äf¨Å
-Y
]ÊËZ» ½Yv
Ê»Z£ {°ËÁ Ì̤e
É|¿ÅZ¨ÉZ¨ fY
{Y¿É|¼uY Ä] ¾Ì|ÀÆ» Ê»ÔY Ä »Zm Y|Å
ºÅ{ d·Á{ { ÊfËË|» |Ë|m Ĭ¸u
ÊÀË|·Yz§ {Zŧ Z] ³Ád¨³
c° ,² eZXe ½Y{³Z¯ Z] ³Ád¨³
]½Zf¿Z¤§Y { Z°Ë»M ½Yv
É|À]ZË{ ¦n¿ Z] ³Ád¨³
{ »ţ ¶ÌZ¼Y {Â
º//q
ZË|À¨/Y
Ã{YÉ|uºZ¬·YÂ]Y,É|ÌÂyÉ|Æ»Á|¼uY
{¯É{ÁÁY{¾v·YÂ]Y,Éf¿Ô¯ÊÌf
{¯¹y|¼uY,ºÌ°u¾v»,ÂbZ^ʸf
»¹yÊ¿Y{ËZ|¼v
ºÅ{ d·Á{ µZ^« { ½ZËY´·ÂY ÃZe ËYM
|Ë|m
{ |Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
]Z] ÉZ
ZÅÄ//ËZ
º//q
Z]h¸j»ÃËÁÉZųÁd¨³
{cZ]Zzf¿Y Y a ½Z¼Æf» ÃZ³{Y
]É{Zf«Y Ä¿ZzeYÁ4{°¸¼ Ê
«½Z³{» Æ -¥Y ÃZ³Y
ʨz» ÉZžÌ]Á{ ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Z¼¿ Ä { {Y{ ×Y¦Ì
Ì·Âba Y ʼ˯ ÊËY|m Ã{ada
Z§/ É|WZ¾u
«
°
:
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺩﺭ
ﺩ ﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﻧﻴ ﺪ
ﻣﻲﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍ
ﺍﺑﻬﺎمﻫﺎﻱ
ﮐﻬﺮﻳﺰک
ﺍﺑﻬﺎم
ﺪ ﺗﺯ ﻨﻔ ﻴﺬ ﺗﺤﻠﻴ ﻒ
ﻲ ﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮنﮐﺑﺎ ﻴﻨﻪﺩﻫﻢﺑ ﻌﺍ
ﻧﻪ ﻧ ﭘ
ﮔﻤ ﺎﺯ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ 12
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ
ﺤﻒ
ﻠﻴﻒ
ﺤﻠﻴ
ﻔﻴﺬ ﻭﺗﻭ
ﺍﺯﻨﻔﻴﺗﻨ ﺗﺬ
ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻴﻨﻪﺪﺗﺍﺯ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻌ
ﮐﺎﺑن
ﻴﻨﻪﺩ
ﺮﺍﻣﻮ
ﺯﻧﻲ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﮐﺎﺑ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﻧﺯﻲﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮنﭘﻴ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
:
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺧﻮﺏﺑﺎﺑﺎﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﺧﻮﺏ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
M OSA LAS. ir
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388 ÂËÆ µÁY/ ¹Â ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
:Z]ÊËZųÁ d¨³
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388{Y{» 25 / ¹Á{ ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^y Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å
{ÃZ¼¾ËY
»|Ì¿YÂyÊ
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388{Y{» 25 / ¹Á{ ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^y Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å
Z §/É|ZW «¾u : °
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
MOSALAS.IR
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ-ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ ﻣﻮﻣﻨﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻌﻠﻲﺯﺍﻟﻲ -ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ
ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﺯﺵ -ﺟﻤﺸﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ 12
ﭼــﺸﻢ
ﺍﺳـﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ
MOSALAS.IR
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻋﺼﺮ
ﭼــﺸﻢ
ﺍﺳـﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺳﺎﻳــﻪﻫﺎ
ﺳﺎﻳــﻪ
ÌW Z] ³ Ád¨³
Ê|ÀÆ» ¹Z¿ ½Z»Z
¨54Äv
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388{Y{» 18 /µÁY ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
{Ã
¼Z
Ì a
µ
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
»¹|¬»ÊuZ^» Z»Ô£ - ¾°Å¯ ¾v
À»¾ËM {YÂm - Ê»¯Y ºZ¯|Ì
½Z̨ÂË ×Yc - \Ì° üu
¾Ì»Y wÅZ -ÊÅÔ» |¼v» - Ê|¬» É{ZÅ
»Ê ̨ }¿ - É°eʼZÅ É|Æ
»Â¿ZÆm Z|¼v» - ½Z¼Ë¿ ¾v
ÉZ¿Y ʸ - ÊfËY|Å ¾Ìu
ÉY ¨¿ 5ZË4
¿¼|¿ÁMÊ
ÉÌ´¿ZÆm ©ZvY
^¾Ì¼¿Ê¼Ì¸
Z
Éi¯ ¶ÌZ¼Y - Éf¿Ô¯ ÊÌ
ÉÁÆ] ºË» - Ê«e Z|̼u
]ʼ̸ ¾Ìu - ÁZ¯ ¾¼Æ
É{ÓÁY´ ×Y|Y
Ê«{Z |¼v»Ì»Ô
¸Ê¿Y{Ë Z - Ê¿Z¼u Ê
·|Ì Ê¸ -Ã{YÊÌvË µÔm
ÉZËÆ Ê¸ ÀÌu
»É|¿» Z̸- ÉY|¼f Ë|¼v
»Z^y Z|¼v» -ɯZ Ê^fn
{ÃZ¼¾ËY
»|Ì¿YÂyÊ
ÃZ´fY{Z] ®Ë ÃZ]{ ÉYÃ|¿Áa
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ -ﺯﻫﺮﻩﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﻥ
ﮔﺮﺍﻣﻲﻣﻘﺪﻡ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻧﺼﻴﺮﭘﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞﮔﺮﺍﻣﻲ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ
ﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ -ﻻﻟﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻧﻮﺩ
MOSALAS.IR
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲﺑﺎ:
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻣﭽﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺑﻲ
ﺩﻻﻭﺭ ﻧﺠﻔﻲ ،ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﻃﺒﺎ
ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻲﭘﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ4ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛ ﺷﻬﺮﻙ ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﻱﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﻔﻲ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﻴﻒﺍﷲ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻤﺎ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ
ﭘﺸﺖﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﭘﺸﺖ
MOSALAS .ir
¨44Äv
¿ÉY]Ê^mº¿Zy
dY¹fv»½Z{Ây
¨88Äv
¨38 Äv
{°¸¼ ÉY] ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Á ½Z»Z
^É|¿ÂyM
Z
ª§Â»Z]¾ËY
|ºË
¨38Äv
»
¹Á
½YËÁ j¯Y
|ÀfÌ¿ t¸Y
½ ÉYÁ [Zzf¿Y ] µZnÀm
½Zf¿Z¤§Y cZ]Zzf¿Y { \¸¬eÄ^WZ
½ZÌ]Yv»Á É{Z]M ʸº¯ ¿Z
]YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
©ZvYµM ÊÌvË - Ê«{Z |¼v»Ì»LÔ
{³{Ó§ Z|̼u -É^À« ÂËY
ÊËZm
Z^ - ¹Ô¯Z^Ë ©{Z
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388{Y{» 25 / ¹Á{ ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^y Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å
ÉZŹZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ:
ﺍﺯﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ-ﻳﮏ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ -ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ -ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻱ -ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎﻣﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ
ﻣﺠﺘﺒﻲ ﺷﺎﻛﺮﻱ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺧﺒﺎﺯ
ﻣﺠﺘﺒﻲ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﻧﻈﺎﻡﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ
ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ؛ ﺍﭘﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﺳﻮﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ؟
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲﺑﺎ:
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻣﭽﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺑﻲ
ﺩﻻﻭﺭ ﻧﺠﻔﻲ ،ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﻃﺒﺎ
ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻲﭘﻮﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻧﻮﺩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻳﮏ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﺎ:
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻣﻬﺪﻱﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦﺣﻜﻴﻢ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺧﺮﻡ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻋﻠﻲﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻋﻠﻲ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲﺧﺮﻡ
ﺑﺎﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ:
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐﻧﻴﺎ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺣﺎﺝﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﺁﻝﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﻳﺤﻴﻲﺁﻝ
ﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ ﺍژﻩﺍﻱ
ﺍﺯ؛
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱﺻﻔﺎﺭﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ ﻓﺨﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﮐﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍن ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺳﮓ ،ﺳﻜﻮت
ﺑﺤﺮﺍن اﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎن
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺠﻒ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪﺭﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻓﺼﻴﺢ
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
§¥Â¸Ì
{|Ä¿Zzf·Y
{»Ìa
|Âmd·Y
¿´\¿Ê·Z ʨ»Ì» ʳ|¿ Ä] ÊÅZ
§Â·ÂmMļZ
»Ê¼ZÅ|¼v
»Ã|ÀËMfÀ
»ºÌ¿Z»Ê
¸-É{Z]MÊ
ü¿ÉZ«M
»:ʼZÅ |¼v
»Ã|ÀËM fÀ
»ºÌ¿Z»Ê
¸-É{Z]MÊ
17 ü¿ ÉZ«M
{°¸¼ ÉY] ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Á ½Z»Z
^:É|¿ÂyM
Z
ª§Â» Z]¾ËY
|ºË
ÌW Z] ³ Ád¨³
Ê|ÀÆ» ¹Z¿ ½Z»Z
¨54Äv
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388{Y{» 18 /µÁY ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^y Ä»Z¿Äf¨Å
{{Y
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ»ÃZ¼¾ËY
{Y¿ É|¼uY d·Á{ Ze É» d·Á{ Y
{Z¼fY ÉY ÉY] ½YËÁ Ê]Ó
¿{ZYcYÁÄÀ˳YÊËZÅÄf¨³ Z
».|ÀÀ¯Ê» Äq Á { ½YY{ÄËZ
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
ﮔﻮﺑﺎﺑﺎﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﻭﮔﻮ
ﺩﺭﮔﻔﺖ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﻱﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮﺍﺯﺍﺯﺭﺍﻱ
ﺑﻴﻨﻲﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ
ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﭘﻴﺶ
4ﻳﺎ 5ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍﻱ
ﻧﻤﻲاﻭﺭﻧﺪ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮﻱ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲ ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ -ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﻛﻮﺛﺮﻱ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ -ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ -ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﻋﻼﻣﻴﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻲ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻲ -ﺭﺿﺎ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ
ﺟﻼﻝ ﻳﺤﻴﻲﺯﺍﺩﻩ -ﻋﻠﻲﺳﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮ
ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻌﻠﻲ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭیﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ:
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺮگ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻳﮏ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﺎ:
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ
ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﭘﻮﺗﻴﻦ؛ ﺍﭘﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ؟
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱ
ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻭ ﻭﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ
ﻋﻴﺴﻲﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻋﻴﺴﻲ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻣﺤﺴﻦﺣﻜﻴﻢ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺧﺮﻡ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،ﻣﺤﺴﻦ
ﻋﻠﻲﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻋﻠﻲ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲﺧﺮﻡ
ﺍﺳـﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
»¹|¬»ÊuZ^» Z»Ô£ - ¾°Å¯ ¾v
À»¾ËM {YÂm - Ê»¯Y ºZ¯|Ì
½Z̨ÂË ×Yc - \Ì° üu
¾Ì»Y wÅZ -ÊÅÔ» |¼v» - Ê|¬» É{ZÅ
»Ê ̨ }¿ - É°eʼZÅ É|Æ
»Â¿ZÆm Z|¼v» - ½Z¼Ë¿ ¾v
ÉZ¿Y ʸ - ÊfËY|Å ¾Ìu
]YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
{ :|Ì¿YÂyÊ» ÃZ¼ ¾ËY
ÄÌZua Ä»Z¿ ®Ë-d»|y d·Á{ Ze Z¯ d·Á{ Y
½Z» { Z¼Ì - Z°Ë»M Á ½YËY Ä]Y
¿Á |Ë|m ÌW - ÄÀÌ]Z¯ { ½Z
ºÅ{ÁºÆ¿d
·Á{Z]¸n»¶»Z eÃ|¿Áa
ÊfÀ½ZËY³dYÉZÅZf¿Y
{Y¿É|¼uYY
±»ÃZ]{ÉYÃ|¿Áa
½Zf¯Za½Z^·Z^Å
]©YÊfÌÀ»YZÁYÊ
{d·Á{½Y|¬fÀ»ÉÁÌa
Ê|ÀÆ»¹Z¿cZ]Zzf¿Y
.½YËY¹ÂÂeYaY-¾ÌeÂa¼Å
]dËÌv»½Z»ZÄ»Z¿Z¯Ê
]½ÂË˸eÊ¿Zf]ZeÉZŵZËÊ
]{¿{Â^¿Á{Â
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388 ÂËÆ 8 /¹ZÆq ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
ÉÆ» ʸ Z] ³ Á d¨³ { YÁ [Zzf¿Y Ã{a da
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388 ÂËÆ µÁY / ¹Â ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
-h¸j» Z] ³ Á d¨³ { {Z¼fY ÉY Y ÀÅZ] ÊÀÌ] Ìa
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻮم /ﺍﻭﻝ ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ:
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻭم 25 /ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﺑﻬﺎمﻫﺎﻱ
ﮐﻬﺮﻳﺰک
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻒ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮنﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺯﻧﻲﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮن
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱﺑﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺳﺎﻳــﻪﻫﺎ
ﻫﺎ
ﺳﺎﻳــﻪ
½YËÁ j¯Y
|ÀfÌ¿ t¸Y
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ»ÃZ¼¾ËY
{Y¿ É|¼uY d·Á{ Ze É» d·Á{ Y
{Z¼fY ÉY ÉY] ½YËÁ Ê]Ó
½ ÉYÁ [Zzf¿Y ] µZnÀm
½Zf¿Z¤§YcZ]Zzf¿Y {\¸¬eÄ^WZ
½ZÌ]Yv» Á É{Z]M ʸ º¯ ¿Z
¿{ZY cYÁÄÀ˳ Y ÊËZÅÄf¨³ Z
».|ÀÀ¯Ê» Äq Á { ½YY{ÄËZ
©ZvYµM ÊÌvË - Ê«{Z |¼v»Ì»LÔ
{³{Ó§ Z|̼u -É^À« ÂËY
ÊËZm
Z^ - ¹Ô¯Z^Ë ©{Z
É{Á»ɴ -ÊÀÌu {Z¼|Ì
§½ZËÂeZ¯ Z|̼u -|¿ÂÀu ½Á|Ë
©{Z É|Æ» - Ê¿Z¼u ºZ¬·YÂ]Y
»ÂbZ^ ʸ - ɸÅ{ ¾Ìu Z|¼v
»ÉÌ¿ ×Y| - Ê»ÔY ¾v
¸ÊËYÌ» Ê
-h¸j» Z] ³ Á d¨³ { {Z¼fY ÉY Y ÀÅZ] ÊÀÌ] Ìa
ÉY ¨¿ 5ZË4
¿¼|¿ÁMÊ
ÉÌ´¿ZÆm ©ZvY
^¾Ì¼¿Ê¼Ì¸
Z
Éi¯ ¶ÌZ¼Y - Éf¿Ô¯ ÊÌ
ÉÁÆ] ºË» - Ê«e Z|̼u
]ʼ̸ ¾Ìu - ÁZ¯ ¾¼Æ
É{ÓÁY´ ×Y|Y
Ê«{Z |¼v»Ì»Ô
¸Ê¿Y{Ë Z - Ê¿Z¼u Ê
·|Ì Ê¸ - Ã{YÊÌvË µÔm
ÉZËÆ Ê¸ ÀÌu
{ÃZ¼¾ËY
»|Ì¿YÂyÊ
½Z»Âe
Äv¨
{Y{»
µÁYÃZ¼
µÁYµZ
ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
¦Ì¸veÁ~̨ÀeY| ]ºÅ{ÄÀÌ]Z¯½Â»YÌaÊ¿Ä¿Z¼³
Ĭ¸u
MOSALAS .ir
026$/$6,5
ºÅ{d·Á{µZ^«{½ZËY´·ÂYÃZeËYM
|Ë|m
]YÊËZÅZf¨³Z
ZÌ¿\nfÀ»µÂ,½Z̧ÂWºZ¬·YÂ]Y
É{ÓÁY´×Y|Y
ÊËZkZuÌ»Y,©ZvYµMÊÌvË
h¸j»Ä»Z¿Äf¨ÅZ][ÂyÄf¨Å
-YZÅ Y³ÁZÅ^y,ZŶ ̸ve¾ËeÃZe
]ÊËZ»½Yv
]¯ÉYÃYÊÀv»ÉZÀ
Ê»Z£{°ËÁÌ̤e
É|¿ÅZ¨ÉZ¨ fY
{Y¿É|¼uYÄ]¾Ì|ÀƻʻÔYÄ »ZmY|Å
ºÅ{d·Á{{ÊfËË|»|Ë|mĬ¸u
{|Ì¿YÂyÊ»ÃZ¼¾ËY
Z §
É|ZW «¾u °
MOSALAS.IR
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ 18 /ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱﺭﺍﺳﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥﺳﻨﺘﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺮگ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ 12
ﺑﺎﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ:
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388 ÂËÆ 8 /¹ZÆq ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
ÉÆ» ʸ Z] ³ Á d¨³ { YÁ [Zzf¿Y Ã{a da
½Z»Âe1000 /Äv¨100 /1388 ÂËÆ µÁY/ ¹Â ÃZ¼ /µÁY µZ /ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
:Z] ÊËZųÁ d¨³
]:YÊËZÅÉZf¨³ Z
»É|¿»Z̸-ÉY|¼f Ë |¼v
»Z^y Z|¼v» - ɯZ Ê^fn
»½ZÌÆ·Y ÃÅ - ÊËZ Z|¼v
ÂaÌ¿ |¼v» - ¹|¬»Ê»Y³ ¶ÌZ¼Y
¿ÉZzf§Y Ä·Ó - Ê]Ye ×Y
¸¹ZÆ·Y¾Ìv»Ô£ -[Ânv»ZÌ
^ÊÀ»Â» {Z§ -Ê·Y ʸ Z
ÉZ¿Y |̼m -Á§ ½Z¼Ìa
¸{Y¿^¯Y° -Ê»ZyʬÀÌ
½Z»Âe
Äv¨
{Y{»
¹Á{ÃZ¼
µÁYµZ
ʸ̸ve,É^yÄ»Z¿Äf¨Å
½ZÌr»Y{Z]×Y|Y,½ZËÂeZ¯|̼u
Ê]¬ Ë|¼v»,Éi¯¶ÌZ¼Y
{Éƻʸ,ʨn¿ÁÓ
»¨Z^ʼZÅÊ
ÂaÊÁ{§µ{Z
Á
Yµ
Z
Ê
¸Ì ¸v
e
É
ÌW Z] ³ Ád¨³
Ê|ÀÆ» ¹Z¿ ½Z»Z
¨54Äv
ﮔﻔﺖﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ54
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ54
54
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺍﺑﻬﺎمﻫﺎﻱ
ﮐﻬﺮﻳﺰک
ﺍﺯ ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻒ
ﺑﻌﺪﺍﺯ
ﺩﻫﻢﺑﻌﺪ
ﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﺩﻫﻢ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮنﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺯﻧﻲﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮن
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ 12
اﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎن ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ
ﻋﺼﺮﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ÉZÅÊ]ÓÄ] ¸n»Ê·Ôm
É
¿ |Å{ʼ¿ÉYº·ZZ
¨44Äv
¨88Äv
8
¨Äv
{°¸¼ÉY]ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Á½Z»Z
É{Z]MʸZ]µZ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰ ﺧﺮﻡ،ﺟﺰوﻣﺪﯾﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﮐﻪﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩوﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺘﻰ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭوﺳﺎىﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ وﺭﺯﺵ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥوﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝ و ﺳﻪﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﮐﺸﺘﻰ ﺍو ﺯﻣﺎﻧﯽوﺍﺭﺩ وﺍﻟﯿﺒﺎﻝﺷﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺍﯾﻦﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥ ﻫﯿﭽﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﮐﺮﺩ
ﺭوﺯى ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﯿﻦﺩﻟﯿﻞ ﺍو ﺭﺍ ﯾﮑﻰ ﺍﺯﻣﻮﻓﻖﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﺭوﺳﺎى ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥﻫﺎى وﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺗﺎﺭﯾﺦﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍو ﺩﺭ
ﮐﺸﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎى ﺯﯾﺎﺩى ﺭوﺑﻪﺭو ﺷﺪ ﮐﻪﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﮐﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻤﭙﯿﮏ ﺑﻮﺩ ﮐﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎىﺯﯾﺎﺩى ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪوى ﮐﺮﺩ ﯾﺰﺩﺍﻧﻰﺧﺮﻡ
ﺩﺭ وﺍﻗﻊ ﭘﯿﺮ ﺭوﺳﺎى ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﯿﻮﻥﻫﺎى وﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ÌWZ]³Ád¨³
Ê|ÀÆ»¹Z¿½Z»Z
¨Äv
ÃZ´fY{Z]®ËÃZ]{ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Z]ÊËZųÁd¨³
^y
Ȁ
¿Z
Ä f
¨Å
¨38 Äv
^É|¿ÂyM
Z
ª§Â»Z]¾ËY
|ºË
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ44
44
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﻱ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺭﺟﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪﺖ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ88
8
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ 38
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻱ:
ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺷﺪﻳﻢ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ 38
ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐﻧﻴﺎ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،ﺭﺳﻮﻝ
ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ
ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺣﺎﺝﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﺁﻝﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ،
ﻳﺤﻴﻲﺁﻝ
ﻳﺤﻴﻲ
ZfyZÊÀÌu
ºÅ{Ê»Ì̤eYÄ¿ZzeYÁ
{]®Ë]Y
|ÀÀ¯Ê» ÊËZ¼À³] d·Á{ ÉZÅÄ¿Z Êf«Á
§¥Â¸Ì
{ |Ä¿Zzf·Y
{»Ìa
|Âm d·Y
¿´\¿Ê·Z ʨ»Ì» ʳ|¿ Ä] ÊÅZ
§:·ÂmMļZ
]ÉY
¿ É Ê^m º¿Zy
dY
d ¹fv» ½Z{Ây
»Ê¼ZÅ|¼v
»Ã|ÀËMfÀ
»ºÌ¿Z»Ê
¸-É{Z]MÊ
ü¿ÉZ«M
Á
^É|¿ÂyM
Z
ª§Â»Z]¾ËY
|ºË
ÉZŹZÆ]Y
¯ËÆ
Äv
¨
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻟﺒﻪ ﺗﻴﻎ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ 18ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ
14ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﻳﻊﺍﻟﺴﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲﺩﺭﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ»ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪﺩﺭﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ«
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺗﻜﺎﻧﻲﺑﺰﺭگﺩﺭﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖﺑﺪﻧﻲ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪﻫﺎﻱﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲﺑﺎ:
ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺟﻮ
ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲﻋﺎﻟﻲﻧﺴﺐ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲﺑﻪﺑﻪﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ
ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻪﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ:
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ:
ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻴﻢ
ﻋﻠﻲﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ؛
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺮﻩ17
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ:
ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻴﻢ
ﻋﻠﻲﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ؛
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺮﻩ 17
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻱ:
ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﺷﺪﻳﻢ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻭم 25 /ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ-ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﺴﻦﺣﻜﻴﻢ-ﻋﺒﺎﺱﺳﻠﻴﻤﻲﻧﻤﻴﻦ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻱ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻱﻓﺮ -ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﻲ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ -ﺑﻴﮋﻥ ﺯﻧﮕﻨﻪ -ﻣﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻲﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ -ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻓﺎﺋﻘﻲ
ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻋﻠﻴﭙﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻠﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭیﻫﺎﻳﻲﺍﺯ:
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻱ-ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎﻣﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﻣﺠﺘﺒﻲ ﺷﺎﻛﺮﻱ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺧﺒﺎﺯ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ -ﺯﻫﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﻬﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﮔﺮﺍﻣﻲﻣﻘﺪﻡ -ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﺼﻴﺮﭘﻮﺭ
ﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲ -ﻻﻟﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﻱ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎﻣﺤﺠﻮﺏ -ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻌﻠﻲ ﺯﺍﻟﻲ -ﻓﺮﺷﺎﺩ ﻣﻮﻣﻨﻲ
ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﺯﺵ -ﺟﻤﺸﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ
ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﻲ -ﺷﻜﻮﺭﺍﻛﺒﺮﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻋﻠﻴﻨﻘﻲﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﻲ
MOSALAS.IR
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ 18 /ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﭘﺲﺍﺯﺍﺯﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥﭘﺲ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ4ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩﺍﺷﺮﻑ؛ ﺷﻬﺮﻙ ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﻔﻲ
ﺍﻱﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﻴﻒﺍﷲ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻤﺎ
ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺍﺯﺍﺯﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ
ﭘﺸﺖﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﭘﺸﺖ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲﺑﺎ:
½Z
»Â
e
MOSALAS.IR
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﻱ
ﺟﻼﻟﻲ :ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻻﺑﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﺎﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭم 8 /ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 100 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﭘﺸﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ؛ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
168ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻳﻚ
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺟﻮ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻴﺮﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﻋﺎﻟﻲﻧﺴﺐ
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ44
44
ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
{
ISSN: 2008-5281
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ:
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴﻴﻦﺧﺴﺮﻭﭘﻨﺎﻩ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻘﻴﻤﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ ،ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻡ ،ﺭﺿﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺧﺎﻧﻠﻮ
ﻋﻠﻲﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ،
ﻧﺠﻒ ﻟﮏﺯﺍﻳﻲ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﻼﻣﺘﻲ
ﺍﻛﺮﻣﻲ ،ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻏﺮﻭﻳﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻛﺮﻣﻲ،
ﺣﺠﺖ ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﻴﺮﺗﺎﺝﺍﻟﺪﻳﻨﻲ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺗﻘﻲ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻋﻠﻲﺁﺑﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺰﺭگ
Ä
ﺟﺪ ﺪﻯ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺸﻢ 22 /ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺻﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ
ﻒ
ﻣﻨﺘﺠﺐﻧﻴﺎ :ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺧﺒﺮﻱ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ /ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ /ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩﭘﻨﺠﻢ 15 /ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 116 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ1000 /ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
¿¼Z
ﺮ ﻱ ﺷﺘﺮ ﻙ
ﻣﺠ ﻪ ﻛ ﻤﻪ
»ﻣﺜ ﺚ«ﺭ ﻪﺷﻤ ﺭﻩ
30008312
SMSﻛﻨﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﻉﻭ ﺖ
ﺟﺰﻭﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛ ﻥﻣﺠ ﻪ
ﺷﻮ ﺪ
ﮔ ﺖ ﮔﻮﻫ ﻲ
{cZ]Zzf¿YYa½Z¼Æf»ÃZ³{Y
]É{Zf«YÄ¿ZzeYÁ{°¸¼Ê
«½Z³{»Æ-¥YÃZ³Y
ʨz»ÉZžÌ]Á{ÃZ]{ÉYÃ|¿Áa
Z¼¿Ä{{Y{×Y¦Ì
Ì·ÂbaYʼ˯ÊËY|mÃ{ada
ÊÀË|·Yz§{ZŧZ]³Ád¨³
c°,²eZXe½Y{³Z¯Z]³Ád¨³
]½Zf¿Z¤§Y{Z°Ë»M½Yv
É|À]ZË{¦n¿Z]³Ád¨³
{»ţ¶ÌZ¼Y{Â
º//q
026$/$6,5
| Ë| m
h¸j»Ä»Z¿Äf¨ÅZ][ÂyÄf¨Å
ZË|À¨/Y
]Z]ÉZ
ZÅÄ//ËZ
`W
ZË|À¨/Y
¾fY~³ZÀ¯]ÊÀ^»É^ź »¹Z¬»Ä»Z¿Ê]YeÂ]Y
»|¡Ô]YÂƼmÌWÄ]ÊËZ
{Y|¿dÌÁ»ÊËZ»É|eÉY̹Z°»×YdËM
¹|À»Ä«ÔÊËZ»Ä]¶Ì·{YÅÄ]{Y¿É|¼uY
d·Á{½ZÌ»ZuÊy]ÁY´·ÂYÉZŶ°eYfY
ÄÀÌ]Z¯¹Ô,ÄÀÌ]Z¯§ZuY|y
]¾Ìq½Z¿Z¼¸»µZ^«{½YËY»Ê
±»ZeĬ̫{-¥Â·ÂaÂe
ÊÀÌ]ʼ¿Y½Z¼MįÊËZm
¿{Â]e[Â^v»ÊËY{ºÌe¹Z¿Â°
?AE3>3E
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮنﮐﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺪﺍﺯ ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻒ
¦Ì¸ve Á~̨Àe Y| ] ºÅ{ÄÀÌ]Z¯½Â»YÌa Ê¿Ä¿Z¼³
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻭ ﻭﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢ ﺳﺮﺣﺪﻱﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎ ،ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎ
ZÅY³ Á ZÅ^y ,ZŶ̸ve ¾ËeÃZe
5
ﺳﺮﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 88
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ
ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﺁﺩﻡﻫــﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨــﮓ ،ﻛﺎﻣﻞﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ
ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴــﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻛﻴﺎﺳــﺖ؛
»ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ« ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ
ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺧﻴﺎﺑــﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﺨﺎﻥﺯﻧﺪ،
ﺧﺮﺩﻣﻨــﺪ ﺷــﻤﺎﻟﻲ ،ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﺭﺳــﺘﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﺷــﻴﻚ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻣﺤﻞ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻞﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻃــﺮﺍﺕ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫــﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞﺑﻪﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱﺑﺮﺍﻱﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻱ
ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﮕﺮ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﭘﺮﺳﺘﻮﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﺣﺎﺝﻛﺎﻇــﻢ ،ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫــﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ،ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺎﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺳﻠﺤﺸﻮﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ -ﭘﻠﻴﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﺝﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺁژﺍﻧــﺲ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺿﺎ ﻛﻴﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ
ﺳﻠﺤﺸﻮﺭ -ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﭘﺮﺳــﺘﻮﻳﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﮕﺮ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺳﺘﻮﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻴﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻲ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ؛ ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺝ ﻣــﺮﺩﻩ ﻫــﻢ ﭘﺮﻭﻳــﺰ ﭘﺮﺳــﺘﻮﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘــﺶ ﻳــﻚ
ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺼﺪ،
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺶ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺗﻴﭗ ﭘﺮﺳــﺘﻮﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ »ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﭘﺪﺭ« ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﺵ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻩ،
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﭼﺎﻟﺸﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺗﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ
ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﺣﺎﺝﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ »ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﭘﺪﺭ« ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺣﺎﺝﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﻭ ﺳﻠﺤﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
6
ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ
ﻧﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﮔﺎﻥ .ﺳﻠﺤﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﻭﮔﺎﻥﮔﻴﺮ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﻣﺮﺑﻲ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺣﺎﺝﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﻃﻌﻨﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺘﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ .ﺍﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻴﭗ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺍﻭﺍﺳﻂ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻡﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺎﺝﻛﺎﻇــﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ،
ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯﻱ ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ
ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﮔﺎﻧﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﺒﺎﺱ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻳﻚ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﺘﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺳﻠﺤﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ.
ﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ،
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻌﺮﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺗﻔﻨــﮓ ﺍﻭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧــﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧــﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻛــﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺣﺎﻻ
ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ،ﻫﻤﺮﺯﻡ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﺶ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻃﻌﻨﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻨﻮﺩ ،ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺭﻳﺰﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺣﺘﻲ ﭘﺴﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﺝﻛﺎﻇﻢ
ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗــﺎ »ﺑﻪﻧﺎﻡ ﭘﺪﺭ«
ﺗﻜــﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ
ﻭ ﺩﻝ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﺝﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺷﻜﺎﻑﻣﻴﺎﻥﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱﺟﻨﮓﻭﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺑﺎﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱﺑﻪﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦﺷﻜﻞ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴــﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺣﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚﺩﻫﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖﻭﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖﺩﺍﺭﺩﻭﺁﻳﺎﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﻣﻴﺎﻥﺣﻀﻮﺭﭘﻴﺪﺍﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ؟ﺁﻳﺎ
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱﺗﻤﺎﻡﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
***
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﮓ،
ﺑﻠﺪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺠﻨﮕﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻧﻪﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺷــﺒﺎﻧﻪﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ .ﻧﻪ ﻓﺮﺷــﺘﮕﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ
ﻭ ﻗﺪﻳﺲ ﻭ ﻧــﻪ ﻟﻤﭙﻦ ﻭ ﺧﻼﻓﻜﺎﺭ .ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ؛ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻲ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﻠﻲﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﻣﺘﻔﻘﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻧﺎﺯﻳﺴــﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ،ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻣﺼﺎﻑ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻤﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺯﻳﺴــﻢ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻟﻴﻨﻲ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﻭﻝ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎﺳــﺖ؛ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻲ ،ﺁﺩﻡ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺧﺖ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺁﺩﻡ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺗﺶ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ
ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﺸــﻬﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻬﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻄﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ
ﺩﻫﻪ 50ﻭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﭘﻮﺳــﺖ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳــﻦ ﻛﺎﺗﺎﻟﻴﺰﻭﺭ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﺎﺕ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟
ﭼﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ »ﭼﺮﺍﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻡ؟« ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﻧﺸﻴﻦ
ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻛﻢ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﮔﺮﻩ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻛﻪ
ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ؛ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ .ﻫﺮﺟﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ
ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻨﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﺪ ،ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺧﺸﻦ
ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﻌﺖ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻮﭘﻴﺎﻱ ﺫﻫﻨﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺳــﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻛــﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﺸﺖﺷــﻤﺎﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ،
ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻫﻮﺷــﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﭘﺸﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻏﺎﻓﻞ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﻝ 59ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
، 88ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﺤﻮﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻛﻮﭼﻜﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ،ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ ،ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﮔﻮﺷﻪﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱﺟﻨﮓﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪﻫﻢﺍﺯﻋﻤﺪﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ.
ﺁژﺍﻧــﺲ ﺷﻴﺸــﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﺎﻟــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻪﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱﺷــﺎﻥ ﻭ
»ﻋﺼﺮﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ« ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻓﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺟﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸــﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻪ 80ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ
ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷــﺪﻩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگ ﺣﺎﺝ ﻛﺎﻇﻢ/ﺳﻠﺤﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺷــﻜﺎﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ 10ﺳﺎﻝ،
ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ،ﻫﻢ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﻧﻘﻲﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ -ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭ ﺣﺎﺝﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻱﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ -ﺍﺯ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﻫﻢ
ﺣﺎﺝﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ .ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻠﺤﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻃﻴﻒ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ
ﺳــﺮﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺭﺍﻭﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺮﭼﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ.
ﺷــﻜﺎﻑ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﮕﺸﺖﺷــﻤﺎﺭﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺳﺮ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻭ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺷــﺒﻴﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﺷــﺒﻴﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺠﺎ.
***
ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﺩ .ﭘﺮﺳــﺘﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻠﺤﺸــﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ
ﺷــﺒﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ،
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺣﺎﺝ ﻛﺎﻇﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ» ﺩﻭﺩ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﺗﺎﻥ
ﺍﺫﻳﺘﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺧﻴﺒﺮﻱﺳــﻮﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﺩ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺳــﺮﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻪ . 80
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﻬﺮ 1359
ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺜﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﻭ ﻛﻔــﺮ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻛﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﻭ ﻗــﺮﺁﻥ ﻛﺮﻳﻢ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﻴــﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺘﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﻨﻢ ﺑﻔﺮﺳــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺸــﻰ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺭﺗﺸــﻰ
ﻭ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﻗــﻮﺍﻯ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻴﻄﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺑــﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﻛﻮﭼــﻚ
ﻧﻬﺮﺍﺳــﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻓــﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ
ﺑﻪﭘﺎ ﺧﻴﺰﻳﺪ .ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻤﺎﺳــﺖ.
ﺑﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻫــﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﻛﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺟﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻤــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﻭ ﺳــﺘﻢ ﻣﺘﺠــﺎﻭﺯﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺗﺰﻭﻳﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﺯﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺷﻤﻨﺎﻧﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺑﻬﺖ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺷــﺮﻕ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﺴــﺘﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﭘﺮﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻜﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻭﻃﻦﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻳﻜﺎﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻤﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺭﻭﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺳﺎﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺛﺎﻣﻦﺍﻻﺋﻤﻪ)ﻉ(
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺎﺻﺮﻩ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺑﻌﺜﻰ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﺼﺮ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺸــﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺳــﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ،ﻗﻮﺍﻯ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣــﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺼﺮ ﺷﻜﺴــﺘﻪ
ﺑﺸﻮﺩ«.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﺖﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺘﺢﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﺡ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ 250ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻙ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻘــﺪﺱ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﻧﺐ ﻏﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﺁﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﻗﻠﻮﺏ
ﺳﺮﺷــﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺷــﻬﺎﺩﺕﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻰ ﻭﻟﻰﺍﷲ ﺍﻻﻋﻈﻢ ﺍﺭﻭﺍﺣﻨﺎ ﻓﺪﺍﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﻮﺡ«.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﺘﺢﺍﻟﻤﺒﻴﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻭﺳــﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻙ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻭ
ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻴﺮﺭﺱ ﺗﻮﭘﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﺑﻌﺜﻰ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪ 15ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻰ ﺍﺳﻴﺮ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ
ﻋﻈﻴﻤﻰ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺷــﺠﺎﻉ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺘﺢﺍﻟﻤﺒﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﻮﺷــﺶ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ
ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻰﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻛﻢﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﻇﺮﻑ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ،
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 15ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺘﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﺮﻭﺡ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻏﻨﺎﺋﻢ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ؟«
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598
ﺩﺭ 27ﺗﻴﺮ 1367ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻭﻯ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺣﺮﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﺎﻣﻊ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ«.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺻﺎﺩ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻘﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ،
ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻧــﺪ» :ﻧﻨﮕﺘــﺎﻥ ﺑــﺎﺩ ﺍﻯ ﺗﻔﺎﻟﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺎﺭﺗــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺩ
ﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺘﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻮﺭﺍﺥﻫﺎ
ﺧﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻠﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺮﺍﺑﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺟﺎﻫﻼﻧﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪﺍﻳﺪ«.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
»ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﻧﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ،ﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ )ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ( ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﺧﻼﺹ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻠﺤﺸــﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﻋﻈﻤﺖﺁﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ
ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ،
ﻣﻠﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻬﻨﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
7
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ
ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺑﺮﺷﻤﺮﺩﻥ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﺁﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﺁﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺮﻡ ،ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﻫﻮﺷﻴﺎﺭﻯ ،ﺑﺼﻴﺮﺕ ﻭ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﻭ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
8
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
9
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺭژﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺖ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﺮﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻲ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺭژﻩ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺭژﻩ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺖ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻗﺪ ﻣﻄﻬﺮ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ )ﺭﻩ( ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ:
»ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﻧﺎﺷــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﺱ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺟﺴﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻳﻢ ،ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻗﻮﺍﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎﺷﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭽﻜﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻨﮓ ﭘﺸﻴﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
10
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
11
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺶﺁﻣﻮﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺟﺸﻦ ﺷﻜﻮﻓﻪﻫﺎ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻛﻼﺱ ﺍﻭﻟﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢﺳﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺷﺼﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﺍﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ﮔﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻓﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺗﺮﺍﺵ
ﻭ ﭘﺎﻙﻛﻨﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺦ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺍ ﮔﻢ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﻴﺪﻧﺪ .ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
12
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
13
ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ
1ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﭽﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ
ﻧﺸــﺮﻳﻪ ﻧﻴﭽــﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﻠﺒــﻰ ﻣﺪﻋــﻰ ﺷــﺪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟــﻪ ﻋﻠﻤــﻰ
ﻛﺎﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2009ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﭙﻰﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2002ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﻩﺍﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎپ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺸــﺮﻳﻪ ﻧﻴﭽﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻭﺑﻼگﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻗﺴــﻤﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘــﻮﻥ ،ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻗــﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮ،
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ،ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﻛﺮﻩﺟﻨﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2002ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻧﻴﭽﺮ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﺍﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻰ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻚ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
Analysis of critical ricochet angle using two
space discretization methodsﻧﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺮﻳﻪ
ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ) (Engineering with Computersﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻝ 2009ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﻤﻼﺕ ﺑــﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻟﻔﻆ ﺑﻪ ﻟﻔﻆ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻟــﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ Ricochet of a tungsten heavy
alloy long-rod projectile from deformable
steel platesﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﻩ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ
2002ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﭙﻰﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺮﻳﻪ
Physics Dﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺲﺁﻧﺠﻠﺲ
ﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻼﻣﺖ ﺳــﻮﺍﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻰ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻭﺏ
ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ،ﻭﻯ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺘﻰ
ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻯ ﻣﻨﭽﺴــﺘﺮ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺕ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻟﺞ ﺳــﻠﻄﻨﺘﻰ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﺎﻡ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ،ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﻛﺒﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ
ﻣﺸــﺮﻭﺡ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻬﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺎﺳــﭙﻮﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻓﺮﺩ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ
ﺧﺒﺮ 937860ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻋﺒﺎﺳﭙﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺻﺤﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
2ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ
ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻗﻮﻩﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﺳــﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﻛﻬﺮﻳــﺰﻙ ﺩﺭ ﮔــﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟــﻰ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺧﺒــﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺳﻴﺪﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻓﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﻗﻮﻩ
ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﺩﺭﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺳــﻪ ﻧﻔﺮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ
ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺗﻰ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﻌــﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﺮﻭﻧــﺪﻩ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻬﺮﻳﺰﻙ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺍﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺮﺱ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺘﺮ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻃﻰ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ «.ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ:
»ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺎﻣﻰ
ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
14
3ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ ﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺼﺖ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﭼﻨﺪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ،ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ،ﺳــﻠﺐ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾ ﺁﻟﻮﺩ ﺣﻖ ﻭﺗﻮ ،ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻱ ﻓﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻓﻠﺴــﻄﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻫﻤﻪﭘﺮﺳﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻭ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻤﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺴــﻄﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﻻﺗﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ.
ﺣﻜﻮﻣــﺖ ﺑﺎﻛﻔﺮ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻇﻠﻢ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ)ﺹ( ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻇﻠﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺾ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻠﺴﻄﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺍﺳــﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﺁﻭﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻓﻠﺴــﻄﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺖﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ ﺳﺎﻛﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ
ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻟﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺪﺱ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﮔﻮﺍﻧﺘﺎﻣﻮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ
ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﻔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ،ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ،ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺪﻭﺭﺕﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ
ﻇﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﺎﺕ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﻏﺰﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻲﺻﺒﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ
ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻋﺎﺩﻻﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺰﻩ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺗﻼﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻲﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
4ﭘﺲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺿﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧــﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﮔــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﭘﺸــﺖ ﺩﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳــﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺳــﺎﻝ
ﻻﻳﺤــﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺧﺒــﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ
ﺩﺳــﺖﺍﻧﺪﺭﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻲﺍﻃﻼﻋﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼﺕ ﺳﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻛﺴﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺒﺮﻧــﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺑﻰﺍﻃﻼﻋﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺼﺪﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺣــﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻰﺍﻃﻼﻋﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ
ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺸﻢ
ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﻀﻤﻦ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ؟ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ،
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﻛﺎﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴــﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻭﻯ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺘﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔــﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ.
5ﺗﻌﻠﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻱ
ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻻﺧﺒــﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻌﺪ
ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ،ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻋﺠﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ» :ﺍﮔﺮ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﭘﻮﺯﻳﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺷــﺮﻭﻁ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ 73ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚﺳــﺎﻝ ﻫﻢ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ ،ﻣﻦ
ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ«.ﻧﺨﺴــﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﭘﻮﺯﻳﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺷﺮﻭﻁ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺮ
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ
ﻣﺎﻧﻊﺗﺮﺍﺷﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ«.ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻮﻳﺘﻰ ﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺒﺪ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 73
ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻃــﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪ ،ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
14ﻭ 8ﻣﺎﺭﺱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺸــﻞ
ﺳــﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻳﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻬﻠﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ
6ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻛﺮﺍﻭﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺗﻴﻚﻫﺎ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻉ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﺎﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ،
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﭘﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﺮ ﻟﺒﺎﺱﻓﺮﻭﺷــﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﺎﺯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻛــﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ،ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺍﻟﺒﺴــﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻣــﺎﺭﻙ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﺮﻭﺷــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﺮﻭﺷــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ،ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻫــﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺴــﺎﻁ
ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻼ ﺑﺮﭼﻴﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻜﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﭘﺸــﺖ ﻭﻳﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ
»ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻧﻨﺪﻩ« ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻜﻦﻫﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﻧﺼﻒﺳﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ» :ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﺎﺕ
ﻭﺍﺻﻠﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻪﻋﻤــﻞ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺣﺎﻛﻰﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊﻛﻨﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﭘﻮﺷــﺎﻙ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻟﺒﺴﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻧﻜﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﺳﻮ،
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﺻﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ
ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ،ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﻯ،
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ 17ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ،ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻙ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ
ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﺳــﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ
ﺁﻥ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ 27ﻭ 28ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺻﻨﻔﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻒ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺷــﻮﺩ«.
7ﻣﻴﺰﮔﺮﺩ ﺣﺠﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻋﻄﺮﻳﺎﻧﻔﺮ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻰ
8ﻣﺰﺩ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥﻛﻴﺎ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 58ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ 30ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ )ﺳﻪ ﺩﻫﻚ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ( ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﺪﺩ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺘﺎ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﻣﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﻣﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺪﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻧﻘﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﺮﻣﺸــﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻗﻢ
785ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻂ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ 263ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻂ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻱ ﻛﻪ 785ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻛﻞ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ 94
ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 421ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺭﻳﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ 15/9ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
9ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻫﻮ
10ﺷﺎﻳﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ ﻗﻄﺒﻲ
ﺳــﻌﻴﺪ ﺣﺠﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﻄﺮﻳﺎﻧﻔﺮ ﻭ ﺳــﻌﻴﺪ ﺷــﺮﻳﻌﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰﻧﻈﺮﻯﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙﭘﺲﺍﺯﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ.ﻋﻄﺮﻳﺎﻧﻔﺮ
ﺩﺭﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ،ﺍﻳﻦﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰﺭﺍﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰﺑﺮﺍﻯﻛﺸﻮﺭﺗﻠﻘﻰﻛﺮﺩﻭ
ﺳــﻌﻴﺪ ﺣﺠﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺳــﺨﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ
)ﻟﻜﻨﺖ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ( ﻣﺘﻦ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻋﻄﺮﻳﺎﻧﻔﺮ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻰ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺣﻴــﺪﺭﻱ ،ﻣﺠــﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻮﺿــﻮﻉ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ
ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺳﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﮔﻴــﺮﺩ ،ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻳــﻚ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺗﺠﺮﺑــﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻭ
ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻴﻚ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻫﻀﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴــﻢ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺮﺧــﺶ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ؟« ﻛﻪ ﻋﻄﺮﻳﺎﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﻭﻻ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﺳــﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺧــﺎﺹ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻭ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ 30ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ
ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻳﻢ؟ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑــﻞ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺣﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺣﺠﺎﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺳــﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ 30ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻣﻨﺒﻌــﺚ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺮﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ،
ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺷــﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻭﻗــﻮﻑ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻣﺎ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ«.
ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ
ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻫﻮ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺰﺏ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ» .ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻫﺮﺗﺰﻭگ« ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻓﻰ
ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ:
»ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻫــﻮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ،ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻟﻰ،
ﻧﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻫﻮ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰ ﻟﻴﻜﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ
ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﺮﺗﺰﻭگ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺣﺰﺏ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻫﻮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻯ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﻫﺪ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺣﺘﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻳﻢ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﻳﻮﻳﻴﻞ ﺣﺴﻮﻥ« ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﻨﻴﺴﺖ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻫﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗﻰ
ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ.
»ﺑﺎ ﺫﺭﻩﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺐ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺪﺍﺭﻛﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻴﻢﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ«.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ
ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻛﻔﺎﺷــﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴــﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻴﻮﻥ
ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻯ ﺳﺮﻣﺮﺑﻰ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺴﺎﻻﻥ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﻡ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺩﺍﺷﺖ» :ﺑﺎ ﺫﺭﻩﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻧــﺐ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳــﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺗﺪﺍﺭﻛﺎﺗــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻴﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻠــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ
ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺗــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ«.
ﻭﻯ ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻯ ﻗﻄﺒــﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺘﻴﺠــﻪ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﻳــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠــﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺗــﻰ ﺟــﺎﻡ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺗﻰ
ﺟﺎﻡ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ
ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻨﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﻯ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ«.
ﻛﻔﺎﺷﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺳــﻨﮕﺎﭘﻮﺭ ،ﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻳﻠﻨﺪ ﺣﺮﻳﻔﺎﻧﻰ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﺟﺎﻡﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﺳــﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻡ
ﻣﻠﺖﻫــﺎ ﺁﻣــﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣــﻰ ﺻﻌﻮﺩ ﺑــﻪ ﺟﺎﻡﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﻢ
ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
15
ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎ
ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦ
ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻋﺘــﺮﺍﺽ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺭﺍﺣﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ،ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻦ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ ،ﻧﻮﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻭ ﭘﺴﺮ ﻳﺎﺩﮔﺎﺭ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ)ﺭﻩ( ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻦ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻧﺸــﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﺒﺮﺳــﺎﺯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ
ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻓــﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻟــﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤــﺎﺯ ﻋﻴﺪﻓﻄﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﺖ ﻣﻘــﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤــﺎﺯ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺧﺒﺮﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺣﺴــﻦ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦ
ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳــﻢ ﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺩﻭ ﺗﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ،ﻭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ
ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮﺍﻧﺶ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﻮﺭ ﺷﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱﺧﻮﺋﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺋﻴﻨﻲﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺮﺩ ﺧﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺮﻱ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳــﻢ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ:
»ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻤﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ «.ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻴﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ
ﭘﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻲ ﺟﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ «.ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ» :ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﻫﺪﻑ ،ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻼﻣﺖ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻳﺎﺩﮔﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ،ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ)ﺭﻩ(
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ
ﺳﻴﺪﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺁﻗﺎ ﮔﻔﺖ ،ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺷﻤﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ
ﺳﻴﺪ ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻰ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧــﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺩﺭﻭﻍﮔﻮﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻤــﺖ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺣﺎﺋﺮﻯﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺑﺪﻥ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺗﺸﺒﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻘﺎ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺗﺰﻭﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻣﻲﻧﺎﻣﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﺮﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻌﺮ ﻓﺮﺩﻭﺳﻰ » ﺑﻨﻰ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮﻧﺪ« ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ «.ﻭﻯ ﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻭﻍﮔﻮﻳﻰ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﻭ
ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺣﻴﺪﺭﻯ ،ﻣﺠﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﻤﻰﺁﻳﻨﺪ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧــﺪ ،ﺭﻭﻍ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭﻭﻇﺎﻳــﻒ ﺭﺭﺍ ﺭ
ﻡ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﺯﻡ
ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣــﺪﻯ ﻭ ﻮ ﻰ
ﻭ ﺭ
ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ
ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻨﺪ «.ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺳــﻜﻮﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺪﻳ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴــﺪ ﻛــﺮﺩ» :ﺑﻪﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺗﻰ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻢ
ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻢ؟ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ
ﻋﺬﺭﺧﻮﺍﻫــﻰ ،ﺍﺭﻓﺎﻕ ﻭ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧــﺪ .ﺑﺎﻋﺬﺭ
ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﺸﻜ
ﻣﺤﻤــﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ،ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﺳﻮﺭﻭﺱ ،ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭ
ﻣﻮﺳﺴــﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ،ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺁﻗــﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺷــﺖ:
»ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﻧﻪ ﺳﻮﺭﻭﺱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺱ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻯ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ،ﺍﻳﻤﻰ ﻭﻳﻞ ،ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﺴــﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ
ﺑﻰﺑﻰﺳــﻰ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳــﻮﺭﻭﺱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺗﻤﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ -ﺍﻳﺮﻧﺎ -ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﺳﻮﺭﻭﺱ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ» :ﺑﺎ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ«.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﻭ
ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ«
ﺑﻰ ﺱ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻰ
ﺑﺎﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﺒﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺎﺕ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ﺩﺭﻭﻍﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ »ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺪﻩ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺒﺮﻯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ »ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻰﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻘﻼﺏ
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ« ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺳﻒ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻥ«
ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺪ» :ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﺳﻮﺭﻭﺱ
ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻴﺘﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻯ
ﺕ
ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺻﺤﺖ ﺳﺖ«.
16
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﺩﺭ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰﻧﺸــﺪﻥ ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﻫــﻢ ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺩﻛﺘــﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﺒﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﻮﺡ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﻛﻪ »ﺍﺯ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﺯﻻﻝ ،ﺩﻟﺴــﻮﺯ ،ﭘﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ
ﭘﺮﺟﻨﺐ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺵ ﻭ ﺟــﺰﻭ ﭘﺎﻛﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘﺶ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ «.ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ .ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻰ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﻳﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﺎﻻ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﻯ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ؛ ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ 220ﺗﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺑﻘﺎﻯ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺴــﺖ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﺶ،
ﻛﺎﺭﺳﺎﺯ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﭘﺴﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺵ ـ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ـ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 58ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺁﺫﺭﺑﺎﻳﺠﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ،ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﻰ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﻟﺸﻜﺮ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺳﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﺩﺭ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺗﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻯ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺧﺎﺗﻢﺍﻻﻧﺒﻴﺎ)ﺹ( ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ،
ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻓﻨﻰ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺪ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﻭ ﮔﺘﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﻴﺪ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﻗﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﻏﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1340ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﻣﻴﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1368ﺩﺭ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻰ
ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺷﺮﻳﻒ ،ﻓﺎﺭﻍﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1382ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ
ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ )ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢﻫﺎ( ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ)ﻉ( ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﻛﺒﻴﺮ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻓﺘﺎﺡ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﺭﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ)ﻉ( ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ.
ﻏﺎﻳﺐ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺩﻫﻪ
ﺻﻨﺪﻟــﻰ ﺧﺎﻟﻰ ﺁﻳــﺖﺍﷲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳــﺰﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺴــﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒــﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ،ﻟﻨﺰ
ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻜﺎﺳــﺎﻥﻭﺫﻫﻦ ﺑﻴﻨﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﻭ ﻧﺎﻳــﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺍﻳﻦﻣﺠﻠﺲﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ
ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻏﻴﺒﺖ ﻧﺎﻳــﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒــﺮﮔﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﻀــﻮﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻛﻮﺷــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻏﻴﺒﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻴﺮﮔﻰ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻨﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻄﻖ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ! ﺑﺤﺚ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺮﺳﻰ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ
ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﻗﻴــﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻴــﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺴــﺮ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 50ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻬﻤﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﻫﻢ،
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﺑﻮﺩ.ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﺍﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻯﺗﺸــﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﺏﺩﺭﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ،ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻭ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ
ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ» :ﻣﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﺗﺶ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﻓﻬﻤﻴﻢ.
ﻣﮕﺮﺧﺪﺍﻯﻧﺎﻛﺮﺩﻩﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪﻓﺘﻨﻪﺍﻯﺑﺮﭘﺎﻛﻨﻨﺪ.ﻓﺘﻨﻪﺑﺮﭘﺎﻛﺮﺩﻥﻏﻴﺮﺍﺯﺍﻳﻦﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻎ ﻓﺘﻨﻪ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ «.ﻳــﺰﺩﻯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻫﻢ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰﻣﺪﺕ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ .ﺧﻄﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻳﺰﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺷــﺪ .ﻋﻀﻮ 78ﺳﺎﻟﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺴﻚ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﮔﺸ
ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻋﻴﺖ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﮕﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ
ﺷﻮﻮﺭ ﻯ
ﺍﻯ
ﮔﺸﻮﺩ .ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﻭ
ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰﺟﺎﻯﻧﮕ
ﭼﭗ
ﻳﺰﺩﻯﺩﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺖﭼﭗ
ﺰﺩﻯ
ﻯ
ﻳﻳﺰﺰﺩ
ﺰﺩ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰﺷﺎﻫﺮﻭﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻧﺎﻳﺐﺭﺋﻴﺲﺩﻳﮕﺮﻣﺠﻠﺲﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥﺩﺭ
ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﮔﻬﮕﺎﻩ
ﺳﺳﻤﺖ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻧﺸﺴ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ.ﺳﺮﺍﻧ
ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ،
ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥﻛﺸﻒﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲﻳﺰﺩﻯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ،
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ
ﺷﺷﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻧﻴﻜﻼ ﺳﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯﻱ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ،ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﺷﻜﺎﻳﺖ
ﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻭﻣﻴﻨﻚ ﺩﻭﻭﻳﻠﭙﻦ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ .ﺳﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯﻱ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻢﺣﺰﺑﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ
ﺭﺷﻮﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻭﻭﻳﻠﭙﻦ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ژﺍﻙ ﺷﻴﺮﺍﻙ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﭼﭗ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯﻱ
ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺷﻴﺮﺍﻙ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ،2004ﺷﺎﻳﻌﻪﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﺒﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻗﺎﻳﻖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻳﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺒﻠﻐﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺷﻮﻩ
ﻭﺍﺭﻳﺰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺳــﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﻪ )ﺳﺎﻝ (2003ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺸﺎﮔﺮﻱ ﺳﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻭﻣﻴﻨﻚ ﺩﻭﻭﻳﻠﭙﻦ ﺷﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺷــﺪ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﻭﻥﺣﺰﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﻱ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ
ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺕ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺳﻪﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺴﻪ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺩﻭﻭﻳﻠﭙﻦ ﻧﻄﻖ ﺗﻨﺪﻱ
ﻪ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻄﻖ
ﺖ:
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻣﻦ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ
ﺘﻢ.
ﻫﺴﺘﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺳﺮﺳﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻟﺠﻮﺟﺎﻧﻪ
ﻚ
ﻳــﻚ ﻧﻔــﺮ ﺑﻪﻧــﺎﻡ ﻧﻴــﻜﻼ ﺳــﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯﻱ ﻛــﻪ
ﺲ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ.
ﻣــﻦ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺮﺋﺋﻪ
ﻦ
ﺗﺒﺮﺋﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ
«.
ﺷﺪ«.
17
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ
ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺸﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﺠﻴﺖ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺳﺮﻣﺸﻖ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻰ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ .ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻔﺤﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺪﺳﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺴﻮﻳﻪﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕــﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻫــﻢ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻦ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﻭﻱ ﮔﻴﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻓﺮﻭﺷﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻴﺘﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧــﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﻋﻴﺪﻓﻄﺮ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﻠﺘﻬﺐ ﻓﺮﺍ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﺖ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻓﻀــﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺘﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺷــﺨﺎﺹ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺠﻴﺖ ﺷــﺮﻋﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﺴﻨﻪ
ﻭ ﻣﻬﺮﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺗﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ »ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ،ﺳﻮءﻇﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺪﮔﻤﺎﻧﻰ« ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻧﺪ» :ﺭﻭﻳﻪ
ﺗﺎﺳــﻒﺑﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺝ ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﺩﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻇﻠﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ«.
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻧﻰ ،ﺷــﺮﻋﺎ ،ﻋﺮﻓﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻼ
ﺣﺠﺖ ،ﻣﺴﻤﻮﻉ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻓﺬ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺣﺠﻴﺖ ﺷــﺮﻋﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻤﻮﻉ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮءﻇﻦ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻘﻴﺐ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ
ﻭ ﻣﺠــﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻣﺠﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻜﻠﻒ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻧﺪ» :ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ،ﻗﺎﻃﻌﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻣﺠﺮﻡ ﻏﻴﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻬﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ«.
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﺩﻟﻰ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ
20
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻐﺮﺽ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ،ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺯﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷــﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻛﺪﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻰ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ،ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻰ ﺷــﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ«.
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤــﺚ ﺭﻭﺍﺝ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﻭ
ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ،ﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺷــﺨﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﻛﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺴــﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻬﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﻓﺮﺩﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺗﻴﺘﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ﻛﻴﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ:
»ﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺷــﺨﺎﺹ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ«
ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﺳــﻮﺭﻭﺱ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺒــﻊ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﻳﺤﻴــﻲ ﻛﻴﺎﻥﺗﺎﺟﺒﺨﺶ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭘﺎﻱ
ﻓﺸﺮﺩ.
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻓــﺎﺭﺱ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻢﺍﻟﻬﺪﻱ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺸــﻬﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻄﻖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﺗﺶ ﻓﺘﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﮔﻔﺖ:
»ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﻳﻨــﻲ ﻭ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ«.
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺗﻘﻲ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ
ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ» :ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻲ ،ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮔــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺯﺩ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ«.
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻱ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ)ﻉ( ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ
ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ،ﻣﺠﺪﺩﺍ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ،ﺗﻔﺮﻗﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣــﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻱ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺝﺳﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺍﻳــﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎ ،ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ﻭ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺗﻔﺮﻗﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ،
ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻲ ،ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺭﺳﻮﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﺯ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ،
ﻣﺸــﺨﺼﺎ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﻣﻤﺎﺷﺎﺕ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺑــﺎ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
ﻭﺣﺪﺕﺷﻜﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴــﻴﻮﻥ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ﺳﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﮔﻔﺖ:
»ﭘﻨﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺣﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ
ﺭﻫﺒــﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧــﻲ ﻛﻔﺮ ﻭﺭﺯﻳﻢ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪﺮﻧﻤﻲﮔــﺮﺩﺩ«.
ﺑ
ﺑــﻪ
ﺍﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸــﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭﻩ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸﺎﺕ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﻮﺍﺿــﻊ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﻮ ﺳــﻮﻕ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻨﺪﺳــﻜﻮﺕﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺎ ،ﺣﺮﻛــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﺎﺭ ﺷﺪ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺗﺮﻗﻲ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺗﻔﻬﻴﻢ ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﺯﻳﺮﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﻢﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺯﻳﺮﺳﻮﺍﻝﺑﺮﺩﻥﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖﻭﺁﺑﺮﻭﻱﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹﻧﻴﺴﺖﻭﺑﺎﻳﺪﻫﻤﻪﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺪﺍﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊﺑﻪﺟﺎﻱﺩﻓﺎﻉﺍﺯﻧﻈﺎﻡ،ﺩﻓﺎﻉﺍﺯﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﭘﻴﺪﺍﻛﻨﺪﻳﺎﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉﺍﺯﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹﻧﻈﺎﻡﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺭﺍﺯﻳﺮﺳﻮﺍﻝﺑﺒﺮﻳﻢ،ﺍﻳﻦﻧﻜﺘﻪ
ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱﺩﺭﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱﺑﻮﺩ.ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﺩﻳﮕﺮﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁﻣﻲﺷﺪﺑﻪ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻣﺴﻤﻮﻣﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺟﺮﻣﺸﺎﻥ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻣﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺳﻠﺐ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺩﺭﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩﻛﻪﺑﻌﺪﺍﺍﮔﺮﺑﻌﻀﻲﺍﺯﺍﻳﻦﺷﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕﻭﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ
ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕﻧﺸﺪﻭﺭﺩﺷﺪﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎﺩﻳﮕﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻱﻭﺷﻔﺎﻑﺳﺎﺯﻱﺩﺭﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻭﻻﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥﺩﺭﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﺩﺭﺩﺭﺟﻪﺍﻭﻝﺁﻧﭽﻪﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺗﻲﻣﻮﺭﺩﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﻫﺪ.ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺯﺟﻮﻳﻲﺍﺯﺧﻮﺩﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ،ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻳﺪ؛ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻛﻴﻔﺮﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻃﺮﺡﺷﻮﺩﻛﻪﻫﻢﺍﺩﻋﺎﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻭﻫﻢﻣﺘﻬﻢﺁﻥﺭﺍﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪﻛﺮﺩﻩﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﻟﺬﺍﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪﺍﻳﻦﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱﺍﺯﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﻣﺴﻤﻮﻣﻲﻛﻪﺩﺭﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﭘﺪﻳﺪﺁﻣﺪﻩﻭﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻫﻢﻫﺮﺭﻭﺯﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻮ ﺳﻮءﻇﻦ ﻭ
ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺴــﻂ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺗﻘﺒﻴﺢ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪﺩﺭﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﺻﻼﺡﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎﻣﻘﺼﺮﺩﺭﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱﺍﺯﻓﺮﻭﻛﺶﻛﺮﺩﻥﺍﻳﻦﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ
ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪﻛﻪﻣﺎﻧﻊﺁﺭﺍﻡﺷﺪﻥﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪﻭﺍﺯﻣﻮﺍﺿﻌﺸﺎﻥﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ
ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺟﻤﻌﻪﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﭼﻨﺪﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪﺍﺯﻃﺮﻑﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱﻭﻛﺮﻭﺑﻲﺻﺎﺩﺭﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﻭﻗﺘﻲﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪﻫﺎﻭﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﺩﻗﺖﺑﻜﻨﻴﺪﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎﻧﺸﺎﻥﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎﺑﻪﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻛﻤﻚﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪﺑﻠﻜﻪﺳﻌﻲﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻴﺰﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺑﻴﻔﺰﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲﺍﺯﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕﺑﺎﻃﺮﺡﺑﻌﻀﻲﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﻭﺍﻓﺸﺎﮔﺮﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲﻛﻪﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪﻭ
ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎﻫﻢﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩﺑﻪﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺩﻭﻟﺖﺑﺎﺯﻫﻤﻴﻦﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﺭﺍﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻲﻭﻭﺍﻛﻨﺸﻲﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﻭﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪﺍﻳﻦﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺑﻪﺳﻤﺖﺣﻞﻭﻓﺼﻞﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ.ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺑﻴﻦﺑﻌﻀﻲﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻴﮕﺮﻱﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺗﻨﺶﻫﺎ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺧﻮﺑﻲﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪﺿﻤﻦﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱﺩﺭﺧﺼﻮﺹﺍﻳﻦﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞﻭ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﺣﺴﺎﺏﺷﺪﻩﻭﺩﻗﻴﻘﻲﺍﺳﺖﻭﺩﺭﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺍﻟﻤﻮﻣﻨﻴﻦ)ﻉ(
ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺨﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻗــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﭘﻴﺶﺑﺮﺩﻥﻣﺴﻴﺮﺑﻪﺳﻤﺖﻣﻬﺎﺭﻭﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ،ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ،ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏﻭﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺩﻣﺪﺍﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؛ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻓﺼﻞﺍﻟﺨﻄﺎﺏ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺜﻼ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﻛﻪﺩﺭﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱﻗﺒﻠﻲﺷﺎﻥﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻛﻪﺩﺭﺭﺍﺱﺍﻳﻦﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻳﻚﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻻﺯﻡﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺣﻞ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﺸﺎﻥ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﺎﻣﻞﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺫﻫﻦ
ﻭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻭ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ .ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪﺍﻳﻦﻓﻀﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲﻛﺸﻮﺭﻭﻛﺎﻫﺶﺣﻮﺯﻩﻧﻔﻮﺫﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺩﺭﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ
ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺩﺭﺻﺤﻨﻪﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲﺷﻮﺩﻛﻪﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻳﻚﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱﺍﺳﻼﻡﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲﻭ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﺩﻳﻨﻲﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝﻧﮕﺮﻳﺴﺘﻦﺑﻪﻧﻈﺎﻡﻣﺎﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪﻭﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﺯﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺩﺭﺻﺤﻨﻪﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲﻛﻪﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﺑﺎﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝﺩﻓﺎﻉﺍﺯﺍﺳﻼﻡﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﻭﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﻳﻜﻲ
ﺷﺪﻥﺩﻳﻦﻭﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺩﺭﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪﺩﭼﺎﺭﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪﻭﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻋﻴﺎﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲﻭﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﺭﺍﺣﺲﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻟﺬﺍﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪﻫﻢﺁﺛﺎﺭﻭﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲﺍﺵﻣﻨﻔﻲﺍﺳﺖﻭﻫﻢﺁﺛﺎﺭ
ﻭﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲﺁﻥﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻭﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﺁﻭﺭﻭﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪﺯﺣﻤﺎﺕﺳﻪ
ﺩﻫﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻋﺰﺕ ﻭ ﻋﻈﻤﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺧﺪﺷﻪ
ﻛﻨﺪ.ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ،ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻓﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮﺷﻮﺩﻭﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﺑﺎﻳﺪﺍﺯﻳﻚﭘﺨﺘﮕﻲﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻗﻨﺎﻉ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﺳﻮءﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﺪﻫﺪ.ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻗﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻢﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲﺩﺭﺩﺭﺟﻪﺍﻭﻝﺟﺰﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻓﻘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻢ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﻭ
ﻗﺎﺿﻲﺍﻗﻨﺎﻉﺷﺪﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎﺍﮔﺮﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻛﻢﻭﻛﺎﺳﺘﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪﻧﻴﺎﺯ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺒﺮﺋﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱﺟﺒﺮﺍﻧﺶﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡﻛﻨﺪ.
21
ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺁﺑﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ؟
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺣﻖﭘﺮﺳﺖ
ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﺍﻣﺴــﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﺏ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢ ﻧﺴــﺒﻲ
ﺩﺳــﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻴﺪﻓﻄﺮ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﺪﺱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻼﻝ ،ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ
ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ،ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖﺷﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻫﻤﺴﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﺏ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﺩ.
»ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺠﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻯﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈــﻢ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮءﻇﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺪﮔﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺗﺎﺳﻒﺑﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺝ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ﻭ
ﺗﻬﻤﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻇﻠﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺣﺴﻨﻪ
ﻭ ﻣﻬﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺗﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ »ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮءﻇﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺪﮔﻤﺎﻧﻲ« ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻧﺪ» :ﺭﻭﻳﻪ
ﺗﺎﺳــﻒﺑﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺝ ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﺩﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻇﻠﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ«.
ﺭﻫﺒــﺮﻱ ﺑــﻪ ﭘﺨــﺶ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺧــﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻭ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺘﻬــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻧﻲ» ،ﺷــﺮﻋﺎ ،ﻋﺮﻓﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻼ«
ﺣﺠﺖ ،ﻣﺴﻤﻮﻉ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻓﺬ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺣﺠﻴﺖ ﺷــﺮﻋﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻤﻮﻉ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮءﻇﻦ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻘﻴﺐ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ
ﻭ ﻣﺠــﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻣﺠﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻜﻠﻒ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻧﺪ» :ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ،ﻗﺎﻃﻌﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻣﺠﺮﻡ ﻏﻴﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻬﻤﺖﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﺩﻫﻴــﻢ «.ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﺩﻟﻲ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻐﺮﺽ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ،ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺯﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷــﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﻛﺪﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﺳﺖ«.
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻗﻮﻩﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮ،
ﺗﻴﺘﺮﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺗﺎ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ
ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
22
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻗﺎﺿﻰﺍﻟﻘﻀﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ
ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖﺷــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺘﻰ ﺳﻮﻕ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻏﻴﺮﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻗﻮﻩﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﺯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺧﺘﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﻏﺮﻭﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﻪ ﻗﻢ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻗﻮﻩﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺨﻦ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻨﺪﻳﺸﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺑﺮﻭﻱ ﺭﻳﺨﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﻣﺤﺴــﻦ ﻏﺮﻭﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑــﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻏﺎﻳﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴــﺮ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺨﻦ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺠﻴﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ ﻫــﻢ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻗﻮﻩ
ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﻋﺎﺩﻩ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﻣﺮﻳــﻢ ﺑﻬــﺮﻭﺯﻱ ،ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴــﻞ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻴــﺮ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺣﺠﺖ
ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ» :ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ،ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺣﺠﺖ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺼﻪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸﺎﺕ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ،
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻜﻤﻲ ﺷــﺮﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻣﺎﺳﺖ«.ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ)ﺱ( ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﺍﺕ ،ﺑﺎﺏ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ،ﺩﺭﻭﻍﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻫﺎﻧﺖﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﮔﻮﻳﻰ ﺯﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻫﺮ ﺣﺮﻓﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﻻﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ«.ﻭﻯ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺑﺎﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻮﻟﺸــﻮﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺜﻴﻒ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺳﻮءﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺳﻮژﻩ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻌــﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺗﺎﻛﻴــﺪ ﻛــﺮﺩ» :ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻗﺴﻤﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺝ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ «.ﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ﻣﻮﺛﺮﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﻫﺴــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﺪﻣﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ،
ﺟﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺘﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺷــﻮﺩ،
ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺯﻳﻨﺐ)ﺱ( ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻘﺎﺿــﺎﻯ ﺍﻋﺎﺩﻩ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ» :ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻨﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻬﻤﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺒﺮﺍ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﻋﺎﺩﻩ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﺑﻬــﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻟﻄﻤﻪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﺗﻬﻤﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸﺎﺕ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺎﺩﻩ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺷﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﻋﺰﺕﺍﷲ ﺿﺮﻏﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﻫﺎﺷﻢ ﻫﺎﺷﻢﺯﺍﺩﻩﻫﺮﻳﺴﻰ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺖ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﺧﻼﻑ ﺷﺮﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺣﺠﻴﺖ ﺷﺮﻋﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻤﻮﻉ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ،
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺖ ﺣﻜﻢ ،ﺧﻼﻑ ﺷــﺮﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻫﻴــﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ،
ﻧﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨــﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺷــﻨﻮﻡ ﭼﺮﺍﻛــﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ
ﺧﻼﻑ ﺷﺮﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒــﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒــﺮﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ
ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳــﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓــﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻬﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛــﺮﺩ» :ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺍﻇﻬــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻬﻤــﺎﻥ ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻄﻌﻰ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺣﻜــﻢ ،ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺎﻩ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ«.ﻭﻯ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﭘﺨﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ
ﺭﻣﻀــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﮔﻨﺎﻩ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺧﻮﺏ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ«.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ
ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﻴﻮﺥ
ﺧﺒــﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒــﺮﻱ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻤــﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ
ﺟﻼﻝﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻓﺎﺭﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺛﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑــﻮﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺖ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻬﺸﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺪﺭﺯ ﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻴﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺁﻳﺖ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻬﺸﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻲ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﻑ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺩﻫﻪ 50ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺳﺮﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﺟﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫــﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ
ﺭﺍﻫﮕﺸﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺭﻳﺶ ﺳﻔﻴﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻲ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻧﻮﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﺭﻭﺯﻫــﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺑــﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﭘﺸﺖ ﺳﺮﻧﻤﻲ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻝ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺩﻫﻪ 50ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻴــﺮﺍﺙﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﻭﺯﻫــﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳــﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭﻟــﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﭘﻴﺶﺭﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺳﺨﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﺩﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﻴﻨﺪﻳﺸﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﻣﻲﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﻙ
ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﻴﻮﺥ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻲ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻲ
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ
ﻭ ﻧﻮﺭﺳﺘﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﺩﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻘﺶﺁﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
23
ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ ﺧﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻩ ﺷﻔﻴﻌﻲ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ،ﺷﺸــﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﻭ
ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﭼﺸــﻢﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻲ
ﻗﺮﻣﺰﺭﻧﮓ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻣﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﻮﺩ :ﭼﺮﺍ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻳﺰﺩﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻣﺪﺭﺳﻴﻦ
ﺑﺎ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻣﻮﺳﺲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻲ
ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻮﺳﺲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷــﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺧﻮﺵﺑﺎﻭﺭﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ
ﻳﺰﺩﻱ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻛﻤﻲ
ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﻈــﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲﻳﺰﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺩ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻓﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻧﺰﺩ.
ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ،
ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸــﺎﺕ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻫﮕﺸﺎﻱ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ
ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻀﺎﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪ
ﺑﻔﻬﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺣﺎﻣﻲ
ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻃــﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﺕ ،ﺣﻴﻦ
ﻭ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺁﻣــﺎﺝ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻤﺖﻫﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻐﺘﻨﻢ ﺷــﻤﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸــﺎﺕ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﺍﺷــﺨﺎﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ،ﺑﻪﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﻮﺽ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺗﻴﺮ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺣﻴــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺗــﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻨــﻮﺯ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻏﻴﺒﺖ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻳﺰﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻃﻴﻒ ﺟﻨﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﻳﺪﺍﻥ ﻳﺰﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺳﺨﻨﻲ
ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﻋﺪﻡ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻳﺰﺩﻱ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻳﺰﺩﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﺯﺟﻤﻌﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ،ﺍﺻﺤﺎﺏ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻢ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻭ ﭘﺮﺳــﻴﺪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺻﺤﺒــﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﺠﻤﻪ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ
ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺠﻤﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﺰﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻏﻴﺒﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻳﺰﺩﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻭﺩﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻏﻴﺒﺘﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺣﺠﺖ ﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺘﺨﻠﻔﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﺎﺷـﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺸـﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻧﭙﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ
ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻃﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﭘﻴﺸﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻫﺎﺷـﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺳـﺨﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺍﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑـﺮﻭﻥ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺪﺑﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣـﺎ ﻫﺎﺷـﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴـﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑـﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺸـﺎ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺨﺖ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯﺁﻧﻜـﻪ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺳـﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒـﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺷـﺎﺧﺺ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻫﺎﺷـﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴـﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺠﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳـﺖ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓـﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺳـﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﭼﻬـﺮﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ
ﺑـﻪ ﻫﺎﺷـﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫـﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ
24
ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺷﺎﻫﺮﻭﺩﻱ ﺗﺎ
ﺁﻳﺖ ﺍﷲ ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺡ ﻳﺰﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳﻼﻡ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤﻲ،
ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻣﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ.
***
ﺍﺯﻣﺘﻨﻲﻛﻪﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲﺍﺯﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦﺁﻥﺍﺯﺳﻮﻱ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥﻭﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯﺍﻥﻧﻈﺎﻡﺧﺒﺮﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ،ﺍﻃﻼﻋﻲﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ
ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻟﺰﻭﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺟﻨﺒـﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳـﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳـﻚ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺫﻳﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺿﻤﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍ
ﻭ ﺣﺪﺍﻗـﻞ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘـﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ،ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻴـﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺷﺪ؟
ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻋﻠــﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖﺷــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍﻱ
ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍ
ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻟﻮﺣﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺰﺍﻱ
ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻟﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷﺎﺕ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﺁﺭﺍﻣﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷﺎﺕ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ؟
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻟﻄﻒ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﻟﻄﻒ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ،ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺗﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻟﻄﻒ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺭﺍﻫﭙﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ؟ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺎﺳــﻒ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﺪﺱ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻡ ﻓﻠﺴﻄﻴﻦ
ﻭ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻟﮕﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺿﻤﺎﻧﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺁﻳــﺖﺍﷲ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺸﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻘﻼﻱ ﻗﻮﻡ
ﻭ ﺩﻟﺴﻮﺯﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺩ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﻥﺭﻓﺖ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻭﺿﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻨﻈﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻧﺎﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻣﻬــﺪﻭﻱ ﻛﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑــﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋــﻼﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ،
ﺑﺮﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﻫﻤﺪﻟﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺻﺤﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺣﺠﺖﺍﻻﺳــﻼﻡ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻤــﻲ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸــﺘﻢ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺷــﺪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻣﻬﺪﻭﻱﻛﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺷــﻜﺎﻑ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺸﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺗﺎﺳــﻒﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫــﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻗﺒﻠﻲﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﺒﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺗﺠﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﭘﺸﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺟﺮﺍﺋﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﺎﻙ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺕ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻛﺸﺘﻪﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﮕﻨﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻝ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ...ﺷﺪ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜـﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻗﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣـﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺿﻲ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴـﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻃﻮﻝ 30ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻜﺎﻓﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﻢ .ﻫﻴﭽﮕﺎﻩ ﺷــﻜﺎﻓﻲ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ 30ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳــﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﺎﻳــﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﺖ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺷــﺄﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﮕﻪﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
25
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
»ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﻋﻴﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ«.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪﺷـﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﺠﺎﻟﺲ
ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻰ
ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ» :ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﭘﻮﺵ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻮﺍﻗﺺ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ «.ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴـﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘـﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺯﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ
ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺫﻳﻞ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺍﺳﺖ:
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﮔﻪ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ .ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﻧﻘﺪﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ
ﻭ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﻴﺪ ﺑــﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼــﻮﺏ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺣﺎﻛــﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺎﺧﺼﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﭘﺮﭼﻢ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺻﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ
ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏﺗﺮ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻯﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫـﺎﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﭼﻴﺴـﺖ؟ﺁﻳﺎ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳـﺖ ﺩﺳـﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ
ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﺳﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﻭ ﻛﮋﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺳﻨﺠﻰ ﺑﻴﻬﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﺧﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ
ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﻗﻠﻤــﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﻧﻤﻰﺗﺎﺑﻨﺪ.
ﺩﻳـﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳـﺖ ﺑﻰ ﭼـﻮﻥ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﻯ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻰﭼﻮﻥ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻠﻂ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﺪ .ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺗﻜﺐ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ
ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿــﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻣﺪﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﭼــﺎﺭ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ
ﺍﮔــﺮ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻘــﺎﻱ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﺨﻄــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
26
ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺮﺯﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘـﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻘﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺣﻔﻆ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ
ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﮕــﺮﺵ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑــﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫــﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻫــﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ
ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﭘـﺲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳـﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘـﺪ ﻗﺎﺋـﻞ ﺑـﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳـﺎﺕ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻃﻠﺐ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻫﺮ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻔﻆ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ
ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻣﺼﻠﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺗﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺟﻨــﺎﺡ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰﮔﺮﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﺮﺧــﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧــﻮﻉ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃــﻰ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑــﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭﻳﻰﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ
ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺸﻢ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥﻭﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥﺑﺮﭼﻪﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰﻧﻘﺪﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ؟
ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ
ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻮﻳﻖ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺗﻀﺎﺭﺏ ﺁﺭﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﺠﺮ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺗﻪﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺷــﺨﺼﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﻰ
ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺑــﻪ ﻏﺮﺏﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﺷــﻜﻨﻰ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑــﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻌﺘﺪﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻗﻮﻩﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺗﻰ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺭﻫﺒـﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻧﻴـﺰ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘـﺪ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺗﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃــﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻭ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋــﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﺟﺮﺍﺕ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻥ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺸﻰ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻗﻮﻩﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻯ
ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻈﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻭﻯ ﻟﺠﺒﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﺴﻦﻧﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺖ ﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺑﻰﭘﺎﻳﻪ
ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ
ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻧﻘﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻳـﻦ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﻳﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؟
ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻨﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺻﻮﺍﺏ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﻣﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺮﺩ
ﻳﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺤﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻤﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﻓﺴــﺎﺩ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺷــﺨﺎﺻﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻻﻳﺤﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻰ ﺑﻨﺎﻣﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻘﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ
ﻳﺎ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﭼﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻳﺪ ﺗـﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ؟
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻨﺪ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿــﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺘــﺰﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ،ﻭﻻﻳﺖﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﺑــﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼــﻮﺏ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻨــﺪﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺳــﺎﻟﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺸﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒـﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫـﺎﻯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ ،ﺑﺮﺧــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺷﺎﻳﺴــﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ
ﻋﺎﺟﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺯﻳﺮﭘﺎﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ
ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﺤﺠﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻯ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ.
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟
ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻗــﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺸــﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻴﺸــﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴــﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬــﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻰ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ ﭘﺮﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺯﺣﻤﺖﻛﺸﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻫــﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺧــﻼﻑ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴــﻢ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻼ،
ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖﻭﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻧﻰﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ؟ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺖ ﺷــﻮﻡ ﻭ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻭﺭﺍﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻗــﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﺮﺍﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑــﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ
ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻮﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ
ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺳــﺘﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﮋﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﻫﻢ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻴﻮﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﺘﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻓــﺮﺩﻯ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﻗﺎﻃﺒﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
27
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻣﺤﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪ
ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ
»ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧـﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﻫﺒـﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻉ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻳـﺮﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷـﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿـﻊ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻣﺤﺒﻴﺎﻥ ،ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺴـﻴﻦ
ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﺧﻮﺩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻰﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.ﻣﺤﺒﻴﺎﻥﻛﻪﺑﺮﻟﺰﻭﻡﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺯﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻭﻧﻘﺪﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﺗﺎﻛﻴـﺪﺩﺍﺭﺩ،ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ»:ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺯﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺿﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ
ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺕﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ«.ﺍﻳﻦﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺴﻴﻦﺟﻨﺎﺡﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻫـﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ .ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ ﺫﻳﻞ
ﻣﺎﺣﺼﻞﭘﺎﺳﺦﻫﺎﻯﻣﺤﺒﻴﺎﻥﺑﻪﺳﻮﺍﻻﺕﻣﺎﺩﺭﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺑﺎﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥﺍﺯﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﺍﺳﺖ.
***
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴـﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﭼﻪﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﻘﻄﻪﻧﻈــﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻭ ﻃﻴﻒﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﺸــﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﺡ
ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻧﻘﺪﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘــﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ
ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺿﻰ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ
28
ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻯ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻀﺎﺡ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺸــﻰﻫﺎ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎ،
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺘــﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻗﺖ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻨﻈﺮﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖﺩﻭﻟﺖﻣﻄﺮﺡﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﻭﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰﻧﻴﺰﺗﻨﻬﺎﺑﺮﻃﺮﺡﻧﻜﺎﺕ
ﻣﻨﻔﻰﭘﺎﻓﺸﺎﺭﻯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺍﻭﻝﭘﺲﺍﺯﻃﺮﺡﻧﻜﺎﺕﻣﻨﻔﻰﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻓــﻊ ﻭ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰﺭﺍﺑﺮﻫﺮﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯﻣﻘﺪﻡﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻰﻧﻴﺰ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻋﻮﺍﻗﺐ ﺳﻮء ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ،ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕﺧﻮﺩﻧﻴﺰﭘﺎﻓﺸﺎﺭﻯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺍﻭﺻﺎﻑ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳـﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﮕﺮﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﮕﺮﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺯﻳﺮﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﺍﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟
ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻧﻄﻖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ
ﻳﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ؟
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳــﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻋﻀــﺎﻯ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺑـﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺭﻫﺒـﺮﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻮﻳﻰ
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻄﺌﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻣﺮﺯ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸﺎﺕ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ؟
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕــﺮﺍ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﻉ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕــﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﺸــﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻫﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺩﻳﻦ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻯ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ
ﻧﻘــﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺷــﺨﺎﺹ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮ ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺑــﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣــﺪﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ
ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑــﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺧــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻤــﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻀﺎﺡ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺎﺧﺼﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺗﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﺗﻨﺎﻗﻀﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﮕﻴــﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺗــﻼﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓــﺖ .ﺩﺍﻳــﺮﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻴــﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﻄﺌﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺤــﺚ ﺭﻫﺒــﺮﻯ ﺻﺪﻣــﻪ ﻧﺰﻧﺪ.
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻉ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥﺗﻨﻬﺎﺑﺤﺚﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘـﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﮔﻼﻳﻪ ﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ
»ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻣﻮﻛﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻐﺘﻨﻢ ﺷــﻤﺮﺩﻥ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺼﻴﺤﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ،ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ«؛ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋــﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻛﻢﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ
ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺧــﻼﻑ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺳــﺮﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ .ﭘﺲ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ؟ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖﺑﺪﻧﻲ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻛﻨــﺶ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻋﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻏﺮﻳﺒــﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺳــﺮﻳﻊ ﻭ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻣﻜﺎﺭﻡﺷــﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ ،ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﺟﻮﺍﺩ
ﺗﺒﺮﻳﺰﻱ ،ﺁﻳــﺖﺍﷲ ﻓﺎﺿﻞﻟﻨﻜﺮﺍﻧﻲ ،ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻓــﻲ ﮔﻠﭙﺎﻳﮕﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻧﻮﺭﻱﻫﻤﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺗﻘﻠﻴــﺪﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻃﻲ
ﻓﺘﺎﻭﺍ ﻭ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻣﻜﺎﺭﻡ ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻣﺸــﻮﺭﺕ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﻲ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻣﻴﺮﺯﺍﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺗﺒﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺘﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛــﺮﺩ» :ﺩﺭ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ)ﻋﺞ( ﺍﻣﻴــﺪ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺧﻼﻑ ﺷﺮﻉ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ
ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻭ ﻣﻮﻣﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﻠﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻛﻦ
ﻣﺰﺑﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻓﺴــﺎﺩﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺎﺏ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﺰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ «.ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻓﻲ ﮔﻠﭙﺎﻳﮕﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ
ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﻧﺐ ﻣﻜﺮﺭ
ﺧﻄﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻀﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﻋﻔﺎﻑ ﻭ ﺣﺠﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻗﺐ ﺳﻮء ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﺩﺍﺏ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻡ ،ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﻣﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺣﺴــﺐﺍﻟﻮﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺣﺮﻣﺖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﺟﻨﺒﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺟﻤﻴﻊ ﻓﻘﻬﺎﻱ ﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺬﺍ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺷﺮﻉ ﻭ ﺗﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺼﺒﺎﺡﻳﺰﺩﻱ
ﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ
ﺩﻭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺷﻔﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺠﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺮﺟﺎ
ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺴــﺎﺩ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﻧﻢﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ
ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﮕﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ «.ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺯﺍﺭ ﺗﻨﻬــﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺍﻭ ﺷــﺘﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﺷﻤﻘﺪﺭﻱ ،ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻨﺜﻲﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐــﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻃﺌﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﺷــﻤﻨﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﮔﻔﺖ:
»ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻃﻼﻳﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺯﻭﺩ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ «.ﺁﺭﻱ،
ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺭﺯﺷــﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻨــﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ،ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺸــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﮔﻼﻳﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺳﺎﻃﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊﺷــﺪﻩﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﺍﻣــﺎ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻧﺸــﺪ .ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺟﻮﺍﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﻠﻲ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﮔﻔﺖ؛ ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ »ﻫﺎﻟﻪ
ﻧﻮﺭ« .ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺟﻮﺍﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﻠﻲ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻓﺶ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺟﻮﺍﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﺷــﺪ .ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ
ﺩﻓﺘﺮﺵ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﺨﻨﮕﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﻧﺘﺎژ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺟﻮﺍﺩﻱﺁﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻭ
ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨــﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﺮﻓــﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﺳﻪ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ
ﻓﻘﻂ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻼﻡﻧﻈــﺮ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﻣﺮﺍﺟــﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ .ﺣﺘﻲ
ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻣﺸــﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺗﻔــﺎﻕ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺳــﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺯﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﻪﺍﻱ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮﺯﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺮﺍﺟــﻊ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺷﺪ .ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺯﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭘﺲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺲﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺎﻳﻌﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮﺯﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﭘﺲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻲﺩﺭﭘﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻣﺒﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺧﻂ ﺑﻄﻼﻧﻲ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﺎﺕ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻘﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺭﻳﺎ ،ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻱ ﻗﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨــﺎﺏ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺯﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻳﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ «.ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻧﺘﺨــﺎﺏ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻫﺮ ﺳــﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻢ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻭ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
29
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻌﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺦ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻴﺮﻱ
ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
»ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﺶ ،ﺧﻮﺩﺭﺍﻳﻰﻫﺎ،
ﻧﺪﺍﻧﻢﻛﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺖﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺷﻤﺎ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﮋﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺗﻨﮓ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ «.ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴــﻴﻦ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ،ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ
ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻭ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻣﺘﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻣﻼﺣﻈﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ:
»ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺼﻴﺤﺖ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻋﻴﻮﺏ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﻧﺪﻫﻴﺪ .ﺳﻌﻰ ﻧﻔﺮﻣﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺍﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﻰﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺿﺎﺕ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻓﻌﻠﺸــﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺒﺮﺍ ﺑﻨﻤﺎﻳﻴﺪ «.ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﭼﺮﺍ ﺳﺨﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﺸﻢﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻲ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻫﺮﺍﺯﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
30
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ
ﺭﺩﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻦ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻣﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭ
ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻣﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ« .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺼﻮﻥ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻌﺶ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﻪﮔﺮ ﺗﺨﻔﻴﻒ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻧﺎ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ
ﻣﺸــﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻣﻦ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮ ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﻨﻢ؟ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﺪ؟ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮﻱ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺷــﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴــﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﺍﺵ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺸﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﺪﺱ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺁﺷﻔﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﻪﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻲﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺳﺮﺩﺭﮔﻤﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ.
ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﺪﺱ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻭ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ »ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ
ﻗﺪﺱ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺛﻰ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ
ﺗﺎ ﻭﺟﺪﺍﻥﺗﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺳﻮﺍﻻﺗﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﻫﻴﺪ «.ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ
ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻭﺟﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ» :ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ،ﺳﻪ ﻣﺎﻩ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺛﻰ ﮔﺰﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺑﺮﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻻﺑﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﻰ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻗﺼﺪ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻢ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﺎﺏ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻰ ﺍﺛﺮ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ» :ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﺎﻥ ،ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻨﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺿﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻛﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﺿﺎﻥ ﺑﻰﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻛﺮﺩ «.ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻠﻤﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺭﻓﻊ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ» :ﺁﻳﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﺿﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻧﻢ ﻓﺪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺧﻄﺮﻯ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺣﺮﻓﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻰﺍﻳﺴــﺘﻨﺪ؟ ﺟﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ،ﻳﻚ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﺑﺮﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﻰﻧﺸﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ(ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺟﺎﻧﻔﺸﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻏﺮﻭﻟﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻼﻣﺖ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ؟
ﻣﻮﻛﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﻧﺎﻓﻰ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﺿﺎﻥ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺭﺳــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﺎﻥ .ﺣﻖ ﻫﺮﻛﺲ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﺩﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺧﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ
ﻭﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﻲﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻖ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺴﺖﻋﻨﺼﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻛــﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌــﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺣﻘﻲ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ؟
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻫﺸــﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ» :ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺳﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻠﻊ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺰﻭﻯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ؟ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ«.
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻔﻘﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﻴﺮ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ» ،ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻰ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﻫﺎ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
5ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﻚ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱ ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ
ﺷــﺪ .ﻧﻘﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ؛ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﭘﻴﺶﺭﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺳﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺮﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﺣﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻫﻢ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷــﺪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ
ﻫﻢﻃﻴﻔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﻧﺶ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻧﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺻﺐ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ،ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺻﺪﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺪﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﭙﺮﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﻤــﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻃﻴﻔﻲﺍﺵ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﻌﻲ ﻧﻨﻬﺎﺩﻩ ،ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺗﻨﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳــﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ -ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮﺍﻧﺶ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻧﺪ -ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﻲ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺯ 4ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺗﺎ ﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﺎﻗﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ
ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ
ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ.
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺮﺁﻥ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﻌﺐ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑــﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﻤﻼﺕ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻭ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷــﺒﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻄﺎﻱ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻟﻘﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ،ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻧﺸﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻬــﺮﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔــﺮﻭﻩ ،ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﻤــﺪ ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﺳﺮﺳــﺨﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﻧﻬــﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻋﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩ ﻭ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺑﺴــﺰﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻱﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻬــﺮﻩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﺪﻱ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ
ﺭﻧﮓ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﻳﺪ.
ﭘﺲﺍﺯﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞﺩﻭﻟﺖﻧﻬﻢﺍﻣﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭﻩﺩﻛﺘﺮﻣﺤﻤﺪﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﺻﻒ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺖ .ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﭘﺴﺘﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺭﺩﺍﻱ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ
ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺪ.
ﻧﻄﻖﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻲﺩﺭﭘﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﻤﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ .ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺳــﺒﺤﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻄﻖﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻮﻣﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﺸــﻐﻮﻝ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﺎﻗﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺒﻖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣــﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻗﻴــﺐ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻬﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺩ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﻮﻳــﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗــﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﺵ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺑﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺎﻧﺲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﭘﻴــﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒــﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﺎﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻗﺒﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻔﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒــﺎﻑ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺟﺪﻯ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺻﻒ ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩ
ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲﻣﺮﺗﻀﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸــﺘﻢ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻭ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ
ﺗﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻮﺛﺮﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺎﻳــﮕﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻔﺎﻓﻪ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ
ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸﻴﺐ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ
31
ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ
ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ
ﻭﻻﻳﺖﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺴــﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ
ﺭﺣﻴﻢﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﮔﻔﺖ:
»ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ
ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ«.
ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮگ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻓﺘﺎﺡ
ﻭ ﻟﻨﻜﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻻﻳــﺖ ﺁﻥﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ؟«
ﺍﻣــﺎ ﻋﻠــﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑــﻪ ﻳﻜــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺿﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻲ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳــﺪ ﺍﮔــﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻬــﺎﻡ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ،
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮﻱ ﺭﻓﺘــﺎﺭ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻲ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ
ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺣﺎﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠــﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﺶ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﻧﮓ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻲ ﺧﻄــﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ:
»ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﺴــﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺗﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﺷﻠﻴﻚ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﻬــﺮﻱ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﻳﻢ«.
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻪﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻧﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻌﻨﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻭﻛﻴﻞﺍﻟﺪﻭﻟﻪ
ﻣﻲﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﻘــﺐ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻻﺑﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴﺰﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﺵ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻳﺎ ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻱ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﺩﻭﺷــﺎﺩﻭﺵ ﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺳــﺨﺖ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺗﻮﭘﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺑﻪ
ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻳﻚ ﭘﻠﻪ ﺗﻨﺰﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻲ ﻧﺎﻳﺐ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﺪﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ
ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲﺍﺵ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﺮﻭﺯ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﺎﺯﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ
ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻭ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؛ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺳﺎﻳﺖ »ﺍﻟﻒ« ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﺶ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
32
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑــﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺻــﺪﺍﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺸﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺧﺮﺩﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﺎ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗــﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﮔﻼﻳﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﻭ ﺭﻗﻴــﺐ ﺩﻳــﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ
ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﻃﻖ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻧﺘﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷــﺨﺼﺎ
ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﺷﺪ .ﺷﻬﺮﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺘﻮﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻛﻼﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺳﺮ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺴﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ.
ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑــﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺴــﻨﺪ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ.
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﻩ ﺷــﺪ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﻜﺲ ﻇﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ
ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺴــﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬــﻢ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻘﻴﻦ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻲ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ
ﻣﻠﻲ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺯﺩ.
ﺍﻭ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺯﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﺎﺏ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻋﻄﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻟﻘﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪ.
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗــﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻗﻢ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﻫﻢ ﺷــﺪ .ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﭘﻴﺸــﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺴــﺘﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻫﻢﻃﺮﺍﺯ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺗﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻴﺰ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻔﺎﻓﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.ﭼﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ،
ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻨﺰ ﺗﺸﺒﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻠﻚ ﺑﺮ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺳﺨﺖ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﺭﺋﻴﺴﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺣﺪﺍﺩ ﻋﺎﺩﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ
ﺑﻨﺸﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺰﻧﺪ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺧﻼﺻﻲ ﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ.
ﺣﺒﻴﺐﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﻮﺗﻠﻔﻪ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ .ﺍﻭ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻣﺘﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﺛﻮﻕ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫــﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﻣﺸــﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺳــﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺑــﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫــﺎ ﻳــﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎ
ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﺳــﺎﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ» :ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﺳﻒﺑﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﺷﻜﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺬﺭ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﻥ ﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻘﺸــﻪ ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﻫــﻢ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑــﺮ ﺁﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻣﺪﺑﺮﺍﻧﻪ ،ﺩﻟﺠﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺳــﻴﺐﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺷــﺎﺕ
ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺸــﺮﻳﺢ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻴﻴــﻦ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﺿﺪﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻃﺌﻪ ﺷــﻮﻡ ،ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻠﺨﻲﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺟﺒــﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ،ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ
ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺸــﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ
ﺭﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻔﻲ ﺑﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﺘﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴــﺖ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓــﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺟــﻊ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ
ﻭ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺣﻴــﺮﺕﺁﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺣﻀﺮﺕﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺰﻝ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻴﺮﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ
»ﻣﺮﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ«؛ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﻘﺐ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ
ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻴﺎﺑﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴــﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﺳــﺨﺖ ﺟﺎﻧﺸــﻴﻦ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺷــﺨﺺ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؛ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﺶ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
»ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻒ« ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻲﺍﺵ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻮﺛﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻓﻘــﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻭ
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺝ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺗﺶ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ.ﺍﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸــﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻋﻴﺎﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺸــﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨــﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺗﻨﺪﻭﺗﻴﺰﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺷﻔﺎﻑ
ﻭ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻧﺶ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺩﻫﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﻃﻲ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﻪﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺻﺪﺍﻱ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻪ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ
»ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﻯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؛
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﺑﺸﺨﻮﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﻣﺎ
ﻫﻴﭻﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢﻛﺮﺩ«.ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳﻢﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ،
ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤـﻼﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘـﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻣﻲﭘـﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕـﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﻌﺎﺕ ﺷـﻴﻮﻩ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﺳـﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻌﻪﺻﺪﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ
ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺳﻌﻪﺻﺪﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ «.ﻭﻯ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺷـﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺳـﺮﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳـﺨﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳـﺖ؛ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺮﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻰ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺩﻫﻤﻴـﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺑﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻳﻚﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻱ
ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺗﻚﺻﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺷﻮﺩ «.ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﻘﺎﺳـﻢ ﺭﺋﻮﻓﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻰ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌـﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫـﺎﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕـﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺳـﺨﻦ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
***
ﺻﺮﻳﺢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳـﻚ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﻴﺴـﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺗـﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧـﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ،ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺪﺍﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻆ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﻋﻴﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﺗﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻰﭼﻮﻥ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﺟــﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸــﻰ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﺸﻢﭘﻮﺷــﻰ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺻﺪ
ﺑﺎ ﭼﺸﻢﭘﻮﺷــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻــﻼﺡ ﻧﻮﺍﻗﺺ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﺳﺮﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺳــﺮﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻴﺎﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻰﻫﺎ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺗــﻼﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ،ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﻧﻘﺪ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻂ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﻥﺭﻓﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻰ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷـﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺷـﻴﻮﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻣﺒﻨﻰﺑﺮ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺍﺯ
ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻂ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﺸﻮﻧﺪ؟
ﺑﻨــﺪﻩ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻳــﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﺑﻨــﺪﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻭ
ﻭ ﻣﺸﻰ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ .ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ
ﻭ ﻗﻮﺗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﻗﻮﺕ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻧﻤﻲﺗﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧــﻪ ،ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕــﺮﺍ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ
ﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻰ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺸﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻘــﺎﻁ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻰ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺻﻮﻟﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻴــﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨــﻰ ﻋﺎﻡ ﺁﻥ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻯﮔﺸﺎﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺳــﻨﺠﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺼﻠﺢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ،ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ
ﺳﻴﻨﻪﮔﺸﺎﺩﻩ ،ﺭﻭﻯ ﮔﺸﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺵ
ﺗﺎ ﺧﺴﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ
ﺷــﻨﻮﺍ ﺗﻌﺎﺑﻴﺮﻯ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻰﭼﻮﻥ
ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬــﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﻭﺟﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺑﺮﺧـﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﺎﻣﻴـﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﺑـﺎ
ﻧﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ،ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻋﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺗﺎﺑــﻊ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﺑﻰﭼﻮﻥ
ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳـﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ
ﻭ ﭼــﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺧــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻋﻴــﺎﻥ
ﺗﺨﻄﺌﻪﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﻘــﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺗﺨﻄﺌــﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ
33
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻗــﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃــﺮﺡ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴــﺮﻯ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻰ ﺍﭘﻮﺯﻳﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻰ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ ﻭ
ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺒﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻـﻼﺡ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻓﺎﺋﻖ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻭ ﻛﮋﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﻯ
ﻣﺮﻫﻮﻥ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﺒﺎﻳــﺪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺖ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻗــﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷــﺨﺺ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟــﺐ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ
ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺑــﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺷـﻴﻮﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧـﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺳـﺖ؟ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﻯ
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻋﻘﺪ ﺍﺧﻮﺕ ﻧﺒﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻰﭼﻮﻥ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻣﻌﻈﻢﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﻳﻦﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﭘﺲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﺑﻼﺷﺮﻁ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻳﻦ
ﺷﺮﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸﺎﺕ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺼﺐﺍﻟﻌﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺳﻌﻪﺻﺪﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺳــﺎﻟﻢ ﻭ ﻛﻢﺧﻄﺎ
ﻭ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺳﻌﻪ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ
ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻫــﻢ ﻋﻘﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺫﺍﺋﻘﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺷــﻴﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫـﺎﻯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺿﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ .ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺤﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﺩﻭﻟﺖﻧﻬﻢﻣﻄﺮﺡﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ،ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﺑﺎﻳﺪﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﺑﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ.ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺗﻨﻔﻴﺬ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺧﻂ ﻣﺸﻰ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
34
ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ؟
ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺰﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣــﺪﻥ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺣﻮﺍﺷــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺩ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖﻫــﺎﻯ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺸــﻢ ﻭ
ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺳﺮﺁﻏﺎﺯﻯ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺗﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻮﭘﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺷﺪ؛ ﺗﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻝ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻣﻰ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ
ﺑــﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺖ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺯﻣﺎﻧــﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟــﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﺳﺨﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ،
ﺣﺴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ،ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﺑﻮﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺭﺿﺎ ﺧﺎﺩﻡ
ﺳﺮﺷــﻨﺎﺱﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻄﻖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ،
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﻄﻖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ
ﺭﻭﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ.
ﻋﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕــﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻄﻖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﻜﺪﺳــﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﺑﺴــﺘﻦ ﺑﺮ
ﺗﻤــﺎﻡ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺷــﻜﻨﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﺑــﻮﺩ» :ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﻩ ﻋﻤﻞﮔﺮﺍﻳــﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬــﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻭ
ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻜﺠﺎﻧﺒــﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ
ﺣﻘــﻮﻕ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﻇﺎﻫﺮﮔﺮﺍﻳــﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ
ﺑﺎ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ،
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺎﺫﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴــﺎﺕ ،ﺗﻮﻫﻢﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ
ﺳﻤﺒﻮﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺑﺴﻂ ﺟﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺸﺮﻱﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻡﺯﺩﮔﻲ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺳﺎﻧﺴــﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺣﺲ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﺖ ،ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ
ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ،ﻣﺼﺎﻧﻌﻪ ،ﻣﺪﺍﻫﻨﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻤﻠﻖ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺯﻧﻴﺪ؟« ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺗﻘﻨﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻞﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺗﺬﻛﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﻫﺪﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻗﺎﻃﻌﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ «.ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺝ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻡ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺝ ﻭ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﭼﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ،ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﮔﺮﺩﺷــﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺩﺳــﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺷــﺘﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻗﻀﺎﺋﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﻛﻼﻥ ،ﺭﻭﺍﺝ ﺑﻲﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻛﻴﺎﻭﻟﻴﺴﻢ
ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎ
ﺑﻲﺛﻤﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ «.ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻄﻖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ» :ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺘﻲ ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻣﻨﺪﻱ
ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ -ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻌﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟«
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻋــﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻓﺮﻭﻍ ،ﻣﺤﻤــﺪ ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺴــﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺗﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻴﺰﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻭﻯ ﺑــﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ
ﺷــﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰﺍﺵ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖﮔﺴﺘﺮﻯ ،ﻣﻬﺮﻭﺭﺯﻯ،
ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﺸﺘﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺳﻔﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ،ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﺶ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﮕﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻃﻰ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺸــﻦ
ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﺭﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ«.
ﻭﻯ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ،ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻮﺍﻯ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺗﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸــﺎﻥ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖﮔﺴﺘﺮﻯ ،ﻣﻬﺮﻭﺭﺯﻯ ،ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﺸﺘﻰ ﻭ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺳﻔﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ...ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ
ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻴﺖﺯﺩﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻭ ﻗﺸﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﮋﺩﻩ
ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻢ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻼﻙ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ
ﻧﻘﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷــﺖ
ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻂ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺣﺼﻞ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻌﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ 40ﻣﺎﻩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﮔﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ،ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻣﻬﺮﻭﺭﺯﻯ
ﻭ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﺸــﺘﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ» :ﻣﻨﻄﻖ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ 60ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳــﭙﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥﻣﺪﺕ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺧﻼﻑ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ 20
ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺩﺳﺖ ﻫﺮ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﻬﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺧﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ؛ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﺟﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ
ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﻭﻯ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻟﺒﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﻣﺘﻤﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﻤﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ
ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﺭﺯﻯ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
54ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻰ ﻭ
ﻣﻴﻮﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ،ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ» :ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻯ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﻯﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﻭﻯ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺎﺧﺼﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ،ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﻣﺴــﻜﻦ ﻭ ﺳﺮﭘﻨﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺟﻬﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻧﺎﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺁﺷــﻔﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻣﺴﻜﻦ ﻭ
ﻓﻘﻴﺮﺗﺮ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ «.ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻫﺪﻑﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﭘﺮﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ«.
ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
ﺩﺳــﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓــﺶ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔــﺖ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻧﮕﺮﻯ،
ﻋﺪﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻊﻧﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳــﻼﻳﻖ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺝ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺎﺣﺼﻞ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ »ﺗﺤﻜﻢ« ﻭ »ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ«
ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ،ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ
ﺑﻪﺭﻏــﻢ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻋــﺚ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ«.
ﻭﻯ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺗﺬﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻔﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ »ﺗﻮﻫﻢ« ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﺍﺕ
ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺣﻔﻆ »ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻢﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ«
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻗﺒﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻯ »ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ« ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ«.
ﺣﺴــﻦ ﺳــﺒﺤﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗﻮﺭﻯ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ
ﺯﻣــﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻒ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﻮﻩ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻯ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ
ﻻﻳﺤﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨــﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫــﺎ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ» :ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺧﻮﺵﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺝ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺎﺣﺼﻞ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ :ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ »ﺗﺤﻜﻢ« ﻭ »ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ«
ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻧﻘﺪﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺣﺎﻣﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳــﻢ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻴﻦ »ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥﻓﺮﻭﺷــﻰ« ﻭ »ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ«
ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻧﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻃﺮﺣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ؟« ﻭﻯ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻡ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ 87ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻧﻘﺪﻯ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﺴــﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻭﺭﻯ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﺻــﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺗــﻮﺭﻡ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺗــﻮﺭﻡ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳــﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺣﺎﻣﻞﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﻘﺪﻯ ،ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﺎﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺼﺮﻑﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﻭ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺪﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑــﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﻤﻞ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ«.
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﺑﻮﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻄﻖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﻭ
ﺗﺬﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﻤﺎﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺗﻨﮓ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺮﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ؛ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ؟ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ؟« ﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ،ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺯﺣﻤﺖ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ 20 .ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺖ
20ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺘﺮﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ «.ﺍﺑﻮﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳــﺖ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﻤﻴﺴﻴﻮﻥ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺭﻭﻛﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺳﺪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺭﺑﻄﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﻣﺎ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺭﻭﻛﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻗﺸــﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷــﻜﺎﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﭘﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺷــﻜﺎﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ «.ﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰﻛﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻰﭼﻮﻥ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ:
»ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ
ﺣﺰﺏ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﻳﻢ ،ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺣﺰﺏ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﭘﻴــﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ،ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺣﺰﺏ
ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻛــﺮﺩ ﺣﺰﺑﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺣﺰﺏﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘــﻢ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺻﺒﺎﺣﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕــﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺳــﺘﻴﻀﺎﺡ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ،ﺗﺬﻛــﺮﺍﺕ ﭘﻰﺩﺭﭘﻰ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ ﺭﺣﻴﻢﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ
ﻭ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﮔﻤﺸﺪﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
35
ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻳﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ؛ﻳﻚﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﻮ
ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻩ ﺷﻔﻴﻌﻲ
»ﻫــﺮ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ«؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻳﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻰ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﻳﻨــﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻳﺎ
ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻛﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻃﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻯ ﻧﺎﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ،ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻣﻨﺼﺒﻰ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﺮ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻯ ﻛﻢﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻰ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﺩ ﺍﻭ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺷــﻴﺪﻯ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ
ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻓﺘﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺮﺍﺳــﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨــﺎﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻨﺼﺐ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻟــﻰ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺩﻓﺘﺮﻯ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻓﺮﺍ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
»ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ «.ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻼﺕ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻓﻄﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳــﻌﻴﺪﻟﻮﻳﻰ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻙ ﭘﺎﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﻧﻰ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻰ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻯ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺎﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ،
ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ -ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺷــﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺳــﻔﻴﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻴﺐ
ﻛﺘﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺭﻗﺼﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻢ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﺳﺖ
ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮ ﺯﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﻮﺯ
ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﺍﺟﻼﺱ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﮕﺮﻯ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ
ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﻯ ﺭﻗﺺ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﭼﺎپ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﺤﻤﻴــﻞ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳــﻢ ﺭﻗﺺ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﺘﺮ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺫﻫﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﺘﺮ
ﻧﺸﺪ .ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ
ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺤﻮ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮﺑﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺭﻗﺺ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ
ﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺧﺸﻢ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻯ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪﻳﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﻋﻜﺲ
ﻳﺎﺩﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺻﻠﺖ ﭘﺴﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ
ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻰ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻭﺝ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪﻩ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻭ 200ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎﺕﻋﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
36
ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﻧﺪﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺧﻄﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭﺩﺳــﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺪﺭﻋﺮﻭﺱ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻦﺗﺮﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺮ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻼﻣــﺖ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺫﻫﺎﻥ
ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻘﺒﻞ
ﺷــﻮﺩ؟ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﻫﻤﺎﻳﺸﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ 18ﺁﺑﺎﻥ 1387ﺭﺥ
ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ 12،ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ،ﺩﻑﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺳﻦ
ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻰ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ
ﺭﻳﺘﻤﻴــﻚ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﻗﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺳــﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗــﺮﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻓﻰﮔﻠﭙﺎﻳﮕﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲﻣﻜﺎﺭﻡ ﺷــﻴﺮﺍﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺗﻨﺪﻯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺩﺍﺷﺖ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥﻭﻯﺑﻪﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﺩﺍﺩﻭﺩﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﻗﺮﺁﻥﻛﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﻭﺿﻮ ﻣﻰﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺑﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﺳﺪ ﺳﻴﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺮﺍﺝ
ﺳﺮ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﺨﺎﻣﻨﺸﻰ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻗﺖ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ »ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ«
ﺍﺑﻮﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻴﻨﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ..ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﻭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻴــﺮﺍﺙ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﻭ ﮔﺮﺩﺷــﮕﺮﻱ ﺑــﺎ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫــﺎﻱ ﻫــﺮ ﻣﺎﻫﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﺑــﺎﺯ ﻫــﻢ ﺻﻨﺪﻟــﻲ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﭘﺎﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ
ﮔﺮﻓــﺖ .ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳــﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴــﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻨــﺪ ،ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﺴــﺎﺕ ﻫﻴــﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬــﻢ ﺁﺏ ﭘﺎﻛﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﺳــﺖ
ﺗﻤــﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺭﻳﺨــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌــﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺷــﻮﻛﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻏﻼﻣﺤﺴﻴﻦ
ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲﺍژﻩﺍﻱ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺻﻔﺎﺭ ﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺴﻨﻲ ﺍژﻩﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺻﻔﺎﺭ ﻫﺮﻧﺪﻱ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺽ ،ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻗﺸﺮ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﺽ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻍ ﺩﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻳﻚ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻜﺎﺭﻡﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨــﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺤــﺖ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻧــﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴــﻦ ﺍﺑﻮﺗﺮﺍﺑﻲﻓــﺮﺩ ،ﻧﺎﻳﺐ ﺭﺋﻴــﺲ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﺰﻝ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺸــﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻓﺸﺎﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺠﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﮓ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻟﺠﻮﻳﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ،ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ
ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓــﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑــﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺳﻴﺪﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻨﺎﻡ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻣﺪﺭﺳــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻫــﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﻗﺎﻃﻊ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻯﺍﺵ
ﺭﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻃﺎﻋﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ «.ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ
ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻈﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﺩ
ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻨﺸﺴﺘﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻲ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﻱ ،ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﭘﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺴﺘﻲ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ ،ﺩﺍﻣﺎﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﺪﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﭘﺴﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻓﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡﺁﻟﻮﺩ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ،ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺳﺨﻨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﻭ ...ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻓﺘﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ 8ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﻔﺎﻱ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﺳــﺨﻨﮕﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻮﺍﻻﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ
ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳــﻢ ﺗﻮﺩﻳﻊ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻓﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺗﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻴﺮﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﺠﻠﺴﻴﺎﻥ» :ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ
ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺭﺣﻴﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻡ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﻋﻴﺪﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻓﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ
ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻭ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻴﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﻙ
ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ» .ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳــﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺷﺪ«.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴــﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬــﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺠﻤﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﮓ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻟﺠﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ،ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ
ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺩﻟﺠﻮﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺩﻓﺘﺮﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻲﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭﻛﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺎﻥﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲﺍﻋﻼﻡﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ،ﺍﻭﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥﻧﺰﺩﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺎﻝ 92ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺸــﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧــﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱﺩﻭﻟﺖﺭﺍﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮﺍﺯﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲﺑﺮﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ
ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻭﺭﺯﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ؟« ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻧﺘﺎﺑﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﺷــﺨﺼﻲﺍﺵ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ:
»ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺬﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ «.ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 42ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻰ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻰ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ :
-1ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻰ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ -2ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻴﺎﻥ -3ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺛﻨﻰ ﻋﺸﺮﻯ.
ﺷﻴﺦ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﺯﻣﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻪ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ » .ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ«
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﻴﺦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﺲ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ »ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ« ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1385ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻛﺸﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺳﻌﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻭﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪﺷﻜﺎﻓﻲﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻳﻤﻦﻭﺩﻻﻳﻞﻭﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞﺁﻥ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻳﻤﻦ؛ ﻧﺰﺍﻋﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻓﻀﻠﻲ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﮔﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ
ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺣﻲ ﺷــﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﻬﺪﺍﻡ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﺿﺎﻧﺶ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻤﻖ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﺧﻮﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺁﺳﻴﺎ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﻛﻨﮕﺮﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺎﻧﺒــﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺻﻨﻌﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ.ﺩﺭ ﻧﺰﺍﻉ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺐ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻫﻢ ،ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳــﻌﻮﺩﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ
ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ
ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺿﻠﻊ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻈﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﺨﻔﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺎﺋﻠﻪ ﺧﻮﻧﻴﻦ
ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
1990ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻲﺩﺭﭘﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻋــﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺑﻴــﻜﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ
ﺑﺪﻫﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 2002ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﮕﻔﺖ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻨﺎﻣﻪ »ﺩﻭﺣﻪ« ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ »ﺻﻌﺪﻩ« ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻠﻐﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺷﺪ.
ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋــﻪ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔــﺮﺩﺩ؛ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1962ﻃﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺯﻳﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺳﺘﻴﺰ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲﻃﻠﺒﻲ ،ﺁﻣﺎﺝ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﺿﺎﻥ ﭼﺮﺧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ 90ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻄﺮ
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﻳﻤﻨﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻠﻔﻲ ﻭ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﺑﻪ ﺭﻭ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ
ﺑﻦﻻﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻫﺰﺍﺩﮔﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺳــﻌﻮﺩﻱ ،ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺪﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺻﻨﻌﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ ﺩﺭﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺷــﻴﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻲ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺷﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻮﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ
38
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 2004ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻫﻪ 80ﻗﺮﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻮ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ
2002ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ ﺍﷲﺍﻛﺒﺮ ،ﻣــﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ،
ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ،ﻟﻌﻨﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻳﻬﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺷــﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺭﺳــﻤﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.ﺳﺎﻝ 2003ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺟﺪ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺿﺪﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺿﺪﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ 650ﺗﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺭﺳﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﻞ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺯﻳﺪﻱﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ،ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺁﺏ ،ﺑﺮﻕ ،ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ ،ﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻥ
ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺳــﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﺮﺳــﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻏﺬﺍﻳﻲ ،ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ
ﻓﺎﺟﻌﻪﺑﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴــﻞ ﺗﺎﺛﻴــﺮ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳــﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺯﻳﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻡﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ)ﺭﻩ( ﻭ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﺑــﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ )ﺭﻫﺒــﺮ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ( ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﺩﺭﺳﻲ
ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺷﻤﻨﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺿﺪﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ ،ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ
ﺻﻨﻌﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﮕﻨﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ.ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭ ﺻﻨﻌﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﺮﻗﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺒﺎﻳﻞ
ﺳﻨﻲ ﺳﺎﻛﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﻮﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ،ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻋﻠﻲﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﺸﻦ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ،ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ،ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻮءﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ،ﺧﺴﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻌﻪﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﭘﻮﺵ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺑﺮﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺳــﻮء ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻓﻜﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ،ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺷﻮﺭﺷﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
1964ﺳﺎﻗﻂ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺪﺩﺍ ﺍﺣﻴﺎ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺳــﻌﻮﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺴــﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺳﻌﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺗﺎﺛﻴــﺮﺍﺕ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺮ ﻃﻴﻒ
ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻧﻔﺖﺧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺳﺎﻛﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺠﺎﻭﺭﺕ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻱﺗﺒﺎﺭ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺸﺎ
ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﻳﺎﺽ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﺎﻭﺭﺕ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻋﻠﻲﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﻭ ﺷﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺗﻲ ﭘﻴﺶﺩﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻓﻜﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ
ﺑــﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﻐﺮﻧﺞ ﻛﻨﻮﻧــﻲ ﺩﺭﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻟﻴﺒﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣــﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳــﺪﻱ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴــﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻋﺮﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺳــﻌﻮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺮﺯﻩ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﻄﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺳــﺎﻃﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﻀﻴــﻪ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﻭﺣﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ،ﻣﻘﺼــﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺩﻭﺣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 2008ﻣﻴــﻼﺩﻱ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻴــﺮ ﻗﻄﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺻــﻼﺡ ﺑﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻴــﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻔﻮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻃﺮﻑ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛــﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ
ﺣﺰﺏ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﻭﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﻮﻧﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺳــﺎﻃﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﺳﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﻛﺸﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﻲ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻨﻲﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺻﺎﻑ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻞ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺰﺍﻉ ﻟﺠﺎﻡﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺗﻠﺦﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺍژﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺪﺍﺩﻱ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺠﺎﻝ ﻳﺎﺭﻱﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺳﻴﺪ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ؛ ﭼﺮﻳﻚ -ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮگﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻰ
ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﺴﺮﻭﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ
ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﻗﻴــﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧــﺪ؛ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﺰﻟــﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺷــﻮﻛﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ.
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻱ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻔﻨﮓ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻫﻢ
ﺑﺮﻳﺰﻧﺪ .ﻓﺮﻭﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؛ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﻏﺮﺏ
ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺸﺮﻕ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ .ﭼﻪ ﻛﻴﺸﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﭼﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻳﺰﻣﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﺑﺮﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺭﻳﺰﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻒ ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻥ ﺳــﻴﻨﻪﭼﺎﻙ ﭘﻮﭘﻮﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡﺑﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻧﺪ.
ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ،ﻣﺜﻞ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﺑﭙﻮﺷﺪ ،ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﻮﭘﻮﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺟﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ
ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﺎﺯﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺯﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺯﻭﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻔﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺭﻧﺠﻚ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻝ ﺳــﻌﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭘﺸــﺘﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺣﻮﺛﻲ ﻭ ﺳــﻠﻔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺷﺸــﻢ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳــﻴﺪ .ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮگ ﺩﺍﺭﻧــﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮﮔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻠﻔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻓﻠﻪ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺸﻴﺪ.
ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ،ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﻠﺖﺍﻟﻌﻠﻞ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺑﻮﺗﻪ ﺑﻲﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﭼﺮﺍﻍ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ 1964
ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﺑﺮ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺳﻠﻄﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺳﻠﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺷﻮﻛﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺰﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1964ﻭﺭﻕ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ،ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻳﻞ
ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺷﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻏﻮﻃﻪﻭﺭ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺥﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻮﺥﻫﺎ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟــﻮژﻱ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺘﻬﺪﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻱﻣﺴﻠﻚ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ
ﻫﺮ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂﺑﻐﺮﻧﺞﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱﻭﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲﺯﻳﺪﻱﻫﺎﺑﻮﺩ.ﭘﺲﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺯﻣﺰﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﻪ
ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺴﻨﺪﻳﺪ.
ﭘﺲ ﺳﺎﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺯﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﻨﮓﺑﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ .ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺳــﻨﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺪﻋﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻠﻚ ﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻳﺪ .ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﻻﻳﺶ ﺳﻨﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺍﺛﻨﻲﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﻭﺯ ﻋﺎﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﻭ ﺟﺸــﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻟﻐﺪﻳﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺟﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﺩ
ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺒﻞ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﺷﺪ .ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﻢ ﻋﺎﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻏﺪﻳﺮﺧﻢ
ﺍﺯ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺗﺤﻮﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻨﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤــﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻼﻓﺖ ﺍﺑﻮﺑﻜﺮ ،ﻋﺜﻤــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﻭ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ( ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺭﺩﺳﺮﺳــﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺯﻳﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ
ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻤﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺟﺪ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ
ﺷﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺳﻨﺖ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻜﻔﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺰﻧﺪ ﺗﻬﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻛﻴﻨﻪﻭﺭﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﭘﺴﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﭼﻢ
ﭘﺪﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺪ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻚ ﺣﻮﺛﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺭﺍﻩ ﭘﺪﺭ ﺳﻨﮓ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮگ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ژﻧﺮﺍﻝ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﺍﻥ
ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺛﻨﻲﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ.
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺗﺸﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻋﻄﺶ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻳﺰﻣﺎﺗﻴﻚ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﮔﺮﺍ ﺳﻴﺮﺍﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﮔﺮﭼــﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺪﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴــﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻋﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﻜــﻢ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺍﻭ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ
ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺍﻧﺶ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻭ
ﺯﻭﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭘﺲ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺟﻬﺎﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺎﻣﺘﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪﻭﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﻫﻢﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥﺩﺍﻍﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪﺻﻌﺪﻩﺑﻪﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺳــﻠﺤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻋﺰﺕ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺣﻮﺛﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺠﻬﺰ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻱﺯﻭﺭﺩﺭﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖﻭﺍﻳﻦﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﺶﺧﺪﺷﻪﺑﻪﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﺑﻮﺩ.ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥﺑﺎﺁﻏﺎﺯﺟﻨﮓﺍﻭﻝ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻳﻤﻦﻧﻴﺰﺩﭼﺎﺭﺗﺰﻟﺰﻝﺷﺪ.
ﭘﺲﺑﺮﺍﻱﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖﺑﻪﻋﺼﺮﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭﺑﺎﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ
ﺑﺴﺖ .ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺛﻨﻲﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﺳﺮﺟﺎﻱﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥﺑﻨﺸﺎﻧﻨﺪ.ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪﺁﻧﻬﺎﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪﺑﺎﻳﻚﺗﻴﺮﺩﻭﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﻢ ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻔﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺩﺳﺖﺭﻗﻴﺒﺎﻥﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱﺧﻮﺩﺭﺍﺍﺯﻳﻤﻦﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩﻛﻨﻨﺪ.ﺧﻴﻠﻲﺯﻭﺩﺩﻋﻮﺍﻱ
ﺣﻮﺛﻲ ﻭ ﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﺮﺏ ﻭ ﻋﺠﻢ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪﺗﺎﻳﻤﻦﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥﺣﻴﺎﻁﺧﻠﻮﺕﺁﻧﻬﺎﺑﺎﻗﻲﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﻧﺒﺮﺩﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮگﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎﻛﺸﺘﻪﺷﺪﻭﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ
ژﻧﺮﺍﻝﺟﺎﻱﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮگﺭﺍﮔﺮﻓﺖ.ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻚﺩﺭﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﻫﻢ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻭﺭﺯﻱﻭﻫﻢﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﺭﺍﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﭼﺮﻳﻚ – ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﺎﻟﻚ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺛﻨﻲﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻘﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﮕﺮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ
ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻴﮕﺮﻱ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻦ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻱ ﺻﺪﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻴﮕﺮﻱ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﺑﺮﻭﻥﺭﻓﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﻧﺼــﺮﺍﷲ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻱ ﺻﺪﺭ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺛﻨﻲﻋﺸﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑــﻲ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﭘﺸــﺖﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
39
ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ
ﻓﺮﺍﻓﻜﻨﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ
ﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻯ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺗﻤﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻪﺟﺰﻳﺮﻩ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺗﻤﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﺣﻤﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺳــﺒﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣــﻪ ﻣﻰﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻳﻤﻦ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺳﻠﺴــﻠﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﻮﻯ ﻭ ﺳــﺪﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻋﺒﺎﺳﻰ
ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺩﻣﺸــﻖ ﻭ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﭘﻨﺎﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ
ﻛﻮﻫﺴﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺻﻌﺐﺍﻟﻌﺒﻮﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﻳﺨﺘﻪ
ﺷﺪ .ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭ ﺯﻳﺪﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻰﺑﻦﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ(
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻣﻮﻯ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺧﻼﻓﺖ ﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺯﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺧﻼﻓﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ
ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻋﻠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ
ﻗﺮﻥ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻗﺮﻥ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺸــﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ،
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﭘﻴﺶﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻧــﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮ ﻗﺴﻤﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺵ ﺁﺏ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ
ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ
ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻢﻣﺮﺯ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻧﺠﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻘﺮ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ
ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻗﻪ ﺟﺎﺭﻭﺩﻳﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻴﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﺑﻪﻓﻠﻚ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺻﻌﺐﺍﻟﻌﺒﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻝ 1964ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺼﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺎﻕ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺳﺎﻛﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﮕﻰ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻘﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
40
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ
ﺷــﻴﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 1980ﻗﺮﻥ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻧﺸﻴﻦ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻧﻬﻀﺖ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ
ﺳﻴﺪﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ
ﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺳــﻴﺪﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛــﻲ ،ﻓﺮﺯﻧــﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻌــﺪﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻭ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻳﺤﻴﻰﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻰ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ
ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ
ﺑــﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺷــﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻣﻦ« ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤــﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺭﻧﺠﺶ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺶﺳﻔﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻰ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻃﺮﺩ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻼﻣﻪ
ﻣﺠﺪﺍﻟﺪﻳــﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦﻧﻴﺰﺍﻭﺭﺍﺭﻫﺎﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﻭﻟﻰﺍﻭﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﺒﺎﺏﺍﻟﻤﻮﻣﻦﺭﺍﺭﻫﺎ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻭﺳﻌﻰﻛﺮﺩﺧﻼءﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺩﺭﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪﺭﺍﻛﻪﺍﺯﻫﻤﺎﻥﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺷــﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﭘﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ
ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ:
.1ﺷﻴﻌﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ.
.2ﻧﻘﺪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ.
.3ﺗﺮﻭﻳــﺞ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﻫﻤﭽــﻮﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺭژﻳﻢ
ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ
ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺑــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻭ
ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺷــﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﻴﻌﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺷﺨﺺ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺮﭼﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻓﺮﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﺗﺎﺏ ﻭ
ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮﺍﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﻑ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻟﺬﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻣﺠﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺷﻴﻌﻰ ،ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﻌﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺗﺠﻤﻊ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻮﻩﻫﺎ ﭘﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺫﺧﺎﻳﺮ ﻏﺬﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﺤﺎﺗﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺧﻴﺰﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2004-5ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺑﺎ ﻛﺶ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ
ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﻼﺕ ﻛﺸﺘﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﻣﻨﻜﺮ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﺍﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺸﻮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﻛﺸﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ
ﻛﺸﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ«.
ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺗﺴﻨﻦ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻲ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
25ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﻞ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ،ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺗﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ،ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ،ﺟﻬﺸﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﺭﻩﻳﺎﻓﺘﮕﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺒﻼ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻫﻴﺎﻓﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻳﻚ
ﺭﻫﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﺷﺪ؛ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺣﺴــﻴﻨﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪ ،ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺴﺎﺟﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﻛﻦ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﮔﻔﺘﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻯ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﻰ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺠﻪ ﻧﺮﻡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ ﺩﻫــﻪ ﻧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﻥ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒــﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷــﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷــﺪ ﻃــﺮﺡ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳــﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷــﺪ
ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺎﻟﻢﺍﻟﺒﻴﺾ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺾ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﻔﺮﺳــﺘﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺻﺎﻟﺢ
ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻭﺭ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺳﻜﻮﻧﺖ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺣﺰﺏ
ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻛﻨﮕﺮﻩ ﻣﻠﻰ ،ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2008ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻭﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺳﻪﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺝ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺳﻮءﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ،ﻓﺎﻣﻴﻞﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ،
ﺷــﻮﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺩﺳﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻓﻜﻨﻰ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﺣﻤﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺗﺤﺖﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺳﻌﻰ
ﻛــﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑــﺎﺭ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺣﺮﻑ ﺳــﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺸــﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﻧﺪ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ ﻓﻼﻛﺖ ﺷــﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﺳﺮ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ
ﻭ ﺍﻗﺴﺎﻡ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺷﻬﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ 2004ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻓﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻛﻮﻫﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷﺸﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺒﻪﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﺒﻚﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪ
ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﻤﻨﻰ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻧﻘﺶ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫــﺎﻯ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺑﻮﺳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻳﺎﺽ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﺑﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻋﺮﺑﻰ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺯﻯ ﻧﺠﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻰ ﻧﺠﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ ﻓﻼﻛﺖ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﻫﻢﻛﻴﺸــﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻳﺎﺽ ﺑﺮ ﺻﻨﻌﺎ
ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻟﺸﻜﺮﻛﺸﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻯﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻘﺒﻞ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ
ﻛﺎﻣــﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﮔﺴﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷﺮﻗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺑﻤﺐﺍﻓﻜﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺗﺠﻤﻊ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﻓﺎﺵ ﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺻﻠﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ .ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﻮﻥ
ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻜﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺼﺮ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺼﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺨﺒﻪ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕﻣﺘﺤــﺪﻩ ﻋﺮﺑﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻋﺮﺑﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﭘــﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺸــﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﻧﺸــﻴﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻮﺩﺍﻯ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺮ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ،ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺻﺎﻟــﺢ ﺭﺍ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﭘﻮﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻨﮕﻔﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﺳﻨﺎﺗﻮﺭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺧﻮﺍﻩ،
ﺟﺎﻥ ﻣﻚﻛﻴﻦ ،ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷــﺮﻁ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺎﻙ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺿﺪﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻠﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻪﺟﺰﻳﺮﻩ ﻋﺮﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻟﻴﺒﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻳﻤﻦ،
ﻗﺬﺍﻓﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺴﻮﻳﻪﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻳﺎﺽ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺤﻜﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛــﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘــﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ
ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺳــﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻣﻘﺮﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻠﻚ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ،ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻟﻴﺒﻰ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻠﺘﻤﺴــﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺬﺍﻓﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻠﺢ
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﻓﺸــﺮﺩﻩ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﻭﺣﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻰﮔﺮﻯ
ﻗﻄﺮ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻄﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻃﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ،ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﺸــﺪ .ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺻﻠﺢ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻓﻌﻼ ﺳﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻓﻜﻨﻰ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ
ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻛﻤﻚ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻗﺎﻧﻊﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺪ.
ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﻄﻪﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪﻥ
ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺴــﻠﻴﺤﺎﺗﻰ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ
ﺳــﺨﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻏﻨﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ
ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﭘﺮﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺳــﻼﺡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﺭﻧﺠــﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺮﺹ ﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪ ﻛﻼﺷﻴﻨﻜﻮﻑ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻠﺐ ﺭﻭﻏﻦ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣــﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﻭ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻧــﺶ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ
ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺷــﻴﻌﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ
ﻏﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
41
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﺳﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺼﺎﻑ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻋﺮﺏ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺠﻢ
ﻫﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﺴﺮﻭ ﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ-ﺍﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﻄﺤﻰ
ﺩﻛﺘـﺮ ﺍﺳـﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻤـﺎﺩ ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺘـﻰ ﻳﻤﻨـﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻳـﻚ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛـﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺧـﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﻘﻴـﻖ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷـﻴﻌﻪ
ﺟﻌﻔـﺮﻯ ﺭﻭﻯﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺷـﺎﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦﺣﻮﺛﻰﺍﺳﺖ،ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪﻛﻪﺍﻭﺭﺍﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥﻧﺪﻳﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻭﻳﺪﺋﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺷـﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﻡﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﻛﻠﻰ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺷـﻴﻌﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺍﺛﻨﻰﻋﺸـﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺮﻏﻴﺐ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻢ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ 42ﺳﺎﻝ ﺳﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺷـﻴﻌﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﺷـﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥﺯﻳﺪﻯﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻛﺮﺩﻩﻭﺗـﻼﺵﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪﺗﺎﺁﻥﺭﺍﺑﻪ
ﺁﻏﻮﺵﺳﻠﻔﻰﻫﺎﺑﻴﻨﺪﺍﺯﻧﺪ،ﺩﺭﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰﻛﻪﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦﺣﻮﺛﻰ
ﻭﺟﻨﺒﺶﺍﻭﺩﺭﺳﺖﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯﻳﻤﻦﻋﻤﻞﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻏﻮﺵ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨـﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻋﺮﺑﺴـﺘﺎﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﻳﻚﺷﻴﻌﻪﺯﻳﺪﻯﺍﺳﺖﺍﻣﺎﺩﺷﻤﻨﻰﺩﻳﺮﻳﻨﻪﺍﻯﺑﺎﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﺩﻭ
ﺍﺯﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﻮﻥﻭﺳﻠﻔﻰﻫﺎﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩﺩﺭﺑﺨﺶ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯﺍﺯﺳﺨﻨﺎﻧﺶﺍﺯﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺣﻮﺛﻰﺍﺯﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯﺍﻣﺎﻡﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ(ﻭﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﻋﺎﻃﻔﻰﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎﺑﺎﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯﻭﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ.
ﻣﺘﻦﻛﺎﻣﻞﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯﻣﺎﺑﺎﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﺳﺎﻣﻪﺍﻟﻌﻤﺎﺩﺩﺭﭘﻰﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ.
***
ﭘﺮﺳـﺶ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺛﻨﻰﻋﺸـﺮﻯ؟ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺧـﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻋﺎﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨـﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻋﻴﺪ ﻏﺪﻳﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺸـﻦ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧـﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﺁﻗـﺎﻯ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻰ ﺗﺤـﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺧﻼﻓﺖ ﺭﺍﺷـﺪﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺋﻦ ﻭ ﺷـﻮﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳـﺖ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺍﺛﻨﻰﻋﺸـﺮﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ .ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺑﻔﺮﻣﺎﻳﻴﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳــﻦ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻓﻌﻠــﻰ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻰ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺳﻴﺪﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻢ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ،ﻫﻢ ﺳﻴﺪﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻢ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻬــﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻢ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺑﻰﺍﺛﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ
ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ 28ﺳﺎﻝ ﺳﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻼﻙ ،ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ
ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻓﻌﻠـﻰ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ.
ﻭﻟﻰ ﺧـﺐ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫـﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔـﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨـﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ
ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2004ﻛﺸﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﺍﻯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ،
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻛﻼ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ .ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ
42
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﻣﻦ ،ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 2004ﺣﻤﻠﻪ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺷﺎﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﺸــﻴﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﺧــﻮﺩﻡ ﻧﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻡ
ﻭﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﻡ .ﺍﻭ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺸﻜﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ 40 ،30ﺳﺎﻝ ﺳﺎﻛﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸـﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸـﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ.ﻳﻌﻨﻰﻭﻗﺘﻰﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖﺷﺒﺎﺏﻣﻮﻣﻦﺭﺍﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻯ ﺳـﻨﺘﻰ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ.
ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻯ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺷـﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻮﻣﻦ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﺁﺯﺭﺩﻩﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺷـﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ.
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺷــﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻮﻣــﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺍﻳــﻞ 92 ،1991ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 2004ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ .ﺷــﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻮﻣﻦ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﺸــﻰ ﻣﺠﺪﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﻳﺪﻯ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ
ﻣﺮﺟﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﺪﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﻃﺒﺎﻃﺒﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺳــﻴﺪﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻭ
ﻫﻢ ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺳﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔــﺖ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻣﻦ ﻳﻚ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳﺤﻴﻰ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﻭ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﺨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺑﻮﺑﻜﺮ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳﺤﻴﻰ ﺳــﺎﻟﻢ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ
ﻭ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﺨﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﺍﺑﻮﺑﻜﺮ
ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓــﻞ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺨﻔﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﺷﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺑﻮﺑﻜﺮ ﻭ ...ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﻋﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰ
ﻭ ﺑﻌﺜﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺰﻝ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺨﻔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﻓﺘــﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭽﻜﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻣﺨﻔﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ،4
5ﻧﻔﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺷــﻔﺎﻑ ﻭ ﺻﺮﻳﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭﻻ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻓﻘﻪ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ،ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ
ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﺪﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﻳﺪﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﺋـﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻠﻔﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﺷـﺪﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺑﻮﺑﻜﺮ ،ﻋﻤـﺮ ﻭ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻜـﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺣﺘـﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﻔﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸـﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺷـﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻰﺷـﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴـﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﺵ
ﻣﻰﺭﺳـﺪ .ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺳـﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﻟﺤﺎﻅﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻰﻭﻓﻜﺮﻯﻳﻚﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻛﺎﻣﻼﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰﺑﺎﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ
ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺍﺛﻨﻰﻋﺸﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ
ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻌﻨـﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴـﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴـﻢ ﻛـﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺛﻨﻰﻋﺸـﺮﻯ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴــﻢ .ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ
ﺭﻓﺘــﻢ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺤﻠﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ
ﻭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻫﺴــﺖ ﻛﺘﺐ
ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ
ﻫﻢ ﺗﻌﺠــﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ .ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻼ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﻳﺪﻡ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﮕﻰ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻛﺘﺒﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻢ ﭼﺎپ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫــﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺣﻜﻮﻣــﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﭘـﺲ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻰﻫﺎ ،ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎ؟
ﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ .ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺷــﻴﻌﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻪ ﺩﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ
ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻰ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻠﻔﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺜﻰﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎ
ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑـﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﺟﻨﺒـﺶ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻧـﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ،
ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺣﻨﺒﻠﻰﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺳﻠﻔﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﻮﻥ
ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻌﺘﺪﻝﺗﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻤﭙﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘـﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﺎﻓﻌﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﺷـﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺗﺸـﺎﻥ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨـﺪ .ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻠﻔﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﺷﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻢ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳـﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺗﺤـﺖ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔـﺮ ﺍﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﭘﺲ
ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻰﻫﺎ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧــﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺷــﺎﻓﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳــﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺳﻨﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺷــﺎﻓﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷــﺎﻓﻌﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺳﻠﻔﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻠﻔﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳــﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﻮﻳﺖ
ﻭ ﻗﻄﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻯ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻰ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ
ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰﻫﺎﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺑﻌﺜﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻰﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻧﻪ .ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺘﺎ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻦ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﺤﻮﺛﻰ؟
ﻧﻪ .ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺿﺪ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼـﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒـﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻡ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺘﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺷـﻨﻴﺪﻡ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ
ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ،ﺷـﻴﻌﻪ ﺍﺛﻨﻰﻋﺸﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺷـﻴﻌﻪ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﭼــﺮﺍ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺸــﻴﻊ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻭ ﭼﻪ
ﺗﺸــﻴﻊ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻋﻠﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ،
ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻳﺪ ،ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﺳﺎﺯﻡ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﺸــﻴﺪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻨــﻰ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺎﻡ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﻛﺸﻨﺪ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﺵ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺸــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻧﺸــﻮﻧﺪ .ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺸــﻴﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺸــﻴﻊ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬــﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﺸــﻴﻊ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸـﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸـﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﺑﻮﻣﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺩﻫﻪ
60ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ ﻓﻼﻛﺖ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺷـﻤﺎﻝ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮﻯ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺩﺭﺱ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﺁﺷﻨﺎ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻰﺁﻳﻨـﺪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺴـﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫـﺎ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨـﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺶﺳـﻔﻴﺪﺍﻥ
ﺯﻳﺪﻳـﻪ ،ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒـﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺣﺘـﻰ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺘﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ
ﻣﺠﺪﺍﻟﺪﻳـﻦ ﻣﻮﻳﺪﻯ ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻔﻜـﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺑﻮﺑﻜـﺮ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﻰ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﻣﻰﺗـﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ
ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤــﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﻣﻰﺗﺮﺳﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻛﺸــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪﻩ
ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺜﻼ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺻﻨﻌﺎ ،ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﻮﺑﻜﺮ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮ
ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ .ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻫﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺑﺸــﻨﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻳﻚ
ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺳﻨﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ.
ﺍﺻﻼ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻴﺪ .ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ
ﺳﻨﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺷــﻴﻌﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ ،ﻣﻦ ﺳﻨﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻢ .ﺯﻳﺪ ﺍﺑﻦﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﻚ
ﺳﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻴﺦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ؟ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻧﻪ! ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺳﻨﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻗﺸﻨﮓ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ
ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺣﻘﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺑﻴﺖ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺑﻴﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﭼﻪ؟ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ .ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ .ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ
43
ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ .ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ .ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺠﻒ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﻮﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻏﻮﺵ ﺳــﻠﻔﻴﺖ
ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ.
ﻭﻟﻰ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺗﺴﻨﻦ .ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﺍﻥ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻳﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭﻻ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﻮﺑﻜﺮ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ -ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﻳﺪﺋﻮﻳﻰ -ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ
ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺯﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺯﻳﻦﺍﻟﻌﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ)ﻉ( ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺯﻳﻦﺍﻟﻌﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ)ﻉ( ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ)ﻉ( ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ
ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ( ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺧﻠﻴﻔﻪ ﺣﺴﻦﻇﻦ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺣﺴﻦ ﻇﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﻦ
ﻇﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺧﺘﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ
ﻭ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﻭ ﻣﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﻭ ...ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ .ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺑﻮﺑﻜﺮ ﻭ ...ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ( ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﺑﻮﺵ ﺑﻴﻌﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ
ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫـﺎ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫـﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ،ﻣﻦ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﺮﺳﺪ؟
ﺍﻭﻻ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺧــﻮﺏ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻧــﺪﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺎﻡ ﺯﻳﺪﻳﻪ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﺸﺖ
ﺳﺮ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﻳﻚ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎﭘﺸــﺖ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺧــﻮﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻰﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺮﺱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺘﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﺻﻌﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻏﻮﺵ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻏﻮﺵ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻳﻪ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻧﺪ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺧﻨﺜﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﻧﻘﺶ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ
ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻯ
ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻋﻮﺍﻡ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ
ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﭘﺸـﺘﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ
ﭼﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭﻻ
ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ
ﻳﻚ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥﻫﻢ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﺴــﻨﺪ ﺯﻳﺪ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﭘﺴﺮ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺯﻳﻦﺍﻟﻌﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ)ﻉ( ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻧﻬﺞﺍﻟﺒﻼﻏﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺍﻭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ .ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻣﺪﺭﺳــﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻒﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ
44
ﻳﻚ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺣﻮﺛﻲﻫﺎ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﻳﻚ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺮﺱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ
ﺳﻌﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺘﺎ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ .ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ.
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻋﻮﺍﻡ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ! ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ
ﻣﻦ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻡ .ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻡ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﻯ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻳﺪﻳﺖ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ)ﻉ( ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺯﻳﺪ ﻋﻤﻮﻯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ)ﻉ(
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺯﻳﻦﺍﻟﻌﺎﺑﺪﻳﻦ)ﻉ( ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻗﺮ)ﻉ(
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﺎﻗــﺮ)ﻉ( ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ)ﻉ( ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ،
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻰ ،ﺟﺎﻳـﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﺍﻳﺶ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﺎﻝ 1962ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻐﺮﻧﺞ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ ﻓﻼﻛﺖ ﺷـﺪﻳﺪ ﺷـﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﺑﺎﻋﺪﻡﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﮕﻰﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳـﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺯﻳﺪﻯ
ﻧﻤﻰﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﺪ ﺗﺸﻴﻊ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺣﺮﻑ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫـﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ
ﺗﺸـﻴﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺷـﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﻦ ﺳـﻮﺍﻟﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻧﺸـﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺑﺨﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷـﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﻳﺪﻯﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻨﺪ،
ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺳﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ؟
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺳﻨﻰ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻯ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺍﻳﺠـﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻣـﺮﺩﻡ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍﻳﮕﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴـﻴﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ؟
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺳﻨﻰ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻰ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ
ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺷــﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻨﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﻣﺮﺁﻥ ﺗﺘﻜﻠﻢ« ،ﻣﺮﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻫﺎﺕ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻡ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺯﺍﺣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺯﺍﺣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺁﻥ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻬﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻣﺮﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﺳﻴﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻟﺒﺎﺱﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧــﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺍﺛﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﻳﻤﻨﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻗﺒﻼ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﻤﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ .ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺝ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ30 0ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺭﻳﺎﻝ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺑــﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ 30ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺭﻳﺎﻝ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﺮﻕ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺁﺏ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍ ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻣﺮﺁﻥ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻼﺵ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺮﺁﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺪﻳﺤﻴﻰ؟
ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺘﺎ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻌﺪﺍ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷــﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻤﻰﺭﻭﻡ ،ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍ ﺟﺎﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﻳﺤﻴﻰ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﻳﺤﻴﻰ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﺍ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ
ﺍﺛﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻣﺮﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻳــﻚ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮ ﻓﺮﺳــﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻳﻚ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﭘﺮﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻢ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﻓﻌﻪ ﻗﻮﻯ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ
ﻛــﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ 200ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ 85ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻰﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻢ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﻮﻥ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﻤﻠــﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ 85ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ.
ﺑﺤـﺚ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺩﻫﻪ 90ﺷـﻤﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ
ﻭ ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﮕﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ
ﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺗﺎ
ﭼﻪ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺠﺎﺳﺖ؟
ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ﻣﻰﺯﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻢ ﺳﻴﺪﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ
ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻴﺪﻳﺤﻴﻲ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ
ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺟﺰﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ .ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺟﺎﺳﺖ .ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﭼﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ
ﻣﺴﻠﺢﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻭ ﺣﺠﻪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ
ﺍﺯ ﺧــﻮﺩﻡ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ .ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺘﺎ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟــﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻘﻰ ﺑﻴــﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳــﻮﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷﺪ.
ﻭﻟﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺩﻭﺣﻪ ﺷﻜﺴـﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﻫﻢ ﺑـﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ .ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﻧﺸﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﺳـﻠﺤﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷـﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥﺭﺍﺑﻪﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ.ﻫﺮﺟﻨﺒﺸﻰ
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﭘﺎﺭﭼﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢﻭﻗﺘﻰﻛﻪﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎﺣﺎﺿﺮﻧﻤﻰﺷﺪﻧﺪﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﺟﻬﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺨﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺖ.
ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﺍﻭﻻ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺣﻜﻮﻣــﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳــﻼﺡ ﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺳﻼﺡ
ﺍﺧﻮﺍﻥﺍﻟﻤﺴﻠﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ 100ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ 90 .ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ.
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺧﻴﻠـﻰ ﻣﻬﻤـﻰ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﭼـﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﻰ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨـﺪ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﺭﻧﺠﻚ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺮﺹ ﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ ﻓﻼﻛﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ
ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺬﺍﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺟﺰﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺟﺎﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﭼﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻭ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﻰ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔـﺮ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪ.
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﻣﻰﺁﻳﻨــﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻼﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻰﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺎﺕ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻳﺪ ،ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ
ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻴﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻫﺴـﺘﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ،ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺗﺸـﻜﻴﻞ
ﺩﻫﻴﺪ.
ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺳﻼﺡ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﺳــﻼﺡ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ
ﻣﻰﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ؟
ﺍﺯ 40ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ
ﺳــﻼﺡ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺳﻼﺡ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺳﻼﺡ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ؟ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ
ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻮﺑﻮﺱ
ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺣﺘﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻓﺘﻮﺍ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻳﻤﻨﻰ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻳﻤﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﺸﻴﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺷـﻴﻮﻩ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺗﻰ ﺳﻠﻔﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ
ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﻳﺤﻴﻰ
ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺳـﻌﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳـﺐ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴﺘﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺒـﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻢ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﺗﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﻴﺴـﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﺨﻦ
ﺳـﻴﺪﻳﺤﻴﻰ ﻣﻰﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪ ﭼﻴﺴـﺖ؟ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺴـﺘﺮﺵ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ
60ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺷـﺪ ،ﺍﻳﺴـﺘﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻴـﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ
ﭼﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻴﺪﻳﺤﻴﻰ ﺗﻼﺵ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺧﻄﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻠﺤﺪﻳﻦ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﻳﺤﻴﻰ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻳﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﺸــﻢ ﺁﺩﻡﺭﺑﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺳﻌﻰ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺳـﻴﺪﻳﺤﻴﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ ،ﻣﺎ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﻭ ﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ
ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺳﻴﺪﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻣﭙﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺑﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﺯ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ
ﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ .ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺸﻴﻢ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﺪﻧﻰ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻴﻢ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺷـﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺣﻤﺎﺱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄـﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﺱ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺷـﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺳﻮء ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ.
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ .ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺁﻧﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ »ﺍﻥﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﻔﺮﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ «...ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺁﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻋﻴﺴﻰ)ﻉ( ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﻟﻌﻨﺖ ﻣﻰﻓﺮﺳﺘﺪ.
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻣﻮﺳــﻰ)ﻉ( ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺣﻀــﺮﺕ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ)ﻉ( ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻭ
ﺳــﻌﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﻣﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ
ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ
45
ﭘﺲ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﻪ! ﻣﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ
ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﮔﻔﺖ.
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺶ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺻﻒﺁﺭﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻣـﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻌﻮﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻟﻴﺒﻰ ،ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺘـﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ ﻭ
ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻢ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻣﺜﻼ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺑﺴـﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻜﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﻭﻗﺘـﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟـﺢ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ 100ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑـﻪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻛﻤـﻚ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺤـﻮﻯ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﻋﺮﺑﺴـﺘﺎﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺘﺮﺳـﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻠﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺷـﺎﻋﻪ
ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺷـﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺸـﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺋﻦ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻰﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﻴـﺮﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺘﻮﻥ،
ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺷﺎﻓﻌﻰ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﻣﻰﺷـﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ
ﺳـﻌﺪﻩ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻮﻥ ﻭﻫﺎﺑـﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺠـﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻜﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ،
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻴﺪﺍﺣﻤﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﮔﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩﻳﻢ .ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﺁﻝﺳﻌﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ
ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ﺳــﻠﻔﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺳﻠﻔﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻌﺪﻩ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟ ﺧﻄﺒﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﻰ ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ
ﻋﻤﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ( ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻧﻔﺮ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ)ﻉ( ﺭﺍ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺳــﻮﻝ ﺍﻛﺮﻡ)ﺹ( ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﻣﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ
ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﭘﺮﺳﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻄﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻃﻌﻨﻪ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻃﻌﻨﻪ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﻛﺮﻡ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺟﺪ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺟﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻴﺮﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺣﺬﻑ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﻮﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲﺻﺎﻟﺢ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲﺻﺎﻟﺢ
ﺯﺭﻧﮕﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻴﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﻡ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺍﻻﻥ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺭﻫﺒــﺮﺍﻥ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻳﻤﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻯ ﺷــﻜﻨﺠﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻭﻫﺎﺑﻰﻫﺎ ﺷﻜﻨﺠﻪ
ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺻﺪﺍﻯ ﺷﻜﻨﺠﻪﻫﺎﻯ
46
ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺷــﻨﻮﻳﻢ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﻗﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺸــﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ،
ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺟﻨﮕﻴﻢ ،ﭼﻨﺪ
ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻧﺪ ،ﻛﺴﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻨﺠﻪ
ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺧﻮﺑــﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺟﻨﮕﻴﻢ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ
ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻰ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﺠﺎﻳﻊ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺶ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ؛
ﻳﻜﻰ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ.
ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫـﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻴﮕﺮﻯ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻴﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ
ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺪﺯﻫﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﺍ ﺑــﺎ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺧــﻮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﻡ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ .ﺑﺤﺚ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ
ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻰ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟
ﻛﻼ ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒــﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧــﺪ .ﻣﺮﺍﺟــﻊ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤــﺎﻯ ﺷــﻴﻌﻪ ﻭ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻫﻴﭻﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎﻥ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ
ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﻰ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻻﻥ
ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﺠﺎﻳﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺶ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ
ﺻﺎﻟﺢ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻰ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﭘﺪﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭﺳـﻴﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺷـﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ،ﻭﻟﻰﺧﺐﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻴﮕﺮﻯﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥﺩﺭﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻳﻤﻦﺗﺎ
ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻯ ﺗﻌﺠﺐﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ
ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻛﻼ
ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﻯ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ.
ﻭﻟـﻰ ﻣـﻦ ﺷـﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻡ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫـﺎ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﻘﺘـﺪﻯ ﺻـﺪﺭ ﻭ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲﺳﻴﺴﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺿﺪﻳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ
ﻫﻢ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺿﺪﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﺎﻧﻰ،
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴـﻦ ﻧﺼـﺮﺍﷲ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﻯ ﺻﺪﺭ ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴـﻚ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫـﺎ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻳـﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ؟
ﻣــﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﻘــﺪﻡ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻦ ﻧﺼــﺮﺍﷲ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻳﻚ ﺷــﻴﻌﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻤـﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺒـﺎﻁ ﻋﺎﻃﻔﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴـﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴـﻦ ﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲ ﻭ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻱﻭﻧﻈﺎﻡﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﻭﺟﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﺩﻣﻴﺎﻥﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻭ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ
ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺑﻪﭘﺎﻱ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺖ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﻴﺪ
ﻧــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠــﻚ .ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻣﺤﺘﺎﻃﺎﻧــﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﺪ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭﺍﻻ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳــﻴﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻯ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺎ
ﻛﺘﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛــﻰ .ﻳﻚ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﻛﺎﻣــﻞ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ(
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻦﻧﺼﺮﺍﷲﺑﺎﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯﺍﺳﺖ.ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁﺣﺴﻴﻦﺣﻮﺛﻰﺑﺎ
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻦ ﻧﺼــﺮﺍﷲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ
ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ
ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻠﻨﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﻳﻚ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﺠﻮﺱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺣﻮﺛﻰ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻦ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ؟
ﻧﻪﻓﻜﺮﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻢ.ﺑﻌﻴﺪﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻢ.ﺍﻭﻓﻘﻂﻳﻚﺳﺎﻝﻭﻧﻴﻢﺩﺭﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺷـﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺿـﺎﻉ ﺑﻐﺮﻧﺠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻌﺪﻩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﺸـﻢ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻙ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﻧﻪ .ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻢ .ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﻤﻦ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻤﻠﻚ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻮﺛﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 54ﺳﺎﻝ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺪﻭﻥﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺳﻔﺮ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺷﺎﻳﻌﺎﺗﻲ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺘﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﻗﻢ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ
ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻳﻦﻛﺎﺭﺕ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯ
ﺩﻫﻪ 40ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﺩﺳــﺖ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻯ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺩﻫــﻪ 60ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺭﻭﺯﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺮﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﺟﻮﻳﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻯ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥﺳــﻮﻯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺮ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺼــﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ
»ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﭘﻤﭗ ﺑﻨﺰﻳﻦ« ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﻝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 40ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ
ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ »ﭘﻤﭗ ﺑﻨﺰﻳﻨﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﻳﻨﮕﻪﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻫﻪ 40ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷــﻰ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﻧﺸــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺼﻪ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ
ﺑــﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻮﻟﻪﺑﺎﺭ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺏ
ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮﺕ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺳﭙﺮﻯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺼﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺎﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ
»ﭘﻤﭗ ﺑﻨﺰﻳﻦ« ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻯ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺼﻪ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷﻰ
ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
48
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻨﮕﻪﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﺬﺍﺏﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﭘﻴﺰﻭﺩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ
ﻣــﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻧﺨﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻣﻞ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻇﺮﻳﻒ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻰ
ﺳــﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﺗﻠﻔﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑــﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ .ﺭﺍﻳﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥﺳــﻮﻯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﻛﻤﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻣﺮﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻖ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﺭﺯ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠــﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﻡ ﺧﻂ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﻓﺎﺵ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ
ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ
ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﺒﻮﻉ ﺭﺍﻳﺲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻇﺮﻳﻒ،
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴــﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻇﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺧــﺎﻙ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻔﺮﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ »ﮔﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ« ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺸﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻨﮕﻪﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﻝ 1362ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﻗﻢ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺣﻮﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺴﻮﻯ
ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨــﺖ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﻣﻄﻬــﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ
ﻛﻼﺱﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛــﺮﺩ .ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﺻﺪﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎ ﻣﻰﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻗﻢ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ
ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻮﺳﺴــﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺳــﺮﻓﺼﻞ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﺷــﺪ .ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﺳــﺎﻝ 1384ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺸﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻮﻯ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺭﻓﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ
ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﻯ ﺩﺷــﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ
ﻣﻠﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻛﻮچ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴــﻲ ﻓﺎﻳﻨﻨﺸــﺎﻝ ﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪ
ﻏﺮﺑــﻰ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺸــﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻰ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ» :ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻳﻚ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻻﺑﻰ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ
ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﻓﺸــﺎﻯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺧﺒــﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻋﻠﻰ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺳﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ
ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧــﻲ ﻭﻳﺰﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻔﺮ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺟﻮﺍﺩ ﻇﺮﻳﻒ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻣﻠﻞ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ«.
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺧﺎﺭﺟــﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺳــﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ
ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺪﺍﻝﻫــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ ﻧﻮﺷــﺖ:
» ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﮔﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ «.ﺍﻧﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﮔﺮﻳﻦﻛﺎﺭﺕ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻔﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻣﺠﻤﻊﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺍﺧﺬ ﻭﻳﺰﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠــﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ »ﮔﺮﻳــﻦﻛﺎﺭﺕ« ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻤﻰ ﺁﻥﺳﻮﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻭﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ
ﻧﻘﺾﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﻐﻮ ﮔﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﻚﻛﻮﺭﻣﻚ ،ﺳــﺨﻨﮕﻮﻱ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻙ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﺱ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ
ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻮﺟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﺍﻻﺕ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻗﺪﺭﻯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺭﺍﻳــﺲ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ» :ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺍﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺍﻗﺎﻣــﺖ ﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺭﺍﻳﺲ
ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ.
ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺍﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ
ﺗﺪﺍﺑﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ «.ﺭﺍﻳﺲ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﺣﻮﺍﺷــﻰ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻭﺝ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻔﺮ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ .ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺷﺮﻕ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻰ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ» :ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺗﺎ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻻﺭﻳﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺳﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺶ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ«.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﻜﺮﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻯ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻰ
»ﮔﺮﻳــﻦﻛﺎﺭﺕ« ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧــﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷــﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻗﺼﻪ »ﮔﺮﻳﻦﻛﺎﺭﺕ« ﺍﻭ ﺳﺮﺯﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ.
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻻﺕ
ﺷــﺨﺼﻰ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻴﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻯ ﻗﺎﻃﻊﺗﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﻴﻪﺍﻯ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻫــﻢ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﻤﻰ ﭘﻴﺶﺗﺮ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻔﻠﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻫﻤﺘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺑﮕﺸﺎﻳﺪ.
ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻤﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻧﮕﺎﺭﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺳﻴﻪﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻰﻧﻮﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻛﻪ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﻟﻰﺗﺮ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ .ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻧﮕﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﻬﺮ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ
ﺁﻥ ﺯﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﻯ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚﺳﺮ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ »ﮔﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺕ« ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﺎﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﺑــﺮﺍﺯ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻫــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺧــﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺳــﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻳﻨﮕﻪﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺳــﺎﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪﻳﺎﻥ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨــﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗــﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑــﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨــﺪ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻫــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺳــﻮﺩﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﮔﺎﻭﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻃﻰ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩﺍﻯ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﻻ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ
ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺧﺸﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺮﺯﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ،ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺷﺎﻫﺮﺍﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺗﻴﺮﮔﻰ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﺩ.
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮ
ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ.
49
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺵ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﻓﺮﺵ ﻧﻔﻴﺲ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺴـﻮﻯ
ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪﺗﺎﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﻧﺪ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ
ﻣﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫـﺮﮔﺎﻩ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻟﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﻧﺦ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ
ﻣﻬﺠﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷـﺪ ﻭ ﻣـﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻙ ﺗﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳـﻤﻲ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺵ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺴـﻮﻯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷـﺪﺕ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﻯ
ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﭘﻴﺸﻪﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻓﺮﺟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔـﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠـﺚ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨـﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ
ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻃﻰ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﺎﻩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﺳـﺨﺖ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
***
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺪﺕ
ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ
ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻃﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ 134/9ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺩﺳﺘﺒﺎﻑ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ 134/6ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺯﻥ 20ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
50
ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻭﺯﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ؟ﻣﮕﺮﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﻭﺯﻥﻭﺍﺭﺯﺵﺭﺍﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻓﺮﺵﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﻴﺲ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﺒﻬﺎ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭘﺮﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻥ ﻛﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ؟
ﻓﺮﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺳــﺘﺒﺎﻑ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ
ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻳﻜﻪﺗﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻨــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺳﺮﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻗﺒــﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺤﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥﺗﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ
ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻓﺮﺵ
ﺩﺳﺘﺒﺎﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﭘﺲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺟﺎﻳــﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻃﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺎﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻋــﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﻫﺪﻓﻰ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻓﺮﺵ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺑﺮﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻬﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﺵ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻓﻰ
ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺣﺘﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻓﺮﺵ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳـﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫـﺪ ،ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗـﻮﺍﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩ؟
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗــﺎ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴــﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻒﭘﻮﺵﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻓﺮﺵ ﻛﺎﻻﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﻯ
ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺵﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﺵ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ،
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺵﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺵﻫﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺟﻮﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ.
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺳﻮﺩﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺟﺴــﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻓﺮﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﮔﻤﺮﻙ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﺮﺵ ﭼﻴﻨﻰ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻨﺪﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺎﻧﺘﺮﻯ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺩﺳﺘﺒﺎﻑ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺵﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻨﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻰ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﭘﻴﻜﺮ ﭘﺎپ ژﺍﻥ ﭘﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺑﻮﺗﻰ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻓﺮﺷﻰ ﭼﺸﻢﻧﻮﺍﺯﺗﺮ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺖﺗﺎﻧﺎﻡﺻﻨﻌﺖﻭﻫﻨﺮﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﺑﻪﻳﺎﺩﻫﺎﺁﻣﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﺪﻭﺍﻳﺎﻣﻰﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻳﻮﺭﮔﻦﻛﻠﻴﻨﺰﻣﻦ ،ﮔﻠﺰﻥﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻰﻫﺪﻳﻪﺍﻯﺍﺯﻋﻠﻰﺩﺍﻳﻰ،ﻛﺎﭘﻴﺘﺎﻥﻭﻗﺖ
ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﺵ ،ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻭ
ﻭﺭﺯﺷــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﻩ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﺩﺍﺭﺗﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺗﻔــﺎﻕ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﺎﻟﻴﻔﺮﻧﻴﺎ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻠﻨﺪﺁﻭﺍﺯﻩﻛﺮﺩﻛﻪﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰﺍﺯﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯﻧﺎﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯﺍﻭﺍﻓﺸﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻣﻨﺰﻝﺁﻗﺎﻯﺭﺋﻴﺲﺯﻳﺮﮔﺮﺩﺵﻣﺪﺍﻡﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎﻯﻋﻜﺎﺳﻰﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳــﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺳــﺮﻧﺦﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﺱﺑﺰﺭگﺭﺍﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥﺩﺭﻣﻨﺰﻝﺁﻗﺎﻯﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮﻛﺮﺩ،ﻭﻟﻰ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻫﺎﻳﻰﻛﻪﺩﺭﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰﻧﻘﺶﺑﺴﺖﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻚﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؛ﻓﺮﺵﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﺩﺭﺍﺗﺎﻕﻫﺎﻯﺍﻋﻴﺎﻧﻰﺑﺎﺗﺰﺋﻴﻦﻣﺪﺭﻥﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﺳﺎﻋﺖﻫﺎﻋﻜﺎﺳﻰﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﮔﺮﺍﻥﺑﻮﺩ.ﻓﺮﺵﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﭼﻨﻴﻦﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻯﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﺷﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩﻭﻟﻰﻗﺪﺭﻯﺩﻭﺭﺗﺮﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥﺷﻬﻴﺮﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻴﺲﻛﺎﭘﻮﻻﻧﻘﺶﻓﺮﺵﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﺭﺍﺩﺭﻧﻤﺎﻳﻰﺍﺯﻳﻜﻰﺍﺯﺁﺛﺎﺭﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ
ﺧﻮﺩﺛﺒﺖﻛﺮﺩﻩﺑﻮﺩ.ﺍﻭﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻯﺩﻳﻨﻰﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰﺭﺍﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻛﻪﺷﻜﻮﻩﺳﻜﻮﻧﺖﮔﺎﻩﺳﺮﺩﺳﺘﻪﻣﺨﻔﻴﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥﺭﺍﺑﺎﻓﺮﺵﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﺥ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ .ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺷﻬﺮﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭﻟﻰﺷﺎﻳﺪﻛﻠﻴﺪﺷﻬﺮﺕﺭﺍﺑﻴﻞﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻮﻥﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰﺯﺩﻛﻪﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ
ﻓﺮﺵﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﺑﻪﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩﺭﺍﻧﺎﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﮕﺎﺷﺖ.
ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﻴﻞ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘــﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻓــﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ،
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﻜﻮﺑﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺪﮔﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﭘﻴﺸﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﭼــﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥﺳﻮﻯ
ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﺳﺮﻭﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﺷﻜﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﻻﻯ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺻﺪﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔــﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻓﺮﺵ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥﺳــﻮﻯ ﺍﻗﻴﺎﻧﻮﺱﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻻﺑﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺷــﻨﺎﺱ
ﻭ ﭘﺮﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺩﻳﺎﺭ ﻳﻨﮕﻪﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻧﺪﻙ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻰﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺳــﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻯ ﻓﺎﺵﮔﻮﻳﻰ
ﭘﻴﺸــﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ .ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﻘﻞ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺩﺳــﺘﺒﺎﻑ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭﻟﺨﺮﺝﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻟﻘﺐ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻮﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﻮﺭﺝ ﺑﻮﺵ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ﻭﻋﺪﻩ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺳﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻀــﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠــﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺷــﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺗــﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺑــﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﭘﻴﺸــﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﺍﻯ
ﺳﺨﺖ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻓﺮﺵ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺟﺬﺍﺏﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻓﺮﺵ
ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺳﻨﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻣﻰﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﺼﻤﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻻﺑﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ
ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻥ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺩﻏﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺳﻨﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺳــﺮﮔﺮﻡ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﻓﺮﺵ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛــﺮﺩ ،ﺗﻜﺎﭘﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﻓــﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻮﺷﻨﮓ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺒﻚ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺖﻭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳﻨﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰﻓﺮﺵﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﺍﺯﺗﻠﻪﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻛﺮﺩﻩﻭﺍﻧﺪﻙﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖﻭﻟﻰﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥﺭﺍﻩﺭﺍﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪﺩﺍﺩﻩﺗﺎﻓﺘﺤﻰﺑﺰﺭگﺑﺮﺍﻯﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﻧﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺎﺵ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ .ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻔﺲ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺷــﺖ؛ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻨﺎﺗﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻒ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻋﺖﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺸﺖﺧﻂ ﺗﻠﻔﻦ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺳﻨﺎﺗﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪ ،ﺭﻧﮓ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺧﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺧﻂ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻯ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﺒﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺪﺗﻰ
ﺳﺨﺖ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﻋﺎﻟﻰﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻧﺪﺭﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﺩﻣﺎﻧﻰ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻟﻐﻮ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺩﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻟﻐﻮ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ
ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻬﻦ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺰﻝ ﻟﻮﻛﺲ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﻨﺎﺗﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺳﺎﻛﻦ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ.
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻨﺎﺗﻮﺭﻯ ﻫﺪﻳﻪ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
51
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ :
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻤﻲ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ
ﺩﺭﻣﻴﺎﻥﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﺣﺘﻢﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭﻙ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺴـﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻲ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳـﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺩﻫﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺩﺳـﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻲ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺳﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
***
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷـﻜﻞ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﺭﻭﺍﺑــﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ
ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﻳﮕﺎﻥ،
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻮﻥ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺒﻖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻭﻗــﺖ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻏﺬﺍﻳﻲ ،ﻓﺮﺵ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺩﺳﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺠﻢ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺑﺎﻧﻜﻲ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﺎﻻﻳﻲ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ.
ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ
ﺁﻥ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﻻ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻏﺬﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﺮﻣﺎ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻤﺶ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺩﺳﺘﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻪ ﻗﻠﻢ ﻛﺎﻻ ﺑﺮﻧﺞ ،ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺳــﻮﻳﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺭﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻭ ﻟﺠﺴﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﻛﻴــﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﭘﻮﻝ،
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﺠﻢ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 2008ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 500ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱﺑﺎﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢﻛﻪﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎﺷﺎﻣﻞﺧﺮﻳﺪﺑﺮﻧﺞ،ﺳﻮﻳﺎ
ﻭ ﻣﻐﺰ ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺧﺮﻣﺎ ،ﻛﺸــﻤﺶ ،ﺯﻋﻔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭﻗﺘــﻲ ﻛﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﭘــﻮﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺩﺑﻲ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢﻭﻭﻗﺘﻲﻫﻢﻛﺎﻻﻳﻲﺭﺍﻣﻲﻓﺮﻭﺷﻴﻢﺍﺯﻃﺮﻳﻖﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ،
ﺩﺑﻲﻭﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪﺗﻼﺵﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢﻛﻪﭘﻮﻝﺁﻥﺭﺍﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖﻛﻨﻴﻢﻛﻪﺍﻳﻦﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲﺭﺍﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩﻛﺮﺩﻩﻭﺭﻭﻧﻘﻲﻛﻪﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ
ﺩﺭﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱﺑﻴﻦﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻭﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺩﻳﺪﻩﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿـﺮ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ
52
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻏﺬﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﺩﺳﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺞ
ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻛﺸــﺶ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﻘﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻛﻤﻲﻫﻢ ﻣﻐﺰ ﺑﺎﺩﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻳﺎ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﻨﺎﺩﺭ ﺩﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﻓﺮﺵ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻫﺎﻣﺒﻮﺭگ ،ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﻭ
ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻨﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻨﺎﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺭﻧــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﻭﻧﻘﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻘﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ
ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻛﻢﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ
ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻲ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ،ﻣﻜﺰﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻪ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ -ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ -ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ – ﻣﻜﺰﻳﻚ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻮﻓﻖﺗﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻻﻥ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﺒﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﻲ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺗﺸـﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ -ﺁﻣﺮﻳـﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻠﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻭﻗﻔﻪ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﺧﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳــﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺴﭙﺎﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴــﻢ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟــﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﻐﻴﻴــﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﻨﺪﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳـﻖ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷـﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ
ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﺑﺮﺍﻱﻓﺮﻭﺵﻏﻴﺮﺳﻨﺘﻲﺳﻌﻲﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﺍﻳﻦﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﺭﺍ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻛﻪﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥﻧﻴﺰﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲﺭﻭﻱﺩﻭﻟﺖﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻳﻨــﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻲﻣﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ
ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻄﻤﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺭﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺳــﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﺍﺯﺩ .ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ
ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺳﻔﺮ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺑﻪﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺳﻔﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻣﻠﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﻌﻼ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺻﺒﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ.
ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﻧﻔﻊ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲ _ ﻋﻀﻮﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻧﻔﺖﻭﮔﺎﺯ ،ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺷــﺪ ﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ.
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺎﺯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﺳــﺖﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒــﺎﻁ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑــﺎ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻻ
ﻛﺎﻻﻫــﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﻭ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻛﺘﻔﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺘﻮﻥ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺸــﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻏﻼﺕ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻓﺮﺵ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺎﻧﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺨﺘﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺷﺮﻁ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﺮﻭ ﺭﻳﺰﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻱ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩ -ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩ
ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﻲ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﻨﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﻜﺎﻫﻨﺪ .ﻃﺒﻌﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ،ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻔﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ
ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ،
ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎ،
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺘﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ،
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻱ ﺍﻗﻼﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﺍﻗﻼﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﻭﺷﻴﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻋﺰﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺷــﻜﺎﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻣﻌﺠﺰﻩ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﺻﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺸﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎﺩﺍﻣﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺸﻪ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﻬﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻘﺸﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺷــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬــﺎ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﺘﻴﺠــﻪﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﻣﺒــﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑــﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗﻲ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﻣﺎ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻫﺮ
ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
53
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ؟
ﺳﺮﺍﺏ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ
ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺣــﺪﻭﺩ 19ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺁﻥ ،ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ
ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 70ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﭘﻮﺷــﺶ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬــﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 24ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤــﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ
ﻧــﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ 20ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻏﻴﺮﻓﻌﺎﻝ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺧﺒﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ 20ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺻﺤﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺘﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 2/5ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ
ﺩﻻﺭ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﺒﺮ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ
ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﺎﭘﻮﻱ ﺳﺨﺖ
ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻭﺗﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺑﻬﺒﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻳﻴــﺪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ 20ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺿﺎ ﺟﻌﻔﺮﺯﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺳﺨﻨﮕﻮﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ 20ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ
ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻲ ﺩﺭ
54
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻱ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰﺋﻴــﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻋﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﻳﺎ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻲ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ
ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻓــﺮﻭﺵ 20ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻻﺑﻪﻻﻱ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﮔﻢ ﺷــﺪ .ﺧﺒﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎ
ﮔﻢ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﻜﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ 15ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻠﺨﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻔﺖ
ﻓﺮﻭﻧــﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ MDﻭ ﻫﺸــﺖ ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﺎ ﺑﻪﺯﻭﺩﻱ 15ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ «.ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺭﺍﻩﻭﺗﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﻭﺗﺮﺍﺑﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ،
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤــﺎﻯ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻳــﻚ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻴــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ
ﻭﺭﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺁﻧﻮﻗﺖ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ
ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
70ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧــﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ
ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ 2008ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ 20ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 407ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ
12ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 210ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﭘﻮﺷــﺶ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺑﻬﺒﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﻲ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻘﻮﻁ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺷــﺮﻗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻓﻮﻛﺮ ﺳــﻔﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻮﻛﺮ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺁﻥﺩﺭﻫﻠﻨــﺪﻗــﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑــﺮ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳــﻰ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ» :ﺷﺮﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻰ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺭﺍ ﺳﭙﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ
ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﺫﻯﺭﺑﻂ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻟﺬﺍ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎﺩﺍﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻰ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ «.ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻗﻰ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻏﻠﻄﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻰ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﺩﺭﺳﺘﻰ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﻚ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻧﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺭﺑﻄﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺮﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻳﺮﺗﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ» :ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﻧﺢ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ
ﻏﺮﺑــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﻘﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺷــﺮﻗﻰ
ﺍﺳــﺖ «.ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻰ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺷــﺮﻗﻰ ﺁﺳﺎﻥﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤــﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺷــﻮﺩ «.ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻰ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺷــﺮﻗﻰ ،ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺳﻮﺧﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﺮﻭﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤــﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺑﺮﻭﻳــﻢ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻗﺎﺑــﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ «.ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺗﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤــﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﮔﻔــﺖ» :ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ«.
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻰ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻰ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ
ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺖ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ» :ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻠﻜﻰ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ
ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﻭﻯ ﺗﺼﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺑﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ 15ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻳﻢ«.
ﺍﻳﻠﺨﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ
ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ:
»ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻃﻮﻻﻧــﻰ ﻭ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻧﻌﻘﺎﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﺸﺪ «.ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻫﻤﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﻋﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻗﻰ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻰ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ«.
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻲ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻓﺎﻛﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻫﻮﺍﻧﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﺁﻥ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻣﺪﻳﺮﻩ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱﻫــﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻤﻨــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﻗﺎﺑــﻞ ﻧﺼﺐ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻟﺬﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤــﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﮕﻬــﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺧﺎﺹﺗﺮ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻥﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑــﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺣــﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﻧﻘﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠــﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﺎﺗــﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺳــﺨﺖﮔﻴﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ
ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺷﺪ«.
ﻭﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ SMSﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻏﺎﻓﻞ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻟﺬﺍ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﻭ
ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ.ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ
ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺷــﺮﻗﻲ ﻧﺎﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ «.ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻘﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺳــﻮﺧﺖ ،ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ
ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ
ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﻣﺎﻩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﮕﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻧﺤﻪ
ﻫﻮﺍﻳــﻰ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻯ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ
ﻣﺸــﻜﻞﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥﻫﻮﺍﻳﻰﻛﺸــﻮﺭﺭﻓﻊﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺷــﺪ؟
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻳﺎﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2007ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
692ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
2008ﺑﻪ 502ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻣــﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ
ﻣﻨﺠــﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻮﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﻛــﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨــﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺣــﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﻮﺕ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﭼﺸــﻤﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧــﺮﺥ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺍﺯ
0/23ﺑﻪ ﺍﺯﺍﻱ 1/3ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﺑﻪ 0/13ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 2008
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻧﺤﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ژﺍﻧﻮﻳﻪ 1980ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ 727ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺍﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ -ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪﺍﻱ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻮﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ
ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﻧﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ 39ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻳﻚ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻮﺕ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 21 ،2008ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 800ﭘــﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤــﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨــﮓ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻛــﻪ ﺟﻤﻌــﺎ 46ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ
300ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 20 ،2008ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ
407ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺮﺩﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ 12ﻫﺰﺍﺭﻭ 200ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ 60ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ 70ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ 19ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 20ﻣﺪﻝ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻪ
ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ 9، 737ﻣﺪﻝ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ 737-900ﺗﺎ 737-100ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻫﺰﺍﺭﻭ
873ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 281ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺸﺖ
ﻣﺪﻝ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ
ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺍﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺎﻣﺒﺮ
2007ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ 11ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ 727ﻭ 747ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ 11ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺍﻳﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﮔﻲ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﺍﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
22ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺧﺒﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ 20ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻻﺑﻪﻻﻱ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﮔﻢ ﺷﺪ .ﺧﺒﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﮔﻢ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ
ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻞ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ 15ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻳﻠﺨﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻔﺖ
ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ MDﻭ ﻫﺸﺖ
ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻌﺎ
ﺑﻪﺯﻭﺩﻱ 15ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ«.
55
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻯ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻡﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻨﺪ
ﺳﻤﻴﻪ ﻓﺘﺤﻲ
ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺳﻮﺍﻧﺢ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸﻴﺐ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ،ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺳﻮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺿﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﻣﻨﻈﺮﻱ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻫﻮﺍﻧﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ
ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﻧﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ.
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﻣﻨﻊ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﭼـﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ
ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﺳﺎﺯﻱﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪﻭﺟﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﺩﻛﻪﻳﻜﻲﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ،ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺭﻳﻚ
ﭘﻴﻜﺮ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ
ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﻭ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ
ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 24ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ
ﺩﺭ ﻧــﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻝﻫــﺎﻱ 727 ،707ﻭ 747
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﭘﻨﺞ ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﮔﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻧــﻮ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻪﺳــﻤﺖ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺷــﺮﻗﻲ
ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ،ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ
56
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣــﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻛﻤﻲ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 83ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ 180ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻭﺿﻌﻴـﺖ ﻧـﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳـﻲ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺗـﺎ ﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭼﻪ
ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸﻴﺐﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 22ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﻻﻳﻦ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﻻﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﺷــﺪﻳﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧــﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻫــﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ
) (600-A300ﻭ ﺷﺶ ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻓﻮﻛﺮ 100ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 70ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ
ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺠﻮﺯﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ
ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ 36ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 80
ﺍﺯ 36ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ 83ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ 58ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻠﻜﻲ
ﻭ 28ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺟﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺷـﺪ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻬﻤﻴﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻨﺰﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﻗﻴﻤــﺖ ﺑﻠﻴــﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳــﻔﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﻳــﻲ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﭼﺸــﻤﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﺷﺪﻳﻢ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺗﻘﺎﺿــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻣـﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ
ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻳﻚﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 24ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ
ﺁﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ 20ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻬــﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻃﻲ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ 174ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ 136ﻓﺮﻭﻧــﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻠﻜﻲ ﻭ 38ﻓﺮﻭﻧــﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺟﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻏﻴﺮﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﺎﺕ
ﺧﻮﺍﺑﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻛﻼ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻏﻴﺮﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﻤﺮ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ
ﻋﻤﺮ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
19ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ 30ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻋﻤﺮ
ﻧــﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
15ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺳﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻤﻨﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻮ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗﻲ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ
ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺍﺧﺬ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺷــﺮﻗﻲ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺟﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﻣﻮﺟـﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻳـﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺷـﺎﻣﻞ ﭼـﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻠﻲ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﺸـﻜﻞ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺧﺮﻳـﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺑـﺎ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷـﻮﻳﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ؟
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ
ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺳــﻮﺩﺩﻫﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧــﻮﻉ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺗﺒﻊ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺴﻴﺮﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠــﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ
ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳــﺨﮕﻮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻥ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺑﺮ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻴــﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻱ ﻛﺎﻫــﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ
ﻛــﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺿﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺳـﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ
ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻗـﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻫﺮ ﺷﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻐﻔﻮﻝ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻧــﻮﻉ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ
ﻛﻨــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻤﻞﻭﻧﻘﻞ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ
ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﺪ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻓﺮﺳﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ 20ﺳﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺑﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺸــﺨﺼﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻣﺪﻭﻧﻲ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺪﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫـﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺗﻼﺷـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ
ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﻢﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ
ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻛﻮﺩﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﺑﻄﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﺎﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑــﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺭﺟﺤﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫــﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ
ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺁﻳـﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌـﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﻌﻨـﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺷـﻜﻞ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﮔﺮﻓـﺖ؟ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺻﻨﻌـﺖ ﺍﺳـﺖ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑـﺎ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳـﻤﺖ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﻓﺖ؟
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ 44ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ
ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻫﻮﺍﻳــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ 80ﺑﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺍﻧﺤﺼــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳــﺎﺯﻱ
ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺭﺥ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺴــﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺨﺶﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺳـﻮﺍﻧﺢ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺗـﺎ ﭼﻪﺣﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻴـﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺨـﺶ ﺗﺎﺛﻴـﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺎﭼـﻪ ﺣـﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻫﺎ
ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺳــﻮﺍﻧﺢ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺧﻴــﺮ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ
ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ.ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻣﺎﻩ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﭙﺮﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻫــﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧــﻲ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺗﺎﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺴــﺎﻓﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻛــﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﭘﺲ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻮﺍﻧﺢ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﻄﻊ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺷﺪ.
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ
ﻧﻮﻉ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ
18ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ
،ATRﻓﻮﻛﺮ 50
37ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ
،BAEﻓﻮﻛﺮ ،100ﻳﺎﻙ 42
69ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ
ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ MDﻭ 727،707ﻭ ﺗﻮﭘﻮﻟﻒ ،154ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ 320ﻭ 321
32ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ (600_300)،310ﻭ A300B2B4
12ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ
ﺑﻮﺋﻴﻨﮓ 747
57
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﺗﻮﻣﺒﻴﻞ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﺪﺱ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺴــﺖﻭﺟﻮﻯ ﺳﺮﻧﺦﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ .ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﻘــﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻼﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺪﺷﻪ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﻧﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﺪﻯﮔﺮﻯ
ﺑﺮﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻳﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺵ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ ،ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻯ ﺳﻌﺎﺩﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﺵ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻧﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻯﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻭﺭﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ ﻃﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭﺱﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲﻛﻪ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﻡ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮﮔﺮﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻭﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﻡ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻓﺸــﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ .ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ،ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻰ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﭼﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺍﻭ
ﻃﻰ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﺪﻯﮔﺮﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻳﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻫﭙﻴﻤﺎﻳﻰ
ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗــﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﺍﻥ ،ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟــﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻮﻟﺘﻦﻧﻴﻮﺯ ،ﺍﺗﻮﻣﺒﻴﻞ ﺷــﺨﺼﻰﺍﺵ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻮﻟﺘﻦﻧﻴﻮﺯ
ﺧﺒﺮ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺴﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭﻯ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﺴﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻟﻘﺐ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻫﻴﭽﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1388ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﺴــﻌﻮﺩ ﻣﻴﺮﻛﺎﻇﻤﻲﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺣﺎﻣﻲﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﻜﻮ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ» :ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺳﻪ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ؛ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦﻧﻮﻉ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﺠــﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺭﺑﻄﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﺍﻯ ﻫــﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ«.
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺨﺶﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ» :ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ
ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ .ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﺎ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﻣﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ.ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ -ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺟﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺎﻻﻯ ﺍﺭﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻰ ﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷــﺪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﺎﺟﺮ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻻﻯ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨــﺪ ،ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺨﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻰ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻗﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﭼﻴﻦ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺯﺣﻤﺖ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕﺑﻪﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﺎﻝ 2009
ﺳﺎﻝ 2008
58
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
150ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ
100ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ
ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
12ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺭﺷﺪ
_
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺗﺎﺟﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻤﻔﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ،ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺟﻠﺴﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ،ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻭﺳﺘﺪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﻛﻨﺠﻜﺎﻭ
ﺷﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﭘﺮﺳﻴﺪﻡ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻧﺎﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ .ﺗﺎﺟﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻡ،
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ،ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺳﺎﺯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ
ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ ﭼﻪ
ﻭﻗﺖ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒــﺎﻁ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻓﺮﻕ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ«.
ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑﺨــﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺗﻜﺎﭘﻮﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲﻛﻪ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮ
ﺩﺭﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕﺑﻪﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﺎﻝ2009
ﺳﺎﻝ2007
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
38ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ
66ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
100ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 487ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ
105ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 91ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ
109ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 475ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ
170ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 422ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ
548ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 919ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
77ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 519ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ
98ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 36ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ
110ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 889ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ
87ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 921ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ
63ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 350ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ
ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺗﻰﺑﻪﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﻴﮕﺎﺭ
ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ
ﻓﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺎﻭﻯ
ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻙ ﻳﺎ ﭘﻮﺳﺖ ﺧﺰ
ﻋﻄﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺁﻻﺕ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ
ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﻓﺮﺵ
ﺯﻋﻔﺮﺍﻥ
ﭘﺴﺘﻪ
ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺟﺎﺕ
_
ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
42ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻛﺎﻫﺶ
_
59
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ 7ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻨﻲ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ
ﭘﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ
ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱﺍﺵ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻴﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻤﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ
ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ
ﮔﻨــﺪﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺤﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﭘﺎﺭﺳﺎﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫــﻢ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺷــﺮﻭﻋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻇﺎﻫــﺮﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﭼــﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ «.ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﮔﻤﺮﻙ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﺎﻫﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﺳﻪﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ
83ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺸــﺘﻢ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ،ﺟﺸــﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ 410ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻦ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ 843ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 84ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﺩ ﻛﺸــﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﺎﻫﻪ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺸﺖ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 896ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ
ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﻧﺸــﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻃﺒﻖ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻳــﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺵ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺗﻰ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ 1387ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ 900ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻦ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ 356ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 220
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫــﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 166ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟــﻲ ﻛــﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺘﻪ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻔﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺷﺶ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺳﺎﻝ 1386ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻦ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺍﺯ 15ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ 10ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ83 -84
ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯ 14ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﮔﺬﺷــﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧــﻼﻑ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ،
ﺳﻮﺋﻴﺲ ،ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﻜﻨﺪﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﺮﻯ
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻭﻗﺖ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺗﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛــﺮﺩ» :ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﮔﻨــﺪﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯ
ﺳﺎﻝ 87ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺷــﺶ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻦ
14ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻦ ﮔﺬﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣــﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﺑــﻮﺩ «.ﺍﻭ ﺍﻛﻨــﻮﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﻮﻥ ﺗﻦ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺒــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨــﻲ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ 13/5ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﻮﻥ ﺗﻦ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ
ﻣﺎﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﺁﺗﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴــﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻧﺴــﺒﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 84ﻫﻔﺖ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻦ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑــﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﻋﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 88
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ 15ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺗﺮﺧﻴﺺ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺗﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻤﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ،ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺷــﺶ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻦ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ 15ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳــﻮﺋﻴﺲ،
ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻃﺒــﻖ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺗﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻮﻡ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺷﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ 29ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺑــﺮ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ،ﺳــﻮﺋﻴﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺻــﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻳــﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﺎﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ 506ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﻮﻥ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻣﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ 532ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 323ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﻧﻬﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭ 980ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺗﺒــﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺻــﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 378
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧﺸﻜﺴﺎﻟﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻣﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ 511ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 555ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 411
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﺑــﺪ .ﺩﺭﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ 904ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ
ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻻ ﻗﺪﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭ 794ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ 356ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 220ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 166
ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻃﻰ 29ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻦ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺛﺒﺖﻧﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺁﻥ
ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ 826ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﻮﻥ ﻭ 23ﻫــﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 577
ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 350ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ؛ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ 268ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 103ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 898ﺩﻻﺭ
ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﺪﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ 213ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 103ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺳﺎﻝ ،57ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ 465ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔــﺮﻡ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸــﺎﻭﺭﺯﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ 77ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 265ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 110ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳــﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ 150ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﺎ 1/3ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻦ ﮔﻨــﺪﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﺗﺮﻳﺶ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﻗﺖ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ 164ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥﻭ 173ﻫﺰﺍﺭﻭ 231ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡﮔﻨﺪﻡﺑﻪﺍﺭﺯﺵ 58ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ 453ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 781ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ
ﻃﺒﻖ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎ 60،ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥﻭ 500ﻫﺰﺍﺭﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡﮔﻨﺪﻡ
ﺁﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ 23ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 24ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 412ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ 62،ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ 840ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 200ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ 14ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 771ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 539
ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ،ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ21،ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 918ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ 8ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 261ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯﺑﻜﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ 11ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 835ﻛﻴﻠﻮﮔﺮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ 890ﺩﻻﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻋﻔﺮﺍﻥ ،ﭘﺴــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺵ ،ﮔﻨﺪﻡ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻟﻴﻞﺧﺸﻜﺴﺎﻟﻰﺑﻪﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥﻭﺍﺭﺩﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
60
ﭘﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ 23ﺩﺭﺻﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺣﺘﻢ ﭘﺴــﺘﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻯ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻌﺠﺐ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ
ﺳــﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﻟﺘﻦﻧﻴﻮﺯ ﻭ ﺭﺟﺎﻧﻴﻮﺯ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﭘﺴــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳــﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺗــﺎ ﺑﺮﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﭘﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺟﺎﻧﻴﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻥﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﺘﺮﻧﺘﻰ ﺣﺎﻣــﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭼﻨﺪﻯ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧــﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ
ﺭژﻳﻢﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺭژﻳﻢﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻰ »ﻧﺦ ﻧﻤﺎ« ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻗﻮﻩ
ﻣﺠﺮﻳﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﭘﺴــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑــﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﺭژﻳﻢﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺮﻗﻰ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ
300ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭﺿﻊ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ .ﭘﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﻗﺎﭼﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ
ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﺑﻪ ﺭژﻳﻢﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﭘﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪ 23ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻯ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺗﻌﺮﻓﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻃﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺎﺏ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ
ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﭘﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﺭﺍﺕ ﭘﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺳــﺪﺍﷲ ﻋﺴــﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﻙﻫﺎ ﭘﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭژﻳﻢﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭژﻳﻢﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭ
ﭘﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ» :ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﺴﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭژﻳﻢﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﺭ ﻣﺮﺳﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ
ﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻗﺒﺮﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺭژﻳﻢﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ
ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ «.ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺳــﻪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﭘﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ،
ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺕ ﭘﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺭژﻳﻢﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ «.ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﺍﻭﻻﺩﻱ ،ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﭘﺴــﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﭘﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺭژﻳﻢﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ» :ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻦ ﭘﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭژﻳﻢﺻﻬﻴﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻗﺒﺮﺱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻥ
ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﺍﻱ »ﮔﻨﺒﺪ ﻣﻴﻨﺎ«
ﺩﻭﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﺍﺯﻇﻬﺮ ،ﺧﺒﺮ ﺗﻠﺨﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺑﺎﻭﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺴﺎﻟﮕﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻮﺍﺑﻐﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻲﺑﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ،ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺷﮕﺮﻑ
ﻭ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺟﺎﻯ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ .ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺷﻌﺮ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺷﻌﺮﻧﻮ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﺨﻮﺵ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺷﺪ .ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﺍﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺍﻫﻪﻧﻮﺍﺯﻯﺍﺵ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺎﺯ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺷﮕﻔﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻧﮓ ﺻﺪﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻻ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ .ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺷﮕﺮﻑ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﺍﺯﻯﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﺭﻫﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻧﻮﺍﺯﻯ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱﺍﺵ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺷﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ
»ﮔﻨﺒﺪ ﻣﻴﻨﺎ« ﻭ» ﺩﻭﺩ ﻋﻮﺩ« ﺭﺍ.
ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ1334 -1388 :
ﻏﻢ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻕ ﻳﺎﺭ
ﺳﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﻭﻝ – ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
54ﺳــﺎﻟﮕﻲ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺯﻭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻗﻠﺐ ،ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﻗﻠﺒﻲ ﭘﺮ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺶ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ.
ﺁﻥ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﺗﺪﺍﻋﻲﮔﺮ ﺧﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺑﺪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﺷﻮﻣﺶ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺑﻬﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﺶ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺖ ،ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ .ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﻴﻠﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺲ ﺧﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻗﻠﺐ ﭘﺮ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﻲ ﺧﺴــﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﺪ .ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ
ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻮﺍﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳــﺘﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺎﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻠﺮﺯﺍﻧــﺪ .ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺑﺪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻓﺴــﻮﺱ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻓﺴــﻮﺱ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﺒﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ -ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﺶ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﺳﻒ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ
62
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺸــﺪ -ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺶ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﻛﺴﻰ ﻳﺎﺭﻯﺍﺵ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ.
ﺣﺎﻻ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﻞ ﭘﻴﻐﺎﻡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ
ﺳﻮ ﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﺭﺩﻯ ﺩﻭﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﺗﻠﺨﻰ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺼﻪ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻗﺼﻪ ﺑﻰﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰﻫﺎ ،ﺑﻰﺣﺮﻣﺘﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ .ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺮگ ﺑﺎﺷــﻜﻮﻫﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﺸﺪ.
ﺍﻯﻛﺎﺵ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﻰ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﻭﻡ – ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
»ﻣﻀﺮﺍﺏ ﺍﻭﻟﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻀﺮﺍﺏ ﺩﻭﻣﺶ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﺵ
ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺳﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ »ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻮﺵ ﺻﻔﻮﺕ« ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻨﻔﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺣﺠﺘﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ »ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻮﺵ ﺻﻔــﻮﺕ« ﻭ ﻧﻮﺭﻋﻠﻲﺧﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﻭﻣﻨــﺪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﺍﺷــﺎﻋﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﻩﺍﻧــﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ؛ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻲ
ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻫﻤﻪﺷــﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
»ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰﺧﺎﻥ ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺳﺮ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺥ
ﻛﺸﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ »ﺑﺎﺭﺑﺪ« ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭﻧﻮﺍﺯﻯ
ﺑﻪﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﻗﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺳﺒﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﺶ
ﺛﺒﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺒﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺰﺭگ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ
ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﺍﺵ ،ﻗﻄﻌﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻀﺮﺍﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻠﻮﺩﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻳﻊ ،ﺩﺭﺍﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ
ﻣﻀﺮﺍﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻗﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺷــﻔﺎﻑ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ
ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺗﻮﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻗﻬﺎﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﻮﺍﺧﺘﻦ
ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﺎﺗﺶ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺍﺏﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ،ﭘﺎﺳــﺎژ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻀﺮﺍﺑﻲ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻓﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ.ﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺪﻭﻻﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ
ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻏﻨﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻏﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻪﺑﻪﺳﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺴــﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﻋﺼﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻨــﺮ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﻕﺧﺎﻥ ،ﺳــﻤﺎﻉ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ،
ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﺳــﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺍﺑﻮﺍﻟﺤﺴﻦ ﺻﺒﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺳــﺒﻚ ،ﺭﻭﺵ ﻭ
ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺑﺪ
ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﺎﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ» .ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ« ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺐﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ
)ﻣﺪﻭﻻﺳﻴﻮﻥ( ،ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻭ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﺑﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺸﺘﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﮔﻮﺷﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﺑﺒﺨﺸﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻮﺯﻳﺴﻴﻨﻰ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻯ
ﻣﺘﺒﺤﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺩﻳﻔﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺴﻠﻂ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻫﺎﻯ
ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸــﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ »ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ« ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ
ﺳــﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ »ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺮﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﻮﺭ« ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ
ﺭﻭﻱ ﻧﮕــﺮﺵ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺳــﻨﺘﻮﺭﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ،ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ
ﺑﺨﺸــﻴﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﭘﺮﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ،ﺗﻤﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻤﺎﺭﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ
ﻭ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﻮﻡ – ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴﺎﺯﻱ
ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴﺎﺯﻱ »ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ« ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻄﺢ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷــﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﺮﺍﻗﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴﺎﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺳﺒﻚ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﻕ
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺫﻭﻕ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ ،ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ» .ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ« ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻓﺮﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻢﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻬﺶ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ »ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺩ« ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺸﺘﻮﺍﻧﻪ
ﺍﻓﻘﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺭﻳﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺗﻨﻮﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺷﻨﻮﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﺴﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻠﻮﺩﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﻃﺮﺏﺍﻧﮕﻴــﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺜــﺮ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ »ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ
ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻳﻚ
ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ ،ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ
ﻧﻮﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﺎﺕ ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺷــﻮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﭘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻰ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻣﻤﺎﺭﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺷﺶ ﻣﻰﻃﻠﺒﺪ؛
ﻗﻄﻌﺎﺗﻲ ﭘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﺍﺏ ،ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ،ﭘﺎﺳــﺎژ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻀﺮﺍﺑﻲ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ.
ﻳﻚ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ﻗﻄﻌﺎﺕ ﻭﻱ ،ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ
)ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﻊﺑﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻀﺮﺍﺑﻰ( ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﻫﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺷــﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻋﺎﺕ
ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﻱ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻔﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺻﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻔــﺖ ﻣﻀﺮﺍﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺻــﺪﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﺗﻴﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻑ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺒﻚ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ
ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ،ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ؛ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻑ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻤﺒﻚ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻗﺮﻳﺤﻪ ﺫﺍﺗﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ
ﺗﺒﺤﺮ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺭﻳﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯﻯ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻏﺰﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺍﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﺍﺵ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ »ﺁﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻧﺎﻥ« ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﻰ »ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺷﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ«
ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﺷﻴﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻲﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻪ ﺑﺨــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣــﺪ ،ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻀﺮﺍﺏ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻀﺮﺍﺏﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻌﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ
ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨــﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﺗﺼﺎﻧﻴﻔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ«
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﭼﻴﺮﻩﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﺎﻧﻴﻒ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ – ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺎﻋﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻋﺎﺭﻑ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺎﻋﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳﻢ ،ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ،ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻋﻠﻴــﺰﺍﺩﻩ )ﺗﺎﺭ( ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠــﻲ ﻛﻴﺎﻧﻲﻧﮋﺍﺩ )ﻧــﻲ( ،ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩ ﮔﻨﺠﻪﺍﻱ
)ﻛﻤﺎﻧﭽــﻪ( ﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻫﻤﻨﺪ )ﺗﻤﺒﻚ( ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳــﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ »ﻓﺎﻃﻤﻪ ﻭﺍﻋﻈﻰ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻭ ﻣﺪﺗــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺩﻳــﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳــﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴــﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1356ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺷــﻴﺪﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻫﻮﺷﻨﮓ ﺍﺑﺘﻬﺎﺝ -ﺳــﺎﻳﻪ -ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ
ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﻧﺎﻡ ﻋﺎﺭﻑ ﻗﺰﻭﻳﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻋــﺎﺭﻑ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻠﭽﻴﻦ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ،ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺗﻚﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﭘﻴﺶﺩﺭﺁﻣــﺪ ،ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺭﻧﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻳﻚﺻﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺮﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﻛﺴــﺘﺮ ﮔﻞﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭼﻨﺪﺻﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻟﺤــﺎﻅ ﺗﻚﻧﻮﺍﺯﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺗﻌﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ
ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺴــﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺍﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺸﺘﺎﺭ 17
ﺷــﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ژﺍﻟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ
ﻛﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﭼﺎﻭﻭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻴﺪﺍﻧﺎﻥ،
ﻣﻮﺳﺴــﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﭼﺎﻭﻭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﺳﻨﺘﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ »ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻟﻄﻔﻲ«» ،ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻴﺰﺍﺩﻩ«،
»ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﻛﻴﺎﻧﻲ« ﻭ »ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﮔﻨﺠﻪﺍﻱ« ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﭘﺨﺘﮕﻲ
ﺳــﺒﻚ ﻭ ﺳــﻴﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺷﻌﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻬﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻭﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺻﺒﺢ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺐ ﻣﻰﺳﺎﺧﺖ ،ﻣﻰﺯﺩ ،ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 59ﭼﺎﻭﻭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﺮ
ﻭ ﻣﻮﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺭﺿﺎ ﻟﻄﻔﻰ
ﻭ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻴﺰﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﺎﻭﻭﺵ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﺎﻭﻭﺵ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺷــﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻋﺎﺭﻑ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻰ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺷﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺷــﻬﺮﺍﻡ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﻯ ،ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﻯ،
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺝ ﺑﺴــﻄﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻧﻮﺭﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺳــﺘﺨﻮﺵ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺁﻥ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ
ﻣﺸــﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻠﻮﺕ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺑﻪ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷــﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺴﺘﺎﻥ ،1383ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎ
ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑــﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺷــﻬﺮﺍﻡ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﻱ،
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ ﺑﺮ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷﺪ.
63
ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭﻡ
ﻫﻢ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺘﻢ
ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻋﺼﺒﺎﻧﻲ
ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑـﻪ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻫـﺎﻱ »ﻣﺸـﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ«
ﺑﻴﻨﺪﺍﺯﻳﻢ ،ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺳﺨﻨﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﺭﺩﻣﻨﺪﻱ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻋﺼﺒﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪﻱ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎ ،ﺩﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﮔﻞ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺪﺭﺩﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺳﻮ ﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ
ﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺰﻭﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛـﻪ :ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻳـﺪ؟ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺲ
ﺳـﺮﺍﻏﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﺮ
ﻧﻮﺍﻳﺶ ،ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ.
***
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﺮﻭﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ 51ﺳﺎﻟﮕﻲﺍﺵ
ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻝ ،ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸﺖ ،ﺷﻤﺎ 51ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻳـﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺛﺮ »ﺗﻤﻨﺎ« ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻣﻲﺭﺳـﺪ،
ﺻﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺳﺎﻟﺨﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺩﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺻﺪﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺻﻔﺖ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﺪ ،ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻟﻘﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ؟
ﺩﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺨﺖ ﻭ ﺻﻌﺒﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺁﻣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺻﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺧﺴــﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ
ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻟــﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﺪﺍ
ﺯﺧﻢ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﻳﺎ
ﺑﻪﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺳﺮﻋﺖﮔﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺘﺎﺏ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻱ 60ﻭ
70ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﺳﺖﺗﺮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ
ﺷــﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻴﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺠﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻡ.
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻼﻥﺗﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺴــﺘﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﮕﺮﺷﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺣﺮﺟﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺯﻧﺪﮔــﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫــﺮ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ )ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻠﻲﺣﺘﻲ( ﺭﺍﺿﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻫﻨﺮ ،ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ،
ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﭘﺬﻳﺮ ،ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﻴﻨــﺶ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻭ ،ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﺶ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺗﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ
64
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﺎﻧﺖ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﭘﺸﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ،
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ،
ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻛﻦ،
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ،ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ،ﻧﻮﺭﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯ ،ﺻﺪﺍﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ.
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﻣﻮﺳـﻴﻘﻰ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻭ ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ
ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﺪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺑﻴﻨﺪ.
ﭘﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻭ
ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻣﻨﺪﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻭ ﺗﭙﺶ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺷــﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮ ،ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻳــﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻡ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺷــﺪﻳﻢ .ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺿﺮﺑــﺎﻥ ﺩﻝ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺟﺴــﺘﻦ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ،ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺯﻡ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻱ
ﺳﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻳﻚﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﺑﻲﻣﻬﺮﻯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﺭﺥ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻩﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻲﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻨﺸــﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺗــﺎ ﺑﻪﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻮﻳﺖﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻄﻤﻪ ﻧﺨﻮﺭﺩ،
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ.
ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﺟﻬﺖﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺑﻌﺪﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪ!
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﻯ ﭼﺎﻭﻭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﮔﻼﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭﺩ ﺩﻝ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻐﺎﺛﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﺵ
ﻭﻃﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺻﺪﻙ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺑﻲﭼﻮﻥ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻢ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ
ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ
ﺑــﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﺑﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻝ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ .ﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻓﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺩﻟﻰ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺩﺭ
ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﭘﺴﻨﺪﻡ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﺎﻋﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺑﺪﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ »ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺳﺮﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﺳــﺖ« ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣــﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺤــﺮﻡ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴــﺖ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ
ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻧﺶ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻢ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﭼﺮﺍ؟
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻡ .ﻗﺒﻼ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻢ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻢ
ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻻﺍﻗﻞ
ﺭﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﻏﺬ ﺑﺰﻧﻢ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﺎﺗﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ »ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ« ﻭ ...ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ
ﺍﻭﺟﺶ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﻫﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻧﻢ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ...ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪﺯﻋﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺜﻼ »ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺎﺳــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜﻼ
ﻛﺎﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺸﺸﻲﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ؟
ﻛﻞ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ...
...ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﺍﻻﺕ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﮕﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﭼﻴﺴــﺖ؟ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧــﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴــﻢ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳــﻤﻴﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ
)ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ( ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﻤﻴﺖ
ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻨﺪ؟ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻦ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻛﻦ .ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒــﻪ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ؟ ﻳــﻚ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩﻱ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ،ﻣﺜﻼ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺗﺠﻮﻳﺪﻱ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺷــﺎﻩﺯﻳﺪﻱ .ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻭ
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ،
ﺳﺮﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﻩﺯﻳﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﺋﻮﺋﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ
ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ.
ﻣﺎﺋﻮ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻭﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ «.ﺍﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ
ﻳــﻚ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫــﻢ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭﻡ ،ﻫﻢ
ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺘﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻋﺼﺒﺎﻧﻲ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺷﺨﻮ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ
ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺷـﺨﻮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴـﻨﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭼﻪ
ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳـﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﭙﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺁﻣﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺰﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻘﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﺭﺳـﺪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻯ ﻧﺒﺎﺷـﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻛﺘﺒﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷـﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴـﻞ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻯ
ﺩﻭﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻟﺸﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳـﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺴـﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ
ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟـﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷـﺘﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ،ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎ،
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓــﺖ ﺻﺤﻴﺢﺗﺮﻯ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷﺎﺧﻪﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺭﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ،
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻯ
ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻭﺳﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺷﻤﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺩﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎ
ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ -ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ
ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻳﺮﭘﺎ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺑﺎﺭ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺟﺪﻯﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻭ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﻮﻕ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ،ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻭ
ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻲﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ
ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑــﺮﺩ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ
ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ
ﺍﻋﺘﺒــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨــﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﺼــﺎﺹ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ
ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ،ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺳﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺘﻤﻊﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳــﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻗﺒﻞ
65
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸــﺖ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺷﺐﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ 30ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺟﺸــﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻰ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﺘﻌﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﻃﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﮔــﺮﻭﻩ ﺁﻭﺍﺯﻯ ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻴﻦ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﻓﺠﺮ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ
ﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﺮ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺁﺳــﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ
ﻭ ﻓﺎﺧﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻀﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺷــﻰ ﻭ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩ
ﻣﻬﻤﻲﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻣﺪﺕ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺱ ﻭ ﻋﻴﻨﻰ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺗﺮ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣــﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳــﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧــﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﻜﺴﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺷﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻧﻘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈــﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸــﻜﻞﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ.
ﭼﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﻣﺴﻨﺪ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪ؟
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻠﻰﺑﻪﺑﺎﻗﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﭘﺴﺖﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻮﺍﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﻢ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻳــﺎﻭﺭ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻴﻢ
ﻟﻄﻒﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻳﻎ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻌﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ
ﻭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ
ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺑــﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻢ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺭﺥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ .ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻨﺮ ،ﺍﺛﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﻻ )ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ( ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻋﺮﺿــﻪ ،ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻨــﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ
66
ﻛﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺴــﺨﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻱ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻲ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻨــﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﺟﺪﻱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﺪ .ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻻ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺿﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺎﻟﺮﻱﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲﻳﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺴــﭙﻮﻫﺎ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻳﻖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ،ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻲﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻧﺸــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﻛﺴﭙﻮﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺣﻞ ﻣﻮﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺴﭙﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻛﺴﭙﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ
ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻠﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﭘﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠــﺎﺩ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻛﺴــﭙﻮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺪﺕ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﺎﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺧﻴــﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺳﻌﻲ ﺷﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺳﺖﻛﻢ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﺎ
ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺳــﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.ﺑﻪﻛﺎﻻﻱﻫﻨﺮﻱﺑﺎﻳﺪﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻛﺎﻻﻳﻲﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺍﻱﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺷﻮﺩﻛﻪﺍﺭﺯﺵﺁﻥﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎﻛﺎﻫﺶﻧﻤﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪﺑﻠﻜﻪﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶﭘﻴﺪﺍﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻭ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺒﺪ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﻣﺼﺮﻑﺧﻮﺩﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﻫﻨﺪ،ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﺑﺮﺍﻱﺁﺛﺎﺭﻫﻨﺮﻱﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪﻭﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻭﻋﺮﺿﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩﻣﻮﺭﺩﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﻗﺮﺍﺭﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ
ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻫﻨﺮﺩﺭﺭﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻛﺎﻣﻞﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺒﻚ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬـﺎﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷـﺘﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﻛـﻪ ﻣﻮﺳـﻴﻘﻰ ﻃﻰ
ﻫﻢﻛﻪﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﺍﻣﺮﻛﻤﻚﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛـﺮﺩ ،ﺟﺎﻟـﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑـﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻮﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘـﺪﺍﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ،ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭ ،ﺳﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬـﻢ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻲﺷـﺪ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﺮﺻـﻪ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷـﺎﻫﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ
ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﺳـﺎﺯﻯ ﺭﻳﺸـﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻰ ﺷﺪ .ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻮﺳـﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺎپ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺟﺎ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷـﺖ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺳــﺎﻟﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺮﻓﺖ .ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ
ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ،
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺸـﻜﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﺳـﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ،ﻗﻠﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ؟
ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻮﺟــﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻟﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺳﺨﺖﮔﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻌﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨــﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺷــﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ
ﺷﺎﻫﺪﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢﻣﺸﻜﻞﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩﺳﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎ
ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫــﻲ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﻀﺎ
ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻃــﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ
ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﻜﺴــﻮﺕ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖﻭﺳﺎﺯﺳﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎﻭﻣﺠﺘﻤﻊﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ-ﻫﻨﺮﻱﺍﻳﻦﻣﺸﻜﻞﻣﺮﺗﻔﻊ
ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺒﺪ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻚ ،ﭘﺎپ ،ﺳــﻨﺘﻲ
ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ
ﻭ ﻧﻮﺍﺣــﻲ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ،
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺣﺘــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ
ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﺪ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ.
ﻓﻜﺮﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪﻫﻨﺮﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ؟
ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺟﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻇﺮﻑ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﺒــﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﭼﻨﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻭ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﻓﺎﺭﻍﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴﻼﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺿﻴــﺎﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻋﺎﻟﻲﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑــﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﭼﻨﺪﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ
ﻫﻨﺮ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻓﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ
ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅ ﻧﮕﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺟﻬﺶ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﻣﺪﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺴــﺠﻤﻲﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺛﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ -
ﺷﻨﻴﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﺴــﺠﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﺍﻫﮕﺸﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ -ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻲﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺭﺍﻫﺒــﺮﺩﻱ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻨﻈﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺟﺴــﺘﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ -ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﭘﺮﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻨــﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﺗــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻱﻛﺎﺭﻱﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻬﻤــﻲﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨــﺮﻱ ﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻬــﺎﺩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫــﺪﺍﻑ ﻭ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﺑــﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ
ﻣﺜﺒﺖﺗﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ ،ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺧﻮﺷــﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﻣــﻞ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕــﻲ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷــﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ،ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ،ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ -ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻭ ...ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸـﻜﻼﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﻭ ﺷﺪ.ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ
ﻋﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸــﺎﺭﻛﺖﻫﺎ
ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺣﻞﻧﺸــﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺳـﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺷـﺎﻫﺪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﺪﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺘﺮﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﻲﺷﻚﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩﻣﺪﺕﺩﺭﻫﺮﻋﺮﺻﻪﺍﻱﺍﺯﺟﻤﻠﻪﺣﻮﺯﻩﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ
ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﻓﺎﺭﻍﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﻣﺪﺗﻲ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ
ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺧﻠﻞ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﺎﺭﻍﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﭘــﺲ ﺿــﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺟﻮﺍﻧــﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻌﻲ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺳﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ،ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ
ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﺱ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻲﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ
ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺎﺭﻍﺍﻟﺘﺤﺼﻴﻼﻥ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺭﺷــﺘﻪ
ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ ﻭﻗﻔﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻲﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻧﺸﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻋﻠـﻲ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺳـﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﻣﻮﺳـﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؟
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫــﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﺗــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻞ
ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﻭﻱ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳﺎﻝﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱﺍﺯﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﻣﻤﻴﺰﻱ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﮔﻼﻳﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤﺎﺕ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻔﺮﻣﺎﻳﻴﺪ.
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ
ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ،ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ
ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﺠﻮﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺸــﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﻫﺮ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﻭ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ،ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻭ
ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﻳﻌﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻌﻲ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺷﺪ .ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺷــﻌﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺻــﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺷــﻌﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺳــﺮﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺷﻌﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ
ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ
ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺴﺮﻳﻊ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﻣﺠﻮﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻣﺎﻛﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﺴــﺮﺕ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ
ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪ
ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺎﻳﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﻣﻮﻓــﻖ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨــﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑــﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﻻﺯﻡﺑﺮﺍﻱﺧﻠﻖﺁﺛﺎﺭﻫﻨﺮﻱﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ،ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﺮ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﻤﻪﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﺍﺯﺣﻮﺯﻩﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪﺍﻳﻦﻧﻮﻳﺪﺭﺍﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺮﺳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻧﺸﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖﻓﻌﺎﻝﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥﻭﺑﺨﺶﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲﺷﺎﻫﺪﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻫﻨﺮﺩﺭﻫﻤﻪ
ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ.
67
ﻋﻜﺲ ﻫﺎﻯ ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ :ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻰ
ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰﻣﺘﻦﻭﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﭘﺮﻭژﻩﻧﺎﺗﻤﺎﻡﻧﺎﺻﺮﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ
»ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﮔﻮﺍﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﻃﺎﻫﺒﺎﺯ
ﻃﻰ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ،
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ
ﺑﻬﺮﺍﻡﺑﻴﻀﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺑﺎﺷﻮ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﻪ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ« ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ،
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ »ﻓﺮﻳﺎﺩ« ﺭﺍ ﺟﻠﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﻧﺎﺻﺮﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ » 80ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ.
ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺶ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻠﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺳــﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ«» ،ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ«
ﻭ »ﻧﻔﺮﻳﻦ« ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫﻢ ﺳــﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
»ﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ«» ،ﻧﺎﺧﺪﺍ ﺧﻮﺭﺷــﻴﺪ« ﻭ »ﻛﺎﻏﺬ ﺑﻰﺧﻂ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﺑﻰﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭘﺮﻛﻴﻔﻴﺘﺶ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻰ
»ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺟﻨﮕﻠﻰ« ﻛﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﻓﺨﻤﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻧﺎﺗﻤﺎﻡ »ﺭﻭﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺯﻧﮕﻰ« ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ
ﺷــﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﻭ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﻧﻴﻤﻪﻛﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﻪﻫﺎﻯ
60ﻭ 80ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳــﻰ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 81ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ
»ﺯﻧﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻣﻰ« ،ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﺷﺮ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﺎپ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎپ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻧﺸــﺪ ﻭ
ﻫﺮﻃﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻠﻮﻯ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺐ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ،
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﺷــﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ
ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨــﺪﻯ ﺳــﻌﻴﺪ ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴــﺮﻯ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻬﻴــﻪ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ
»ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﻣﺎﺟــﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﺎﻟﺒﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧــﻰ »ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ« ،ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﺑﻴﭽﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﭘﻴﺰﻭﺩﻫﺎ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ«
ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ :ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ـ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ :ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ ﺻﺒﺎ ـ ﺻﺪﺍﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ :ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﻮﺭﺩﻯ ـ ﻃﺮﺍﺡ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ،ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﻭ
ﺁﻛﺴﺴﻮﺍﺭ :ﻓﺎﺿﻞ ژﻳﺎﻥ ـ ﻃﺮﺍﺡ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺮﻯ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ :ﺣﺴﻦ ﺭﻭﺡﭘﺮﻭﺭﻯ ـ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ :ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﺪﺑﻴﮕﻰ ـ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰ :ﻣﺤﺴــﻦ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ـ ﻣﻨﺸﻰ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ :ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺯﺭﻭﻗﻰ ـ ﻋﻜﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ :ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﻰ ـ ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ :ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻰ ـ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻰ :ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﺑﻬﺎﻧﻰ ـ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ :ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻰ ـ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ :ﺣﺴﻦ ﻧﺠﻢ ـ
ﻣﺠﺮﻯﻃﺮﺡ :ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺧﺴﺮﻭﺟﺮﺩﻯـ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ :ﺳﻌﻴﺪﺣﺎﺟﻰ ﻣﻴﺮﻯـ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ :ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ـ 1382
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ :ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻳﺎﺭﻯ ،ﮔﻼﺏ ﺁﺩﻳﻨﻪ ،ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ،ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺩ ،ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ...،ﻭ ﻣﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﻭﻓﺎﻣﻬﺮ.
ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ :ﺑﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ،ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺯﻯ ﺗﺨﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﻣﻲﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞﻛﻬﻮﻟﺖﺳﻦﻭﻋﺸﻖﺑﻪﻧﺨﻠﺴﺘﺎﻧﻰﻛﻪﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﺍﺯﺗﺮﻙﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺍﻣﺘﻨﺎﻉﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﻭﺑﺎﻧﻮﻩﺧﻮﺩﻛﻪﺩﺧﺘﺮﻯﺟﻮﺍﻥﻭﻣﻌﻠﻢﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﻋﺮﺍﻗﻰ )ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻓﺴــﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺷﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ،
ﻓﺎﺟﻌﻪﺍﻯﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪﻛﻪﺑﻪﻋﺸﻘﻰﺗﻠﺦﻭﻳﻜﺠﺎﻧﺒﻪﻣﻨﺘﻬﻰﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥﺣﺘﻰﺑﻪﻣﺪﺩﻋﺸﻖﻫﻢﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪﺁﻥﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﻭﺣﺸﺘﻨﺎﻙ
ﺭﺍﺍﺯﺫﻫﻦﺩﺧﺘﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥﺑﺰﺩﺍﻳﺪﻭﻋﺎﻗﺒﺖﺩﺭﻧﺒﺮﺩﻯﻛﻪﺑﻪﻳﻚﺣﻤﺎﺳﻪﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ،ﺗﻘﺎﺹﺳﺨﺘﻰﭘﺲﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
68
ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﻳﻌﻨــﻰ ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌــﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺷــﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻴﭽﺎﺭﻩ
ﻭ ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺣﻞ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ،ﺑﻴﭽــﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺎﺻــﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ
ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻧﺴــﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺍﻭ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻮﻳﻖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﻴﭽﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ،ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﻗﻠــﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛــﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﺨﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
»ﻧﺎﺧﺪﺍ ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪ« ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ
ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1382ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺳــﻌﻴﺪ ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴــﺮﺩ .ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺗﻰ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﺟــﺮﺍ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺗﻰ
ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭﻣﺎﻩ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ
ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻟﻮﻛﻴﺸــﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ
ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻟﻮﻛﻴﺸﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ،ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻠﺒﻪﻫﺎ،
ﻣﺪﺭﺳــﻪ ،ﻗﻬﻮﻩﺧﺎﻧــﻪ ،ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﭼــﻪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﺮﻣﺎﻩ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺣﺖ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﻰ ﺳﻪ ﻫﻜﺘﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﺨﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﻧﺪﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺍﻣﻼﻙ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ
ﺧﺎﻙ ﺷﻴﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ؛
ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﺑﺮ 250ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﻣﻴﻮﻥ 10ﭼﺮﺥ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺷﻴﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﻳﺨﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺴﻄﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﮔﻴﺎﻫﻰ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﺴﻄﻴﺢ ،ﺗﻌﺮﻳﺾ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻰ ،ﺁﺳﻔﺎﻟﺖﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺳﻔﺖﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﻣﻬﺮﻣﺎﻩ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻳﻚﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ 10ﺑﻨﺎ ﻭ 80ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ،ﻃﺮﺍﺡ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻠﻰ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ
ﺣﺼﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻴﺎﻫﻰ ،ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﺣﺼﻴﺮﻯ ﺳﻘﻒﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺖﻭﺳﺎﺯ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﻮﺍﺩ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺳﻮﺍﺱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺸﻢ ،ﻣﻴﻨﺎﺏ ﻭ
ﺑﻨﺪﺭﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻛﺴﺴﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎ ،ﺣﺼﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻇﺮﻭﻑ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ
»ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ )ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ
ﺿﺪﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ »ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﭘﺪﺭ«» ،ﺍﺗﻮﺑﻮﺱ ﺷﺐ« ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻠﻮﺗﺮ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣﺰﻫﺎ،
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ( .ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻓﺴﺮ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ
ﻋﺸﻘﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﻧﺸــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺳــﺎﻝ 82ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﻃﻰ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺪﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻰ ،ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻳﻰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ»:ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ» .ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺴــﻬﻴﻼﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻙ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﺛﺮ ،ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ«.
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ
ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺳــﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻰ ﺑﻰﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﻰ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺣﺮﻑ ﻭ
ﺣﺪﻳﺚﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﻯﺗﺮ ،ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ .ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﭼﻨﺪﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻳﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺶ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻫﺮ ﻣﺘﻨﻰ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻢ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺣﺮﻓﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﭽﻪ ﺯﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﭼﻮﻥ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﭽﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ» :ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻓﺴﺮ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻢ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺼﺎﺋﺐ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻢ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺠﺐ ﻭﺣﻴﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺮﻡﺧﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪ ﭘﺪﺭﺑﺰﺭگ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻤﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺴﺮ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﺵ ﺗﻌﺮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﺮﻧﮓ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺑﻰﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻗﺎﻯ
ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮓﺗﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﺍﻯ ﻧﺎﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻢﻏﻴﺮﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﺠﻠﺴﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻭ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﺰﻭ ﺍﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﺕ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖﻭﺳﺎﺯ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﻛﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻮﻛﻴﺸﻦ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺁﻛﺴﺴﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﺠﻠﺴﻪ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ«.
ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺵ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻮﻳﺴﻰ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺷــﺄﻥ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳــﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻟﻒ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻭ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﻮﻡ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ
ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺁﻥ 9ﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﺠﻠﺴــﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺷﺮﻑ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺻﻮﺭﺗﺠﻠﺴﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻏﻴﺮﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ
ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﻋﺮﺏ ﻭ ﻋﺠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺒــﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻋﺮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻰ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻰﻫــﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﻏﻴﺮﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻪ ﺯﺑﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺳﻮ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻰ
ﺳﺎﺯﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ«...
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ
»ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺸﻜﻞﺳﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ» :ﭼﻮﻥ
ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻡ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﻯ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺸﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻤﻞ ﺑﺮ ﺻﺤﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻡ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺗﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﺍﺣﺪﻯ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﻪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻧﮕﻤﺎﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺁﻥ
ﺷﺶ ،ﻫﻔﺖﻣﺎﻩ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﻢ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺳﺮﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷﺪﻡ .ﭘﺲ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺩﺍﻝ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺻﻼﺡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻯ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﻰ
69
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻰﺩﺭﻳﻎ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ«.
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺑﺘــﺪﺍ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﻓﺴــﺮ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎﻓﺮﻭﺗــﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻳﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ،ﻣﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﻭﻓﺎﻣﻬﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻣﺪ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪ .ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ،ﮔﻼﺏ ﺁﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳــﺪ» :ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﺎﺯ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺑﺪﺍ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺘﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺕ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻧﺪﻫﻢ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻳﺎﺭﻯ ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ،ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻨﻪﺍﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ )ﺁﺗﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻣﻦ( ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻓﺴــﺮ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻰ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺘﻰ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﻢ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻭﺗﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻳﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻢ ،ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻢ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎﻟﻰ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻳﺎﺭﻯ ،ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩ ﺷﺪﻡ«.
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﭘﻼﻥﻫﺎﻯ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ ﺩﻯﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ 82ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﻧﺪﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻲ
ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﷲ ﻛﻌﺒﻲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻛﻼﻛﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺯﺩ .ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﭘﻴﺶﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻗﻮﻯ ﻭ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ )ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺳــﻪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺑــﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪ( ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ
45ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺟﻤﻊ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﺎ ﻛﭙﻰ ﺻﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ 140ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ 85ﺭﻭﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒــﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺻﺮﻑ 255ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻧﻘﺪﻳﻨﮕﻰ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ )ﻣﻨﻬﺎﻯ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻛﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ،
ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﺑﺮ 35ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ( ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ 57ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺷــﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﮕﺎﺗﻴﻮﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ» :ﻣﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻛﺴﺴﻮﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﻨﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺪﺭﻋﺒﺎﺱ ،ژﻧﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭ ﺑﻰﺻﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﻗﺸﻢ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﺗﻴﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﻛﺪﺍﻛﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺑﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﻨﺪ.
1/5ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﺿﺎﻓــﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻞ ﻛﺎﺭ ) ﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 60ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺁﻥ( ﻭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺭﻧﺞ ﻭ ﺻﺒﻮﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻰ
ﺍﻓﺴﻮﺱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﺸﺪ«.
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻃﺒــﻖ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ 57ﺩﺭﺻﺪ )ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 60ﺩﻗﻴﻘــﻪ( ﺍﺯ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻮﻧﺘﺎژ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﻘﻂ ﭘﻼﻥﻫﺎ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺳﺮ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻝ ﻗﺼﻪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻫــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺁﺗﺶﺳــﻮﺯﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻟﻮﻟﻪﻛﺸــﻰ ﮔﺎﺯ )ﺣﺪﻭﺩ
ﺳــﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ( ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ ﻗﻬﻮﻩﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﺨﺘﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻘﻴﻪ
ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺭﻭﻧﺪﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﺍﺵ ﺷﺶ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ ،ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺰﺩ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺁﺏ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻭ
ﺍﺟﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺨﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺮﺗﺐ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻰ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺣﺎﺟﻰﻣﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺑﻪ
ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎ ،ﺁﻛﺴﺴــﻮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻴــﭻ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻓﺮﺳــﻮﺩﮔﻰ ﻭ ﻛﻬﻨﮕﻰ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺑﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻓﺘﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑــﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺎﺯ
ﺑﻌــﺪﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻗﺼﻪ »ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ« ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﺧﻮﺷــﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫــﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﻣﺤﻜﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻰ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺳــﺮ ﭘﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺷﺶ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺶ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪ،
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻧﺠﺶﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ
ﻧﻤﻲﻳﺎﺑﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻋﺴﮕﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺟﺸﻦ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺖ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺭﻣﻐﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺪﻫﻢ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﻮﺭ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ .ﺧﺐ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺳﺖﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﻋﺘﻼﻯ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﺣﻤﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻓﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ ﻧﺸﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻡ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﻳﻰ ﻗﺒﻼ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻡ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺁﻥﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﻭﺳﻴﻊﺗﺮﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺎﻋﺪﺕ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ«.
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺶ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠﻰ »ﭼﺎﻯ ﺗﻠﺦ« ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻘﺪﺭ
ﺟﺪﻯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻓﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ
ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪﻣﺎﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺸــﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻓﺠﺮ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻳﺮ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﻮﻳﺪ.
70
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﺮﮔﻰﺍﺯﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ»ﭼﺎﻯﺗﻠﺦ«
ﻫﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻭﻧﻲ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭼﻰ؟
ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺲ – 1 Dﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ـ ﺑﻌﺪﺍﺯﻇﻬﺮ ـ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﻧﺸﻴﻤﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﻴﻤﻦ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺩﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺳــﻤﺖ ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻮﻱ
ﭘﻨﺠﺮﻩ ،ﻣــﺮﺩﺩ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﺱ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺳــﺮ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ :ﺑﻴﺎ ﺟﻠﻮ ،ﻧﺘﺮﺱ ،ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺧﺰﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻏﻮﺵ ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ .ﺯﻥ ﺳﺎﻟﺨﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺩﺳﺖ ﭘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﭼﺮﻭﻙ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﻓﺴــﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﺮﻭ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺘﻪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻧﺮﻣﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺳﺪ:
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﻛﺠﺎ ﻫﺲ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ؟
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ ﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﺳﻤﺶ ﭼﻴﻪ؟
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ :ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ؟
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﻫﺎ ...
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻧﻤﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻓﺴﺮ ﺭﻭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ ...:ﺑﮕﻮ ،ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﺮﺳﻲ؟
ﺩﺧﺘﺮ :ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ...ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﺳﻤﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻪ.
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﭘﺸﺖ ﭘﻨﺠﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻨﺪﺩ.
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ :ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺳﻤﺶ ﭼﻴﻪ؟
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ :ﭼﻪ ﺑﮕﻢ ﻭﺍﷲ...
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ :ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ،ﻳﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻲ ﺑﮕﻮ ﺩﻳﮕﻪ.
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ :ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭼﻪ ،ﺍﺳﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ.
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ :ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻴﮕﻲ ،ﻋﺠﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷﻮﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻴﮕﻦ.
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻬﻤﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ :ﻣﺎ ﻋﺮﺑﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺳﻤﺶ ﻧﺨﻠﺴﺘﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻣﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﻧﺘﺮﺱ ،ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﮔﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺍﻭﻣﺪﻳﻢ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﭙﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻳﻢ.
ﺗﺸﻨﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ...
ﻭ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻣﻬﺮﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻧﺸﻴﻨﺪ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ.
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ :ﺳﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻩ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺑﺮﻳﻢ.
ﺍﻓﺴــﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﺑﻴﺎ ﺗﻮ ،ﻣﻦ ﺗﺸــﻨﻤﻪ .ﺧﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻳﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻜﺎﻥ ﭼﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻴﺪﻱ
ﺑﺨﻮﺭﻳﻢ؟
ﺳــﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻨﺠﺮﻩ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺭﺍﻫﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺍﻓﺴــﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻼﻫﺨﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺮ
ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻒ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻣﻴﺮﻩ.
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ :ﻫﻴﭻﺟﺎ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻨﺠﺎ ...
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ:
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ :ﺑﺎﺯﻡ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ.
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ :ﺁﺧﺮ ﺧﻂ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺠﻤﺎ ﻣﻴﮕﻦ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﺠﺎ .ﺍﻭﻧﻄﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﻪ
ﻫﻮﺭﻩ...ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﻴﻖ ﺗﻮ ﻣﻲﺩﻭﻧﻪ ﻫﻮﺭ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭼﻪ؟ ...ﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻩ ﺧﺐ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺗﻮ ﺍﮔﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﻭ ،ﺗﺎ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺧﺎﻙ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺑﻪ.
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﺟﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺍﻳﺴﺘﺪ ﭘﺎﻱ ﭘﻨﺠﺮﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻻﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﺎﻁ ﺟﻴﭗ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻲ ﺍﻭﻣﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ؟
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ :ﺳــﺮﺑﺎﺯ؟ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭﺯﺍ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﻳّﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺭﺩ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺗﺎ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﺧﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭘﺲ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ؟
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ :ﺟﻨﮕﻪ ،ﺗﻮ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻱ؟ ..ﻫﻤﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷــﺪ،
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﺗﻮ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻲ؟
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻢﺣﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ.
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ :ﺑﮕﻮ ،ﻳﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﺩﻳﮕﻪ ﺑﮕﻮ.
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ :ﺳﺮﺗﻔﻨﮕﺸﻪ ﺑﮕﻮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﻭﻧﻄﺮﻑ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺟﻮﺭ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻫﺴﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻋﺮﺑﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺠﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻴﻦ؟ ﻻﺑﺪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﻮﻧﺪﻩ.
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻏﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺍﻓﺴﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ
ﭘﻴـﺮﺯﻥ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ،ﺗﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻬﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻱ ﺳﺮ ﭘﺎ ،ﺧﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﮕﻴﺮ ﺑﺸﻴﻦ.
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ ﮔﻮﺷﻪ ﺳﻜﻮﻱ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻣﻲﻧﺸﻴﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻲ ﺣﺮﻑ ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﺯﻣﺎﻳﺪ،
ﺭﺍﺩﻳــﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﻃﺮ ﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ:
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﺑﻪ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻲ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻱ؟
ﻭ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻲ
ﺭﺍﺩﻳــﻮ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺟﻴــﻪ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺳــﺮﻳﻊ
ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ،ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺯﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻋﺮﺏ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ
ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ...
ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻴﻨﻲ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻜﺎﻥ ﭼﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﻍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﻴﺰ
ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺧﺸـﻢ ﻓﺮﻭ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﻜﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺮﺯﻩ
ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ .ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻜﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻴﺰ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ
ﻗﻨﺪ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﻗﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺲ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ.
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ :ﻗﻨﺪ ﺍﮔﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﻱ ﺧﺮﻣﺎ ﻫﺲ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﺦ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﻡ.
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻛﻼﻓﻪ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺭﻭﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ.
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ :ﺑﻴﺎ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻴﮕﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺎ؟ ﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﺣﺎﻻ ،ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻥ ﻣﻴﺠﻨﮕﻦ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﻴﮕﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﻤﺶ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺷﺮﻧﮓ،
ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ:
ﺍﻓﺴــﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﺍﻣﺸــﺐ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﻣﺤﻤﺮﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻣﻴﺸﻪ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﺠﻮﺭ ﺟﻠــﻮ ﺑﺮﻥ ،ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﻥ ﻣﻲﺷــﻪ ﻣﺮﺯ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ.
ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻋﻪ ﭼﺎﻱ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻟﺐ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺳﻮﺯﺩ.
ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻃﺎﻗﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺳﺎﻛﺖ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺧﺘﺮ :ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﺘﻮﻧﻪ ﮔﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻦ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻭﻣﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻤﻮﻧﻲ؟
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻙ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ،ﺑﺎﺗﺤﻘﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻡ ﻻﻏﺮﻭﭼﻬﺮﻩ
ﺑﺮﺍﻓﺮﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﺩﺧﺘﺮﺗﻪ؟
ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ :ﻧﻪ ،ﻧﻮﻩ ﻣﻪ.
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ :ﺑﺎ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻣﻮﻥ ﭼﻪ ﻓﺮﻗﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻩ.
ﺍﻓﺴــﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﻳﻪ ﻓﺮﻗــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻩ...ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻩ ﺗﻮ ﻣﺜــﻞ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻋﺮﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻑ
ﻧﻤﻲﺯﻧﻪ.
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ :ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ،ﺗﻮ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻤﻪ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﻫﺎ ،ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﺳﻮﺍﺩﻩ...ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭﺱ ﻣﻲﺩﻱ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺠﻤﻲ؟
ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﻱ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺍﻭ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ... :ﭘﺲ ﻧﻨﻪﺵ ﻛﻮ ،ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺵ ﻛﺠﺎﻥ؟
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ :ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ .ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺵ ﻛﺎﺳﺒﻪ ،ﺩﻛﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺗﻮ ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ.
ﺩﺧﺘﺮ :ﺍﻭﻝ ﮔﻔﺘﻲ ﺭﺍﻫﺘﻪ ﮔﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻱ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻲ ﺗﺸﻨﻪ ﺗﻪ ،ﺍﮔﻪ ﺍﻭﻣﺪﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺳــﺮ ﺩﺭﺑﻴﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻢ ،ﺍﻭﻧﻄﺮﻑ ﻫﻤﻪﺵ
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺑﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻄﺮﻑ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺷــﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻭﻧﻄﺮﻓﻢ ﻗﺸﻮﻧﺘﻮﻥ .ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮ ﻣﺤﺎﺻﺮﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺩﻩ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺟﺎ ﺑﻲﺧﺒﺮﻳﻢ ،ﺍﮔﻪ ﺗﺸﻨﻪ ﺗﻪ ﭼﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﻭ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﻜﺎﻥ ﭼﺎﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚﻧﻔﺲ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﺧﻴﺰﺩ.
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻮﺷﺪ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ :ﺳﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺎ ﺑﺮﻳﻢ.
ﺍﻓﺴــﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮕﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﻮﻥ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻳﻢ،
ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﻣﻌﻠــﻢ ...ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃــﺮ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﺤﻤﺮﻩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺷــﻤﺎ
ﺑﻲﺷﻌﻮﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ ﺑﺠﻨﮕﻴﻢ...
ﺩﺧﺘﺮ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻲ ﺍﻣﺸﺐ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻪ ،ﺍﺳﻤﺶ
ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮﻩ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺮﻩ .ﺗﻮ ﻣﺴﺘﻲ...
ﺍﻓﺴﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺳــﺨﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﻛﻮﺑﺪ.
ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺣﺎﻳﻞ ﻣﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻓﺴــﺮﻣﭻ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻭﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺸﺎﻥﻛﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ
ﻳﻮﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻭ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻨﺪﺍﻕ ﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪ
ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﮔﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻮﺑﺪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻴﺠﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻭ .ﺍﻓﺴــﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺗﻮﻱ ﺣﻴﺎﻁ ،ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻙ ﻭﺣﺸــﺖﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻳﺰﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﺩ .ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ ﻛﻒ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻏﻠﺖ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﭘﻴﺮﺯﻥ ﺟﻴﻎﻛﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺟﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﻭﺩ ...ﺳﮓ
ﭘﺎﺭﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ :ﺳﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﻭﻝ ﻛﻦ ،ﺑﻴﺎ ﺑﺮﻳﻢ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺟﻮﺍﻥ :ﭼﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺭ ،ﻣﻲﺭﻳﻢ …
71
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﺑﺎﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩﺷﺎﻟﻮﻳﻲ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻣﺮﻛﺰﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻧﺸﺪ
ﺳﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩﺷﺎﻟﻮﻳﻲﻗﺮﻳﺐﺩﻭﺳﺎﻝﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻣﺪﻳﺮﻣﺮﻛﺰﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻭﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺴـﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴـﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻛﺴﭙﻮﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ
ﻣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﮔﻨﺠﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﻮﺯﻩ ﻭ ...ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺷﺎﻟﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺴﻴﻨﻲﺭﺍﺩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪﻋﻨـﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺳـﻮﺍﻝ ،ﻧﻈﺮﺗـﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻴﺪ؟ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﻣﻦ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻲ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷــﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻢ ،ﺩﺭ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺗﻨﮕﺎﺗﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ
ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺻــﺎﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺠــﻢ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺣﺎﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻳــﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻛﻴﻔﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ
ﺳﻔﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﻣﻴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻛﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﻭ
ﺷﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺷﺪ ،ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺷﮕﺮﻓﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
72
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ
ﻣﻲﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ »ﺑﻲ ﻳﻨﺎﻝ ﻭﻧﻴﺰ« ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷــﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺣﻘﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺧﺠﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ
ﻻﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺁﺗﻲ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻭﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﺑﻨﮕﻼﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻛﺎ ،ﭘﻜﻦ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ...ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺛﻤﺮﺍﺕ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﺍﻟﺤﺴﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﺍﮔﺮﺏ
ﻭ ...ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ
ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺴـﺎﺏ ،ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻭﻳﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ
ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﮔﺴـﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺗﺠﺴـﻤﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ »ﺑﻲ ﻳﻨﺎﻝ ﻭﻧﻴﺰ«
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺴـﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻗﺒـﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣـﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻـﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ
ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟
ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ »ﺑﺎﺭﻻﺥ« ﻭ »ﻛﻠﻮﻳﺘﺲ«
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﭘــﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ
ﺍﺭﺯﺷــﻤﻨﺪ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﭘﺎ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ
ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ »ﮔﻮﺗﻪ« ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ
ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ.
ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﺑﺮﺳﺪ؟
ﻣــﺎ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻤــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺣﺪ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺳــﺮﻳﻊ ﺗﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺛﻤﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﺘﻮ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ
ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺳــﺮﻳﻊﺗﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﺑﺮﺳﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺗﻼﺵ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻠﻨﺪﻱ ،ژﺍﭘﻨﻲ ﻭ ...ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺯﺍﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ »ﺑﻲﻳﻨﺎﻝ ﻭﻧﻴﺰ«
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻣﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻣﺎﺑﻪﺍﺯﺍﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿـﺮ »ﺩﺑﻲ« ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺳـﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺩﺑﻲ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺗﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﺳــﺖ.
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺤــﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺑﻲ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ
ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻨــﺮ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ
ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ
ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﻛﺴــﭙﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﻭﻃﻠﺐ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺗـﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧـﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧـﺪ ﺭﺥ ﺩﻫـﺪ ،ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳـﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟
ﺧﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺰﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺑﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻨﺪﺭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺟﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻱ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨــﮓ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ،ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻲ ﻳﻨﺎﻝ ﻭﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺌﻮﻧﺎﺕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ
ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻏﺮﻓﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻋﺎﻟﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﻠﻮﺏﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩﺍﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﭘﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺑــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛــﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺁﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻈﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﺸــﺪﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨــﺮﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸــﻢ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻨــﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﻗــﻊ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻻﺍﻗﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﻭ ...ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻫﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﭘﺸﺘﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﭼﺘﺮ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻪ 200ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺗﺠﺴـﻤﻲ ﺍﻣﻀـﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻨﺮ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ.
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘـﺲ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﻲ ﺑـﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﺍﻣـﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻـﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑـﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ...ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﺪﻩ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﻛﻤﺮﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺧﻮﺷــﺤﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺳــﺮ ﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ،ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺜﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫــﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻠﻠﻲ
ﻋﻼﻭﻩﺑﺮ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﺳﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﻢ.
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺍﮔـﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺑﺎﺷـﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﺳـﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧـﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺎﻫﻢﺑﺎﺷﻤﺎﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﻴﻢﻛﻪﺩﺭﻫﺮﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲﻧﻴﺎﺯﺑﻪﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﺣﻴﺎ ﺷـﺪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣـﺎ ﻣﮕﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺧﺮﻳـﺪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷـﻴﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳـﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺷـﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓـﻲ ﮔﺎﻫـﻲ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨـﺪﺍﻥ ﻳﻜـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳـﻦ ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑـﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫـﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸـﻜﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻛـﺮﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳـﺖ؛ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻜﻲ ،ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺴــﭙﻮ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻻﺯﻡﺍﻻﺟﺮﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻪ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻣﻼﻙ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻛﺴــﭙﻮ ،ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻧﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ .ﺑﺎﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﺸﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﺩﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ
ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗــﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻣــﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻛﺴـﭙﻮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺷـﻜﻞ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻧﺎﻡ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ .ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻱ
ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺴﭙﻮﻱ ﻗﺰﻭﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻳﺒﻬﺸﺖ ﻣﺎﻩ 88ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ.
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﺪ ،ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺭﺍ »ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺧﺴﺮﻭﺟﺮﺩﻱ« ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻴﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺗﺼـﺪﻱ ﺑﻪﻋﻨـﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺩﻓﺘـﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺴــﭙﻮﻱ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﺰ 87ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﺳـﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺁﺷﺘﻲﺟﻮﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻟﻐﻮ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻻﺍﻗﻞ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؟
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﺷـﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻗﻬﺮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ؟
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼــﻮﻥ ﻣــﺎ ﻭﺿﻊﻛﻨﻨــﺪﻩ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻗﺎﻧــﻮﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺣﺖ ﻫﻨﺮ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭ ...ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻩ ﻟﻐﻮ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺸــﻮﺭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧــﻪﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫــﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻼﻱ ﻫﻨﺮ
ﻭ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﻡ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ،ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﺳﻬﻞ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺸﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺑﻠﻮﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣــﻲ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭ
ﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺑـﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣـﺎﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﺗـﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ
ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳـﺘﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ
ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻲ
ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﭼﻨﻴــﻦ ﺑﺮﻳﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﻃﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﺑﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ ،ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺎ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎ
ﻣﺎ ﻛﻔﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻫﺴــﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺩ
ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﺠﻴﺒﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺒﻼ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ،ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ،ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻃﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻭ...
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺻﺎﻑ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﻨﻔﻲﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺁﺛــﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺎﺑﻠﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ
ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧــﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ،
ﻋﺮﺿــﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﺳــﺨﺖﮔﻴﺮﻱﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺗﻌﺎﻭﻧﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻮﻳﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪﺩﺭﻧﻈﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﻣﺴﺎﻣﺤﻪﺑﻪﺧﺮﺝﺩﻫﻴﺪ،
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺪﺗﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﭽﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺑﻲ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ،ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺷــﻜﻞ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺯﻭﺩ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻮﺟﺒﺎﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣـﺪﺕ ﺩﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﺷـﺪ ،ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺌﻮﻧﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪ.
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴــﺪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺌﻮﻧﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻜﺎﺱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺣﻜﻤﻲ ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﻡ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻳﻚ
ﺳﻮءﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﮔﺎﻟﺮﻱ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﻮﺋﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﻭﺻﺮﻓﺎﺩﭼﺎﺭﻧﻮﻋﻲﺑﺪﺳﻠﻴﻘﮕﻲﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ
ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺮﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻊ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷﺪ.
ﭼﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
25ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺎﻳﻲ
ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻠﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺑﻲ ﻭ ...ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﺎ ﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﻫﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋــﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ
ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺁﺧﺮ ؟
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻛﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﮔﻨﺠﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﻲ ﻃﻲ ﻣﺪﺕ 70ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ 25ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺤﻞﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﺪﻭﻣﻮﺭﺩﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝﺑﻲﻧﻈﻴﺮ
ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺗﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﺘﺎﻗﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 88ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﭘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﺄﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﻃﻮﻝﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦﻣﻮﺯﻩﻳﻚﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﻧﻴﺰﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞﺁﻥﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞﺗﺎﺳﺎﻝﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺷﺪ.
73
ﻳﺎﺩﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖﻓﻌﻠﻲﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ...
ﻛﺎﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﺪﻝ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻋﻜﺎﺱ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻣﻲﺁﻣــﺪ .ﻗﻀﻴــﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳــﺎﺩﮔﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺨــﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﭘــﺎﻱ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺎﻟﺮﻱﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﮕﺮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷﻲ
ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ
ﻧﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﺎﻟﺮﻱﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﻛﺸﻒ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺁﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺟﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻜﻮﻱ
ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﻜﺴﻮﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺰ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺄﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻱﺷــﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺴﺮﺕ
ﺑﺮﮔﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ
ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻘﺶ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﺗﻨﮕﺎﺗﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
74
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻬﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﭘﺮﻭﻳــﺰ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﻟﻲ ،ﭘﺮﻭﻳﺰ
ﻛﻼﻧﺘﺮﻱ ،ﺁﻳﺪﻳﻦ ﺁﻏﺪﺍﺷــﻠﻮ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺭﺧﺸﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﺮﻳــﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ
ﺑﻬﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﻨﺠﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺛﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺭﻭﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﻻﺭ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ،
ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳــﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ
»ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻣﻮﺭ«» ،ﺍﻧﺪﻱ ﻭﺍﺭﻫــﻮﻝ« ﻭ ...ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﮔﻨﺠﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﻨﺠﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﺳــﺖ؛ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ
ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ »ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭﻙ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻌﻮﺭ
ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧــﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ« ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻲ
ﻲ
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ -ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﮔﺮﺍﻓﻴﺴﺖ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﺳﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ
ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺎﻟﺮﻱﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﻛﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ
ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺣﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ
ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻊﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺭﻭﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ
ﺩﺍﻣــﻦ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸــﻢ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺛﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ،
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻨﻲ ﺟﺰ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻛﺎﻏﺬﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺛﻤﺮﻱ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺮﻛــﺰ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ
»ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ« ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻏﺒﺖ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ
ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺑﺎﻻ
ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺷــﻜﻞ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﻃﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻭ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻰ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭼﭗ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻮﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﻧﻤﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ -ﺗﻤﺪﻧﻲ ﺯﺍﻳﺶ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ -ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ »ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ« ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ -ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ.
75
ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ
ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﻭﺭﺯﻱ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ
ﺳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻮﺭﻭﺯﻱ
-1ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺷــﮕﻔﺖﺁﻭﺭ ،ﭼﻪ ﺳﺪﻩﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴــﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴــﻦ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺖ ،ﺗﻄــﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ
ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﻚ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻌﺎﻥ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﺮﺏﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﺳﻴﺮﺍﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﭼﭗﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ
ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻝﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻴﻚ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺪﺭﺳــﺎﻻﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺤﻲ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺴﺨﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﻜﻮﻻﺭﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﻟﻮﺳﻜﻮﻧﻲ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭼﭗ ،ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻣﺘﻨﻲ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﭘﺎﺱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺛﺮﺍﺕ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﻭﺭﺯﻱ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺭ
ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺋﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﻣﻲﺁﺭﺍﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ »ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ« ﮔﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻲﻧﻬﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﺍﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺳﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ،
ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻏﺎﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻫﺪﻳﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﮕﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻓﺪ
ﻭ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻠﻌﺖ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﻣﻔﺘﺨﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻣﻲ،
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺍﮔﻤﺎﺗﺴﻴﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﺸﺤﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﻭﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻠﺴــﻠﻪﺟﻨﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﻡ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻲ
ﺧﻴﺮﻩﻛﻨﻨــﺪﻩ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺮﺩﺑﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺳــﭙﺲ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻓﻜﻨﺪ .ﻣﺴــﺘﻤﻌﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻀﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻧﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺭﻭﺭﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺧﻄﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﻴﻠﺴــﻮﻑ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻣﺪﺡ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻘﺒﺖ ﻓﺘﻮﺣﺎﺕ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﻧﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺸﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﮔﺸــﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﮕﻔﺘﻲ ،ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻓﻴﻠﺴــﻮﻑ ﺍﺯ »ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ« ﺳﺨﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺭﺍ
ﭘﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﺴﺘﻤﻊ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺮﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ
ﻏﺮﺏ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﭘﺮﺍﮔﻤﺎﺗﻴﺴﺖ
ﮔﺸــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻮﺷــﺰﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻏﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻧﮕﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺴﺎﻥ ﻟﻌﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻓﻀﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻮﺷﺰﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﻃﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻨﺦ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﮔﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﻳﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺏ »ﻧﻔﻊ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺮﻩ« ﻣﻄﻤﺢ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻳﺎ
»ﻋﻘﻞﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ« ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻩ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺳــﻨﺖ ﺑﻪ
76
»ﺍﺷﻌﺮﻱﮔﺮﻱ« ﻭ »ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ« ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺷﻴﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ »ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻱﮔﺮﻱ« ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
- 2ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﺎﻗﺺ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻓﻲﺍﻟﻤﺜﻞ »ﺣﺰﺏﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ« ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻦ ﭼﭗ ﺑﺮﻭﻥ
ﺗﺮﺍﻭﻳﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣــﺎﻥ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﭼﭗﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻢﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻒ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﺮﻟﻮﺳﻜﻮﻧﻲ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻲ ﭘﺸﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺁﺯﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ
ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻡ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺳﻮﺍﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ -ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲﺍﺵ ﻓﺎﺵ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ
»ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ« ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻫﻤﺖ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺳــﺘﺨﻮﺵ ﻫﺠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﻟﻮﺳﻜﻮﻧﻲ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ،
ﭼﭗﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﻼﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻓﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﻨﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻧﻬﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻔﻮﻕ ﻣﻨﺤﻂﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﭘﺮﺍﮔﻤﺎﺗﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻲ -ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺑﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﭼﭗﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ »ﭼﭗ« ﻭ »ﺭﺍﺳﺖ« ﺟﺰ ﻧﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺟﺎ
ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺍﮔﻤﺎﺗﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻣﻲﻧﻮﺭﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺳﺴﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻥ
ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺑﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻃﻠﺒﺪ ،ﺳﺒﻚﺑﺎﺭﻱﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻳــﺪ ﻭ ﻻﺟﺮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﺍﺻﻮﻝ« ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﻮﻻﺗﻲ ﺩﺳﺖﻭﭘﺎﮔﻴﺮ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺧﻼﺻﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺧﻼﺻﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺷﮕﻔﺘﺎ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﭘﺎﺩﺯﻫﺮ ﺳﻤﻮﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﻮﻥ »ﺳﻢ«
ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺳﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﺗﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺯ
ﻧﻔﻊ ﻭ ﻳﻜﺠﺎﻧﺒﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺗﻘﻠﻴــﻞ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻖ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﻣﻨﻜﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺎﻟﻴﻒ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷﻲ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ.
- 3ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺎ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﻃﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺻﻔﺖ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻄﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭼﭗﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻃﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻭﺭﺯ
ﺗﺎ ﭼﺮﻳﻚ ﻓﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﻠﺤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﻢﺷــﺎﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺭﺳﻢﺷــﺎﻥ .ﻣﺮﺍﻡ ﭼﭗ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ
ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﺣﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﻟﻨﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﻳﻴﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﻣﻼﻥﺍﺵ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﺍﻱ
ﺧﺰﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺎﺯﮔﻮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﻜﻮﻻﺭﻳﺴﻢ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﺳﻴﻮﻧﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ »ﻣﺴﻠﻜﻲ ﻣﻠﻲ« ﻧﺸﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺘﻦ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻡ ﻧﺎﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻴﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﭼﺮﺧﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﻼﻡﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺍﺳﻼﻡﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺎﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ
ﻣﺎ ﭼﭗ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻧﺪ.
ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﻚ ﻣﻲﺳﺮﻭﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺣﺠﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﺍﻣﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺳﺮﺩﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ،ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻠﺴــﻠﻪﺟﻨﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑــﺎﺯﺍﺭ ،ﻣﻮﺗﻠﻔﻪ .ﺟﺪﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ
ﻣﺴﻠﻚ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﺎﻡﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 60
ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶﻫــﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﻤﻠﻜــﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺭﻕ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ .ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﭼﭗ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ،ﭼﭗﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ
ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻱ .ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺯﺍﺩﻩ
ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻗﺮﺍﺑﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭼﭗ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﻚ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﮕﻔﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺮﺍﮔﻤﺎﺗﻴﺴﻢ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺣﺴﺐ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 88ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﻱ
ﻧﺎﻫﻤﮕﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻇﻬﻮﺭ
ﭘﻮﭘﻮﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ ﭼﭗﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ،ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ
ﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺍﮔﻤﺎﺗﻴﺴﻢ ﻧﺸﻮﻳﻢ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻼﺡ ﻭ ﺻﻼﺡ
ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻼﻙ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺣﺴﺐ »ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ« ﺍﺯ »ﺧﻮﺩ« ﺳﺨﻦ
ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑــﻪ »ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ« ﻧﻈــﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ» .ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻴﻪ« ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ،ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﻲ،
ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻫﻞ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻖ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﭘﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻜﺎﻟﻴﻒ ﺩﻳﻨــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺝ ﻣﻲﻧﻬﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﻩﮔﺮ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﻃﻨﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻧﻬﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺯﻭﺩﮔﺬﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻼﻙ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺒﻌﺚ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺍﻱ ﺣﻜﻴﻢ ﺑﻲﺑﺪﻳﻞ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﻣﺎ ،ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨﻲ)ﺭﻩ( ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺻﺪﺭﺍﻳﻲﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﻭﻥ ﺗﺮﺍﻭﻳﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﮔﻮﺷﺰﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﻚ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ
ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ »ﺍﺻﻮﻝ« ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ »ﺍﺻﻼﺡ« ﺳﺨﻦ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺳﻮﻣﻲ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ
ﺧﻴﻤﻪ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ»: ،ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﻪ«.
ﻣﺮﺍﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ »ﺣﻖ« ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ »ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ« ،ﻫﻢ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺟﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ »ﻣﻠﺖ« ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﻧﺸﻮ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻭ ﺍﺭﺝ ﻧﻬــﺎﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﻣﺪﻧــﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﻠﻚ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
»ﺗﺠﺪﺩ« ﻭ »ﺗﻌﻬﺪ« ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ
»ﺗﺠﺪﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ« ﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻧﻴﻚ ﻛﺎﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻼﺡ ﻭ ﺻﻼﺡ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺷﻮﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻛﻬﻦ
ﻻﻟﻪ ﺭﺷﻴﺪﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺪﻩ ﻫﺠﺪﻫﻢ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺳﻠﻄﻪ ﺭژﻳﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﻛﻬﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭژﻳﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻬﻦ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ
ﺣﻖ ﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺳــﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻓﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ
ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻘﺎﻳﺎﻯ ﻗﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﺳﻄﻰ ﻣﺤﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺍﺷــﺮﺍﻓﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻰ ﻗﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﺳﻄﻰ،
ﺑﻮﺭژﻭﺍﺯﻯ ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻣﻰ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺳﺮ ﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﭘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭﺍژﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻟﻐﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ،
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍژﮔﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ »ﭼﭗ« ﻭ »ﺭﺍﺳﺖ« ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺍﺳﺖ.
***
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ،1789ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﻛﻬﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻖﺍﻟﻬﻰ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻛﻪ» ﻟﻮﻳﻰ« ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﺧﺪﺍ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﻭﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻓﻰ ،ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﻬﻦ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ
ﻭ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﻣﻤﺘﺎﺯ ﺑﻪﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ
ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺪﻩ
ﭘﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1787ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﺳﻄﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻟﻮﻳﻰ ﺷﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﺳــﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺷــﺮﺍﻑ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺧﺸﻤﮕﻴﻦ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ،1787ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ» ،ﻣﺠﻠــﺲ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻭﻯ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻃﺮﺡ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ»ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻰ«
ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1614ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻟﻮﻳﻰ ﺳــﻴﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻟﻮﻳﻰ ﺷﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺿﻤﻨﻰ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﺶ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭﻯ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺟﺴﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻣﻪ 1788ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﺟﺴــﺘﻪ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ
ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺷﺪ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺷــﺮﺍﻑ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺟﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳــﭙﺘﺎﻣﺒﺮ 1788ﺍﺷــﺮﺍﻑ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﮔﺸﻮﺩ.
ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﻪ 1789ﺷﺎﻩ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮ ﺳﻨﺖ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﻔﻪﺍﻯ ﺳﻪ ﺳــﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﺍﺕ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ
ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﻨﺖ ،ﻫﺮ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻳــﺶ ﺭﺍﻯﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺳــﭙﺲ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻳﻚﺟﺎ ﺟﻤﻊ
ﻣﻰﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺭﺍ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺳﻮﻡ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﺟﺎ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍﻯﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ،
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺷــﺮﺍﻑ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﺭﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﻴﺰﻧﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﭘﺎﺭﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﺷﻮﺭﻳﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﭘﺮﺁﺷﻮﺏ ،ﺩﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﻳﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻤﻰﺑﺮﺩ .ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ژﻭﺋﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ
ﺷﺪ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﻨﺎﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ 17ژﻭﺋﻦ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻠﻰ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻧﺪ.
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻝ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻠﻰ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ژﻭﺋﻦ 1789ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ
ﮔﺮﺳﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﺮ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺷﻚ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺷــﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻰ ﺧــﻮﺩ »ژﺍﻙ ﻧﻜﺮ« ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺗﻦ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺷــﺎﻩ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻣــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮ
ﻣﻰﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺁﺷﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﺮﻛﺶ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺎﺳﺘﻴﻞ ﻫﺠﻮﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻟﻮﻳﻰ ﺷﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺎﭼــﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺍﺿﻰ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﮔﺮﺳــﻨﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻠــﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻠﻮﻛﺎﻧﻪ
ﻭ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﻭﺕ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﻬﻨﻪ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻰ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭ
ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ 26ﺍﻭﺕ 1789ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ
ﺍﻭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸــﺮ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺁﺷــﻮﺏ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﻤﻮﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻡ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ
ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﺮ ﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺳــﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺷﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻒﺁﺭﺍﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﻲﻧﺸﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻤﺖ ﭼﭗ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺭﻭﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ
ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻲﻧﺸﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺑﺮﺁﺷﻔﺘﻦ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻃﻐﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺿﺪ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺧﺸﻢ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺮﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻴﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻣﻠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻄﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ
ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺷﺖ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﻌﻠﻘﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺎﺡﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﺧﻂ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺷﺪ.
ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ،ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈــﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻰ
ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﺟﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻭﺭﺳﺎﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻩﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻰﻧﺸﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﭼﭗ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻫــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻰﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ
ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺿﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧــﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺳﻂ ﻣﻰﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺭﻭ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﻰ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ
ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ.
ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺳــﺮﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻈﻴﺮ
ﭼﭗ ،ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺭﻭ ﺷــﺪ .ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ
ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮ ﮔﺮﺩ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺷﮕﺎﻩ »ژﺍﻛﻮﺑﻦﻫﺎ« ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ »ﺭﻭﺑﺴﭙﻴﺮ« ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻣﺪﺍﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺭﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﺷﺪ.
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﺷــﺮﺡ ﻣﻔﺼﻠﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻝ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻨﺠــﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻭﺍژﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻮﭼﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍژﻩ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺟــﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ »ﭼﭗ« ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨــﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ
ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻭﺍژﻩ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﭼﭗ
ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻝ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺎﺳــﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ
ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻰ ،ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺗــﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻭﺍژﻩ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪ؛ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﭼﭗ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺰﺏ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ،ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﭼﭗ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻳﻜﻰ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ
ﻭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ،ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﻧﺎﻣﻨﺪ.
77
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺎﻥﻣﻬﺮ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻰ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺳﻮﻡ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥ
»ﭼـﭗ« ﻭ »ﺭﺍﺳـﺖ« ﭘﻴـﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼـﺎﺩ ﺣﻀـﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻤـﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻳﻚ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸـﻪﺍﻯ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺷـﺎﻳﺎﻥﻣﻬﺮ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ
ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﻭ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ
ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﺠﺎﺳـﺖ .ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻯ
ﺷﻤﺎﺳﺖ.
***
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ،
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ»ﭼﭗ«ﻭ»ﺭﺍﺳﺖ«ﭼﻪﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰﺑﻪﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷـﺪ؟ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ،ﺣﺎﻣﻞ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎﺗﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؟
»ﭼﭗ« ﻭ »ﺭﺍﺳﺖ« ،ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺗﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴــﺘﻰ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺮﻧﺎﺳــﻴﻮﻧﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷــﻜﻞ
ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ 1986ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻰ ﺍﺯ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻯ ،ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴــﻚ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ 1986ﻛــﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﭼﭗ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺪ ،ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﻓﺸﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻨﻰ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﭼﭗ
ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 1986ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻟﻐﺖ ،ﻣﺤﺎﻓــﻞ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻯ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎ.
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳـﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟
78
ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ،ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻥ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﻰ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﻰﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ
ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﭘﺮﻳﺸــﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻳﺸــﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻴﻢ .ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻳﺸﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ
ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔــﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥﻃــﺮﻑ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻳﺎ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻯ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ،
ﺑﻰﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻣﭙﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻻﺯﻡ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.
ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺣﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺪﻋـﻰ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﮕـﻮﻯ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺣﺖ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺣﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﭘﺬﻳــﺮﺵ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻭ
ﻋﺪﻡ ﭘﺬﻳــﺮﺵ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﻛــﻪ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﺠــﺎﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳــﺰﻯ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻣﻨﺒﻌﺚ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﭗ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺳــﺮﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻳﻨﻪ
ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺤﺜﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻭﺳﻴﻌﻰ ﺻﻴﺎﻧﺖ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎ
ﺣﺪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻠﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺳــﻮﻡ
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻭ ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﺮﺍﻧﺘﺰ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺣــﺮﻑ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ،
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺰﺋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺻﺪﺳـﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴـﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺗﺤـﻮﻻﺕ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻨـﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳـﺖ
ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴـﻢ؛ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﻋﻼﻣﻴـﻪ ﻓﻴﻼﺩﻟﻔﻴـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 1930
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻗـﺐ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭ
ﺣـﻖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛـﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﭼﭗﻫﺎﺳـﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﺳـﻤﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻨﺰﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺪﻳـﻞ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﭼﻴﻨﻰ
ﻭ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺘﻰ .ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ
ﻭ ﺩﮔﺮﺩﻳﺴﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻋﻠﺖﺍﻟﻌﻠﻞ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﺤﺚ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ
ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧــﺪ ،ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺳــﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ،ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺧﻮﺍﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺹ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ
ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳــﻰ ،ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣﺰﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭘﻼﺗﻔﺮﻡﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫــﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳــﺎﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻰﻣﺤﺎﺑﺎ ﺭﻫﺎ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺖ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪﺍﻯ
ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺖ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ،ﺭﻭﻯﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ
ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺪﻯ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺧﻄﺮﺁﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻠﺘﺴﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﺩﺑﻴﺮ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺪﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼـﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭﺗﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻠﻮﻙ ﭼﭗ ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻳﻠﺘﺴـﻴﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺳـﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺣـﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻝ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﺎﻣﻰ ﺟﺰ ﻣﺎﻓﻴﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻰﺷـﻮﺩ .ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻓﺎﺯ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ،ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ؟
ﻋﺪﻡ ﮔﺸــﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺖ ﻛﺎﻻﻫــﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﺠﺎﺕﻛﻪﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝﺍﻳﻦﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯﺍﺳﺖﺑﻪﺭﺍﺳﺖﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ.ﻧﻈﺎﻡﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰﺩﺭﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ
ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺑﺎﻻﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻭ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺶﺭﻭﻳﺶ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺮﻭﺝ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻋﻜﺲﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺧﺎﺭﺝﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺷــﻤﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑــﻞ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﭘﺸﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺛــﺮﻭﺕ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺧﻼﻗﻴــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻠﻮﻛﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻄﻦ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺨﺘﻰﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻗﺸﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﻌـﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻠـﻮﻙ ﭼﭗ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ،
ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰﺳـﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻀﻼﺕ ﻣﺤﻴﻂﺯﻳﺴـﺘﻰ
ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻛﺶ ﺧﺎﻟﻰ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺗﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ
ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﻼﻓﺼﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﻣﻰﺷـﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺿﺪﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺳـﺎﺯﻯ ﻳﺎ ﺣﻔﻆ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺟﻤﺎﻫﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺯﻳﺴﺖ .ﻳﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﺑﺨﺶ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﺡ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ؟
ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞﻫﺎ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﭼﭗ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻧﻮﻉ ﭼﻴﻨﻰ ﺧﻂ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺭﻭﺳﻰ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ،ﺿﺪﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻯ ﻻﺗﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻘﺶﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻰ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻳﺎ
ﺭﻭﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻯ
ﺭﺥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﺑﺨــﺶ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ،ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺗﻦ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠــﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ،ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺩﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﮕﺸﺎﻳﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻠﻮﻙ ﺷﺮﻕ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺟﻤﺎﻫﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻫﻢ...
ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﻜﺎﻫﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻰ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﻓﺘﻴﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻗﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺭﻭﺳﻰ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻴﻨﻰ .ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻜﺜﺮﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻬﻨﻪ
ﺭﺥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭﻓﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﻳــﻢ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺒﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﺮﭼﻢ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺳﺒﺰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻳﻪ
ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻯ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡﺷﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﻤﺎﻟﻰ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1986ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻰ ﺭﺥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺜﺮﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﻮﺟــﻮﺩ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻴــﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺸــﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻋﺎﺩﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ
ﺑﻠﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟـﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﻫﺮ ﻛـﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ
ﺍﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﭼﺸﻤﮕﻴﺮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؟ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻮﻻﺑﺸﺮﺩﺭﻃﻮﻝﻗﺮﻭﻥﻣﺘﻤﺎﺩﻯﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻰﺭﺍﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫــﺎﻯ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻭ ﻏﺮﻳﺒــﻰ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ،ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡﺑﻪﺣﻘﻮﻕﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥﻭﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ.ﺣﺘﻰﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ
ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤــﻞ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻇﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻡ ﺷﻤﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ،ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻭﺗﺤﻮﻝﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺟﺪﻯﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ
ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ
ﻭ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﺧﻮﺍﻫﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﭘﺮﻭﺳﺘﺮﻭﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ
ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﻫﻢ
ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ
ﮔﻼﺳﻨﻮﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﺭﺥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻧﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﺗﺤـﺎﺩ ﺟﻤﺎﻫﻴﺮ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ
ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻯ ﻓﺸـﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﺴــﻴﻂﺗﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ
ﻣﻰﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳــﻚ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺳــﺮﺩﺭﮔﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣــﻮﺯﻩ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺴﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﺎ ﻭ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻗﺒﻠﻰﺍﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﻣﺪﻝ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻚﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺟﺎﻯ
ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﻼﺳــﻔﻪ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺩﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻼﺷﻨﺪ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﺭﺍﺋــﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭘﺴـﺖﻣﺪﺭﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻛﻼﻥﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺳﭙﺮﻯ
ﺷـﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻛﻼﻥﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭﺟـﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺳﻮﻣﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ
ﺑـﺎ ﺩﺭﺱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘـﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﻣﻰﺗـﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺳـﺖﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟـﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻄﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﭙﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺴﺖﻣﺪﺭﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﺶ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﺪ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺷﻤﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻭ
ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺍﺏﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ
ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳــﺦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﻭ ﻓﻰﺍﻟﺒﺪﺍﻫــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑــﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﺴﺖﻣﺪﺭﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ
ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﺸــﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻪﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﮕﺎﻧﺶ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﺍﺷــﺨﺎﺹ ،ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﻭ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳــﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻯ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﺴﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﭘﺴﺖﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺋﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ.
ﻣﺎﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻴﺖﺻﺤﺒﺖﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢﻭﺷـﻤﺎﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪﻛﻪﻗﺎﺋﻞ
ﺑﻪﻧﮕﺎﻩﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻫﺴـﺘﻴﺪ.ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺑﺎﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻔﻜﺎﻙ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ
ﻫﺴـﺘﻴﻢ .ﺭﺍﺳـﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻴﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﻘـﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨـﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﻠﻴﺖﻧﻴﺰﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪﻭﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻥﺍﻳﻦﺩﻭﻋﻨﺼﺮﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻴﺖﻭﻛﻠﻴﺖﺑﺎﻳﺪﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻛﺮﺩﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻰﻛﻪﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻰﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻴﺖﺭﺍﺩﺭﻛﻨﺎﺭﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺖﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪﻭﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﺑﻪﺣﺮﻛﺖﺧﻮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺘﻪﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴـﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ،ﻛﺪﺍﻡﻳﻚﺍﺯﺍﻳﻦﺩﻭﻧﮕﺎﻩﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪﻛﺎﺭﮔﺸﺎﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ،ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ،
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﭘﺲ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻛﻞﻧﮕﺮ
ﭘﺸﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻥ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺣﻜﻤﻔﺮﻣﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻳﻜﻰ
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺗﻜﺜﺮ ﺑــﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺘﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻤﺐ ﺑﺮ
ﺳــﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺭﻳﺰﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ،ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻫﺮﺩﻭﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻰ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺭﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﻫﺎ ﺗﻜﺜﺮﮔﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺳــﻨﺘﻰﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﺗﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻰ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﺎﻗﺺ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﭼﭗ ﻭ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺘﺎﺭﻳﺴﻢ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮﺩﻭ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﻞﻧﮕﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺋﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
79
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﻰ
ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ!
ﺭﺿﺎ ﺭﺍﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺍژﻩ »ﭼﭗ« ﻭ »ﺭﺍﺳﺖ« ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ،ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﺑﻮﺭژﻭﺍ-ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻫﺠﺪﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1789ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺷــﺪ ،ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﻭ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﻰ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ )ژﻳﺮﻭﻧﺪﻳﻦﻫﺎ( ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺭﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻣﻰﻧﺸﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳــﺮﻧﮕﻮﻧﻰ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻛﻬﻦ )ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻰ،
ﺁﺭﻳﺴﺘﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳــﻰ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟــﻰ( ﻭ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﻳﻚ
ﺟﻤﻬــﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﺴــﺎﻭﺍﺕﻃﻠﺐ )ژﺍﻛﻮﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎ( ﺩﺭ ﻃــﺮﻑ ﭼﭗ ﺟﺎﻯ
ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨــﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭘــﺲ» ،ﭼــﭗ« ﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﻫــﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺭﻳﺸﻪﺍﻯ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ )ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ( ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ
»ﺭﺍﺳﺖ« ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺁﻥ
ﻳﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻰ،
ﺟﻨﺴــﻴﺘﻰ ،ﻧﮋﺍﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ .ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺩﻳــﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﭼﭗ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ:
ﺧﺼﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻣﻴﺴﺮ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺧﺼﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﻭﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺎ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﺖﺑﺎ ﺑﻮﺭژﻭﺍﺯﻯ
ﺧﺼﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻣﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻭ ﺁﺩﺍﺏ ﻭ ﺳﻠﻮﻙ ﺁﻥ
ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻃﺒﻘــﻪ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ،ﺑــﺪﻭﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂﻭﻟﻲ ﻧﻌﻤﺘﻰ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭﺭﺍﺛﺖ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻳﺎﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻭﻓﺎﻕ ﻋﺎﻡ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ )ﻳﺎ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ( ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﻝ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔــﺮ ﺭﺑــﻂ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻯ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﺮﻗﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻓــﺮﻡ ﺻﻮﺭﺕﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﻣﺴﺎﻭﺍﺕﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺿﺪﻧﺎﺳﻴﻮﻧﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺮﻧﺎﺳﻴﻮﻧﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﻣــﻪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺭﻫﻴﺎﻓﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻲ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﭼﭗ ،ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﭼﭗ ﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻚ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻟﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﭗ ﻧﻮ ﺍﻫﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺭﺯﻳﻢ.
ﺟﻬﺎﻥﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﭼﭗ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻚ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻪ ﺟﺰءﺍﺻﻠﻰ
ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ .ﺑﻴﻨﺶ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻰ ﭼﭗ ﻣﺘﻜﻰ ﺑﺮ
80
ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺟﺰء ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻰ ﭼﭗ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻓﺮﻋﻰ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ :ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ .ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺑﻴﻨﺸــﻰ
ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺪﻯ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺻﺤﻪ
ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ،ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺴــﺘﻦ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﻧﮕﺮﺵ
ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨــﻰ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴــﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻜﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ
ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﻝ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺩﺭﻳــﺶ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻭ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻫﺴﺘﻰ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺷﻌﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ -ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ،ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ،ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ،ﻫﻨﺮ ،ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻯ ،ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻭ
ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ.
ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻫﺴﺘﻰ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺷﻌﻮﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﺯﻳﺮﺑﻨﺎ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺑﻨﺎ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﻄﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ،ﺭﺷــﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﻮﻟﺪ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻳــﺎ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺷﻜﻞﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﻧﻌﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﭼﭗ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﺎ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﺳﻨﺠﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻻﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ
ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺴــﻤﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﻻﻯ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻭ
ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﺍﻗﺸــﺎﺭ ﻭﺳﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻣﺰﺩﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻴﺸﺎﻥ
ﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ،ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺰﺩﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺪﮔﻰ
ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗــﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ
ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎ ،ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﻳﻮﻍ ﺑﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻱ ﻫﮕﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻏــﺎﺯﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼــﭗ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ .ﻫﺪﻑ ﻫﮕﻞ ﺁﺷﺘﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﺳﻮﻳﻰ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ )ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻪ
ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺑﺎ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ )ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺮ ﻋﻘﻞ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ( ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﮕﻞ ،ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﭼــﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈــﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﻥﻫﺎ ﺗﺠﻠﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻫﮕﻞ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻛﻠﻴﺘﻰ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻳﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻋﻤﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻫﮕﻞ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﺮﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻫــﮕﻞ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺗﻼﻗﻰ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻞ
ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ »ﻭﺿﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ« ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﮕﻞ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻭ
ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﮕﻞ ،ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﻧﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﮕﻠﻰ ﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻫﮕﻞ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﻋﻘﻞ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﺷﺘﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻣﺪﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻯ ﻛﻠــﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻣﺪﻧﻰ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ »ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺟﺎﺕ« ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﮕﻞ ،ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ »ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ«
) (Sittlichkeitﺗﻮﺻﻴــﻒ ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﺪ .ﺍﺧــﻼﻕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ »ﺣﻖﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻰ« ﻭ »ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ« ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻖ ﺑﻪ
ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﺤﻘﻖﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻨﺰﻟﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺣﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻭ ﻭﺍﭘﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺣﻖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻫﮕﻞ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺗﺤﻘﻖﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﮕﻞ،
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻰ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ـ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻰﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﺑﺪﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻫﮕﻞ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻗﻮﻝ ﻫﺎﻳﺪﮔﺮ ،ﻫﮕﻞ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ ﺫﻫﻨﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ.
ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻓﻮﺋﺮﺑﺎﺥ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻭ ﻫﮕﻞﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ
ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﭼﭗ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
»ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ« ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺖ .ﻓﻮﺋﺮﺑﺎﺥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ 1841ﭼﺎپ ﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻫﮕﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻧﻈﺮﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻣﺠﺮﺩ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻳﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻭﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ )ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﻲ( ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪ ﺩﺭﻫﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﻭﺍژﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﺁﻥ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﮕﻞ ،ﺟﻮﻫﺮ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻼﻳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳــﺎﺯﺩ .ﻓﻮﺋﺮﺑﺎﺥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍژﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﺷــﻜﻞﻭﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ،ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻭﻱ،
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻓﻮﺋﺮﺑﺎﺥ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺴﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ،ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺟﺎﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ« ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ 1843
ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ ـ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ،ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ
ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻓﺌﻮﺩﺍﻟﻲ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ »ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﻘﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﻘﻖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﻳﮋﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ
ﭘﺲﭘــﺮﺩﻩ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ« .ﻣﺎﺭﻛــﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ
ﺩﺭ ِ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻝ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺑﺸﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ
ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ« .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺍژﮔﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؛
»ﻛﻞ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻃﺮﺡ ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ
ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﻮﺋﺮﺑﺎﺥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ«.
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﮕﻞ ،ﻫﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﻫﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍژﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺳــﺖﻛﻢ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻝﺑﻨﺪﻱ
ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺛﻨﻮﻳﺖ ﻫﮕﻠﻲ »ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ« ﻭ »ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ« ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﻗﺎﻟﺐﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺗﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ،ﻭﺍژﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺛﻨﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻼﺵ
ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻋﺎﻣﻼﻥ ﺍﻧﻀﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻱ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻫﮕﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﻭﻧﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻓﺰﺍﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﺍﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ »ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ« ﻭ »ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ« ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻼﻗﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ :ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ.
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺑﻪﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﺲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺁﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺍﻭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ
ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﻫﮕﻞ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﺘﻰ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ
»ﻫﺴﺘﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ« ﺭﺍ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻫﮕﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻓﺤﻮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻣﺎﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﻣﺘﻮﻥ ﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻚ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﺳــﺎﻃﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺲ ،ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺘﺎﺧــﺮ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ـ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﺼﻴﺐ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧــﻰ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋــﻪ ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﻤﺘــﺮ
»ﺟﺒﺮﻯ-ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ« ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ »ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ -ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻰ« ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺑــﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑــﺮ ﻧﻘــﺶ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻙ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸــﻒ
»ﺩﺳﺖﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻰ« ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺩﺭ 1932
ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻣﻜﺘــﺐ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻛﻮﻧﻮﻣﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ
ﭘﺮﻭﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺎﻧﻴﺴــﻢ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻔﻰ ﺩﺗﺮﻣﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ.
ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﭼﭗ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭ ﻣﺤﺮﻙ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ
ﻗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷــﺪ .ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻠــﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﻭﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﻰﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ،ﺳﻴﺎﻫﺎﻥ
ﻭ ...ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ﻋﺎﻣــﻞ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ
ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭﺝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﻪ 1968
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﭼﭗ ﻧﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻯ
ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻥ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻫﻤﭽــﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴــﻰ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻴــﺪ ﺧﺎﻧــﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻳﺮ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔﺸﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ
ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ .ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺧﺼﻴﺼﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﺷــﻜﻨﻰﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻜﻔﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔــﺮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﻫﻤﻴــﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺁﺩﻭﺭﻧﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺭﻛﻬﺎﻳﻤﺮ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ
ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻯ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥﺷﻤﻮﻝ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ
ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ،ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺟﺎﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ
ﮔﺮﻓــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺘﺬﻛﺮ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﭗ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﺍﻳﺶ ﻧﻈﻢ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻫﻞ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻫﻮﻳﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻪ ﭘﺲ ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺁﻟﺘﺮﻧﺎﺗﻴﻮ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻻ ﻋﻴﻮﺏ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺗﻠﺦ »ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ« ﻧﻤﻰﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻳﻮﺗﻮﭘﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻛﺠﺎﺁﺑﺎﺩﻯ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؟
81
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﭼﭗ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ
ﺗﺎ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﺴــﻮﻓﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ،ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻞ
ﻣﻨﻈﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ .ﺑﻪﺯﻋﻢ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺪﻳــﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺤﻞ ﺗﺠﻠﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﺩﺍﻳﻢ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻲ -ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧــﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ
ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺣﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ.
ﻭ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ -ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﺳﻤﻴﺖﺍﺯ»ﺛﺮﻭﺕﻭﻣﻠﻞ«ﻳﻚﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﺍﻱﻣﻲﭘﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﻠﻲﻳﺎﻓﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ
ﺷــﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﮕﺮﻱ ،ﻧﻬﻀﺘﻲ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻔﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﻴﺎﺣﺎﻥ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻲ -ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﺵ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﻡ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫــﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ »ﻣﮕﻨﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺳــﺎﻱ« ﺍﺳــﻤﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺍﺳﻜﻮﻻﺳــﺘﻴﻚ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﻥ ﺷﺪ» .ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻼ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻜﻠﻒ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ،ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺭﺍﻫﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺷﻤﺮﺩ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳــﻒ ﻓﺮﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧــﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻃﻠﺐﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺁﻥ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻋﺮﻓﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ« .
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺑﻪﺯﻋﻢ ﻭﺑﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻟﻮﻳﻨﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﻓﻜﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺷﻜﻮﻫﻤﻨﺪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﻲﻭﻗﻔﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻢ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1750ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺳﻮﺩﭘﺮﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺬﻣﻮﻡ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺸﻮﻳﻖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻄﻔﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﺪﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺴــﺨﻴﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺩﻳﻮﻳــﺪ ﻻﻳﻮﻥ ،ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﻫﻤﺰﺍﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ
ﺍﺳــﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺣﻴﺎﺗــﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪ ﺻﻨﻌﺘــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺎﺑﺮﻣﺎﺱ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺳﻮﺩﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ.
ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ.
»ﺍﺳــﻤﻴﺖ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺎﺻــﻞ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺩﻭ ﺳــﻮﻳﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﭙﻴﺪﻩ ﺩﻡ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺁﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﻤﻴﺖ ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﻤﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻭ ﺭﻳﻜﺎﺭﺩﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺳﻮﺩﺍﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ »ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ«ﻫﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻳﺨﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺳﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺗﻨﮓﻧﻈﺮﺍﻧــﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺍﻥ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﺳــﻮﺩﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺨﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢﮔﺮ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪ .ﻣﺎﺯﺍﺩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﻧﺎﻣﺮﺋﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻓــﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺼﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺰﺍﻧﻪ »ﺳﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﻴﻤﺘﻲ« ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ
ﺑﭽﺮﺧﺎﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳــﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺟــﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ« .
ﺧﻮﺩﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻜﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﺣﺼﻞ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﻜﺎﺭﺩﻭ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﻤﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ »ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ« ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻓﻘــﻲ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺪﻧــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻚ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻓﻄﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻳﻜﺎﺭﺩﻭ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻥ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﺎﻣﺮﺋﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻭ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ
ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺗﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺷــﺶ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﺎﺭﺷﻴﺴﺘﻢﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺭﻳﻜﺎﺭﺩﻭ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺟﺴــﺖ» .ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ
ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺪﻧــﻲ ﻫﻤﭽــﻮﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﺭﻳــﻜﺎﺭﺩﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﻲﺭﻭﺡ ،ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ
ﭘــﻮﻝ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ
ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ،ﭘﻴــﻜﺎﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺿــﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻭ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺧﻮﺩﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﻣﺪﻧــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻗﺮﻭﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺰﺍﻉ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ .ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﺳﻤﻴﺖ
ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ
ﺳــﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ«.ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ،
ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻳﻨﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻳﻨﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ ،ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻲ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﻫﺮﺑﺮﺕ ﺍﺳﭙﻨﺴــﺮ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ
ﺗﻀﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻔــﻆ ﻭﺿﻌﻴــﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻓﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻓﺘﻲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ
82
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻓﻆ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺟﻨﺒﺸﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺳﺮﻧﺰﺍﻉ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺩﮔﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺣــﻞ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ،ﺟﻨﺒﺶ
ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﺷﻜﻨﻲ ﻧﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻜﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺮ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺣﻘﺎﻕ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﺍﺯ 18ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ 12ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ
ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ.ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺵﻫﺎ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺨﻴﻠــﻲ،
ﺁﻧـــﺎﺭﺷﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎﺭﻛﻮﺳﻨﺪﻳﻜﺎﻳﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ )ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻭﺭﺯ( ﻭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﺷﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﻮﻳﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻃﻐﻴﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻓﺮﺍ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ
ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ
ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺪﻳﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎﺭﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ ...ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺲ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﺩﺍﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ
ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ
ﻧﺎﻡ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻧﺪ! ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﺎﺭﺷﻴﺴــﻢ
ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻧﺎﺭﺷﻴﺴﻢ
ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﻳﺰﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎﺭﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﻓﺮﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﻧﺴﺒﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺑﺎ
ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻓﺮﺩﮔﺮﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﺎﺭﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﻭﺩﻭﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺎﻛﻮﻧﻴﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ
ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺁﻧﺎﺭﺷﻴﺴﺘﻢﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺘﻲ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﭼﺸــﻤﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﺑﻲﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﺭﺷﻴﺴــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﻪﺯﻋــﻢ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈــﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻛﺘﺒﺮ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ
ﺿﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻴﭙﻴﻚ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ
ﺍﻋﻢ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﺭﺷﻴﺴﻢ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﻜﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺳﻦﺳــﻴﻤﻮﻥ ،ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻧﻮﻳﺪﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺎﺭﻝ ﻓﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻭﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻜﺘﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻬﺸﺘﻲ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻧﻬﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺠﺎﻳﻊ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ
ﺗﺨﻴﻠــﻲ )ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻠﻌﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ؟!
ﺑﻪﺯﻋــﻢ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻨﻈــﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﻣﻔﻘــﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻧﺪ!( ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﭘﻴﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﭘﺮﻭﻟﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ! ﻟﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1914ﺧﻂ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺗﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺯﻋﻢ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻓﺮﻣﻴﺴﻢ ﺩﺭﻏﻠﺘﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﻭ ﻓﺮﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢﺳــﺘﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺒﻼ ﺗﻔﺴــﻴﺮ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ
ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺭﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﭘﻠﺌﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺟﻊ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ 1848ﻣﻲﺟﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺳﻦ ﺳﻴﻤﻮﻥ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻛﻠﻴﺴﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻟﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﻫﺮﺝ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺝ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﺮﺳــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺿﺪ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﮕﺮﻱ »ﺍﻣﭙﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ« ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻭﻭﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻣﺘﺮﻗﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻟﻨﻴﻨﻲ ﺣﺰﺏ ﭘﻴﺸــﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﺩﺍﻳﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺲ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑــﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻟﻨﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻔﻜﺮﺍﻧﺶ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺴــﻠﻂ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻋﻢ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﻟﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻓﺮﻣﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳــﺦ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻨﺎﻧﻬﺎﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻭ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﻭ
ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛــﺰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﻛﺎﺋﻮﺗﺴــﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺸــﺘﺎﻳﻦ ﻧﻔــﻮﺫ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺟﺪﻳــﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ -ﻛﻪ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ 1914ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ
ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﻙﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ -ﺭﺍ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻋﻀــﻮ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻧﻬــﺎﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻮﺭژﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﻣﻠﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ
ﻣﺠﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺁﻟﺘﺮﻧﺎﺗﻴﻮ
ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺷــﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﻱ ﻳﺎ
»ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﻃﻦ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ!« ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮﭘﺎ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺷﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﻪ
ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺮﻧﺎﺳﻴﻮﻧﺎﻝ ﺩﻭﻡ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻋﻘﺐﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺸــﻲ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ
ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪﺗﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺁﺑﺴﺘﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻲ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺴﻤﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺟﻤﺎﻫﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﭘﻠﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻧﻮﺭﺩﺩ.
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎ ﺑﺪ ﻋــﺎﺩﺕ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺘﺎﺭﻳﺰﻩ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﺑﻘﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻭﻟﺶ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻭ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﻠﻄﻪ ﭘﻴــﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣــﺪ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺪ ،ﺑﺪ ﻋﺎﺩﺕ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﺮﻛــﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺟﻨﮓﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻫــﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻘﻴﻤــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﺼــﺎﺹ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 50ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ
ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﺮﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻴﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻴﻨﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﻮﻙﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﺯﺩﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺭﻛــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷــﻮﻙﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﺭﺷــﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺟﻤﺎﻫﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ
ﻭ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴــﺖ ﺍﻟﮕــﻮﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠــﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠــﻂ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻬﻢﺗــﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘــﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻂ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺻﺎﻑ ﺍﻭﺍﺳﻂ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ
ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗــﻊ ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻈﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎﻱ
ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻲ ﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻚ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻧﺌﻮﺍﻳﺴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ
ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱ -ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ
ﻭ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ،ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻭ ﻟﻐﻮ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻣﺪﺕ ،ﻛﺎﻫﺶ
ﺑﻴﻤﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺑﻬﺎﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻲ،
ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻉﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸــﻒ ﺍﻓﻖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻋﻢ »ﻧﮕــﺮﻱ -ﻫﺎﺭﺕ« ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻋﻠﻢ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﺰﻳــﻚ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳــﺮ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻓﺮﻭﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻋﻨﺎﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺭﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﭘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ -ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ
ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺴــﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻔﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺱ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ »ﻧﮕﺮﻱ -ﻫﺎﺭﺕ«
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﺭﻱ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺱ
ﺑﺮﻑﭘﻮﺵ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺭﻭﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻋﺎﻟﻲﺭﺗﺒﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﻮﺡ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﭙﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻮﺭ ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺱ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺍﻣﭙﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ،ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢﮔﺮ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ »ﻧﮕﺮﻱ -ﻫﺎﺭﺕ« ﺍﻓﺴــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ!
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﻜــﺮ ﭼﭗ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﻛﻨــﻜﺎﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺁﻟﺘﺮﻧﺎﺗﻴﻮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻧﺌﻮﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﻮﺷــﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﻬﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ
ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱﺷﺪﻩ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﻮﺷﺶ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺳﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ
ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧــﺪ )ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳــﻪ( .ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺘﻲ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﻼﺷﻲ
ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺘﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
83
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﻣﻠﻜﻮﺗﻴﺎﻥ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﻣﻠﻜﻮﺗﻴﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺍﻧﺸـﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸـﻜﺪﻩ ﺣﻘـﻮﻕ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸـﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﻧﻮﻳﺴـﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫـﺎﻱ »ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻧـﻰ ﻋﻠﻞ ﻭﻗـﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﭙﻬﺮ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯﻫـﺎ«» ،ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫـﺎﻯ
ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ«» ،ﺳﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ« ﻭ ﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺩﺭﺳﻲ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩ ﺁﻥ« ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤـﺚ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻳﺴـﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸـﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ.
***
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺴـﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻟﻴﻔﺎﺗـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨـﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻔﺮﻣﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﺎﺕ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻴﻚ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ،ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﻱ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺳﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻴﻚ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻴﺎﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳـﺮﻋﺖ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺳـﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺽ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺨﺴـﺘﻴﻦ ﭘﻴـﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
84
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘــﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﻫﻢ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺟﻚ ﮔﻠﺪﺳــﺘﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ،ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﻪ
ﻧﺴــﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ» :ﻧﺴﻞ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻔﻲ« ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ» ،ﻧﺴــﻞ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ« ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺳﻂ ﻗﺮﻥ
ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ »ﻧﺴﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ« ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﻥ
ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﭼﭙﻮﻝ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﻳﺘﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﻳﺘﻮﻥ ﻣﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ »ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ« ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﻫﻢ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﺍﺳﻜﺎﭼﭙﻮﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ »ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ« ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺟﺒﺮﮔﺮﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺒﺮ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺍﻭ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ
ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﻧﻮﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ
ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﻴﺸﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ
ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﻮﻟﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ
ﺑﺎﻻ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻮﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻣﺘﻼﺷﻲ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﮔﻠﺪﺳﺘﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻧﻴﻜﺎﺭﺍﮔﻮﺋﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1979
ﻣﻴﻼﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﭘﻴﻮﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻲ ﻫــﻢ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛
ﻧﺴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ
ﻣﺮﺳــﻮﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﻭ
ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺳــﻮﻡ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻫﺎ ،ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻼﻙﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺩﺭﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻳﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ
ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ
ﻏﺮﺏﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑــﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏﻫﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ،ﺩﺭﻙ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻂ ﺳــﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ،ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺧﻂ
ﺳﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ،
ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝﺣﺠﻢﺁﺛﺎﺭﻧﺴﺒﺖﺑﻪﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺑﻪﺷﻜﻞﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺷـﺪ ﻛﻴﻔﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ
ﺭﺷﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻣﺎ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﻴــﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺗﺎﻛﻨــﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﻳــﻢ .ﺑﺨﺶ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻬــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺑﺮ
ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻫــﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻓﺮﻫﻨــﮓ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺭﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ
ﺯﺑﺎﻥﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﻲ .ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ »ﭼﻨﺪﻋﻠﺘﻲ«
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻡ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ،ﺭﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﺠﻢ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻧﻴﻜﺎﺭﺍﮔﻮﺋﻪ ،ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ،ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﻭ ...ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠــﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﺎﻧﺎ ﺁﺭﻧﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘــﺎﺏ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ« ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺷﺼﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ »ﺩﻧﻴﻮﻱ« ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﺎﻧﺘﻴﻨﮕﺘﻮﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ
»ﺳﻜﻮﻻﺭﻳﺰﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ« ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﻫﺎﻧﺘﻴﻨﮕﺘﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ »ﺳﻜﻮﻻﺭﻳﺰﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ« ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﻳــﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗــﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑــﻞ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼــﺮﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺵ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟــﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺜــﻼ ﻓﻮﻛﻮﻳﺎﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳــﻲ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﻣﻴﺸﻞ ﻓﻮﻛﻮ ،ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺪﺭﻥ
ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺴــﺖﻣﺪﺭﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣــﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗــﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﺜﺮﺕ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﺩﺍﻳﻢ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﺑﺮ ﻧﻬﻀﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ،ﻓﻠﺴﻄﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ
ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺳﺴــﺎﺕ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻻﻳــﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺳﺴــﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻌﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ،
ﺭﺍﺣﺖﺗﺮ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑـﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻧﻘـﻼﺏ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳـﺪ .ﻳﻜـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫـﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣـﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺤﺚ
»ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ« ﺩﺭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ،
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳـﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘـﻪ؟ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﭼﮕﻮﻧـﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻘﻪ ﺑـﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻲ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﻫﺒــﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ .ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨــﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴــﺪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻘﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑــﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ
ﻫﻢ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺟــﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﺪﻱ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻋﻠﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ
ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﺑــﻪ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻗﻴﺎﻡ
ﺗﻨﺒﺎﻛــﻮ ﻭ ﺟﻠﻮﺗﺮ ﻣﺸــﺮﻭﻃﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﺿﺎﺧــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺷــﺎﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻃﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺣﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺒﺶﻫﺎ ﻛﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ،ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﻛﺲ ﻭﺑﺮ
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﺒﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻳﻚ
ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻚ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ«.
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻋﻮﺍﻣــﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑــﻲ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ؟ ﭼــﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺴﺎﺟﺪ
ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻫﺮﻛــﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺑﺰﻧﻴﺪ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ،ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ
ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺁﻥ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻱ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺜﻼ
ﺑﺤﺚ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ،ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﻫﻤــﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺘﻜﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﺗﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ،
ﻣﺜﻼ ﻧﻬﻀﺖ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1962ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ 132ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺘﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﺶ ﺭﺥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﺵ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻻﻳﺖ
ﻓﻘﻴــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﻡ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻧﺰﺩ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﭘـﺲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺛﺎﺑـﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣـﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻧــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻫﺎ
ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺩﺭﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﭘﺎﺭﺍﺩﺍﻳﻢ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺎ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻃــﻮﺭ ﻛﻞ .ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻋــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱﻣﺜﻞﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﺩﻻﻳﻞﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﺑﺎﻋﺚﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﺷﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ
ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳــﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻠﻲﺗﺮ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻣــﺎ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﺣﺎﻝ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻲﺗﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻲﺗﺮ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻲ،
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ،ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﻭ...
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺴــﻢ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺧﺎﺹ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺿﻤﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻥ
ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﻨﺎ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ »ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﻴﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﻲ« ﺗﺪ
ﺭﺍﺑﺮﺕﮔﺮ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺥ ﻣﺸﻴﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ« ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﻣﺎﺭﻭﻳﻦ ﺯﻭﻧﻴﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﻲ
ﺷــﺨﺼﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺑﺸﻴﺮﻳﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲ ﺟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻴﻤﺰ
ﺩﻳﻮﻳﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒــﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﻋــﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻫﺎ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ؛ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺁﺑﺮﺍﻫﺎﻣﻴــﺎﻥ» ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ« ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ
»ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﺘﻮﺍﺯﻥ« ﺳــﺎﻣﻮﺋﻞ ﻫﺎﻧﺘﻴﻨﮕﺘﻮﻥ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﺎﺭﻟﺰ ﺗﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ »ﺑﺴﻴﺞ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ« ﺍﻭ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳــﻪ ﻫﺎﻧﺘﻴﻨﮕﺘﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻴﻠﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻛﻴــﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﻭﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻘﺪﻭﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﻋﻠﺘﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺎﻛﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺧﺬ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﺤﻜﻤﻲ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ،
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩﺳﺎﻳﺮﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞﺍﺳﺖ.ﻣﺎﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢﻧﻘﺶﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ،ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ،ﻣﺮﺍﺳــﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻭ ...ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺻﺤﺒﺘﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻛﺲ ﻭﺑﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻛــﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑــﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺑﺰﻧﻴﻢ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺑﺤﺜﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ» :ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ
ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﻃﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ«.
85
ﺣﺴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻰ:
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ ﻏﺮﺑﺰﺩﮔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺋﺎﺕ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ .ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻼﺵ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺷﻤﺎﺳﺖ.
***
ﭼـﻪ ﻭﺟﻬﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷـﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ،ﭼﻪ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻰ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﻋﺪﻭﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻏﺮﺑﺰﺩﮔﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺖ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷــﺪ .ﻋﻠــﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻧــﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰ ﺑــﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎﺕ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ
ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ
ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺩﺭﻣﻰﺁﻳﻨﺪ .ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎﺕ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺣﺎﻭﻯ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ
ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﻨﺒﻌﺚ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻻ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻮﻉ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺁﻳﺖﺍﷲ ﻣﻄﻬﺮﻯ ﻫـﻢ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘـﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ
ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﻻﺟﺮﻡ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺁﻳﺎ
86
ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺴــﺘﻦ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﺎﺩﻻﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺣﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺷﻤﺎﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﺑــﺰﺭگ ،ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻨﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺴﺘﻦ ﻣﻘﻮﻻﺕ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﻤﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠــﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺭﺻﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﺮ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﺎﻓﻰ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻠــﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻪﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺩﻝﺗﺮ،
ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷـﻮﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳـﻼﻡ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ،ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ
ﻋﺪﻝ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺣﻖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳـﻼﻡ ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻨﻰ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻝ ﺍﻣﺮﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺎﻣﻪ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺴــﺘﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﭼﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺋﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺠﺎﺳـﺖ؟ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻗـﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺳﺖ.
ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳـﻤﺖ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻰ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻝ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺴـﺮﻯ ﺳـﻮﺍﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻯ
ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﺯﻳــﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺤﺜﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟـﻪ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﺳـﻮﺍﻝ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺗﻨﺎﻓﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ
ﺩﻳﻨــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫــﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠــﻒ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ،ﺍﺯﺟﻤﻠﻪﺩﺭﻋﺮﺻﻪﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑـﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ
ﺷﻜﻠﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻜﻤﻞ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛـﺮﺩ .ﻣﻀﺎﻓﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﮕﺮﺵ ،ﻣﺒﺎﻧــﻰﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻤــﻰ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻌﻰ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗــﺎ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺟــﺮﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﺣــﻜﺎﻡ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ
ﻓﻀــﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎﻱ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫــﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﮕﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ
ﻫﺴـﺖ .ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﭼﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺑـﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﮕـﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﻧﻔﻊﮔﺮﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻰ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒـﺎﻁ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻧﻔﻊﮔﺮﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﻔﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ
ﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄــﻼﺡ ،ﻏﺒﻄﻪ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺖ ﺗــﻮﺍﻡ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻊ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻣﺠﻮﺯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﺎﻥ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﻦ،
ﻳﻌﻨــﻰ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴــﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺠﻮﺯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ
ﺷﺮﻋﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻏﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻜﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﭘﻮﻟﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴــﺖ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺷــﺎﻛﻠﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺿــﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﭘﻮﻟﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﻥﭼﻴﺰﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻳــﺪ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑــﺎ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻛﻠﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺴــﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻬﺎﺕ ﺷـﺮﻋﻰ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﮔﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻥ
ﻋـﺪﻩ ﺍﻋﺘﻘـﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻻﺟﺮﻡ ﻣـﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧـﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫـﺎﻯ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﺑـﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﭘﻮﻟﻰ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﻭﺵﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻠﻰ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻰ ﺳـﺨﻦ
ﮔﻔﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﻭﺵﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻈﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻈﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺧﻠﻄﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﺵ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺧﻠﻂ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ »ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ« ﻭ »ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ« ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ.
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻳــﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﺩﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻗﻠﻢ ﺯﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ
ﺗﺤﺖﺍﻟﺸﻌﺎﻉ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ،
ﺗــﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻧﺌﻮﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻚ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴــﺘﻰ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﺭﺽ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﻜﺎﻡ
ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺷﺎﺧﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ
ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺜﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﺮژﻯ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ،ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷــﺎﺧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﻭﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺒﻬﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀﺮﺗﻌﺎﻟﻰ
ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻧﺌﻮﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺫﻋﺎﻥ
ﺩﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﻰ ﺑﺎ
ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﭼـﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺷـﻜﻞ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺸـﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ؟ ﻣﺜﻼ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻓﺼﻮﻝ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺧﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻀﻞ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻭ ﺭﺑﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻰ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﺳــﺦ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻢ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﻮﻉ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ -ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﺌﻮﻛﻼﺳــﻴﻜﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻧﻜــﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ
ﺑﺎﻧﻜﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺭﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺳﺨﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻀﻼﺗﻰ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﭘﻮﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻧﻜﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺑــﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻮﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻧﻜﻰ ﺭﺑﻮﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻃﻼﻕ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻬﻨﻪ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻧﻜﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺭﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺣﺪ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧــﻢ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻛﻨﻢ.
ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺜــﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻧﻜﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺭﺑﺎ ،ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎ ﭘﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺟﺰﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ،ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺑﺤــﺚ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺭﺑﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻓﻰ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺸــﻴﻨﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧــﺖ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎﻯ
ﻧﻔﻊﮔﺮﺍ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﺗــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣــﺪﻝ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻰ
ﺷﺮﻋﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ
ﻣﺼﺮﻓــﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪﻯ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻧﻔﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﻣﺤﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ
ﺑﺮﺧـﻰ ﺍﻋﺘﻘـﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧـﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ
ﻭ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺘﻰ ﻧﻴــﺎﺯ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﺁﻥﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺗﺤﺖ
ﺳﺮﺍﺳـﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳـﻼﻡ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﺳﻤﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﻋﻨـﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼـﺎﺩ ﺍﺳـﻼﻣﻰ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻠــﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻣﻦ ﭼﺸــﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻌﺮﻓـﻰ ﺷـﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﻳـﻪ
ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻢ.
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻟﻌﺎﺑﻰ
87
ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ
ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ
ﺳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻮﺭﻭﺯﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻔﻮﻕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﻮﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻴﺎﺩﺕ ﺗﻮﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺮ ،ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺷــﮕﺮ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﻳﻪ
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺗﻮﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺮ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐــﺎﺕ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﻈﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺼﺎﻳﺺ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﻮﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺮ« ﻣﻲﻛﻮﺷﺪ ﺳﻠﻄﻪ ﺗﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﺳــﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﺨﺸــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﺍ
ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳــﻚ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕــﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ،ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥﺳــﺎﺯﻱ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺩ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﮔﺮﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺳﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ» .ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ«ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ
ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﻮﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺮ ﻭ
ﺗﻐﺬﻳﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺩ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺫﻫﻨﻴﺖ
ﻣﻨﺘﺞ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻔﻮﻕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺗﻮﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺮ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﺪﻳﻦﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﻠﻄﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻳﻚ ﺳﻠﻄﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻴﻄﺮﻩ ﺑﻼﻣﻨﺎﺯﻉ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮﻯ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﻨﺒﻌﺚ ﺍﺯ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺗﻮﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺮ« ﺑﺎ ﭘﻲﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻣﻤﺎﻧﻌﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘــﻪ ﺍﻋﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ،ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻋــﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ،ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸــﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﻗﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
»ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ« ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ »ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ« ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﺩﺳﺘﻰ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ »ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ« ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ »ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ« ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺰﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮگﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﻮﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ .ﺍﺩﻏﺎﻡ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ« ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ـ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ »ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ« ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ »ﺩﮔﺮﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﺎﻧﻲ« ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﺴــﺘﺤﻜﻤﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻌﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺸــﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺪﻳــﺪﻩ »ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ« ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺟﻬﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴــﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ
»ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻧﻲ« ﺭﺥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ »ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ«
ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺳﺘﺎﻟﮋﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ
ﺑﺪﻝﺷﺪﻩ.ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺏ،ﻛﺎﺭﻝﻭﺭﻭﺍُﺑﺮگﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﺿﺮﺑﻪﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻴﻂﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ
ﻭ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺑﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ»:ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺏ ﻧﺎﺷــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻮﺱ
ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻋﺎﺭﺽ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻼﺋﻢ ﻭ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﻭ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺯﻣــﺮﻩ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺩﺳﺖﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ...
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
)ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻠﻮ ،ﺹ (139
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺯﻋــﻢ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﻫــﺎ »ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﻱ« ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻧﻔــﻲ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﺎﻭﺭﻱ
) .(collectivismﺟﻤﻊﺑــﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻱ ﺗﻨﮕﺎﺗﻨﮓ
88
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺎﺭﻳﺴﻢ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ـ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﻳﻪ
ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻮﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﺟﻤﻊ» ،ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ »ﻧﻔﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ـ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﻳﻚ ﻗﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﻴﺖ« ﺭﺍ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺰﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﮕﺮﻩ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠــﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺪﻭﻛــﺲ ﺩﺭ 1869ﺭﻭﺍﺝ
ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﺎﻛﻮﻧﻴﻦ ،ﺁﻧﺎﺭﺷﻴﺴــﺖ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺭﻭﺳﻲ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ،
ﻛﻮﻟﻜﺘﻴﻮﻳﺴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻚ »ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ« ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻋﻼ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ
ﺭﺥ ﻋﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﻫﺎ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﺭﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻟﻔﺎﻓﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﻚ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺛﻘﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ »ﻧﻔﻲ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ« .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
»ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﻱ« ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺟﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﭘﺮﻧﺴــﻴﺐ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺭژﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻨﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﻬﺮﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺠﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ
ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ،ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ،ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﺧﺎﺹ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺗﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻓﺮﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺼﻪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﺎﻳﺺ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺺ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺳﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﻚ
ﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻔــﻜﺎﻙ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﺳــﻨﺦ
ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺯﻳﺴﺖﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﻫﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻴﺼﻪﺍﻱ
ﻛﻪ »ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ« ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﻚ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ »ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ« ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﻤﻴﺖ
ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻦ »ﺗﻨﻮﻉ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ« ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺯﻳﺴﺖﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ »ﻣﺸﺨﺺ«ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﺎﻳﺺ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﺮ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﻣﻐﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺑﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺟﻬﺖﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺠﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ
ﺷﻬﺮ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻰ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﻠﺐ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﺧﺒﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﻫﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ
ﺧﺼﺎﻳﺺ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﺪﻋﻰﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺯﻳﺴﺖﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﺰﻡ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻱ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻳﻚﺳــﺎﺯﻭﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺘﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻭﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻫﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻖ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻖ
ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ! ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﻤﻴﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻦ
ﺑﻪﺯﻋﻢ ﺁﺩﻭﺭﻧﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺭﻛﻬﺎﻳﻤﺮ
ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻛﺴﻴﺮ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻴﺮﺩﻟﻲ
ﻭ ﺩﻟﻤﺮﺩﮔﻲ ﻣﺼﺮﻑﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺣﺎﺩﺙ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﺣﻖ ﻣﺨﺎﻃــﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕــﻰ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﮕﺮ
ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ »ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺯﻳﺴــﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ
ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻰﻛﻪﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪﺍﻣﺎﺩﺭﺟﺎﻯﺧﻮﺩﺟﺬﺍﺏﺍﺳﺖ.ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ،ﺑﺎﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪﺑﺮﻧﻜﺎﺗﻰﭼﻮﻥ»ﻓﺮﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ«ﻭ»ﻫﻮﻳﺖ
ﻓﺮﺩﻯِ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺟﻤﻌﻰِ ﺗﻮﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺮ« ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻪ
ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯﻭﺍﺟﺪﺍﺻﻞﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻰﺷﺪﻥﻓﺮﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﺟﻠﻮﻩﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﺩﺭﻳﻚ
ﺍﺻﻞ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﻚ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ،ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ،ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﺑﺮﻋﺪﻡ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ »ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ،ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﻳﻨﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻰﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﭘﺎﻯ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ »ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ« ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻣــﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺭﺍﻯ ﺁﺩﻭﺭﻧــﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺭﻛﻬﺎﻳﻤــﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑــﺎﺏ »ﺻﻨﻌﺖ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺳــﺎﺯﻱ« ﻭ »ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻱ« ﺭﺥ ﻋﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ» :ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ
ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺗﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺑﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺧﺮﺍﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮ ﻋﺎﻣﺪﺍ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻣﻲﻧﺎﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻫﺮ ﺷﻚ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲِ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻫﻠﻪ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﺼﺮﻑﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎﺝ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺘﻲ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦﻧﺎﭼﻴﺰﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.ﺣﺎﺻﻞﻛﺎﺭﻫﻤﺎﻥﺣﻠﻘﻪﻣﻐﺰﺷﻮﻳﻲﻭ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱﺟﻌﻠﻲﻣﻨﺘﺴﺐﺑﻪﻗﺒﻞﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺩﺭﻣﺘﻦﺁﻥﻭﺣﺪﺕﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ
ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﻮﻱﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻜﻢﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ«.
ﻫﻮﺭﻛﻬﺎﻳﻤﺮ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻭﺭﻧﻮ ،ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺭژﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﺘﻀﻤﻦ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ
ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎﻥِ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻮﺍﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺣﺪﺗﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ
ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ.ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ»:ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﺎﻻﻱ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﺎﺑــﻊ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻮﺭﻛﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺣﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﻴﺰﺩ«.
ﺑﻪﺯﻋــﻢ ﺁﺩﻭﺭﻧــﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺭﻛﻬﺎﻳﻤــﺮ ،ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱﺍﻧﺪﻭﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲﺍﻛﺴﻴﺮﺣﻴﺎﺕﺻﻨﻌﺖﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻴﺮﺩﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻟﻤﺮﺩﮔﻲ
ﻣﺼﺮﻑﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺣﺎﺩﺙ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﺟﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ،ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺼﺮﻑﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻴﺎﺩ ﺍﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ»:ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﻤﻬﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻫﺮ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻬﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺸﻜﻮﻙ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕﺳﺮﺍﺳــﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﺟﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺒﺮ
ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺍﺟﻨﺎﺱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺍﺟﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﻳﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ«.
ﺑﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺭژﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﻴﻄﺮﻩ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ ـ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ـ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﻛﺎﭘﻴﺘﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺧﺪﺷﻪﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻝ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺩﺕ ﺗﻮﺗﺎﻟﻴﺘﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ
ﻧﻮﻋــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﺰﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺨﻔﻲ ﻟﻴﺒﺮﺍﻟﻴﺴــﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼــﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻣﻊ
ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻨﻔﺬ ﺍﺳــﺖ.ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻮ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻰ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ،ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴــﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﺩﻏﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﺘﻰ
ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷﺒﻬﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺫﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﺪﺍﻋﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺒﻨﻰﺑﺮ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻴﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ
ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﮋﺩﻡ ﺑﻰﺳــﺮﻭ ﺗﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﻣﺎﻧﺴــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻘﺎ
ﺁﻭﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺣﺪ
ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻰﻛــﺮﺩ؛ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ.
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺗﺒﺼﺮﻩ »ﻙ« ﻣــﺎﺩﻩ »ﻳﻚ« ﻓﺼــﻞ »ﺍﻭﻝ« ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻛــﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﻓﻘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻯ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﻋﻴﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝﻃﻠﺒﻰ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ؛ﺩﺍﻋﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝﻃﻠﺒﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴــﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺗﺒﺼﺮﻩ »ﺝ« ﻣــﺎﺩﻩ 4ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﺼﻞ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﺸــﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺧﻂ ﻓﻘﺮ )ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﻰ( ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺒﺨﺸﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺫﻛﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻣﻊ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓــﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎ ﻣﺼﺮﻯ ،ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﭘﺴﻮﻧﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ )ﺳﺎﺑﻖ( ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺵ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴــﻨﺪ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺧﻂ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻯ ﻭﺑﻴﻤــﻪ
ﻓﻘﺮ ﺷﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ» :ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺧﻂ ﻓﻘﺮ
ﺧﺪﻣــﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰﻛﻪﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭﺩ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺭﺩ«» ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺧﻂ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺳﺎﺯﻭﻛﺎﺭ
ﭘﺴﻮﻧﺪﻧﻬﺎﺩﻋﻤﻮﻣﻰﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﻓﻘﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﺮﺩ«» ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؛ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺮ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺧﻂ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ« ﭘﺎﺳﺦﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ
ﺁﺷــﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺎ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ .ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ
ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﺼﺮﻯ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻧﺪ .ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻭﻯ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻭﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺧﻂ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻟــﺰﻭﻡ ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﺸﺖ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ،ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﻫﻤﻪ«
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯﺍﺯﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮﺍﻥﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﺎﺕ
ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓــﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﻛﮋﺩﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺮﻳﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻪﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎﻯﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋــﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﺬﻳــﺮﺵ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺟــﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﻨﺠﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
90
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ...ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﺴــﺎﺕ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻬﻨﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻢ ﻧﺸﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻭ
ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﺷﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩ
ﻣﺪﺩﻯ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﺪﺩﻯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻧﮕﻔﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﻫــﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺷﺒﻬﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺫﻫﺎﻥ
ﺗﺪﺍﻋﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺰ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺳــﺎﻳﻪ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ
ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺒﻨﻰﺑﺮ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﻴﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳــﺪ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺸــﻐﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻮ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﺫﺑﻴﺤﻰ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻧــﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﺎﻣــﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﺑﻤﺎﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻟﺒﻴﻚ ﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﮔﺮﻩﮔﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻞ ﭘﺎﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
21ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 29ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﻰ ،ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ،ﭘﻴﺮﻯ ،ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﮔﻰ،
ﺑﻰﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺘﻰ ،ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻰ ،ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ،ﺳﻮﺍﻧﺢ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ
ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺘﻰ ،ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺖ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﭘﻨﺞ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺩﺭﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕــﻰ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺗﺼﺪﻯﮔﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻮ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﻭﻯ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ
ﺷﺪ .ﻇﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﻜﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
–ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ – ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ 465ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻣﺼﺮﻯ ،ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴﻦ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ 300ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺍﺯ
137ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ 498ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ
ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﭘﺸﺘﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ
ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻥ
ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﻞ 29ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺵ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳــﻮ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﺎﻏﻞ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺶ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 500ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺸﺖ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻖ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺭﺥ ﻧــﺪﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺷــﺪ.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴــﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﺳﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪﮔﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺮﺿﺎ ﻣﺼﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻧﺨﺴــﺖ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ،ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﭼﺘﺮ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﻭ ﺁﺭﺯﻭ ﻭ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ.
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺑﺎﻧﻚ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﺩﻓﺘﺮﭼﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻰ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ...ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺎﻡ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﺮ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﭼﺘﺮ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
– ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ – ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﻮ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺑﺪﻫﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻯ ﻳﻚ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ 600ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻫﻜﺎﺭ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺰﺩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺳﺸــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺣﻖ
ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ 500ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺰﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﺭﻯ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖﻣﺤﻮﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺑــﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﺩﻳﺮﺑﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﺘﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؛ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻘﻄﻌــﻰ ﺭﻭﻯﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻭﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰﻛﻪﺑﻪﺟﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰﺣﻮﺯﻩﺭﻓﺎﻩﻭﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺗﻜﺎ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﺑﻪﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻏﻴﺮﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯﺑﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺑﻴﻤــﻪﺍﻯ ،ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻨﻰ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﻋﺪ
ﺣﺠﻢ ﻭﺳــﻴﻊ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺳﻦ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻭ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﺘﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺸﺎﻏﻞ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ،ﻛﺴﺮﻯ
ﺭﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ،ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﭘﺸﺘﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﻰ
ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺼﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻣﺰﻣﻪ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺩﻏﺎﻡ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻴــﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳــﺶ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ؛ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺗﻮﺍﻣــﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋــﻼﻡ ﻣﺼــﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ 19ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ،ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
1388ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴــﻦ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧــﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﻰ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴــﻦ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠــﻒ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴــﺖ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺍﻯ
350ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺗﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﺑﺴﺘﻦ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﻄــﻊ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ
ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬــﻮﺭ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺗﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺁﺑﺴﺘﻦ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﺍﻏﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻣﻴﺎﻧﮕﻴــﻦ 139ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻣــﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺍﻏﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
91
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮﻯ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩ ﻣﺪﺩﻯ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﻯ
ﻓﻴﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﻳﺎﻥ
»ﻣﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﺍﻯ ﭼﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﺰﻳﺴـﺘﻰ ،ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺼﺪﻯ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ،
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﺹ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﺎﻟﻴﻔﺸـﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﻨـﺪ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩ ﻣﺪﺩﻯ ﺍﺳـﺖ؛ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋـﻰ .ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻴﺮ ﻣـﺎﻩ 1386ﺑﺮ ﺍﺛﺮ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎﻳـﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺍﺷـﺖ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻳـﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺷـﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ،ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ...ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
ﻣﺪﺩﻯ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻰ ﺳﻘﻒ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ
ﺭﺍ ﺗـﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓـﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﺒـﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺪﻫـﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺗﻨﻪ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﻱ ،ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻭ
ﻧﺎﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
***
ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋـﻰ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑـﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ،
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺗﻤﺎﺱﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﮔﻠﻪﮔﺰﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺩﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﻮﺽ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻧﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺷــﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﺧﺒﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﺪ.
ﺍﺯﭼﻪﻧﻈﺮ،ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ،ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖﻣﺎﻟﻰ،ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﻴﻦﻭ...؟
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺑﺪﻫﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ،ﺩﺍﺭﻭﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ
ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕﺭﺳﺎﻧﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ،ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻳﺨﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﺪﻫﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺟﺪﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺴﺐ
ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻛﺴﺐ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ
ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖﻣﻨﺪﻯ
ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺎﺷﻰ
92
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﺒﺮﻳﻢ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻯ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻧﺸــﻮﺩ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ،
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺎﻡ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺣﻖ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺑﺖ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﻧﻘﺸﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﻣﺤﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ
ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻫﻢ
ﻣﻲﺭﻳﺰﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺤﺎﺳــﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﻯ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﺷــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻯ ﻳﺎ
ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻳﻜﺴـﺮﻯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﺎﻏﻞ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ
ﺷـﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻖ
ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ
ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷـﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴـﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻯ ﺗﻜﺎﻟﻴﻒ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭﻟــﻰ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﻧﻤﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﻫﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻼﻙﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻯ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﻋﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﻢ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮﻯ ﺍﻋﻀــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓــﺎﻩ ﻧﺒﺎﻳــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ
ﻏﻴﺮﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺭﺥ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺤﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ
ﻏﻴﺮﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ .ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔــﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ
ﻧﺎﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺑﺮﺳــﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻴﺐ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﻖﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ 15ﻧﻔﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺪ؟
ﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳــﻦ 15ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔــﺮﻯ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻰ ،ﺍﺻﻨــﺎﻑ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶﻫــﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ
ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 54ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐﺗﺮ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﺎﻯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ
ﻏﻴﺮﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺭﺥ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﻟﻮﺍﻳﺤﻰ
ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺴﺘﻀﻌﻔﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖﻣﺤﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﺗﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﺵ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ،ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮﻯﺑﮕﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳـﻂ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﻪ 350ﺗﺎ 400
ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻴﻮﻩ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺣﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﻘﻮﻕﺑﮕﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗــﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴــﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ
ﺭﻭﺍﻝ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺎﻏﻞ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺣﻖ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ )ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺷﺎﻏﻼﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ( ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪﺣﻘﻮﻕﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥﺭﺍﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺎﺳـﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻤـﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﻫـﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭﺵ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ.
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﻤﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ .ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ
ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ
86-87ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﺴــﺮﻯ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻌﻰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲﺍﻳﻦﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ،ﺍﻳﻦﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩﻭﺟﻮﺩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﻛﻪ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺁﻥﺑﺎﺷﺪﻳﺎﺧﻴﺮ؟ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰﻛﻪﺑﻨﺎﺳﺖﻛﺎﺭﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻯﻭﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﺩﻫﺪﭼﻘﺪﺭ
ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻴﺖ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﺘﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺷﻌﺒﻪﺍﻯ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻘﻄﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺳﻂ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺮﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻬــﺎﺩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻨﺪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﻋﻴﻪ
ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؛ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﺎﺷﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻰ ،ﺳــﺘﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻭ ...ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﻯﺟﺰ ﺍﺿﻤﺤﻼﻝ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ،ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻰﻛﻪﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺭﻓﺎﻩﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰﺍﺳﺖﻭﻓﺮﺩﻯﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭﻣﺴﻨﺪﺁﻥﻗﺮﺍﺭﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩﺑﺎﻳﺪﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﺧﻮﺩﺭﺍﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪﻭ
ﭼﻮﻥﻧﻘﺶﺧﻮﺩﺭﺍﺧﻮﺏﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪﺩﺭﺍﻣﻮﺭﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯﺗﺎﺑﻌﻪ
ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﺭﻓﺎﻩﺑﺎﻳﺪﻧﻘﺶﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻭﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪﺍﻯ ﭼﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﮔﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﻬﺰﻳﺴﺘﻰ ،ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺼﺪﻯ
ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ
ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﺎﻟﻴﻔﺸــﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺗﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﻼﻥﺗﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﺎ 27ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺧﺎﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺗﻠﻘﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺘﻰ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻳﺎ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﭼﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ )ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺼﻮﺏ ﺳﺎﻝ (54ﺭﺍ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐﺗﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﺳــﻄﻮﺡ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺫﻯﻧﻔﻌﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻛﻦ ﺁﻥ )ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ(
ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻘﺒﮕﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺫﻯﻧﻔﻌﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ؟
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﻫﺮ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؛ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺖ،
ﺩﺭﻣــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﭘﺰﺷــﻜﻰ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﻜــﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ .ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻓﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺳﺘﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺗﺼﺪﻯﮔﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ،ﺣﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ
ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏﻭﺯﻳﺮﺭﻓﺎﻩﻧﻴﺴﺖﻭﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻌﻀﻼﺗﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷـﺒﻬﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﻣﻴـﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻰ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻤﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﺪ،
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ،ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ
ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳــﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺨﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻟﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟـﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝ 85ﻭ ﺯﻣـﺎﻥ ﺣﻀـﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﻯ
ﻭﺭﺷﻜﺴـﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ،
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻴﻤﻪﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ ،ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ...
ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻻﻥﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎﺍﺯﻧﻘﻄﻪﺳﺮﺑﻪﺳﺮﻯ)ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﺷﺎﻏﻼﻥﺑﻪﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ(ﻋﺒﻮﺭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢﺑﻠﻜﻪﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯﻫﻢﺑﺮﺍﻯﺣﻞﻣﺸﻜﻞﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
93
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻗﻰ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺳﻴﺪ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺴـﻴﻦ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻪﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ
ﺩﻭﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴـﺘﮕﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ).(1376-84
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨـﺪﻭﻕ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻧﺸـﻨﻴﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳـﺖ
ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒـﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻟﺒﻴﻚ ﻧﮕﻔـﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻧﺨﺴـﺘﻴﻦ
ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ
ﺭﺳـﻤﻲﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﻲﭘـﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ .ﺑﺎﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ
»ﺛﺎﺑـﺖ« ﺍﻣـﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺎ ﻓـﺮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧـﻰ ﺭﻳﺎﺳـﺖ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴـﺘﮕﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷـﺖ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﺯﻳـﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫـﺎﻯ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻟﻄﻒ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
***
ﺣﻘـﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴـﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﭼﻨـﺪ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﺍﺯ 163ﻫـﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣـﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﺑـﻪ 460ﻫﺰﺍﺭ
ﺗﻮﻣـﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺭﺳـﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴـﺘﮕﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷـﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﺟﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ؟ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ
ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﺷــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻫﻢ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻡ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣــﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﻣﻦ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳــﺶ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺤﻮ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻏﻼﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﻧﻢ .ﺩﺭﻃﻮﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻫﻤــﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻘﺐﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻰ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﻲﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
94
ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺮﺥ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻧﻘﺪﻳﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺗﻮﺭﻡ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘــﻰ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺷــﺤﺎﻟﻲ ﺯﻭﺩﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﺑﺮﻕ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﺗﻮﺭﻡ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭘﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎ
ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﺤﺚ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﺳﻄﺢ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ،ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻰ 7
ﺗﺎ 8ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺣﻘﻮﻕﺑﮕﻴﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺷﻐﻞ ،ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻌﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺍﺷــﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻪ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺷــﻐﻞ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻗــﺪﺍﻡ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑــﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑــﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳــﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﻴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑــﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻉ
ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺼﺎﻥ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﻣﺪﺕ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﮕﻮ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﻯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺩﻟﺴــﻮﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰﺑﺮ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻴﺸﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ
ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﻯ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴــﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻯ ﺩﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﻳﻜﻰ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻰ
ﺑﺮ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﻧﮕﺮﻯ.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻔﺖ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻧﻰ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ،ﺗﻔﻜﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ
ﺑﺮﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﻗﻄﻊ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻌﻴﺸﺘﻰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ
ﺩﻧﻴــﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻧــﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﻣﺮﻛﻞ ﻭ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺴــﻴﺤﻰ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﻧﮕﺮﻯ ﻭ ﭘﺲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ،ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻨﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﻣﻌﻴﺸﺖ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻯ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﻧﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﻟﻴﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺗﻔﻜـﺮ ﺟﺪﻳـﺪﻯ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴـﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻗﺒﻼ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻫــﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﺮﺍﺯﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﻧﮕﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﺳــﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻮﺳﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺳﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻃﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻃﺮﺯ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﻧﮕﺮﻯ ﻭ
ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﻭﻧﻖ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻯ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻠﻮﻙﺷﺮﻕ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭼﺘﺮ
ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻭﺭﺷﻜﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ،ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻭ ...ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻫﻔﺘﺎﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻫﺸﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻞ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻪ
ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻜﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ؛
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﺍﮔﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﻴــﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻋﻤﻼ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻳﻚ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﻭﺭﺷﻜﺴــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﻯ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺗﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭﻗﺘﻰ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻘﺒﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻟﻴﺴﺘﻰ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻰ ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻤـﻪﺍﻯ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻭ ...ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﻃﺒﻖ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ
ﺗﺼﺪﻯﮔﺮﻯ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ
ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎ
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﻲﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺗﺼﺪﻯﮔﺮﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺷــﺪﺕ ﺗﺼﺪﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻓﻠﺴــﻔﻪ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻣﻐﻔﻮﻝ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ
ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫــﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻰ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺸــﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺭﺻــﺪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴــﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻋﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ
ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻗﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻥ ،ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻔﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ.
95
ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ
ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ
-1ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻯ )ﺁﺑﺎﻥ -60ﺑﻬﻤﻦ (59
ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﻭﺯﻳــﺮ ﻋﻠــﻮﻡ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ 9 ،ﻣــﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ.
ﻋﻠــﻲ ﺷــﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻜــﻢ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺧﻤﻴﻨــﻰ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﺑﻬﻤــﻦ 57
ﻣﺒﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻭﺁﻣــﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺷــﺪ )ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﺠــﺪﺩﺍ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨــﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺩﻏﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ( .ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻠﺘﻬﺐ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺁﻥﻗﺪﺭ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻭ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﻣﺶ ﺩﺭ
ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ ﻫﺸــﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ
ﻣﻠﺘﻬﺐ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .
ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻯ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺘﻰ
ﻣﻰﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺳﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﻋﻠﻤﻰﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰﺍﺵ ﺟﻠﻮﻩ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﺳﺎﻝ 58ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ
ﺷﺪ ،ﺷــﺮﻳﻌﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳــﺶ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣــﻮﺭ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﻭ
ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 69ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ
ﺭﺍ ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗﻰ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻐﻮﻝ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻤﻰ ﻭﺗﺮﺑﻴﺘﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﺪ .ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺱ ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ،81
ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻢ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ.
-2ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﻰ ) -60ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ (58ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺟﺎﺋﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻴﺮ ﻭﻗﺎﻳــﻊ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ
ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻗﺮﻋــﻪ ﻓﺎﻝ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑــﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ
ﺣﺴﻦ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﻰ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺭﺟﺎﺋــﻰ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻫﻤﺰﻣــﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ
ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ )ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ( ﻭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻬﺪﻩﺩﺍﺭ ﺷــﻮﺩ.
96
ﻋﺎﺭﻓﻰ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰﺗﺮﻳــﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﻗﻢ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ،ﻣﻮﺳﺴــﺎﺕ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1359
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ(
ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺷــﺪ .ﺣﺴــﻦ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺶ
ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 61ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺘﺎﺩ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺷﺖ،ﺳــﺘﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﻰ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﭘﺴــﺖ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ،
ﻣﻘــﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪﺍﻯ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﻳﻜــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﺶ ﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﺘﻰ ﺗﻴﻢ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻰ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮﭼــﻪ ﻓﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤــﺎﻅ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ
،ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ
ﺩﻫﻪ ﺷــﺼﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌــﻪ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺣﺴــﻦ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﻰ ﺟﺰﻭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺴــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻳﺨﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻼﻣﺘﻰ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ.
-3ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ )ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ (60 -64
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﺏ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻣﻰﺳﻮﺧﺖ.
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﻰ ﺟﺎﻳــﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻰ
ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗــﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰﺍﺵ
ﻫﻢ ﺑــﺎﺯ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﻣــﺎ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ
ﺣﻜــﻢ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﺠﻔــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺷــﻬﻴﺪﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ،ﻣﻬــﺪﻭﻯ ﻛﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻌــﺪﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴــﻴﻦ
ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻯ ،ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﺩﻯﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺎﻳﻰ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﺪ .ﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ،61
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﻛﺴــﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪﺩﺍﺭ
ﺣﻜﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ 60ﺗﺎ 64ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ﻭ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﻧﺒﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻰﺭﺳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﺪﻯ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ
ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻠﺘﻬﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺒﻮﺣﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﻋﻤﻼ
ﺍﺟــﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﻫﻴــﭻ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻯ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺗﺤــﺖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺳــﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ،
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﻩ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ،
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﺗﺴــﻮﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
-4ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻯ )(64 -68
ﻓﺮﻫــﺎﺩﻯ ،ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﭘﺰﺷــﻜﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴــﻨﺪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﻣــﻰﺯﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻬﻀﺖ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳــﺖ ﭘﺰﺷــﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺑﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺖ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻯ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻯ
ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ -ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺷﺪ،ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻴﻦ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻓﺮﺳﺎﻳﺸﻰ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺒﻰ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ،
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻋﺎﻟﻰ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨــﺪ .ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ،
ﺑﺎﺯ ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻛﻮﭼﻜﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻳــﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻈﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ،ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﺎﺩﻯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻗﺎﺋﻢﻣﻘﺎﻣﻰ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻼﻝ ﺍﺣﻤﺮ ،ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭﻩ ﻭﺯﺭﺍ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻯ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
-5ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ )(76-82) (68-72
ﻣﺼﻄﻔــﻰ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ،ﭘﺰﺷــﻚ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﺮﻛﺮﺳــﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ
ﻣــﻰﺯﺩ .ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻜﺴﻮ ﺻﺒﻐﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰﺍﺵ ،ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ
ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻭ 10ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺼﺐ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ
82ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ 12ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺳﻪ
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﺏ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 68ﺗﺎ 82ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺗﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪﺍﻯ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻣﺴــﺘﺜﻨﻰ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﻰ ﻭ
ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻰ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺖ
ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺷﺪ .ﻛﻠﻨﮓ ﺍﺣﺪﺍﺙ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺴــﻮ ﻭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﻰ ﺁﻣــﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴــﻴﻞ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ
ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻳﺖ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻛﻴﻔﻰ ،ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻌﻴﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧــﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ
ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻛﻴﻔﻰ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻼﺕ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻠﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ
ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ،ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭﻛﺎﺭ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑــﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯﻗــﺮﺍﺭﺑﮕﻴــﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ – ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﻡ -ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ،
ﻋﻤﻼ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﻋﻤﻼ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ،ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻛﻮﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 78ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺴﺒﻮﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺴــﻮ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﻭ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ،ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ،ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﺳــﺮﺯﻧﺶ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎ
ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴــﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑــﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ
ﺧﺎﺗﻤــﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺑﻌــﺪﺍ ﻛﺎﻧﺪﻳﺪﺍﻯ
ﺍﺻﻠــﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠــﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﻧﺸﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ،ﺭﺩ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻜﻢ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻰ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﺷــﺪ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺿﻌــﻒ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰﺍﺵ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭ ،ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻦ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ.
-6ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﮔﻠﭙﺎﻳﮕﺎﻧﻰ )(72-76
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﮔﻠﭙﺎﻳﮕﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﻢ
ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻭ
ﺣﻮﺍﺷــﻰ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ،ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻛﻤﻰ
ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳــﺐ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﻭ ﻛﻠﻨﮓﺯﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ،ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ،ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺑﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺨﺖﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ،ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻰﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ،
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺴﺘﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻰ ﮔﻠﭙﺎﻳﮕﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ
ﮔﻠﭙﺎﻳﮕﺎﻧﻰ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻯ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺸﻰ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻰ ﮔﻠﭙﺎﻳﮕﺎﻧﻰ،
ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻯ ﻭ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻓﻨﻲ
ﻭ ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻲ ﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲﻭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻲ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﻛﺒﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺭﺩ.
-7ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻰ )(82-84
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﮔﺮﺩﺭﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯ ﻧﮋﺍﺩ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﺷــﺪ ،ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ
ﻣﻰﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴــﺪ .ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷــﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨــﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻯ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻫﺎﺩﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﻴﻜﻰ ﻳﺎ
ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﻢﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ
ﺑــﻪ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻬﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻢ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻛﻴﻔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﻰﺳﺮ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ .ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ
ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻴﻚ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻧﻈــﺎﻡ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ،
ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺶ ،ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ »ﻛﻢﺧﻄﺮ« ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﻰ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫــﺪﻑ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﮔﻤــﺎﻥ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ،ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺑﺎﺟﺪﻳﺖ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺳــﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺍﺑﻘﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺖﺗﺮ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﻛﻴﻔﻰ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻰ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺳــﻜﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﻬﻢ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻯ
ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
-8ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ )(84-88
ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﻬــﺪﻯ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﺩﻭ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳــﺖ ﻣﺘﻔــﺎﻭﺕ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑــﺮ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳــﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﻋﻀــﻮ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻰ ﻭ
ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ
ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ
ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﻰ ﺟﺰ ﻋﻀﻮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ
ﺷــﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺳــﺘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻳــﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺣﻜﺎﻳــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻯ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﺤﺎﻓــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﻧﺎﺑﻐــﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻰﻗﺮﻥ«
ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻰ ﻋﻠــﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ
ﻣﻮﺳﺴــﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻛﻤﺒﺮﻳﺞ ﻭ ...ﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺭﺍﻯ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤــﺎﺩ ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺁﻧﺠــﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ
ﺑﻴﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻰ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻰ ،ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠــﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺴــﻮ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﻣﺪﻋﻰﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ 27ﺳﺎﻝ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺨﻄﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ
ﻫﻢ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ
ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺭﺱ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻣﺮﻳﻪ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ،
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﺯﻳــﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ،
ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻀﺎﺡ ﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ.
97
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺷﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ
ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﻫﻮﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻯ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﻬﺮ ﻧﮕﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻰ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻣﺴــﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻛﻤﻰ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺯﺍﻫــﺪﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ
ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺧﺒﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ )ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻛﻤﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ(
ﻋﺠﺎﻟﺘﺎ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ،ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﻰ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﻬﺪﻯ
ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻛﺴﻰ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ .ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ
ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻭﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺻﺒﺎﺣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃــﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﺎﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻻﺑﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻫﻤﺸﻬﺮﻯ ﺑﺎ
ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻧﻰﺍﺵ ،ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻜﺎﻥﺩﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻛﺴــﻰ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ
ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﺟﺰ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻐﻮﻝ
ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻫﻨﺮ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﺭ ﻧﺸــﺪ .ﻗﺮﻋﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ
ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺭﺷــﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻠﻚ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺑﻨﺸﻴﻨﺪ ،ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻰﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻠﻤﻰ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺠﻔﻰ ،ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻰ
ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺣﺴــﻦ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﻰ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺶ ،ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺭﻭﺯ ﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻈﻰ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﻄﺤﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﺮﺍﺯﭼﻨﺪﮔﺎﻫﻰ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺏ ﻋﻠﻤــﻰ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪ ﻳﺎ
ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻔﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻰ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ
98
ﻭ ...ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﺪﻝ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻳﺎ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺧﺎﺻﻰ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻋﺎﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻠﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻬﻮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻓﺖ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﺷــﻜﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻻﺩﺳﺘﻰ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﻛﻨﻜﻮﺭ 87
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ .ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴــﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻰﺳﺮ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﺼﻮﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻝ 69ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ
ﺩﺭﺩﺳﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺪﻯﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ .ﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ
ﺯﻧﺠﺎﻥ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻳــﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻋﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓــﺮﺩ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻰ
ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺗﻘﺼﻴﺮ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻧﺶ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺻﺤﺒﺘﻰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺁﻣﺪ ،ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻤﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ
ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻛﺎﺳﻪﺍﻯ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﻢﻛﺎﺳﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﺍﺳﺖ .
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻣﻬﺪﻯ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺑﺴﺘﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ
ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸــﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ
ﺻﻨﻔﻰ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ
ﻛــﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫــﺪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻠــﻰ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻳــﺎ ﺑﺮﮔــﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺗﺸﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﻰ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ
ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ
ﺣــﺬﻑ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩﺩﺍﺭﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﺋﺖ ﺟﺴﺘﻨﺪ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ،ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭﺝ ﺳــﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﺎﻡﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ» .ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩﺩﺍﺭ« ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﺶ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﺎﻋﺖ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪ ﻫﻤﺴﻮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﺜﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺳﻦ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﻰ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺎﺗﻴﺪﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻬﺎﻡﻫــﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺯﺍﻫــﺪﻯ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻧﺶ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﺸــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻍﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺩﺳــﺘﻤﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﻗﺒﺎﻯ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷﺪ .ﻳﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺗﻮﻛﻠﻰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﺪﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ.
ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﮔﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ
ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺼﺪﻯ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﺟﻨﺒﻪﺍﻯ ﺳــﻬﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻤﺘﻨﻊ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺳــﻬﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻬﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﺠﻮ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺯﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻯ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺿﻤﺎﻧﺖﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰﺍﺵ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﻻﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻬﻞ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻤﺘﻨﻌﻰ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﮔﻰﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻄﻖ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻰ ﻭ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﮔﻰ ﺗﻮﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮ ،ﺯﻣﺰﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻰ ﺟﺪﻯ
ﻗﻮﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻭﻝ ﺧﺒﺮ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻘﺪﻡ ﻟﻄﻔﻰ ،ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺒﮕﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﻔﻰ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻔﺎﻯ ﻟﻄﻔﻰ ﻭ ﻛﺒﮕﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ
ﻭ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸــﻰ ﻣﻮﺿﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﺷــﺨﺼﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺧﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺧﺮﻣﺸﺎﺩ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﻤﻰ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺎﻣﻞﺗﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺠﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﻋﻠﻮﻡ )ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳــﻴﺮ ﺗﻮﺳــﻌﻪ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻰ ﻭ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ
ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﺎﺩ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧــﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺎﺣﺐﻧﻈﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺨــﺶ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻭ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺸﺘﻢ 5 /ﻣﻬﺮ 48 /1388ﺻﻔﺤﻪ /ﻭﻳﮋﻩﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﺎﻗﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ
ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻳﻢ
ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ -ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺷﻮﻗﻲ
ﭘﻴﮕﻴـﺮﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺷـﺪ .ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷـﺪﺕ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻧﺖ ﻓﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ
ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ 28ﻣﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷـﺒﺎﻧﻪﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺭﺳـﺎﻟﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻫﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻱ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ »ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﺩﻱ« ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﻣﺪﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ .ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻫﻪ ﭘﻨﺠﻢ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﺍﺵ ،ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻣﻲﺷـﺪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻱ
ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺑﺎﻗﺮ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ.
100
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ،ﺗﻮﻧـﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺷـﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﻗﻄﻌﺎ.
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻫﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻭﻋﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﻓﺘﺘﺎﺡ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﺷــﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺧﻮﺷﺤﺎﻝ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ
ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺩﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ .ﻗﺒﻼ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻭ ﺳــﺨﺘﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻳﻚﭼﻬﺎﺭﻡ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ
ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺭﺳــﺎﻟﺖ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ؛
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪ 28ﻣﺎﻩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻭ
ﺩﻭﻣﺎﻩ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﺶ ﺟﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﻳﻜﺼﺪ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻓﻨﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ.
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺗﻮﺣﻴــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺝ ﻣﻴﻼﺩ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ
ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻱﻛﺎﺵ
ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖﺑﻪﺗﻮﻧﻞﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪﺗﻌﺼﺒﻲﭘﻴﺪﺍﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.ﻳﻌﻨﻲﻳﻚﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﻞ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﻭ ﺗﺎ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ،ﺗﻌﺼﺐ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻏﻴﺮﺗﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ .ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ .ﺍﻻﻥ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ،ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎ ،ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﺳﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﺗﺎﺑﻪﻧﻘﺶﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ،ﺩﻳﻦ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻭﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱﺩﺭﺟﻨﮓ.
ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺎﻫﻢ
ﺍﺯﺍﻳﻦﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﺟﺪﺍﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.ﺯﻣﺎﻥﺟﻨﮓﺗﻮﺟﻪﺑﻪﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻭ،ﺟﻨﮓﺭﺍﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﻭﺑﺎﻫﻤﻴﻦﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩﻭﺑﺎﻭﺭﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪﻫﻴﭻﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻛﻪﻛﺎﺭﻱﺭﺍﻧﺸﺪﻧﻲ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ.ﻳﻌﻨﻲﺍﺯﻧﻈﺮﺁﻧﻬﺎﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰﺷﺪﻧﻲﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺣﻤﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲﻫﺎﺍﻳﻦﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪﺍﻳﻦﻗﺴﻤﺖﻗﻀﻴﻪﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺷﺪ.ﻣﺎﺳﻌﻲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﭘــﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻫﻢﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲﻧﺴﺒﺖﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﻗﻀﻴﻪﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ
ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢﻛﻪﺩﺭﻛﺎﺭﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲﻧﻴﺴﺖ.ﻛﻼﻧﺴﺒﺖﺑﻪﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﻫﺎﻭﻧﺴﺒﺖﺑﻪ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ،ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢﺍﻳﻦﺗﺤﻮﻝﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺯﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺁﻳـﺎ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓـﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ؟
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺷﻮﺩ؛ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﻭ ﺍﻣــﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳــﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻲ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﻃﺎﻏﻮﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ،ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﻦ
ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ .ﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻓﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺷﺌﻮﻧﺎﺕ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﻢ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺒﻨﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ
ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﺮ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﺑﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻝ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ .ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺑﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﭘﻨﺞ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ 30ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺩﺷﻤﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺗﺸﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﭘﺎﺭﺗﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ،ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ 400 ،300ﺳﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺷﻤﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﺶ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﻡ!
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺣﺮﻑ
ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻇﻠﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ
ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻱﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ.ﺑﻪﺩﺭﺩﺣﻮﺯﻩﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩﻭﺍﻳﻦﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ
ﻭ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓــﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻗﻀﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ،
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺳــﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴــﻢ ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺟﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ.ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﻣﻦ
ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺍﻓــﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ
ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻣﺘﺤﺎﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﭘﺲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺁﺑﺮﻭﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ؟ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴــﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺖ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺧﺪﺍﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲﺧﻮﺩﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﺎﺱﻛﺎﺭﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﻭﻧﻪﺧﺪﺍﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ.ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻣﻦﺑﺨﺶﻣﻐﻔﻮﻝﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺟﻨﮓﺍﺳﺖ.ﺧﻴﻠﻲﺍﺯﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲﻛﻪﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲﻭﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲﺣﻀﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ،ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ
ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻫﻢ
ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔــﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻓﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺗﻌﻤﺪﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻫﻢ
ﺳﻬﻮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺿﺮﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﺘﺤﻤﻞ
ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺠﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢﺑﺎﻫﻤﻴﻦﻧﮕﺎﻩﻛﺎﺭﺭﺍﭘﻴﺶﺑﺒﺮﻳﻢ.ﻳﺎﺩﻡﺍﺳﺖ.ﺩﺭﺳﺎﻝ73،72
ﻳﻚﺟﻠﺴﻪﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺑﺎﺟﻨﺎﺏﺁﻗﺎﻱﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢﻛﻪﺁﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻛﺸﻮﺭﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪﻭﺑﻪﻫﻤﻪﺍﻳﻦﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﻫﺎﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﻛﺮﺩﻡ.
ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺟﻠﺴﻪﺍﻳﻦﻣﺜﺎﻝﺭﺍﺯﺩﻡ:ﺷﻤﺎﺑﺎﻭﺭﺗﺎﻥﻣﻲﺷﺪﻳﻚﺭﻭﺯﻱﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ
ﻣﺜﻞﺷﻬﻴﺪﻫﻤﺖﻭﺷﻬﻴﺪﺯﻳﻦﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺍﺯﭘﺸﺖﻣﻴﺰﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪﻭﻣﻌﻠﻤﻲﺑﻪ
ﺯﺑﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥﺷﻤﺎﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞﺷﻮﻧﺪ؟ﭼﺮﺍﻣﺎﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢﻛﻪ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪﺩﺭﻋﺮﺻﻪﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ،ﻣﺘﺮﻭﺑﺴﺎﺯﻧﺪ،ﺳﺪﺑﺴﺎﺯﻧﺪﻭ....ﺍﮔﺮﻣﺎ
ﺁﻥﻣﻮﻗﻊﺩﺭﺑﺴﻴﺞﺑﻪﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ،ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂﺑﺮﺍﻱﺑﺮﻭﺯ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ؟ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﻧﻪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ(
ﺍﻳﻨﻘﺪﺭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪﺁﻧﻬﺎﺑﺴﭙﺎﺭﻳﻢ.ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲﺩﺭﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﺩﻫﻴﻢﻭﺩﻭﻟﺖﺩﺭﻛﺎﺭﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨــﺪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺣﺎﻻ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲﻭﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭﻧﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ.ﻣﻦﺍﻳﻦﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺭﺍﺩﺭﺁﻥﺟﻠﺴﻪﻣﻄﺮﺡﻛﺮﺩﻡﻭﺟﻮﺍﺏﻗﺎﻧﻊﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱﻫﻢﺍﺯﺁﻗﺎﻱﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ
ﻧﺸﻨﻴﺪﻡ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱﺍﺳﺖ.ﻣﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩﺗﻮﻧﻞﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪﺭﺍﻣﺜﺎﻝﻣﻲﺯﻧﻢﻛﻪﻓﺮﺩﻫﻢ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ
ﺗﻌﺼﺐﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ.ﺑﺮﺍﻱﻫﻤﻴﻦﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢﻛﺎﺭﻱﺭﺍﻛﻪﭼﻬﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﭘﺮﻭژﻩﺗﻮﻧﻞﺭﺳﺎﻟﺖﺍﺳﺖﺑﻪﺟﺎﻱﻳﻚﺩﻫﻪﺩﺭ 28ﻣﺎﻩﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﺩﻫﻴﻢ؛
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻧﺸﺎﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳـﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺩﺳـﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﮔﺬﺷـﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻩ
ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧـﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﻘﺎﻳﺪ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﻠﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺷـﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﺳﻮﻡ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 88
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ؛ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ.
ﻣﻦﻓﻜﺮﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢﻛﻪﺍﻳﻦﺩﺳﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱﺭﺍﺑﺎﻳﺪﻛﻤﻲﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺩﻫﻴﻢ،ﺧﻴﻠﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻫﻴــﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ
101
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺷــﺠﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﮔﺮﻭﻫــﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺋــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎﻭﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﻢﺍﺛﺮﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺧﻮﺑﻲﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺑﺨﺶﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪﺩﺭﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.ﻣﻦﻭﻗﺘﻲﺑﻪﺩﺳﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻧﮕﺎﻩﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢﺧﻴﻠﻲﺑﻪﻧﺪﺭﺕ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻢ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﺸﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺮﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺑﺮﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻧﻴﺰﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ،ﮔﺎﻫﻲﮔﻮﺷﻪﻧﺸﻴﻦ
ﺷﺪﻧﺪﻭﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲﻫﻢﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪﻛﻪﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪﻭﺟﺰﻭﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪﻛﻪﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻇﻠﻢ
ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻧﺴــﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﻬــﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪﻛﻪﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪﻳﻚﻛﺎﺭﻳﻜﺎﺗﻮﺭﺍﺯﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻭﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱﺑﺎﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲﻛﻪﺩﺭﺁﻥﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦﻛﺎﺭﻱﻧﻴﺴﺖﻛﻪﺑﺎﻓﻄﺮﺕﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪﻭﺻﺪﺍﻗﺘﻲ
ﺩﺭﺁﻥﻭﺟﻮﺩﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎﺩﻭﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.ﻳﻚﮔﺮﻭﻩﺑﻪﻟﺤﺎﻅﺳﻨﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩ ﭘﺲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻡﻭﻣﻦﻫﻤﺎﻥﻫﺴﺘﻢﻛﻪﺍﺯﺟﻨﮓﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﺩﺭﺳﺖﺩﺍﺭﻡ.ﺍﻳﻦﺗﻘﻠﺒﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ
ﺭﺍﻭﻱﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕﺟﻨﮓﺍﺳﺖﺍﻣﺎﻳﻚﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞﺟﻨﮓﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﻛﻪﺑﻪﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪﺩﺭﺟﻨﮓﺑﻮﺩﻩ،
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ،ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻳﻜﺎﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ؛ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺟﺪﺍﺑﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻓﺮﺷﺘﮕﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﺮﺷﺘﮕﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺸــﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻻﺕ ﻣﺤﻠﻪ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺴــﺎﺑﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻟﻤﭙﻦ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﺮﺩﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﺗﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛــﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺷــﺐﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻧﻤﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺧﺪﺍﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻳﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ .ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺗﺰﻭﻳﺮ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺭﻳﺎ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺍﻻﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻇﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻖ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻧﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ .ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﭼﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺎﺗﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻭ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺰﻝ ﻭ
ﻧﺼﺐﻫﺎﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ :ﺍﻭﻝ ﺗﻘﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺟﻬﺎﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺗﻘﻮﺍ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ
102
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻼﻛﻲ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘــﺎ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻮﺭﻩ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻛــﻪ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺧﺪﻣــﺖ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺭﺳــﻮﻝ )ﺹ( ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳــﻮﺍﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺟﻮﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛــﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﮕﺮﻳﺰﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ .ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻪ .ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺭﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻻﻭﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺯﻣﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻣﺠﺎﻫﺪﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻼﻙ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗـﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﺮﻳـﻒ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﻄـﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﮔﺰﺍﻓﻪﮔﻮﻳﻲ ،ﺧﺮﺍﻓﻪﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﻪ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﺑﺮﺳــﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻼﻳﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻳﻜﺎﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻛﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺟـﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﭼﻨﻴـﻦ ﺻﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ؟
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺗﻼﺷﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗــﺎ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺮﺳﺪ .ﮔﺎﻫﻲ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﻡ!
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻇﻠﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ
ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺧﻮﻥﺩﻝ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺟﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﭘﺴـﻨﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺳـﺎﻝ
59ﺭﺍ؟
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻔﺎﻑﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺳﺖﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻨﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻨﻲ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ
ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻨﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻫــﻢ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﺧﺪﺷﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺪﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻳﺎﺩﻡ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺋﺮﻱ ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯﻱ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﻴﻢ ،ﺩﻟﻴﻠﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎﺕ ﺑﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ
ﺍﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺐ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﺑﺖ ،ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺖ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺷــﺮﻁ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ،ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻛﺴــﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺎ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻟﺸـﻜﺮ ﻧﺼﺮ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﺪ ،ﺩﻭﺳﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺳــﺨﺘﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺁﻳﻪ »ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻟﻤﻮﻣﻨﻴــﻦ ﺭﺟﺎﻝ ﺻﺪﻗﻮﺍ ﻣﺎﻋﻬــﺪﻭﺍ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴــﻪ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻀﻲ
ﻧﺤﺒﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﻟﻮﺍ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻼ« ﺑﺎﺷﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ »ﻋﻠﻲ ﺳﺮﺭ
ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻠﻴﻦ« ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﺮﺳﻢ.
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﻇﻤﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻋﺎ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ،
ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻓﻠﻪ
ﻋﻘﺐ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻣﻨﺪﻩﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﻮﻳﻢ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
103
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﺑﺎﻋﻠﻲﺍﻛﺒﺮﻭﻻﻳﺘﻲﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻲﺟﻨﮓ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻚﻓﺎﺭﻟﻴﻦ
ﻫﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﺴﺮﻭﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﻋﻠﻲﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ 16ﺳﺎﻝ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳـﻮﻱ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻲﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ
ﺑـﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧـﺮﺩﺍﺩ 1376ﻭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪﺷـﺪﻥ ﻋﻠﻲﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ،ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺳـﻤﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺸـﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺳـﺘﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳﺒﺎﺏﻛﺸـﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳـﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﭘﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺳـﺘﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﺸـﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻭﺳـﻌﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔـﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻭﻻﻳﺘﻲ ﺑﺮ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻔﻮﺫﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ 30ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨـﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻳـﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑـﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣـﺮﺩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﺑﺮﻭﻥﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗـﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺗـﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺎﺳـﺒﺎﺕ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺑـﺎ ﻋﻠﻲﺍﻛﺒﺮ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﺑـﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ.ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻳـﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻭﻻﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳـﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﻚﻓﺎﺭﻟﻴﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻟﺤﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱﺍﺵ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﻱ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳـﻤﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ
104
ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑـﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻗﺎﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴـﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻣﻚﻓﺎﺭﻟﻴﻦ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻲﻧﺎﻡ
ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﺸـﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻏﻴﺮﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭ
ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕ ،ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻚﻓﺎﺭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻛﺘﻔﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﻭﻡ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ،ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻴﺒﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺒـﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻴﺒﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺨﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻛﺘـﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺩﻳﺪ؛ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ »ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﺷـﻤﻨﺪ« ﻟﻴﺒﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﺤﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﺮ ﻛﺮﺳـﻲ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﻧﺸﺴـﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻗﺤﻄﻲ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕـﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺖ ﻟﻴﺒﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺷـﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﮔﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺕﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡﻣﻮﺳـﻲ ﺻﺪﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﭙﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸـﻪ
ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﻤﺮﻗﺬﺍﻓﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﻕ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺳﻢ ﻟﻴﺒﻲ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻣﺬﻣﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻟﻴﺒﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣـﻲﺍﺵ ﻧﺒـﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﺧـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖﻫـﺎﻱ ﺍﺳـﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨـﮓ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻳﺎﻓﺘﻴﻢ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻲﺍﺵ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﻪ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻌﻬﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﻫﻤﺨﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺷــﺮﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1907ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻘﺴــﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1915ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﻭژﻩ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ
ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺷــﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ 1320ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻭﻟﺘﻴﻤﺎﺗــﻮﻡ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺁﺫﺭﺑﺎﻳﺠﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻗﻮﺍﻱ
ﺭﻭﺱ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﺳﺖﻧﺸــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺣﻜﻮﻣــﺖ ﺟﻌﻔﺮ ﭘﻴﺸــﻪﻭﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺫﺭﺑﺎﻳﺠﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻧﺎﺷــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣــﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﺠﻮﻡ ﻗﻮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﺘﻴﻤﺎﺗﻮﻡ
1322ﻗﻤــﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻋــﺪﻡ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧــﺖ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ
ﺷﺠﺎﻉﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﻨﻪ ،ﭘﺴﺮ ﻣﻈﻔﺮﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺼﺎﺩﻳﻖ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ 200ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺧﺴــﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﺷــﺪﻳﻢ .ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻫــﻢ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻱ 28ﻣــﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻋﻠﻴــﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺑﻪﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ
ﻗﻮﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻱ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻭ
ﺑــﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ
ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑــﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ
ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ
ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺸﺘﻮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻧﻪ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ،ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ
ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﭘﺲ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺴـﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸـﺘﺎﺭ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄـﻮﺭ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﺷـﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ
ﻣﺴـﻠﻤﺎ ﻧﺎ ﻥ ﺩ ﺭ ﺑﻮ ﺳـﻨﻲ ﻳـﺎ
ﻛﺴـﺐ ﺍﺳـﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺳـﻴﻦﻛﻴﺎﻧﮓ ﭼﻴـﻦ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ
ﻧﻪ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﺪﻝ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ؟
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ
ﺍﺟــﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﻫﻴــﺪ ﺧﺪﻣﺘﺘــﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺽ
ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻬـﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣـﺎ ﭘﺲ
ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ
ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺷﺪ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ
ﻳﻚ ﻋﺎﺭﺿﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴـﺎﻥ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ،
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤـﻜﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺑﻠﻮﭼﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺷــﻐﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﻡ ﺧﻠﻴﺞﻓﺎﺭﺱ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺴﺎﺳـﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻛـﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄـﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫـﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣـﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﺣﺪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﭘﺎﻛﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ،ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪﺧﺎﻥ
ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴـﻢ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨـﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺣﺰﺏ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﻠــﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣـﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩﻳـﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﭘﺸﺘﻮﻧﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺐ ﺳـﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴـﻢ ،ﺑﺎ ﺷـﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﻗﺼﺪﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺳﺮﺣﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﭼﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺻﻞ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺋﺘﻼﻑ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻳﻢ ،ﻧﻪ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﻡ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺧﺪﺷﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻮﭼﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺍﺳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ
ﺧﻄﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺷــﺮﻗﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻳﻢ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺭﺷﻮ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻳﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸــﺒﺮﺩ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﺎﻧﻚ ﺗــﻲ ،72ﺍﺻﻼ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ
ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ.
ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ،ﺷــﺮﻕ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﺻﺮﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴــﻢ .ﭘﺲ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ
ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺷــﻐﺎﻝ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ
ﺧﻄﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺷــﺮﻗﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄــﺮ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ
ﻣﻠﻲﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺷــﺮﻗﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺳﺎﻛﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻴﺞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻋﺎﻗﻠﻲ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﻣﺪﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺑﻴﻨﺪﺍﺯﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱﻫﺎ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺨﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ 15ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻱ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ
ﻗﺎﺳــﻢ ﺩﺭ 1958ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1980ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻩ
ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﻗﺎﺳﻢ،
ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ﻋﺎﺭﻑ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﻌﺜﻲﻫﺎ ،ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻨﺘﻮ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺭﺷﻮ ﻣﻠﺤﻖ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻘﻼﻱ ﻭﻃﻦﭘﺮﺳﺖ ﻣﻠﺖ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ
ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ،ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ
ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲﻫــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺿﻌﻒ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻗﺎﺟﺎﺭ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺼﺪﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﺮﻳﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﻭﻣﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺱ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺸــﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻱﻫﺎ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﮔﻮﺩ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ
ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺗﻲ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ.
105
ﺩﺭ ﻃـﻮﻝ ﺟﻨـﮓ ﻫﺸـﺖ ﺳـﺎﻟﻪ ،ﺍﺳـﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻣـﺎ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﻧﻪ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ،ﻧﻪ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﺨﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻚﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﻂﻣﺸـﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺴـﺮﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﺯﺩﻳـﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳـﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻨﺪ،
ﺷـﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳـﻔﺮ ﻣﻚ ﻓﺎﺭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻣﻚﻓﺎﺭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﻋﺪﻩ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺧﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻋﺪﻩ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ
ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﻔﺮ ﻣﻚﻓﺎﺭﻟﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺷــﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻮﺷــﻚ ﺗﺎﺏ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﺎﻧﻚ ﻣﻲﺯﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺷﻚﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺯﺩ.
ﺑــﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ .ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻚﻓﺎﺭﻟﻴﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﻪ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺷــﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﻣﺪﺗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻡ
ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫــﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺤـﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺎﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﻋـﻲ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺎﻭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﻫﻢ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺤﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ
ﻓﺎﻭ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪ ﻓﺎﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1967ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺣﻞ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ
ﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﺭﺩﻥ ،ﺻﺤﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻮﻻﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺣﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺶ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧـﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 479ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳـﺪ .ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﺴـﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻲ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﻫــﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﻜﺴـﺖ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻠــﺢ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎ ﺯﺩﻥ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳـﻴﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺎﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ
ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻻﻧﺲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ
ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ،ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺧــﻮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑــﻮﺩﻡ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺗــﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺎﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﮔﻮﺵﺷﻨﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺷﻜﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳــﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻓﺘﺢ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﻓﺎﻭ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺨﺖ
ﻣﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﺮﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺲﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻙ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺁﺗﺶ ﺑﺲ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﻙ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ
ﻫﺪﻑ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺼﺮﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﻢ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺣﺸﺖ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﺘﺢ ﺑﺼﺮﻩ ،ﻛﻮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻴﻦ 50ﺗﺎ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
60ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻙ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻋﻘﻠــﻲ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ
ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ.
ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ 15ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ،
ﻧﻄﻔﻪ ﺧﻔﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺘﺢ ﻓﺎﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 479ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛــﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﺘﺤــﺪﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺧﻠﻴﺞﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌــﺮﺽ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ
ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭﻟـﻲ ﺍﮔـﺮ ﻋـﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨـﮓ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣــﺎ ﺯﻳﺮﺑــﺎﺭ ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ .ﻋﻠﺖ
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﺭﺳـﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻮﻱ ﺩﻣﺎﻍ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ؟
ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺍﺗﻴﻮﭘﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺳﻮﻡ
ﺑﺎﻻ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﻣﺎ
106
ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ 1361ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳــﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻲ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ
ﻛﺎﺭﺳــﺎﺯ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺠــﻮﺯ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﻤﭙﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ،
ﻫﻠﻨﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ
ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻘﺼـﻮﺩ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳـﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻏـﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺑﺮ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﻚﭼﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻣﺴــﻔﻠﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺸــﻮﻳﻖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﻋﻜﺲﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﺮ ﻋﻘﻞ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗــﻊ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻋﻮﺍﻡ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ
ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﺮﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻲﺯﺑﺎﻧﻲ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻛــﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻄﻔﻪ ﺧﻔﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻛﺘﺒﺮ 1917
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻭﻏﺮﺑﻲﻫﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ 1917ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﻮﺭﺷﻴﺎﻥ ﺿﺪﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻠﺸﻮﻳﻜﻲ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ 1921ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺁﺳﻴﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ
ﺷــﺮﻗﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺗﻴﻮﭘﻲ ﻭ
ﺳﻮﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺗﺎﺳــﻴﺲ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻧﮕﻮﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺎﻗﻂ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ
ﻧﺮﺳــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﺎﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑــﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﻨﺎ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻘــﻮﻝ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸــﺒﺮﺩ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻙ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺎﻗﻼﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ
ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻠﻴﺞﻓــﺎﺭﺱ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻮﻳﺖ
ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫـﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺳﺎﻗﻂ ﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳـﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳـﺪ ﻫﺪﻑﮔـﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕـﺮ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗـﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﻫﻢ ﺯﺩﻥ
ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﻌﺜﻲ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻧﮕــﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪﺻﺪﺍﻡﺗﻨﻬﺎﺑﺎﺭﻭﺱﻫﺎﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖﺣﺘﻲﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﺘﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭﻣﻴــﻦ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻃﺎﺭﻕ ﻋﺰﻳــﺰ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻋــﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻮﻣﻮﻧﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻛﻤــﻚ ﻭ ﻋﻨﺎﻳﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﻴﺸــﺒﺮﺩ
ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺷــﻐﺎﻝ ﻛﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ
ﻏﺮﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ،ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺬﻳـﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺑـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫـﺎﻱ ﺟﻨـﮓ ﻧﺪﺍﺷـﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺋـﻢ ﻣﺘﺤﻤﻞ
ﺷﻜﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱﭘﻲﺩﺭﭘﻲﻣﻲﺷﺪ.ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻲﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1366ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻝﺗﺮﻱ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺴﻲ
ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻏﺮﺑﻲﻫﺎ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﻭ
ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ
ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﻠﻞ ﺩﺍﺋﻤــﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﮔﻨﺠﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠــﻪ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﺮﺍ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﮔﻨﺠﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺟﺮﺡ
ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻼﺗﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﻼﻥ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺷﺪ.
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،598ﻣﺎ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﺎﺭ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ
ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1366ﺗﺎ 1367ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺗــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺒﺎﺕ ،ﺭﻭﺯ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ
ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ
ﺍﺳﺮﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼــﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ،ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻲ ،ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﺳﺮﺍ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩ
ﺧﺴــﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻙ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ .ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺭﻓﺘﻢ ،ﻭﻟــﻲ ﻃﺎﺭﻕﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺷــﺪﻡ ﻣﺪﺗــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻢ ﺗــﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ
ﺑﻨﺪﺭ ﺑﻦﺳﻠﻄﺎﻥ ،ﺳﻔﻴﺮ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻓﻴﺼﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ
ﺷــﺪ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﺩ .ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﺪﻡ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ
ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻻﻳﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﺍﺭﻭﻧﺪﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻻﻳﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ .ﻭﻟﻲ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻲﺗﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﺟــﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣــﻪ 598ﺑﻪ ﻻﻳﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﺍﺭﻭﻧﺪﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺭﻭﻧﺪﺭﻭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ
ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻻﻳﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﺍﺭﻭﻧﺪﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ 1975ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﺍﺭﻭﻧﺪﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﺎﻗﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺳﻲﺑﻲﺳﻲ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻭ
ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻣﻲﻧﺸﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﻻﻳﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻻﻳﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻟﻘﻌﺮ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﻂ ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺭﻭﺩﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﻧﺼﻒ ﺭﻭﺩﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻤﻠﻚ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺣﺘــﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ
ﻻﻳﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻳﻢ ﻻﻳﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻟﺬﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺧﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺁﻥ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳــﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ 1975ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﻳﺰﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳــﭙﺲ
ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺍﺭﻭﻧــﺪﺭﻭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ .ﻫﺪﻑ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻠﻐﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻛﻞ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ
ﺟﺪﻳــﺪﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺎﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ 1975
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﻢﻋﺮﺽ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ
ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ،ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ
29ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ 1368ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ،ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ .ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ژﻧﻮ 20ﺭﻭﺯ ﻃﻮﻝ
ﻛﺸــﻴﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻤﺘﺮ ﻋﻘﺐ
ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﻧﻘﺶ ﭘﺮﺭﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 479ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﻐﺎﻣﻲ ﻓﺮﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻨﺪ 6ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ
ﻣﺘﺠــﺎﻭﺯ ﺻﺮﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻴﻠﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣــﺮﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺻﺪﺍﻡﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﻨﺪ 6ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺷﺪ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺳﻂ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺴــﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻫﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ 1975ﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻜﺎﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ 1975ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺕ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺷـﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨـﻲ ﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫـﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳـﺎﻥ ﺟﻨـﮓ
ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ،ﻟﻴﺒﻲ ،ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺟﻨﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ
ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ
ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻛﻤﭗﺩﻳﻮﻳﺪ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﭗﺩﻳﻮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺎﻳﺪﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﻧﻜﺘﻪﻧﻴﺰﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﻛﻨﻢﻛﻪﺩﺭﻃﻮﻝﺟﻨﮓ،ﻟﻴﺒﻲﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪﺗﺴﻠﻴﺤﺎﺗﻲﺍﺯﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﻛﺮﺩ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱﺍﻳﻦﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭﭘﻴﺸﺒﺮﺩﻣﺎﺩﺭﺟﻨﮓﻧﻘﺶﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﮔـﺮ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳـﻌﺶ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ
ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻳﺎﺭﮔﻴــﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻳﺎﺭﺍﻥ
ﺑﻲﺧﺎﺻﻴﺖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻴﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ -ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻲ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻋﺮﺑﻲ -ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻲ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ
ﻋﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻳﻤﻦ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻲ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺎ
ﻳﻚ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒــﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻳﻜﭙﺎﺭﭼﻪ ﺩﺭﻛﻨــﺎﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ -ﻓﺎﺭﺳــﻲ
ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻄـﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ،ﺑﺤﺚ
ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ
ﺩﺭ ﺳـﺎﻝ 1980ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﻫﺴـﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻋـﺮﺍﻕ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳـﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ
ﻣﺠﻬﺰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺩ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺰﺩ.
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ
ﺳﻼﺡ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻦﮔﻮﺭﻳﻦ
ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻴﻮﭘﻲ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ .ﻟﺬﺍ
ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﻘﺼـﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﺸـﺘﺮﻙ ،ﻣﻨﻔﻌـﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﻣﺪﺕ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ
ﻭ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺷــﺪ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﺳــﻂ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ .ﺳﺎﻝ 1973ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻴﻦ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻋﺮﺍﺏ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻴﭗ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻜﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺨﻮﺭﺩﻧــﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻫﻴﭻﻧﻴــﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﻌﺜﻲﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺸﺪ.
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ
ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ
ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻣﺪ
107
ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ 8ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻫﻴﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻓﺮ -ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺁﺟﻮﺭﻟﻮ
ﻧﺴـﻞ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭﺍﻡﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻧﺴـﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻧﻴﺴـﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﺴﻞ ﺩﻭﻣﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴـﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﻴﺴـﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺍﻥ ﻧﻮﻳﻨﻲ
ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻧﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ؛ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻬﺮ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺒﻖ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺴـﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳـﺒﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﺎﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻋﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺴﻞ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ .ﻣﺤﺴـﻦ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻭﺝ ﭘﺨﺘﮕﻲ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺳﺮﺷـﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻏﺬ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺣﻚ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺒﻖ
ﺳـﭙﺎﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﻴﺴﺖﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﻳﻚﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺗﺸـﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﻪﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻟﻤﺸﻐﻮﻟﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻭﻱ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﻬﺖ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺣﻤﺎﺳﻪ ﻫﺸﺖﺳـﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳـﺒﻖ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺐ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺳـﻜﻮﻧﺘﺶ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻃﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻣﻼﻳﻤﺎﺕ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﺸﺖﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﻣﺰﮔﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﺬﻳـﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣـﻪ ﻃﻲ ﺳـﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷـﺘﻪ
ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﻫـﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣـﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺧﻄﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ
ﺍﻧﺘﺸـﺎﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺣﺮﻓﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺸــﺮﻭﻁ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻓﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻜﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻲﺩﺭﭘﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ﺣﺎﻻ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺻﺪﻭﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺷﺪ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﻟﻴﻠﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺨﻔﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﭼﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺗﻴﺮﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻝ 1366ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪ ﺩﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ.
ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺧﺮ ﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺧﺴــﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ
ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺮﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ
108
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺍﺳﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴـﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ( ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺧﻮﺏ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺷﻜﺴـﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ؟
ﺁﻥ ﺗﻌﺒﻴـﺮ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ( ﻣﺒﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻮﺷـﻴﺪﻥ ﺟـﺎﻡ ﺯﻫﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ
ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ( ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺟﺎﻡ ﺯﻫﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﺑﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻣﺮﺗﺐ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ
ﺟﺴــﺪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺟﻨﺎﺯﻩ 598ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ .ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲﻛﻪ 598ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ 598ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺰﺍﻳﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺿﻤﺎﻧﺘﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ 598ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﻢ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺟﻮ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺴـﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ؟ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ
ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴـﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ.
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑـﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺷﺪﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﺳــﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ .ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺗﻲ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺕ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﻫــﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻣﺮﺗﺐ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ.
ﭘﺲ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳـﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻣـﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ(ﻳﻚ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ؟ ﻫﺮﭼﻨـﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺷـﺪ ﺍﻣـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺴﻚ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺴﻚ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺟﺎﻡﺯﻫﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ
ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ 598ﺑﻮﺩ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣـﺎﻡ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺣﻤﻼﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺷﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻡﺯﻫﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷﻴﺪ
ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺑﺪﻱ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ( ﭼﻪ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺸﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ؛ ﺍﻣــﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺰﻭ
ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺬﻳــﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﻃﻔﻲ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺗﺸﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ
ﻭ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺷــﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲ
ﻭﻗﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩژﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﭘﻴﻜﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ 6ﻳﺎ 7ﺳﺮﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ
1000ﻳﺎ 2000ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺒﺮﻳﺰ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺸﻬﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻢﺗﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
109
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺗﻠﺦ ﻣﺎﻗﺒﻞ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣـﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻠﻪ .ﻣــﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺎﺿــﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺎﺻﺮﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ
ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ
ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺻﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺗﺎ 30ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮﻱ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻧﺸﺎﻩ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻢ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ
ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺎﺻﺮﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻳﻢ .ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺩﻳﭙﻠﻤﺎﺳﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪﻡ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﻤﻠــﻪ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺼﺮﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺟﻠــﻮﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑﺗﺮ ﻧﺮﻭﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﺷــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻌﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﻣﺠﺪﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻣﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﺻﻠﺢ ﻫﻢ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﺶ
598ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑﺗﺮ ﻧﺮﻭﻳﺪ .ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺳــﻪﺭﻭﺯ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺻﻠﺤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﺻــﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ.
598ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻜﻞ 598ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؟ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻫﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ( ﻧﻮﺷــﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﭼﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ» :ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺎﺩﻡ ﻭ ﭘﺸﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ «.ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﺠﻨﮕﻴــﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﭘﺸﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﻫﺪﻑ ﻗﺎﻃﻊ ﻛﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ.
ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺸﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻭ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻞ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ.
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻫﺎﺷــﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻨﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔــﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺩﺭ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﺬﻳـﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻋﺎﺩﻻﻧﻪ
ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺷـﻤﺎ
ﺻﻠﺢ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻣﻮﺿـﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺍﺧـﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ؟
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻭ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭘﻨﺞﺳﺎﻝ
ﺧﻮﺵﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﺧﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ.
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻲ ﺷﺪ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳــﻢ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ،
ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻪﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ؟
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.ﻟﺬﺍﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺗــﺎ ﺗﺴــﻠﻴﻢ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺻــﺪﺍﻡ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱﻣﺎﺭﺍﺩﺭﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﺩ.
ﻃﻮﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻳﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﻲ
ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻓﻼﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﻮﺛﺮﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻢ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺷـﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ
110
ﻋﻀـﻮ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫـﺎﻱ ﻣﺸـﺘﺮﻛﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ
ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ( ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﻻﻳﺘﻲ ،ﻇﻬﻴﺮﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ،
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ.
ﭼﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﻫﻴــﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﻭ ﺷــﻔﺎﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻟــﻲ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﺑﺎﺯ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺷـﺨﺺ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻘــﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒــﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ( ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﭘﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺳـﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﻏﻨﻲﺯﻧﺠﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﭘﻮﻝ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ؟
ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣــﻪ 598ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺎﺟﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﺗﺐ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺧﺮﺍﺏ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺿﻤﺎﻧﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺻــﺪﺍﻡ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺬﻳــﺮﺵ 598ﻭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻴﻜﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ
ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺎﺻﺮﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺁﻗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻠﻔﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎ ﻣﺤﺴــﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ .ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻃﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺰﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ 598
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺎﺻﺮﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ( ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺳــﻘﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻡﺯﻫﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﻧﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻢﺗﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷﺪ.
ﻟﺸﻜﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺣﻴﺎ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ 598ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺍﺣﻴﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨــﺪ .ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺻﺎﺩﻗﺎﻧﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ» :ﻣﻦ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ«.
ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻡﺯﻫﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﺷﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺗﺤﻮﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻧﺸــﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻳﻚ
ﻓﺎﺟﻌﻪ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻫﺸﺖﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 5ﺗﺎ 10ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺍﺭﺯﻱ ،ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺭﻳﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺤﺜـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄـﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳـﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨـﮓ ﻭﺟـﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﻓﻴﻖﺩﻭﺳـﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﻨﺪﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻣﺒﻨﻲﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻴﺒﻲ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺭﻓﻴﻖﺩﻭﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﻟﺠﺴﺘﻴﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻟﻴﺒﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﻣﻴـﻦ ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﻩﺷـﻤﺎﻟﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ؟
ﺑﺎ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺳـﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺻﻨﺎﻳـﻊ ﻧﻈﺎﻣـﻲ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺻﻨﺎﻳﻊ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﺪ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﻘﻮﻁ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﻴﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻴﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺒﺪﻳــﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻋﺘﻘــﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻤﻲﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ.
ﻃﻮﺭﻱﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﭙﺎﻩ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ،ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﺪﻓﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺳﺮ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ؟
ﻧﺮﺳــﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿــﻮﻉ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭼﻨﺪ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻧﺸــﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺣﺠﺐ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﺮﺳــﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺗﺰﻟﺰﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ
ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﻋﻜﺲ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻫﺪﻑ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﻮﺵﺑﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪ
ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﻣﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ؟
ﻳــﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﺯﻧــﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ
ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ .ﺁﺭﺍﻡﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﺍﻭﻟﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻧﺴﻞ ﺳﻮﻣﻲﻫﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺑــﻪ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻋــﻮﺽ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻭﻟﻲﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﻧﺪ؛ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺣــﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭﺍﻥ
ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻗــﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺁﻥ ﺣﺎﺩﺛــﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻣﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ .ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭼﺘﺮ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻗﺎﺑــﺖ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪﺍﻱ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘــﺎﺩ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜــﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻣﻲﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﻭﻟﻲﻫﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ(
ﻋﻠﺖ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ
ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﻭﻟﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ
ﺗﺪﺍﻋﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﻳﻮﺳــﻒ
ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﻴﺮ
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﭘﺎﺩﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﭼﻪ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﺮﻓﺖ
ﺍﺗﻔــﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ
111
ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻲ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ 28ﺳﺎﻝ ﺳﻦ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ
ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺏ ﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ 8ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ
ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻥ
ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ
ﻧﻔﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﺳﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻔﺮﺍﺕ
ﺩﻫﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍﻫﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﻡ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﺸﺎﻥ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﻧﺴﻞ
ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﺩﻫﻪ
ﺳــﻮﻡ،
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺩﻫﻪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ 30ﺳﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ
ﻗﺒـﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻳـﺪ ﺟﺮﻳـﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ
ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳـﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴـﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻧﺪ
ﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺷﻤﺎﻣﻲﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﻴﺪ؟ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﻼﺋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺁﻗــﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺰﻧﻴﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﺍﻭﻟﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻋﻴﻨﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1362ﺧﻴﺒﺮ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺋﻤﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ
ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺳــﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ» :ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ
ﺷﻨﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ 7 .ﺗﺎ 8ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ؟ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻫﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺟﺴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺩ ﺷﻮﻳﺪ«.
ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻗﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺮﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺳﻮﻱ ،ﻫﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻫﻢﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺟﻤﻌﻪ .ﺍﻭ ﺁﺩﻡ
ﻫﺎﺷﻤﻲﺭﻓﺴﻨﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻃﻖﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺴــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺩﻫــﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﮔﺎﺭﺩ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﺩﻭﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺻﺮﻑ
5ﺗﺎ 6ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ :ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺷــﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺮﻳﺰﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺳﻜﻮﻻﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺜﻞ ﭘﺘﻜﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﭼـﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﭘـﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺴــﻞﺍﻭﻟﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻧﺴﻞﺍﻭﻟﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜــﺮﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻃــﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨــﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ﻭ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿــﻮﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘــﺎﻝ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ
ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪﻳﻢ.
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﺑﺪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ.
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔـﺖ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻢ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ .ﻧﺴﻞﺍﻭﻟﻲﻫﺎ
ﺻﻤﻴﻤﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨــﺎﺭ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺤــﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘــﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨــﺶ ﻛﻨــﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫــﺎﻱ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺤﻨــﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻳﺮ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑــﻪ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
112
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻓــﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﭘﻴــﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺳــﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﺎﻧﻪ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﺴﺎﺩﺕ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ .ﺣﺴﺎﺩﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺸﺖ
ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﺮﺳــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻇﻠﻢ ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﻧﻔﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻔﺮﺍﺕ ﺭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﺩﻭﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﮕﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ 30ﺳــﺎﻝ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﻓﻘﻂ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﺒﺎﻑ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻲ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻴــﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳــﻖ ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻨﺎﻇﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺎﻗﻠﻲ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﭼﻲ؟ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ
ﺑﻲﻋﻘﻞﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻛﻢ ﻋﻘﻞﺍﻧﺪ.
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺴـﻞ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳـﻜﻮﻱ
ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﻗﺘــﻲ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺭﻭﺳــﺘﺎ
ﻭ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﻬﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﺎﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ .ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻳﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻧﺴـﻞ
ﺩﻭﻣﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ؟
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺣﺎﺿــﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳــﻮﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻭﺑﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨــﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻣﺤﺴﻦﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ:
ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺐ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻘﻠﺒﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﺴـﻦ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ،ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻐﺾ ﻭ ﺣﺴـﺮﺕ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﻋﺎﺻﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺪﻧﻲ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﺒﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻧﺎﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﺍﺳﻤﺎﻋﻴﻠﻲ ،ﻋﻀﻮ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﺷﻨﻲ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻌــﻢ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻩ ،ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ
ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﺍﺩﺭﻛﺸﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻣﻈﻠﻮﻣﻴﺖ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻘﺪﺭ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺻﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ »ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻱ« ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻮﺵﺑﻴﻨﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﮔﻨﺞ ﺗﺸﺒﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ،ﺣﺮﻑ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻟﻲ
ﻣﻦ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ ،ﻣﻌﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﮔﻨﺞ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻨﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻡ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﮔﻨﺞ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺨﻔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﻪ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ
ﻣﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺼﺮﻓــﺶ ﻛﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺪﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ،ﭼﻨﺪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻌﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻧﺎﺷــﺪﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪﻩ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﻧﺮژﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ .ﺩﻭﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻦ
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴــﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﻋﺪﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟
ﻣﻦ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺭﺳــﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻲ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺜﻼ ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﺳــﻄﻮﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭﻱ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ؛ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ
ﻣﻠﻜﻮﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﺳــﺘﺮﺱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻘﺼﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﻧﺸﺪﻧﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻛﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺖ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﻣــﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ،ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻟﻮﺩﮔﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺑﻠﺪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ .ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻮﺭﻩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺼﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ(
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻳﻢ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻮﺭ ﺁﺩﻣﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ
ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺑﻠﺪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ .ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ(
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛﻮﺭﻩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺼﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺳــﺮﺗﺎﭘﺎ ﻧﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺧﺐ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺪﺍﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺣــﺎﻻ ﻣﺎ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻬــﺎ ﭼــﻜﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻳــﻢ؟ ﻣــﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻫﺸﺖ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ،ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺷــﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﺸــﺮ ﺷــﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺳــﻤﻲ
ﻣﺎﻧﻮﺭ ﺗﺠﻤﻞ ﻭ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺳــﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻘﺐﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺩﻟﺴــﻮﺯ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ،ﺭﻭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻭﻗﺘﺶ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﻋﻘﺐﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻲﺗﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺒــﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨــﻲ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻘﺐﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺯﺣﻤﺖ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﻭﻗــﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﺟﻨــﮓ .ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻭﻗﺘــﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻮﺭ ﺗﺠﻤﻞ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﻛﺮﻱ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺏ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ.
ﻳﻚ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ »ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﻋﻘﺐﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻋﻤﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣــﺎ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ «.ﺑﻪ ﻫــﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ،ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻳﻚ ﻋﺪﻩ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺳﻮﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻧﺴﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺖ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ
ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﭘﻴﺸﻜﺴــﻮﺗﺎﻥ
ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﭻ ﻭ ﺧﻢ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ،ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺳــﺮﺍﻍ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯﻱ ﻓﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ
ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻬﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻧﺸﺪﻧﺪ.
113
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﮔﺴﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺪﻥ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻳﻢ،
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻓﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻐﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻱ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺯﻭﺩ
ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻏﺼﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﺟﺎﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺪﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺷــﻨﺎﺱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﻛﺸــﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻛﺲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺪ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﭘﻨﺠﻪ ﻧﺮﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺗﺼــﻮﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻤﺎﻋﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﮕﺸﺖﺷــﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﭘﺸﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ؟
ﻣــﻦ ،ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ،ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺝ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺏ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﺭﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺪﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻳﻚ
ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﺎ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﻴﻠﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ؟ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﺎ ،ﺭﻭﺳــﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺟﻤﻌﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺴــﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪﺷﺎﻥ
ﻃﻌﻢ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﭼﺸــﻴﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ،ﺟﻨــﮓ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ
ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ .ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻲﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻮﺱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭ ﻓﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺸﺪ )ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﺸﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ( ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻻﻥ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﺧﺒﺮ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﻓﺘــﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺑﻲﻣﻬﺮﻱ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎﻭﻩﮔﻮ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺣﺴـﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ .ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺤﺚ ﭼﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻠﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻓـﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣـﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ؟ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﻇﺐ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻘﻠﺒﻲ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ؛ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺸﺖ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ.ﺍﻻﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﺗﻘﻠﺒﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﺩﻡ ﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻣﻰ ﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻰ ﺯﻧﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺗﻘﻠﺒﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻋﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻳﻚ
ﺧﻄﺎﻱ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳــﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ
ﺟﻨــﮓ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨــﮓ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻣﺪﻳــﻢ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻤﻞﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﺩﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ؛ ﻳﻜﻲ ،ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻃﻠﺐﻫﺎ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ
ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺟﻠﻮ .ﺩﻭﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﺍﻧﺰﻭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺑــﺎﺏ ﺗﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﻏﻠﻂ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺰﻭﻱ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﻴﺪﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ.
114
ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴــﺪ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳــﺮﺍﻍ
ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﻓﻖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻳﺎﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺧﻠﻮﺹ ،ﭘﺸﺘﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﺪﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﺝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ.
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷـﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ،ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﻴﻔﺘﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ،
ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ )ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ( ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ ،ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻳﻢ ،ﻏﻠﻂ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ
ﻋﻘﺐﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩﻳﻢ،
ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﻏﻠﻂ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺩﻛﺘﺮ! ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﺖ ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﺋﺎﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﻣﺼﻄﻠﺢ ﻣﺤﻞ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷـﺖ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻋﺮﻓﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻥ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻛـﺮﺩ؟ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ؟ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ
ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ؟ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﻧــﺪﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴــﺮ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ؟ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ؟ﻣﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺷــﺪﻩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻣــﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﭼﺮﺍ
ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﺭﺟﺎﺋﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﮕــﻮ ﻧﺎﻣﺶ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺍﺳــﺖ؟ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ؟ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻣﺪﺍﺭﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺑﻬﺸﺘﻲ .ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﺗﺠﺴﻢ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻃﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻳــﻢ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪ.
ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﺳــﺎﻧﺪ .ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺤﺚ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ.
ﺍﻻﻥ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻧﺴـﻞ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ 20ﺗﺎ 30ﺳﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ.
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺎﺳــﺖ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﭙﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻨﺘﻬﺎ ﻟﻮﺍﺯﻡ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺩﺳــﺖ
ﺑﺰﻧﻴﻢ .ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺭﺍﻳــﺞ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ،ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻫﺴﺖ.
ﺍﺩﺍﻣـﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻧـﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺴـﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻛﻤﻲ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺩﺑﻴﺮﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺷﻤﺎﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺼﻴﺒﺖ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺍﺻﻼ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺳﺖﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻲ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻦ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺳــﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﮕﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﺁﻭﻳﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ؟ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻫﺴﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ؟ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ
ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ،ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ،
ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﺍﺵ
ﺑﺎﺯﮔــﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﭘﺪﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺭ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ .ﺣﺮﻑ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺪﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ.
ﻣﺎ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺷــﺪﻳﻢ .ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻳﻚ ﻋﺎﺭﺿــﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ .ﺗﻠــﺦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺷــﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪﻳﻢ ،ﺷــﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ .ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺟﺎﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﻞ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﺯ ﺷﺐﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
115
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ:
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻼﻣﺖ ﺳﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺣﺴـﻴﻦ ﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﮔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺷـﻬﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺳـﻴﺪﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻱﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﻫﻢ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺯﺭﻳﺒﺎﻓﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺿﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻖ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ.ﺩﺭﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﺑﺎﺁﻗﺎﻱﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱﺟﻨﮓ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝﺑﻴﻦﻧﺴﻠﻲﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥﻭﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲﺟﻨﮓﻣﻮﺭﺩﺑﺤﺚ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺖ.ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﺑﺎﺳﺮﺩﺍﺭﺩﻫﻘﺎﻥﺩﺭﺩﻓﺘﺮﺍﻭﺩﺭﻣﺮﻛﺰﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕﺩﻓﺎﻋﻲﺻﻮﺭﺕﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ.
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻤﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻳﻚ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ 15ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ
42ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻭﺍﺣــﺪﻱ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻳﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﻬﻀﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ
ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﭼﺎﺭﭼــﻮﺏ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﺸــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﻭ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ
ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻭﻝ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻋﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ،ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﮔﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻭ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ »ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ« ﻭ »ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ« ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻪ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻫﻢ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ
ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻃﺎﻟﺐ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﻛﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺖ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﺍﺳﻼﻡ« ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻧﻬﻀﺖ ﻫﻢ
ﺷﺪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺩﻭﺍﺭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( )ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﻧﻬﻀــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ( ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻗﻠﻴﻦ ﺍﻓــﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻘﺶ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ
ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺷﻮﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺑﻂ ﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﺳﻂ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳﻤﻴﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﻬﺪﺍ ﺑﺰﻧﻴﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻠﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ
ﺑﻬﺸﺖﺯﻫﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﺩ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻠﺰﺍﺭ ﺷﻬﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ،
ﺩﺍﻧﺶﺁﻣــﻮﺯ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻣﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻘﺎﻣــﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﺸــﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻭﺵ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ؛ ﻧﻪ ،ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻬﻢ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺟﻨﮓ،
ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻘﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ
116
ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻃﺮﻕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﺖ
ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻠﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﻗﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﻠﺖﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻘﺪﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻢ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺿـﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ ،ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷـﻤﻮﻝﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﺑﺴـﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀـﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﻳـﻒ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ،ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻨﺪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ .ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﺒﺮﻳﺪ
ﺑﻬﺸﺖ ﺯﻫﺮﺍ.
ﺑﻠﻪ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﺍﻣـﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻋﻠﺘﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﻂ
ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺴــﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻫﻢ ﺳــﻄﻮﺡ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻭ
ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻳﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺁﺣﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻳﺪ .ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩﻩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪﺗﻤﺎﻡﺁﺣﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡﺩﺭﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﺟﻨﮓﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.ﻳﻜﻲ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩﻩ،
ﻳﻜﻲ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺮ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﻧﻘﺸﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﻂ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﺪ،
ﺍﻳﻦﻃﻮﺭﻧﻴﺴﺖﻛﻪﻫﻤﻪﺩﺭﺑﺨﺶﺧﺎﺻﻲﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ.ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﺟﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱﻣﺎﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦﺣﻀﻮﺭﺭﺍﺩﺭﺟﻨﮓﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪﻭﺍﻳﻦﻫﻢﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ؛ ﺍﻧﻌﻄﻼﻑﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱﺷﺎﻥ ،ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺳﻨﻲﺷﺎﻥ
ﻭ ...ﻭﻟﻲﻓﺮﺩﻱﻛﻪﺍﺯﻳﻚﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﺑﻪﺟﺒﻬﻪﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡﺷﺪﻩ،ﭘﺪﺭ،ﻣﺎﺩﺭ،ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮ
ﻭ ﺍﻗﻮﺍﻣﺶ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻫﻤﺴﺮﻱ ،ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﺳﺘﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻫﻤﻪﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕﻧﺎﺷﻲﺍﺯﺟﻨﮓﺭﺍﺑﻪﺟﺎﻥﻣﻲﺧﺮﺩ.ﭘﺲﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩﮔﻔﺖﻛﻪ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﻓﺎﺭﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺑﻔﺮﻣﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ
ﻣﺎﻳﻞ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻫﻤﺴــﺮﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵﺑﻪﺟﺒﻬﻪﺑﺮﻭﺩ،ﻣﻤﻜﻦﺍﺳﺖﺷﻬﻴﺪﺷﻮﺩ،ﻣﺠﺮﻭﺡﺷﻮﺩﻭﺑﻌﺪ
ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯﻟﻘﺐﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻛﻪﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵﺑﻪ
ﺟﻨﮓﺑﺮﻭﺩ،ﺩﺭﻭﺍﻗﻊﺩﺭﺟﻨﮓﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖﻛﺮﺩﻩ.ﺍﻳﻦﺧﺎﻧﻢﻫﻢﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻋﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺯﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡﺳﺠﺎﺩ)ﻉ(ﺗﻮﺟﻪﻛﻨﻴﺪﻳﺎﺑﻪﺳﺨﻦﺍﻣﺎﻡﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ(ﻛﻪﻣﻲﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺪ»:ﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ،ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﭘﺸﺖ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ «.ﭘﺲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻱ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺧﺎﺻﻲﺍﺯﻣﺮﺩﻡﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪﻭﺑﺎﺟﻨﮓﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.ﺩﺭﺟﺒﻬﻪﻣﺎﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ
70ﺳﺎﻟﻪﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢﻭﻧﻮﺟﻮﺍﻥ 14،13ﺳﺎﻟﻪﻫﻢﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ؛ﻣﺜﻼﻛﺴﻲﻣﺜﻞ
ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ 19ﺗﺎ 27 ، 25ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺑﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻛﺮﻣﺎﻧﺸﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺷﺪ،
ﺩﺯﻓﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻼﻡ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺶ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ
ﻛﻪ 20ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﻓﻀﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ؟ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻦ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻲ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﺪﺑﻴﻨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﻣﻠﺖﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻠﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ
ﻣﻦ ،ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﮕﻴــﺮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ
ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ
ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚ
ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴــﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻄﻠﺒﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺳﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ :ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ
ﺩﺭﭼﻪﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲﺣﺎﺿﺮﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩﺟﺎﻥﺧﻮﺩﺵﺭﺍﻛﻪﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺵ
ﺍﺳﺖ،ﺳﻼﻣﺖﺧﻮﺩﺵﺭﺍﻛﻪﺑﺎﺍﺭﺯﺵﺗﺮﻳﻦﺍﺳﺖ،ﺑﺎﺧﻮﺩﺑﻪﺟﻨﮓﺑﺒﺮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭﻭﺍﻗﻊﺧﻮﺩﺵﺭﺍﺩﺭﭼﻨﻴﻦﻋﺮﺻﻪﺍﻱﺑﻪﻋﺮﺿﻪﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ.ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻣﻦﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲﻛﻪﻣﻠﻲﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺑﻪﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞﻛﺸﻮﺭﺷﺎﻥﻧﮕﺎﻩﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ،
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳــﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﻲﺍﺭﺯﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳــﻼﻣﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ.
ﺧﺐ ،ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳﻢ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ؟ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺮﺳﻴﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ،ﻫﺮ
ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺭﺯﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ،
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺧﻄﺮ
ﻭﺑﺮﺍﻱﺭﻓﻊﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﻱﻛﻪﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺭﺍﺩﺭﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ،ﺩﺭﻫﻤﺎﻥﻣﻘﻄﻊﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺞ ،ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﻭ ...ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﺠﻠﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻣﻨﻔﺼﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺎﻻﺗﻤﺎﻡﺷﺪﻩﺍﻣﺎﻣﻄﻠﺐﮔﻔﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩﺍﻳﻦﻧﺒﻮﺩ.ﻣﺎﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﺭﺍ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﻣﻌﻨﺎﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢﻭﺍﮔﺮﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺩﺭﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﻓﺮﺩﻱﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ،ﺧﺐﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱﻣﻌﻨﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؛ﻳﻌﻨﻲﺗﻼﺵﻭﺟﻬﺎﺩ.ﻣﺎﺑﺎﻳﺪﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺟﻨﮓﺭﺍﺩﺭﻛﺎﺭ
ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﻣﺘﺠﻠﻲﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ.ﻧﻪﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﻫﺮﺩﻭﺭﻩﺭﺍﺑﺮﺵﺑﺰﻧﻴﻢﻭﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ
ﺧﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻼﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ .ﻓﻼﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﻛﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺯﻳﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﻛﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦﻣﻠﺖﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺗﻲﺩﺭﺳﺖﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪﺗﺎﺑﺮﺍﻱﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟ﺧﺐ،
ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ؛ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ،ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪﻭﺗﻤﺎﻡﺷﺪﻭﺭﻓﺖ.ﻧﻪ.ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢﻣﻠﺘﻲﺩﺭﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﻣﻐﺎﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ .ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻣﻠﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ
ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﺪﻛﻪﺭﻭﺯﻱﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲﺑﻪﺟﻨﮓﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪﻭﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺟﻬﺎﺩﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ،ﺗﺎﺑﻘﻴﻪﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﺑﻪﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺍﻳﻦﺭﺍﺑﻪﺧﻮﺑﻲﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.ﭘﺲﺍﮔﺮﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦﭘﺎﺳﺦﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﺩﻳﻦ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪﻛﺎﺭﻱﻛﻨﺪﻛﻪﺍﮔﺮﺍﻭﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﺑﻮﺩ،ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.ﻳﻌﻨﻲﻣﺎﺑﺎﻳﺪﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﺭﻭﺣﻲﻭﺫﻫﻨﻲﺭﺍﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩﻛﻨﻴﻢﻛﻪﻫﺮﻣﻘﻄﻌﻲﺍﺯﺯﻣﺎﻥ،ﻫﺮﻗﺸﺮﺍﺯ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻣﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺖﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎ
ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻳﻢﺍﻳﻦﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﮕﻲﺭﺍﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻳﻢﻭﺁﻥﺭﺍﺑﻪﺑﻘﻴﻪﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﻳﺎ ﺳــﻌﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻨﻮﻳﺴﻴﻢ .ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ،
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻣﺸﺨﺺﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩﻛﻪﻣﺎﭘﻴﺎﻡﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱﺭﺍﺑﺮﺍﻱﻳﻚﺣﻴﺎﺕﻃﻴﺒﻪ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢﺩﺭﻗﺎﻟﺐﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ،ﺑﻴﺎﻥ،ﺩﺭﻗﺎﻟﺐﺳﻨﺒﻞﻫﺎﻭﻧﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲﻛﻪ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻳﻒ
ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ.ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻣﻦ،ﻣﺸﻜﻞﻣﺎﺍﻳﻦﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ؟
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ،
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ...
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻴـﻢ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﺩﻡﻫـﺎﻱ ﺧـﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻭ...
ﻳﺎﺟﻨﮓﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕﺧﻮﺩﺵﺭﺍﺩﺍﺭﺩﻭﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱﺑﻌﺪﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕﺧﻮﺩﺵﺭﺍ.ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢﺍﻳﻦﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚﻧﻴﺴﺖﺍﺯﺣﻴﺎﺕﻳﻚﻣﻠﺖ.
ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣــﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﭼﻪ
ﺟﻮﺭﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺣﺠﻤﺶ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺻﻼ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻡ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻛﺸــﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ؟ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ
ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ....
ﻣــﺎ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺯﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻴــﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻃﻠﺒﻴﺪﻩ .ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻧﻪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎﺭﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ
ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ؛ ﭘﺲ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﻧﻪ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺎ،
ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ ،ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﻍ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷﻲ ﺭﺍ.
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺩﻭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺗﻜﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺨﻮﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨــﮓ ،ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ،
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ »ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ« ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺴـﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﮔﺸـﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ
ﺩﻭﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺷﻬﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬـﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻨﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﺮﺳـﻴﻤﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻗﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ
ﻧﺴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ .ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ،ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺧﺐ ،ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻤﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺖ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩﻩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻳﻢ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﻴﺮ
ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺷﺘﺎﺑﺎﻥﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺍﻳﻨﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮﻋﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺖﺳــﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻳﻢ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳـﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻫﻢ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷـﻜﻞ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﻀﻮ
ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪﺍﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭﺗﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ .ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ
ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؛ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﺪﻑ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻫﺪﻑ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ...ﻣﺎ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ،ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﻼﻣﺖ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ.
117
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﻧﻮﺣﻪ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻳﻢ ،ﺷﺐ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ
ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺷﻤﺨﺎﻧﻲ
ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ :ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻨﻲﺻﺪﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻮﺍ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﻲﺻﺪﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺘﻲ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺶ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﻛﻨﻴﻢ :ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱ ،ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ،ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ،ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ.
ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ 12ﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺳﻪ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﻚ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ .ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ،
ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺳﻪ ﻓﺎﻛﺘﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺶ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻞ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺑﻼ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎ ﻣﺤﻞ
ﻣﺴــﻜﻮﻧﻲ ﻋﺮﺏﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻫﺪﻑ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ
ﻏﺮﺏ ﻭ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﭘﺪﺍﻓﻨﺪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ
ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺁﻓﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺳــﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ
ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﭘﺪﺍﻓﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ،ﺩﻭﺭﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﻜﺼﺪ ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮﻱ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﺁﺗﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ
ﻏﺮﺏ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻧﻪ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ :ﺣﺰﺏ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻛﻮﻣﻠﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺎ 9ﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ،ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ،
118
ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ،ﺍﻧﺪﻳﻤﺸﻚ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﻤﺸﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ
ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﺩﻫﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﭘﺪﺍﻝ ﮔﺎﺯ ﺗﺎﻧﻚ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﺪ،
ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﻳــﺪ ﮔﺎﺯ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ؟ ﺳﻬﻞ
ﺑﻮﺩ؟ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺳﻬﻞ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﻣﺤﻞ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﻭ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺎﻟﻚ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ
ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ »ﺩﺏ ﺣﺮﺩﺍﻥ« ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ
ﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺘﺪ .ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﻮﻱ ﺫﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺑﺨﻮﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ
ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺘــﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺳــﻨﮕﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻮﻳﺰﻩ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺘﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺴــﺮ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﻱ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ.
ﺗﭙﻪﻫــﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻲ ﮔﺮﻩ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺸــﺪﺍﻍ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﭘــﻞ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ .ﺍﻭ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺘﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪﻱ ﺭﺧﻨﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺟﺎﻟﺒﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺳــﺮﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻨﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ،ﻳﺎ
ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻈﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻀﺒﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺽ ﺷﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺩﺭﺱ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ
ﻟﺸــﻜﺮ 92ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺩﺳﺮ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﻴﭙﺶ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻟﺸﻜﺮ 77ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻗﺴــﻤﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ
ﺫﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻟﺸﻜﺮ 21ﮔﺎﺭﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻏﻠﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ـ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ـ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﮕﻴــﺮﺩ؛ ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﭘــﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺑــﺮﻭﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺗﺤﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﺨﺒﺎﺭﺍﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺑﻨﻲﺻﺪﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ:
»ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻡ .ﻣﻦ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺳــﭙﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺯﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺁﻣﺪﻡ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪﺍﻱ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺑﻨﻲﺻــﺪﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣــﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣــﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻣﻲﻛــﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻨﻲﺻــﺪﺭ ﺑــﺎ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻬــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺠﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴــﺪ؟« ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻢ» :ﻣــﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﺮ
ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ «.ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﭘﻴــﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﺪ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺣﻤﻠــﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ «.ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻋﻠﺖ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳــﭙﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ .ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ )ﺭﻩ( ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛــﺮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ؟ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻋﻄﻔﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ
ﺗﺤﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻋﺘﺼﺎﺏ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻮﺯﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨــﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺗﻲ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝ 52ﻫﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺷــﺎﻩ ،ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻫﻢ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻨﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺜــﻼ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﺤــﻞ ﻭ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻔﻲ ﺭﺥ
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩ .ﻓﻘﻂ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ
ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴــﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺗﺮﺩﻳــﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻭﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ .ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ
ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻧــﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ
ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴــﺪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺘــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻬﺮﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻨــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺗﺤﺮﻙ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻛﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﭼﭗ ،ﺍﺗﺤــﺎﺩ ،ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻖ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ
ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ؛ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻘﻴﻦ ﺧﻠﻖ
ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺑﻲﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺗﻮﺣﻴﺪﻱ ،ﺣﺰﺏ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﻬﺰ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ.
ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺭﺳــﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻂ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﺎ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ؟! ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻛﺠﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ؛ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ،
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ .ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﺳﻪ ﻟﺸــﻜﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ
ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﺩﮔﺎﻥ ﺩژ ،ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ 33ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ
ﺫﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺟﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ -ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻗﻄﻊ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺣﻤﺎﺳــﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺎﻃﻔﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺷﻤﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻳﺶ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺩ ﺧﻤﭙﺎﺭﻩ 60ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻫﺸﻬﺮ
ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻟﻨﺞ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ.
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺷﺎﻩ
ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﺷﻨﺒﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﻭ ...ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﻭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻨﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺼﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻋﺮﺏ،
ﺍﻣــﺎ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ
ﻳﻜــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺼﻠﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ؛ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﺸــﻮﺩ
ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺯﺳــﺘﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﺠــﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﻟﺬﺍ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣــﺎﺕ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷــﺎﺥ ﻭ ﺑﺮگ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ .ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺧﻮﺯﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ 57ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ
ﺑﻤﺐﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺎﻣﻊ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻧﻔﺖ ،ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ
ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧــﻞ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ
ﺷــﻔﺎﻑ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻘﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣــﺎ ﺧﻂ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ ﺧﻂ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺷــﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺗﺎﻕﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺕ
ﺍﺷﺮﻑ ،ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻣﺎﺋﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ...
ﻫﻤﺰﻣــﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺤــﺮﻛﺎﺕ ﻣــﺮﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺸــﺘﻲ
ﺭﺯﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ژﺍﻧﺪﺍﺭﻣﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﺍﺭﺗــﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺍﺭﺗــﺶ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭﻡ
ﻟﺸﻜﺮ 92ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻣﺮﺗﺐ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺍﺭ
ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻣﻼﻁ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺘﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻭ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﺑــﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭﻳــﻪ ﻟﺸــﻜﺮ 77ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺫﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﮔﺎﺭﺍژﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻓﺎﻣﻴﻠﻲﺍﺵ ﺫﻭﺍﻟﻔﻘﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﺁﺩﻡ
ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺗﺤﻮﻟــﻲ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ
ﻣﻮﺛﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻒ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠــﺎ ﺗﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻮﻳﺰﻩ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺳﻨﮕﺮﺩ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻃــﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳــﺪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﭘﻞ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﻳــﻪ ،ﺍﺯ ﭘﻞ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﻳﻪ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺷﺒﻴﺨﻮﻥ ﺯﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺴﺮ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﻱ
ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ(1 :
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ (2ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ .ﻟﺬﺍ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﺎﺯ ﺗﺎﻧﻚ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺣﺮﻛــﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﺮﻣﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱ ،ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﻭ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ
ﻓﺸــﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪﻭﻟﻲﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻭﻱﺑﻪﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲﺳــﺎﺑﻖﻧﻴﺴــﺖ.
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﻪ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺎﻛﺴــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺼﺮﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺘﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﺪ .ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ
ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؛ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺣﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑــﺮﻭﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠــﻪ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﻭ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﻭ
ﭼﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻲ ﺩﻭﺗﺎ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ (1 :ﻳﻚ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺑــﻮﺩ؛ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻫﻢ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ.
(2ﻳﻚ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺳــﻨﮕﺮﺩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﻴﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺴــﺮ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﭘﻞ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻳﻢ
ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻴﻢ .ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﭘﻞ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺤﺎﺻﺮﻩ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﺎﻫﺸــﻬﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻧــﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻭﻱ ،ﺗﻮﻗــﻒ ﻭ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺠﻢ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻭﻱ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻠﺢ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺳﻜﺘﻮﺭﻩ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ
ﺳﻨﮕﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺳﻪ
ﻣﻮﺗﻮﺭﻩ .ﺍﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺻﻠﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻧﻪ ﺻﻠﺢ .ﺻﻠﺢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ (1ﺩﺷﻤﻦ (2 ،ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ،
(3ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ (4 ،1975ﻏﺮﺍﻣﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ
ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸﺎﺕ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ،ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﺪ؟ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ؟ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ 200ﺳﺎﻝ
ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻗﺴــﻤﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﺍ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﺸــﺪ؟! ﭼــﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ
ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ 9ﻣﺎﻩ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ .ﻳﺎ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻱ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﺣﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ،
ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻴﻨﻪﺯﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ؛ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺤﻞ
ﺑﺤﺜﺶ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻭﻱ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻭﻱ ﻭ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸــﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻧﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻛﺴــﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﺶ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ،ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﺭﺟﺎﺋﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺳﻨﮕﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻡ.
ﺍﻭ ﺷﻚ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﺠﻨﮕﻴﻢ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺟﺎﺩﻩ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﻳﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺷــﺒﻴﺨﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻡ
ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻬــﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭﻟــﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻲ؟ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻔﻨﮓ ،ﻧﺎﺭﻧﺠﻚ ﻭ ﺁﺭﭘﻲ ﺟﻲ .ﻟﺬﺍ
ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺷﻤﺨﺎﻧﻲ
ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ ،ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﺁﻗﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺵ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ :ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ،ﻫﻮﻳﺰﻩ ،ﺟﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﺎﻫﺸــﻬﺮ -ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺑﻨﻲﺻﺪﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻮﺍ ﻋﺰﻝ ﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻭ ﺳــﭙﺎﻩ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؛ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺯﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻮﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻭ ﺳــﭙﺎﻩ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻮﺍ،
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺣﺼﺮ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ )ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺛﺎﻣﻦ ﺍﻻﺋﻤﻪ( ،ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖﺍﻟﻘﺪﺱ ،ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﺘﺢﺍﻟﻤﺒﻴﻦ ،ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﺖﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪﺱ )ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ( ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
119
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ– ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺮﺯ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻋﻼﻳﻰ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻋــﺮﺍﻕِ ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺣــﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴــﻢ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳــﻴﻢ .ﺳــﺎﻝ1968
) 1348ﺷﻤﺴﻲ( ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ
ﺩﺭ ﻋــﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ،ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ﺷﺪ .ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﭘﻴــﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﻋــﺮﺍﻕ ) ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺳــﺎﻝ (1933ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻗﻴﻤﻮﻣﺖ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ
ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ،ﺷــﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﺳﻨﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ
ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ 55ﺗﺎ 60ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺷﻴﻌﻴﺎﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ؛ ﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻨﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺁﻥ 20ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺳﻨﻲ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ
ﻏﺮﺏ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺳــﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺿﺪ ﺍﺳﻼﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ
ﺿﺪ ﺷــﻴﻌﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻣﻴــﺖ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺍﻭ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺍﻗﻮﺍﻡ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺳﻮﻡﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ
ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻫﻤﺒﺴــﺘﮕﻲ ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﻋﺮﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻞ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﺍﺵ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺿﺪﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﺣــﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷــﺪ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ.
ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻮﺍﻧــﻲ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﻌــﺚ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﺩ
ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻭ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻣﻲﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ
ﺣﺴﻦﺍﻟﺒﻜﺮ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺴــﺮﺧﺎﻟﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺬﻑ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﮕﻲ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﻙ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺧﺸﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺧﺸﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﺷــﻮﺧﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻛﺸﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣــﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ ﺳــﺎﻗﻂ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺩﻭ
ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺸــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴــﻢ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺻﺤﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻴﻜــﻦ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﻱ 600ـ 500ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﻔﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ :ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺭﺍ
ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﺪ ،ﺩﻳﺪﻳﺪ
ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻤﺒﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﮓ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻳﺪﻳﺪ .ﻫﻠﻴﻜﻮﭘﺘﺮﻫﺎﻳﻲ
120
ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﭘــﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﻫﻠﻴﻜﻮﭘﺘﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺗﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﻧــﻮﻉ ﺗﺎﻧﻜﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻲ ،54ﺗﻲ ،55ﺗﻲ،56
ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﺗﺎ ﺗــﻲ ،72ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺳــﻼﺡﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﺳــﻼﺡ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ،ﻛﻼﺷﻴﻨﻜﻒ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﺎ ،ژ 3-ﺑﻮﺩ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻠﻮﻙﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷــﺎﻩ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﻙ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ
ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﻙ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻕ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺯﻣﻴﻨــﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﺭﻫــﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺗﻮﭘﺨﺎﻧﻪ
ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧــﻞ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﻗﻄﻌﺎﺕ
ﻳﺪﻛﻲ ،ﻣﻬﻤﺎﺕ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷــﻲ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ -ﺍﺯ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻱ
ﺗﺎ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻤﺎﺕ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺒﻚ -ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺳﻲ ،ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻜﻲ ،ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﺭﺍﻡﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺳﻮﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﭼﭗﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻢﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺑﻌﺚ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ
ﻏﺮﺑﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ.
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺳﻘﻒ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧــﺪﻩ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻮﺍ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺣﺰﺑﻲ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﺰﺏ ،ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ ﻫــﻢ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﻢﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﺨﺺ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﺳــﺎﻝ ،1975ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ 1975ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ،
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﺣﻞ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻞ ﺷــﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﻋﺎﻣــﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺨﺼﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﺎﺕ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭﺁﻣــﺪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻣﺘﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ13ﻣﻴﻠﻴــﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ13ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ 8ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺷــﻴﻌﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ 2/5 ،ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ
ﻋﺮﺏ ﺳﻨﻲ 2/5 ،ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﻲ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺑــﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﻮﺩ ﻋﻤــﺪﻩ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﻣﺘﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﭘﻚ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺳــﻬﻢ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ
ﺳﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﻧﻔﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؛ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻳﻚﺳﻮﻡ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﻔﺖ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ،ﻟﺬﺍ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻧﻔﺖ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻧﻔﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚﺳﻮﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺣــﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻴــﻢ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦﺳــﻮ .ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﭘﻴــﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ،ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠــﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻳﺖ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻛﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺖ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺗﺎ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ
ﺭژﻳﻢ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﺎﺗﻮﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺷــﻮﺩ،ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ،ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ،ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ ﻭ ...ﭘﺲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ،
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﻃﺮﻑ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ
ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺱ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﭘﺴــﺖ ﻧﺨﺴﺖﻭﺯﻳﺮﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻭﺯﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺗﺸــﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ،
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺣﺰﺍﺏ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺗﺜﺒﻴﺖﺷﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻻﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﺳﻮﺳﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻔﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﺖ ﺷــﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﻲﺻﺪﺭ ﺳﺮﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺑﻨﻲﺻﺪﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺷــﻜﺎﻑ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﻲ
ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﺭﺋﻴﺲﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭ ﺧﻂ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻛــﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺑﻨﻲﺻﺪﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺛﻨﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻨﺴﺠﻤﻲ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ :ﻛﻼ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺭژﻳﻢ ﺷــﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺪ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ ﻭ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺩﻛﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺳﻪ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ
ﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺳــﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺣﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺷﻮﺭﻭﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺁﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﻡ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ﻇﺮﻑ ﻣﺪﺕ 24ﺗﺎ 48ﺳــﺎﻋﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﺵ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺷــﺎﻩ ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ژﺍﻧﺪﺍﺭﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 100ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻧﺎﻭ ﺟﻨﮕﻲﺷﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻧــﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻋﺮﺑﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻛﻮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺤﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻗﻄﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻋﺮﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﻫــﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﻭﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺴــﻤﺖ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ
ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺜﻼ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺑﺰﺭگﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ؟ ﭘﻨﺎﺭﻙ 10 .ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ 10ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ
ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻨﺪﺭﻋﺒﺎﺱ ،ﺑﻮﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻳﻪ .ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻳﻪ 300ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻑ 16ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﺮ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ،ﺷﻴﺮﺍﺯ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻑ14ﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ
ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻔﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳــﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﺩﻫﻲ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻋــﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴــﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴﺪ ،ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳــﺖ )ﻛﺎﻧﺘﻴﻤﻨﺖ( ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ
ﻛﺎﻧﺘﻴﻤﻨﺖ ﺳــﺪ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺗﺒﺮﻳﺰ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﻙ ﺷــﻮﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺰﻭ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻛﺎﻧﺘﻴﻤﻨﺖ
ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻴﻜﻦ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ
ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﻇﻬﻴﺮﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺷــﻨﻴﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻮ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻘﺮ ﻟﺸﻜﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻣﺤﻞ ﻟﺸﻜﺮ16
ﺯﺭﻫﻲ ﻗﺰﻭﻳﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻪ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺎﺡ ﺷﺮﻗﻲ
ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻔﺘﻢ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ
ﻧﺎﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻧﺎﻭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺒﺮ ﻭ ﭘﻠﻨــﮓ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻧﺎﻭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻗﺪﻳﻤــﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﺎﻭﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ
ﺟﺰﻭ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺣﻔﺎﻇــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭژﻳﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺮﻓــﺪﺍﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻋﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﭼﺮﻳﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻳﻤﻦ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻇﻔﺎﺭ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺘﺶ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 1353ﺑﻪ ﻇﻔﺎﺭ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ
ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﭘﺎﺩﺷــﺎﻫﻲ ﻋﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﭼﺮﻳﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﻮﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻋﻤﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻫﺎ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺷــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﻮﺑﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦﺍﺳﺎﺱﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲﺍﺭﺗﺶﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ،ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺭﺗﺶ
،ﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥﻭﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥﺭﺍﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻐﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﻐﺰ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻐﺰ ﺳﺘﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻐﺰ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ
ﺑﺎ 50ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﺸــﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺴﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻭ ﺳﺮﭘﺎ ﻧﮕﻪﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ 26ﺩﻱﻣﺎﻩ
ﺳﺎﻝ 1357ﺷــﺎﻩ ﭘﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺖ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﺤﺎﺕ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻠﻐﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
121
ﺩﻛﻮﺋﻪﻳﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺑﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻰ
ﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻳﻮﻧﻴﻤﺎگ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ 6/30ﺻﺒﺢ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﻭﺷﻨﺒﻪ 29ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ) 1367ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ
ﺍﻭﺕ (1988ﺑــﻪ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ »ﺧﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﭘﺮﺯ ﺩﻛﻮﺋﻪﻳــﺎﺭ« ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ
ﻭﻗﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﻭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺮﺭﺍﺕ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻩ
ﺷﺪ .1ﺩﺳــﺘﻮﺭ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻗﺒﻼ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ
ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ »ﺩﻛﻮﺋﻪﻳﺎﺭ« ﺻﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣــﻪ ،ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻭ
ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ 1300ﻧﻔﺮﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺪﺍﺭ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺭﺍﻧﻴﺰ
ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎ ـ ﻳﻮﻧﻴﻤﺎگـ
ﻧﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺭﻭﺯ 28ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺩﻭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻳﻮﻧﻴﻤﺎگ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 612ﻣﺼﻮﺏ 17ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ 1367
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻣﺪﺕ 6ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﺮ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ،ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺷﺶ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻤﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﺪ» .ﻳﻮﻧﻴﻤﺎگ«
ﻣﺘﺸــﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ 1300ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ 24ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ :ﺁﺭژﺍﻧﺘﻴﻦ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﻟﻴﺎ ،ﺍﺗﺮﻳﺶ ،ﺑﻨﮕﻼﺩﺵ،
ﻛﺎﻧﺎﺩﺍ ،ﺩﺍﻧﻤﺎﺭﻙ ،ﻓﻨﻼﻧﺪ ،ﻏﻨﺎ ،ﻣﺠﺎﺭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ،ﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻧﺪﻭﻧﺰﻯ ،ﺍﻳﺮﻟﻨﺪ،
ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎ ،ﻛﻨﻴﺎ ،ﻣﺎﻟﺰﻯ ،ﺯﻻﻧﺪﻧﻮ ،ﻧﻴﺠﺮﻳﻪ ،ﻧﺮﻭژ ،ﻟﻬﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺳﻨﮕﺎﻝ،
ﺳﻮﺋﺪ ،ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ،ﻳﻮﮔﺴﻼﻭﻯ ﻭ ﺯﺍﻣﺒﻴﺎ.
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ 350ﻧﻔﺮ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ 615ﻧﻔﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺪﻩ 80ﻧﻔﺮ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ 375 ،ﻧﻔﺮ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﺑﺮﺍﺕ130 ،
ﻧﻔﺮ ﺧﺪﻣﻪ ﻫﻠﻴﻜﻮﭘﺘﺮ ﻭ 30ﻧﻔﺮ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ 350ﻧﻔﺮ
ﻏﻴﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺷﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺳــﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻯ »ﻳﻮﻧﻴﻤﺎگ« ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻫﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﻇﺮ،
ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺍﺭﺷﺪ ،ﺳﺨﻨﮕﻮﻯ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻧﻔﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻐــﺪﺍﺩ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻧﺎﻇﺮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻓﺴــﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﻟﻨﺪﻯ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﻛﻞ
»ﻳﻮﻧﻴﻤﺎگ« ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ژﻧﺮﺍﻝ »ﺍﺳــﻼﻭﻛﻮﻳﻮﻭﻳﭻ« ﺗﺒﻌﻪ ﻳﻮﮔﺴﻼﻭﻯ
122
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻧﻘﺶ »ﺩﻛﻮﺋﻪ ﻳﺎﺭ« ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻰ
ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﻤﻌﺎ ﻫﺸﺖ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ ﻛــﺮﺩ؛ 3ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭﻩ 479ـ 514ـ
522ـ 540ـ 582ـ 588ـ 598ـ .619ﺩﺭﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﭘﻨﺞ ﻋﻀﻮ
ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻰ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻛﺎ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺸﻮﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺸﺮﺩﻩ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﭘﻴﺶﻧﻮﻳﺴﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻭﻯ ﻓﺼﻞ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﺎﺕ
ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺁﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺐ
ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣــﻪ 598ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻴــﻦ ﺩﺭﮔﻴــﺮ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺷــﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ »ﻓﻮﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﺗــﺶ ﺑﺲ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺸﺖ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺑﻜﺸﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ «.ﺷﻮﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﻋــﺮﺍﻕ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ
ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻭ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣــﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻠﻴــﻪ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺕ
ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ،ﻋﺎﺩﻻﻧﻪ ،ﺷــﺮﺍﻓﺘﻤﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ
ﻭ ﺑﺎﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ «.ﺷﻮﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻤﺮﺍﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺻﻠﺢ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﻣﻮﺍﺩ 39ﻭ 40ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ4 .
ﺩﻭﻟــﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫــﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘــﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﺨﺴــﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﺧــﻮﺭﺩﻯ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﻳــﺺ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻰ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﺑــﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻌﻠﻖ ـ ﻧﻪ ﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻗﺒﻮﻝـ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ،ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ،ﻫﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻳﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻛﺸــﺘﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺍﺳﻜﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﺸــﺘﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻠﻴﺞﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﻣﻰﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ 12ﺗﻴــﺮ 1367ﻧــﺎﻭ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ـ ﻭﻳﻨﺴــﻨﺲـ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ
ﻋﻤﺪﻯ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﺎﻓﺮﺑﺮﻯ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺖ 290ﻣﺴــﺎﻓﺮ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ .ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ،ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ 26ﺗﻴﺮ 1367
ﺭﺳﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ »ﺩﻛﻮﺋﻪ ﻳﺎﺭ« ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﺘﺎﺭ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺻﻠﺢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ
598ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﻳﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺍﺳــﺘﺤﻀﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ،ﺁﺗﺶ
ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﺭژﻳﻢ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ 22ﺳﭙﺘﺎﻣﺒﺮ 1980ﺑﺎ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ ﺍﺭﺿﻰ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻚ
ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ
ﺣﺘﻰ ﻏﻴﺮﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻰﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻌﻠﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻗﺘﻞ 290ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻰﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺳﺎﻗﻂ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎﻯ
ﺍﻳﺮﺑﺎﺱ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳــﻴﻠﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﺘﻰﻫﺎﻯ
ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻠﻴﺞ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺭﺯ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺘﻰ ،ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﺎﺑﻌﺎﻟﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ (1987) 598ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺼﻤﻢ ﺷــﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺻﻠﺢ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻨﻄﻘــﻪﺍﻯ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ،ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598
) (1987ﺷــﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ .ﻣــﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ
ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ «.ﺳــﻴﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ،ﺭﺋﻴــﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ
ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ »ﺩﻛﻮﺋﻪ ﻳﺎﺭ« ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻛﻞ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ9 ،
ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺭﺳــﻤﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺒﻨﻰ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،598
ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠــﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ 4ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ 1367ﺗﺎ 26ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝ 9 ،ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ 6ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ
ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣــﻪ 598ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻛﺮﺩ5 .
»ﺩﻛﻮﺋﻪ ﻳﺎﺭ« ﺩﺭ 17ﻣــﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﻭﺯﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻭﻯ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺮﺍﺭ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺑﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻰ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻤﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻣﻔﺎﺩ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ 598ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥﺑﻨﺪﻯ
ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻰ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ
ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺑﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﭙﻴﺪﻩ ﺩﻡ ﺭﻭﺯ
29ﻣﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺁﺗﺶﺑﺲ،
ﺳﻔﻴﺮ ﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ »ﺩﻛﻮﺋﻪ ﻳﺎﺭ« ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩ »ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ «1987ﺑﺮﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 1965ﺑﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢ
ﻭ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻰ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﺷــﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻜﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻋﻄﺎ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩ »ﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ« ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﻧﻘﺶ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻯ
ﺻﻤﻴﻤﺎﻧﻪ »ﺩﻛﻮﺋﻪ ﻳﺎﺭ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺑﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ
ﺑﻪ ﻭﻯ ﺍﻋﻄﺎ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻧﻬﺮﻭ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻫﻨﺪ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺲ ،ﻧﺎﻣﮕﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﺑﺮﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ :ﺍﻭﺗﺎﻧﺖ ،ﻣﺎﺭﺗﻴﻦ ﻟﻮﺗﺮﻛﻴﻨﮓ ،ﻧﻠﺴﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻻ،
ﺍﻳﻨﺪﻳﺮﺍ ﮔﺎﻧﺪﻯ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻻﻑ ﭘﺎﻟﻤﻪ.
»ﺩﻛﻮﺋﻪ ﻳﺎﺭ« ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﺵ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ،ﻃﻰ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻮﺋﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻴــﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ » :ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﻼﻳﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ .ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻛﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺳﭙﺎﺳﮕﺰﺍﺭﻡ6 «.
ﮔــﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺩﻛﻮﺋﻪ ﻳﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻛﻞ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻼﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ.
ﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻨﺪ 6ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿــﻊ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸــﺨﺺ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤﺎﺕ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺾ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ )ﻧﻘﺾ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ،
ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻭﺭ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻴﺖ ﺍﺭﺿﻰ ﻳﻚ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﺨﺎﺻﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ( ﻫﻤﺎﻧﺎ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ 22
ﺳﭙﺘﺎﻣﺒﺮ 1980ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ
ﻣﺨﺎﺻﻤﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﺨﺎﺻﻤﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺗﻌﺮﺿﺎﺕ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻙ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﺿﺎﺗﻰ
ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﺨﺎﺻﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻗﺾ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺯﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ
ﻳﻚ ﻳﺎ ﻫــﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩﻯ ﻫﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻰ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺾ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﺤﺎﺕ
ﺷــﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ،ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺮﺍﻯ
ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ .ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺎﺳﻒ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎ
ﺣﺎﻛﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺷﻮﺍﻫﺪﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺾ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﻇﻒ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﺳﻒ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺷــﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻰ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻋﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻤﻼﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ7 «...
ﭘﺎﻭﺭﻗﻰ:
1ـ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ؛ .1367/5/29
The United nations iran – iraq military observer - 2
.(group Unimag
3ـ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻞ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ،ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺻﻠﺢ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ؛
ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﺛﻘﻔﻰ ﻋﺎﻣﺮﻯ؛ ﺍﻧﺘﺸـﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ
ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ؛ ﺹ 174
4ـ ﻣﻴﺮ ﺳـﻌﻴﺪ ﻗﺎﺿﻰ ،ﻋﻠﻰ؛ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻴﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﻛﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺳـﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻣﻠﻞ
ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳـﻰ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ؛ ﺍﻧﺘﺸـﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ
ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ؛ ﺹ 383
5ـ ﻣﻴﺮﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﻗﺎﺿﻰ؛ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ؛ ﺹ .384
6ـ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ؛ 1367/4/18
7ـ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﻴﻬﺎﻥ؛ 1373/4/28
ﻛﺮﻛﺮﻯﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱﺑﺮﺳﺮﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲﻭﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ
ﭼﺸﻢ ﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﺁﻥﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﻨــﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﻬﻤﺎﻧﻲ .ﺍﻭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ
ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺁﻣﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺫﻟﺖ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺳﺎﻧﻲ .ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻨﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﻦ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ .ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻛﻒ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻴﻢ .ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺗﻠﺦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻠﺦﺗﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ،
ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺮﺳــﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻣﺘﺒﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟ ﭼــﻪ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ؟ ﭼﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ؟
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﭽﻪ ﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺪﺭ ﭘﻰ ﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺷــﺎﻥ ﻏﺒﻄﻪ ﻣﻰ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻣﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺷــﻴﺦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﻳﻮﻡ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ.
ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻟﺶ ﻣﻰ ﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻟﺶ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻰ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺗﺎ ﺍﺑﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻟﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻢ
ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳــﺘﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﻭﺵ ﺍﻛﺒﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻟﻲ ﺩﻭﺁﺗﻴﺸــﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺪﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ
ﺍﻛﺒﺮﭘﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻃــﻮﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻫﻤﺮﺯﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ 48ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﺟﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﺪ
ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
»ﺧﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺁﺑﻴﻪ ،ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺁﺑﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺎ ﺍﺑﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻟﻲ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻢ «.ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻼﺕ ،ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯﺍﻥ
124
ﻣﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ 12ﺳﺎﻟﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﺠﺮﻭﺡ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﺳﺖ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻃــﺮﺍﺕ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ،ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻳــﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻟﻲ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺴــﻲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻳﻢ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ،ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﻋﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺑﺒﺎﺯﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ،ﺩﻋﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ
ﺑﺒﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻟﺞ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﺶ ﮔﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ؛ ﺷﺶ ﺗﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻟﺞ
ﻣﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﻭﺭﺯﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﺷــﻴﺮﻭﺩﻱ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ
ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﺶ ﺁﻥﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺻﺒﺢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ
ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛ »ﺍﺯ ﺻﺒﺢ ﺯﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﮕﺎﻩ
ﺷــﻴﺮﻭﺩﻱ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺫﻭﻕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ .ﻭﻟﻲ
ﺟﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊﻫﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﻳﻮﻡ
ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﻢ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﺳﻴﮕﺎﺭ ﺑﻜﺸﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ«.
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍﺳﭙﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥﻧﮋﺍﺩﻫﺎ
ﺳﭙﺮﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﺭﺯﻭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻓﺸــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺫﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﺎﻙ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ 250ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻋﺮﺍﻗﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺫﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻙ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺷــﻐﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻼﺷﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺟﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﻳﻮﻡ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻮﻳﻖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﭘﺮﺳﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻭ
ﺟﻮﺍﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﻋﻠﻴﺮﺿﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻟﻲ ﺩﻭﺁﺗﻴﺸﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ
ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺗﻴﻤﺶ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﺿﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦﻫﻤﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺷﮕﻔﺖﺯﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
»ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺣﺠﺐ ﻭ ﺣﻴﺎ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺨﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻛﻢ ﺗﻼﺵ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻟﺒﺎﺱﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺧﺮﻳﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻠﻲ ﭘﺮﻭﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻭ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﻄﻮﺭﻩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﺣﻤﺖ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ«.
ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻮﺗﺒــﺎﻝ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻼﻝ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﭘﺎﻳــﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻤــﺎﻡ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻣــﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺒﻨﺪﻱ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﭼﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻧﻴﻤﻜﺖ ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ«.
ﻧﻤﻲﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺟﻴﺐ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﻤﺎﻥ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥﻧــﮋﺍﺩ ﺣﺮﻑﻫــﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛
»ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻦ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﻤﺎﻥ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ
ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻳﺎ ﭘﺮﺳــﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻞ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺗﻴﻢ .ﺍﻻﻥ
ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ«.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺼﺪﻭﻣﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻥﻭﺍﺭﻳﻮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻩ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ
ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺳــﺎﻳﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ«.
ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺷــﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ،
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻭ
ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻠﺶ
ﻣﺮﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺭﺍﻣﺶ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻛﺎﺳــﺘﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﻭﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﻪ
ﺁﻧــﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺗﻴــﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ
ﺗﻴﺰﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﻴﺦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺶ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ
ﺗﻴﻢﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﻟﺬﺕﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺧﺘﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ
ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻦ ،ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﻛﺸﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺴﻲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ
ﺗﻴﻢﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺷــﻴﺦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ،
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ
ﻓﺮﻳﺪﻭﻥﻧــﮋﺍﺩ
ﻛﺸﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ
ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻛﺸﺘﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺎﺯﻡ
ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﺎﺩﻳﻮﻡ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ
ﺟﺎﻟﺒﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻠﻮ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻴــﻢ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺑﺶ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺳﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻴﺰﺑﻴﻨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺗﻴﻢ
ﺭﺍﺿﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ »ﻣﻌﺘﻘــﺪﻡ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫــﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻓﻌﻠــﻲ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ
ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺸﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ
ﻣﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴــﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻓﻬﻤﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺷــﻴﺦﻣﺤﻤﺪ ،ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯ
ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﺭ ﭼﺸﻤﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺷــﻴﺦﻣﺤﻤﺪ 41ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺷــﻨﻮﻧﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺬﺍﺑﻲ ﺳــﺨﺖ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﭼــﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﭼﺸﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﻓﺮﻭﻏﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﻫﺮﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺳﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﭼﺸــﻢﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻟﺶ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﻨﺸــﻴﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻟﻴﺰ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻢ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﻨﺠﻢ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺣﺪﺱ ﺑﺰﻧﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﺾ
ﻣﺮﺑﻲ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ«.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻴﺰﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷــﻴﺦ ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻭ
ﻋﺎﺷــﻖ ﻛﺸﺘﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻧﺎﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺸﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻋﻀﻮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻲ ﻛﺸﺘﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺎﺯﻡ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺤﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺷﻴﺦﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻮﺍﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺴﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻑ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺑﺶ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﮓ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﻓﺼﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ.ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻴﻤﺶ ﺭﺍﺿﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ؛ »ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ ،ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻴﻢ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺷــﻴﺦﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺴﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﺗﻌﺼﺒﺶ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺗﻌﺼﺒﻢ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻻ
ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻡ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺴــﻲﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻛﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻟﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺳﺮﺩﺳــﺘﻪ ﻛﺮﻱﺧﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺧﻨــﺪﺩ ،ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳــﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ؛
»ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻟﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ .ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺷﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﺷﺶ ﺗﺎ ﮔﻞ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺑﺪ ﺷﺶ ﺗﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻴﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻮﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻼﻥ«...
ﺷﻴﺦﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ
ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﺱ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺁﻥﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻻﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﻋﺒﺎﺱ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺻﺒﺢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻟﻘﻤﻪﺍﻱ
ﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭﻟــﻲ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺩﺍﺭﻧــﺪ .ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻫﻦﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻝ
ﻧﻤﻲﺳﻮﺯﺍﻧﻨﺪ«.
ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﮔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺷــﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺷﻴﺦﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻋﻼﺝ ﺩﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؛ »ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻼﺝ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺎﺕ
ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴــﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻣﮕﺮ ﻧﻪ ﭘﺎﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺍﻩﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ«.
ﺷــﻴﺦﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻟﺪﻭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺸﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺸﺘﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣــﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻮﻛﻮﻝ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ
ﻛﺸﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻓﻮﺗﺒــﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ،ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻘﺎﺗﺶ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲﺗﺮﻱ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ،
ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺳــﺘﻲﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﻟﺤﻦ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷﺪﻩ .ﺧﺐ
ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ«.
125
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺩﻫﻠﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻮﺍﺯ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ
ﻋﻜﺲﻫﺎ:ﺍﻣﻴﺮ ﻃﻼﻳﻲ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻧﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻴﻦ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺸﻴﻴﻊ ﭘﻴﻜﺮ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﺭﻣﻀﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻳﻚﺳﺎﻝ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻴﻦ
ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﺖ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﻫﻠﺮﺍﻥ
126
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺑﻲ
ﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﺱ،ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ،ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﮔﻲ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺟﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.ﺷﺶ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 200ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺮ ﻣﺮﺑﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻙ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺸﺎﻭﺭﺯﻱ ،ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻜﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﺍﻥ
ﻋﻤﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﺱ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﺳﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻙ ﻣﻴﻬﻦ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲ ﺭﺳﺪ.ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻏﻴﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺻﻠﺢ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻲ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺳﺎﺑﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﻕ ﺁﺑﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﺭﺛﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻛﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻴﻦﻳﺎﺑﻲ
ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻴﻦﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻴﻦﻳﺎﺏ
ﭘﺎﻙﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﺎﻧﻚ ﻣﻴﻦﻛﻮﺏ
ﺧﻨﺜﻲﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ
ﺍﻧﻬﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﻣﻴﻦﻫﺎ
ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻣﻴﻦﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭ
127
ژﺍﻧﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ
ﻛﻠﻮﺯﺁپ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺟﻠﻴﻠﻲ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ،ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺑﺪﻳﻞ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻛــﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﭼﻪ ﻣﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ
ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ )ﻋﺮﺍﻕ( ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺳــﻮﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﻤﻴﻦ
ﺳﺎﻟﮕﺮﺩ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺠﺶ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫــﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ« ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ
ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﭘﻲﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻮﺷﻴﺪﻧﺪ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺁﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺘﻀﻴﺎﺕ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﺴــﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ .ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﺩﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 59ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﻣﺴــﺘﻨﺪ »ﻓﺘﺢ ﺧﻮﻥ« ﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ »ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ« )ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﺳــﻴﺪﻣﺮﺗﻀﻲ ﺁﻭﻳﻨﻲ( ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻟﻴــﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﺘﺢ
ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻃﺮﺡ »ﭼﻬﻞ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ« ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺮﺳﻴﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ .ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺎﻟﺒﻲ ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﺟﻮﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺸــﺎﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺫﻫﻨﻴﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻧﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺧﺎﺹ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩ ،ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ؛ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻋﻄﺶ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎﻱ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ
ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ» .ﻋﻘﺎﺏﻫﺎ«» ،ﺑﺮﺯﺧﻲﻫﺎ«» ،ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺷﺘﮕﺎﻩ«،
»ﭘﻼﻙ«» ،ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﻬﻨﻤﻲ« ﻭ »ﻋﺒــﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻴﻦ« ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﮕــﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﺟﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﺗﻮﺳــﻂ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺑﺎﻻﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺳــﺎﻛﻨﺎﻥ
ﺷــﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻴﻨﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺷــﺖ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑــﺮ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﺩﻳــﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺗﻼﺵﻫــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻴﻨﻲ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﻣﻼﻗﻠﻲﭘﻮﺭ
)ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺐ( ،ﺭﺳــﻮﻝ ﺻﺪﺭﻋﺎﻣﻠﻲ )ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ( ،ﺣﺴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺨﺶ
)ﺩﻳﺎﺭ ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻥ( ﻭ ﺣﺠﺖﺍﷲ ﺳﻴﻔﻲ )ﻛﻴﻠﻮﻣﺘﺮ ﭘﻨﺞ( ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻢﺗﺠﺮﺑﮕﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﺎﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ
128
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺗﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺒــﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻗﺪﻡﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﮕﺸﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ .ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ
ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺛﺒﺖ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﭼــﻮﻥ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ،ﻛﻤــﺎﻝ ﺗﺒﺮﻳﺰﻱ ،ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺩﺭﻭﻳﺶ ،ﻣﺠﺘﺒﻲ ﺭﺍﻋﻲ ،ﻋﺰﻳﺰﺍﷲ ﺣﻤﻴﺪﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻤﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﺭﺟﻪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺻﺪﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺯ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ،
»ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺑﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﺵ »ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮ« ﺭﺍ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺ ،ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪ
)ﻣﺠﺘﺒﻲ ﺭﺍﻋﻲ( ،ﻋﺒﻮﺭ )ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺗﺒﺮﻳﺰﻱ( ،ﺭﻭﺯﻧﻪ )ﺟﻤﺎﻝ ﺷﻮﺭﺟﻪ(،
ﭼﺸﻢ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ )ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﺳﻤﻲﺟﺎﻣﻲ( ﻭ ﻫﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺗﺶ )ﻋﺰﻳﺰﺍﷲ
ﺣﻤﻴﺪﻧﮋﺍﺩ( ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ
ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺯﻣﻨــﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺧﻠﻮﺹ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ »ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭ« ﻭ »ﺷــﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﻃﻠﺒﻲ« ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺳﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﻼ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﻴﻨﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺗﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺩﻫــﻪ 70ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺑﻠﻮﻍ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ،ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺗﺠــﺎﺭﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻱ
ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭼــﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﮕﺎ
)ﺳــﻴﻒﺍﷲ ﺩﺍﺩ( ،ﺍﻓﻖ )ﺭﺳــﻮﻝ ﻣﻼﻗﻠﻲﭘﻮﺭ( ،ﮔﺬﺭﮔﺎﻩ )ﺷــﻬﺮﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ( ﻭ ﭘــﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺵ )ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﻳﺶ( ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺩﻫــﻪ 70ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺑﺤﺚﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻄﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺣــﻮﺯﻩ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﺍﺵ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ» .ﻋﺮﻭﺳــﻲ ﺧﻮﺑﺎﻥ«
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﺤﺴﻦ ﻣﺨﻤﻠﺒﺎﻑ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯ ﻣﻮﺟﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻟﺤﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺷﺪ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﻋﻤﻖ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲ
ﻭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺘﺶ ﻧﻔﺲﮔﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻴﺨﻜﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ »ﺑﺎﺷــﻮ ﻏﺮﻳﺒﻪ
ﻛﻮﭼﻚ« ﺑﻬﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﻴﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﻗﻮﻋﺶ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﺎﻥ
ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺿﺪﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻴﺖﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗــﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﻧﮓ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ؛ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﺪﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻨﺎﻱ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻲ
ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥﺯﺩﮔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺭﻭﺍﺝ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺰﺩ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ
ﺟﺪﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﭘﺮﺳــﺘﺎﺭ ﺷﺐ
)ﻣﺤﻤﺪﻋﻠﻲ ﻧﺠﻔﻲ ( ﻭ ﺍﻭﻳﻨﺎﺭ )ﺷﻬﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺪﻱ( ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ »ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻠﺦ ﻋﺸﻖ« ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ
ﺗﺒﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻓﺠﺮ ﻧﺮﻓﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺍﺑﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﺍﻧﺪﻙ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﺨﺮﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﻫﻮﻟﻨﺎﻙ ﺑﺮ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻲ »ﺍﺯﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ«
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﻠﻮﺩﺭﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﻳﺶ
ﺑﺎ »ﻛﻴﻤﻴﺎ« ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓــﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺟﺪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻛــﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﺶ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﻭ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺟﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﻮﻝ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ .ﻭﺭﻭﺩ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻛﻢﺍﺳــﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﭙﻲﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ
ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻤﺶ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻇﺮﺍﻓﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﺮﻁ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻧﺰﻭﻟﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﺶ
ﻫﻢ ﻧﺰﺩ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ »ﺣﺎﺟﻲ -ﺳﻴﺪﻱ«
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﺰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ 60ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺸــﺎﺑﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﻧﻤﺎﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﭼﻔﻴﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻼﻙ ﻭ ﻛﺒﻮﺗﺮ
ﻭ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻜﺴــﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻢ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺍﺳﻂ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ
ﻣﻬﻢ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭﺁﻣﺪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ
ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻃﻨﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ .ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ »ﺑﻮﻱ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻫﻦ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ« ،ﺩﺭ
»ﺑﺮﺝ ﻣﻴﻨﻮ« ﺗﻠﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻧﻴﻮﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺟﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﺛﺮ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ
ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﻣﺤﺴــﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺭﺳــﻮﻝ ﻣﻼﻗﻠﻲﭘﻮﺭ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﺵ »ﺳــﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺰﺍﺑﻪ« ﻭ
»ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﮕﺎﻥ« ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺣﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ
ﺩﻭﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﻲﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺎﺋﺒﺶ
ﺑﻲﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳــﻤﻲ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ
ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ »ﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ« ﻛﻤﺎﻝ
ﺗﺒﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻃﻨﺰ ﻭ ﺧﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ
ﺭﻳﺎﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻠﻴﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺸــﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ »ﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ« ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ
ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫــﺎ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﻨﺰ
ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻋﻤﻖ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ
ﻭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ ﺗﺒﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﻛﻤﺪﻱ – ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﻤــﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﺑــﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ
ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻲ – ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ »ﺑﻮﻱ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻫﻦ
ﻳﻮﺳﻒ« ﺩﺭ »ﺑﺮﺝ ﻣﻴﻨﻮ« ﺗﻠﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻧﻴﻮﻱ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺟﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﺍﺛﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻛﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻛــﻪ ﺗﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺧﺮﺩﺍﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺘﺮﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ
ﺑﺎ ﻛﻢﺷــﺪﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻪﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺭﻓﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻲ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﻢﺷﺪﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻫﻪ 70ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫــﻢ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪ .ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ
»ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸــﻪﺍﻱ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺒﻮﻫﻲ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺷــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳــﺪﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﺵ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻧﺶ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﺴﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭ ﻧﺴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻌﺪﻱﺍﺵ ﻫﻢ ﭘﻲ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ »ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ« ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺳﺨﺖ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺧﻼﻓﺶ ﻋﻤــﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ ﺩﻫــﻪ 70ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ
ﺩﺭﻭﻳﺶ »ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﻣﻬﺮ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺶ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﺛﺮﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺍﻳــﻞ ﺩﻫﻪ 80ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸــﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺩﻭﺋﻞ«
ﺍﺣﻤﺪﺭﺿﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﻳﺶ ﻭ »ﻣﺰﺭﻋﻪ ﭘﺪﺭﻱ« ﺭﺳــﻮﻝ ﻣﻼﻗﻠﻲﭘﻮﺭ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻﻛــﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺮژﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻘﻲ
ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﺋﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺒﻠﻴــﻎ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺗﺎﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺟﻠﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﺘﻮﺳــﻂ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔــﺬﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﺭﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣــﺪﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻪ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻓﺶ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ،ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﻮﻟــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺳــﺒﺐ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪﺭﻏﻢ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻭ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫــﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺭﺥ ﻧﺪﻫﺪ.
ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ »ﺭﻭﺯ ﺳﻮﻡ«» ،ﺍﺗﻮﺑﻮﺱ
ﺷﺐ«» ،ﭘﺎﺩﺍﺵ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ« ﻭ »ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ« ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﭘﺎﺩﺍﺵ
ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻮﺑﻮﺱ ﺷﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺗﻮﺑﻮﺱ ﺷﺐ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻋﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺮﻗــﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ.
»ﺭﻭﺯ ﺳــﻮﻡ« ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐﭘﺴــﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻰ ﻫﺎﻯ
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻧﻬﻢ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺳــﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻠﺐ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﻼﻥ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺟﻲ – ﺳﻴﺪﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﻮﺧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.ﺩﺭ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻣﻴﻦ ﺩﻫﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﺎﻣﻄﻠﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ
ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻣﺴﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺎﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻭﻗﺎﻳــﻊ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺒــﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ،
ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ،ﻣﺼﺎﺋﺐ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻧﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻛﻤﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﺥﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻛﻼﻥﺗﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﻥ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ.
129
ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺜﻠﺚ
ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻫﺎ ﺁﺭﺯﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷﺪ
ﻣﺤﻤﺪ ﻳﻮﺳﻒ ﺻﻤﺪﻱ -ﺁﺫﺭ ﻛﻤﺎﻟﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ« ﺭﺍ ﺍ ﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻴﻢ .ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ
»ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ ﻓﺤﺸـﺎ« ﻭ »ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ؟ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ؟« ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴـﺎﺯﺩ ،ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ
ﺍﻧﺘﺸـﺎﺭ »ﺻﺒﺢ« ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻧﺼﻴﺮﻱ ،ﭼﻨﺪ ﺷـﻤﺎﺭﻩ »ﺻﺒﺢ ﺩﻭﻛﻮﻫﻪ« ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ »ﺟﺒﻬﻪ« ﻭ »ﺷﻠﻤﭽﻪ« ﺭﺍ ﭼﺎپ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻲ
ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﺗﻴﺮﺍژﻱ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﺳـﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶﺗﺮ ،ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ »ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ« ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻎ ﻣﻲﺷـﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ »ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ« ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴـﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ
130
ﻣﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺗﻮﺳـﻌﻪ« ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺮﻳﺒﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
»ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ« ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺯﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ »ﺣﺎﺝ ﻛﺎﻇﻢ« ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ،ﺳﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﺮﺥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻧﺤﻮﻩ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺮﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ »ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﮓ« ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ ،ﺑﻴﺸـﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺸـﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺴـﺎﺏ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ »ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ« ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻲ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ؟
ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱ 3ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﻢ.
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﻭﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻳﺪ؟
ﻳﻜﻲ ،ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺸــﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻡ.
ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺘﻦﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻢ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻡ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺘﻦﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺏ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﺏ ﺩﺭﺁﻳﺪ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ.
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﻴﺪ؟
ﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﻢ .ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻨﻢ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ
ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐﻫــﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ!
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ 60-70ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ
ﻧﻔﺮ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺧﺎﺹ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴــﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﻠﺪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ.
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻳﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺳــﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲﺗﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ 1/5ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻊﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺩﺭﺳــﺘﻲ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺭﻭﻳﻜـﺮﺩ ﻃﻨﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲﺗﺎﻥ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻧﻪ ،ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺯﺑــﺎﻥ ﻃﻨﺰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫــﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﻫﺮ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻡ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﻢ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﭘﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﻢ.
ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱ 2ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴـﺖ 4-5ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻫﺸﺖ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳـﺪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜـﻲ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻥ
ﺑﻲﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﻴﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻌﻤﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﻱ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺷﻨﻮﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﻄﻒ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺣﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺨﺘﻪﺗﺮ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﺯﺩﮔﻲ ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ
ﻛﻨﻢ؛ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﺯﺩﮔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ،ﺷﻌﺮ ،ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺗﺴﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
»ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﺯﺩﮔﻲ« ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭼﻪ؟
ﺍﺩﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻭ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﻤﻲﻓﻬﻤﻨﺪ .ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﻔﺮﻋﻦ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺸــﺎﻥ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺗﻔﺮﻋﻦ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻧﻪ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺸــﺎﻥ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻳﻚ ﺁﻓﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻌﺮ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺷﻌﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﻭ ﻣﻮﻟﻮﻱ ﺯﻣﺰﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﻋﻤﻖ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻌﺮﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺷﻌﺮ ﺣﺎﻓﻆ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﺎﻋﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻠﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻭ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ
ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ.
ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ﺳﺒﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻧﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﺑﻮﻡ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﭘﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺛﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺒﻚ
ﺗﺎﺑﻠﻮﻫﺎ ﺳــﺮﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ .ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛــﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻏﺎﻟﺒــﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻟﺬﺗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﻧﻤﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎﺑﻠﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﻜﺎﺳﻮ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﺩ ﭘﺎﻱ
ﭘﻴﻜﺎﺳﻮ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺩﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺒﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
ﻭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻗﺼﻪﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻣﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻗﺼﻪﮔﻮ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳــﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻓﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺼﻮﺭ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻗﺼﻪﮔﻮ ﻭ ﺳﺒﻚ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﻲ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺒﻚ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻟﺒﺎ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﺯﺩﮔﻲ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺒﻚ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ
ﻏﺮﺏ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺩﻭﺭ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻗﺼﻪﮔﻮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﻲ .ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻫﺮ ﻗﺪﺭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻠﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮ
ﻭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻟﻤﺲﺗﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻃــﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳــﺶ ﺑﮕﻨﺠﺎﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﻞ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻗﻮﻱﺗﺮﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻲﺳـﺎﺯﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻡ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻢ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.ﺩﻭﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻢ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ،ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺣﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﺎﺯﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺗﻤﺜﻴﻞ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻈﻴﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺜﻨﻮﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺼﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻲ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫــﻢ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻏﻴــﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺑﺰﻧﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻟﻤﺲ
ﻭ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻮﺧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱ 2ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷــﻮﺧﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻟﺤﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻌﻤﺪﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺷﻮﺧﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺣﻮﺍﺳﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮگﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺴــﻠﻲ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﺎﻛﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺪ .ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺒﻚ
ﺍﺩﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻭ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ
ﺣﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﻓﻬﻤﻨﺪ .ﻧﻮﻋﻲ
ﺗﻔﺮﻋﻦ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻃﻮﺭﻱ
ﺣﺮﻑ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﻨﺪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠـﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱ 2ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻢ .ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻥ
ﻣﺮﺯ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺨﺶ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱ
2ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫــﺎﻱ 1ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨــﺪ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺷﻜﺴــﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﮔﺮ CDﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱ 1ﻫﻢ ﻗﺎﭼﺎﻕ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻗﻢ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ
ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻦ 10-20ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻳــﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺭﺥ ﺩﻫــﺪ؛ ﺍﻟﺤﻤﺪﺍﷲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔــﺎﻕ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﻧﻤﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ 20ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺷﺪ؟
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﻴﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺣﺮﻓــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ» .ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ .ﻛﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﻳﺪ .ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺯ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ.
ﺟﻨــﮓ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﻘﺮ ﻭ ﻏﻨﺎ ،ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﻖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﺷــﺪﻧﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ «.ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻳﻤــﺎﻥ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺁﻳﻪ
»ﻭﺍﻋﺪﻭﺍﻟﻬﻢ ﻣﺎﺍﺳﺘﻄﻌﺘﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻮﻩ« ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕــﻲ ﻳﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻧﺪﻭﺧﺘﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ
20ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺧﻴﻠﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘــﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻳﻢ ﻧﺸﺮﻳﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺄﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺍﻟﻤﻮﻣﻨﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ)ﻉ( ﻣﺮﺩ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺳﻌﻲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﻭﺧﺘﻦ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺼﻴﺮﺕ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺁﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ
ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ .ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻲ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻡ ،ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ،
ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ،ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﻋﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺸـﻜﻠﻲ ﺩﻳﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺗـﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ؟
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺮﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﮔﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻡ .ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﭘﺮ ﻛﻨﻢ.
ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ژﺍﻧﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺭﻓﺘﻨـﺪ .ﭼﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺣﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳـﺪ ﺑﺎﻳـﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﻮﻳﺪ؟
ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺳﺨﺖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺲ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻫﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟــﻪ ﺷــﺪﻡ .ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﻋﺼﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻱ ﻛﺞﺳﻠﻴﻘﮕﻲﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺁﺳــﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻫﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻳﻚ
ﺳــﺎﻝ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ
ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺎﻝ 85ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﺩﻋﻮﺍﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱ 1ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﻛﺴﻲ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺸﻲ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
131
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺗﺒﻌـﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺷـﺖ .ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻫـﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺟﺎﻧﺸـﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺷـﺪ .ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺑــﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌــﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺑﺨﺸــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺳﭙﺎﺳــﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻓــﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻤﺎﺳــﻪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﺳﭙﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻳﺄﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺟﺴﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻦ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻴﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﻋﺠﻴﺒﻲ ﻣﺒﺘﻼ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻫــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺑــﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ
ﺑﻌﻀــﻲ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻛــﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻧﻬــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺮﻩ
ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺭ ﺷﺄﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﻭﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﺬﻓﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﺳﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻜﺲﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺧﺐ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ؟
ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻋﻤﻞ
ﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻣﻼﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﻘﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻬﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﻣﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺻﺮﻑ ﺩﺭﺱ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺭﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺳــﻪ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻢ .ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻭﻝ 16ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻡ.
ﺧﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ 16ﺗﺎ 19ﺳـﺎﻟﮕﻲ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺷـﺮﺍﻑ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺸـﻮﺩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ
ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ؟
ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻟﻄﻒ ﺧﺪﺍﺳﺖ،
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﺒﺨﺸﻴﺪ ،ﺣﺮﻓﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟
132
ﻧﻪ .ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻡ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﻋﻄﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﻫﺒﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻧﻮﺭ ﺭﺣﻤﺖ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺗﺎﺑﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷــﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻛﻢﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺭ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴــﺖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻢﺳــﻦ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬــﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ،
ﻭﺻﻴﺖﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻲ ﻋﺎﺭﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻃﻲ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ.
ﺩﻳﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻄﻒ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺼﻪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻌﻞ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪ .ﺟﻨﮓ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻌﻤﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﺴــﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻭ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﺳــﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻗﻮﻱﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻳﺎ ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗﺮ.
ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ،
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﻬﺎﺩ ﺍﻛﺒﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ
ﺳﺨﺖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺳــﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺯﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ
ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺴـﻨﺪﻳﺪ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﻋﻤﻮﻣــﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻢ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴــﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛــﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳــﻚ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻡ.
ﺍﻻﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫــﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﺷــﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺴــﻨﺪﻳﺪﻡ ،ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺕﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﻢ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺒﻠﻎ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺿﺪﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؛ ﻛﻼﻩ
ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻓﻬﻢ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ
ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﮔﺸﺎﺩﻱ ﺳﺮ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳـﺎﻝ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺑﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ؟
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺷــﻌﻮﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕــﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ! ﻳﻌﻨــﻲ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕــﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ،
ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻓﻬﻢ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪ ﻣﺸــﺘﺮﻙ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ
ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺿﺪﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻬﻤﻲ
ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻣﺪﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻓــﻼﻥ ﺗﺨﺼﺺ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ،
ﭘﺲ ﻣﺸــﺎﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻡ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳـﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ؟
ﻧﻪ ،ﺍﺻﻼ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﺻﻮﻻ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻱ؟
ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳــﻢ .ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﺘﺼــﺎﺹ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ
ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻳﺪ ،ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺶﻫﺎﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﺮ ﻧﻘﺸﻲ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﺘﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺗﻦ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ.
ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻮﺷﻤﻨﺪﺗﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﺘﻲﻫﺎ،
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺣﺴﻦﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ 100ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﺣﻴﺎ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ،
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﺕﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ،ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺣﻴﺎ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻢ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ! ﺑﺎ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﻲ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻢ.
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﺭ »ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱ «2ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﻫﺎ ﺗﺎ ﮔﻠﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻙ
ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻤـﻮﻻ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ
ﻃﻔﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦﻛﺎﺭ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺸﺶ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﻢ ...ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻧﺸــﻮﻡ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺳﻜﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺨﺶﻫــﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﺸــﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺗﻠﺦ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ.
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺳــﺎﻛﺖ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺣﺮﻓﻲ ﻧﺰﺩ.
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱ 1ﺭﻳﺴـﻚ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺩﺍﺷـﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻧﺰﻧﻢ .ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺫﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻢﻛﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ
ﮔﻠﻪ ﻛﻨﻢ.
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ -ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ -ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﺴـﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺷـﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳـﻮﻱ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ
ﻋﻮﺽ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﮔﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ،
ﻃﻠﺒﻜﺎﺭﺗﺮﻧﺪ! ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺍﻧﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﻍ ﻫﻤﺴــﺎﻳﻪ ﻏﺎﺯ ﺍﺳــﺖ! ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻦ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺍﭘﻮﺯﻳﺴﻴﻮﻥﭘﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺰﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ،
ﺩﻓﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ 30ﺳـﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴـﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟
ﺑﻌﻀــﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕــﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸــﺨﻴﺺ
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻠﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑــﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳــﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﺯﺩﮔﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ،
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻛﻢﻛﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼ
ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻈﺮﺷــﺎﻥ ﺗﻦ ﻧﺪﻫﻴــﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻱ ﺟﺸــﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻭ
ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻫﺎ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳــﻲ ﺳﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ
ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﺍﻥ،
ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﺳﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺳــﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻭﻝ ﻣﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﭼﺮﺍ؟ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻃــﺐ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓــﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻴﻢ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻬــﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺯﻣﻨــﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻠــﻪ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﻢ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ .ﺁﺩﻡ ﺗﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ،ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻠﺖ ﮔﺰﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ
ﭘﺮﻫﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻃﺮﺡ
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻟﻄﻒ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﺣﺎﻟﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻢ
ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺰﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ
ﺣﺎﻻ ﻛﻢ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﻡ.
ﻭﺍﻛﻨـﺶ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﻧـﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻻﺯﻣﻪ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﺳﺨﺘﻲﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻡ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ.
ﭼﻪ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱ 3ﺭﺍ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻴﺪ؟
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ،ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻟﻲ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﻱ 1ﻭ 2ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﻮﻡ
ﻫﺴﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻗﺼــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻱ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ،ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫﺴــﺖ؛
ﻳﺎ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻼﺕ ﺁﻛﺎﺩﻣﻴﻚ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺒﻚﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳــﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻏﺮﻳــﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺑﺮﺳــﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺒﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺪﻫﺪ.
ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺗﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﺳـﺖ ،ﺑـﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﭘﺎﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻧﺸﻴﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻃــﺐ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻧــﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﺑﻌﻀــﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ
ﻧﻜﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻟﺒﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻲﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ 8ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ؟
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺮﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻣﺸــﻬﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ،ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺭﺟﺎﺋﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ .ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﺪ ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺘــﻲ ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭘﺰ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨــﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻓﺮﻕ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ
20ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ 20ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻔﻨﮕﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻓﻘﻂ 1/5ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻣﺸــﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺻﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻨﻜﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﻻﻱﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺯﺣﻤﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ 100ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﻔﺮﻱ
ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻴﻬﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻠﻲ
ﺟﻠﻮﻩ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ،
ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻙ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﻭ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺑﺠﻨﮕﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ
ﮔﻠﭽﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﻧﻮﻉ ﻭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ،ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ
ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﻲﺯﺩ.
ﺳﻴﺮﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﺭﺟﺎﺋﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﺮﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
133
ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ.
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ،ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺯﻳﺴــﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﺮﮔﺸــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻧﻪ
ﻋﻠﺖﻫﺎ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﻈﻬﺮ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺝ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻼﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺝ ﺳــﻔﻴﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻓﺮﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﻛﺎﺥﻫﺎﺭﻭﻱﻛﻮﺥﻫﺎﺳﺖ.ﻳﺎﻧﻮﻉﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﻣﺮﺩﻡﻛﻪﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻗﻨﺎﻋﺖﻣﺤﻮﺭﺑﻪ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﻣﺼﺮﻑﻣﺤﻮﺭﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞﺷﺪ.ﺍﻳﻦﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪﺩﺭﻫﻤﻪﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮕﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﺠﺴــﻤﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻳﺎﺩﺑﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﺍﺯﺟﻨﮓﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ،ﺩﻳﺪﻳﺎﺩﺑﻮﺩﻫﺎﺭﺍﺟﻤﻊﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ
ﻋﻜﺲﻫﺎﻱﺍﻳﻦﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﺭﺍﺍﺯﺩﺭﻭﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭﺷﻬﺮﺟﻤﻊﻛﻨﻴﻢﻛﻪﺑﺎﻋﺚﺗﺼﺎﺩﻑ
ﻧﺸﻮﺩ.ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺷﻬﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯﻛﻮﭼﻪﻫﺎ ﭘﺎﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦﺍﺳﻢﻫﺎﺩﺭﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﮔﻢﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.ﺍﻳﻦﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱﺑﺎﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻮﻳﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻋﻮﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪﺣﺘﻲﺑﺮﺍﻱﺑﻘﺎﻱﻧﺎﻡﻫﻤﺮﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲﻛﻪﻛﻨﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥﭘﺮﭘﺮﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺠﻨﮕﻨﺪ
ﭼﻪﺭﺳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ.
ﺍﻭﻟﻴــﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻝ ﺑــﻮﺩ .ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻝ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠﺖﻫﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺷـﻜﺎﻝ ﺑـﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻢ ﺳـﻦ ﻭ ﺳـﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﺳﻨﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺳــﻮﺍﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﭼﻪ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻛﻼﻫﻲ ﺳﺮﺷــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﻣﺴﻨﺪ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﺸﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗــﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺖ ﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺗﺨﺼﺺﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫــﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻬﻤﻴﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺸــﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻡﺩﺳﺘﻲ
ﺑﺮﻃﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺩﻫﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﺑﻔﺮﺳﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺯﻳــﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺣــﺮﻑ ﺑﺰﻧﻢ ،ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺘــﻲ ﻋــﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺒﻬــﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻳﺎﺩﻡ ﻫﺴــﺖ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺨﺶ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﺽ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻴﻢ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﺪﺭﻭ
ﻭ ﺿﺪﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻫﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﺍﻫﻪ ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ
ﻏﻔﻠﺖ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺨﺒﮕﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ 10
ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﺮﺗﺮ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺑﺎﻡ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻫﺒﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ،ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﻣﻄــﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺗﻔــﺎﻕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺧــﻮﺍﺹ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻭ
ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﭘﺨﺶﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻚ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ
134
ﻟﻘﻤﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺗﺠﻤﻞﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺷــﺮﺍﻓﻲﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺁﻗﺎﺯﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻝﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻨﮓ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺧﺎﺷﮕﺮ ﻭ ﻃﻠﺒﻜﺎﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ،ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻳﻒ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﻘﻤﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ .ﺳﻜﻮﺕ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﺹ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻚﮔﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎ ﭘﺸﺘﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﺗﻴﺮﺍژ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ،
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺗﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺣـﺮﻑ ﺯﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ،
ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﻚ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻙ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺳﺮﻭ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ 30ﺳﺎﻝ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ؟
ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺑﻴﺖ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﻤﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺨﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻱ
ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ ﻻﺋﻴﻚ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ .ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻬﻤﻴﻪ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻭ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻨﺮ ،ﺳﻮﺭﻩ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ ﻋﺎﻓﻴﺖﻃﻠﺐ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵﻫﺎ
ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻳﻨﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ
ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻗﺪﺭ ﻓﻀﺎ ﻣﺴﻤﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﭽﻪ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺿﺪ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻳــﺎ ﻻﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺿﺪﺩﻳــﻦ ﻭ ﻻﺋﻴــﻚ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﭘﻮﻝ ﺑﭽﻪ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺑﻴﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺿﺪﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﮔﺮﻭﻩ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻟﻮﮔﻮﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﺒﺘﻼ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺧﺐ ،ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻗـﻮﻱ ﻛﻢ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥﻫﺎ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ 10ﺳﺎﻝ ﻫﻴﭻﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺣﺬﻑ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸــﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﺠﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺩﺍﻭﺭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﺮﻭﺑﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻠﺨﺘﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﺑﻌﻀﻲ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻛﭙﻲﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ 2ﻭ 3ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻏﻠﻂﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻭﻟﻲ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ
ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ
ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﻭﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺿﻌﻴﻒﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺸــﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ،
ﻃﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﭽﻪ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﻛﻠﻪ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕﻫﺎ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺑﺰﻧﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻲ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺑﭽﻪ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﺮﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﺠﻤﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﺷــﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﺪ .ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻔﻜﺮﻫﺎ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﺮﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻧﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻻﻥ ﺳﻪ ﻣﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺲ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤــﺎﻡ ﺗﻴﺰﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺑﻠﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﻲ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﭘﻮﻝ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷــﺪ ،ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺧــﺪﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ! ﻃﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻱ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ 8ﻣﻴﻠﻴﺎﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﻭﺷــﺪ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ ﻭ ﻟﺲﺁﻧﺠﻠﺲﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ ﻭ
ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ BBCﻭ MBC،
VOAﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﻴﺘﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪ
ﻟﺲﺁﻧﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ »ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ
ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺨﺖ
ﺗﺤﻘﻴﺮﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ! ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺧﺘﺎﭘﻮﺳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳــﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻟﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻴﺶ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ.
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺨﺎﻃــﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎﻓﻴﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﺯﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﺭﺷــﺎﺩ ﺑــﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﺳــﺮ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ
ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴـﺪ ﭼـﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ ﭼﻄـﻮﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﺪ؟
ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺷــﺤﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺳﺘﻢ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻴﺐ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺴــﺖ .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻴﺐ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﺳــﺖ .ﻣﺴــﺘﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻢ ،ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫــﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻢ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻡ ،ﭼﻨﺪ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﻧﺪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﺴﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ .ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺑﭽﻪ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮ ﻧﻔﺴﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﻖ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ .ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﻖ
ﺑﺪﻩ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ،
ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﭘﺨﺶﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ،
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻟﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻚ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ.
ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﺷــﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻭﻟﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻫﻢ ﻃﻠﺒﻜﺎﺭﻧﺪ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳــﻲ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ.
ﭼﻪ ﺟﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ؟
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺭﺩ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﺧﻮﺏﻭﻫﻢﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙﺍﺳﺖ.ﺍﮔﺮﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎﻱﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖﻫﻢﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﻲﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ
ﻣﻤﻜﻦﺍﺳﺖﺍﻳﻦﻭﺳﻂﻗﻴﭽﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ.ﺍﺯﻫﺮﻃﺮﻑﭘﺮﻭﺑﺎﻝﻣﺎﺭﺍﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﻧﻴﻮﻳﻮﺭﻙ ﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ ﻭ ﻟﺲﺁﻧﺠﻠﺲﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ ﻭ ﺷــﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ
BBCﻭ VOA،MBCﻭﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﺍﻳﻦﻓﻴﻠﻢﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺘﻌــﺪﺩ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ .ﺗﻴﺘﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣــﻪ ﻟﺲﺁﻧﺠﻠﺲ ﺗﺎﻳﻤــﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ
»ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﺭﻳﺨﺖ«.ﻛﺎﻓﻲﺑﻮﺩﻳﻚﻫﻔﺘﻪﻧﺎﻣﻪﺿﻌﻴﻒﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻓﻴﻠﻢﻳﻜﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻫﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻨﻮﻳﺴــﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺗﻴﺘﺮ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺳــﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻔﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ
ﻧﺸﻮﺩ؟ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻣﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺑﺎ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻃﻨﺰ ،ﺷﻮﺧﻲ
ﺷــﻮﺧﻲ ﺣﺮﻓﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺯﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻝ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ
ﺩﺭﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﺳﺎﺧﺖ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻣﺠﻴﺪﺭﺟﺒﻰ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭ:
ﭼﻪ ﻋﻴﺒﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻬﺮﺟﻮﻳﻲ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ
ﻣﺼﻄﻔﻲ ﺷﻮﻗﻲ
ﻣﺠﻴﺪ ﺭﺟﺒﻲﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺳﻴﻤﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﺷﻴﻚﭘﻮﺵ ،ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﺭﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺍﻭﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ .ﺭﺟﺒﻲﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﺘﺢ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﻠﻎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺭﺟﺒﻲﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻛﻼﻣﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ .ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﻛﻴﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ» ،ﺩﻥ ﻛﻴﺸﻮﺕ« ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻲ ﻛﺸﻴﺪ ،ﺭﺟﺒﻲ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ.
ﭼﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽـﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻰ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻗﺮﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻛﺮﺩﮔﻰ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﮔﻰ ﺻﺪﺍﻡ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺷﻮﻙ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯ 31ﺷﻬﺮﻳﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﻙ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺣﻀﺮﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻰ ،ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ
ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺳﻠﺒﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺗﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻤﻚ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻠﺢ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ
ﻣﺎﻩ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻠﻮﭼﺴﺘﺎﻥ
ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻛــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠــﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ
ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﺸــﻬﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﻳﻚ ﺗﻌﺒﻴــﺮﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳﭙﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﭼﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺗﻨﮕﻪ ﺍ ُﺣﺪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﺻﻴﺎﻧﺖ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺮﻗﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﮔــﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻــﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫــﺎﻯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ« .ﺁﻗﺎ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﺳﻮﺩﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺷﺪ .ﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﺿﻪ ﻣﺮﺯﻯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻗــﺎ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺣﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻫﺠﻤﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ
ﻭ ﺣﻤﻠﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺍﻕ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﺸﺎﮔﺮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺧﺎﻧﺰﺩﻩ
ﺟﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ .ﺑــﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘــﻼﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻭﺭﻭﺩﻯ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ)ﺭﻩ( ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻣﺴـﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ
ﻫﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧـﺪ؛ ﻳﻚ ﺧﺪﻣـﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿـﻮﻉ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ.
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻄــﻊ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴــﺮﻯ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ
ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﻳﻨــﻰ ﻭ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧــﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺳــﻠﺤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﺠﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﺎ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺟﺎﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻭ
ﺟﻨﺎﻳــﺎﺕ ﺑــﺰﺭگ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺮﻣﺸــﻬﺮ،
ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ
ﺳﻮﺳــﻨﮕﺮﺩ ،ﻫﻮﻳﺰﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣــﻮﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ،ﭼــﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻫــﺎﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﻮﺳــﻴﻘﻰ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺳــﺮﺍﺝ
ﺳﻮﺳــﻨﮕﺮﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻏﻴﺮﺕ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻭ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺗﺼﻨﻴــﻒ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻯ
ﻣﻠﻰ ﻭ ﻭﺟﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ
»ﻛﻮﭼﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻮﻯ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﻗﺎ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ« ﻳــﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ.ﻳﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ
ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﺷﺎﻥ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺧﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ
ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬــﻪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻣــﻮﺯﺵ ﻫﻢ
ﻧﻴــﺰ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠــﻪ
ﻧﺪﻳــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﻠﺤﻪ
ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﺳــﻴﺪ ﻣﺮﺗﻀــﻰ ﺁﻭﻳﻨﻰ ﺍﺯ
135
ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﺠﺎ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻳﻜﺴــﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﻚﭘﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ .ﻣﺜــﻞ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻰ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻓﻊ ﻓﺎﺳــﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.ﻣﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮﺳــﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﺷــﻤﺎ .ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺣﻔﻆ ﮔﺮﻣﺎ ﭘﺎﺭﭼﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻯ ﮔــﺮﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﻔﻴﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﭼﻔﻴﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭼﻔﻴﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻼﻙ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﻫﻮﻳﺖﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷﻨﺎﺳــﺎﻳﻰ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷــﻬﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻋﻤﺪﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻬﺪﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﮔﺸــﺖ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻧﻜﺸﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻼﻙ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ
ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺗﻮﺳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺑﻴﺖ)ﻉ( ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺜﻼ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﺣﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺻﺪﺍﻯ
ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺗﻬﻴﻴﺞ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺴﺘﺎﻥ
59ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﭙﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺯﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺁﻫﻨﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻮﺣﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺍﻯ ﺷﻬﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﻥ ﻏﻠﺘﺎﻥ
ﺧﻮﺯﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﺩ« ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻌﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺣﺎﺝ
ﺁﻗﺎ ﻧﻌﻠﻤﻲ ﺳــﺮﻭﺩﻩ ﺑــﻮﺩ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺣﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻨــﺎﻥ ﮔﻞ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺑــﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻮﺣﻪ ﺍﺳﺎﻣﻲ ﺷﻬﺪﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺯﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ.ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺑﻪﺟﺰ ﭘﻴﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻓﺮﺍﺧــﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ
ﻧﻮﺣﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻯ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺗﻰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ
ﺣﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺁﻭﻳﻨﻰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴــﺘﻨﺪﻯ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺷــﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴــﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﻣﻬﻢ
ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻜﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺟﺎﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻡ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥ ﺳــﭙﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﺳﺎﻝ67
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺘﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﻧﻘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺒﻬﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﺻﻠﻰﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻤﺮﺑﻨﺪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 60ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺷــﻨﻰ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻜﻢ ﺑﺒﻨﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺳﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﻣﻼﻗﻠﻰﭘﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ
ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻋﻜﺎﺳــﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺯﺧﻤﻲ ﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺑﺮﻭﻯ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻠﻰ ﻣﺼﻠﺤﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﻫﻢ ﻳﺎﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎﻯ 16ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻤﺘﺮﻯ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺳــﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﻣﻼﻗﻠﻰﭘﻮﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ؛ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺸﺎﺭﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒﻣﺮﺩﻡﻭﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﺍﻥﻭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥﺍﺭﺗﺶﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ.ﺍﻣﺎﻡﺩﺭﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺯﺧﻤﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻳﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺗﺠﺴﻤﻲ،ﮔﺮﺍﻓﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻛﺎﺭﻳﻜﺎﺗﻮﺭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺷــﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢﻛﺸﻮﺭﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪﻳﺎ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯﺷﻬﺪﺍﻣﻮﺭﺩﺗﻜﺮﻳﻢﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ،ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺒﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺯﻭﺩ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰﻫﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﭘﺬﻳـﺮﺵ ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣـﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳـﺎﻥ
ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﺟﻨـﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗـﻊ ﻳﻚﺟـﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﺷــﮕﺎﻩ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﻫﻢﺭﻳﺨﺘﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ
ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥﻧﻤﺎﺩﻯﺍﺯﻗﻀﻴﻪﺷﻜﻞﮔﺮﻓﺖ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﻓـﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻛﻪﻗﺮﺍﺭﺑﻮﺩﺭﻓﺎﻩﺭﺍﺩﺭﻫﻤﻪﻛﺸﻮﺭﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﺘﺢ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ
ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﺷﺎﻥ
ﻛﻨﺪ.ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﺍﻳﻦﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻭﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﺩﺭﺍﻭﺍﻳﻞ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻭ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨـﮓ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺩﭼﺎﺭ
ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ
ﺗﻀـﺎﺩ ﺷـﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺧﻴﻠــﻰ ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﻛﺎﺭﺷـﺎﻥ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻭ ﺣﺮﺍﺳـﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺳــﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻋﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻫـﺎﻯ ﺩﻓـﺎﻉ ﻣﻘـﺪﺱ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻧﻴـﺰ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺑﻮﺭﻭﻛﺮﺍﺳـﻰ
ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻗﻊ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺿﻤﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﺠﺎ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪﺍﻯ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ
ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺪﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺭﻓﺎﻩﺯﺩﮔﻰ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺍﻳﻦﻳﻚﺳﻮﺍﻝﻣﻬﻢﺍﺳﺖ.ﺑﻌﺪﺍﺯﺟﻨﮓ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺑــﺮﻭﺩ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﻠﻰﺯﻭﺩﻣﺎﺍﺯﺟﻨﮓﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺳﻮﺍﻻﺗﻰ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ
ﻗﺼﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻧﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎﻡ ﻫﻴــﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﮕﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺴــﺖ ﭘﺲ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺍﻣــﺎﻡ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪ،ﺟﻨﮓﺭﺍﺑﻪﻛﻨﺎﺭﻯﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ
ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮﻗﻄﻌﻨﺎﻣﻪﺭﺍﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖﻭﺑﺮﺧﻰ
136
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻴﻮﻥﻭﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻥﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﺍﻣﺎﻡﺭﺍﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪﻛﻪﺑﻪﺟﻨﮓﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ
ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﺯﺍﺭ
ﻭ ﺍﺫﻳﺖ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﻬﺪﺍ ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ،ﺷﺪ.
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫـﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻣﺪﻋﻰ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘـﺪﺱ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻨﻮﻳﺮ
ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ،ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻰ ﻣﺸــﻐﻮﻝ
ﺷﻜﻞﺩﻫﻰ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻰ ﻭ
ﺁﻧﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻪ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺏ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻓﺎﻩﺯﺩﮔﻰ.
ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﻛﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺭﻛﻮﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺿﺪﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﺧﺎﺹ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺁﻭﻳﻨﻰ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻭ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﻼﻗﻠﻰﭘﻮﺭ ،ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎ،
ﺩﺭﻭﻳﺶ ﻭ ...ﮔﺮﺍﻓﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺧﺴــﺮﻭﺟﺮﺩﻯ ،ﻛﺎﻇﻢ
ﭼﻠﻴﭙﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺻﺮ ﭘﻠﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺠﺴــﻤﻰ ،ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﭘﺎﺭﺳﺎﻳﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻴﺐ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺗﻜﻠﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻟﺖﺷــﺎﻥ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ
ﺩﻭﻡ ﺑــﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﺮﺍﻕ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺟــﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻬﺎﺟﻢ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺮﺗﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻮﺷﺰﺩ
ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺁﻭﻳﻨﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 70ﻃﺮﺣﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺭﻧﺠﻨﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻣﻘﺎﻡﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﮔﻨﺠﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﻳﻢ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺳﻴﺪ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺯﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻨﺞ ﺍﺳــﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻏﺶ ﺑﺮﻭﻳﻢ ،ﻣﺜﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﺪﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻏﻨﻰ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻯ
ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﺁﻭﻳﻨﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﺩ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﺘﺢ
ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ.
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧــﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ ﻧﻮﺷــﺖ
ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺷــﺪ .ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻰ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛــﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺜــﻼ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﺘﺢ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﻰﻣﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 72ﻛﻪ ﺷﻬﻴﺪﺁﻭﻳﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﺭﺳــﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﻙ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﺧﻴﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ
ﺗﻠﻨﮕﺮ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺗﺸــﻴﻴﻊ ﭘﻴﻜﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻖ ﺍﻭ ﺟﻔﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﺁﻗﺎ
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﻳــﻚ ﻧﻘﻄﻪﻋﻄﻔﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻓــﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘــﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺣﺲ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺁﻗﺎ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﭼﺮﺍﻍ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺷــﻤﺎ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻯﺗﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ
ﻓﺘﺢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩ ،ﺑﻰﻣﻴﻠﻰﻫﺎ ،ﺟﻔﺎﻛﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎ ،ﺑﻰﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻰﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭﻩ
ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺯﺩ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺒﻠﻮﺭﻯ
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﺁﻭﻳﻨﻰ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺟﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻻﻥ ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻔﺎﻛﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎ
ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺗﻜﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺠﺎﻣﻊ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻣﺎ
ﺗﻜﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺎﺩﺕ ﻣﺮﺗﻀﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ
ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﺘﺢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺳﺴﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﺩﺍﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﭘﻨﺞ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻮﺳـﻂ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﺷﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻰ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻰ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷـﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿـﻮﻉ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ
ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﻓﻴﻖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻥ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﻢ .ﺑﻨﺪﻩ
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻻﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﺮﻓﺘﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﻏﻴﺮﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﺩژﺑﺎﻥ ،ﺻﺒﺤﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ
ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻻﺕ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎ
ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﻳﻜـﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ،ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻰ ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺟــﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻴــﺰﺍﻥ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻣﻄﻠﻊ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﻪ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺎﺿﺮﻡ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﺍﺻﻼ
ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﺠﺎﻟﻰ ﺑﺰﻧﻢ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻭ ﺍﻟﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻯ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴــﺎ ،ﻣﺠﻴﺪﻯ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻣﻼﻗﻠﻰﭘﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ
ﺳﺨﺘﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴــﺎ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻓــﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴــﻞ ﺑﺪﻫﻰ ﻭ
ﻣﺸــﻜﻼﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻧﻜﻰ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺟﻠﺐ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ،ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺁﺳﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨـﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺸـﻜﻼﺕ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳـﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻋﺮﺽ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻣﺜــﻞ ﻣﻴﻢ .ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ
ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺧﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻗﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﻣﺮﺣﻮﻡ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ 72ﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻻﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ؟
ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ 10ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻣﺜــﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻰ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻋﺮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺑﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ
ﻣﻰﺷﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻠﻴﺸــﻪﺍﻯ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺷﻰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ
ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺻﻼ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯﺍﻥ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻠﻚ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗـﺎﻫﻤﻴـﻦﻛﻠﻴﺸـﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰﻛـﻪﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻴـﺪ ،ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻯ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭﺷﺪﻩﻣﻴﺎﻥﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎ،ﻣﻼﻗﻠﻰﭘﻮﺭﻭ...
ﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﻭﻗﺘﻰﻣﺜﻼﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎﻓﻴﻠﻢﺟﻨﮕﻰﻧﻤﻰﺳﺎﺯﺩ،ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺍﺳﺖ.ﺍﺯﺩﻭﻃﺮﻑﻳﻚﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁﻭﺗﻔﺮﻳﻂﻭﺟﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﭘﻮﺭﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﺘﻰ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﺮﺟﻮﻳﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ ،ﭼﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩﻯ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﮔﺮﺍﻧﺪﻳﺶ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﻫﻮﺍﭘﻴﻤﺎ
ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻰﻓﺮﺳــﺘﻴﻢ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻠﺤﺸــﻮﺭﻯ
ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻣﺜﻞ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳــﻬﻴﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻣﺜﻼ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﻧﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺜﻼ ﺩﻩﻧﻤﻜﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﺩ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐﺳــﺎﺯﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﻟﻄﻴﻒ ﻭ ﻇﺮﻳﻒ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻯ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻰ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺷــﺘﺒﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻤﺎﻕ ﺗﻜﻔﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎﻻﻯ ﺳﺮﺵ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻓﺘﺢ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻰ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻰﻛﻴﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺼﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻧﻨﺪ .ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺧﺮﺍﺟﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﺎﻟـﻰ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺴـﻨﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣــﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ
ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﻫﻢ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﮔﺮﻭﻫﻰ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺁﻗﺎﻯ ﺷﻤﺨﺎﻧﻰ ﻣﻰﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴــﺎﺯﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺳﻤﻰ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻴﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻧﻨﺪ.
137
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻛﺮﻳﻤﻰﺍﺯﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕﺁژﺍﻧﺲﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻯ
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺑﻐﺾ
ﻓﺮﻭﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳـﻦ ﻧﻘﻄـﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧـﻪ ﺩﻓﺘـﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨـﺪﻩ
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱﻭﻛﻤﻲﺁﻥﻃﺮﻑﺗﺮﺍﺯﻛﺘﺎﺏ»ﻛﺘﺎﺏﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ« ﺳﻴﻤﺮﻏﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩﮔﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ
ﺷـﻴﺮﻳﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺯﻧـﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻬﺪﻱ
ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻰ ﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺘﻦ
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻬﺪﻱ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ.
***
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨـﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻝ
ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﻣﻮﺳﺴــﻪ ﻭﺭﺍ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺍﺧﺮ
ﺳــﺎﻝ 75ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺗﻴﺮ ﺳﺎﻝ
76ﺻﺤﺒﺘــﻲ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﻛــﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻴﺞ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻣﺎ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ .ﮔﻔﺘﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸــﻪﺍﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻣﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺎﺗﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ
ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻧﺸــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣــﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻡ ﻭ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ،ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺭﺍ ﻫﻨﺮ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﻱ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺟﺬﺏ ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯﻱ
ﺳــﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫــﻢ ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺎﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﺸـﺎﻥ ﺗـﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻨـﺪ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺑﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗـﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺰﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲﺷﻴﺸـﻪﺍﻱ
ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ؟
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ.
ﺁﻗــﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺳﻮﺍﺑﻖ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ.
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀـﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﻟﻬﺮﻩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﺮﺳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭﺍﺕ
ﻛﺴﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻘﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﻑ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻘﺪﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻮژﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ
ﺁﻥ ﻣﺼﻤﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ .ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﺭﺍﺳــﺨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺎﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ
ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺪﺍﺑﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺒﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ
138
ﻧﺸﻮﻳﻢ .ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻳﻢ.
ﺣﺘـﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﭘﻴـﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺘﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻟﻮﻛﻴﺸﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱﻣﺎ ﺧﺒﺮﻧﮕﺎﺭﻭﻋﻜﺎﺳﻲ ﻭﺭﻭﺩﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ.ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳــﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻧﺮﻭﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ،ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦﻓﻴﻠﻢﺭﺍﻃﺒﻖﺭﻭﺍﻝﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝﺩﺭﺍﺳﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮﻱﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ
ﻓﺎﺭﺍﺑﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫــﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﺭﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻳــﻢ .ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ
ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱﺭﺍﺩﺭﻋﺮﻭﺝﻓﻴﻠﻢﻛﻪﻣﻜﺎﻥﺧﻠﻮﺗﻲﺑﻮﺩﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﺮﺱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ؟
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸــﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻻﻥ ﻫــﻢ ﺑﻪﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﭘﻼﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﻼﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻮءﺗﻔﺎﻫﻢ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﺁﻥ ﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖ ،ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ
ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭﭼﻨﻴﻦﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲﻭﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲﻛﻪﺑﺎﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻳﺪ ،ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ؟
ﺻﺪﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺁﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺧﻄﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻴﺜﻴﺖ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺷﻐﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴــﻲ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﺭﻳﺴﻚ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﻳﺴــﻚ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻳﺴﻚ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﻴﺶﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻣﺎﺩﻱﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣــﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺲ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ،ﺍﺻﻐﺮ ﺗﻘﻲﺯﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺧﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ» :ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﻴﺮ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺮﻳﻤﻲ ،ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﻜﻲ
ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ«.
ﻳﻌﻨـﻲ ﺩﻟﻬﺮﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺏﻫـﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑـﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻫﻢ
ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺯﺑﺮ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﭘﻴـﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴـﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫـﺎﻱ ﺷـﺨﺼﻲ ﻛـﻪ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻗـﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻴﺪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﺘـﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺳـﻤﺖ ﺳـﺎﺧﺖ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺳـﻮﻕ ﺩﺍﺩ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﺪ.
ﺧــﻮﺩﻡ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸــﻪﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻐﺾ
ﻓﺮﻭﺧــﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎﺳــﺖ .ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺝﻣﻴﻨﻮ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻱ
ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻫﻦ ﻳﻮﺳــﻒ ،ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﺷﺪ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﻭﻗﻔﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ
ﺷﻴﺸــﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻠﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ
ﺷﺪ.
ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻲﺳﺎﺧﺘﻴﻢ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺷـﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻧﻜﻨـﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻫـﻢ ﻧﻴـﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻲﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺗﻮﻗﻴﻒ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﻦ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺍﺣﻀﺎﺭﻳﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺁﻣﺪ .ﺷــﺎﻛﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﻭ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺳــﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳﻼﺡ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻓﺴــﺮ ﻣﺎ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﻴﻠﻰ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺗﻌﺎﺑﻴﺮ ﻭ
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻛﻤﻲ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺩﻝﺗﺮ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣــﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻴﻢ ﺗﻤــﺎﻡ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱ
ﻧﻴــﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻃﻲ ﻛــﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧــﻮﺩﺭﻭ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﻋﻘﻴﺪﺗﻲ -ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﻭﺷﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻗﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻧﺸــﻮﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺘﻴﻢ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺯﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺭﺁﻳﺪ،
ﺭﻓﺘﻴــﻢ ﻭ ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻤﺮﻙ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﺍﻥ
ﻧﻴــﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻲﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳــﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭ ﺭﺍ
ﺭﻧﮓ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﺭﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩﻳﻢ .ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻌﻨـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﻝ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻤﻜـﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲﺷﻴﺸـﻪﺍﻱ
ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﻜــﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﻝ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑــﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ
ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪ ژ 3ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﺮﻙ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺷﻠﻴﻚ،
ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻳﻢ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻱ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﻌﻤﻴﺮ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺷــﻠﻴﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ
ﻟﻄﻔﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻟﺸﻜﺮ 27ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻴﮕﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻫﻠﻴﻜﻮﭘﺘﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳـﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ
ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺁﻥ ﻫﻠﻴﻜﻮﭘﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻼﻝﺍﺣﻤﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻫﻼﻝ ﺍﺣﻤﺮ
ﺭﻓﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻠﻴﻜﻮﭘﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺧﺮﺩﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ 12ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﻮﺍﺷﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ .ﻣﻦ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻢ ﺍﺣﺴــﺎﺱ
ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸــﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻴﺞ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﺪ .ﭘــﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻫــﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤــﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛــﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ.
ﭘﺲ ﭼـﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﭘـﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﻭ
ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ؟
ﻗﻄﻊ ﻧﺸﺪ .ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻄﻒ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ .ﺑﻌــﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣــﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﻣﻮﺝ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﻡ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﻥ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻧﺸﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ
ﺳــﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻳﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﺪ
ﻳﺎ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣــﻪ ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﺜﻠــﺚ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻡ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ
ﺳــﺎﺩﻩ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺷــﻠﻮﻏﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺧﻠﻮﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﺣﺘﻲ
ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﻢ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺴــﺎﺯﻳﻢ .ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤــﺎﻥ ﻭ 45ﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﻟﻮﻛﻴﺸﻦ ﮔﺸﺘﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳــﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺸﻢ ﺳﺮﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩﻳﻢ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺎ ﮔﺮﺍﻥﺗﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷــﺪ .ﭼﻪ ﺑﺴﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﭘﺮﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﺳﺖﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿـﺮ ﻧﻘﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴـﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ
ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟
ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺖ ﺧﻮﺷﻢ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺖ ﺧﻮﺷﻢ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻓﻼﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻲ.
ﻳﻌﻨـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﻴـﻪ ﺁژﺍﻧـﺲ ﺷﻴﺸـﻪﺍﻱ ﻫـﻢ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻧﻈـﺮ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻴﺪ؟
ﺑــﻪ ﻫــﺮ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﺘــﻼﻑ ﻧﻈــﺮ ﻭﺟــﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻗﺒــﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ
ﺁژﺍﻧﺲ ﺷﻴﺸــﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﻃﺮﺍﺡ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻡ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻥ
ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻼﻥ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ.
139
ﺍﺯﻛﺮﺧﻪﺗﺎﺭﺍﻳﻦﺩﺭﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﺑﺎ
ﻋﻠﻲﺩﻫﻜﺮﺩﻱ
ﻋﻘﺒﮕﺮﺩ
ﺩﺭﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻧﮕﺬﺷـﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻛﺸـﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺛﺒﺖ
ﺭﺳـﻴﺪ» .ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ« ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻃﺮﻓﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻠﻲ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﺩ؛ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ
ﺳـﻴﻠﻲ ﺯﺩﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻫﻤﺮﺯﻣﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ
ﻛﺸﻴﺪ.ﺻﺤﻨﻪﺍﻱﻛﻪﺻﻔﺎﻳﻲﺳﻴﻠﻲﺑﻪﮔﻮﺵﻋﻠﻲﺩﻫﻜﺮﺩﻱ
ﻣﻲﻧـﻮﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺑـﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﮕـﻪ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻣﺖ«.
ﻋﻠﻲ ﺩﻫﻜﺮﺩﻱ ،ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ 18
ﺳـﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻭ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
***
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﺷـﻤﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﻫﻴﺪ؟
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ« ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﻋﻴﺎﺭ ،ﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﻭ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺳــﺖ؛ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ»ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ
ﺭﺍﻳﻦ« ﺑﻪ ﺑﺤﺚﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺷﺪﻳﻢ .ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﺧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻫﻢ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺑﺪﻳﻞ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻀﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺍﺭﺯﺵﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺟﺪﻱ
ﻭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺟﻨﮓﻫــﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛــﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ
ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ ﺩﺭﺍﻣﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻫﺸــﺖ ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫــﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﺗﻮﺟــﻪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺷــﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻬﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺰﻭ
ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﺑﻴﻨﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺼﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ
ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺛﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻓــﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﺳﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﻫﺮ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﮔﻲ ﻳﺎ ﭘﻠﻴﺴﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ.
ﺷـﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻏﻴﺮﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﻭ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ
ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﺎﺭﮔــﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻪﺗﺒﻊ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ -ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ -ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ
140
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺁﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺻﺒﺢ ﺳﺮ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺷﺐ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻨﺎﺯﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺟﻠﺴــﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﺒﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ،
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻣــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ ﻛــﻪ ﺫﺭﻩ ﺫﺭﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭘﻼﻥ
ﭘﻼﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻘﺪﺳﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ،ﺟﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺧﺖ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠــﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺁﻥ ،ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺟﺪﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺣﺪﻭﺩ 18ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ،ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺗﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﺁﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺧﻮﺷــﺤﺎﻝ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﺳﻬﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﻨﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻱ ،ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳــﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ.
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﻠﺨﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ
ﺑﻴﻨﻨـﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻳـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠـﻢ ﺑـﻪ ﺑـﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟
ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﺻﻼ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ
ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻱ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ
ﻣﺠــﺰﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻜــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻲ
ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺕ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ،ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﺎﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻨﺎﻣﻪ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺷﺨﺺ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ
ﺑﺮﺧـﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻧﺨﺴـﺘﻴﻦ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ؟
ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺧــﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺗــﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻲ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﻫــﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺷــﺘﻪ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰ
ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﺩﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﻢ
ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﺍﻡ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﻏﺮﻭﺭ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻲ
ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻢ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻢ .ﭘﺸﺘﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻢ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻟﻤﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ .ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﺴــﺎﺕ ﺗﻤﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻴﻦ
ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺎﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻡ.
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ
ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷـﺘﻴﺪ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻴﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ
ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺳــﻬﻢ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻗﺒﻞ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﻏﻴﺮﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ
ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺎﺏ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻳﭽﻪ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺠﺮﻱ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﺫﻫﻨﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﻛــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ.
ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻭ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻛﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺵ
ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺳﻬﻢ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﻳﭽﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﮔﺸﻮﺩ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻮﺩ؟
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻮﻛﻴﺸﻦ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ »ﺑﻠﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺳﺎﺣﻞ« ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﻮﺷﻚﺑﺎﺭﺍﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﻝ 71ﭼﻨﺪ
ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﮔﻠﻮﻟﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺑﺮﭘﻴﻜﺮﻩ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﻠﻴﻚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺸــﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﻠﻮﻟﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻨﻔﺠﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ
ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺷﻜﻮﻓﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ
ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﺟﺴﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﻟﻒ ﭘﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ؛
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ »ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ« ﻧﻘﺶ ﻧﻮﺫﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﭘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻠﻜﻮﺗﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻌﻀﻲﻫﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺳــﻬﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻋﺪﻡ
ﺭﺳــﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﻳﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣــﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ
ﺟﺴﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﺑﻴﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ
ﻋﺎﻣﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻴﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲﻛﻴﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﺪ.
ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕـﺮ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﺮ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﺩﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ
ﻣﺮﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ،
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ
ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧـﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﺗـﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﺪ؟
ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻏﻴﺮﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻟﻤﺸﻐﻮﻟﻲ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ
ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﻭﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻡ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ
ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﺟﺴﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﺳــﻄﻪ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ،
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪﺍﺵ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ
ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻨﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺍﻳﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻦ
ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﺴﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺟﺴﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﭼﺎپ ﻋﻜﺲ ﻫﻨﺮﭘﻴﺸﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺗﻲﺷﺮﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳــﻨﺪ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻖ
ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﻗﻤﻪ ﻇﻠﻢ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻫﮕﺬﺭ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺟﺴﺎﺭﺕ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﭽﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﻣﻠﻲ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺷــﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ
ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻬﺪﺍ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺛـﺮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﺛﺮﮔـﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ
ﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﻓﻀﺎ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ؟
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻓــﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻭﻟﻲ
ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﺎﺻﻠــﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻫﺮ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﭼﻪ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﺧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ .ﻋﻠﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﮕﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻡ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
141
ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰﺑﻪﺑﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎﻭﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪﻫﺎﻯﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱﺩﺭﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﺍﺛﺮ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﺶ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ
ﻧﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﺪﻭﺳﺖ
ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺑﺸﺨﻮﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻢ
ﺳــﺨﺖ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺳﻬﻞ .ﺳــﺨﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻮﺗﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﺸﻨﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻨﺠﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﺪﻝ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﮔﺎﻩ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺟﻬﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ
ﻣﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﺎﺧﺮ
ﻣﻮﺭﺍﻛﺎﻣﻰ -ﻛﺎﻓﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺮﺍﻧﻪ -ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﻩ ژﺍﭘﻨﻰ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ
ﺳــﻨﺠﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﻰﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻦﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻧﻜﻮﻫﺶ ﺟﻨﮓ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﮔﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ژﺍﻧﺮ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻯ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ،ﺁﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻧﻘﺪ ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻃﺒﻪ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ؛ ﺭﻭﺍﻟﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺟﺰ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻣﻴﺎﻥﻣﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻳــﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘــﺪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻝ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘــﺎﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺷــﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳــﻦ ژﺍﻧﺮ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺑﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ژﺍﻧﺮ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ
ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ،ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺤﻠﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﺭﺍ »ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺲ« ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺑﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻠﻰ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻰ ﭘﻮﺷــﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﺱ ﺁﻥ ،ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ
142
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻘﺪﺳــﺶ ﺑﻜﺎﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ،ﺣﺼﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ژﺍﻧﺮ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪ .ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ
ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ژﺍﻧﺮ -ﺑﻪﺯﻋﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ -ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺴﺎﻙ
ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻭﺟﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻯ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻭﺟﻬﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻧﺪ .ﮔﻮﺍﻩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺳــﻮﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؛ ﺭﻣﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴــﻦ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺛــﺮ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ،
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻯ ،ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥﺑﻨﺪﻯ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ
ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﺩ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺳﺮ ﻭ
ﺻﺪﺍﻳﻰ ﺯﻭﺩﮔﺬﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻬﺠﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺁﻓﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻓﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ژﺍﻧﺮ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑــﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰﻫﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺹ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰﺍﺵ ﺑﺮﺳــﺪ .ﺑﻰﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ
ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺁﺛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ
ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻦ
ﻭ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ،
ﺭﻭﺡ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺛﺮﻯ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ
ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩﺍﺵ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺴﻴﻦ
ﻓﺘﺎﺣﻰ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﺍﺛﺮ »ﺗﻜﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ« ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ» :ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﺑﺴــﺘﺮ ﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ
ﻃﻲ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ﺑﻌﺜﻲ ،ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﺷﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﺜﺎﺭﮔﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻳﻌﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﮕﺎﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﺎﺑﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻳﻚﺻﺪﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﺳﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﺣﻖ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ.
ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﺳــﭙﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼ ﺁﺷــﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ،ﺁﻓﺘﻰ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻰ ﻭ ﻛﻢﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻮﻟﻪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺰﻭﻯ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﺿﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺧﺎﻧﻰ ،ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﺭﻣﺎﻥ »ﺑﻴﻮﺗﻦ« ﻧﺎﻣﺶ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﺮﺁﻭﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻥ
ﺭﺍﻳﺰﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ،ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻭ ﻧﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ
ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ژﺍﻧﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ«.
ژﺍﻧﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﺮ
ﻗﺴﻤﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﺷــﺪﻥ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﺭﺳﻲ ﻧﺜﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﺪ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ
ﻧﺜﺮ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺣﺴــﻴﻦ ﻓﺘﺎﺣﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻈــﺮ ﺍﻣﻴﺮﺧﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷــﻜﻠﻰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ» :ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛــﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ،
ﻛﺎﺵ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻫــﻢ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﻲ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺷــﻜﻮﻓﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺯﺩﻳﻢ .ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺸــﻜﻠﻲ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻳﺪ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻫﺮﻛﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻛﻢﻛﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻲﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﮕﻰ ﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺿﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷــﺮﺍﻓﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺎﻟﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﻭ ﺿﺮﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺯﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺴــﭙﺮﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺤﺚ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ«.
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﻩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻰ؟
ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻩ
ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺎﻳﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻭﻯ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻴﺎﻩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻓﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻰ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ،
1984ﻭ ﺳﻔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻯ ﺷﺐ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺰﺭگ ﻭ ﻛﻢﻧﻈﻴﺮﻯ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ،ﺳﻴﺎﻩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻰ
ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻟﺰﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﻣﺎﻥ 1984ﺍﻭﺭﻭﻝ،
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﺸﺴــﺖ ﺳﺮﺍﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻭﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮﻯ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﺜﺮﻧﻮﻳﺲ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴــﺘﻢ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻋﺮﻑ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﮓ ﺳﻴﺎﻩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻰ ﺯﺩ ،ﻧﻤﻰﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ.
ﺍﺣﻤﺪ ﺷﺎﻛﺮﻯ -ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﻣﺨﻔﻰ -ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ
ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﻩﻧﻮﻳﺴﻰ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻌﻀﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺷــﻜﻮﻓﺎﻳﻰ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻀﻞ،
ﻫﻢ ﺷــﺎﻣﻞ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻧﻈﺮﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻞ ﺷــﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ
ﻣﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻯ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺗﻤﺎﻥ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻀﻞﻫﺎ ﻣﺪﻭﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻯ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﮔﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻫﻪﺍﻯ
ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻳﻜﺴﺮﻯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ
ﺍﻧﺪﻭﻫﮕﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﻩﻧﻮﻳﺴﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﺒﻌﺚ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﻩﻧﻮﻳﺴﻰ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ژﺍﻧﺮ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺿﺪﺟﻨﮓ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺑﺤﺚ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﮔــﺮﺩﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ »ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺿﺪﺟﻨﮓ«.
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻰ ﻗﺎﺋﻞﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﺮﺳﻴﺪ ،ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺣﺎﻣﻲ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ!
ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﺸــﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﺪﻯ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ژﺍﻧﺮ ﺍﺩﺑــﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺒﻰ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ
ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻫﺮﻩ ﺷﺮﻳﻌﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ »:ﻃﻰ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ
ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺭﻣﺎﻥ »ﺷــﻄﺮﻧﺞ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﺷــﻴﻦ ﻗﻴﺎﻣﺖ« ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻴﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﭼﺸــﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻯ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﻣﺎﻥﻧﻮﻳﺴﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻚ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻭﺳﻴﻊﺗﺮﻯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﻜﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ،ﺭﺷﺪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻗﺪﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻣﻰﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺎﺑﻘﻪ 100ﺳﺎﻟﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻪﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻰ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﻭ
ﭼﺸــﻤﮕﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪﻯ ،ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺭﻳﭽﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪ ﺩﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻠﻖ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻃﻮﺭﻯ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﺮﺍﻕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻘﺎﻳﻖ ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺱ ﻭ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ
ﻛﺸــﺪ .ﻣﺴﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪﺷﺪﺕ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﻩ ،ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﺍﺿﻴﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﺭ ﺑــﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺭﺍﻫﺶ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺗﻰ ﺑﺎﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ» :ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺱﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻮﺳﺖ ﺣﺲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻊ ﮔﻔﺘﻨﻲﻫﺎﺷــﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻗﻠﻢ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﺎﻙ ﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺸﻦ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺮﻳﻚ ﮔﻔﺖ«.
ﺍﻭ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ،
ﺳﻠﺤﺸــﻮﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ
ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﻚ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ
ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻘﻬﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ«.
ﺗﻜﻤﻠﻪ
ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻏﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻛﻤﺎﻛﺎﻥ ﻃﻴﻒ ﻭﺳﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﭘﻰﺟﻮﻯ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ،ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ -ﻳﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻜﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺎﺋﺒﻪﺍﻯ -ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺲ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﻧﻈﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻠﻴﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻠﻰ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻎ ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻟﻰ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺎﻻﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺶ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻳﺎﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﮔﺎﻟﻴﻤﺎﺭ ،ﺍﺯ ﭼﺎپ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ »ﺩﺭ ﺟﺴﺖﻭﺟﻮﻯ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ« ﻣﺎﺭﺳﻞ ﭘﺮﻭﺳﺖ ،ﺳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺯﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺭﺍﻫﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﺮﺩ.
143
ﮔﻔﺖﻭﮔﻮﺑﺎﺭﺿﺎﺭﺋﻴﺴﻰ،ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ،ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥﺣﺎﻝﻭﺭﻭﺯﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ،ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻰﮔﻤﺎﺭﻳﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﺭﺿﺎ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻲ ،ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ 1339ﻧﻬﺎﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻲﺍﺵ ،ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ .ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ-ﭘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ -ﺑﻪ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ
ﺗﺗﺤﺼﻴﻠﻲﺍﻡ ﺑﻲﺭﺑﻂ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺨﺼﺎ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﻧﺒﻴﻨﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﻴﺮﻡ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﻲ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﭽﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ ،ﭘﺸﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻠﻚ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻢ«.
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺋﻴﺴﻰ ،ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻥ ﺍﻋﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﻭ ﺭﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻧﺪﻭﺯﻯ
ﭼ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ » .ﻗﻄﺎﺭ « 57ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﺎﻟﺒﻰ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ» :ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻛﺎﺭﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺮ
ﺳﺎﻝ 1370ﺭﻭﻱ ﺧﺮﻣﺸﻬﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ،ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺎﻳﻪ ﺧﻠﻖ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺳ
ﺧﺮﻣﺸـﻬﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ«.ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻰ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﮔﭗ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻭﺍﻳﺎﻯ ﮔﻮﻧﺎﮔﻮﻧﻰ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻓﺖ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ
ﺧ
ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻻ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ .ﭘﺎﺳﺦﻫﺎ ﮔﺎﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ.
ﭼ
ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺷـﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﭼﻪ ﺿﺮﺭﻫﺎﻳـﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻻﺯﻡ،
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺯﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺑﺨﺸﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺧﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ .ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻨﺪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﺭﻭﺣﻲ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺤﺜﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺑﺤﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﺣﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﺸﺖﺳﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺶ ﻫــﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﭘﺸﺖﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺯﺩ .ﻣﻬﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺮﻭﺟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺷﺨﺎﺹ ،ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺷﺪ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕﺷــﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﭘــﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻰ ﻫــﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻂﻧﮕﻪﺩﺍﺭ
ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮﺍﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ ﺍﻳﺴــﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻰ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺍﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﻰ .ﺧﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﻩﺍﻯ
ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﮔﺎﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﻮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻓﻜﺮﻯﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺷــﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺣﺴــﺐ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﻳﻢ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﻋﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻟﺐﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ،ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻐﺮﺍﻓﻴﺎﻯ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻻﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ
ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﺎﺩﺍﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖﻫــﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻰ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺭﻭﺑﻪﺭﻭ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻭﻻ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﭼﺮﺍﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﻪﺳﺎﻻﺭﻱ
ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺛﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﺪ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺩﻟﺴــﻮﺯﻯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺵ ﻭ ﺭﺷﺪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻳﻚ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒ ،ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻫﺎ
ﺟﻨــﮓ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻣﻨﺘﻬــﺎ ﺑﺤﺚ
ﺗﺪﺍﺭﻛﺎﺗﭽﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﻭ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺎﻳﻰ
ﺍﺯ
ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩﻫــﺎﻯ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺩﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎ ﺑﻴــﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ،
ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣــﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄــﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻗﻠﻢ ﻗﺎﺑــﻞ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻭ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ،ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻲﻛﻪ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ
ﺧﻠﻖ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ
ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ،
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺳــﻴﻊﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞﺗﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ
ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﺩ
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘــﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﺍﺛﺮ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺕ
144
ﺍﺛﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺷــﺨﺺ ﻣﻮﻟﻒ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺪﺗﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺿﻊ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺱ ،ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻤﺎﺭﺩ
ﻭ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺳــﺮﺑﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴــﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻗﻠﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻂ
ﻗﺮﻣﺰﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﺍﻓﻊ .ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺎﺏ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ.
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳــﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ .ﻫــﻢ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻫﻢ
ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺛﺮ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ
ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶﺩﺍﺩﻩﺷﺪﻩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎﺩﺍﻣﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ
ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﻪﺳﺎﻻﺭﻱ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺪﺍﺭﻛﺎﺗﭽﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ
ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻋﺎﺩﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﻫﻤﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ
ﻭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﺩ.
ﭼﻪ ﺁﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﺪﻧﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﺮﻳﺢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻛﻨﻢ
ﺑﻰﺍﻃﻼﻋﻰ ،ﺑﻲﺳﻮﺍﺩﻯ ،ﺳــﺎﺩﻩﻧﮕﺮﻯ ﻭ ﺗﻨﮓﻧﻈﺮﻯ ،ﻛﺞﻓﻬﻤﻰ،
ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶﺩﺍﻭﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻞ ،ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺳــﻮﻳﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺳــﻴﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺳــﻔﻴﺪ ﺩﻳــﺪﻥ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺣﺎﺿــﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ،
ﺧﻮﺩﺳــﺮﻯ ،ﺩﺳــﺖﻛﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ
ﺍﻫﻞ ﻓﻦ ،ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺒﺘﻰ ﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺷﻰ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻦ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭ
ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﻫﻲ ﻟﺸــﻜﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻰﻧﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻏﻢ ﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ،
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ،ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻀﻞ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻫﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﻩ ،ﻧﻘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺟﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﺎﻳﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻰ ﻋﻤﺪﻩ
ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺳﺨﺖ
ﺍﺳــﺖ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ .ﺍﻳﻦﻛﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ
ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺴﻰ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻓﻜﺮﻯ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ .ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺸــﺎﻭﺭﻩ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ .ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﺎ،
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388
ﺑﺤﺚ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴــﺖ.
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ؟ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ
ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ:
ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ. ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮓ. ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡﺷﻨﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ .ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱﻣﺎ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻣــﺮﺩ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﺎﺭﻯ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻫﺰﻳﻨــﻪ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻰ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺗﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ ﻛﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻜﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳــﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺳــﺨﺖﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﺷﻨﺎﺳــﻲ .ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺴــﻠﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺿﺮﺏﺁﻫﻨﮓ ﻭﻫﺎﺭﻣﻮﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻰ
ﻫﻢ ﻭﺍژﻩ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺎ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟــﺎﻯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺑــﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺑﺮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺗﺠﺴــﻢ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ،
ﻏﻠﻮﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻳﺘﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺿﺮﺑﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ
ﻫﻢ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺤﺚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨــﮓ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯﺿﺮﻭﺭﻳﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺘﺎﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻛــﻢ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌــﻪ ﺑــﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻛﻢﺳــﻮﺍﺩﻱ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭﻛﻢ ﺍﻃﻼﻉ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻨﮓ.
ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ،ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻞﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺰﺭگ ،ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ
ﭼﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻛﻼ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺸــﺖ ﺳــﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﻪﻫﺎ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻫــﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﻭ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ .ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﻣﺎ ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻫﻢ ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﺩﺳﺖﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﺨﺼﻰ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ
ﺷﺨﺺ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ،
ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺷــﺎﻧﺘﺎژ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺍﻩﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺎﺛﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺭ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﭼﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺳﺎﻧﺴﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻰﺁﻳﺪ ،ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻌﻤﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﻫــﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻭﻳﮋﮔــﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ
ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺵﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ،
ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻰ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﻨﻨــﺪ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺵﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻰ ﺩﺍﻍ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺧﻮﺑﻲ
ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻝ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ
ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ.
ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺳــﻮﻡ ،ﻳﻌﻨــﻰ ﺍﺩﺑﻴــﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧــﺪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻳــﻢ ﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻧﮕﺎﻫــﺶ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺼﺐ ﻭ
ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳــﺎﺕ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﺶ ﺑﮕﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣــﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺑــﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻰ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺮﺯﻧﺶ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺧﺸــﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻰﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻃﻠﺒﻰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺑﻮﻫﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪ .ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻫﺮ
ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴـﺎﺕ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﺳﻴﺎﻩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳـﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳـﻴﺎﻩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑﻪﻃــﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻤﺖ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺵﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻲ
ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﻛﻢ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸــﻪ
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳــﻔﺎﺭﺵﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ،ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ
ﻛﺴــﺎﻧﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴــﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺣﺎﻻ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﻋﺎﺩﻯ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻼﻫﺎﻳــﻰ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ،ﻣﻬﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻃﺮﺣﻰ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳــﻴﺮ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﻳﻢ،
ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺑﻼﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺳﻮﺯﺍﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﺮﺗﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﻴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷــﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﺮﻭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ
ﻫﻢ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺑﺪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺷــﺪ .ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻏﻠﻮﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺳﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻰ ﺩﺷــﻤﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ،ﺳﻴﺎﻩﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ
ﺷــﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺳﻤﺶ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﻲﺍﺭﺯﺵ .ﻫﺮ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻣﻨﻔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻩ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻢ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻳﻢ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻤﻠﻜﺖ ﺷــﻬﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺪ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺳــﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ،ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ
ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﺎﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﺘــﺮ ﺭﻏﺒﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺑﻰ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﻨﺪ.
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺻﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ
ﻳﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻧﻰ ﺟﻨﮓ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﻔﻪ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻰ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ
ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺎﺯﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ
ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺗﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﻜﺎﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻰ ﻭ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺘﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎﺏ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺳﻼﺡ ،ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻩﺑﺴﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ
ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲﺧﻴﻠــﻲ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ
ﻭﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺳــﻮﻡ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ
ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳــﺪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻭ
ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
ﮔﻼﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ .ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺿﻌﻒﻫﺎﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻰ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻰ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸــﺎﻳﻰ ﭘﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ،
ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧــﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺙ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ.
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﮕﺮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻰ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺳﻮﺍﺭﻯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻣﻰﺑﻨﺪﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺴــﻞﻫﺎ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺭﺍﺍﺯﻧﺴﻞﻫﺎﻯﻗﺒﻞﻣﻰﺑﺮﺩﻳﻌﻨﻲﻗﻄﻊ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁﺑﻴﻦﻧﺴﻞﺣﺎﺿﺮ
ﺑﺎ ﻧﺴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪﺍﺵ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻫﺎ ،ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﺴﻞﻫﺎ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩﻧﺎﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺴــﻞ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺳــﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺴﻞ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻳﻘﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺴﻞ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻣﺪﺩ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦﻣﺎﻫﺸﺖﺳﺎﻝﺟﻨﮓﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢﻛﻪﭼﻪﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢﻭﭼﻪﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺏ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ 80ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﻫﺸﺖ ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨــﮓ ﻣﻼﻁ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻪﻧﺸــﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﺎ
ﻧﺴﻞﻓﻌﻠﻲﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞﻧﺸﺎﻥﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮﻣﻦﻳﻜﻲﺍﺯﺩﻻﻳﻠﺶﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ
ﺩﻫﻴﻢﻭﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻫﻢﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢﺍﻳﻦﻧﺴﻞﺗﻤﺎﻡﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶﺭﺍﺯﻣﻴﻦﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﺩ
ﻭﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﭘﺎﻱﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪﻛﻪﻣﺎﻓﻜﺮﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱﻣﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺳــﻮﺍﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺯ
ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴﻞ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ؟
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻴــﻢ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻫﺴــﺘﻴﻢ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺴﻞ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺤﺚ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺸــﺎﺭﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺠﻠﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻨﺼﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻧﺰﻧﻴﻢ ﻣﺘﺎﺳــﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺯﺣﻤﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻘﻠﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻛﻴﺴﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺷﻤﻦ ،ﻛﻪ ﺷﻜﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻐﺮﺿﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ.
145
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ
ﻗﺼﻪ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﻟﻴﻼ ﺻﺪﺭﻱ
ﭘﺎﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪﻧﺪ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﭘﺴــﻨﺪﻧﺪ؟ ﺑــﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﭼــﻪ ﻛ ﺎ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻳــﻲ ﻭﻗــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟ ﺫﻫﻦ ،ﻣﻌﻴﺸــﺖ ﻭ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳــﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮﻱ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺷﻴﺮﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﻧﻮﻳﺴﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻔﺖﻭﺑﺴﺖ
ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ .ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﻣﺨﺪﻭﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺩﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻣﺎﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺪﻭﻣﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ
ﺟﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻫﺎﻟــﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺑﻴــﺎﺕ ،ﺭﺣﻴﻢ ﻣﺨﺪﻭﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
»ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪ« ﻣﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻳﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ
ﭼﺎپ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ» :ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺼﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ،ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴــﺘﻀﻌﻔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﻫــﺎ ﻭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ،ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺴــﺘﻜﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﭘﻮﻟﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻟﻪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
»ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﻫﺎ« ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻤــﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ،ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻣﺎ،
ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺷﺖﻫﺎ ،ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻤﻲ ،ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ ﺭﺍﺣﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ 26 ،ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺑــﺎ ﺁﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺁﻥ
ﺷــﺮﻭﻉ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ .ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺁﻳﻪ ،ﻣﻀﻤــﻮﻥ ﻗﺼﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻫﻦ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺗﻠﺨﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺷﻴﺮﻳﻨﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺗﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﻧﺶ
ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﻳﺰﺩ ،ﻳﻚ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺗﻠﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻧﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻪ ﻣﺎﻭﺭﺍﻳــﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻠﺨﻲ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﻳﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﻮﺧﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻭ
ﻣﺮﺯ ﻃﻨﺰ ﻭ ﻫﺠﻮ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻗﺼﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ
ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺍﺳــﺖ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺳﺮﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﻣﺨﺪﻭﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ
ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺠــﺮ 8ﻭ ﻛﺮﺑﻼﻱ ،5ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺣــﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ،ﺑﺮ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷــﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺳــﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ
»ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪ« ،ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ ﺟﻤﺸﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻣﻬﺎﺟﺮ ﺍﻓﻐﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺮﺣﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﺠﺮﻭﺡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺳــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔــﺮ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺏ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺭﺍﻩ ﺟﺒﻬﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻋﺒﺪﺍﻟﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺳﺎﻝ 66ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻤﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ،
ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﻭﻭﺩﺁﺑﺎﺩ ﻭﺭﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﺎﺯﻩ
ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﻭ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻋﺰﻳﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺣﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻴﺪﺭﻱ
»ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﻫﺎ« ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ،ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪ ﺑﭽﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻣﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺩﺷﺖﻫﺎ ،ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻮﺳﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺩ
ﺭﺍﺣﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ
146
ﻧﻪ ﺁﺑﻲ ﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻛﻲ ،ﻳﻚ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ؛ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺫﻧﻲ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻫﻞ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻗﺼﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻝﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱﺟﻨﮓﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﻳﺪ.ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﺍﻳﻦﻗﺼﻪﻫﺎﺑﺎﺷﺐﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕﻭ
ﺗﻮپﻭﺗﻔﻨﮓﺷﺮﻭﻉﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ،ﺍﻣﺎ»ﻧﻪﺁﺑﻲ،ﻧﻪﺧﺎﻛﻲ«ﺣﺎﻝﻭﺭﻭﺯﻣﺮﺩﻡ
ﺷﻬﺮ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻋﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺫﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺕ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺩﻡ
ﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺵ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ،ﻳﺎﺩ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻫﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﻖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺶ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ .ﻛﺘﺎﺏ »ﻧﻪ ﺁﺑﻲ ،ﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻛﻲ« ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﻧﻮﻳﺴــﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﻌﺎﺭﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ.ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ
ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﻧﻜﺘﻪﺟﺎﻟﺐﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺭﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﻫﺎﺳﺖ.ﻣﻮﺫﻧﻲﺳﻌﻲﻛﺮﺩﻩﺑﺎﺟﻤﻠﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺨﺘﺼﺮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﺮﺳــﺎﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺻﻔﺤﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ:
»ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﺳﻴﺪ :ﻣﻮﻋﺪ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ!« ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﭘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻔﺤﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﻔﻴﺪﻱﻛﻪﻳﻚﺟﻤﻠﻪﺩﺭﺁﻥﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩ؛ﺟﻤﻠﻪﺍﻱﻛﻪﺑﺎﺍﻳﻬﺎﻡﻭﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩﺍﺳﺖ»:ﻇﻬﺮﺍﺳﺖ.ﺁﻓﺘﺎﺏﺷﺪﻳﺪﻣﻲﺗﺎﺑﺪ.ﺗﺸﻨﻪﺍﻡﻭﮔﺮﺳﻨﻪ«.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺁﺩﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﻫﻢﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪﺁﻧﻬﺎﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪﻛﻪﺍﺯﮔﺮﺳﻨﮕﻲﻭﺗﺸﻨﮕﻲﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﻧﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺴــﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺸــﻨﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺗﺸــﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻼﻓﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ .ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺑﺎ
ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻭﺳــﻂ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺗﻴﻎ ﺁﻓﺘﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺗﺸﻨﮕﻲ ،ﻳﺎﺩ
ﻛﺮﺑﻼﻧﻤﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ؟
»ﻧﻪﺁﺑﻲ،ﻧﻪﺧﺎﻛﻲ«ﺍﺯﺯﺑﺎﻥﺩﺍﻧﺎﻱﻛﻞﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ
»ﻧﻪ ﺁﺑﻲ ،ﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻛﻲ« ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺎﻱ ﻛﻞ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻭ
ﺟﻮﺭﻭﺍﺟﻮﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻱ
ﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺍﺩ .ﺭﺍﻭﻱ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ.
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺨﺖ
ﻭ ﻧﺎﺏ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩﻭﺟﻮﺭﻭﺍﺟﻮﺭﻳﻚﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﺍﺯﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲﻭﺩﻭﺭﻱﺍﺯﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍﺩﻩ
ﻭﺍﺩﺍﻱﺩﻳﻦﺑﻪﭘﻴﺮﻣﺮﺍﺩ.ﺭﺍﻭﻱﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱﺍﺳﺖﻛﻪﺩﺭﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒﻟﺤﻈﻪﻫﺎ
ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻣﻲﺷــﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎ .ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨــﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻟﺤﻈﻪﻫﺎﻱﺳﺨﺖﻭﻧﺎﺏﺟﻨﮓﺷﺮﻳﻚﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،ﺩﺳﺖﺍﻭﺭﺍﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩﻭ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ.ﺩﺍﻧﺎﻱﻛﻞﻛﺘﺎﺏ،ﺷﺎﻫﺪﺧﺪﺍﺣﺎﻓﻈﻲﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﺶ
ﺍﺯﭘﺪﺭﻭﻣﺎﺩﺭﻫﺎﻱﭘﻴﺮﺑﺎﭼﺸﻢﻫﺎﻱﮔﺮﻳﺎﻥﺍﺳﺖ،ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻧﻤﺎﺯﺷﺐﻭﮔﺮﻳﻪ
ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺯﻣﻨﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻜﺲ ﻫﻤﺴﺮ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﺸﺎﻥ .ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ
ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻝﺧﻮﺩﺵﻫﻢﺍﻏﺮﺍﻕﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪﻭﺑﺎﺻﺪﺍﻗﺖﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪﮔﺎﻫﻲﺍﺯﻧﻔﺲ
ﺧﻮﺩﻣﻲﺗﺮﺳﺪﻭﻟﻲﭼﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱﻧﻴﺴﺖ،ﻫﻢﺑﺎﻳﺪﻧﻮﺷﺖﻫﻢﺑﺎﻳﺪﺟﻨﮕﻴﺪ.
»ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﻟﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻦ ﺗﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﻮﻗﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ.ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﺩﺭﻓﺮﺻﺖﻫﺎﻱﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺣﺖﺩﺭﺍﺯﻣﻲﻛﺸﻢﻭﺟﻤﻠﻪﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻨﻢ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﻢﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﺱﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﻡﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻤﻠﻪﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺭﻓﺖ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻨﺶ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺣﺲ ﻭ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺭﻓﺖ ،ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺨﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺑﻲﺭﻭﺡ» «.ﻧﻪ ﺁﺑﻲ ،ﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻛﻲ« ﻳﻚ ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺳــﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﺷــﻴﻮﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺎ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩﻭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺟﻠﻮ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺩﺭ
»ﻧﻪ ﺁﺑﻲ ،ﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﻛﻲ« ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕﻫﺎ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ،
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻟﺤﻦ ﻧﻮﺷــﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻳﻘﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ.ﻧﻜﺘﻪﻗﺎﺑﻞﺗﻮﺟﻪﺍﻳﻦﻛﺘﺎﺏ،ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺫﻧﻲ ﻓﺮﻕ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺷﻬﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ ﺣﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ
ﺍﺣﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺸــﺪ .ﺁﺩﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺘــﺎﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﻣﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ،
ﺩﺳﺖﻳﺎﻓﺘﻨﻲﺍﻧﺪﻭﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺩﻟﻴﻞﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐﺑﺎﻗﺼﻪﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻣﺜﻠﺚ 5ﻣﻬﺮ 1388